Different clearing rules in SAPF124

Hi Gurus,
usually we use the filed ZUONR as automatic Clearing rule for GR/IR account.
Now we have a Company code, which has a another Content in this field. We could use fields EBELN and EBELP.
The rules I store in customizing..are they like "and-rules" or is this like an "or" - this is because we can not set the rule by company code and of course we still need the ZUONR rule... so if it is an "and" we don't have a chance here anyway...
2.) Any suggestions how to solve it?
Many thanks in advance!
Sandra

Hi Sandra
The conditions in OB74 are "AND" conditions.
Since, we cannot set the criteria at company code level, I would suggest that you use different G/L accounts for the purpose of different criteria.
Since, COA has a vast number of G/L accounts, you can look for some G/L numbers which are not used in any other company code as of now and use them for your purpose only in this particular company code after configuration.
Regards
Sowmya

Similar Messages

Why we use different clearing account for GR/IR and planned cost clearing a

My client ask for using same account for GR/IR account and all planned cost clearing account.
i try to convince it should be different accounts but he needs a logical answer.
Why we use different clearing account for GR/IR and planned cost clearing accounts?

Dear friend.
u just tell him while doing GR it will debited n while doing IR it should get credited.hence we need to take diff G/L account or same account.
regds
nasir

FICA: Clearing rules for account maintenance & auto clearing to apply credits against unpaid security deposits regardless of due date

Hi Folks,
We have a requirement in FICA clearing rules to apply the payment against unpaid security deposit irrespective of the due date. I have the below rule configured as the first step in my clearing variant.
Grouping String: 019 (statistical indicator); Grp Rule: 3; Char Value: H (security deposits); AIRI: 4; Group: 019
Sort characteristic: 010 (Due date); Rank: 3; Char value: H; Rank: 1
I have maintained the corresponding clearing variant in all the clearing types (account maintenance, automatic clearing, and incoming payments); Clearing rule is working perfectly during payments, however for account maintenance and automatic clearing it's not applying the credits against security deposits first. I still see that the items are cleared only based on due date;
Am I missing something here? Please share your suggestions.
Thanks,
Santosh

Santosh:
This rule will not work in account maintenance. You would need to include the data about the credits into your grouping criteria in order for that to work. Most clearing rules do not work for account maintenance as they do for payments. You probably need to have a separate variant with a rule not based on statistical indicator, but rather based on transaction value or maybe create your own custom grouping via TFK116.
regards,
bill.

FICA: clearing rules to applying payments against unpaid security deposits regardless of due date

Hi Folks,
We have a requirement in FICA clearing rules to apply the payment against unpaid security deposit irrespective of the due date. I have the below rule configured as the first step in my clearing variant.
Grouping String: 019 (statistical indicator); Grp Rule: 3; Char Value: H (security deposits); AIRI: 4; Group: 019
Sort characteristic: 010 (Due date); Rank: 3; Char value: H; Rank: 1
I have maintained the corresponding clearing variant in all the clearing types (account maintenance, automatic clearing, and incoming payments); However, I still see that the items are cleared only based on due date;
Am I missing something here? Please share your suggestions.
Thanks,
Santosh
Moderator update - question solved with FICA: Clearing rules for account maintenance & auto clearing to apply credits against unpaid security deposits regardless of due date
Message was edited by: William Eastman

Santosh:
This rule will not work in account maintenance. You would need to include the data about the credits into your grouping criteria in order for that to work. Most clearing rules do not work for account maintenance as they do for payments. You probably need to have a separate variant with a rule not based on statistical indicator, but rather based on transaction value or maybe create your own custom grouping via TFK116.
regards,
bill.

P2P fulfillment and Clearing rule interaction

Hi,
I am facing an issue related to Promise to Pay (P2P).
We are using FP2P1 to create P2P. The open items listed in FP2P1 creation screen appear to be sorted based on net due date (ascending), document number( ascending), amount (descending). The user selects the open items from the top and downward, until the promised amount is exhausted. When the payment is posted, the clearing sequence configured in the clearing variant is that first by the cash discount due day (ascending), division (ascending) and main transaction (ascending). Therefore, the payment would clear the items that not included in the P2P, however, the fulfillment is calculated based on the each P2P item's clearing status. For example, the customer has promised to pay $200. P2P includes document A, B, C for the total of 200. The customer paid $200 before the check date. However, the payment has cleared document A, D, E. When the P2P is evaluated, it is not fulfilled because only document A is cleared.
I would like to sort open items in the FP2P1 creation screen in the sequential order that is consistent with our clearing rule. I checked event 182 to 191, but not sure if one of them is called at time of open item selection. Do you think it is possible to add open item sorting logic in event 187?
Thank you very much for your help.
Jennifer

Hi Amlan,
Thank you for your suggestions.
Our clearing rule reflects the regulatory and business requirements and therefore we cannot change it. If we create P2P based on the standard SAP open item sorting logic, and then clear them first, it would violate our clearing rule.
I do not quite understand your suggestion - "The P2P items against the customer account can be put on direct debit". Could you please elaborate it if you get a moment? Thank you!
I just received SAP's reply to my OSS message. Below is the reply:
"I checked the situation in our reference system and I found out that
the displayed fields of the open item processing in transaction fp2p1
results from customizing (under FI-CA=>Basic Functions=>Open Item
Management=>Define Line Layout Variants for Open Item Processing).
Unfortunately there is no possibility to define a default sorting
variant. Also in the open item processing itself is no option to
define a default sorting. As the functionality does not exist I
recommend you to fill a development request. In SAP note 11 you'll
find more information about it."
Jennifer

Different Distribution Rule on Outgoing Payment cannot be split on Journal

Hi All,
I created an Outgoing Payment for Vendor for several invoices. Each invoice was assigned to different Distribution Rule. But the journal created summarized all the invoices (only one row for debit AP), and no distribution rule was assigned. Is this a bug? Anybody ever experienced the same problem?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Marini

Hi Gordon,
I am working with version 2007 A PL 42.
I found that Distribution Rule on Outgoing Payment is for Discount purpose. When we fill Discount then it will be posted to Discount Account with Distribution Rule defined.
Thanks,
Marini

Need userexit / badi / bte to enhance the automatic clearing rules

Dear All,
My requirement is to enhance the automatic clearing rules for tcode ff_5.
Program RFEBKA00 will upload bank statement items based on the external transaction codes provided by the banks .
The standard posting rules will clear a GL bank account using a set of algorithms for further interpretation set of standard algorithms do not meet the clearing criteria.
Hence I need userexit / badi / bte to enhance the automatic clearing rules. EXIT ZXF01U01 / FEB_BADI are triggering before posting the document.
So we cannot use these. Please suggest me regarding the same.
Thanks in advance
Somu.

Hi,
Did you get a solution for this problem from any other means? Cause I am also facing the same problem. It will be great if you can help me in this regard.
Thanks
Sudheer K

Clearing rules

Dear colleagues,
I'm using clearing rules to clear customer open line items. I've defined one for deudor accounts. I tested for a manual payment and it worked correctly, but when I tried to test it for an automatic payment, It didn't bring me all the fields that I defined in the clearing rule to the cleared line item.
Do you know why it doesn't work for all the fields in automatic payment program?
Thanks in advanced,
Olga

Step 1 should probably not sort by invoice number. That is not usually sequential for a utility. And then it would basically be the same as step 2 which should work.

Document Clearing Rule

Hi,
All Experts.
I want to what is clearing rule in FI ( OBIA & OBIB )? In mysystem OBIA is blank but in OBIB it is showing in Account Type K and clearing Rule is CH where it is not define in OBIA. So from where it come exactly ? I am facing one problem that when I am posting one clearing entry through F-04 i am getting Mesage Class X short Dump. I am not able to solve that Short Dump.
I thought it may be generating more line items which is overflowing by system and having relation with clearing rules , specifically summarization of line items !
Could any one focus on this ?
Your help will be great on this.
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.
Edited by: Sharvari Joshi on Feb 17, 2010 5:32 PM
Edited by: Sharvari Joshi on Feb 17, 2010 7:11 PM

Experts please help.
Regards,
Sharvari Joshi.

Clearing Rules for Defferals

We have requirement where if the deferral date is populated in the document or item then any incoming payment should not clear that item or document in cases where deferral date is in future,
Any item with no deferral date should clear, any excess payment should be posted as on account payment,
deferral items or document should only clear if the deferral date is in the equal to or less than to system date
I need help in setting up clearing rules to support above requirement, please extend your help.

Hi,
If you are unable to get the desired result through configuration, then code custom program logic in FI-CA Event 110 to distribute your incoming payment amount.
In this Event, you can inspect for the attributes of the items to be cleared (e.g. Deferral Date greater than payment date), and decide on the amount to be posted as Payment on Account.
If you are not familiar with FI-CA Events, go into transaction FQEVENTS and read the function module documentation for Event number 110.
Regards,
Ivor M.

Automatic Clearing Rule for Customers

Hi,
I have a query regarding Automatic clearing rules for the Customers.
I want to clear all the debit balances against all credit balances for each customer (irrespective of the assignment). The exact amounts are not matching though.
Can this be configured for Cusomers in 'Automatic Clearing Rules'?
Please Advise.
Thanks in Advance,
Safi

Hi,
You can use the transaction code F-32 to clear debit and credit items of a customer account. You can only clear open items from one account. You can use this function to clear debits and credits that balance to zero (for example, invoices and payments that have already been entered into the customer account).
Reward points if it is helpful.
Thanks
Ram

Clearing rule in FICA

Hi,
In my current project there is a clearing rule to clear the open amounts.
suppose customer has two open items:-1. Electric bill(enery bill):-$100
2. water heater(non-energy bill):-$50
If customer pays $50(exact amount of water heater) then first water heater bill will be cleared.
If customer pays $70 then electric bill will be cleared.
I want to know are there any standard fuction module or program which decides which amount will be clear first? or it is totally controled by SPRO confiuration?
Thanks
Soni

1
For clearing you use the transaction F.13 and use the option G/R account special process. In this case the field assignment field is not important.
An other option to Prepare Automatic Clearing and set up ther for the GR/IR account a rule based on PO an PO line item number
There are to sort keys for PO's use the ome with order / line item
Paul

EC-PCA: Different assessment rules by materials

One of objective of our PCA implementation is to split values by brands. It is possible with the use of profit center (PC) assignment in material master. But... We have some materials which can't be unambiguously assigned to PC. I.e. when one material used for different brands (for example: Packs). The possible solution here is to have "central" PC, which periodically should be settled to brand PCs using some allocation rules.
The question here: how can I setup different rules depending on material? I mean that different materials should have different settlement rules (for example: Material A should be settled 50/50%, Material B should be settled 20/20/60%). How it can be reached without creation of separate PCs for each material?

> In case you want different % for each material, you need to
> write different segments in the same cycle, where you
> differentiate material based on the cost element/gl account.
You're right. We want different % for each material. But we can't differentiate material based on the cost element/gl account. G/L under material movement transaction usually means type of operation. So, if we, for example, write-off raws to manufacturing usually the same G/Ls/Cost Elements are updated. But we still need different split for different raw materials as they used in differenet proportions in brands. Unfortunately on Assessment/Distribution maintainance screen we don't have material field for Sender selection. So, the question is, how can we differentiate these materials in other way?

Invoice reference field in Clearing rules

Hi
I am trying add field REBZG-Invoice reference in OBIA t.code (Clearing rules for GL) . Requirement is while clearing the document system has to post separate clearing document for each invoice.
Then system saying field not permitted.
Pls advice
Thanks in advance
Sneha

Hello,
In the customer master set the grouping KNB1-ZGRUP
Also select "single payment" check box.
Regards,
Ravi

Different rounding rule by customers

Hi all,
I have a quiestion about rounding rule.
Is there any way to change rounding rule to total price after tax by customers?
I understand rounding rule can be controled by condition type. However, I am looking for a way to apply a different ronding rule in each sales by customers.
For example, for a sales order from a customer A, I'd like to have its total price after tax to be applied "commercial" rounding rule.
but for a sales order from a customer B, I want it to be "round up".
Both customers maintain a same pricing procedures and everything. Only different should be its rounding rule as I prefer.
I truely appreciate for your help.
Thank you very much.
Misaki
Edited by: Misaki Nagaya on Jul 30, 2010 10:43 AM

Hi Rajesh,
IMG  Personnel Time Management  Time Data Recording and Administration  Absences  Absence Catalog  Absence Counting  Rules for Absence Counting (New)  Define Rules for Rounding Counted Absences
V_T559R
In this step, you set rounding rules for absence and attendance counting.
If you specify an hours or day multiplier for counting attendances and absences, the values determined can have several places behind the decimal point. It is difficult to use these values for quota deduction and payroll. In this step, therefore, you set rules for rounding the values.
You use concrete numbers for the rounding rules and can specify whether you want:
Only values within the specified interval to be rounded or the interval to be rolled
The specified upper and lower limits to be included in the calculation
You can specify several subrules for a rounding rule and number them sequentially. The system runs through the subrules in sequential order until it finds one that applies.
Example
For absences, you use a counting rule that is counted using an hours multiplier of 80%. You want whole numbers (full hours) to be determined in counting.
Define a rounding rule
With a lower limit of 0.5 (inclusive)
With an upper limit of 1.5 (not inclusive)
With a target value of 1
You want the rule to be rolled, that is, to apply also to the following intervals:
1.5 - 2.4 (rounded to 2)
2.5 - 3.4 (rounded to 3)
and so on.
If you have any query's on this pls ask me.
Thanks and Regards,
Revathi.

Different clearing rules in SAPF124

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for