Diffrence between OBIEE 10g and 11g Architecture

Hi
Please help me by providing either the differences between the OBIEE 10g and 11g Architecture or a pointer/link.
Thanks

Hi,
There are some!!
Check here;
http://www.rittmanmead.com/obiee11g/
http://www.biconsultinggroup.com/images/VideoAlbum/WhitePapersFAQ10-31-10.pdf
http://blogs.oracle.com/robreynolds/2010/12/security_in_obiee_11g_part_1.html
http://blogs.oracle.com/robreynolds/2010/12/security_in_obiee_11g_part_2.html
This will give an indication of all the changes.
Cheers,
Daan Bakboord
http://obibb.wordpress.com

Similar Messages

Difference Between OBIEE 10g and OBIEE 11g

Hi everyone,
I have a doubt when choosing two versions of OBIEE, 10g and 11g.
Actually, is there any big difference between 10g and 11 version ?
From the point of view of easiness finding tutorial in internet, simplicity of using the tool, and other considerations, which one is better ?
I hope you guys could also explain with your arguments.
Thanks

Hi,
Few differences..
Architectures-
OBIEE 11g architecture...http://www.rittmanmead.com/2010/07/09/obiee-11gr1-architecture-and-use-of-weblogic-server/
OBIEE 10g architecture....http://gerardnico.com/wiki/dat/obiee/obiee_overview
Features-
New features in OBIEE11g...Re: OBIEE 11g
http://blogs.oracle.com/robreynolds/2010/07/new_administration_features_of.html
I have a doubt when choosing two versions of OBIEE, 10g and 11g.If you are new to OBIEE its best to start with 10g,there are lot changes in 11g.It takes time to get used to it and you many not get enough docs or material to read,may face some new issues also.
Actually, is there any big difference between 10g and 11 version ? Yes there are some differences between them...you can see them in above links.(many things like graphs,server)
From the point of view of easiness finding tutorial in internet, simplicity of using the tool, and other considerations, which one is better ?For sure obiee 10g as 11g is new many of them just started using it,so you may get less help on this if you face issues & may not get enough tutorial in internet and OBIEE10g is bit easy to use.
Its best to you go for OBIEE10g,parallely you can try 11g.
Regards,
Srikanth
Edited by: Srikanth Mandadi on Oct 7, 2010 11:08 AM

Important differences between oracle 10g and 11g

Hi friends, can anyone tell me (pointwise) what are the major (and minor) differences between Oracle 10g and 11g.
Please point me to some documents if possible.
Thanks in advance

The name of the link says it all: "top_features."
In short it is Oracle's list of what they have for marketing and sales reasons designated "top features."
It is not intended to be, and is not, a complete list of features. Often the features Oracle does not
talk about are the most important.
Let me give you some examples. I have never seen Oracle announce DBMS_XPLAN as a new feature
yet you should not run an explain plan without it. Neither have I ever seen Oracle announce the new
NO_DATA_NEEDED predefined exception. I have listed literally hundreds of new features you will not
find in Oracle's new features docs.
I did a presentation at OpenWorld this year as part of the unconference titled "New Features in
Database 11gR2 that Oracle will not announce." It was easy to prepare a one hour presentation with
little fear of being proved incorrect. As I turned out only one of the features I presented was mentioned
by Oracle.
You can find the presentation slides here:
http://www.morganslibrary.org/pres/oow09_ucnf.pdf

Diff between oracle 10g and 11g

Can any one could tell me what is the main diff between oracle 10g and 11g ?
Thanks in Advance
Venkat

Hi,
You can read
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/sql/index-082320.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/sql/index-099021.html
Anand

Diff between odi 10g and 11g

Hi,
Can some one reply the important and main differences between ODI 10 and 11g.Urgent!!!
Thanks,
Pop...

quickly :
* new user interface : ODI studio with new functionnalites (open object on tabs, save button, cancel button...)
* new object : load plan
* new agent architecture : JEE agent
* integration with weblogic ; ODI console instead of Metadata Navigator
* support of union/intersect/... in interfaces
* news KM and index improvment
* support of "derivated table" in yellow interface (ie : use sub request instead of creating the yellow table)
* lookup functionnality for interface
* simulation of code without executing the interface
* support of tables partitions
* global scope KM
* best tool for export/import

Can I install OBIEE 10g and 11g on the same machine?

While I'm waiting for new hardware, I wanted to get started on installing OBIEE 11g on my laptop. Can I do this if I already have 10g installed?
I want to make sure if I install it that it will not impact my current 10g setup. I'm not sure if it overrides certain files and folders or if I can do a separate installation to have both.

Hello everyone.
I have OBIEE 10g on my Production box pointing to the Oracle Database 11g R1 which is also having OWB integrated in it.
Now, I am planning to upgrade OBIEE 10g to 11g and Oracle Database from 11g R1 to 11g R2, so that OWB will also be upgarded, as it is integrated in 11gR2.
I am confused about, how to run RCU on the database, as OBIEE 10g schemas and packages will already be there in the database.
If I run RCU again, what will it do???
Has anyone done this before? or any good document available ?
Many Thanks,
Ahsan.

Issue with materialized view and fast refresh between Oracle 10g and 11g

Hi all,
I've hit a problem when trying to create a fast-refreshable materialized view.
I've got two databases, one 10.2.0.10, another 11.2.0.1.0, running on 32-bit Windows. Both are enterprise edition, and I'm trying to pull data from the 10g one into the 11g one. I can happily query across the database link from 11g to 10g, and can use complete refresh with no problem except the time it takes.
On the 10g side, I've got tables with primary keys and m.v. logs created, the logs being of this form ...
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON table WITH PRIMARY KEY INCLUDING NEW VALUES
On the 11g side, when I try to create an m.v. against that ...
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW mv_table REFRESH FAST WITH PRIMARY KEY AS SELECT col1, col2 FROM table@dblink;
... I get an ORA-12028 error (materialized view type is not supported by master site).
After running the EXPLAIN_MVIEW procedure it shows this;
REFRESH_FAST_AFTER_INSERT not supported for this type mv by Oracle version at master site
A colleague has managed to build a fast-refresh m.v. from the same source database, but pulling to a different one than I'm using; his target is also 10g, like the (common) source, so I've no idea why I'm getting the 'not supported' message whilst he isn't.
I've been able, on previous projects, to do exactly what I'm trying to achieve but on those someone with more knowledge than me has configured the database!
I'm now stumped. I'm also no DBA but despite that it's been left to me to install the new 11g database on the 32-bit Windows server from scratch, so there are probably a couple of things I'm missing. It's probably something really obvious but I don't really know where to look now.
If anyone can give me any pointers at all, I'd be really grateful. This question is also duplicated in the Replication forum but hasn't had any replies as yet, so I'm reproducing it here in hope!
Thanks in advance,
Steve

Hi Steve,
You should have a look at metalink, Doc ID 1059547.1
If that does not help, there may be something else in Mater note ID 1353040.1
Best regards
Peter

Validate_layer_with_context -- differences between version 10g and 11g

I have a spatial table that validates without issues under v10.2.0.4.0. This table was replicated to a new database running v11.2.0.2.0. Under this environment, the validation reports an "ORA-13366: invalid combination of interior exterior rings" issue. Has anyone else experienced this situation and does anyone have an explanation?
Thanks,
David

Hi David,
Not sure if I actually solved your issue. Any incorrect ring rotation has always thrown ORA-13367 as long as I have been around, 10g or 11g. In 10g you should never have seen true if any of your rings were originally backwards. And indeed its a big polygon but for example I have been doing some testing with "uber" polygons and just the other night was running SIMPLIFY on a polygon with 1.2 million vertices and it took a while (I went to bed) but in the morning it was done.
How are you testing ring rotation? I put a quickie function below. Are you doing things similarly? TO_CURRENT will actually reallocate rings from inner to outer if one is inside the other. But as part of the rearranging will always correct the ring orientation. In your case that seems not to have happened which is very odd. But perhaps this has something to do with the sheer number of polygons in the collection and how they interact (raw speculation). I would first try removing that particular polygon with SDO_UTIL.EXTRACT and see if there is anything squirrelly about it by itself.
Cheers,
Paul
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION inspect_ordinate_rotation(
   p_input       IN MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY,
   p_lower_bound IN NUMBER DEFAULT 1,
   p_upper_bound IN NUMBER DEFAULT NULL
) RETURN VARCHAR2
AS
   int_dims      PLS_INTEGER := p_input.get_dims();
   int_lb        PLS_INTEGER := p_lower_bound;
   int_ub        PLS_INTEGER := p_upper_bound;
   p_area        NUMBER;
   num_x         NUMBER;
   num_y         NUMBER;
   num_lastx     NUMBER;
   num_lasty     NUMBER;
BEGIN
   IF int_dims IS NULL
   THEN
     int_dims := 2;
   END IF;
   IF int_ub IS NULL
   THEN
      int_ub := p_input.SDO_ORDINATES.COUNT;
   END IF;
   IF int_lb IS NULL
   THEN
      int_lb := 1;
   END IF;
   p_area := 0;
   num_lastx := 0;
   num_lasty := 0;
   WHILE int_lb <= int_ub
   LOOP
      num_x := p_input.SDO_ORDINATES(int_lb);
      num_y := p_input.SDO_ORDINATES(int_lb + 1);
      p_area := p_area + ( (num_lasty * num_x ) - ( num_lastx * num_y) );
      num_lastx := num_x;
      num_lasty := num_y;
      int_lb := int_lb + int_dims;
   END LOOP;
   IF p_area > 0
   THEN
      RETURN 'CW';
   ELSE
      RETURN 'CCW';
   END IF;
END inspect_ordinate_rotation;

Difference between OBIA 10g and 11g

hi all
Can anyone tell me the new modules which are added in OBIA 11g as compared to 10g.
Any help deeply appreciated.
Thanks
Bivin

Check all 4 links from New Features for Oracle Business Intelligence Users - 11g Release 1 (11.1.1)
If helps mark
~ http://cool-bi.com

Can we install OBIEE 10G and 11G on Same Machine

Hi Experts,
I want to install OBIEE 11 G on the same machine(Windows) which already have OBIEE 10.1.3.4. So is it possible.
I dont want to upgrade at this stage.
Thanks

No problem if you give a different port number.
regards
John
http://obiee101.blogspot.com

Physical Joins Difference Between 10G and 11G?

Hi All, I have started using OBIEE 11G. Anybody please let me know is there any difference in applying physical joins in OBIEE 10G and 11G.
I heard that we need to join Fact and Dim tables in reverse way in 11G.
Thanks in Advance.

# Fast-Start Failover for Maximum Performance Mode in a Data Guard Configuration
# Compression of Redo Traffic (Only for Gap Resolution) Over the Network in a Data Guard Configuration
# Real-Time Query Capability of Physical Standby Database
# Fast Role Transitions in a Data Guard Configuration
# Data Guard Integration, Simplification, and Performance
# Dynamic Setting of Oracle Data Guard SQL Apply Parameters
# Enhanced Data Guard Broker Based Management Framework
# Histogram for Redo Transport Response Time in a Data Guard Configuration
# Snapshot Standby
# Strong Authentication for Data Guard Redo Transport
# Enhanced DDL Handling in Oracle Data Guard SQL Apply
# Enhanced Oracle RAC Switchover Support for Logical Standby Databases
# Data Guard Logical Apply Completeness
# Oracle Scheduler Support in Data Guard SQL Apply
# Support Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) with Data Guard SQL Apply
# Support XMLType Data Type (Only CLOB) in Data Guard SQL Apply
# Virtual Private Database (VPD) Support in Data Guard SQL Apply
See Also:
Oracle Data Guard Concepts and Administration for details
Ref. Oracle® Database New Features Guide
11g Release 1 (11.1)
Part Number B28279-01
~ Madrid

EPMMaster.rpd Fusion Pack migration from OBIEE 10g to 11g

We have successfully installed OBIEE 10g and 11g on Windows 2008 32bit servers. On the 10g Installation, we have applied the Fusion Pack EPMMaster RPD file and it connects successfully to our EPM warehouse. We want to migrate the Fusion pack to 11g which is also setup on the same platform. Per the instructions in the documentation, we have copied the files (RPD file and Webcat folder) to the 11g server. We run the UA.bat file and it proceeds to start copying the files over fom the RPD and WebCatalog to the new system. It completes this process, but then hangs on starting the Oracle BI server - it never gets beyond that.
We will be purchasing the EPMMaster RPD and know it is not available yet for 11g – however we’re trying to get ahead of the curve a bit and manually fix the items in the presentation layer that will not render correctly in 11g
upgrade exception occurred
Unable to start process: instance1: coreapplication_obis1
One thing that I noticed – Since the UA tool does not completely finish --
RPD size on 10g – 42,675KB; 11g – 6,375KB
I manually change the webcat in Enterprise Manager to the EPMMaster catalog -this actually caused additional errors on restart.
Has anyone attempted upgrading a delivered RPD to 11g?
Thanks in advance -

This is a known issue that we have worked through with Oracle tech support. The Dimension Deduction.Deduction Sid causes an error that prevents the UA tool from completing the upgrade process. There are a couple of ways around this, but the fastest is to simply delete the Dimension, the two related hierarchies and the fact table that is joined to this dimension. Physical table do not need to be touched however. There are still issues once it’s moved to 11g, but those can be addressed post migration. Thanks much to the Oracle support team for helping us out with this issue!

Differences btwn 10g and 11g

What are the main differences between ODI 10g and 11g.
Edited by: 957852 on Feb 1, 2013 11:32 PM

Please use the search feature:
http://www.google.com/search?q=ODI+11g+enhancements&oq=ODI+11g+enhancements
and look at the first result

Difference between 10g and 11g OEM

Hi,
I would like to know what is the difference between 10g and 11g Grid control. Unfortunately I have worked only on 11g Grid Control. So do not not what exactly are the differences like from GUI features,installation steps.
Thank you....

Hi,
From 11g grid Weblogic also introduced. You can refer this below note for understanding even architecture.
*Understanding the Enterprise Manager 10g and 11g Grid Control Management Agent, Directory Structure and Key Configuration Files. [ID 234872.1]*

Data mismatch between 10g and 11g.

Hi
We recently upgraded OBIEE to 11.1.1.6.0 from 10.1.3.4.0. While testing we found data mismatch between 10g and 11g in-case of few reports which are including a front end calculated column with division included in it, say for example ("- Paycheck"."Earnings" / COUNT(DISTINCT "- Pay"."Check Date")) / 25.
The data is matching for the below scenarios.
1) When the column is removed from both 10g and 11g.
2) When the aggregation rule is set to either "Sum or Count" in both 10g and 11g.
It would be very helpful and greatly appreciated if any workaround/pointers to solve this issue is provided.
Thanks

jfedynic wrote:
The 10g and 11.1.0.7 Databases are currently set to AL32UTF8.
In each database there is a VARCHAR2 field used to store data, but not specifically AL32UTF8 data but encrypted data.
Using the 10g Client to connect to either the 10g database or 11g database it works fine.
Using the 11.1.0.7 Client to go against either the 10g or 11g database and it produces the error: ORA-29275: partial multibyte character
What has changed?
Was it considered a Bug in 10g because it allowed this behavior and now 11g is operating correctly?
29275, 00000, "partial multibyte character"
// *Cause: The requested read operation could not complete because a partial
//          multibyte character was found at the end of the input.
// *Action: Ensure that the complete multibyte character is sent from the
//          remote server and retry the operation. Or read the partial
//          multibyte character as RAW.It appears to me a bug got fixed.

Diffrence between OBIEE 10g and 11g Architecture

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for