Different result froma same MDX

I'm using this MDX:
WITH
member [Measures].[RIGA] as [Commerciale].[Nominativo].CurrentMember.Name
SELECT {
[Measures].[RIGA] , [Measures].[Fatturato]
} ON 0,
non empty( [Incasso].[Mod Pag].Members, [Incasso].[Cond Pag].members, [Data].[Periodo].[Mese].&[2014]&[8], [Commerciale].[Nominativo].&[VALUEA] ) on rows
FROM [MYADSB]
if i run in query anylizer i have a result like this
All
All
Agosto
VALUEA
VALUEA
1,139
All
30
Agosto
VALUEA
VALUEA
1,139
RIBA
All
Agosto
VALUEA
VALUEA
1,139
RIBA
30
Agosto
VALUEA
VALUEA
1,139
if i run same MDX as a dataset in SSRS i have this results:
All
All
Agosto
VALUEA
VALUEA
1,139
RIBA
30
Agosto
VALUEA
VALUEA
1,139
RIBA
All
Agosto
VALUEA
VALUEA
1,139
RIBA
30
Agosto
VALUEA
VALUEA
1,139
The second row is changed from All 30 to RIBA 30, how it is possible?

i checked with sql profiler and the query are the same.
The dimension incasso is derived from this table
id
modPag
CondPag
BO30
BONIFICO
30
BO60
BONIFICO
60
BO90
BONIFICO
90
RB30
RIBA
30
RB40
RIBA
40
RB45
RIBA
45
RB60
RIBA
60
RB90
RIBA
90
using [Incasso].[Mod Pag].Members, [Incasso].[Cond Pag].members I should see 4 row
ModPag
CondPAg
All
All
All
30
RIBA
All
RIBA
30
but I see
MOdPag
CondPAg
All
All
RIBA
30
RIBA
All
RIBA
30

Similar Messages

Different result from same SQL statement

The following SQL statement brings back records using query
analyzer on the SQL server. However when I run it in a cold fusion
page it comes back with no results. Any idea why????????
SELECT COUNT(h.userID) AS hits, u.OCD
FROM dbo.tbl_hits h INNER JOIN
dbo.tlkp_users u ON h.userID = u.PIN
WHERE (h.appName LIKE 'OPwiz%') AND (h.lu_date BETWEEN
'05/01/07' AND '06/01/07')
GROUP BY u.OCD
ORDER BY u.OCD

Anthony Spears wrote:
> That didn't work either.
>
> But here is something interesting. If we use the dates
05/01/2007 and
> 06/01/2007 we get results in SQL Server Query Analyzer
but not using a cold
> fusion page. But if we use the dates 05/01/2007 and
09/01/2007 both get back
> the same results.
>
Are you absolutely, 100% sure that you are connecting to the
same
database instance with both CF and Query Analyzer? That kind
of symptom
is 9 out of 10 times because the user is looking at different
data. One
is looking at production and the other development or an
backup or
recent copy or something different.

Why do I get two different results from the same coefficients?

I am getting two different results from the Polynomial Evaluation function.
For the first one, I am getting the coefficients from a Polynomial Fit function. I feed the coefficients from the Fit function into the Poly Eval function and get the correct result of 12.8582 when I evaluate 49940.
For the second one, I create constant array of the SAME values that were returned from the Polynomial Fit function (i typed them in). However, I am getting an incorrect result of -120.7913 when I feed the constant array into the Poly Eval function when I evauate 49940.
How can this happen when I am using the same array values?
Attached is an image of what I am explaining.
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
polynomial_evaluation.jpg ‏213 KB

Hi Altran,
are you sure about using the "same" coefficients?
Did you compare them? Did you (atleast) set the display properties to 17 significant digits?
Please attach a VI instead of a picture...
Best regards,
GerdW
CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
Kudos are welcome

Different Results From V$Rman_Backup_job_details and V$Rman_Status

Does anyone know why I would get different results from V$Rman_Backup_job_details and V$Rman_Status on the same instance?
Image of Quries: www.hydell.com/OracleBackupDifferences.png
Dates Returned For Latest Backup
V$Rman_Status = 10/13/2011
V$Rman_Backup_job_details = 7/24/2011
Which view is the best to use for monitoring backups?
Thanks in advance for the help.
Rob

oracle.dba.89 wrote:
Please show the script and that might help look into this. Also the timezone of the OS shows EST. And cron shows the scheduled time at 12hrs. It should run at 12:00 EST hours and not GMT.
Also please post output for below queries. Are backups run from the same node? (If RAC)
select value from dba_scheduler_global_attribute where attribute_name = 'DEFAULT_TIMEZONE';
Hi,
This is the backup script
#Set Variables
ORACLE_HOME=/projects1/oramroprod/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_4
ORACLE_SID=MROPROD
PATH=$PATH:$ORACLE_HOME/bin
btype="FULL"
RMAN_BACKUP_LOC=/data1/RMAN/MROPROD
export ORACLE_HOME
export ORACLE_SID
export PATH
export btype
tag="$ORACLE_SID"_"$btype"
#Print commands and their arguments as they are executed
set -x
SDATE=`date +%m%d%y`
STIME=`date +%H%M%S`
DD=`date +%d%m%y`
#Create daily backup directories
mkdir -p $RMAN_BACKUP_LOC/datafiles_backup/bkp_${DD}
mkdir -p $RMAN_BACKUP_LOC/controlfile_backup/bkp_${DD}
mkdir -p $RMAN_BACKUP_LOC/arch_backup/bkp_${DD}
mkdir $RMAN_BACKUP_LOC/logs
#Take backup
rman target / nocatalog log=$RMAN_BACKUP_LOC/logs/rman_${btype}_backup_${SDATE}_${STIME}.log << EOF1
change archivelog all crosscheck;
run {
CONFIGURE RETENTION POLICY TO REDUNDANCY 1;
CONFIGURE DEVICE TYPE DISK PARALLELISM 2 BACKUP TYPE TO BACKUPSET;
backup as compressed backupset incremental level 0 database tag '$tag' format '$RMAN_BACKUP_LOC/datafiles_backup/bkp_${DD}/%d_%s_%p';
backup as compressed backupset archivelog all not backed up 1 times FORMAT '$RMAN_BACKUP_LOC/arch_backup/bkp_${DD}/ARCH_%d_%s_%p';
CONFIGURE CONTROLFILE AUTOBACKUP FORMAT FOR DEVICE TYPE DISK TO '$RMAN_BACKUP_LOC/controlfile_backup/bkp_${DD}/%F';
delete noprompt obsolete;
delete noprompt archivelog all completed before 'sysdate-2';
EXIT;
EOF1
This is not RAC.
SQL> select value from dba_scheduler_global_attribute where attribute_name = 'DEFAULT_TIMEZONE';
VALUE
GMT

Different results from all_objects

Can someone please explain me,
How it is possible to get different results from "all_objects", once I query it from "SQL Worksheet" and next time when I execute the procedure with the same query ?
The procedure is created by schema user (owner) and it's executed by it.
Same as the query.
I am querying for objects which belongs to other owners.
Is there a way how to trace which privileges are used for querying the "all_objects" ?
Any hint will be very welcomed ?

You are correct, sorry.
Oracle 11g EE 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production on Windows 2K8
I already lost my whole day, probably I will lost the weekend, too.
Here is the sample code:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE PROCEDURE1 AS
BEGIN
FOR c IN (SELECT object_name from all_objects d
WHERE d.owner IN ('DWH_CM')
LOOP
dbms_output.put_line(c.object_name);
end loop;
END PROCEDURE1;
Test
exec procedure1;
-- does not write anything in output and it is enabled
select object_name
from all_objects O
WHERE o.owner IN ('DWH_CM');
-- returns 99 rows
Edited by: user9377205 on Aug 6, 2010 9:06 AM

PreparedStatement & regular Statement - different results for same select

I was wondering if someone could either
i) try this out for me to confirm my results or
ii) let me know what I am doing wrong
I'm one of the developers on a product and am currently investigating localization for the Thai language...just checking to see that Java and Swing have no problems with it. The only bewildering thing which has happened is noticing that some values which are fetched from the database display in Thai perfectly and other values display as a garble. Sometimes the exact same column is displayed correctly in one part of the program but is not OK in another part. I think I've figured out what it going on and suspect a bug in Oracle's JDBC:
Some selects were configured as PreparedStatements and those return the Thai properly. The more common case however was for programmers to use a simple Statement object for their select and it is in those that the multi-byte strings don't get returned properly.
The following code shows the problem that I am experiencing. I am basically executing the exact same select in 2 different ways and they are both giving different results as long as the column being queried contains a Thai character. If someone could grab and check it out and let me know if they see the same thing, I'd appreciate it. Just change the column/table name and the username/password/databaseIP to get it to run.
<code>
import java.sql.*;
public class SelectTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
DriverManager.registerDriver(new oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver());
Connection conn = DriverManager.getConnection( "jdbc:oracle:thin:@10.4.31.168:1524:ora8",
"dms_girouard",
"girouard");
String sqlCommand = "select C0620_Title from T0620_SwSheet";
Statement statement = conn.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE,
ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY);
ResultSet resultSet1 = statement.executeQuery(sqlCommand);
while (resultSet1.next()) {
if (resultSet1.getString("C0620_Title") != null) {
System.out.println("resultSet1 Title = " + resultSet1.getString("C0620_Title"));
PreparedStatement preparedStatement = conn.prepareStatement(sqlCommand);
ResultSet resultSet2 = preparedStatement.executeQuery();
while (resultSet2.next()) {
if (resultSet2.getString("C0620_Title") != null) {
System.out.println("resultSet2 Title = " + resultSet2.getString("C0620_Title"));
catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(e.getMessage());
</code>

Hi Peter,
Are you using NCHAR column for Thai , or is your database character set set for Thai.
If you are using a NCHAR column for holding Thai data, then you have to use the
OraclePreparedStatement.setFormOfUse(...) before executing the select.
Regards
Elango. Hi Elangovan,
Thank you for answering.
The datatype on the column is VARCHAR2.
I did my initial tests without doing anything special to make sure the database is localized for Thai, and I was happy to find that almost everything still worked fine - I was able to save and retrieve Thai strings to the database almost perfectly.
The only problem I discovered was the difference between Statement and PreparedStatement selects on a column containing Thai. Colleagues of mine have said they see the same thing when testing on a Oracle database which has been configured specifically for the Thai customer.
I read somewhere that the current JDBC drivers are using an older version of the Unicode standard than the most current version of the Java SDK and that it was causing some problems with Korean. I'm wondering if maybe it's the same problem with Thai.

Different results of same calculation between SQL and PL/SQL

This SQL statement:
select 1074 * (4 / 48) from dual;Gives the result 89.5.
However this PL/SQL block
declare
    tmp     NUMBER;
begin
    SELECT 1074 * (4 / 48) into tmp from dual;
    dbms_output.put_line('Result '||tmp);
end;Gives a different result:
Result 89.49999999999999999999999999999999999996
If I change and give my variable tmp a precision and scale, say (38,36) then the result is 89.5.
Edit. I have done this on both 10g (10.2.0.4.0) and 11g (11.1.0.7.0) with the same result in both.
Edited by: kendenny on Jul 9, 2010 10:19 AM for additional information

What's your current NUMWIDTH value in SQL*Plus (I'm assuming you are using that as your tool)?
SQL> set numwidth 50
SQL> select 1074 * (4 / 48) from dual;
                                       1074*(4/48)
         89.49999999999999999999999999999999999996

Different result from Excel

Hi all,
I hv done some thing with Excel for example
=(42-40)/1.5 and result is 1.333333333
When I am doing same with Oralce in "select statement", it is giving some different result, which is given below.
select Round((42-40)/1.5,9) from dual
the result is 1.003769326
Can any one help in this regards
thx

My workout is as follows..
[b]I am using Oracle 9i.
SQL> select (42-40)/1.5 from dual;
(42-40)/1.5
1.33333333
SQL> select round((42-40)/1.5) from dual;
ROUND((42-40)/1.5)
1
SQL> select round((42-40)/1.5,9) from dual;
ROUND((42-40)/1.5,9)
1.33333333
SQL>

Different results for same query on different servers

1. database being converted from 7.3.4 to 9.2
2. query is executed on both servers
3. different results!
The tables and data are the same, and indexes are setup on new server. EXPLAIN PLAN was run on both but with (predictably) widely different results.
I know, not much detail here, but has anyone ever ran into anything like this?
Thanks,
Pat

Folks,
Here is the relevant information for this problem. The attributes have been changed for confidentiality. If you need any other information let me know.
Thanks,
Pat
Query:
SELECT
one,two,three,four,a.five,six,seven,
a.eight,a.nine,
to_char(ten,'99999.99'),to_char(eleven,'99999.99'),
to_char(twelve,'99999.99'),to_char(thirteen,'99999.99'),
fourteen,fifteen,sixteen,seventeen,eighteen,
nineteen,twenty,twentyone
FROM
table1 a,
table2 b
WHERE
a.five = b.five
AND one = 'X'
AND six = ' '
AND three != 12345
AND three IN
(SELECT DISTINCT
three
FROM table3
WHERE
one = 'X'
AND twentytwo = 'XYZ'
AND twentythree != 0
AND twentyfour != 0
AND twentyfive = 'Y'
AND (a.five IN
(SELECT DISTINCT
five
FROM table1
WHERE
one = 'X'
AND three IN (12345)
Table1:
one          varchar2(1)     not null     PK
two          varchar2(20)     not null     PK
three          number(5)     not null     PK
four          number(2)     not null     PK
five          number(6)     not null     PK
six          varchar2(4)     not null     PK
seven          number(4)     not null
eight          varchar2(8)     not null
nine          date          not null
ten          number(7,2)
eleven     number(7,2)
twelve     number(7,2)
thirteen     number(7,2)
Table2:
five          number(6)     not null     PK
fourteen     varchar2(5)     not null
fifteen     varchar2(5)     not null
sixteen     varchar2(2)     not null
seventeen     varchar2(35)     not null
eighteen     varchar2(4)     not null
nineteen     varchar2(2)
twenty     varchar2(1)
twentyone     number(6)
Table3:
one          varchar2(1)     not null     PK
twentytwo     varchar2(12)     not null     PK
two          varchar2(20)     not null     PK
three          number(5)     not null     PK
four          number(2)     not null     PK
twentysix     number(2)     not null     PK
twentyfive     varchar2(1)     not null
nine          date          not null
twentythree     number(13,8)     not null
twentyfour     number(12,8)     not null
twentyseven     varchar2(1)     not null
eight          varchar2(8)     not null
Explain - Oracle9i (default, with CBO):
SELECT STATEMENT
RECURSIVE EXECUTION SYS_LE_3_0
RECURSIVE EXECUTION SYS_LE_3_1
TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION
HASH JOIN
HASH JOIN
HASH JOIN
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_AB874A
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS
BITMAP AND
BITMAP MERGE
BITMAP KEY ITERATION
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_AB874A
BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
BITMAP MERGE
BITMAP KEY ITERATION
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6602_AB874A
BITMAP CONVERSION FROM ROWIDS
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX04
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6602_AB874A
TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE2
Query results - Oracle9i (with CBO):
X|A | 1| 0| 22| | 1|08-MAR-02|XYZ | | 24.00| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|B | 2| 1| 22| | 7|04-DEC-01|XYZ | | 3.25| 8.00| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|C | 3| 1| 22| | 1|14-AUG-02|XYZ | | 10.35| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|D | 4| 1| 22| | 6|11-JUL-02|XYZ | | .00| 13.90| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
(approximately 4550 rows returned)
Explain - Oracle9i (ALTER SESSION SET OPTIMIZER_METHOD=RULE;):
SELECT STATEMENT
MERGE JOIN
SORT JOIN
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
VIEW VW_NSO_1
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE3
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE3INDEXPK
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN TABLE2INDEXPK
SORT JOIN
VIEW VW_NSO_2
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
Explain - Oracle 7.3.4:
SELECT STATEMENT
MERGE JOIN
SORT JOIN
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
VIEW
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE3
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE3INDEX03
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN TABLE2INDEXPK
SORT JOIN
VIEW
SORT UNIQUE
TABLE ACCESS BY ROWID TABLE1
INDEX RANGE SCAN TABLE1INDEX03
Query results - Oracle 7.3.4:
X|A | 1| 0| 22| | 1|08-MAR-02|XYZ | | 24.00| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|B | 2| 1| 22| | 7|04-DEC-01|XYZ | | 3.25| 8.00| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|C | 3| 1| 22| | 1|14-AUG-02|XYZ | | 10.35| | |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|D | 4| 1| 22| | 6|11-JUL-02|XYZ | | .00| 13.90| |ABCDE|FGHIJ|AB|ABCDEFG |ABC | | | |
X|E | 5| 5| 23| | 1|22-FEB-01|XYZ | | 211.80| | |ABCDE|EFGHI|AB|HIJKLMN |DEF | | | |
(approximately 1150 rows returned)
Indexes (used):
TABLE1INDEX03     (three)
TABLE1INDEX04     (five)
TABLE2INDEXPK     (five)
TABLE3INDEXPK     (one,twentytwo,two,three,four,twentysix)
Discussion:
Notice the repeating result for X,E,5,5,23,.... in the Oracle9i retrieval using CBO.
The execution of this query returned approximately four times the number of rows as
Oracle 7.3.4 using RBO. This is a function of how many "fours" there are in table3
that have matching "threes and fours" in table1. If you put a DISTINCT clause at the
very front of the query (SELECT DISTINCT one,two,three ....) then the result is
accurate and the same as Oracle 7.3.4. In one execution of this query, 27,000 rows
are expected to be returned, but the server returned over 1 million rows!
When RBO was used on Oracle9i, the results were identical to the ones on Oracle 7.3.4.

To_char(adate,'dd.mm.yyyy')   returns different results from two oracle clients !!! Is it possible?

Dear all;
We have only one Database server with some IIS's   as web servers on front . Each web server has own oracle client software in order connect to central database..
The same following query used in C# code returns different results on each IIS server.(3 row, or not data found )
why?
select     *    from    aTable    where        to_char( adate , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) =   :search_date
regards
Siya

1006237 wrote:
If adate is of DATE datatype, it will most likely has the time component. Therefore your SQL below is unlikely to return any data.
select * from aTable where adate = to_date(:search_date, 'dd.mm.yyyy')
Perhaps.....
select * from aTable where TRUNC(adate) = to_date(:search_date, 'dd.mm.yyyy')
Hi,
not having any sample data from you I could not understand that you wanted to select the range 00:00:00 - 23:59:59 on search_date.
Your method might not be efficient if you have an index on adate.
Maybe something like this will be more efficient
select * from aTable
where adate >= to_date(:search_date, 'dd.mm.yyyy')
and adate < to_date(:search_date, 'dd.mm.yyyy') + 1;
If you search_date is 30-Aug-2013 it will get records where adate >= 30-Aug-2013 00:00:00 and adate < 31-Aug-2013 00:00:00, so any time of date 30-Aug-2013.
Try like this and let us know if you still have 2 different results.
Regards.
Alberto

Strange query plans, and so different results from a view.

In my database (11g), I have a currency exchange rate table, which contains all currencies and their exchange rate to USD. I need to have a number of different exchange rates - To GBP, EUR, etc...
To accomplish this I have created a view, which has one union statement of all the USD exchange rates, with the same data joined back on itself to give the exchange rates based on their exchange rate to USD - ie: SELECT b1.Date, b1.Currency AS FromCurrency, b2.Currency as ToCurrency, b1.Rate/b2.Rate as Exchange Rate FROM Rates b1, Rates b2 on b1.Date = b2.Date
This view works fine when I query it, and returns the data as I expect.
I have a second view that is joined to this view to give a return of the amount in each currency for reporting. This view seems to work correctly when I narrow down the search requirements and have a small set of data.
The issue I am having is when I query the second view and get it to return all the data. Instead of receiving 4 rows per transaction (I am only interested in 4 exchange rates for display) I typically receive up to 2 rows. The first record is for the conversion to USD, the second record is for the conversion to the supplied currency. The issue is that this exchange rate actually includes the aggregate for all 3 other requested currencies (not the USD).
So instead of getting something like:
Amt RC BC (Amt = Amount, RC = Reporting Currency. BC = Base Currency)
60 GBP GBP
80 EUR GBP
100 USD GBP
1000 ZAR GBP
60 GBP USD
80 EUR USD
100 USD USD
1000 ZAR USD
I get the following set of results:
1140 GBP GBP
100 USD GBP
100 USD USD
Has anyone come accross something similar or have any ideas on how I can resolve this?
Thanks
PS: I can get both sets of results from the same view depending on the filter criteria. Also if I convert the exchange rates into a table, it then returns the correct results as expected.

943081 wrote:
The idea is to seek help in solving the problem. I was hoping that perhaps someone had experienced the same thing - different results for "effectively" the same query:Well, that's the issue... without additional info, it's not clear what issue you were seeing.
SELECT * FROM view WHERE Date = '01 January, 2012'
verse
SELECT * FROM view WHERE Date > '31 December, 2011' ORDER BY DateNow it's a bit clearer. That second query is not "effectively" the same as the first query. If the date column is in DATE format, then you ought to have a to_date() around the date string to explicitly convert it into a date so you can do date-to-date comparisons correctly. Also, DATE datatype stores times as well as dates, so asking for data matching midnight of a specific date is different than asking for data greater than midnight of the previous day.
If the date string is a string, then ... well, the string "31 December 2011" is greater than the string "31 August 2013", despite it being an earlier date. This is why making sure you're using the right datatype for the job is important - a date is different to a string that just happens to contain a date.
DateID
I have no objection to using a Date but always struggle to understand what someone means when they tell me "06/07/2012" - granted if the day is above 12 or the same day and month I don't have a problem - but it still leaves 121 days a year that are confusing. sure, but just because you find outputting the display (or rather, someone else's output) confusing doesn't mean you still shouldn't use the correct datatype. Store things as a date, and you can then output it in whatever format you like. Try doing that with a string or a number.
Don't say it doesn't happen as I got a birthday card from a company in May this year when I have specifically entered my date of birth as being the 5 of a month (name drop down box on their website)!Just because someone else doesn't understand how to work with dates correctly doesn't mean you can't! It's not exactly rocket science, after all!*{;-)

Different results from MAX and Labview

Hi all,
We did an impact testing a couple of days ago, and I got very big acceleration (the peak is about 300g, which is much larger than the estimated value).
And then I tried a small imact test in the lab using a steel plate which is less than 1 lb to impact a steel ruler, I still got big peak number (more than 200g, which is impossible). And then I tried the small impact test again by using MAX, the peak number is about 12g, and the curve seems like pretty reasonable. I was wondering why I got different results by using MAX and Labview?
Also, sometimes when I connect the SCXI-1001 to the computer, it says the USB is malfuntion and cannot be recgonized by the computer, and turns out the driver file does not exists. But most of the time, it works very well and the driver file does exists. Why this happened?
Thanks.
Yuan

jyuan wrote: but I want to clike one "run button" and get data from strain gage, LVDT, accelerometer at the same time and our tesing duration is just about a few seconds. And also I didn't find a place where I can record the data in MAX
You can do that. A task can only have the same types of inputs, meaning Analog Input, Analog Output, Digital Input, Digital Output, etc. Different sensors are just read with Analog Inputs. So they all can be in the same task. In MAX, just set up a task a configure each channel as it should be. Then use that single task in your LabVIEW code.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

Select statement returns different results from 9i and 10g

Hi all,
Would appreciate if someone could help to solve this puzzle here:
I have the exact the statements running on Oracle 9i and 10g, why do they return different results?
Select unique(GroupDesc) , GroupSeq from Module where ModuleId in (Select ModuleId from User_Access where UserId='admin') and Status='A'
In Oracle 9i:
Both columns returned as follows...
GroupDesc | GroupSeq
In Oracle 10g:
Only one column returned, the column with unique keyword was missing...
GroupSeq
Could anyone enlighten me?

yes, the table structure... actually the CREATE TABLE statement...
with some sample data (INSERT INTO)
and the actual queries (both of them - copy-paste them from each separate environment)
you can use tags around the statements this will format it to a fixed font - making it easier to read
Edited by: Alex Nuijten on Feb 20, 2009 10:05 AM

How to execute 2 different application from same Application Server

Hi,
I would like to know that how to execute two different applications from the same Application Server with different databases?
We are using
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0
Oracle Application Server 10g 10.1.2.0.2
Regards,
Hassan

what type of applications you want to run from the same application server, Hassan?
What other DB are you using to launch it beside the one you quoted? Is it the MRep DB of infra?

Different results from 3.0 to 3i

I am creating worksheets on Oracle Discoverer 3.1 User Edition (Version 3.1.36.06) and trying to view them on Oracle Discoverer 3i Viewer Edition v3.3.57.24.
I get normal results on the user edition. I get various results on the 3i version. I noticed that just adding totals to a worksheet caused different results in 3i. In some cases, the worksheet would display rows in 3i but no totals. It would also run extremely longer in 3i (minutes versus seconds). In other cases, 3i Viewer would return the message that the worksheet was empty. I also received an error message "An error occurred while trying to run the query. (Internal EUL Error: ExprPArseNodeType - Invalid type in canonical formula".
I have developed various reports in a different Business Area that are working as expected in 3i.
Any help would be appreciated.

Please tell us your first name and put it into your OTN profile and handle as a courtesy and help to us. Thanks.
There is a patch for this problem on Metalink for bug 7138068, file p7138068_111060_GENERIC.zip.
Scott

Different result froma same MDX

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for