Difficultly creating Phase One lens profiles

Has anyone successfully created lens profiles with Phase One backs, specifically the P65+?  I'm having two major issues:
1. file format.  I tried converting to DNG via Capture One 6 and Lightroom 3.3--both generated files that LPC could not read.  I see the image previews at the bottom center of LPC, but the higher res version in the center of the application doesn't display.  When I click "Generate Profiles" it says "Detect corners failed because file reading errors occurred"  My current workaround is to convert to TIF instead, which works fine but takes a lot more time & disk space.
2. memory.  When I use TIFs, I get the error "Detect corners failed because out of memory..."  It suggests using fewer photos, so I've whittled it down to 3, which I believe is the minimum, but I still get the error almost immediately--it appears to be failing on just one photo.  I'm running Win 7 x64 and I have 6GB of physical RAM, 154GB free on my OS disk and 92GB free on the disk that contains the imagery.
Any ideas?  Thanks!

In further testing, I've found that the file format issue is momentarily solved by closing and restarting the application.  It tends to come back as soon as I perform a couple other operations, though.
I also found that the memory limitation affects P45+ images as well--it says out of memory even if I only select 3 images--but using the P65+ in Sensor+ mode (switching from 60MP to 15MP) does result in DNGs that lens profile creator can handle (and then I can select a whole lot of them without a memory issue).

Similar Messages

  • How do I create a new lens profile?

    How do I creat a new lens profile for a Canon EF135mm f/2 and EF200 f/2.8 in lightroom 3.3?

    Hi Simon,
    Thanks for your reply.   I figured it out, I  downloaded the new version of Raw 6.3 and now I have the lens profile and others  such as crop constraint and
    chromatic abrerrations.  I was looking for these items in Photoshop Raw
    Thanks,
    Aideen
    If I understand you correctly, you found and downloaded a lens profile that matches your camera and lens, and you don't see the profile in LR?
    1. Make sure that you relaunch LR after you downloaded the lens profiles.
    2. The type of lens profiles (raw or non-raw) matches your image type (raw or non-raw). Namely you can only apply raw lens profiles to raw image files and vice versa for the non-raw profiles.
    -Simon
    >

  • 8.4RC mentions support for Fuji lens profiles - any details known?

    Curious if this is new support or if it's always been there and now ACR shows a message about it. I installed the ACR 8.4RC and loaded a RAW file from my X-T1. Looking at the Lens Corrections tab and the Profile sub-tab, there's now a message at the bottom that says "Built-in lens profile applied: XF14mmF2.2 R. Click for more info." When I clicked, a small dialog box appeared which  offered a little more info:
    Fujifilm X-T1
    XF14mmF2.8R
    This raw file contains a built-in lens profile for correcting chromatic aberration and vignetting. The profile has already been applied automatically to this image.
    I experimented and got this for RAWs shot with my X-E2 as well and also my 18-55 and 55-200 lenses. I then went back to ACR 8.3 and confirmed that the messages are not there.
    I notice that despite what they say, going to the Color sub-tab and checking Remove Chromatic Aberration was still required for some images.
    I didn't see this aspect of the update listed in any release notes. Does anyone know any details about this? Is there a way to turn it off if so desired? I'm curious if the Fuji profile is as good as one that could be created with the Lens Profile Creator. The message doesn't mention geometric correction which would be nice.

    The information about what built-in lens profile is being applied is new to ACR 8.4, but the application of built-in lens profiles is not new. 
    Whether those lens profiles do a perfect job is another matter, of course.  And just like in previous versions, you cannot turn the built-in profiles off, but if someone creates an external profile those can also be applied. 
    The one thing to be careful of is if the built-in lens profile also corrects the same aspect as the external profile, for example, vignetting, then it’ll get double-corrected and the way to avoid this is to set the manual strength setting of that profile correction parameter, either vignetting or distortion, to its minimum value, effectively turning off the external profile’s contribution.

  • Custom lens profile not working

    I decided to create a custome lens profile for my old Canon EF 17-35 2.8 L USM lens. I downloaded the Adobe Lens Profile creator and studied documentation. After figuring out it is time taking process I finally decided to shoot over 500 hundred images with the lens in RAW format with my 5D Mark III.
    First I was a little too optimistic and imported all the photos to ALPC without separating them to distance groups. I shot 9 photo sets with apertures 2.8, 4, 5.6 and 8, focal lengths 17,  20, 24, 28 and 35 from 3 different distances. The ALPC created the profile ok (there were some skipped photos) and I can select that profile both in LR5.2 and PS CC. However nothing changes in the picture when I select that profile. I read the documentation again and decided to start again with just one set of 9 pictures (17mm, 8.0, one shooting position) profile gets created and is selectable in LR and PS, but it affects nothing. Even if the target photo (RAW) is shot with different focal length or aperture, shouldn't the approximation used then and some visual change to be seen?
    What am I doing wrong?

    Please send the profile and an example raw image (taken with this 17-35 lens) to me at [email protected] (dropbox, yousendit.com, etc.).  It will help me determine what is going wrong.

  • Correct Lens Profile Not Available for Exported/Imported Image Files

    Any help with this would be appreciated.  I just noticed yesterday that when I have RAW (DNG) files in my LR5.2 library, I can select the correct lens profile to apply.  When I take three of those files and merge them together in Photomatix Pro they come back as a single TIFF file.  Now LR only has one lens profile available, and it is the wrong one.
    This is happening with my Sony NEX-7 and Tamron 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR DI-III VC.  With the RAW files, I have a list of Tamron lenses from which to choose, and the correct one is available.  For the merged TIFF file, however, only a single Tamron lens is available for selection, and it is not the lens I used.
    If anyone has any ideas about this and can get me past it, I would greatly appreciate it.
    Thanks,
    ~Steve

    Here's my workflow for this particular situation:  After importing the original RAW files, I apply lens correction using the correct profile.  I export to another application that creates a new (TIFF) file that comes back into LR.  Even though I already applied the correction to the original files, I can see that there is a difference in distortion between the original files and the new TIFF.
    If your other application is opening the Raw file directly, it will likely be disregarding either most, or all, Lightroom adjustments even if they are somehow communicated to it. It will come down to whatever independent Raw support is built into the other application.
    The other application would still need to (a) "understand" about Adobe lens profiles etc, (b) "know" where to find the appropriate Adobe profile on disk, and (c) be equipped to do the specific and proprietary processing that they refer to. The same applies for all the other Adobe-proprietary processing instructions. The only software I am aware of which can do all this reliably, in partnership with LR, is Adobe Camera Raw plus Photoshop.
    I've trained myself that whenever a new file is created in an application outside of LR (including PS), I always re-apply lens correction upon first returning to LR.  If I'm interpreting   the above responses correctly, I shouldn't need to re-apply lens correction if I applied it to the original files.  But again, it's not my observation that this is the case.
    If your particular workflow is failing to reflect the first application of lens corrections (as well as perhaps, other specific adjustments) - then what returns to LR will not have undergone those kinds of corrections yet.
    I'm also hearing that I may need to download a lens profile for this lens for a TIFF file format.  I've never needed to do that before, so perhaps I'll give that a shot.
    As I understand it, Photomatix can also accept converted TIFFs or JPGs from LR - instead of Raw fles. I am skeptical that you will realise any "clear water" advantage from sending Raws rather than TIFF (or even, high quality JPG in many cases) from LR into Photomatix  - assuming the LR conversion is already optimising the images for the required purpose. You would be doing that step in an interactive environment rather than blindly via a generic converter. Such intermediate bitmaps are in my experience perfectly good candidates for HDR processing, or for exposure fusion (which I prefer - though I don't use Photomatix in particular).
    Any workflow which causes LR to in effect Export suitable bitmaps that incorporate all current adjustments, will embody lens corrections as part of that. By the way, the workflow into Photoshop HDR is similarly done by way of converted bitmaps - though in that case it is ACR rather than LR which achieves these converted bitmaps, and into memory rather than into separately saved files, but the outcome is effectively the same.
    The only downside is the "cleanup" is to get rid of intermediate TIFFS or JPGs afterwards. I usually put the completed "merged" image at the top of a "stack" containing the component exposures, and collapse the stack down. But the (disposable) intermediates don't get imported to LR, and by setting these to occur in a subfolder or with a distinctive name suffix, they are easily found and deleted in due course.
    RP

  • Missing lens profile (Canon 500 F4 IS)

    The Canon 500mm F4 is one of the most popular (if not the most popular) lens among canon wildlife photographers.  And yet it has never been included in the ACR.  Why is this?  How do I rattle Adobe's cage to get them to add this very popular lens?

    Although that lens might be the most popular lens among wildlife photographers, it might not be one that Adobe has chosen to profile yet. If you go to the Adobe labs website you can download the Lens Profile Downloader which is a program that will link to a website where others have created and posted lens profiles. You might find one there. Or, on that same website, you can download the Lens Profile Creator which is a program that will enable you to create your own profile.
    As a side note (and something you are probably aware of), lens profiles are file format sensitive. In other words, a profile that was created for raw images will not be visible or available for JPEG images.

  • Missing Lens Profile

    I have the latest LR update but notice that a lens profile for my Sigma 170-500mm is not in the list under lens correction. Any tips or suggestions on how or where I could get this from?

    Although that lens might be the most popular lens among wildlife photographers, it might not be one that Adobe has chosen to profile yet. If you go to the Adobe labs website you can download the Lens Profile Downloader which is a program that will link to a website where others have created and posted lens profiles. You might find one there. Or, on that same website, you can download the Lens Profile Creator which is a program that will enable you to create your own profile.
    As a side note (and something you are probably aware of), lens profiles are file format sensitive. In other words, a profile that was created for raw images will not be visible or available for JPEG images.

  • Just one partner profile for SAP XI?!

    Hi,
    well i have some thoughts concerning configuring the partner profile on sender side.
    I have different systems to which e.g. IDocs will be send to. Therefore i was thinking to set one partner profile for each connected system.
    But on the other hand it is also possible to just configure one partner profile, e.g. called SAP XI, and seperate the different IDocs inside this partner profile because of different Message-Types of the Outb-parameters, and inside this because of the IDoc-Type.
    So what is the most propriate way to solve this, is there a suggestion by SAP?!
    thx in advance, Jens

    Hey guys,
    Just thought I'd add my experiences here.
    In one of our implementations we created partner profiles with respect to XI. We had multiple source systems , but the Target ECC team was like, we do not care who sends the data to XI, as far as we are concerned we get data from XI. So we create only one partner profile. We agreed to this and so all Idoc's posting from XI had the XI as the sender partner name. The project went into production and things were fine.
    Then comes the next release. And what do we realise, that the same Idoc will not be posted from XI but for different source systems with different formats. The Inbound processing for the idoc was also being changed stating that Idoc from Source system A  needs to be processed with this T code and Idoc's from System B with this code. reason was different bsuiness rules across different geographies.
    Now, at this juncture we realised in vain that it would have been better had we maintained the partner profiles with respect to the End Systems . having it with respect to XI caused issues in the fact that we are unableto trace out which Idoc belonged to which system.
    Since, then we always recommend all partner profiles with respect to End Systems and not with respect to XI. Helps the business also understand how many idoc's were posted for which source system and so on.
    Just my 2 cents and experience here. Would love to heard more on this topic as well.
    Regards
    Bhavesh

  • Lens Profiles not registering in Lightroom 4

    I have a number of lens profiles that I have created with Adobe Lens Profile Creator and placed in the  designated folder, but when I run Lightroom, they do not appear in the list.
    There is an "index.dat" file under folder 1.0 that I suspect needs to be updated, but I don't know how.
    I also added a Minolta folder since there was noe befor to place my Minolta lens profiles. This does not show either when I run Lightroom.

    Rikk is correct. User created lens profiles should be put under the user specific lens profiles folders.
    On Mac, put them under (note there is no space in the "CameraRaw" sub-folder) or any of its sub directories:
    Hard Drive>Users>your user name>Library>Application Support>Adobe>CameraRaw>Lens Profiles>1.0
    On Windows,
    C:\Users\your user name\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0
    I thought ALPC will default to save to these user speficic locations.

  • Adobe Lens Profile Creator - ERROR (Detect corners failed because file reading errors ocurred)

    1) I have successfully created a lens profile for a Nikon AF Micro Nikkor 40mm 2.8 lens used in a Nikon D5200 Camera. For this I converted the raw .nef files to .DNG first using Adobe's DNG Converter.
    2) When trying to create another lens profile using the EXACT SAME .DNG files as posted in 1), I am no longer able to create a lens profile because of the message "Detect corners failed because file reading errors ocurred". I am also unable to create any other lens profile using different photos.
    3) I have also tried using a fresh install of Adobe Lens Profile Creator in another mac and I get the exact same error.
    4) I AM ABLE to create a lens profile if I use .jpg files (generated from the same raw .nef files as mentioned) but this doesn't help because then the profiles don't show up when trying to open a raw file in Adobe Camera Raw.
    Please help as this is exasperating.
    Thank you.

    Thanks! I had the same error message in Adobe Lens Profile Creator 1.0.4 for OSX and I found the problem to be the letter ö in the folder name for the DNGs. The lens is an old ISCO-Göttingen and the progress stopped at 2% with the mentioned error message. Changed the folder name and now it works!

  • Why the lens profile list can't show ALL lens profiles items from "LensProfiles 1.0" folder?

    When I add a new lens profile - Samyang 14mm f2.8 - .lcp file into the "LensProfiles > 1.0" folder, I appear there are many lens profile items can't show in the Lightroom lens profiles list.
    Please tell me how can I add these items into the LR lens profiles list........... thanks!!!

    Sorry my bad, should have put.
    Your custom Camera Raw & Lens Profiles should be installed to the User folders…
    Lightroom 5 no longer uses the shared ProgramData (Windows) / Application Support (Mac) folders for Camera or Lens Profiles. Instead, it stores the built-in profiles with its program files.
    When you create camera or lens profiles, they must be stored in the user locations listed below. If you previously stored custom profiles in other locations, you’ll need to move them to these user folders, otherwise Lightroom won’t be able to find them.
    Windows—C: \ Users \ [your username] \ AppData \ Roaming \ Adobe \ CameraRaw \ CameraProfiles \
    Mac—Macintosh HD / Users / [your username] / Library / Application Support / Adobe / CameraRaw / CameraProfiles /
    For the lens profiles, substitute the LensProfiles folder for the CameraProfiles folder.
    The camera and lens profile file extensions are:
    .dcpr—camera profile recipe file used for creating/editing a profile in the DNG Profile Editor
    .dcp—camera profile
    .lcp—lens profile

  • Working with RAW images without lens profile?

    Does it make sense to work on RAW images if no lens profile exist for the used specific lens?
    I see clear differences between RAW and JPG image in means of distortion.
    How did you work with RAW images?

    There are many advantages to using RAW, so yes it makes sense to work on RAW images even if no profile exists for the lens.
    I see clear differences between RAW and JPG image in means of distortion.
    How did you work with RAW images?
    You can create your own lens profiles. Or you can manually adjust each image. Or you can set up presets for different focal lengths. There's a lot of ways to go.

  • Lumix G1 Lens Profile

    does anyone have a lens profile for lumix G1 with 14-45 and 45-200 lens, created from adobe lens profile creator?
    Thanks

    Hi tgutgu
    I wondered too why there are no lens profiles available for Lumix G lenses.
    But what i do not understand is, why are there lens profiles for Nikon, Canon etc.? Why do they not embedd the correction parameters to their lenses like Panasonic does it? (and so you have to use and activate the preinstalled profiles?)
    And why Lumix G users can not deactivate the lens correction to compare the resulting difference?
    Kind regards,
    Roman.

  • Produced lens profile for Canon G12 put in folder 1.0 does not show in lightroom edit pane

    Noted that adobe show lens profiles for G10, G12 G15 and G1X but only G10 shows in downloader and in lightroom edit pane profile selection
    Created my own lens profile for G12 svaed it but does not come up in edit pane choices??

    What LR version are you using, and does LR let you manually select the profile you want?
    I take your point that Canon could have offered their own Adobe-compatible profiles, but those would probably have needed to then be supplied to the end user by Canon, not by Adobe.
    I am seeing the particular Canon profiles that you mention, in LR 5.4, offered against Raw images but not against non-Raw images.
    Unless you are using an older software version, or selecting perhaps a derived edit version in e.g. TIFF instead of a Raw, I am at a loss why you are not seeing them too.
    I believe these will have been generated by Adobe. They are here on my PC:
    Please note that there is a non-Raw profile listed there for e.g. the G10 but not for e.g. the G12. So the fact that you ARE seeing a profile for the G10, lends some weight to the idea that the image currently selected may not in fact be Raw based.
    BTW, I don't think that any extra profiles that the user might make or find, and then save in here, are going to ever be seen by LR (or ACR). This is apparently the Adobe "official installed profiles only" location.
    Any profiles made or found by the user, need to be saved into a similar folder within the user's data area, in order for LR to see them and use them. And if these are Raw based, they will still not appear for a non-Raw based image.
    On my Windows computer, that location is C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0
    This has a "Downloaded" subfolder (which is, I think, the destination used by the Adobe profile downloader utility).
    RP

  • Can't search for lens profiles

    Hi everyone.  Maybe this is the wrong place for this postsince it's not directly related to the LPC but I thought I'd ask anyways.  I have CS5 32bit on both my desktop and laptop computers (both run Win 7 64 bit).  On my laptop, in the Lens Correction filter, I can click on the Search Online button and it finds a few more profiles.  On my Desktop, the search button is disabled.  I can't seem to figure out why.  Any help you can provide would be great.  I plan to start creating my own lens profiles but want to be able to leaverage the work that others are doing by searching online.
    Thanks,
    Steve

    Check out http://forums.adobe.com/thread/629199?tstart=0 . BTW, your input image's camera/lens EXIF metadata is shown in the bottom/left corner of the PS LC dialog. If you see "--", it means the EXIF data is missing.

Maybe you are looking for