Different fiscal variant for same controlling area

Hi,
as my client requirement is having 3 company codes two having same fiscal year variant another having different fiscal year for legal requirement operating under same same county.
i have maintain all the setting for the 3 company codes but .
but when i enter to maintain controlling area OKKP.
system is throwing following error.
Differing fiscal year variants: V3 - ZP
Message no. KT297
Diagnosis
Fiscal year variant V3, controlling area SQRE, does not agree with fiscal year variant ZP, company code 3000.
The following entries must agree:
u2022 Same number of posting periods (the number of special periods may vary)
u2022 Same period limits
Procedure
Ensure that the fiscal year variants of the controlling area and the assigned company codes agree. If necessary, maintain the fiscal year variants.
Please suggest me how to proceed further in this case.
thanks
kareem

Hi Kareem
What you are doing is not correct
All comp codes under the Contrr Area must have same FYV and same Ch of accounts
1. Go to IMG and assign same FYV to the 3rd comp code
2. Go to IMG > FI (New) > Global Settings > Ledgers > Define and Activate Non-Leading Ledgers
Here, activate parallel ledger for this 3rd comp code and assign the other FYV in the parallel ledger
Also maintain the Doc No ranges for parallel ledger because your FYV will be different between Main and Parallel ledger
br, Ajay M

Similar Messages

Could I set up 2 different CCode belong to 1 Controlling Area

Hi All
Could I set up 2 company code with different chart of account belong to 1 controlling area?

Hi,
Basic point to use same controlling area ... u should use same chart of accounts, fiscal year variant.
Any of the above coditions are not satisfied, in that case u r not allowed to use same controlling area for different company codes
all the best
Prasad

COPA Assessment Cycle using KEU5 for multiple controlling areas

Hello All,
There is an organization with operations in several countries. There is a separate controlling area for each country. There is one controlling area, for instance, for Germany and another for Netherlands.
A problem is encountered while executing transaction KEU5 for multiple controlling areas in parallel. For instance, when one user from Germany executes KEU5 for an assessment cycle for Germany controlling area and at the same time another user from Netherlands tries to execute KEU5 for a cycle for NL controlling area, the user from Netherlands encounters an error message u201C'Cycle XXXX 01.02.2008 cannot be started because run group 0000 is locked'.
Apparently SAP allows assessment cycles for exactly one controlling area to be executed together. This poses a problem since the organization plans to implement SAP in several other countries (There will be one separate controlling area for each country as per the organization structure adopted by the company).
Any ideas, views or suggestions on the aforesaid issue would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Soumya

Hi Soumya,
Did you find any text in SAP Documentation saying that "SAP does not allow cycles belonging to different controlling areas to be executed at the same time"...?
Pls find the following text from SAP Help...
Parallel Processing of Cycles of an Allocation Type
Use
Parallel processing of cycles results in considerable time savings. To process cycles of one allocation type in parallel, they must be assigned to different cycle run groups.
You define the cycle run groups in the cycle header data. You also assign cycles to the cycle run groups in the header data.
To process the cycles of a cycle run group in parallel, start the cycles one after the other, if required, in different sessions.
You are carrying out a cross-company code cost accounting and want to perform the actual assessment in the individual company codes in parallel. Create a cycle run group for each company code and assign the appropriate cycles to these groups. You can then carry out the actual assessment in the individual company codes in parallel.
When you execute a cycle, you can start a consistency check. The system checks whether you are allowed to execute the selected cycles in parallel.
Though I didn't come across such requirement, I feel, my earlier suggestion will work out...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Differing Fiscal year for Accounting & Tax purposes

What procedure needs to be followed in ECC 6.0 when the fiscal year for accounting purposes and the fiscal year for taxation purposes are different.
For Accounting - Jan to Dec: For taxn - April to March.
How to accomplish the same?
One should not extract two different financials and merge it manually. Is there any other way out?

Hi Smurthi
If my understanding is right - Your company books fiscal year is Jan to Dec and for country like India the tax book is to be maintained from April to March
If this is what you are in need off - its very well possible using Special Purpose Ledger.
Once this is configured - you will have two books as the period stated above.
Any transaction posted in SAP will go to your regular book and special purpose ledger.
At this point if you open any posted document using FB03 etc - go to the Environment -> Document Environment -> Accounting Document - you can see the Special purpose ledger document also
Warm Regards
Bala
Edited by: Balasubramanian Nagarajan on Jul 5, 2008 9:30 AM

How to create two different implementation class for a Control

Hi,
I am a newbie to beehieve. I want to know that is it possible to create two different 'Impl' classes for a Control. If yes then how do we instantiate them ? How can we chain them (something like calling one 'Impl' from the other one? Thanks in Advance!!!
Regards,
Abhishek

You are sure you are in the right forum?
This is the JDeveloper and ADF forum...
Timo

Prcessing KEU5 transaction for multilple controlling areas in parallel

Hi,
I have executed KUE5 transaction with an assessment cycle for a controlling area and when i try to execute the same transaction with an assessment cycle for another controlling area in parallel, there is an error message 'Cycle YOCETEST2 01.02.2008 cannot be started because run group 0000 is locked'.
Please provide me a solution to execute the assessment cycles for multiple controlling areas in parallel.
Regards,
Satish.

Hello,
Are you able to solve this? I am getting this error sometimes when the transaction KSV5 fails.
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Rushi

Quality info records: different pack configurations for same raw material

how can i differentiate different pack configuration for same raw material in quality info records, as one might approved and the other not? that is, besides creating different material master for each packaging?
thanks
Alisa

You need to use the MPN profile functionality that is a standard part of SAP.
In Config under the purchasing define the MPN profile. There are several options you can turn on/off including info records.
You assign the MPN profile to your material. It now is considered by SAP to be an internal material number.
You then create a HERS material type for each separate manufacturer material number you have. You only need the purchasing view for these materials. You can also create purchasing text views, classification and some others if you wish.
In the SAP approved vendors list (AVL), you then assign each manufacturer vendor(s) with the HERS material created.
You create a Q-info record for each manufacturer/HERS material combination.
Now, when you specify the internal material number in a PO, the system will tell you to order the MPN material. When you do the drop down for the material now, it will show you the approved manufacturers allowed in the AVL for the ordering plant.
When the 01 inspection lot is created you will have a vendor number as well as a manufacturer's number in the inspection lot. The DMR can be done by the manufacturer or the vendor depending on how you set up the inspection plan. Q-info record will be used accordingly.
Take a look at it and research it. It's not hard to set up.
FF

Default values for the controlling area and language

Hello
I have a query.
I need to set default values for the controlling area and language in the screen
"find account assignment data 1"
Is it possible to do so?
Thanks.
Jayawant Gokhale

Hello
To clarify,
This is the search used ,when I go for shopping.For the Cost assignment,the fields controlling area and language should be default for a user.
Could someone throw a light on this.
Thanks.

Can we have different output types for same document?

Hi,
Can we have different output types for same doucument.if yes plz describe the steps to perform it
Thanks

Hi,
Generally you can use same out put type for the different document types of PO. You can create different out put types for the same PO, in case you need different layouts that is different forms like MEDRUCK. Please refer below link to create out types . If you want that PO as fax or e-mail can use same out put type .Thanking you.
http://www.sap-img.com/materials/purchasing-tips.htm

Different sales organization single credit controle area

Hi,
Different sales organization single credit control area is it possible

Yes. It is very much possible & pratically used by most of companies using SAP.
Just go thru SAP documentation in this menu paths & you will understand.
1. IMG - Enterprise Structure - Assignment - Financial Accounting - Assign company code to credit control area
2. IMG - Enterprise Structure - Assignment - Sales and Distribution - Assign sales area to credit control area
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Company codes with different fiscal year variants in a controlling area

Hi all,
When I try to assign a company code with different fiscal year variant than controlling area I get error. It is ok so far.
However, after assigning company with same fsv to controlling area the system lets me to change company code's fsv in company code global settings and I can even save it.
So I wonder how it would be possible ? Why do I get just a warning instead of an error and save ?
Thanks and regards.
M.Yusuf Dogan

Hi Bulut,
There are 12 normal and 3 special periods in the fsv of the company code which i'm trying to assign. However, controlling area's fsv has 12 normal and 4 special periods. I get an error message "KT297".
Actually, my point is that if the company code's fsv is same with co's I can assign but the system lets me change cc's fsv after assignment.
M. Yusuf Dogan

Same operating concern for multiple controlling area

Dear all,
We have a senario in which multiple controlling area is defined with multiple currency. Is it feasible to use same operating concern or different.
Thanks & Regards,
Vishal

Hi
As long as the Fiscal Yr Variant is same between the two, you can use same Op Concern
I dont think the above reply is valid because in my opinion, there is no restriction with regards to Currency
br, Ajay M

Different query plans for same query on same DB

Hi,
HP-Ux
Oracle Database 10.2.0.4
We are experiencing a strange issue. One of our night batch process is taking invariably more time to execute. The process does not consume time at 1 particular query. Everyday we find a new query taking more time than previous execution.
Now, when we see the explain plan while the query is executing, we see NESTED LOOP SEMI (with improper index being used). At the same time if we take the query and see the explain plan seperately, we get HASH JOIN SEMI (with proper index being used). Also, if we execute this query with the values as in procedure, it finishes within mili seconds (as it should).
The tables and indexes are analyzed everyday before the process starts.
Can anybody explain, why the same query shows two different plans at the same time ?
Thanks a lot in advance :)

Aalap Sharma wrote:
HP-Ux
Oracle Database 10.2.0.4
We are experiencing a strange issue. One of our night batch process is taking invariably more time to execute. The process does not consume time at 1 particular query. Everyday we find a new query taking more time than previous execution.
Now, when we see the explain plan while the query is executing, we see NESTED LOOP SEMI (with improper index being used). At the same time if we take the query and see the explain plan seperately, we get HASH JOIN SEMI (with proper index being used). Also, if we execute this query with the values as in procedure, it finishes within mili seconds (as it should).
The tables and indexes are analyzed everyday before the process starts.
Can anybody explain, why the same query shows two different plans at the same time ?As already mentioned, you might hit typical issues in 10.2: The column workload based SIZE AUTO statistics gathering feature and/or bind variable peeking.
How do you analyze the tables and indexes before the process starts? Can you share the exact call with parameters?
Some ideas:
1. If your process is "new", then the column workload monitoring of the database might recognize the column usage pattern and generate histograms on some of your columns. It might take a while until the workload has been established so that all columns got histograms according to the workload (It needs a certain number of usages/executions before the workload is registered as relevant). Until then you might get different execution plans each time the statistics are refreshed due to new histograms being added.
2. If the default 10g statistics gathering job is active, it might gather different statistics during the night than your individual job that runs prior to the processing. This could be one possible explanation why you get different plans on the next day.
3. "Bind Variable Peeking" is possibly another issue you might run into. How do you test the query so that you get a different, well performing plan? Does your original statement use bind variables? Do you use literals to reproduce? Note that using EXPLAIN PLAN on statements involving bind variables can lie, since it doesn't perform bind variable peeking by default.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Why two different explain plan for same objects?

Believe or not there are two different databases, one for processing and one for reporting, plan is show different for same query. Table structure and indexes are same. It's 11G
Thanks
Good explain plan .. works fine..
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 12,775 Bytes: 184 Cardinality: 1
     27 SORT UNIQUE Cost: 12,775 Bytes: 184 Cardinality: 1
          26 NESTED LOOPS
               24 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 12,774 Bytes: 184 Cardinality: 1
                    22 HASH JOIN Cost: 12,772 Bytes: 178 Cardinality: 1
                         20 NESTED LOOPS SEMI Cost: 30 Bytes: 166 Cardinality: 1
                              17 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 19 Bytes: 140 Cardinality: 1
                                   14 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 16 Bytes: 84 Cardinality: 1
                                        11 VIEW DSSADM. Cost: 14 Bytes: 37 Cardinality: 1
                                             10 NESTED LOOPS
                                                  8 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 14 Bytes: 103 Cardinality: 1
                                                       6 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 13 Bytes: 87 Cardinality: 1
                                                            3 INLIST ITERATOR
                                                                 2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSODS.DRV_PS_JOB_FAMILY_TBL Cost: 10 Bytes: 51 Cardinality: 1
                                                                      1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX DSSODS.DRV_PS_JOB_FAMILY_TBL_CL_SETID Cost: 9 Cardinality: 1
                                                            5 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSADM.DIM_JOBCODE Cost: 3 Bytes: 36 Cardinality: 1
                                                                 4 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX DSSADM.STAN_JB_FN_IDX Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
                                                       7 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) DSSODS.DRV_PS_JOBCODE_TBL_SEQ_KEY_RPT Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
                                                  9 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSODS.DRV_PS_JOBCODE_TBL_RPT Cost: 1 Bytes: 16 Cardinality: 1
                                        13 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSODS.DRV_PSXLATITEM_RPT Cost: 2 Bytes: 47 Cardinality: 1
                                             12 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX DSSODS.PK_DRV_RIXLATITEM_RPT Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                                   16 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSADM.DIM_JOBCODE Cost: 3 Bytes: 56 Cardinality: 1
                                        15 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX DSSADM.DIM_JOBCODE_EXPDT1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
                              19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSODS.DRV_PS_JOB_RPT Cost: 11 Bytes: 438,906 Cardinality: 16,881
                                   18 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX DSSODS.DRV_PS_JOB_JOBCODE_RPT Cost: 2 Cardinality: 8
                         21 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) DSSADM.Z_PK_JOBCODE_PROMPT_TBL Cost: 12,699 Bytes: 66,790,236 Cardinality: 5,565,853
                    23 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX DSSADM.DIM_PERSON_EMPL_RCD_SEQ_KEY Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
               25 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE DSSADM.DIM_PERSON_EMPL_RCD Cost: 2 Bytes: 6 Cardinality: 1                                                        This bad plan ... show merge join cartesian and full table ..
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 3,585 Bytes: 237 Cardinality: 1
     26 SORT UNIQUE Cost: 3,585 Bytes: 237 Cardinality: 1
          25 NESTED LOOPS SEMI Cost: 3,584 Bytes: 237 Cardinality: 1
               22 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 3,573 Bytes: 211 Cardinality: 1
                    20 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN Cost: 2,864 Bytes: 70,446 Cardinality: 354
                         17 NESTED LOOPS
                              15 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 51 Bytes: 191 Cardinality: 1
                                   13 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 50 Bytes: 180 Cardinality: 1
                                        10 HASH JOIN Cost: 48 Bytes: 133 Cardinality: 1
                                             6 NESTED LOOPS
                                                  4 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 38 Bytes: 656 Cardinality: 8
                                                       2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE REPORT2.DIM_JOBCODE Cost: 14 Bytes: 448 Cardinality: 8
                                                            1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX REPORT2.STAN_PROM_JB_IDX Cost: 6 Cardinality: 95
                                                       3 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX REPORT2.SETID_JC_IDX Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
                                                  5 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE REPORT2.DIM_JOBCODE Cost: 3 Bytes: 26 Cardinality: 1
                                             9 INLIST ITERATOR
                                                  8 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE REPORT2.DRV_PS_JOB_FAMILY_TBL Cost: 10 Bytes: 51 Cardinality: 1
                                                       7 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX REPORT2.DRV_PS_JOB_FAMILY_TBL_CL_SETID Cost: 9 Cardinality: 1
                                        12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE REPORT2.DRV_PSXLATITEM_RPT Cost: 2 Bytes: 47 Cardinality: 1
                                             11 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX REPORT2.PK_DRV_RIXLATITEM_RPT Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                                   14 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) REPORT2.DRV_PS_JOBCODE_TBL_SEQ_KEY_RPT Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
                              16 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE REPORT2.DRV_PS_JOBCODE_TBL_RPT Cost: 1 Bytes: 11 Cardinality: 1
                         19 BUFFER SORT Cost: 2,863 Bytes: 4,295,552 Cardinality: 536,944
                              18 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE REPORT2.DIM_PERSON_EMPL_RCD Cost: 2,813 Bytes: 4,295,552 Cardinality: 536,944
                    21 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) REPORT2.Z_PK_JOBCODE_PROMPT_TBL Cost: 2 Bytes: 12 Cardinality: 1
               24 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE REPORT2.DRV_PS_JOB_RPT Cost: 11 Bytes: 1,349,920 Cardinality: 51,920
                    23 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX REPORT2.DRV_PS_JOB_JOBCODE_RPT Cost: 2 Cardinality: 8

user550024 wrote:
I am really surprise that the stat for good sql are little old. I just computed the states of bad sql so they are uptodate..
There is something terribly wrong..Not necessarily. Just using the default stats collection I've seen a few cases of things suddenly going wrong. As the data increases, it gets closer to an edge case where the inadequacy of the statistics convinces the optimizer to do a wrong plan. To fix, I could just go into dbconsole, set the stats back to a time when they worked, and locked them. In most cases it's definitely better to figure out what is really going on, though, to give the optimizer better information to work with. Aside from the value of learning how to do it, for some cases it's not so simple. Also, many think the default settings of the database statistic collection may be wrong in general (in 10.2.x, at least). So much depends on your application and data that you can't make too many generalizations. You have to look at the evidence and figure it out. There is still a steep learning curve for the tools to look at the evidence. People are here to help with that.
Most of the time it works better than a dumb rule based optimizer, but at the cost of a few situations where people are smarter than computers. It's taken a lot of years to get to this point.

Screen Variant for table control in FB60

Hi ,
I need to create variant to show Quantity and Base Unit of Measure columns in the table control which is available at the first screen of FB60 . I tried using the option screen variant - > create variant. i couldnt see the options of colmuns properties for table control on click that small icon available at the right conner. Pls guide.
Thanks

In transaction SHD0 you need to create a new variant.
After that you will be taken into FB60.
Press Enter as if you are trying to process vendor invoice. It will take you to a screen "Screen values 1100 Program SAPMF05A"
There you will have 3 columns Output only, Invisible and Mandatory.
Select as you want.
Just try out carefully, you will be able to get the desired result.
It is very difficult to guide you in details.
Please let me know if you face any problems.
Rgds,
Harmees

Different fiscal variant for same controlling area

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for