Different levels of privel

I want to create a group having priv 15 for one NDG's and priv 7 (or below ) for another NDG.
In my current setup I have under teh
"Enable options" set up one ndg with priv 15 and another ndg with 7. I also have under "Tacacs+ settings" Shell ticked and priv 15 set.
This seems to override my Enabel options. How do I go abt. doing what I want .. priv 15 for one ndg and priv 7 for another?
Thanks

As far as I konw, this cannot be done. Having one level of priv for one set of Devices and another level for another set of devices. This is because each group can have only one level assigned to them.
Correct me if I am wrong. Or is there a way to do this?

Similar Messages

Display different level for same hierarchy value in BO 4.0

Hi Expert,
I have one question for Webi for BO 4.0
We have one hierarchy in BW side and we hope to display differet level in same report for different column
For example, column A is for level 6. column B is for level 7.
Do you know how to releaze this in Webi side?
In the 3.X version, we have different dimension for different level.
But now in BO 4, it has been combined into one\
Thanks and best regards
Alex yang

Hi,
You can still do this in BI 4.0, if you use the old 'legacy' MDX OLAP.unv from Universe Designer tool .
Yes, with the BICS connection, you are getting a native hierarchy, as it would be displayed in an OLAP environment.
Cheers,
H

OBIEE report from multiple facts at different levels

Currently we need to develop a report with columns from 3 different facts surrounded with conformed and non conformed dimensions at different levels.
After setting the hierarchial levels and putting the facts into single logical table with different sources OBIEE is generating 2 different queries and does a full outer join.
I would like to know how we can do a left outer join instead of full outer join between the 2 queries based on a common column?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Vinod,
The scenario provided in the link above doesnt match to my issue.
We need to develop a report from multiple fact tables at different levels with conformed & non conformed dimension columns.
I have 7 dimensions D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6 and D7 & two fact F1 and F2 tables.
F1 is tied to dimensions D1,D2,D3,D4,d5
F2 is tied to dimensions D3,D4,D5, D6 and D7.
In my report I have columns from D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6, D7, F1 and F2.
So OBIEE generates 2 queries with columns from D1,D2,D3,D4,d5 & F1 measure and another query with D3,D4,D5, D6, D7 and F2 measure.
and then does a cross fact join out of box between 2 queries.
But I need to do a left outer join between the 2 queries on a common column instead of cross fact join. I would like to know how we can achive this.
Thanks.

Displaying different levels of the same hierarchy in the different columns

I have a parent child hierarchy and wish to display different levels of the hierarchy in different columns of the resultset eg
level 1 level 2
Europe UK
Europe France
N America US
N America Canada
However writing MDX like the below
select
{} on 0,
([Geo].[level 1],[Geo].Level 2] on 1
from cube
results in the error "The [Geo] hierarchy is used more than once in the crossjoin
How can I get around this??

Hi,
You can make use of CrossJoin function in MDX, I give a sample MDX based on the AdventureWorks database:
select {[Measures].[Reseller Sales Amount]} on 0,
crossjoin({[Sales Territory].[Sales Territory Group].[Sales Territory Group].members},{[Sales Territory].[Sales Territory Country].[Sales Territory Country].members}) on 1
from [Adventure Works]
After execut the MDX you will get the result like this:
Reseller Sales Amount
Europe
France
$4,607,537.94
Europe
Germany
$1,983,988.04
Europe
United Kingdom
$4,279,008.83
NA
NA
(null)
North America
Canada
$14,377,925.60
North America
United States
$53,607,801.21
Pacific
Australia
$1,594,335.38
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

Essbase cubes with different levels of detail - OBIEE 10.1.3.4.1 on LINUX

Hi all,
I have BSO and ASO cubes which contain broadly the same information, but with the ASO cube at much higher detail. For simplicity sake, they only have 1 dimension, and 1 fact. The dimension a date and is structured like:
Gen2 = year
Gen3 = year & quarter
Gen4 = year & month
Gen5 = year, month & day
Only the ASO cube has Gen5. the BSO cube only has the information to Gen4 level.
I've imported them both into the RPD and dragged the ASO cube across into the BMM. and then taken the fact column from the BSO cube and dropped it onto the BMM, selected its new source ( the BSO cube ) and set the
Content tab and set the logical level as Gen4.
I then dragged the key items from the BSO date hierachy onto the date dimension in the BMM.
I purposely had a slightly different date hierachy and data content in the 2 cubes so I could tell where it was getting the data from.
If I select the year only...it gets the value from the BSO, and if I drill down to quarter and month it also gets the dates from the BSO cube.
If I select the data fact, it will switch to the ASO cube and retrieve the value from there.
Same applies if I select just the year - data comes in from the ASO cube.
So my question is this, how do I get it to select the data facts from the less detailed cube when the details is not required and only switch to the ASO cube when the extra detail is needed?
Thanks in advance for any assistance

Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Data fact with 2 sources, where source 1 & 2 have differing levels of detail, it always seems to take the data from the more detailed source

OBIEE Facts at different levels.

Hi,
I am bringing columns from three tables: Two facts and one Dimension table to create a OBIEE Report.
The fact tables Workforce Event Fact and Employee Daily Snap Fact are at different levels, but both of them have proper joins with Dimension Employee Dim.
When i am pulling columns from D1 and any one of these two facts, i am not facing any problem in seeing results. But when i bring columns from all of these three tables, i am getting this error,
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 15018] Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table Workforce Event Fact) does not contain mapping for [Employee Daily Snap Fact.Exempt Indicator]. (HY000)
Is there anything i have to do in Business Model layer to avoid this error. Many people suggesting to assign an aggregation level for these two facts. But i am not having any Dimensional Hierarchy defined.
Thanks
Swami

Hi swami,
Many people suggesting to assign an aggregation level for these two factsThis is a workaround i think where you need to create aggregate tables(not levels) and then use them for your purpose.(OR) you dint define the logical source table properly either correct it.
Another work around i could suggest is,take the 2 fact tables columns needed into one alias table and make it as fact and join this fact table to dimension table and you can get all columns.
Hope it helps you.
Best Wishes,
Kranthi.

Nesting of AGO or TODATE functions with differing level arguments is not supported

I have a column in BMM which calculates the Year-To-Date Sales. This function uses the ToDate function to caculate the YTD.
I need to develop another formula column which shows the last-year's YTD.
I develop this formula in BMM by AGO on the YTD column which already uses a ToDate function.
In BI Answers when selecting this column, results in the below message:
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 22044] Nesting of AGO or TODATE functions with differing level arguments is not supported. (HY000)

To reply to my own question. It appears I got it working, that is, the error message problem is solved, but I still have questions on how to use these functions.
To get it to work, I added the primary key D_TIJD.TIJDKEY at the level of the lowest grain in my dimension (level tab).
What I still wonder is how to make it select the right values. I have the following hierarchy: bookyear - bookperiod - week. A bookperiod contains 4 or 5 weeks (4,4,5 in a quarter), so 12 periods in one year. I defined a measure at period level and another at that level with the ago function, that should return the figures for that same period of the year before. My first question is, whether to go back 12 periods or 52 weeks (which is the lowest grain in my dimension)?
The second question is how to use a combination of TODATE and AGO so that if I calculate the current period (of which only 2 weeks are passed), I also only want to include the same two weeks for that period one year ago in order to make a correct comparison. How do I do that???

Controlling the main time line of a movie via a button within a movie on a different level.

Hi there!
I have two movie is two different levels,
Level 5 is my base movie and I am loading another movie on
top of this into level 10.
Once the user clicks onto a button within the movie on level
10, I would like the animation in level 5 to stop (the animation
runs on the main root timeline of level 5).
Once the user clicks on a different button within the movie
on level 10, I would like the animation on the main timeline of the
movie in level 5 to start again from the point where it previously
left off.
Is this possible?
It would be great if someone could help me out with this.
Thanks, midi_ie

midi_ie wrote:
> Hi there!
> I have two movie is two different levels,
> Level 5 is my base movie and I am loading another movie
on top of this into
> level 10.
> Once the user clicks onto a button within the movie on
level 10, I would like
> the animation in level 5 to stop (the animation runs on
the main root timeline
> of level 5).
>
> Once the user clicks on a different button within the
movie on level 10, I
> would like the animation on the main timeline of the
movie in level 5 to start
> again from the point where it previously left off.
> Is this possible?
_level5.gotoAndPlay("someLabelframe");
Use your regular action to target timeline or movie clips,
just define the level number at the beginning of the path.
Pretty much it :)
Best Regards
Urami
!!!!!!! Merry Christmas !!!!!!!
Happy New Year
<urami>
If you want to mail me - DO NOT LAUGH AT MY ADDRESS
</urami>

Entering budget data on different levels

Dear experts,
I have a question concerning posting budget data on different levels in BCS. In Former Budgeting there was an automatic check for budget entry which was not allowing greater amounts on lower level commitment items than on higher levels.
Now with BCS there is not a hierarchical structure when entering budget data so you can enter a greater amount on subordinate commitment items than on superior ones.
Do you have an idea if the budget entered on the lowest level can be totaled up automatically to the higher levels of the hierarchy or consistency checks should be defined in order to control budget amounts on the different levels???
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
sappsm

Dear SAPPSM,
In the Budget Control System (BCS) there exists no hierarchical budget structure which would take into account some funds center hierarchy, for example.
This was standard function in Former (or Classical) Budgeting, but is not available in BCS only from EhP 603 on, you will be able to have multi-level budget structure but still in development phase.
As a consequence, when you enter budget, budget values are only created at the level of budget entry (for example, at the 3rd level). Furthermore, BCS does not provide functions like "Distribute budget"
or "Total up budget".
However, you can "simulate" a totalling up of budget values via reporting. For example, for Report Writer reports like FMRP_RW_BUDGET you can use funds center groups (FM menu, Master Data, Funds Center), created by transaction FM_SETS_FICTR1. You can use such funds center groups with the Report Writer reports, which then automatically sum up the budget values according to the funds center group.
BCS is a complete system with more possibilities than FB and you will be able to define strategy derivation for controling budget or posting address according to business process. Please check the documentation available in help.sap.com and in BCS node from SPRO configuration.
I hope I could help you
Kind Regards,
Vanessa.

Macro - multiply numbers at two different levels

Hi Folks,
I am trying to write a macro which takes KF at a detailed level and multiplies it with another key figure at a different level of aggregation. Any ideas in this direction will help.
A - B
KF 1 = 10 %
A - C
Kf 1 = 20%
A
KF 2 = 100
I want to write a macro that gives following result
A - B
KF3 = 10 ( 10% * 100)
A - C
KF3 = 20 ( 20% * 100)
Regards,
Sachin
Edited by: Sachin Ganesh Shetty on Feb 12, 2009 4:57 AM

Hi,
I had a similar requirement of running a macro at 5 level and use a data at 3 level as one of the inputs.
what i did was i wrote a Z function module which called /sapapo/msdp_data_read and retrieved the value at 3 level.
Thus i was able to extract a 3 level value and use it to run a macro at 5 level.
Please let me know if this helps.

Multiplying data at two different levels

I have Actual Forecast Bias data generated at a particular level (%Bias). I want to multiply this against other data that is at a different level in the same cube so as to adjust the forecast in line with actual performance. The Bias% data is at Battery Part# level. The data that I want to multiply it against is Appliance/Battery level. When I run it, the multiplication operates against a rolled up consumption level for all appliances that use a particular battery. I need the Bias % to operate at the battery level, not the rolled up level..
I'm a newbi at this so any help welcome
See the code below
FIX (Batteries, @IDESCENDANTS ("A Size Family"),appliances,ww,@idescendants(NA));
"New forecast %" = #Missing;
"Bias %" = #Missing;
"Bias %" = ("trade units" -> Actual/"trade units");
ENDFIX;
FIX("wif 1")
FIX (@LEVMBRS(appliances,1),@levmbrs(Batteries,0), @IDESCENDANTS ("A Size Family"),ww,@idescendants(NA));
"New forecast %" = consumption*"Bias %";
ENDFIX;
ENDFIX;
FIX("wif 1")
CALC DIM (WW, Supplies, Printers);
ENDFIX;

Hi Johnnie
I assume the important bit is the bit within the second fix:
"New Forecast" = Consumption * "Bias %";
The way you have your fix statement set up it is looking at level 0 members in your Appliances and Batteries dimensions (I'm reading your post as if they are separate dimensions). I assume your issue is that the one piece of data is at level 0 interesections of appliances and batteries but the other piece is not possibly at level 0 of one dimension and level 1 or higher of the other, Bias% being the one at the higher level?
If that is the case then I think you need to look at a way of getting from the level 0 member to the correct intersection point(s).
Have you had a look through the technical reference at functions like @PARENTVAL, @ANCESTVAL or the multidimensional options for the same @MDPARENTVAL and @MDANCESTVAL, it sounds like your formula needs to be something along the following lines
"New Forecast" = Consumption * @PARENTVAL(Appliances, "Bias%");
What the above would do differently to your original code would be to get the Bias % value from the parent of the current level 0 member of the appliance dimension being calculated. While this might not be exactly what your requirement is hopefully it will steer you in the right direction.
Hope this helps
Stuart

Substract as an aggregation rule for different level in a DIM ?!

Hi there..
I'm building a BI model based on financial transactions (incomes, expenses, etc..)
and my main problem is how to substract a measure, where the aggregation rule is set to SUM, for different levels in the "Account" dimension?
Example:
I have the "Account" dimension with the following hierarchy:
Account_ID / Account_name / Account_type / Account_total
And, lets say, 2 rows in it:
1.row in the "Account" dimension:
account_ID : 100
account_name : "Marketing expense"
account_type : "Variable expenses"
account_total : "Total profit" (total income - total Expenses)
2. row in the "Account" dimension:
account_ID : 200
account_name : "Financial incomes"
account_type : "Total incomes"
account_total : "Total profit" (total income - total Expenses)
"Total profit"
"Tot. incomes" "Tot. Expenses"
"Finan. incomes" "Market. expenses"
The fact table has just one measure: "Amount" and, of course, some foreign keys:
Account_ID -> "Account" dim
Organization_ID -> "Organization" dim
Date -> "Date" dim
Amount
The measure "Amount" in the fact table is positive both for expenses and incomes.
Now, what I'm trying to do is to sum up that measure on my top level in the "Account" dim.
At that level my report in Answers should substract "Total expenses" from "Total incomes"!
How can I do that?
thanks..
Ivan

Sorry to pop the obvious question, but can't you model that nicely and put it into distinct columns?
If not, you can create derived measures on you fact using "case when" statements. One for the incomes with amount > 0 (or >=0 ...depends on where you want to have the 0's) and one for the expenses with amount < 0.
HTH,
Chris

Use of BPMN diagrams on different levels (Business Process Architect 11gR1)

I have an issue regarding the representation of different levels of diagrams in BPA... I have been using following types of diagrams from the highest level to the lowest:
- Structuring model,
- Value-added chain diagram,
- Business process diagram (BPMN),
- Business process diagram (BPMN),
- Function allocation diagram (this is generated automatically).
Those levels are linked with use of "Assignment" function on individual elements and that enables the user to drill-down to the last level (except between Structuring model and Value-added chain diagram - I can't find a way to link those two).
As you might have noticed from the list of diagrams above, I have used two BPMN diagrams to represent two successive levels. Is this OK? On the first of those two diagram types, I represented activities with "Function" elements (I also used Start, Intermediate, End events and Rule elements).
I linked every "Function" element to a more detailed BPMN diagram on the next level. That one includes "Human task", "Automated activity" elements (and also Start, Intermediate, End events, Rule elements and also others) and is eventually meant to be transformed into BPEL.
That is how I understood the "Oracle_BPA_Suite_QuickStart_Sample_Guide.pdf" and samples included in Architect 11gR1. Is that the right way to do it? Does anybody have a better suggestion on how to represent the whole chain of diagrams?
How can "Assignees" be represented in the BPMN diagram, where I used "Function" elements? Is it possible to link "Structuring model" elements to Value-added chain diagrams?
I hope this describes my dilemma well enough and doesn't frighten you all away... I thank you all for your feedback in advance.

It is possible to assign Structural Elements to any Model Type in BPA. If you are not able to make this assignment it is not active in your Method Filter. You can log in with the Entire Method filter to check this out. You can also modify the filter you are using to include this ability.
The hierarchy you are using is fine and is a commonly used one. Some people use the EPC model, which is specifc to BPA and not a standard, at the level below the value-chain but many use BPMN as you have. If your intent is to use the first BPMN as a pure business process model then you may consider creating a separate custom Model Type, based on the BPMN model, with a scaled down set of allowable objects. This is also done through customizing the filter. If you do this you can also rename the model types in the filter if you wish to have different names at each level.
Note of caution, modifying a method filter can have impacts and should generally be done by someone with a working knowledge of the meta model. If you chosse to change a filter supplied with the tool, copy it and rename it, then update the copy. Always retain the original filter provided with the tool. If you are doing something as simple as adding the ability to use the assignment between Structural Elements and Value-Added Chain models, that would be no big deal. If you get into reusing object and model types that has more impact on the functionality of the tool.

One Dimension with Facts at different levels

I currently have a single dimension with 5 levels. I have two fact tables that both connect to the dimension table but at different levels.
For example. If we have a Dimension Country -> Region -> City and then two fact tables. One that has facts at the Region level and one that has facts at the City level.
Is there a way to be able to have an answer that contains facts from both fact tables. So if there was a fact from City and the Region level? Everything I seem to try does not work. Would I have to create an additional aggregate table that aggregates the City level data up to the Region? Or is there a way to show the data at the lowest level and show either nulls or duplicate values for the additional records.
Any help is greatly appreciated

This has helped a little. I am now getting values from both levels. However, because i am summing the two values. The value from the upper level is now summing duplicate values. For example.
Value 1 on its own
Level1 Level 2 Level 3 Value 1
1234 10 10 13.05
1234 20 10 70.00
1234 20 20 70.00
1234 30 10 105.00
1234 30 20 105.00
Value 2 on its own
Level1 Level 2 Level 3 Value 2
1234 10 10 0.50
1234 20 10 2.00
1234 20 20 2.00
1234 30 10 3.00
1234 30 20 3.00
What I am getting
Level1 Level 2 Level 3 Value 1 Value 2
1234 10 10 13.05 0.50
1234 20 10 140.00 2.00
1234 20 20 140.00 2.00
1234 30 10 210.00 3.00
1234 30 20 210.00 3.00
Desired Outcome
Level1 Level 2 Level 3 Value 1 Value 2
1234 10 10 13.05 0.50
1234 20 10 70.00 2.00
1234 20 20 70.00 2.00
1234 30 10 105.00 3.00
1234 30 20 105.00 3.00
Now, the problem with this is that Value 1 is a fact at Level 2 and Value 2 is a fact at Level 3. I have one dimension table and two fact tables. The join between the fact table for Value two and the dimension table is the same as the join between the dimension table and Value 1 only it is missing the last level of detail.
I have then set the logical table source content tabs for each fact table to the corresponding levels.
I thought this would be enough but i still don't get the desired result. I am not sure if this is possible with one dimension table.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Edited by: user10800227 on Jan 11, 2010 12:43 PM

Extract Data in Power Pivot from MDX with diffrentnt different Level of Hierarchy in MDX

Hi All,
My requirement is to extract the data form tabular model and put in power pivot,as all the measures calculation is present in model just extracting the aggregated data.
Issue is appearing on Rolling up the data, so is there any way to extract the data so that it will display the right data on different level. As per the below example on level 2 data is getting summed up which is not correct.
Ex:-
Level1
A
10%
B
20%
Level2
30%
Thanks Chandan

Hi Chandan,
According to your description, you create a SQL Server Analysis Services Tabular model and extract Data in Power Pivot from MDX, the problem is that the hierarchy data rolling up base on the hierarchy level, right?
I have tested it on my local environment, we cannot reproduce this issue. So as per my understanding, the issue can be cause by the hierarchy setting in your tabular model. Here are some links about how to create and manage hierarchies in a tabular model,
please refer to the links and check if the settings are correct.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-in/library/hh213003.aspx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKKNY1Vj_2c
If the issue persists, please provide us more information about you hierarchy creation steps, so that we can make further analysis.
Regards,
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Different levels of privel

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for