Different Capabilities between BW 3.0 and 3.5

Hi Everyone,
I am currently gathering user requirements for BW FICO.
There's a user requirement to edit/change the data that has been updated in the infoproviders. Has anyone of you done such a requirement before? How can we edit the data once it has been updated into the infocube?
My BW system is currently BW 3.0B.
I have been tasked to check if other versions like BW 3.5 is able to do direct maintenance of infocube data.
But I can't find any documentation on the new capabilities of 3.5. Does anyone of you have the link to such documentations?
Please help.
Thanks.
Regards,
Shunhui.

Hi,
Go through the below the documentation:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/e3/e60138fede083de10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
Assess where your SAP BW-based reporting activities are optimized and where they are underperforming. Take home strategies to bolster the ease, quality and performance of BW navigation, drill-down, formatting, printing, analytics, and dashboards.
The Web Application Designer delivers powerful layout and formatting capabilities, including drill-down analytics, which are critical for solutions such as SAP SEM. Yet there are common misconceptions about this tool's capabilities and skill set requirements that often lead to improper or under-utilization.
Whether you've upgraded to SAP BW 3.5 or are planning a future upgrade, this session provides invaluable instruction for how to leverage the new SAP Information Broadcaster to better schedule and execute the delivery of SAP BW reports. Get real-world advice on how companies are already deriving value from this important tool
Formatting and printing reports is a major challenge. Explore and fully understand the requirements, benefits, and trade-offs of SAP BW and third-party tools available to help you meet your formatting requirements.
Now that you understand your options, proceed step-by-step through examples to create attractive, formatted reports using the SAP BW tools you've already invested in. This session draws on real-world examples of how the world's leading SAP BW users successfully create formatted reports.
Often considered the exclusive domain of BW administrators and the IT community, the SAP BW Reporting Agent can be readily leveraged by knowledgeable power users to schedule and automate the running of pre-calculated, offline reports. This session tells you how and when it's appropriate for power users to pre-schedule reports.
Regardless of your level of experience with SAP BW, this session offers a wealth of practical advice for how to fully leverage the power of SAP BW ad hoc query functionality. Gain insights into how to train and trust your power users and still maintain tight control over security and system performance.
Get practical advice to simplify and customize the creation of financial reports in SAP BW, and ensure that these reports are timely, accurate, and compliant with regulatory guidelines and standards
See how advanced techniques enable you to go beyond standard SAP BW reporting capabilities and extract greater value from your SAP BW system. Find out how to ask the right questions and build requirements so that you get what you need from your technical team.
SAP BW 3.5 and beyond introduce new features and tools to expand your reporting options and capabilities. Whether you've already upgraded to SAP BW 3.5, or are considering a future upgrade, you'll need to understand the implication these new development have on your reporting environment.
Hope this helps
DST

Similar Messages

  • Different CUOBJ between sales order item and production order

    Hi gurus,
    Our SAP solution is IS Mill & Variant configuration based, we're using ECC6 as OLTP system mapped to APO PP/DS from which module we trigger the planned order into production order conversion. We're exclusively using the 2 different production type : MTO & MTS. When Sales order based (MTO), it was not possible so far to change the configuration of the production order since following Message no. CO661 was advising the data for the configuration was taken from the allocated SO:
    Here is an old thread we'd posted where we were requesting further details about above message: Message CO 661 - Characteristics values were copied - you can only display
    We recently upgraded SP level (SAP_BASIS) from 15 to 30 on ECC6 side, SAP Basis Component on SCM side has been remaining unchanged with release 700 level 016.
    We now observe the message is unexpectively NOT raising anymore so-that the configuration can be freely adjusted; reason seem to be a different CUOBJ between the SO and its production order; please not the issue do not take place when creating the production order directly from ECC6 through CO08.
    Would you please help to clarify the reason of such a behaviour? Thanks in advance.
    Remark: snote 1326891 has been patched but w/o any added value as it do not really apply (= CTP not used)
    BR,
    Pascal.

    UP
    Below as an illustration CUOBJ from VBAP versus CUOBJ from AFPO
    Both WO have been created from APO, difference is the first one was created prior our SP level upgrade. I have to admitt CUOBJ mechanism between ECC & APO is quite unclear, below CUOBJ found when reading planned order data with FM /SAPAPO/RRP_LC_ORDER_GET_DATA (reading executed prior conversion, same outcome when reading prior its creation)
    BR,
    Pascal.

  • Different calculation between vision 6.1 and 7

    Hi there,
    I've made an particle analysis in vision assistant 7 and searched for the perimeter of a special particle. If I do the same procedure with the same picture in vision builder 6.1, there's a different value (This one is larger than the value in Vision 7).
    Does anyone know, what changes in calculating the perimeter have been done between those 2 revisions? Or could there be other reasons for different solutions?
    Thanks a lot
    Gibbi

    Vision 7.0 introduced "IMAQ Particle Analysis" which replaces "IMAQ Complex Particle". "IMAQ Particle Analysis" uses a different algorithm to calculate the perimeter that is generally more accurate than that used by "IMAQ Complex Particle". If you could post an image containing the particle in question I would certainly like to take a look at it.
    Kevin C.
    Software Engineer
    National Instruments
    IMAQ Vision

  • Same crystal file is having different format between BO XI R2 and BO XI R3

    Hi,
    we are migrating from BO XI R2(BO version 11.5.11.1470)  to BO XI R3.1 SP3(BO version 12.3.0.601)
    We have a test.rpt (crystal report) which when deployed in BO XI R2 and exported in pdf behaves differently when same rpt is uploaded in BO XI R3 and exported in pdf.
    The differnce is: In R2 the two text boxes donot overlap with each other but in XI R3 same text boxes overlap .
    So, is there any particlaur patch or any configuration required in R3 , so that the reports developed in R2 donot have any formatting regressions when deployed in R3

    Thanks for your quick reply !!!
    are you able to run your report on-demand in the InfoView?
    --> I receive my error when I open/run  the report.
    Which version of CR Designer are you using?
    -->  CR 11.5.9
    Any chance to upgrade? There is already SP6 available for XI R2.
    --> We project to migrate to R3.1 this year but we want to show report earlier ( if it's possible on R2 of course ).
    Cédric

  • Mail malfunctioning in different ways between iMac, MacBook pro and iPhone

    I yesterday purchased an iMac from a friend and under her recommendation installed OS ML on both it and my MacBook Pro.
    Now mail and the syncing between the three is being completely whacky; it works fine on my MacBook pro, on my iPhone i have emails from the last two days then it skips to emails from 2010, on my iMac on the other hand, all the emails appear to be fine in the subjects, but then the contents of the email are completely screwed up, for instance in the body of an Email from the iTunes store with the title 'Your Receipt ####' will actually have the contents of an email a friend sent me in 2007 ?!
    What is going on? Also I am really unsavvy so I have no idea if this is something I did??
    HELP!!

    Too much going on here to understand. You should break this down into the mail issues for each device and then separately for sycing. Are you using POP email, Exchange, other? How are you syncing? - iCloud, Exchange?
    If I had to guess and you are using POP, seems like the iMac had corruption in the mail database either before or during the ML update. I believe ML Mail makes changes to the database the first time it runs. Do you have a backup? You may be able to try again or restore from there.
    To understand the sync issue you need to provide more information.

  • What's different function between Webi on InfoView and Webi Rich Client?

    My interest on Webi XI 3.1 version
    Please details of describes on both of them.
    Thanks,

    Hi Eric,
    The two use the same format and reports are interchangable. The big difference is that Rich Client can work offline and can import local files.
    After that I suggest you look at
    http://help.sap.com/businessobject/product_guides/boexir31/en/xi3-1_web_intelligence_rich_client_en.pdf
    Regards
    Alan

  • Different features between captivate trial version and the product itself

    Hi everyone,
    Can you please share me the feautres that are included in
    adobe captivate 3 product but not included in trial version.

    Hi Karen
    The only difference is the time in which you have to use it
    and the fact that during the trial period, any projects you create
    using the trial will automatically have an expiration date
    configured that you can't disable until you purchase the license.
    Once you do that, the check box that allows you to disable the
    expiration date for the project will work.
    Hopefully that helps... Rick

  • Different behaviour between activity "Change Production" and web-service

    Hello!
    We are using SAP ME 5.2.6.1 (SP06 Patch 1) - the newest version of SAP ME 5.2
    In activity "Change Production" (SU540) it is possible to change shop order, material and router of SFC's.
    This also works for SFC's in status DONE if the following activity rule is set
    ALLOW_DONE_SFCS = TRUE.
    Nevertheless if the same is tried via "Production XML" or with the given web service an error is displayed
    and the operation is not performed.
    When using "Production XML" the following error is shown:
    Cannot change Done SFCs (Message 15050)
    When using the web service (http://<host>:<port>/manufacturing-services/ProductionServiceService)
    the same error occurs. I think the web service is the prefered way in the future.
    For me it seems that only with the GUI activity SU540 the rule "ALLOW_DONE_SFCS = TRUE" is effective.
    But should the behaviour not be identical regardless if this was initiated from the GUI or from the web service?
    So is this something like a bug or is it "behaviour by design"?
    If the latter is the case:
    Is there a workaround possible to achieve the same outcome via webservice?
    Kr,
                Erich Lind
    Edited by: Erich Lind on Aug 5, 2011 10:37 AM

    Hello!
    From the SAP ME Transaction Log Report:
    Concerning the "Production XML" interface - it uses the ChangeProduction EJB.
    I assume the web service internally will do the same ...
    class com.sap.me.frame.BasicBOBeanException message: com.sap.me.frame.BasicBOBeanException: Error 15050Cannot change Done SFCs (Message 15050)
         at com.sap.me.production.ChangeProductionSOBean.validateSFCList(ChangeProductionSOBean.java:1413)
         at com.sap.me.production.ChangeProductionSOBean.validateXMLProductionChanges(ChangeProductionSOBean.java:255)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:592)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.RequestInvocationContext.proceedFinal(RequestInvocationContext.java:46)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:166)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_StatesTransition.invoke(Interceptors_StatesTransition.java:19)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:177)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_Resource.invoke(Interceptors_Resource.java:71)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:177)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_Transaction.doWorkWithAttribute(Interceptors_Transaction.java:38)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_Transaction.invoke(Interceptors_Transaction.java:22)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:177)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:189)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_StatelessInstanceGetter.invoke(Interceptors_StatelessInstanceGetter.java:16)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:177)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_SecurityCheck.invoke(Interceptors_SecurityCheck.java:21)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:177)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.Interceptors_ExceptionTracer.invoke(Interceptors_ExceptionTracer.java:16)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.AbstractInvocationContext.proceed(AbstractInvocationContext.java:177)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.DefaultInvocationChainsManager.startChain(DefaultInvocationChainsManager.java:133)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ejb3.runtime.impl.DefaultEJBProxyInvocationHandler.invoke(DefaultEJBProxyInvocationHandler.java:164)
         at $Proxy3489.validateXMLProductionChanges(Unknown Source)
         at com.sap.me.xchange.ProductionFacadeSOBean.processChangeProductionMessage(ProductionFacadeSOBean.java:997)

  • Exchange rate is different between records in OB08 and records in document.

    Hi Gurus,
    The exchange rate is different between records in OB08 and records in calculated amount in line item. How does it happen? Not all of the documents in the same period has this problem.
    For example, a document A created by FB05 on Jun 30 2010.
    In OB08, the exchange rate is 6.80000. This rate was the same in the header of document A.
    In the line item of doc A, I calculated the amount for line itme 1 and 2. Line itme 1 shows the exchange rate is 7.90000. Line item 2 shows the exchange rate is 16.0000. ( The exchange rate is not that exactly an interger. I put a similar exchange rate as an example.)
    Could you please throw some light on these? Why some documents are okay but for some, the exchange rate is so different?
    I just found that the exchange rate of some of the document line item calculated is from another currency. It shows in the line item (in question) button "More Data". Shall I know how the exchange rate was got from another currency exchange rate?
    Thank you.
    Emma
    Edited by: qun yang on Aug 2, 2010 10:49 AM

    Issue solved by below solution:
    Existing:
          append lines of vit_final to s_s_if-maxsize to e_t_data.
          delete vit_final to s_s_if-maxsize.
        else.
          append lines of vit_final to s_s_if-maxsize to e_t_data.
          delete vit_final to s_s_if-maxsize.
    New:
          append lines of vit_final to e_t_data.
          delete vit_final to s_s_if-maxsize.
        else.
          append lines of vit_final to e_t_data.
          delete vit_final to s_s_if-maxsize.

  • What is the different between payment methods Wire and EFT

    Hi All
    can anybody tell me What is the different between payment methods Wire and EFT ?
    Regards ;

    WIRE:
    Wire is transfer of amount due directly to the supplier's bank it is an electronic transfer of funds
    This mode of payment is used for international suppliers.
    It can be paid in foreign currency or USD.
    Wire payments are same day payments.
    EFT:
    EFT ensures funds transfer from one bank account to another using electronic links.
    Can be used to make payments into domestic banks (within US) in USD only.
    It is faster than check payments.
    Hope this helps.

  • Can we have different products between B2B and B2C

    Hi Experts,
          I have one basic question.  Can we maintain the different products between B2B and B2C users.  Because we have requirement is B2B users should get all the products, but B2C users should get limited products.  Is there way we can setup like this to meet the requirements.  Please let me know.  Thank you very much in advance.
    With Regards,
    Sudheer.

    You do this by creating two Product Catalogs (PCAT_B2C and PCAT_B2B, for example)  Then, in ShopAdmin you assign the B2C site to PCAT_B2C and the B2B to the PCAT_B2B.
    Another possibility, although not very user friendly is to use one PCAT and allow B2B users to add items to their cart directly, even thought they're not in the PCAT.  The drawback here is that they MUST know the exact number and they can not search for them.  I can give more info on this if you feel it might work for you, but it is not a very good option as a general rule.

  • Different document between KZ and RE

    I would like to know what is the different between document of KZ and RE, as I know, RE is created by MIRO. how about KZ. Thanks

    Hi Port,
    RE Document type is for Vendor Purchase Invoice booking time Financial side automatically genarated the document at the the time of MIRO Entry against the WE Docuement Entry.
    KZ Document type is for Vendor Payment through Check or others.
    Hope it will clear.
    Regards,
    Kishore K

  • Different Between KT4V ver1.0 and KT4V v10A

    Hi guys, when i just bought a new MSI KT4V from a shop, it was version 1.0, but 3 month later i send for warrantty claim, they return the board to me (I think they  replace the board, but i dun think it was a new board, it was a used board), but it was KT4V Ver10A, i bought this board at Malaysia, do anybody know about it ?? Can let me know what is the different between Version 1.0 and 10A ????  ?(
    In my mind, i think maybe is KT4V Ver 2.0  :D
    I got send mail to MSI official site, but sadly it auto reply by the machine, do anybody know how to send a mail to technical support which will reply and give a solution for you problem ???

    The cpu temp looks to be slightly high for an idle temp.  Could be caused by too much thermal grease or poor airflow through the case, even by high ambient temps in the room where the system is located.  These temps are normally measured in centigrade and should not exceed 43 degrees to 45 degrees at idle.  Yours appear to be about 50 degrees.

  • Is any different between ECC 5.0 and ECC 6.0 for Excel export?

    Dear all,
    As you know, most standard SAP report allow Excel export. I just wonder is any different between ECC 5.0 and ECC 6.0 for excel report in standard SAP reports?
    In ECC 5.0, Reports in profit center accounting, LIS, or PA, etc. has their own different way to export to excel and is any improvement in ECC 6.0? I Thanks.

    In ECC 5.0, a lot of reports don't have Excel export function instead user has to go to system -> List -> Save -> Local file -> spreadsheet.
    I just wonder is any improvement in ECC 6.0? just like LIS report, user can select export -> Transfer XXL to either pivot table or just plain excel but the function only exist in certain reports in some modules and not all.
    Thanks again.

  • Different between work order closed and completed

    HI experts
    I would like to know what is different between closed work order and completed on SAP PM Module.
    regards
    nasser

    See this conversation:Completed is technical comptete (TECO) - the technician has done his/her work, closed is settled and done also from an accounting perspective (settlement)
    PM Work Order TECO and CLSD
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/3158261

Maybe you are looking for

  • MacBook Pro "15 2011 model has started crashing. Symptoms: screen distortion/images fragmenting/blue screening. Help!

    Hi everyone! I currently own a Macbook Pro '15, 4gb that was purchased in early 2011 running Snow Leopard (my version is currently 10.6.8). For under the past 3 year it has been heavily reliable, and I have not ran in to any software, or hardware iss

  • Logging into Oracle Apps R12 throws error - unable to authenticate session

    Hi All, Working on R12 OS:AIX Logging into Oracle Apps R12 throws error - "unable to authenticate session". Earlier Guest user was end-dated which has now been removed and autoconfig was run.but still the same issue..(services were bounced too) Guest

  • Contract to invoice error plz help me out

    Hi SAP Gurus, Plz help me out to allow mixed billing on the same contract. We currently can’t invoice the customers who have chosen prepaid for their program line and after that when the prepaid finishes it automatically goes to post paid. And the in

  • Bw 7.0 urgent

    hi all,          after creating data source i specify excel file path and activate it when i click on priview data then data show in this format ÐÏ à¡± á           Í É€ Í É€                      ÿÿÿ can any body tell me reason behind it

  • Request to server failed-message I get when trying to publish to MobileMe

    Hi-I am having issues with my iPhoto '09 publishing to MobileMe Gallery. I have had 2 chats with MobileMe technicians and after a lengthy discussion it appears that it's a problem with iPhoto '09. I get a message that the request to server failed. It