Direct Posting to G/L Account in MIRO

Question

Hi,
I have created a Purchase Order with following conditions
Qty     50
Price     100
Total (Accessible Value for Excise)     5000
Excise     500
Ecess     10
HSCess     5
Total Excise     515
Total+Excise For VAT     5515
VAT     744.525
Total Payable to Vendor     6259.525
Here please note that the Excise is being calculated on Rs. 5000.
When we receive the Excise Invoice, the Vendor is charging the Excise on different Accessable Value i.e. on Rs. 16000
While posting the Excise Invoice, I have changed the Accessible Value and the following FI document is generated:
24820020     CENVAT Inp SHEcess     6
24820000     CENVAT Inp BED     600
24820010     CENVAT InpEcess     12
13113920     CENVAT clearing     618.00-
While posting the Vendor Invoice, the system is showing a difference in Ecess, SHEcess & VAT Amount as shown below:
K     13000000     PK Industries PVT LTD      6,359.53-
S     13110100     GR/IR-clearing - ext procurement - Dom     5,000.00
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     600
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     10
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     5
S     24638100     VAT Recoverable     744.53
To match the difference we posted the difference in VAT & Cenvat the G/L Account tab and Rs, 135.01- in Unpl. Del. Csts
The system is generating the following FI Entries
K     13000000     PK Industries PVT LTD      6,376.43-                    **
S     13110100     GR/IR-clearing - ext procurement - Dom     5,000.00     4500000841     EE
M     24340000     SinarMatArtCard>220gsm63.5x91"     131.03-     4500000841     EE
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     1.95                    V0
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     0.97                    V0
S     24638100     VAT Recoverable     145.01                     
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     600                    EE
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     10                    EE
S     13113920     CENVAT clearing     5                    EE
S     24638100     VAT Recoverable     744.53                    EE
My question/ doubt is:
1.     Is this the correct way to pass the difference in VAT & Excise directly to G/L Accounts?
2.     Why in MIRO, the BED is correct & ECess & HSCess are wrong? Is this related with Tax Procedure & Pricing Procedure?
3.     What is the standard way for handling the above situation. Please note that this situation is coming for only one Excise Vendor.
Please advise.
Regards,

Answer 1

1.In J1IEX, we could not found MRP Indicator check box in miscellaneous tab.
Where do we need to change in the Configuration.
Refer this thread [MRP indicator|Re: MRP indicator]
2.While posting the MIRO, the following entries were generated, which is wrong?
Here tax amount being calculate is wrong;
it should be 240 as per the manual. On simulation, the ECess amount is not shown.
As suggested in earlier reply,Please check tax procedure with help of FI consultant.
3.When capturing the Invoice in MIGO, MRP Indicator check box was there in Miscellaneous tab.
But the HSCess was not in editable mode, we could just enter the Basic Duty & ECess Amount.
There are lot of threads regarding hecess not editable,Pl search.
If possible can you please provide the details of the process from PO to MIRO
along with FI Entries so that I can test the same again (to get a clear cut concept of the process).
1.Purchase order with price + excise values with dealer tax code.
2. GR with excise (capture & post) or
A.Capture excise with ref. to p.o using J1IEX,tick mark mrp indicator,change excise base value,enter other excise amounts.
B. GR with ref. to ex. inv. no(In step A) - Refer exise invoice only
C. Post excise with ref. to ex. inv. no.
3. Vendor invoice ref. to delivery note no.
FI entries for GR
Stock account Dr to GR/IR a/c
Excise entries
Cenvat payable ED,CS,HECS Dr to Cenvat clearing a/c
Vendor invoice entries
GR/IR A/c,Cenvat clearing a/c,VAT/CST a/c  Dr to Vendor a/c
Hope it solves problem.
Note :
I will suggest you to search forum before posting basic questions.
Don;t post multiple questions.
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Nov 4, 2010 3:05 PM