Direct reportees for MSS

hello gurus,
My requirement is when a Manager logs in thru MSS he can only view the direct reportess & their details. Say a Department may have 1 head & 2 Managers. So each manager can view only the direct reportees when he logs in the MSS.
Currently the reporting display is possible only if i assign A/012 relationship & this wud display all reportees under this dept.
Reading the threads i assumed changing the evaluation path will help but am confused as how to do it. In SPRO under OADP there are steps to be maintained Eg - Define Rules for Object Selection. When i go to this step which std entry do i copy & wht evaluation path can i use to get the desired result.
Pls help me.
rgds,

Hi siddharth,
thnk u so much for the reply
i have already gone thru this link & with its help made the changes.
My requirement is when a Manager logs in MSS he can only view the direct reportees under him
currently my observation is that the reporting structure is visible only if the Manager is assigned A/012 relationship. If i remove this relationship then there is no display of reporting structure.
i copied the standard entries & modified acc to my requirements.
(A) Object Selection Rule : - Z_MSS_TMV_RULE1 (Evaluation Path - SAP_MANG)
                                             Z_MSS_TMV_RULE5 (Evaluation Path - MSSDIREC)
(B) Selection Rule :- ZMSS_TMV_EE_DIR
               Rule for Root Object = Z_MSS_TMV_RULE1
               Rule for Target Object = Z_MSS_TMV_RULE5
(C) Organizational Structure Views :- ZMSS_TMV_EE_DIR
              Obj Sel = ZMSS_TMV_EE_DIR
              Grp of Data Views = MSS_TMV_EE
(D) Group Organisational Structure Views :- Z_MSS_TMV_EE
              Org Struct View = ZMSS_TMV_EE_DIR
I have copied the Std entry MSS_TMV_EE for the above config
1) Can u suggest what more i need to add to the config to get the desired result
2) Where & which FUNTION MODULE to use
3) Which other evaluation path can i use to get the desired output?? (i tried changing the evalution path for Target Object & no data was displayed)
3) Is is mandatory to assign A 012 relationship to the Manager?? Because i only want direct reportees & if i assign A012 then all the subordinates in the Org Unit will be dispalyed where as i only want direct reportees tobe displayed.
all help is highly appreciated. Pls help me resolve this
rgds,

Similar Messages

  • Issue in direct reportees for manager in MSS Team

    Hi all,
    I have configured my system according to the document Manager Self-Service (MSS) - MSS team view, managers who do not hold chief position prepared by Mohsin Syed .
    In MSS-> Team -> Employee information I am getting the direct employees even the manager is not chief.
    But my problem is same manager cannot see the direct reportes in other places say :  attendance overview , employee course assignments-> manage participants etc..
    see the screenshots : In the same page, no direct reporting employee for attendance over view , but there is for Team calendar.
    For the same manager, if he try to book for training, there is no direct reportees.
    What I have missed ..please guide me what to do..
    Thanks,
    Namsheed

    Dear Mohsin,
    In the Table TWPC_DAATAVWGRP,  I have created the new entry 'MSS_LAV_EE1. Assigned to group of Data views in "MSS_LAV_EE_DIR1".
    Then in Object and Data Provider -> Organizational Structure Views -> Group Organizational Structure Views,
    MSS_LAV_EE -> Assign Organizational view , I have added 1 more entry MSS_LAV_EE_DIR1(Direct Reports)
    Then In NWBC I have got a new option Direct Reports and under that I have got 1 person as Absent. but 2 person at work is not showing. Actually there are 3 direct reportees to him.
    this is 1 concern
    Under Working time->Attendance overview->Select Employees, it is like this :
    1 more thing.
    Under  MSS-> Team-> Employee course Assignments-> Manage Participants : For manager who is Chief can see all direct reportees and book training for them.
    For manager who is not chief are not getting the direct reportees so that he cannot book training for them.
    If I can retrieve the direct reportees here, then all issues are solved.
    Kindly help me with what changes I have to make in system.
    Thanks a lot,
    Namsheed.

  • Reports available in the Business Package for MSS and ESS

    Hi,
    I have searched sdn.sap.com throughout looking for a comprehensive list of reports available in the business packages for both MSS and ESS, i got a little bit of joy and found some of the MSS reports but not all on sdn.sap.com, can anyone please advise where i would find such information on both these packages, just to re-iterate, i am looking for a list of reports these business packages offer? any help much appreciated.
    Thanks
    John
    P.s any documents can be sent to [email protected]

    @John
    (1) ESS- We built our own custom PORTAL role/workset in which one of the worksets we created is called "Tools and Forms". Under that workset, we placed various pages/iViews that either are simple URL iViews that link to external documents and such (like vacation request forms since they do not do online leave requests yet) as well as a couple ot t-code iViews that run reports in ECC for the employee. Nothing very mind blowing there. Just some content creation on the portal side.....oh, and some config on the backend to create a Homepage Framework Area Page and all for it (I liked that part!)
    (2) Wow....talk about perfect timing...I just had to document the way MSS sees the MDT reports in it's "reporting" area yesterday! haha Here goes the quick explaination....in configuration for MDT, you have various "scenarios". These kinda determine which "groups" of reports will show in MDT. For MSS for the Reporting webdynpro/service, the scenario is RPT0 (in ECC 5.0, at least). Soooo if you look at the function CODES assigned to RPT0, you will see several for Training and one for Accounting (Cost Centers)...you can reference the function CODES listed back to the "pool"/library of function codes a bit up/previous in the same config area for MDT(I think it is called "Define Function Codes"). However, there is one more piece you will see listed under RPT0....it is a DIRECT call to function MODULE "HR_HIS_READ" (this was a bugger to find because I could not find the "Maternity" report listed in the function codes and had to figure out where the heck it was coming from! haha). Anyways....what the function MODULE actually does is call the HR Information System (HIS) passing it the RPT0/MSS scenario. This returns the particular reports for Employee Data and Time&Attendance. You can see this if you run the HR_HIS_READ function directly and enter RPT0 for the second input value (first and third are not needed or you can just enter "*". Sooooo that is how the "magic" happens. Hope that explained it. From there, you can simply config you own scenario/reports to add into MSS if you like.
    Hope this helped!

  • Disabled accounts showing up under direct reportee in AD accounts

    We are using AD server 2003. We use peoplesoft and oracle identity manager to sync user details with AD.
    We are facing a problem where some of the disabled users have manager name in their 'direct reportee' field in AD. These user accounts are admin accounts and do not have exchange features (exchange account). Also, these admin accounts are not synced by peoplesoft or exchange (We do not keep records of these admin accounts in Peoplesoft). OIM does have details about these admin accounts and also has User Principal Name value for these accounts. The status for most of these admin accounts in OIM is disabled and their exchange account is 'revoked' (just ivestigated..if this information can be of any help).
    If we clear the direct reportee field manually from these admin accounts..problem reoccurs after a few days..we do not want 'direct reportee' field to have any user's name in it for these accounts. We have consulted this issue in microsoft technet forum and were advised to contact OIM support.
    Can somebody suggest what can be root cause.
    Edited by: 998461 on Apr 6, 2013 4:34 PM

    That won't prevent the accounts from being on SharePoint, it will just prevent them from being part of the UPA sync. You could also throw them all in an OU and just de-select that OU from being synchronized. Don't forget to delete their user profile from
    the UPA after you make the change.
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Is there any Fm or Bapi available to see the direct reportees of a manager

    Is there any Fm or Bapi available to see the direct reportees of a manager
    i have the managers id could i get the employees under that manager
    is there any SAp fm for the same

    Like Aditya, I have not seen such a function module. However, there is a standard evaluation path which may be suitable for your purpose. It is called BOSSORG and will give you all the employees under a manager.
    Use it with function module RH_GET_STRUCTURE or RH_STRUC_GET. The latter lets you specify parameters directly, while the former takes them in container form. None of them are released for customer use unfortunately, but I haven't found a corresponding function module that is released.

  • Evaluation path for MSS role

    Hi all,
    Is there a way to assign MSS role dynamically to an employee if he has employees reporting to him?
    We have got to know that this can be achieved by configuring some evaluation path.
    Any pointers would be appreciated!
    TIA!

    Diana,
    Where actually do you assign the roles ,is it in the portal or you have a CUA system where all the role maintenance is done over there.if second one is true you can write a custom program and assign the role by checking the direct reportees
    Thanks
    Bala Duvvuri

  • This is actually in response to varjak paw's reply to my question, but I am unable to directly reply for some reason hence the separate post, but so it's open to anyone to answer

    This is actually in response to varjak paw's reply to my question (thank you!), but I am unable to directly reply for some reason hence the separate post, but so it's open to anyone to answer. Anyway, my original question was
    Hello, I am from a Korean institution. We are looking into enrolling in iTunes U, but are aware that our country, South Korea, is yet enrolled in the iTunes U. Can our institution still enroll and if so, what is the procedure? Or do we have to wait for our country to be enrolled in iTunes U first? We're surprised South Korea isn't listed yet among the 26 countries so far, considering how it's one of the more developed countries and also highly advanced in the technology field. Thank you!
    Varjak paw's answer:
    Sorry, but iTunes U is not available to institutions in South Korea at this time. It is only available to institutions in those countries on the list. Why Apple has not yet been able to provide that service in your country or when (or indeed if) they ever will is something none of us here can say.
    Regards.
    My follow-up question:
    So then, is if there's a general standard procedure country governments have to follow in order to have the iTunes U service provided (ex. a site/online application on Apple). So in other words, if the Korean government were interested in enrolling in iTunes U, what would they have to do/what channel(s) would they have to go through? We are a government-affiliated institution so if we're provided the necessary steps, we may be able to forward the procedure along to the right government body that would be responsible for setting this up.
    Any information would be appreciated, thank you!

    As I said in your original post, iTunes U is not available to any institution, government or otherwise, in South Korea. If or when Apple will extend iTunes U to your country is something none of us here can say, and Apple will not until such time as they're ready to make an announcement. What Apple's criteria and requirements are for being able to open iTunes U in a given country is unknown; there is no "procedure" that any of us here can state or direct you to that you could initiate. It's totally up to Apple, and if they are working on this, I'm sure they know who in the SK government they would need to work with.
    Sorry, but you will just have to wait and hope that something develops in the future.
    Regards.

  • What are the roles required for MSS

    What are the roles required for MSS in R/3.
    I have created ESS roles. But need to find for MSS.
    I am able to see the PERNR in ESS on portal which created in R/3.
    I need to get my staff on portal.
    What config is required for this.
    MSS User.

    HI
    you will  have to create manager as portal role and assigned to them  necessary worksets containing necessary worksets  look into the PCD in migrated content and line *?? folder you will have necessary ESS and Mss packages. and all configs is related to iviews system properties and transactions  and applications you need to do it .please do not forget to give points
    with regards
    subrato kundu

  • To change the Email retrieval logic for MSS in Portal

    Hi All,
    In standard MSS Business Package for employee selection Iview, under column email, manager get an option to send mail to employee by clicking on highlighted send option.
    At present the option "SEND" get highlighted if the email value is maintained in IT0105 and manager is able to send mail to employee on the same email address.
    Now in my scenario instead of getting the email address from IT0105, I need to get the email address maintained in transaction SU01.
    And the problem in doing this is, for highlighting the "SEND" link under employee selection ivew, standard SAP code uses a
    method GET_EMAIL_ADDRESS of class CL_HRWPC_SER_EMAIL in which they use a function module HRWPC_READ_CONTACT to check if the email address exist in IT0105 or not.
    I can overite this check by using a implicit enhancement in method GET_EMAIL_ADDRESS based on email in SU01. But my concern is, if use an implicit
    enhancement, then all the application using this method will retrieve data based on SU01 entry, instead of IT0105.
    This email address retrieval based on SU01 entry is only required for MSS and it is not a common requirement.
    So please suggest me a solution, so that i can get the "SEND" option highlighted only for email address based on SU01 entry only for MSS.
    Also suggest me how to check the which all application are using method GET_EMAIL_ADDRESS.
    As where used list only give me interface where this method is called and interface is called dynamically.
    Thanks
    Namit

    Hi Namit,
    I think your question is more related to in another forum (HCM).
    This is not a portal specific question, but more or less related to function modules and BADIs.
    But maybe someone else can help you on this one. I think there is no list of applications that use GET_EMAIL_ADDRESS. As far as I can remember, the only application that sends emails in ESS/MSS is this teamoverview page.
    Kind regards,
    Noel

  • Any direct installer for Lightroom?  Adobe Application Manager crashes every time (Mac OS 10.9.4)

    I'm trying to migrate from Aperture to Lightroom.  Needless to say the existing help documentation assumes the installer software doesn't crash!
    When using this page:
       https://creative.adobe.com/products/download/lightroom
    The only download link I can access is:
       aam://SAPCode=LTRM?productVersion=5.6?passPhrase=dlC9juiw9Uf9g+Vks1IUflaugqLAqM2EyWucW2/M huZnOYOCur4ZPchERE/PxfIlqFF7/QWRqz+ih8+bvn+J39PlBZwWu33FApnWWqGJO6opmjCzfoFwO73gjpPwAh42tt vFTOwPE+BJB8N6wUFykA/PdAxD9Sn9L2OFSEge5I8=
    Which attempts to launch the Adobe Application Manager to perform the installation.  However, after displaying the loading screen for approximately one second, it crashes.  Is there any way to get a direct download for LightRoom?

    Downloads available:
    Suites and Programs:  CC 2014 | CC | CS6 | CS5.5 | CS5 | CS4 | CS3
    Acrobat:  XI, X | 9,8 | 9 standard
    Premiere Elements:  12 | 11, 10 | 9, 8, 7
    Photoshop Elements:  12 | 11, 10 | 9,8,7
    Lightroom:  5.6| 5 | 4 | 3
    Captivate:  8 | 7 | 6 | 5
    Contribute:  CS5 | CS4, CS3
    Download and installation help for Adobe links
    Download and installation help for Prodesigntools links are listed on most linked pages.  They are critical; especially steps 1, 2 and 3.  If you click a link that does not have those steps listed, open a second window using the Lightroom 3 link to see those 'Important Instructions'.

  • Set up the Organizational structure for MSS scenario

    Hi!
    I would like to set up the Organizational structure for MSS scenario within SAP Portal.
    Question:
    1) How to set up/map real user from SU01 to Manager? (tcode, report)
    2) How to mark them as 'Chief' (tcode, report)
    3) How to be sure that PA & OM are configured correctly and the integration switch is on?
    Which SAP course or SDN blog describes this?
    Thank you very much!
    regards
    Jürgen

    How to be sure that PA & OM are configured correctly and the integration switch is on?
    Check It000 and IT0001 here u will get objects from OM and PA  (position ID , Job Key, organisational Key)
    and integration switch
    check plogi orga , plogi plogi , plogi perli  in V_T77s0
    Edited by: Sikindar on Feb 10, 2009 6:53 PM

  • Organizational structure for MSS scenario

    Hi!
    I would like to set up the Organizational structure for MSS scenario within SAP Portal.
    Question:
    1) How to set up/map real user from SU01 to Manager? (tcode, report)
    2) How to mark them as 'Chief' (tcode, report)
    3) How to be sure that PA & OM are configured correctly and the integration switch is on?
    Which SAP course or SDN blog describes this?
    Thank you very much!
    regards
    Jürgen

    Hi,
    For MSS,
    Perner have the chief position in organization structure   that you can create in transaction PP01 and for relation ship infotype you have tio create 012 relationship.
    Infotype 0105 with subtype System User Name must exist
    PLOGI ORGA Switch MUSt BE Activated
    Regards,
    Kapil

  • Not Able to create Source system for MSS using DB Connect

    hi All,
    i am trying to create a source system for MSS(SQL Server) using DB Connect.
    CAN I KNOW THE ENTIRE PROCEDURE FROM BOTH THE ENDS?
    like how you create the user in SQL Server and
    Do WE NEED ANY ADD-ONS in BW SYSTEM and the Connection Parameters..
    needed immediate HELP...
    ADVANCE THANKS TO ALL

    Hi Lokanth,
    Refer to OSS Note 512739.
    Also check these links:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/58/54f9c1562d104c9465dabd816f3f24/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/58/54f9c1562d104c9465dabd816f3f24/frameset.htm
    Bye
    Dinesh

  • In SFP transaction , when i press layout buton , give me error 'Direct display for documents not activated'

    in SFP transaction;
    when i press layout buton , it give me an error.
    SOFFICEINTEGRATION020
    'Direct display for documents not activated'

    Yes i installed .
    One of our product systems , i take  this error but  another one it works correctly . 

  • Direct Download for Adobe Acrobat X Pro

    I need the direct download for Adobe Acrobat X Pro because my IMAC does not have a disk drive. I had the link to the downloads that was supplied to me through the Chat option on Adobe to get my Adobe Creative Suite 6, but I lost it. I have tried looking through the forums, but I am just not able to find anything. Possibly may not understand where to go, or what to do.

    Hi SweetPea,
    Please use the following link to download Acrobat . Please make sure that you go through the very important information before downloading the product .
    Acrobat X: http://prodesigntools.com/adobe-cs6-direct-download-links.html
    Cheers,
    Kartikay Sharma

Maybe you are looking for