Different display oddity on New iMac i5 27" : moire/pixel shading

Hello,
I just got my iMac Core i5 and I'm happy to say I have not had any of the many display problems that others seem to have.
However I have noticed a display oddity that's quite subtle but bugs my eye nonetheless:
It's easier to see in the grey of the window tops, the Safari window is a perfect candidate. You have to be staring at the screen pretty closely. You can only see it while moving your head, oddly enough, or moving the window. On my display it's most prominent at the top of the display and it fades out completely by the bottom. It looks like the grey goes pixelated in mini checkerboard pattern, almost a moire. It's not just the grey or the window, I believe it is visible in any medium dark solid color.
I've seen it on other, older, iMacs, and I had come to think of it a side effect of the cheap 6-bit TN panels they were using on the older iMacs but this panel is supposed to be a good IPS 8-bit. Also, I cannot see the effect on a 24" Core Duo 2 2.93Mhz. Could it a difference in video card, nVidia VS ATI perhaps ?
It's not terrible for normal use but it keeps catching my eye as I move my head to look away from the screen so it's becoming a bit annoying.
Anyone seeing what I'm seeing ?
Is the problem with my eyes ?
Can anyone shed any sort of technical explanation ?
Should this be considered a defect ?
Thanks

Indeed it's not. But I don't think it qualifies as something to worry about either. While I suspect others may be able to see what I'm seeing it doesn't seem to be something that gets noticed. Indeed I wouldn't be surprised if most wouldn't notice at all.
Don't let me spoil your expectations as one may be driven to look for minute imperfections once one knows where to find them. Those computers are nothing short of marvelous. I'm a pixel-peeping photographer and I had been looking forward to those LED lit displays for even and consistent colors. They deliver a great image, I might simply be starring to closely at it.
I'm not about to send mine back with this a defect I was mostly curious as to how noticed of an effect it is, if it is apparent to most people and what it could be caused by.

Similar Messages

  • How can i use my old iMac as a extended desktop display for my new iMac?

    I recently purchased a 21.5 in iMac and wanted to use my old iMac as a extended desktop. My new iMac has thunderbolt and USB 3.0 connections while my old iMac has firewire (400 and 800), USB 2.0 and mini-DVI. Is this posible?

    Welcome to Apple Support Communities
    If your iMac has got Mini-DVI, you have a 17, 20 or 24-inch iMac that doesn't support Target Display. Late 2009 and Mid 2010 27-inch iMacs, and iMacs with Thunderbolt can be used as external displays. Read > http://support.apple.com/kb/PH11302?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US
    If your old iMac doesn't support Target Display mode, you can use ScreenRecycler to use your old iMac as an extended display for the new iMac. The only thing you need is that both Macs are connected to the same network

  • Mac mini with a 24" display or a new iMac 24"?

    Hi,
    Since Apple releases the new iMac, and at the same time, updated the mini, I'm wandering where my heart should go.
    I like the iMac, a little bit more powerful, better video card and not sharing memory with main memory, better BTO (bigger HD, faster HD too, memory, etc) iSight and mike, and so on so on. I have not seen one yet, but I'm still puzzled by the glossy screen. Many article I read said that it is a like or not based on personal taste and environment you put it in. I bought a Sony display 2-3 years ago, which I returned, because of the glossy screen. The images were very clean and very fun too work on, but I could not endure to see my face in the screen continuously. That's what I'm afraid about the new iMac.
    So far so good, I read the article on http://www.macworld.com that compare the new mini C2D with an iMac, and while it is less performant it is still a good performer. Only a few points below the iMac. So...
    Choosing a mini with a 24" of my choice with the same resolution as the iMac will cost me around the same (maybe a few hundred $ less), but I'll have a smaller/slower HD and not a dedicated video card. I'm wandering if the larger screen resolution will affect the mini performance? Sure, for the HD space, I can use an external HD on firewire. Maybe even boot from it and use the internal and slower disk for backups (like TimeMachine for instance).
    I do not play game, or very occasionally, I'm doing iLife/iWork stuff, and Internet surfing. I want the larger screen, as I like to have spaces to play with, but I'm afraid the mini will suffer the higher resolution.
    In the long run, the display will stay mine, when I ever decide to change my computer, while buying the iMac mean I'll drop the display and buy a new one. There's pros and cons to all of this...
    So I'd like to heard from people having the new (or even older) mini to let me your impression of what you feel about this.
    Thanks in advance.

    If you are not able to actually examine an iMac carefully before you buy, the risk that the glossy screen may not suit you is a real issue which has to be considered. Imagine that you bought one and found it to have the same problem as the Sony display you tried and had to return?
    Ultimately, the actual performance of the system is remarkably unimportant in most situations. The majority of users and uses would not show markedly different operability between a brand new Mac Pro and older G5, even though in terms of specification and benchmarking, the two are like chalk and cheese. The fact is that while the Mac Pro would be greatly faster, OS and software, not to mention the user him or herself, are all quite inefficient.
    What that means is that the difference in performance between the iMac and the mini is certainly measurable, and in use would show itself in some ways (the iMac would run smoother for example) but without the ability to sit them side by side, as a user you'd really never know. Bearing in mind that the new minis are way faster than the old G5s which were themselves screamingly fast when they were in production (and still are), it's hard to imagine that a mini would fail to impress.
    And since the actual performance of the system isn't all that crucial, what IS vital is to ensure that the system you buy is usable. The devices that matter most in that respect are the bits you, as the user, interface with. Keyboards and mice are reasonably cheap and easy to change, but displays are not when they are fixed and integral to the system.
    The downside of the mini is twofold: Firstly that the internal drive is 5400rpm, thus relatively slow. In reality this really doesn't matter all that much, particularly not if you go for 2Gb RAM. It's been criticized for it's speed, but on the other hand, it's the same as the best laptops, users of which don't seem to have problems with the drive speed. It can be got around of course with a fast external drive, used to boot the system.
    Secondly, the integrated graphics - not because that's really limiting in any absolute sense (except for gamers) but because as time goes by, more and more of the top-end software is likely to exclude systems with integrated graphics from their minimum specification list. There aren't many like that yet, and it's hardly likely to be a widespread problem, but it does mean you have to consider what software you want to run as part of the equation.
    If I were in your situation, I'd not consider spending money until I had looked at the iMac and given myself some time to work with one. The fact it has a glossy screen doesn't mean it WILL have the same problem as the Sony display had, and slight changes in the ergonomics of your desk with the iMac on it rather than the system with the Sony display previously may mean that even if it did prove reflective, it may be far less of a problem (or more of course). I would look to buy the best system with the best specification that fit within my budget (after all, it has to meet your needs for some time, even as they change), thus if the iMac screen was good, that would be the system I'd go for. If there were any sense that the reflective properties of the screen were going to be a problem, I'd dismiss it as an option immediately, and focus on either the lowest cost Mac Pro if one of those were within the budget, and if not, a Mac mini with bumped up RAM and your choice of screen.

  • How to use my broken Imac as a second display for my new IMAc

    Hi everyone !
    I have a old Imac Imac 24" Intel Core 2 Duo 2.16GHz 2G
    One day I was watching a video from youtube and It frozen. After that When I start the computer I get the Apple sound and a grey screen.
    I send it to Apple assistence They said it could either be the the main board or the video board.
    As they don't have this parts anymore couse it's a old Imac version, they can do nothing to help or make sure.
    So I have this machine side by side with my new Imac 21.5 inch 2.5ghz Intel core i5
    So is there a way to make it as a second display? Or do anything with it?
    Obs: I used a ethernet cable to erase my Imac 24 and now I getting the grey screen with a file Icon with (?) inside
    Please don't tell me to trow it way.....
    Hope to get some help.
    Fabrício Giugni

    Hi,
    I am getting the this:
    Hardware test does not support this machine.
    When I bought This computer it came with OSx 10.4.7
    Few weeks later Came out OSx Leopart 10.5 And the store gave me a update disk as a gift.
    When Osx snow Leopard came out I bought it.
    So my machine is ruining with Snow Leopard 10.6.8
    When I try to run Hardware test from Snow leopard, nothing happens, also nothing happens to update disk. It only load hardware test from the first Cd that came with the computer. OSx 10.4.7
    So After it load, it asked to choose the language and O got the this:
    Hardware test does not support this machine.

  • Can I use my old 2006 iMac as a second display for my new iMac?

    Can I use my rusty old 2006 iMac as a second display for my new 2012 iMac?  How do I keep one computer from trying to take over the other one?  thank you.

    Try ScreenRecycler, the 2006 does not support display input.

  • How do I connect my 17" Apple display to my new iMAC?

    I just got a new iMAC and want to hook my existing Apple 17" Display from my PowerMac G4 for dual monitors, but I am lost on what connectors I need and will the iMAC be able to power it?

    You should have a Firewire 800 port and a Thunderbolt port.
    The easiest way would be to use the Firewire 800 port.
    You will need a 9 pin to 4 pin Firewire cable. These are available here.
    http://www.monoprice.com/products/subdepartment.asp?c_id=102&cp_id=10301&cs_id=1 030104

  • Why is Best for Display setting in new iMac with Retina 5K Display only 2560 x 1440?

    I just saw the new iMac with 5K Retina Display. It's awesome! I do have one question, though: The default (Best for Display) resolution is 2560 x 1440. That is the same as my current LED Cinema Display. Adjusting the scale in the System Preferences/Display settings maxes out at 3200 x1800, not 5120 x 2880. I'm not sure why the highest scale option isn't the full resolution of the display. Can anyone explain this or direct me to an article that does?

    That got my curiosity too. It's something about the retinas pixel density per inch being higher than other displays, such as a Cinema HD.
    The "Best (Retina)" option says "Looks like 2560 x 1440" when you roll over it, but the real pixel density is actually doubled I think, so 5120 x 2880.
    The "Looks like..." phrase seems to refer to the size of elements on the screen rather than actual pixels. Perhaps that's what some folks call virtual pixels.

  • Resolution Problems with 30-inch Apple Display and my new iMac

    I'm not very good at computers, so I could use some help. I just bought a new iMac 24-inch, 3.06 Duo and I have an Apple 30-inch display I had connected to my MacBook Pro. Now I can't get a resolution better than 1280x800 and the cinema screen flickers a bit. I bought a mini-DVI to Dvi Adaptor. What else am I doing wrong? The display is enormous on the cinema display and I need to use that for my photography. Help anyone, please?

    i'm not sure if you area sking this... but it seems like the info about the iMac is not to do with the problem, but your problem is with the 30 inch screen and the macbookPro?
    If you are asking about a macbookPro plugging into the 30 inch screen, these should be able to run full resolution from what i remember,
    you need to check that you are NOT trying to run mirrored desktop as this will limit the resolution to the maximum possible of the smaller display (your macbookpro) which will mean you can only go up to 1280x800 but if you uncheck the 'mirror display' option you should be able to set independent settings for each screen.

  • I have a 27" imac.  Can I use it as my display for the new imac pro?

    Can I attach  my 27" imac to the new imac pro and use it as the display?

    This should answer your questions. http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3924#1

  • Does older cinema displays connect to new iMacs

    does older cinema displays connect to new imacs

    Yes. Use a Mini DisplayPort adapter for that type of display.
    (96831)

  • Is the Macbook Pro Retina display better than the LED display on the new iMac that is coming out?

    I am thinking of either buying the Macbook Pro retina display (15") or waiting for the iMac 27" display. I am mainly focusing on the display, so what is better?

    vinay.sujan wrote:
    Is the MacBook Pro Retina display resolution of 2880-by-1800 a strain on the eyes as I understand the higher the resolution the more strainful the screen can be to the eyes?
    Well there are two or three causes of eyestrain with displays different people seem to have.
    1: Small type/UI elements
    2: Glossy screens
    3: Flicker rate
    1:
    The higher pixel rate combined with the display set at the higher resolution is going to cause UI and type to be smaller and harder to see. In fact it's advised to set OS X to a lower resolouton so it upscales better to match the pixel of the higher display.
    Reports coming in say watching HD 1920 x 1080 trailers on the anti-glare 17" is best as the pixel content matches the display almost fullscreen, where on the MBP-R it's upscaled and thus looks blurry.
    HD content makers are NOT going to change all their video cameras to support 2880 x 1800 full screen, so in order to get a clearer image playing HD 1080 content, one will have to do so in a smaller window.
    2:
    The new MBP-R dispalys are 75% less glossy, but not 100% less glossy like the anti-glare models so this can still cause some people problems. This can be lowered to under 1%, however I'm suspecting to do so would be considered giving up a military advantage to China where Apple gets it products made.
    3:
    I don't know about the flicker rate if it's better or not on the MBP-R's than the previous screens.

  • Adding 30-inch Cinema display to a new iMac. Not getting full resolution.

    I have just bought a new 27-inch quad core imac i5 and have added my old 30-inch cinema display (five years old) as a second monitor but the resolution is poor - 1280 x 800 compared to 2560 x 1440. How do I improve the resolution as it's almost not worth having?

    You need to use a dual-link DVI adaptor to get a higher resolution from that display.
    (53141)

  • Display problems with new iMac 24" (March 2009)

    I just got my new 2.93 GHz 24" iMac last Friday, March 13, 2009.
    I've been noticing that there are some weird things happening as far as the display is concerned. The screen images/words are "jumbled" and overlapping. This is happening in all windows; Safari, Finder, System Profiler, etc.
    When I scroll, the screen becomes jumbled and unreadable. Once I pass the mouse over the affected area however, the refresh seems to correct the issue. Very annoying.
    Anyone having a similar experience?

    The +Help & Terms of Use+ link over the right has instructions for including images.
    Did you try resetting PRAM?
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1379
    If that does not help, try resetting the SMC (power management) by precisely following this procedure.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1543
    (Basically unplugging all the cables from your iMac, including power, and reconnecting.)

  • Is there different software installed on new iMac from Bestbuy vs Apple store? I purchased new 27 iMac and cannot find NUMBERS, PAGES or KEYNOTE

    Purchased new 27 iMac and cannot seem to find PAGES, NUMBERS or KEYNOTE programs. I installed OS X MAV and still cannot find them. In the app store they cost money.

    They need to be downloaded; you can use this in case they do not show up on your Purchases list:
    http://www.apple.com/creativity-apps/mac/up-to-date/

  • Can I use a 30" Apple Cinema display with a new 27" iMac?

    I have a brand new iMac(27-inch, Late 2013), OS X Mountain Lion (10.8), i7 3.5 GHz, 32MB RAM, 4GB NVIDIA.  I will soon be upgrading it to Mavericks, if that makes a difference.  My understanding is that the resolution on it is 2560 x 1440.
    I'm looking at buying a used 30" Apple Cinema display.  I'd like to use it with my new iMac.  The only advantage for me would be that the 30" screen is larger and things on it easier to see (or so I'm guessing).
    I need to know if the 30" Cinema display would work with my new iMac, and if it would, as I'm guessing, give me a larger, easier-to-see screen.
    I currently have my new iMac connected to my old mid-2010 iMac as a target display (that old iMac has a minidisplay port--no Thunderbolt), and that works great.  I just want a larger screen.
    I called Apple support, and the tech rep wasn't sure it would work.  He seemed to think that the 30" Cinema displays were made with different connections.  Some had minidisplay ports (which he thought would work), and some a cord built into them that provided some other type of connection (that I guess would not work as far as he knew).
    Can anyone tell me if this would work?  Would my new iMac and its video card support the 30" Cinema display?  Would the result be as sharp and good-looking as my iMac's built-in 27" display, but only bigger (which is what I'm hoping for)?  Any advice is appreciated.
    I don't yet know many of the specifics of the 30" Cinema display I'm considering.  I know it is about 3 years old.  And here is a picture of the back of it:

    Yes, you should be able use the 30" Cinema Display with your new iMac without problems. You'll need a mini-DisplayPort to Dual-Link DVI adapter:
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB571Z/A/mini-displayport-to-dual-link-dvi-ada pter
    I haven't had the 30" myself to test so I don't know if there any caveats. Perhaps someone else here will have personal experience.
    Regards.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error when using format mask to create download link in report

    I'm following these directions to create a download link in a report region. http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23903_01/doc/doc.41/e21674/advnc_blob.htm#HTMDB25905 ######### Table Structure... desc document_library Name Null Type DOC_ID NOT NULL VARCHAR2(40

  • RSCRM_BAPI removing filters of View for File Extract execution.

    Hi folks, I m working on BI 7.0. I have a view , which has poor performance, as query based on DSO , I want to execute the view in background with a variant. I created an extract using a variant In RSCRM_BAPI. But in output i can see only those value

  • To the JDev Team - Issues with JDeveloper 9.0.2

    Hi, We've recently upgraded from RC2 to Oracle9IDS. Although RC2 was a bit buggy, we managed to work around things and hoped that Release 9.0.2 would save the day. Alas, it doesn't seem as if it was meant to be. I have a EJB project I've been trying

  • Multicolumn Listbox not more than 32 Symbols?

    I have a Multicolumn Listbox. In the first row, I have a symbol (the diamond). Configuration of the Listbox is done via the frontpanel editor. Data is inserted programmatically, as well as the size, visibility and colors of the symbols are set progra

  • How  we get the component at front or back in a Jpanel

    How we get the component at front or back in a Jpanel. I want to manage the Z-axis position of the components in the Jpanel.