Dimension size in LR4 with custom ratio

Good day,
I am still stuck with dimension size in LR4. If I would like to crop a picture to a certain dimension.
I need to have my pictures cropped to 4600 x 3000 - so what I am doing is I enter the dimension in custom ratio, then in export I choose image file and enter 4600 x 3000 in dimension size. and then - my picture turns out with 4600 x 2990?
what am I doing wrong?
I have managed to get the right size before but for the love of god I can just not remember what I did different then...
any help will be very much appreciated.
thanks
Sandy

richardplondon wrote:
My LR 4.4 image was 3872 x 2592 uncropped, and 3872 x 2526 after applying the 4.6 : 3 aspect ratio.
My LR 4.4.1 image was 3872 x 2592 uncropped, and 3872 x 2525 after applying the 4.6 : 3 aspect ratio. This makes no sense unless you're using LR4.4.0 and something changed in LR 4.4.1.
richardplondon wrote:
I'm still not sure about the rounding issues Richard mentions, what if anything has changed, and in what version. We also haven't been able to duplicate the OP's results (4600 x 2990). Perhaps the OP could post an image file to a download site that produces the 3872 x 2592 output and we can test it.
The truncating of an aspect ratio to 2 places, would fit with this number - and I can't think of any other mechanism that does so.
With the same image above in 5.2RC, if you enter 1 and 0.65 into the custom boxes, then LR displays the resulting aspect ration as "1.538 x 1" and the resulting crop is 3204 x 4928 instead of 3214 x 4928. The resulting export when requesting 3000x4600, is 2991x4600 (we clearly still have some imprecision about that final pixel, and probably always will).
The displayed crop value is to 3 decimal places with entry values ranging from 10000 to 0.001 allowed. Precision should be at least to the displayed values or why bother displaying them, correct?
If I use the same example with LR4.4.1 with a crop value of 1 x 0.65 I get 1.538 x 1 same as yours. Now let's try a few other examples with LR4.4.1:
1538.90 x 1000 = 15.389 x 10
1538.49 x 1000 = 15.385 x 10
1538.44 x 1000 = 15.385 x 10 (INCORRECT)
Next I entered five (5) new custom ratios, which is the only way to clear out the custom 15.385 x10 crop ratio. Next I tried entering the same custom crop value again:
1538.44 x 1000 = 15.384 x 10 (Now CORRECT)
So clearly the calculated precision is to three decimal places. The problem is that the replacement algorithm is only using two decimal places. If the new ratio has the same value as an exisitng custom ratio to two decimal places. then it uses that value and does not create a new custom ratio with the correct value.
...and that answers this question:
richardplondon wrote:
I don't know whether it is possible to clear previously entered custom aspect ratios, other than by sledgehammer methods, but the way that prior entries do reappear, indicates to me some kind of background behavior going on. This may be confusng the troubleshooting of the issue, since different people will have different histories of earlier custom ratios, present in their computers.
No matter how you slice-it or dice-it this is a bug in the algorithm used for calculating the custom crop!
It looks like there is a similar problem in LR5 with the Export module Image Sizing algorithm:
http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lightroom_5_export_isnt_resizing_exa ctly_to_specified_long_edge

Similar Messages

Page size printing problems with custom page size I created

I have created a custom page size (very small) for printing an advertise I had to print, and now after that operation all the pages I ask to print to any printer are automatically printed in that setup, and sometimes even if I change to A4 manually, the page changes but the borders of the page still remain the old one (result i can not print). How can I cancel the custom page size I created, so that my printers restart to print automatically in A4?
thank you very much

I have created a custom page size (very small) for printing an advertise I had to print, and now after that operation all the pages I ask to print to any printer are automatically printed in that setup, and sometimes even if I change to A4 manually, the page changes but the borders of the page still remain the old one (result i can not print). How can I cancel the custom page size I created, so that my printers restart to print automatically in A4?
thank you very much

Help with custom cropping and known aspect Ratio's

I would like to crop a small part of a larger image with custom / free flow dimensions to the crop and then be able to print / export at a know print friendly aspect ration. An example would be a taking a crop of one person in a couple,from a larger image. The crop is outside common aspect ratios. Can lightroom fit the image to an aspect ratio of my liking whilst maintaining everything I have cropped?
Thank you in advance

Clearly we can't get one aspect ratio into a different aspect ratio without either trimming bits off, or else leaving gaps.
So the best I can suggest is: crop in Develop according to the subject content that you don't want to see.
Then in Print, set up your print layout (or choose a print template) which contains an image cell of the desired size and shape.
There are two ways that a photo can be put into such a cell: it can be fitted "loose" so that you always see the whole current crop, leaving white margins as required; or else it can be fitted "tight" using the Zoom to Fill checkbox. In the latter case, LR applies an additional print-only crop which forces the image that is seen, to adopt the shape of the cell. So the aspect ratio of the Develop crop, does not need to have been exact for this precise output.
This print-only crop will only remove further bits of the photo, not put any back - unlike the Develop crop. But you can slide the image around for the best composition, in terms of what it trims off.
Your main (Develop) crop has not been altered in any way by doing this, and can of course still be adjusted further also, which will in turn alter how the zoom-to-fill appears.
[ edit add: The Develop crop might be made specific for a particular print shape, but does not have to be, with the above technique. Maybe one actively wants to retain the camera-original aspect, with other kinds of output in mind. In any case, page margins often mean that the actual printed area is not quite exactly the same shape as the notional page anyway - a "10x8" printed with a half-inch margin on three sides and a three-quarter inch margin on the bottom, would print 9" x 6 3/4" (which is a different shape than 10x8). And all that would need to have been worked out each time, re-cropping the main composition for each different output size, margin width, etc then re-cropping it back again to 3:2 (or whatever) for your web upload. That can be managed through presets, virtual copies, snapshots - but sounds like a lot of extra work to me. My own images are cropped for general purposes, but each one remembers its last print settings also - which places it onto a page in the needed manner.]

Problem with custom paper size on dot matrix printer

Hi All,
I'm using CR2008 with updated to SP2. I have a problem with custom paper size (W=21; H=14), the CR Viewer show report with custom paper size correctly but when I print it to a dot matrix printer (Epson LQ 300+) the content was rotated to landscape. If print to a laser printer the content was printed correctly. My report was printed correctly by CR10 or previous versions I got this issue when upgraded to CR2008. I aslo tested my computer and printer with orther application like MS Word the printing have no problem with custom paper size.
Thanks for any advice for me.
Han

Looking at the Epson LQ 300+ driver, I see that the latest update is from 2002. In my experience, most matrix printer drivers are not unicode. Crystal Reports is designed to only work with unicode printer drivers. See the [How Printer Driver Options Affect a Report|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/boc/index?rid=/library/uuid/a09051e9-721e-2b10-11b6-f9c65c64ef29&overridelayout=true] article, page 6 for details. Also, see [this|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/oss_notes_boj/sdn_oss_boj_dev/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/scn_bosap/notes.do] note.
Finally, see if you can print from the CR designer to this printer and if you get the correct results here.
Ludek

Help with custom page size support for non standard paper

Firstly, we appreciate any support you may be able to provide, we have already thrown considerable effort at this and it has been very time consuming and frustrating.
To support a number of business functions need to print to (non standard) continuous and mulitpart paper on a dot matrix printer. The (test) Mac is a 10.4.11 G4 laptop, the printer is an Oki Microline 520 (9 pin 80 column, IBM Proprinter, Microline or Epson FX personalities with a parallel interface) which has been networked via a HP JetDirext Ex Plus print server. That part appears to be operating correctly.
We have tried a number of drivers / printer personalities with varying levels of success:
ESP / EPSON 9-Pin Series CUPS v1.1 / Epson FX personality
ESP / OKIDATA 9-Pin Series CUPS v1.1 / Oki Microline personality
Ghostscript / epsonc / Epson Dot Matrix Foomatic PPD / Epson FX personality
Ghostscript / ibmpro / IBM ProPrinterII Foomatic PPD / IBM Proprinter personality
Ghostscript / okiibm / Oki Microline IBM compatible 9 pin Foomatic PPD / IBM Proprinter personality
There were no appropriate drivers in Gutenprint (5.2.3 version) The most successful is the okiibm / Oki Microline IBM compatible 9 pin settings, it can print A4 and honors the Printer Features Resolution settings in the print dialogue.
Q1: Should we see anything in the Printer Info / Installable Option, it is always blank ?
The issue is custom page sizes, we can manage / add Custom Pages Sizes via the Page Setup / Paper Size interface and they draw on the screen OK but they do not work at the printer (various issue at the printer such error messages, junk printing and wrong orientation):
Q2: Are we heading in the right direction or is there a better way to handle this ?
Q3: Would 10.5 solve all our problems, are the print drivers any better ?
Q4: Is this the correct way to specify custom page sizes, is this all we need to do ?
Q5: Is so how do we get the driver to respect the size, do we need another filter or something ?
Q6: Is it possible to add (by hand) custom page sizes to the ESP drivers or Foomatic PPD files so they they appear as a "standard" offering in the Page Setup / Paper Size interface ?
Sorry for the long / complicated post and thanks in advance for any advice / assistance.

Matt Broughton wrote:
Testing on 10.5.7, Tried both Oki 9-Pin Series 1.3 / Microline personality (no joy) and Epson 9-Pin Series 1.3 (this is a much better driver than 1.1) / Epson FX personality but not much joy with custom page sizes,
The Oki 9-pin Series 1.3 and the Epson 9-Pin Series 1.3 should produce the same results. The only difference in the PPDs is the printer model name.
After some testing, I find that the output is not the same despite the two PPDs being virtually identical. I did spot in the CUPS source code for the rastertoepson filter that there is some model name matching for Epson printers. Thus I can see where the output using the Oki 9-pin PPD could be different than when using the Epson 9-pin PPD.
but again once I imbedded the page size into the ppd some (but frustrating) luck. I can get it to respect the paper orientation and it prints well but I could not get the form length to work properly. At best over a print run of 7 labels it would creep up the label by about 0.1 inches / 2 mm.
Just for the fun of it, I made some additions to the Epson 9-pin 1.3 PPD. All I can say is that I could print a job to file. I have no way to know what it would look like on paper.
I did find that using a custom paper size did add some unwanted margins to the output bounding box. Putting the custom page size into the PPD seemed to get around that issue.
I added the following lines to the Epson 9-pin PPD 1.3--
<pre style="overflow: auto;font-size:small; font-family: Monaco, 'Courier New', Courier, monospace; color: #222; background: #ddd; padding: .3em .8em .3em .8em; font-size: 9px;">*PageSize Label1/Label1: "<</PageSize[288 107.8]/ImagingBBox null>>setpagedevice"
*PageRegion Label1/Label1: "<<PageSize[288 107.8]/ImagingBBox null>>setpagedevice"
*ImageableArea Label1/Label1: "0 0 288.00 107.80"
*PaperDimension Label1/Label1: "288.00 107.80"</pre>
This adds a paper size with the 4 inch (288pt) width and 1.5 inch (107.8pt) height. That represents the 1.4 inch label and the 0.1 inch gap between labels. I set 0pt margins except for the bottom where is set the 0.1 inch (7pt) gap as the bottom margin.
The full diff in context is--
<pre style="overflow: auto;font-size:small; font-family: Monaco, 'Courier New', Courier, monospace; color: #222; background: #ddd; padding: .3em .8em .3em .8em; font-size: 9px;">loki:~ matt$ diff -u /usr/share/cups/model/epson9.ppd ~/Desktop/epson9.ppd
--- /usr/share/cups/model/epson9.ppd 2009-02-20 20:16:53.000000000 -0600
+++ /Users/matt/Desktop/epson9.ppd 2009-06-06 20:37:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
*PageSize Legal/US Legal: "<</PageSize[612 1008]/ImagingBBox null>>setpagedevice"
*PageSize A4/A4: "<</PageSize[595 842]/ImagingBBox null>>setpagedevice"
*PageSize FanFoldUS/US Fanfold: "<</PageSize[1071 792]/ImagingBBox null>>setpagedevice"
+*PageSize Label1/Label1: "<</PageSize[288 107.8]/ImagingBBox null>>setpagedevice"
*CloseUI: *PageSize
*OpenUI *PageRegion/Media Size: PickOne
*OrderDependency: 10 AnySetup *PageRegion
@@ -50,17 +51,20 @@
*PageRegion Legal/US Legal: "<</PageSize[612 1008]/ImagingBBox null>>setpagedevice"
*PageRegion A4/A4: "<</PageSize[595 842]/ImagingBBox null>>setpagedevice"
*PageRegion FanFoldUS/US Fanfold: "<</PageSize[1071 792]/ImagingBBox null>>setpagedevice"
+*PageRegion Label1/Label1: "<<PageSize[288 107.8]/ImagingBBox null>>setpagedevice"
*CloseUI: *PageRegion
*DefaultImageableArea: Letter
*ImageableArea Letter/US Letter: "18.00 18.00 594.00 774.00"
*ImageableArea Legal/US Legal: "18.00 18.00 594.00 990.00"
*ImageableArea A4/A4: "18.00 18.00 577.00 824.00"
*ImageableArea FanFoldUS/US Fanfold: "18.00 18.00 1053.00 774.00"
+*ImageableArea Label1/Label1: "0 0 288.00 107.80"
*DefaultPaperDimension: Letter
*PaperDimension Letter/US Letter: "612.00 792.00"
*PaperDimension Legal/US Legal: "612.00 1008.00"
*PaperDimension A4/A4: "595.00 842.00"
*PaperDimension FanFoldUS/US Fanfold: "1071.00 792.00"
+*PaperDimension Label1/Label1: "288.00 107.80"
*MaxMediaWidth: "1080.00"
*MaxMediaHeight: "86400.00"
*HWMargins: 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00</pre>
I don't know if that will help you or not. Let us know what sort of progress you make.
Matt

Problems with Custom Paper Size and Address Book

I'm having some trouble printing from Address Book onto a custom paper size. I'm attempting to set up a notecard, and only print one at a time, rather than multiple columns as in the Labels option. The trouble is that when creating this small size, Address Book doesn't recognize it as anything other than a regular sheet of US Letter, and thus prints the address in the middle of the page.
I have no problem printing envelopes, though, which seems odd because they too go in the manual feed for my printer. The notecards are similar width to the envelopes, but only about half the length.
Has anyone else experienced problems with custom paper sizes printing improperly? I'm using an HP 4515 LaserJet, but have access to a few other laser printers. Thanks for any insight

I have had the same problem, and with the same result; Adobe Tech Support can't help or fix, after 15 hours on phone, Level 2 support. It is a software bug Adobe has, and can't seem to fix. I just upgraded to Lightroom CC, and my problem migrated with the upgrade. I print in Photoshop fine.
If you found an answer, I would appreciate knowing how to do it!
Thanks

Word 2011 for Mac Issue with Custom Page Size

I have installed Microsoft Office 2011 for Mac on my brand new iMac. I'm using Microsoft Word 2011 for Mac and I have opened the "Word Publishing Layout" template (this is essentially Microsoft Publisher). I'm trying to set up custom page sizes by performing the following steps. I go to File --> Page Setup and use the following settings:
1. Settings: Page Attributes
2. Format For: Any Printer
3. Paper Size: I choose "Manage Custom Sizes"
4. I create a 24x36 page and save it
When I do this, Word 2011 (and Word 2008) for Mac will only go to a maximum of 22 inches wide and 22 inches in height. Is there any way around this? I need the big sizes to do digital proofs for my business. I don't want to scale down to 12x18 (essentially cutting the proof by 50%) because when I import it into my other program that can accommodate any size document, I have to do a lot of manual work to get things back to scale. Thanks in advance for your help. If we can figure this out, I'll be grateful.
AC

Please re-post on the Office for Mac Product Forums

How do I set up new Document Profile with custom page sizes?

I see that different profiles have different sets of page sizes. I need a set of page sizes which I use often, and I would like to create a set of these sizes in a new profile, or at least somehow add them to the very minimal set of page sizes which can be selected when setting up a new document. Can this be done?

Thanks Jerron, I have done this but it only adds one document at one size to the list of presets. The list of sizes that comes with it is the same as the preset it was created from originally. What I would like to do is add to the list of sizes which comes with any one of the document presets or create a new one with a new list of sizes.

Help with Custom Sequence Settings

I'm wondering if anyone might be able to assist me with a question I have regarding custom setups and timeline rendering?
I am working on a sequence of still images (.*tiff files) in a custom timeline that I've setup to match the resolution of the 30" Apple Cinema Display (2560x1600).
Up until this point, whenever I work with high resolution (*.tiff) images in a 1920x1080 sequence, the images are often twice the resolution 3840x2160 and do not require any rendering. They automatically scale to the dimensions of the timeline and everything is just straight forward.
The problem I'm having now, is that whenever I drop a 3840x2160 image into my custom 2560x1600 sequence, the image still scale to fit the sequence, but I immediately get a solid red bar across the top of my timeline and cannot figure out why I need to render everything. All of my sequence settings are the same with the exception of the dimensions and interlacing disabled.
Here are the sequence settings:
Frame Size: 2560 x 1600 Custom
Pixel Aspect Ratio: Square
Field Dominance: None
Editing Timebase: 29.97
QT Video Settings: Apple ProRes 422 (no interlacing)
If anyone knows of a way that I can setup a custom sequence such as this without having to render everything right from the start, I would greatly appreciate any tips on how to do this...
Thanks!
~Greg

My guts say, you can't. RT Extreme is the technology FCP uses to playback without rendering. It likely is only turned on for standard video resolutions. (i.e., those that are shot by video cameras or electronic cinema cameras - like RED 2k). That might be the largest you can work with without rendering. It's 2048 X 1152 for a 16:9 image... Just guessing, but bet I'm close to right here. Filling your CD though will not be a standard video size at all, because it isn't 16:9... it's 16:10 so might not be able to do what you like to see I'm afraid without rendering.
Jerry

Problems with custom cropping

I'm evaluating Aperture 3 as a replacement for Lightroom and am looking for help with a cropping problem, which is a potential show-stopper. My requirement is to provide a set of images for a web site that are exactly 386x240 pixels.
Using the Crop Tool, I define a custom crop ratio of 386x240 for the first image, and apply it. Then using the Lift & Stamp tool, I apply the same crop ratio to the other images.
Next steps in the workflow are to adjust the crop area on each image, then export the group of images to "fit within 386x240".
But when I go back through the images to adjust the actual crop area, that's where the problem comes up. Aperture chooses NOT to remember the custom ratio of 386x240 I have applied to each image. Rather it replaces that ratio in the Crop Tool with it's pre-defined "Main Display Aspect Ratio" of 1920x1200, and applies that ratio when the crop area is adjusted! As a result, the exported image ends up the wrong size.
So it seems Aperture is making an incorrect decision about the existing ratio when adjusting the crop. (My ratio is close to the Main Display ratio, but not the same; my ratio extrapolates to 1930x1200, not 1920x1200).
I'll admit to being new to Aperture with version 3, but this seems like a bug. Shouldn't Aperture remember the exact custom ratio I initially applied to each image? Is there anything wrong with the steps in my workflow? Any ideas as to how to make this work? Thanks.

Wow...if this has been going on since Aperture 2 then Apple's engineers either (1) don't care, or (2) think they have a useful "smart" feature. Unfortunately, when software tries to be too smart it sometimes fails. On the surface, this is a simple fix. If an image custom crop ratio is not in the predefined list, LEAVE IT ALONE! Don't make any assumptions on the user's behalf and change it to something that isn't wanted.
Also, as discussed in a related thread, the lack of a capability to save and manage custom crop ratios for use in the future is another shortcoming in cropping functionality.
Aperture 3 has a lot of great features going for it, especially as compared to LR2. Unfortunately, cropping isn't one of them.

How to union results from 3 different dimensions in where clause with or - Mdx query

Hi
I have a MDX Query and i need to pass the variable values to it by dynamically.
Each time it will get any one attribute from three dimensions.
Select
{} ON Columns,
{} ON Rows
From
Cube
Where
[Dimension1].[Attribut].&[Value]
or
[Dimension2].[Attribut2].&[Value]
or
[Dimension3].[Attribut3].&[Value]
So It is working for two different values by using union and cross join.
Can you please provide the solution ..
Thanks in advance

Hi Philip
Thanks for replying me.
I tried on that way, In my mdx query i am using one slice attribute (i.e [Customer].[Gender].allmembers) in rows so getting error "The Hierarchy already appears in Axis1".
SELECT
{[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount] } ON 0,
NON EMPTY
{[Customer].[Gender].allmembers } ON 1 -- Used
FROM
[Adventure Works]
WHERE
[Customer].[Gender].&[M]
,[Product].[Size Range].[(All)]
,[Customer].[Country].[All Customers]
[Customer].[Gender].[All Customers]
,[Product].[Size Range].&[XL]
,[Customer].[Country].[All Customers]
[Customer].[Gender].[All Customers]
,[Product].[Size Range].[(All)]
,[Customer].[Country].&[Australia]
Can you provide alternate ways to get resolved.
Thanks in advance

Dimension size docment size resolution

Use the picture on website.
Really no idea with Resolution, Document Size, Dimension Size and Fit Image Function.
Use on Website, don't need to care the Document Size, right?
Changing with Resolution Size and Resolution, some time, the Resolution is about 100 but the dimension Size is very high about 2500 to 3000 pixels.
Change the Dimension Size will change the Resolution very very small in this case.
Fit image can fix the size shows in the website site?

When you use Photoshop to do things resolution matters. So when adding watermaks to different siz images it can be tricky to handle size. You will see that in my sample watermarking action.
Crafting Actions Package UPDATED Aug 10, 2014 Added Conditional Action steps to Action Palette Tips.
Contains
Action Actions Palette Tips.txt
Action Creation Guidelines.txt
Action Dealing with Image Size.txt
Action Enhanced via Scripted Photoshop Functions.txt
CraftedActions.atn Sample Action set includes an example Watermarking action
Sample Actions.txt Photoshop CraftedActions set saved as a text file.
More then a dozen Scripts for use in actions
Example
Download

How we will know that dimension size is more than the fact table size?

how we will know that dimension size is more than the fact table size?

Hi,
Let us assume that we are going to take Division and distribution channel in a dimension and assume we have 20 distinct values for Division in R/3 and 30 Distinct values for Distribution channel .So Maximum, we can get 20 * 30 records in dimension table and we can take rough estimation of records in the cube by observing the raw data in source system.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Creating 3d Cube with Custom Texture in CS6

Hi All,
Spent the whole day at work, trying to figure out how to create a 3d box in CS6 with custom texture. Before explaining my problem, i saw couple of good 3d onject videos already, they helped me alot and i am close to my target but yet not finished
Problem:
I would like to create a 3d product box with custom textures, reflection and shadows. I have my top, front, back and side images in high quality.
My Solution:
1- With my box TOP image, i create the 3d layer.
2- Because it creates the box with the top image looking front, i position it as the top image comes to the top of the box.
3- I resize the box to the dimensions i would like to.
4- Side, front and back textures are missing. As its a custom made box, i can only add all of them in one image so i merge them vertically in a file and add the texture in 3d section
5- With UV scaling, i fit the image perfectly
6- Adding light and reflections
7- Render
Now the main problem is, my images have the exact measures of the real product box and i would like to create a box with these dimensions.
1- How can i play with the dimensions of the 3d box with numbers, such as pixel or cm ? As i can see, its only with %. Or is there an option so when i add the second image (side, front and back, merged), box's length dimension changes accordingly?
2- How can i create 3d box and add different textures to different part of the box? I found CUBE MESH PRESET in the forums but no download link, EVEN IN THE DISCCUSION itself
3- I have a i5-3570 , 8GB Ram, 1GB Radeon HD7750 at work, newly built. I work with high resolution files, and when i create my box and render it, some parts come out blur, why this is happening? At home i have a older PC, and it doesnt happen that much. Where i can modify the render quality or such a thing if it exists?
Thanks in advance, this bugs me alot, if someone helps with this, i will be really happy !
Buri

The long and short version is: Use a 3D program. Blender is free, after all.
1- How can i play with the dimensions of the 3d box with numbers, such as pixel or cm ?
You can't. All units in PS are relativeand normalized to the scene.
2- How can i create 3d box and add different textures to different part of the box? I found CUBE MESH PRESET in the forums but no download link, EVEN IN THE DISCCUSION itself
That's what 3D-programs and UV layout tools are for. Creating an unfolded cube UV set is a 10 second thing. Here's one: http://www.mylenium.de/_temp/uv_box.zip.
Where i can modify the render quality or such a thing if it exists?
Select the Scene root to change the render mode and quality and also check the 3D section in the prefs.
Mylenium

How to print jTable with custom header and footer....

Hello all,
I'm trying to print a jTable with custom header and footer.But
jTable1.print(PrintMode,headerFormat,footerFormat,showPrintDialog,attr,interactive)
does not allow multi line header and footer. I read in a chat that we can make custom header and footer and wrap the printable with that of the jTable. How can we do that..
Here's the instruction on the chat...
Shannon Hickey: While the default Header and Footer support in the JTable printing won't do exactly what you're looking for, there is a straight-forward approach. You can turn off the default header/footer and then wrap JTable's printable inside another Printable. This wrapper printable would then render your custom data, and then adjust the size given to the wrapped printable
But how can i wrap the jTable's Printable with the custom header and footer.
Thanks in advance,

I also once hoped for an easy way to modify a table's header and footer, but found no way.
Yet it is possible.

Dimension size in LR4 with custom ratio

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for