Differences in OBIA 7.9.6.2 and 7.9.6.3

Hi Experts,
I want to figure out changes in datamodel for OBIA 7.9.6.2 and 7.9.6.3.
Or what changes are there in Informatica mapings/repository.
Please can any one help me with any documentation or any sort of info.
Regards
Tarun
Edited by: 909813 on Jan 24, 2012 3:55 AM

Hi,
I am not sure if you got the answer for your question. I am also in search of the answer for a similar question. As per my understanding from the OBIA documentations, the ETL process of OBIA will redo the conversion of the transactional amounts provided the conversion rates for the currencies in question are available in the GL Daily Conversion rates table. And OBIA provides 3 global currncy options (as per the same currency parameters that you have listed in your query below) as the reporting currency choices for the users. As per my understanding these three currency options will be available for the users as the options to choose in the reporting / presentation layer. I am curious to know if this understanding is correct. If you are through your OBIA implementation by this time you may be in a postition to clarify this.
The actual question I am trying to seek is "Is this a correct approach to redo the conversion all over again while the transaction tables in Oracle EBS tables are already storing the converted amounts and the conversion rate details in the transaction table itself ? Does this not leads to the rounding and therefore accruacy issues ? What about those cases where fewtransactions being done by users using special conversion rates (conversion rate type = "User")?" Doesn't this behaviour leads to the capturing of incorrect converted amounts in the data ware house?
Regards,
Manohar.

Similar Messages

Key differences in OBI Apps Spend Procurement and Spend Classification

Hi,
Can someone please explain the key differences in OBI Apps Spend Procurement and Spend Classification version 7.9.6.2 vs. version 7.9.6.3?
Regards
Vanaja

There doesnt seem to be much diferences in terms of functionality or features. If you check the release notes..there are a few differences in the 7963 release related to bugs or packaging:
If this is helpful or correct, please mark the response as correct or helpful.
Here are some of the sections from the release notes:
Section 1.3.28, "Currency Conversion Not Done in Purchase Agreement for Oracle Procurement and Spend Analytics"
*1.3.32 'Days Payables Outstanding' and 'AP Turnover' Columns Are Missing*This issue applies to only those Oracle BI Applications customers who have implemented Procurement and Spend Analytics without implementing Financial Analytics.
*1.3.43 Oracle EBS 12.1.3 - Contract Lifecycle Management Impact on Oracle BI Applications Release 7.9.6.3*This issue applies to only those Oracle BI Applications customers who have implemented Procurement and Spend Analytics for E-Business Suite (EBS) 12.1.3 along with Feature Pack for Oracle Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) for Public Sector. CLM Feature Pack is deployed as an add-on to Oracle EBS 12.1.3 for delivering an integrated acquisition management solution for federal government procurement.
CLM functionality has introduced changes to the Oracle EBS data model that affects data extraction and loading for Oracle Procurement and Spend Analytics. Customers with Oracle EBS 12.1.3 and the CLM feature pack must apply additional filters to exclude CLM records and to ensure that it does not interfere with V7.9.6.3 Procurement and Spend Analytics functionality.
Workaround
No work-around is available for this issue.
*1.3.56 EXPENSE_INVOICE_POSTED_DT Not Pulled From AP_CHECKS_ALL.CHECK_DATE for Oracle E-Business Suite*This issue affects Oracle Procurement and Spend Analytics. The measure 'Expense Reimbursement Cycle Time' as shipped with this release does not work in the subject area Employee Expenses – Overview. The measure uses the column EXPENSE_INVOICE_POSTED_DT_WID in the fact table W_EXPENSE_F fact, but this column is sourced from AP_EXPENSE_REPORT_HEADERS_ALL.EXPENSE_LAST_STATUS_DATE during ETL.
Workaround
This issue is addressed by Oracle E-Business Suite patch 10038359.

Difference between using app server connection pooling and using the driver

Hi all,
How to get connection pooling with out application server and tomcat also?
What is the difference between using app server connection pooling and using the driver supported connection pooling?
Regards,
Murali

maybe the performance of App server pool is better than the JDBC pool,
for you don't know wether the implementation of the JDBC interface is good or bad.

What the difference between u0093Valuate GL Account Open Itemsu0094 and u0093Valuate G/

hi gurus
What the difference between Valuate GL Account Open Items and Valuate G/L Account Balances?
We found out that when we perform valuate GL account Open items there will be reversal done at the same time whereas when we perform Valuate G/L Account Balances there is NO reversal posting even though we hv entered the reversal posting date and Period.
Pls advise which one we should perform?

Valuate GL Account Open Items are for open item managed accounts including vendor/customer accounts. The valuation is performed for each (open) line items on key date specified.
"Valuate GL Balance" is for account NOT managed on Open Item basis but managed in foreign currency. The period balance of key date in foreign currency is valuated. Reversal document can be created by selecting 'Reverse postings' in "Postings" tab.
Kyoko

Difference between the design of clusters PCLx and others like RFBLG etc .

There are a few nagging questions which I was not able to find in the forum hence i have to post a new question.
I am a little confused about the difference between the different clusters .
If i start with RFBLG i.e. the cluster for BSEG BSEC etc ,I can see that the tables which are part of this cluster
can be viewed through different methods like
1) whr usd list for RFBLG
2) dd02l table and give the required parameters there
now when I compare this with another so-called cluster PCL1 if find that PCL1 is not recognized as a cluster
and also I am not able to see the same in dd02l table when i give PCL1 and the tabtype as cluster which I was able to see
for the RFBLG ,there are other tables similar to RFBLG .
1) SO what is the difference between the RFBLG type of clusters and the PCLx type of cluster
2) are pclx and rfblg..type of clusters same ?
3) why does PCL1 shows that it is a transparent table ? where as rfblg shows in a diff way in se11
4) i know we access data from PCL1 using import and export stmts ,DO OR CAN WE DO THE SAME FOR RFBLG
5) I found that each and evry cluster table had diff fields ,this was kinda surprising for me as I had been thinking
that all cluster tables need to follow a certain rule ,SO WHO DECIDES THE FIELDS OF A TABLE CLUSTER ?
6) PCL1 has the index button enabled ,which again I think is not according to the cluster table rules?how?
7) I understand that we can save data in form of internal tables in the PCL1 cluster ,can we do the same in RFBLG ?
8) Can I think on lines that PCL1 and RFBLG type of cluster are two totally different types of data dictionary objects
and the usage and implementation of both of them is different and that the design and the BASE of both of such objects
is different .
I know this is a long list but I am sure that answers to these questions would really require some one who has really really work hard and invested a lot of time in understanding the dictionary system.I am awaiting a few answers ,few hints and a healthy discussion till we get them .
Thanks ...
a

Hello,
1/
BSEG is a typical Cluster Table.
This means that the physical table BSEG does NOT exist in the database, physical data for BSEG is stored in the database (table) cluster RFBLG.
In ABAP however you can perform selects on BSEG (with all fields from the SAP repository structure, see SE11 on BSEG), during execution the SAP database layer will translate these statements to physical selects in the RFBLG database table, so in ABAP this is transparant.
More info :
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cf/21f083446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cf/21f083446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm]
2/
PCL1, PCL2, ... are normal SAP transparent tables, however in HR they are often called HR cluster table.
Transparent tables are SAP objects where there is also a database table with the same name that contains the physical data.
However the PCL tables are somewhat different from normal transparent tables (data is compressed, external programs can not interpret the data, ...).
This means that in ABAP you can not use simple SQL statements to access data in PCL tables (because of compressed format).
In stead statements like EXPORT TO DATABASE and IMPORT FROM DATABASE need to be used.
More info :
[http://fuller.mit.edu/hr/cluster_tables.html|http://fuller.mit.edu/hr/cluster_tables.html]
Wim

Is there any difference between R/3 4.7 version and ECC 5.0????

Hi All,
Is there any difference between R/3 4.7 version and ECC 5.0 for the transaction RSA5.
Regards,
Andy

Andy
Functionality wise I didn't see any difference other than new datasources in ECC5.0
Thnaks
Sat

What is the difference between credit memo in invoice year and in next year

Hi!
I'm new here.I'm study SAP ERP.I don't know what is the difference between credit memo in invoice year and credit memo in next year (asset accounting).Can you show and give me an example, please!
Thanks and best regards!
Edited by: dinhtuan on Jun 28, 2010 3:10 PM

Hi,
Maybe have a look at the SAP Help for further information (http://help.sap.com) : e.g. 'Posting Credit Memos Integrated with Vendor' or 'Posting a Credit Memo Offset Against a Clearing Account'
Transaction type 105 for credit memo on current acquisition made in the current year, posting key 75. Or transaction type 160 for credit memo on acquisitions from prior years. posting key 75.
Note: determine if the asset was acquired in the current fiscal year or in a closed fiscal year (Display asset values).
If the asset was acquired in a fiscal year that is now closed, correct the past depreciation using a write-up (in that case check out and refer to Posting Write-Ups).
I hope this helps.
Kind regards,
Brigitte

What is the difference between these two reports MC.1 and MB5L

Hi
what is the difference between these two reports MC.1 and MB5L?
what is the Purpose of each report?
Material ledger is activated for this plant, we found some amount difference between these two reports, my client accounting department used to compare these two reports while year end/month end closing
Thanks
Raju

MC.1 will give you the report for plant analysis as per plant .
MB5L report will give you list of stock value as per G/L account wise.

Difference Between SAP ECC. 6.0 and 4.6c

Hi
What is the Difference Between SAP ECC. 6.0 and 4.6c
with respect to module wise, like SD, MM, FI,
thanks
Satish

Hi,
There is lot difference between 4.6c and 6.0
1) ecc 6.0 coming with inbuild webdynpro , BSP it is not 4.6c
2) In ecc we have interactive forms concept where it was not there in 4.6c
3) 4.6c there is no unicode concept here we have unicode and non unicode
You can follow the link also
difference between SAP 4.6C and SAP ECC6.0
Rgds,
Suman

Difference between Oracle9i 9.2.0.3 and Oracle9i 9.2.0.4 JDBC Drivers

Hi everybody,
Can you tell me what is Difference between Oracle9i 9.2.0.3 and Oracle9i 9.2.0.4 JDBC Drivers briefly?
In my application I am using Oracle9i 9.2.0.3 JDBC Drivers. But it is not supported when I retrieved Data with junk character from CLOB.because of IO Exception it showing Bigger type length than Maximum
if i used Oracle9i 9.2.0.4 JDBC Drivers it is working properly.
I am using WAS 4.0.3 , JDK1.3 and Oracle 9.0.
Shall I use Oracle9i 9.2.0.4 in my application and I want to know it will create any new problem in my application or not ?
please Reply me ASAP.
i am waiting for your reply
thanks a lot
bye
Message was edited by:
paulusazapakcom

Can you tell me what is Difference between Oracle9i
9.2.0.3 and Oracle9i 9.2.0.4 JDBC Drivers briefly?Search the Oracle site. That should tell if there are any differences at all. I would assume that there would be some bug fixes.
please Reply me ASAP.
i am waiting for your replySuch lines are better avoided.

Differences between the "Adobe Acrobat Versions 7 and 9"

Dear Adobe Support Team,
I need to know the differences between the "Adobe Acrobat Versions 7 and 9". I have worked with Acrobat 7 and have used the same script after installing Acrobat 9 for Automation Testing with QTP for validating pdf. The object "AcroExch.AVDoc" is not getting identified as object while working in QTP in the system/machine which has Acrobat 9 installed, whereas it works well in the machine which has Acrobat 7 installed . So it will be better if two things are known as per my understanding, ie.,
it must have compatibility issue (i need the difference between "Adobe Acrobat versions 7 & 9" to assure this) or
installation issue( which can be confirmed if the former question is answered).
So i kindly request you to help me out for this scenario.
Kind Regards,
Vikraman.G

Countless new features were introduced between Acrobat 7 and 9, are you really expecting us to type out a full list from memory?
If you are having specific issues with the Acrobat SDK, first refer to the Acrobat SDK for the higher version. If there remains an issue I suggest posting about the specific problem in the Acrobat SDK forum, rather than asking for an encylopedia of all possible information...
Note that Adobe do not support multiple installations of Acrobat on the same machine, so you can expect development issues if you do this.

How to get the difference of two dates in years,months and days

Hi friends,
how to get the difference of two dates in years,months and days
for ex 2 years 3 months 13 days
select (sysdate-date_Start) from per_periods_of_service
thanks

Something like this...
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 with t as (select to_date('17-nov-2006','dd-mon-yyyy') as c_start_date, to_date('21-jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy') as c_end_date from dual union all
2             select to_date('21-nov-2006','dd-mon-yyyy'), to_date('17-feb-2008','dd-mon-yyyy') from dual union all
3             select to_date('21-jun-2006','dd-mon-yyyy'), to_date('17-jul-2008','dd-mon-yyyy') from dual
4             )
5 -- end of test data
6 select c_start_date, c_end_date
7        ,trunc(months_between(c_end_date, c_start_date) / 12) as yrs
8        ,trunc(mod(months_between(c_end_date, c_start_date), 12)) as mnths
9        ,trunc(c_end_date - add_months(c_start_date, trunc(months_between(c_end_date, c_start_date)))) as dys
10* from t
SQL> /
C_START_D C_END_DAT        YRS      MNTHS        DYS
17-NOV-06 21-JAN-08          1          2          4
21-NOV-06 17-FEB-08          1          2         27
21-JUN-06 17-JUL-08          2          0         26
SQL>But, don't forget that different months have different numbers of days, and leap years can effect it too.

ABAP differences of SAP R/3 4.6 and ECC 6.0

What are the ABAP differences of SAP R/3 4.6 and ECC 6.0?

Hi
Difference between version on functionalities you can find on the following link.
Give the source version (i.e. 4.6 C) and select the target version (i.e. ECC 6.0)
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
Please check this Release notes :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/43/6880cbb88f297ee10000000a422035/content.htm
Check if this is helpfull
Short Difference between R/3 4.7, ECC5 & ECC6 !!!!!
1. SAP NetWeaver is SAP's technology platform. It has all of SAP's
technology in it. It is used to build and run SAP Applications and customer
applications (Application server, data warehouse, portal, coding, messaging,
etc). You can find more information on the SAP NetWeaver page on the SAP
Service Marketplace (http://service.sap.com/netweaver). Of course they is
also in on the SAP NetWeaver page in SDN.
2. ABAP is part of SAP NetWeaver. BW is part of SAP NetWeaver (as of
the 3.5release).
3. Prior to SAP NetWeaver, BW was a seperate product. It is shipped as part
of SAP NetWeaver since the SAP NetWeaver '04 release (SAP NetWeaver BI 3.5).
4. SAP ECC is part of the SAP ERP application (actually it is the minimal
installation of SAP ERP). SAP ERP runs on SAP NetWeaver. So when you get SAP
ERP you get SAP NetWeaver.
- SAP ECC 5.0 is part of SAP ERP 2004 [which runs on SAP NetWeaver '04]
- SAP ECC 6.0 is part of SAP ERP 6.0 (2005) [which runs on SAP
NetWeaver 7.0(2004s)]
5. SAP NetWeaver is delivered with SAP ERP so ABAP and the functional
modules are include in SAP ERP.
6. With SAP ERP (SAP ECC) you have a choice of activating BI within the SAP
ERP system or deploying in a seperate system. This is information is in the
SAP ERP master guides which can be found at
http://service.sap.com/instguides.
For SAP ERP 6.0 (ECC 6.0) it will the SAP NetWeaver 7.0 version of BI.
Also check
/thread/170347 [original link is broken]
The only difference between ECC5 and ECC6 is that additional components like mySAPCRM, mySAPPLM, mySAPSCM, mySAPSRM are added in ECC6.0. HR was already a part of ECC5.0.
http://abdurohman.wordpress.com/2007/06/29/whats-new-in-ecc5-and-ecc6-ecc7/
Reward if usefull

Difference between execution mode of Print preview and Print for Output

Hello,
Can anybody tell the difference between execution mode of print preview and print for an output (For eg. PO output or Invoice)?. I am trying to download some documents linked to Purchase order to desktop. The code is written in the same driver program for printing PO and it is executed after smartform function module is called. It works fine in print preview mode and it fails in print mode. The reason why download fails in print mode is that GUI not available (just found from debugging).
Any ideas?
Thanks
Anil

HI
try using any other printer and find out if you are getting the correct output. The printer needs to support Multiple Unicode encoding schemes like UTF 8, UTF 16BE, and UTF 16LE, plus special characters and logos, bi-directional text layout, and custom characters..

Difference between Testing Message in Integarion Engine and Adapter Engine

Hi Experts,
in project, we always test message in runtime workbench>component monitoring>integration engine-->Test Messge
however, i also find that in runtime workbench>component monitoring>adapter engine also exists a Test Message tab.
we don't have access to test messages in this tab, so can anyone tell that what is the difference between testing message in integration engine and adapter engine?
thanks in advance.

The usual flow of messages in scenarios which use adapters at both sender and receiver end is as follows
Sender system -> Adapter Engine -> Integration Engine -> Adapter Engine -> Receiver system
When you use the testing option in IE, then you are basically posting the message directly to the Integration Engine.
When you use the testing option in AE, then you are trying to post the message to the adapter engine, which will then forward the message to the Integration Engine. IN this testing, you are also testing the sender adapter also.
Regards,
Ravi Kanth Talagana

Differences in OBIA 7.9.6.2 and 7.9.6.3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for