Different Invoicing Vendor
Hi,
We want to raise a Purchase Order to Vendor 1 & do the Invoicing to Vendor 2.
We want to maintain the Vendor Code in (Partner Function) data in the Vendor Master Record.
How can we configure the Scenario in SAP?
Please guide.
Regards,
Configure Partner determination
1. SPRO --> Materials Mangemnt ...> Purchasing ...> Partner Determination
A. Define Partner role
B.Define Permissible Partner Roles per Account Group( In this step, you can specify for each account group of the vendor which roles the vendor may assume.)
C.Partner Settings in Vendor Master Record
In this section, you define partner determination schemas and assign them to account groups.
D.Define Partner Schemas
In this step, you define partner determination schemas.
E. Assign Partner Schemas to Account Groups
Thanks & Regards
Sudhansu
Similar Messages
-
Poss. to have different invoicing partys on 1 vendor for diff purch. orgs?
Hello!
We are running SRM 5.00.
I am a rather techy person and was given the task to link the invoicing vendor to a purchasing vendor on purchasing org level.
Everything I have found so far (table BUT050 and FM BAPI_BUPR_RELATIONSHIP_CREATE/CHANGE/GET/..) there is no way to link invoicing party on purchasing vendor on purch org. level, without mod's, because it is not part of standard functionality.
Could this be correct? Does all vendors in SRM have the same invoicing party regardless of purchasing org?
Thansk
nam
Message was edited by: Nam FritzHi Nam,
As per SRM 5.0 standard funtionality, you can have different invoicing party. You need to follow below steps-
1. logon to admin and click on 'manage business partners' and maintain here possible invoicing parties for that vendor.
2. You extend this vendor data to 'purchasing group'
In this way you can define same invoicing party for all vendors.
Thanks
Vikram -
Error in MIR7 - Different Material Vendor planned for del. costs item in PO
Dear All,
We getting error during MIR7.
We add two freight condtion ZFRO and ZFRT in purchase order as below :
ZFRO = we have add Rs. 350 against freight to Vendor(MATERIAL VENDOR)
ZFRT = We have add Rs. 100 for local freight which is paid to FREIGHT VENDOR directly (cash payment) i.e. paid for Transporter's Godown to our factory.
Now during MIGO, store department has enter as :
1. ZFRT (Freight Vendor - FREIGHT VENDOR)
2. ZFRO (Freight Vendor - MATERIAL VENDOR)
Now during MIR7 we are getting following error :
Different Material Vendor 300255 planned for del. costs item in PO 4500028018
(300255 is FREIGHT VENDOR which is at Number 1 in freight tab of MIGO)
Thanks and Regards,
NiravFor good and service,
In MIR7, select the option Goods/Service Item
First do only for Good/Service item...
After that, in MIR7 select only Planned Delivery cost and give the same PO number..
Then you will receive a pop-up message to choose vendor..
Here select one vendor and press continue..
Then save you invoice..
And again do the same and just select the other vendor..
You can see 3 invoice number in PO history..
One for goods charges and another two for freight charges.. -
Two different invoices created for one order for two different lines
Hi All,
I have an order with four line items that was shipped on the same day, invoiced on the same day and all lines have the same delivery number yet two inovices were created for this order..one for the first three lines and one for the last line.
Can anyone please explain what can cause this to happen?
Thanks
A/AHi Asgar,
If a single order has been split into two invoices, you should check the values of the mandatory columns. During Autoinvoice, the grouping is based on the madatory columns and also your grouping rules. If any of the mandatory column has a different value, it will split into different invoice.
Please refer the following metalink note for further details
Subject: How Autoinvoice Grouping Works
Doc ID: 98772.1
Hope that helps.
Thanks,
Anil -
Best practice for presenting different storage vendors arrays..?
Hi, can't seem to find a specific answer in writing on this.
Typical FlexPod already deployed, with different vsans on different n5ks.
Uplinks from UCS / NetApp are FCoE.
So I now want to present some normal FC (not FCoE, nexsan) storage to the same blades on the UCS system via the n5ks.
My main questions are can I use same vsans / vHBAs as for NetApp storage, or should you be creating different vsans and vHBAs for different storage vendors?
If multiple vsan is recommended, is Trunking multiple vsans over FCoE from UCS to FC fine, I'm sure it is but just want some experience on it.
Thanks!Thanks guys for the input, interesting to see there is a difference of opinion on this topic. Makes me feel happier that I'm not being too stupid and someones posted back a link to a best practice guide on the subject that I've blatantly missed! (still time for that no doubt!)
Like I've said, I haven't found anything specific in writing on this, but keeping vendors on seperate vsans / hbas feels like the best way to do it anyway with only a little extra config in the grand scheme of things. -
There is a type of partner to indicate a different supplier (vendor) for R
There is a type of partner to indicate a different supplier (vendor) for RFQ. How can I use the partners (ex. by plan) from agreement when I create RFQ in reference PReq with agreement like source of supply?
I defined OA for Ordering Address partner by plan for the agreement. I would like use the good partner by plan when I process a PReq (agreement with source supply) in RFQ.
Thanks - ReneThe Reset Firefox feature can fix many issues by restoring Firefox to its factory default state while saving your essential information.
Note: ''This will cause you to lose any Extensions, Open websites, and some Preferences.''
To Reset Firefox do the following:
#Go to Firefox > Help > Troubleshooting Information.
#Click the "Reset Firefox" button.
#Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is done, it will show a window with the information that is imported. Click Finish.
#Firefox will open with all factory defaults applied.
Further information can be found in the [[Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems]] article.
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us! -
Block the Vendor Invoice & Vendor Invoice Payment
Hi Experts,
I need more information about Block the Vendor Invoice & Vendor Invoice Payment.
and laso is there is any standard report is there to see the blocked invoices
ThanksHi Mazid,
In F110
On the Status tab, choose the Proposal (change) button.
Select All accounting clerks and choose Enter. The list of vendors and amounts to be paid displays.
To review invoices for a particular vendor, double-click that vendor's line. A list of invoices displays.
To block a particular invoice for the payment run, put the cursor on that invoice and choose the Change button.
Enter the payment block indicator and choose Continue.
To unblock a particular invoice for the payment run, put the cursor on that invoice and select the Change button.
Delete the payment block indicator and choose Continue.
Try MRBR for to Review and Release Blocked Invoices, you can also use transaction FBL1N to list the vendor open items and change the payment block within the transaction
Assign points if useful
Regards
Genie -
ME59N error "Contract vendor X differs from vendor Y" message number 06 047
Hello,
has anyone of you idea what could be the reason for that we receive every now and then in automatic purchase order run in ME59N an error message for a purchase requsition "Contract vendor X differs from vendor Y" message number 06 047
Also the purchase requisition in error (red) is displayed in the list under vendor Y even though agreement is for vendor X. In purchasing request agreement and fixed vendor X are displayed correctly.
The error does not appear in ME59N if we only select this one single purchase requistion.
Hope for your help and thanks in advance for any contribution.
Br
TS
Message was edited by: Jürgen LHello,
Yes, it seems like source is uncertain but cannot understand the reason because 20280 is only vendor for the material. For this same vendor there are three contracts where this material is included but only the latest one 4600000805 is valid.
I checked contract partners, no reference to the 197790 vendor or neither is there in vendor masters for 20280
and 197790.
Is there any way to simulate how SAP selects the vendor in background? And as I said in the afternoon run there is no error anymore or if me59N run for this specific purchase requisition.
Br
TS -
Fld selectn for mvt typ545 / acct differs for Vendor good Mv 014
While doing GR for Subcontracting order I am facing error"Fld selectn for mvt typ545 / acct differs for Vendor good Mv 014",how to resolve this error
go SA38 and run report RM07CUFA , it telks you for which fields the difference is there.
Then talk to your finance collegues and decide whether finance has to change the field selection for the account, or you have to change the fiel selection for your movement. -
Field selection for mvmt type 543/acct 895000 differs for vendor goods mvmt
Hi Pals,
While i post for goods receipt for subcontracting items, it is showing this error
" Field selection for movement type 543 / acct 895000 differs for vendor goods movement "
Kindly help me to resolve this plz.
Thanks&Regards,
PrasathHello
what you need to do is, run the program RM07CUFA check for the field status of the particualr movement type for which the system is throwing the error.
Note that if there is a mandatory entry under G/L account then it should be a mandatory entry under movement type field status also.
Go to FS00 and Select your GL account and click on Change Mode and in Create/Bank/Interest tab double n Field Status Group.
Then goto OBC4 and make the change in the field selection for the field status group you got from FS00 for that account. (make the vendor for goods movement as display/optional/required as in the movement type)
Also see the field selection for movement types in SOMCJ for movement type 543.
Regards -
Fld selectn for mvmt type 501 / acct 520075 differs for Vendor goods moveme
Hi,
When i do goodreceipt through 501 movment , I am getting the below error.
"Fld selectn for mvmt type 501 / acct 520075 differs for Vendor goods movement (014)"
Can you suggest , how to correct this.
Thanks and regards
Karthikeyanhi,
use mov type 561 .
or need to check account GL is correct or not .
regards,
sabs -
Field seection for mvmt type 702/acct 233000 differs for vendor goods movem
Hai Gurus
iam posting physical inventory differences in T.code MI07 for Consignment stock.it is giving error
"field seection for mvmt type 702/acct 233000 differs for vendor goods movement (014)".
can u pl help to resolve this
Thanks & regards
chandrahi
T.code SE38 Program RM07CUFA,Execute
Enter movemnt type 702, Special stock indicator P - pipeline
Company code
G/L account - 233000
Execute
now here check the mismatched field selections
refer following
Stock posting...
error in MB1a
regards
KI -
Is it possible to create different invoices for a single contract?
Hi All,
is it possible to create different invoices for a single contract?
My customer is asking an invoice per service line.
Thank you for getting back to me on this.
Kind regards
KKCan somebody please advice?
-
i combined 3 different invoices to create a single file,when the program is done combining the files it makes all the invoices the same,it does not have the other 2 invoices in it,makes 3 copies of the first invoice,why does it do that?
I was having the same problem. The trick is to flatten the forms before combining. It is in the tools - print production menu. If print production isn't there click on where I am indicating with the top blue arrow.
-
Vendor in Invoice different from Vendor in PO....How?
Hi all,
I got a situation where users are entering invoices for Vendors that are different from the PO. The Partner Function IP (Invoicing Party) of the Vendor in the PO is set as the same main vendor.
Example:
PO issues to Vendor 1000 (POrg 1000, CoCd 1000). Part Func IP(Inv Party) is also 1000
Invoice is created for Vendor 9000 (also maintained in CoCd1000 and POrg 1000) by user. Vendor 9000 is not used in any partner functions of Vendor 1000.
How is this possible in SAP ?
Any idea?
The only way I can think of is that the users are chaning partner functions.
Urgent.
Thanks in advance for any quick response.hi
As i belive you can change the vendor account code while doing the trax MIRO in the details tab there Invoicing Patner can be changed as we know that the goods supplier can be diffrent from the party which is raising the invoice against the goods supplied.
Regards
Sujoy
Maybe you are looking for
-
Java options: "Enable the next-generation Java Plug-in"
On windows, this option is sometimes "grayed out" and you cannot disable it. This option is available since java 6 u 10, and is accessible via windows control panel, or alternatively via javacpl.exe. Which are the cases where the option is grayed out
-
My macbook air makes a creaking noise
Does anybody else have this problem? I haven't noticed it when it's on a flat surface (but usually when I'm using it in a place where it's on a flat suface, it's noisier there), just usually on my lap. I'm sure it doesn't hurt anything, but it's real
-
How much to fix a cracked ipod touch screen
how much is it to fix a cracked ipod touch screen
-
Convert AS code to a Class?
Hi, hoping someone can help. I'm have some problems converting the attached AS file to a Class. Currently I add it to a movie using #include "AS/motion_tween.as" and then call it using mc.tweenMe("linear", "_y", 0, 100, 0.2); Feels a bit clunky thoug
-
DVD created in iDVD won't work in Mavericks
My husband and I are creating a DVD in IDVD which we have done successfully on my macbook . It plays fine on my computer and on dvd players.. But it won't play on my husbands computer which is on Mavericks.it just says supported disk not found. it w