Disconnects (Windows clients - lots are XP SP2)

All,
We have a Tarantella installation where a lot of windows clients (most of
them are XP SP2 based) experience sudden disconnects. (Tarantella 3.3).
Do other people have experience with this?
Are there any known client issues (could not find any on the web)?
Are there any known Windows XP SP2 issues with Tarantella 3.3?
Any advise on which logging to increase to troubleshoot this?
Kind regards,
Arnout

It happened to be in the SSL acceleraters.
However yes keep alive was correct :-)
Thanks!
Arnout
"Rob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:ct8egb$oeg$[email protected]..
Tarantella News wrote:
All,
We have a Tarantella installation where a lot of windows clients (most of
them are XP SP2 based) experience sudden disconnects. (Tarantella 3.3).
Do other people have experience with this?
Are there any known client issues (could not find any on the web)?
Are there any known Windows XP SP2 issues with Tarantella 3.3?
Any advise on which logging to increase to troubleshoot this?
Kind regards,
Arnout
This could be a good starting point:
http://www.tarantella.com/support/documentation/enterprise/e3.4/help/en-us/base/standard/keepalives_changing.html
Best,
Rob

Similar Messages

Where is option to "disconnect wifi clients" from personal hotspot?

According to this Apple Knowledge Base article, there should be an option in Settings > Wifi to "disconnect wifi clients" who are connected to the iPhone via personal hotspot: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4517
I do not see that in the Settings. I am on an iPhone 4, iOS 5.01, AT&T. Does anyone else see this? Was it removed in an iOS update? The KB article says it was updated December 14, 2011, so it should be pretty current.

I too was looking for it and it's. It in my iPhone 4 AT&T 5.0.1 Perhaps it's not in this firmware update, in another location or apple decided to axe this option.
Perhaps they reason that if you're going to disconnect all users, and leaving wifi sharing on was redundant as the wifi will cease to hotspot after 90 seconds anyways, it probably saves battery life... I dunno all I can think of.

Virtual Windows Clients for testing

Rather than having a bunch of local virtual Windows clients (Windows 7, Windows 7 64 bit, Windows 8, Windows 8.1) set up with different Office version for testing our own applications, I'd like to have them on Azure. Only for testing code with our development
partners.
So far I can not find any such offering on the Azure portal.
This Q&A seems to suggest that is not allowed.
http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/licensing-faq/
Can
customers rent Windows Client desktops on Azure or other Service providers?
No, multi-tenant hosting is restricted in the Product Use Rights of Windows Client, such as Windows 7 or Windows 8. Windows Client Desktops are not available on either Azure or on any other Service Provider such as Amazon or Rackspace.
You can read more about the Microsoft Product Use Rights here.
Can
customers run Microsoft Office and Windows 7 Client on Virtual Machines using License Mobility for Software Assurance?
No. Under the Microsoft Product use Rights (PUR), Office and Windows 7 are not licensed to run on Virtual Machines. In particular, Microsoft Office is classified in the PUR as “Desktop Applications”, which is not included in Licensing
Mobility.
Amazon Workspaces?
Seems to be what I want, although only Windows 7 and Office 2010/2013. I also need Visio as our product is an add in to Visio. http://aws.amazon.com/workspaces/
Is this available on Azure and what are my options to get a simple cloud hosted virtual machine with Windows for testing?
Thanks!

Hi,
For MSDN subscribers, Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 images are available when creating a VM in Azure gallery.
http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2014/05/29/windows-client-images-on-azure/
If you have no MSDN subscription, you can upload a Windows client image to Azure storage account and use it to create a VM. However, since the limitation of license
in Azure, you cannot activate it.
In addition, you can also submit a feedback to release the images of Windows client OS in Azure gallery for all subscriptions:
http://feedback.azure.com/forums/34192--general-feedback
Best regards,
Susie
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

OWB Windows Client Accessing Unix Directory

Can a OWB client running on a Windows machine access a Unix Directory Structure?
I'm creating a module for Source flat files using my OWB Client on Windows 2000. Can I access the Unix Direcory structure for these files using the OWB Windows Client.

There are several issues that you may be concerned about here...
First, When you create the Flat File Module you are given the opportunity to enter a directory for this module. This directory is used when importing File metadata via a process OWB calls "sampling". At the time of the "sampling" your OWB client requires direct access to the actual physical flat file. If you are running the OWB client on a Windows PC and wish to access the physical files stored in on a unix machine, you will need some kind of "protocol handler" to make this work. NFS software (i.e. 3rd party) [ as discussed previosly] is the recommended (i.e. highest overall performance, etc) access method. There are others, Samba (which is free, would need to be installed on your unix machine) makes unix directories exported like Windows "shares". These steps are necessary to get direct access to the physical data so that it can be read and help guide you on the way to defining the metadata (ie structure) of the file. If you switch to using a Unix client, the "connection" information for the Flat File Module will have to be "re-entered" to be relative to that particular host.
Second, When you deploy a map which uses the flat file as a source, a SQL*Loader control file will be created to read the data and populate a target table. Im the production versions of OWB, you need to configure the map and supply physical connection information relative to the machine on which the SQL*Loader control file is to be run. So if your database is hosted on a Unix machine, and that is where the SQL*Loader process is to be executed, the "path" information would need to be specified in the unix format and from the database's perspective.

WSUS SP2 Client Systems are not detecting Updates,

I have a WSUS SP2 (with WSUS-KB2720211-x64) running on Windows 2008 R2. The WSUS site is running on custom site port 8530.
All the clients are reporting without any issues. However the approved patches are not getting detected on the clients.
From the client I can get cab file by accessing http://WSUSServerName:8530/iuident.cab
Network connectivity OR firewall issue is ruled out. Also the client system are updating the update agent to
7.6 from WSUS. I am sure the approved patches are needed on the client PC's, the WSUS report for a particular approved patch too says that the approved patch is needed.
Please find the following WIndowsUpdate log from the client PC and please advise.
2015-02-15 14:17:21:387
804 ec4
Misc =========== Logging initialized (build: 7.6.7600.256, tz: +0300) ===========
2015-02-15 14:17:21:387
804 ec4
Misc = Process: C:\Windows\system32\svchost.exe
2015-02-15 14:17:21:387
804 ec4
Misc = Module: c:\windows\system32\wuaueng.dll
2015-02-15 14:17:21:387
804 ec4
Service *************
2015-02-15 14:17:21:387
804 ec4
Service ** START ** Service: Service startup
2015-02-15 14:17:21:387
804 ec4
Service *********
2015-02-15 14:17:21:402
804 ec4
Agent * WU client version 7.6.7600.256
2015-02-15 14:17:21:402
804 ec4
Agent * Base directory: C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution
2015-02-15 14:17:21:402
804 ec4
Agent * Access type: No proxy
2015-02-15 14:17:21:402
804 ec4
Agent * Network state: Connected
2015-02-15 14:17:28:313
804 3f4
Report CWERReporter::Init succeeded
2015-02-15 14:17:28:313
804 3f4
Agent *********** Agent: Initializing Windows Update Agent ***********
2015-02-15 14:17:28:313
804 3f4
Agent *********** Agent: Initializing global settings cache ***********
2015-02-15 14:17:28:313
804 3f4
Agent * WSUS server: http://192.168.1.1:8530
2015-02-15 14:17:28:313
804 3f4
Agent * WSUS status server: http://192.168.1.1:8530
2015-02-15 14:17:28:313
804 3f4
Agent * Target group: (Unassigned Computers)
2015-02-15 14:17:28:313
804 3f4
Agent * Windows Update access disabled: No
2015-02-15 14:17:28:313
804 3f4
DnldMgr Download manager restoring 0 downloads
2015-02-15 14:17:28:313
804 3f4
AU ########### AU: Initializing Automatic Updates ###########
2015-02-15 14:17:28:329
804 3f4
AU # WSUS server: http://192.168.1.1:8530
2015-02-15 14:17:28:329
804 3f4
AU # Detection frequency: 22
2015-02-15 14:17:28:329
804 3f4
AU # Approval type: Pre-install notify (Policy)
2015-02-15 14:17:28:329
804 3f4
AU # Auto-install minor updates: No (User preference)
2015-02-15 14:17:28:329
804 3f4
AU # Will interact with non-admins (Non-admins are elevated (User preference))
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 ec4
Report *********** Report: Initializing static reporting data ***********
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 ec4
Report * OS Version = 6.1.7601.1.0.196880
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 ec4
Report * OS Product Type = 0x00000007
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 ec4
Report * Computer Brand = VMware, Inc.
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 ec4
Report * Computer Model = VMware Virtual Platform
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 ec4
Report * Bios Revision = 6.00
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 ec4
Report * Bios Name = PhoenixBIOS 4.0 Release 6.0
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 ec4
Report * Bios Release Date = 2013-07-30T00:00:00
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 ec4
Report * Locale ID = 1033
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 3f4
AU Successfully wrote event for AU health state:0
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 3f4
AU Initializing featured updates
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 3f4
AU Found 0 cached featured updates
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 3f4
AU Successfully wrote event for AU health state:0
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 3f4
AU Successfully wrote event for AU health state:0
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 3f4
AU AU finished delayed initialization
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 3f4
AU Triggering AU detection through DetectNow API
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 3f4
AU Triggering Online detection (non-interactive)
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 ec4
AU #############
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 ec4
AU ## START ## AU: Search for updates
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 ec4
AU #########
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 ec4
AU <<## SUBMITTED ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {0512C3B0-1E35-4BDD-9B28-02E064DF3EFB}]
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 56c
Agent *************
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 56c
Agent ** START ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 56c
Agent *********
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 56c
Agent * Online = Yes; Ignore download priority = No
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 56c
Agent * Criteria = "IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' or IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' or IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and RebootRequired=1 or IsInstalled=0
and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and RebootRequired=1"
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 56c
Agent * ServiceID = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7} Managed
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 56c
Agent * Search Scope = {Machine}
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 56c
Setup Checking for agent SelfUpdate
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 56c
Setup Client version: Core: 7.6.7600.256 Aux: 7.6.7600.256
2015-02-15 14:17:28:360
804 56c
Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\wuident.cab:
2015-02-15 14:17:28:375
804 56c
Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2015-02-15 14:17:30:981
804 56c
Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\wuident.cab:
2015-02-15 14:17:30:981
804 56c
Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2015-02-15 14:17:30:981
804 56c
Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\wsus3setup.cab:
2015-02-15 14:17:30:981
804 56c
Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2015-02-15 14:17:30:981
804 56c
Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\wsus3setup.cab:
2015-02-15 14:17:30:981
804 56c
Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2015-02-15 14:17:30:996
804 56c
Setup Determining whether a new setup handler needs to be downloaded
2015-02-15 14:17:30:996
804 56c
Setup SelfUpdate handler is not found. It will be downloaded
2015-02-15 14:17:30:996
804 56c
Setup Evaluating applicability of setup package "WUClient-SelfUpdate-ActiveX~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~7.6.7600.256"
2015-02-15 14:17:30:996
804 56c
Setup Setup package "WUClient-SelfUpdate-ActiveX~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~7.6.7600.256" is already installed.
2015-02-15 14:17:30:996
804 56c
Setup Evaluating applicability of setup package "WUClient-SelfUpdate-Aux-TopLevel~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~7.6.7600.256"
2015-02-15 14:17:31:012
804 56c
Setup Setup package "WUClient-SelfUpdate-Aux-TopLevel~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~7.6.7600.256" is already installed.
2015-02-15 14:17:31:012
804 56c
Setup Evaluating applicability of setup package "WUClient-SelfUpdate-Core-TopLevel~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~7.6.7600.256"
2015-02-15 14:17:31:012
804 56c
Setup Setup package "WUClient-SelfUpdate-Core-TopLevel~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~7.6.7600.256" is already installed.
2015-02-15 14:17:31:012
804 56c
Setup SelfUpdate check completed. SelfUpdate is NOT required.
2015-02-15 14:17:31:449
804 56c
PT +++++++++++ PT: Synchronizing server updates +++++++++++
2015-02-15 14:17:31:449
804 56c
PT + ServiceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}, Server URL = http://192.168.1.1:8530/ClientWebService/client.asmx
2015-02-15 14:17:36:721
804 56c
Agent * Found 0 updates and 76 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 724 out of 1278 deployed entities
2015-02-15 14:17:36:721
804 56c
Agent *********
2015-02-15 14:17:36:721
804 56c
Agent ** END ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
2015-02-15 14:17:36:721
804 56c
Agent *************
2015-02-15 14:17:36:737
804 c4c
AU >>## RESUMED ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {0512C3B0-1E35-4BDD-9B28-02E064DF3EFB}]
2015-02-15 14:17:36:737
804 c4c
AU # 0 updates detected
2015-02-15 14:17:36:737
804 c4c
AU #########
2015-02-15 14:17:36:737
804 c4c
AU ## END ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {0512C3B0-1E35-4BDD-9B28-02E064DF3EFB}]
2015-02-15 14:17:36:737
804 c4c
AU #############
2015-02-15 14:17:36:737
804 c4c
AU Successfully wrote event for AU health state:0
2015-02-15 14:17:36:737
804 c4c
AU Featured notifications is disabled.
2015-02-15 14:17:36:737
804 c4c
AU AU setting next detection timeout to 2015-02-16 07:41:21
2015-02-15 14:17:36:737
804 c4c
AU Successfully wrote event for AU health state:0
2015-02-15 14:17:36:737
804 c4c
AU Successfully wrote event for AU health state:0
2015-02-15 14:17:36:784
804 56c
Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
2015-02-15 14:17:41:729
804 56c
Report REPORT EVENT: {6EBDD70F-EF5E-4673-9283-1A94A5FC5A0C}
2015-02-15 14:17:36:721+0300 1
147 101
{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}
0 0 AutomaticUpdates
Success Software Synchronization
Windows Update Client successfully detected 0 updates.
2015-02-15 14:17:41:729
804 56c
Report REPORT EVENT: {621A5AA7-E564-44F1-B16B-5E928ECE4BC0}
2015-02-15 14:17:36:721+0300 1
156 101
{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}
0 0 AutomaticUpdates
Success Pre-Deployment Check
Reporting client status.
2015-02-15 14:17:41:729
804 56c
Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)

KB2720211 has been superceded by KB 2828185, I'd recommend installing that first, it resolves a lot of issues with the first update.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/wsus/archive/2013/04/16/update-solution-for-wsus-export-bug-is-now-available-for-wsus-3-x-sp2.aspx
https://support.microsoft.com/kb/2828185
It would be worth checking if those updates you think should be installed haven't already been superceded by others. It's possible newer updates have been installed, so the superceded updates could actually be declined.

GroupWise 2012 SP2 Windows Client - Windows 8.1 x64

I have installed GroupWise 2012 SP2 Windows Client on a Windows 8.1 x64 laptop.
I can run GW for the first time, and it works fine.
When I close GW, and then reopen it I get the following error:
GroupWise is not properly installed. The GroupWise components could not be initialized. Please run GroupWise setup, or contact your system administrator.
A reboot will not fix the problem. If I completely remove GW and then reinstall it works fine, however once you close GW and then reopen it, you get the above message again.
Does anyone have any ideas?
Thank to everyone in advance.
Cheers,
Anthony Hill
Network Administrator
Mount Alvernia College

Originally Posted by konecnya
In article <[email protected]>, Anthonywhill
wrote:
> Yes I have the entire Office 2013 suite installed. Maybe Outlook is the
> problem?
>
Possibly, which was installed first?
Both Outlook and GroupWise use MAPI, and the files Outlook places are the
newer one, but it doesn't always do so if the older ones are in place.
Andy of
KonecnyConsulting.ca in Toronto
Knowledge Partner
http://forums.novell.com/member.php/75037-konecnya
If you find a post helpful and are logged in the Web interface, please
show your appreciation by clicking on the star below. Thanks!
Hi,
I have the same problem.
You resolve your ?

Files locked when Windows clients are connected to ML Server via smb

Hi,
I've got a problem with windows 7 clients that are connected to my MacMini Server.
When they open files on a shared folder, and modify them, files are locked when they try to save them.
I think it might be the op-lock option present in older versions of Mac OS X Server that can be involved, but it disapeared in Lion and older version of OS X Server.
Does someone knows how to activate/deactivate this option, or does someone already got this problem?
Server is a MacMini with 10.8.5 + Server 2.2.2
Clients are Windows 7
Thank a lot for your answers
Bertrand.

Officially, Adobe does not support opening or saving files to a server --- because so many different things can go wrong with networking.
The permissions error means that the file/directory permissions are incorrect on the file server, or that the OS or server is incorrectly reporting file/directory permissions.
Photoshop does more error checking than most applications, because we have seen so many problems in the past, and don't like applications silently losing or damaging files (which we see in other applications).

I was trying to set Adobe Reader 11 as default PDF viewer on my client PCs, Please help me this. My server is windows 2012 R2 and client PCs are Windows 8.1

I was trying to set Adobe Reader 11 as default PDF viewer on my client PCs, Please help me this. My server is windows 2012 R2 and client PCs are Windows 8.1

Hi Krisis,
I have found a forum where similar query was answered. Hope this helps.
http://www.loginvsi.com/forum/support-v4/857-adobe-reader-xi-not-set-as-default-pdf-viewer -in-server-2012-r2-rds
Regards,
Anoop

Please fix: Common Open File Dialog Box to support Favorites (Follow-up: Better provisioning in the Windows client)

One more thing:
What's missing is favorites is a way to use the favorites space in the Common Open File Dialog Box.
Please obsolete or (re)develop components in Windows, so those components support any new workflows in Windows!
On example of an application where you cannot use Favorites is Adobe Photoshop. It uses the Common Open File Dialog Box in Windows (which does not support Favorites).
Comparing Finder (MacOS) with Windows Explorer - you "seem" to have the option of using favorites to pin folders.
Well, if your application calls Windows to use the Common Open File Dialog Box - it's actually NOT POSSIBLE AT ALL to navigate to the user concepts (user folders) pinned to favorites.
Again, the favorites namespace is completely unused (not provisioned) out-of-the-box. That's may be ok, however it's not fully implemented across Windows and just another example of stuff accumulating up to being unusable.
What's missing is favorites is a way to use the favorites space in the Common Open File Dialog Box.
Ref.: Better provisioning in the Windows client
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/dbb2102f-00b7-47ca-88f2-4f88cd9d3409/followup-starting-launching-and-switching-?forum=WinPreview2014Feedback#2aba34e9-6074-4750-8f66-425bdeacc705
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/168bb9f9-ab18-42e6-9f20-5e36e71f742c/merging-the-task-bar-and-the-start-screen-area?forum=WinPreview2014Feedback#168bb9f9-ab18-42e6-9f20-5e36e71f742c
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/59a5bb6a-0368-4f34-bea4-b9811ac0bf8c/dont-forget-development-of-the-start-screen-remember-virtualization-of-it-too-purpose-is-hud?forum=WinPreview2014Feedback#59a5bb6a-0368-4f34-bea4-b9811ac0bf8c
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c10168fe-a534-44aa-a0ec-e9defc71da5f/better-provisioning-in-windows-client-remember-templates-for-the-start-screen-like-the-need-for?forum=WinPreview2014Feedback#c10168fe-a534-44aa-a0ec-e9defc71da5f

Congrats to Carmelo!
Windows Phone and Windows Store Apps Technical Guru - February 2015
Carmelo La Monica
Windows Phone 8: control Nokia Maps (Part 3)
JH: "Part 3 of the series how to work with the Nokia maps control. As the previous articles this one contains a lot of code snippets and some pictures. Good work!"
Ed Price: "A great topic, a fantastic breakdown of sections with clear descriptions, and a nice mix of code formatting and helpful images! Another stellar article from Carmelo! Great job including the link back at the end to the portal
article!"
Ed Price, Azure & Power BI Customer Program Manager (Blog,
Small Basic,
Wiki Ninjas,
Wiki)
Answer an interesting question?
Create a wiki article about it!

Windows client intermittent connection to PEAP WIFI backed off to ISE 1.2 wildcard cert

I am setting up a topology whwere for the first time I am deplying ISE with a wildcard certificate. This is on ISE 1.2 patch 6, WLC's running 7.6 and Windows 7 clients in AD. The ISE policy is just to match on machine auth.
The setting up of the wildcard cert went ok as guided by the CCO ISE 1.2 deployment/cfg guide.
When it came to testing the client auth as always I start off with the PEAP settings of Validate server certificate off, just to confirm the WLC and ISE are playing ball. They were, the auth passed.
I then tick the Validate server certificate, make sure the CA (Windows AD) is in the Trusted Root Certification Authorities. Retest and the client passes.
If I then disconnect the wifi and reconnect, either manually or by doing a reboot, the next authenticaiton fails, but nothing has changed. ISE reports that my Windows client rejected the server certificate. Which is odd as it just accepted it.
If I untick the validate the client passes, if i tick it again it will authenticate fine, once. The next connection it will fail again with the client rejecting ISE.
Anyone got any ideas?

I have had a similar issue consistently with 1.2 on both pathc 5 and 6 (not sure about earlier one). Basically what I am seeing is the client rejecting the Server cert when validate is unticked. Most of the time the client connects just fine a few seconds later but some clients need a reboot to fix it. As a rule I put this down to client issue but not 100% sure some times.

BO - Problem to connect through windows client

Server OS: Windows Server 2003 SP2
BOE Version: XI Release 2
Client SO: Windows XP Professional SP2
DB: Oracle 10 v 10.2
Problem:
I have a BOE XI Release 2 installed on a server and if I try to connect via WEB everything is perfect but when I try to connect using windows clients (Designer, DESKiu2026)
I am getting the following error:
" No se puede acceder al repositorio. (USR0013)"
u201C[repo_proxy 13] SessionFacade::openSessionLogon with user info has failed(Error en el transporte: Fallo en la comunicación.(hr=#0x80042a01)u201D
I'm using the standard port which is the 6400.
I hope your comments.
Thanks!

Hi,
Are you using any authentication ?
If you are using LDAP, then try this...
Symptom
Error logging onto Desktop Intelligence or Designer using LDAP authentication:
"(USR0013) [repo_proxy 13] SessionFacade::openSessionLogon with user info has failed (The LDAP authentication could not log you on.) Verify your logon information. If your account is under a different domain as o=u2026, please enter your dn (hr=#0x80042a01)."
Reproducing the Issue
Configure LDAP authentication
Error appears from a client computer running Desktop Intelligence or Designer
Logon to Desktop Intelligence or Designer on the server works
Cause
LDAP authentication from the client connects directly to the LDAP directory without passing the CMS
The server has been configured on the firewall, but not the client computer
Resolution
Configure the firewall for the client machines to pass, so that they can reach the LDAP directory

RV110W drops PPTP connections from a Windows client (MS CHAP v2 and MPPE)

This might be a tough problem to diagnose. I am trying to setup an RV100W for an office gateway with VPN access using PPTP. The office is located in another state, so I'm trying to do a "dry run" from home by setting up the RV110W on the local network. That is, my home network is 192.168.0.0 and I have assigned the RV110W a static IP address of 192.168.0.120 on its WAN side and a DHCP NAT internal network of 192.168.1.0. Its LAN IP is 192.168.1.2 (because of legacy limitations, the 192.168.1.1 address will be reserved for another host on the actual office network) and I set up the PPTP server on 192.168.1.3 and clients in the 192.168.1.20 to 24 range. I have enabled MPPE encryption and NetBIOS over VPN (rather important to have).
At first, I couldn't login at all. I had an underscore (_) in the user names (of which I have setup all five) and after I changed that, I was able to connect from a Windows 7 x64 host on the home LAN (192.168.0.132). I don't know if that was the problem as I got disconnected and reconnecting was a hit-or-miss - sometimes it would work, sometimes - it wouldn't. Below is the log from the session, showing the reasons for the disconnection. When I try to connect and it gets rejected, otherwise, the reason is the same: protocol not available.
But, first - here's the kicker. I had the exact same experience earlier with a DD-WRT router. I thought the problem lied with the amateurish firmware and that's why I decided to get the Cisco, but it seems like this might not be the problem, after all. Here is that discussion for full details: http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=149951&highlight= (to see all of the attached images and logs, you'll need an account). Briefly, with the same setup, I can establish a stable VPN connection from four Windows XP clients and one Windows 7 client, but I get the problems with two other Windows 7 clients. The Win7 clients that give me trouble can connect just fine to other PPTP VPN servers (with the built-in Microsoft PPTP client) and all three Win7 machines are clones of each other (only the hardware is different). No software firewalls, anti-virus/malware, user-permission limitations (e.g., UAC), or anything that could hamper the connections, are present on either machine.
I don't see how the fact that the RV110W is on a LAN and not exposed to the Internet on its WAN side could cause any trouble, but even then - why some clients work fine and others - not? I would appreciate any help with this issue.
Kamen
This is the log from the session, showing the connection of the VPN client and then, not two minutes later, the disconnection.
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.info pptpd[4582]: CTRL: Client 192.168.0.132 control connection started
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.info pptpd[4582]: CTRL: Starting call (launching pppd, opening GRE)
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: pppd 2.4.5 started by (unknown), uid 0
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: using channel 2
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.info pppd[4583]: Using interface ppp0
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/0
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.warning pppd[4583]: Warning - secret file /tmp/ppp/pap-secrets has world and/or group access
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <auth chap MS-v2> <magic 0x4269dad6>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 <mru 1400> <magic 0x5eec49d5> <pcomp> <accomp> <callback CBCP>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x0 <pcomp> <accomp> <callback CBCP>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <auth chap MS-v2> <magic 0x4269dad6>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1400> <magic 0x5eec49d5>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1400> <magic 0x5eec49d5>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0x4269dad6]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [CHAP Challenge id=0xfb <454ee20916a665999fdaa66778e1c4c5>, name = \"RV110W\"]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP Ident id=0x2 magic=0x5eec49d5 \"MSRASV5.20\"]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP Ident id=0x3 magic=0x5eec49d5 \"MSRAS-0-SOFTWAREONE64\"]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP Ident id=0x4 magic=0x5eec49d5 \"H\\37777777772\\37777777612\\37777777633F\\177\\37777777752J\\37777777640[\\377777776451\\37777777610\\\\Ob\"]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0x5eec49d5]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [CHAP Response id=0xfb <2aeb8dac876cbec7c23036952cfc270c00000000000000006f4cafa17228047ac82f26e47ae69eda8fe8650d5866e44b00>, name = \"sakor001\"]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.warning pppd[4583]: Warning - secret file /tmp/ppp/chap-secrets has world and/or group access
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [CHAP Success id=0xfb \"S=ACBA0BE9B8A98DDB757B234A1C69E9508DE169DE M=Access granted\"]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-up started (pid 4587)
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mppe +H -M +S +L -D -C>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-up finished (pid 4587), status = 0x16
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x5 <mppe +H -M +S -L -D -C>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [CCP ConfAck id=0x5 <mppe +H -M +S -L -D -C>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x6 <addr 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns1 0.0.0.0> <ms-wins 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns2 0.0.0.0> <ms-wins 0.0.0.0>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [IPCP TermAck id=0x6]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x1 <mppe +H -M +S -L -D -C>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mppe +H -M +S -L -D -C>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [CCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mppe +H -M +S -L -D -C>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: MPPE 128-bit stateless compression enabled
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr 192.168.1.3>]
2012-02-22 21:44:40 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 <addr 192.168.1.3>]
2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x7 <addr 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns1 0.0.0.0> <ms-wins 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns2 0.0.0.0> <ms-wins 0.0.0.0>]
2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [IPCP ConfRej id=0x7 <ms-wins 0.0.0.0> <ms-wins 0.0.0.0>]
2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x8 <addr 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns1 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns2 0.0.0.0>]
2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [IPCP ConfNak id=0x8 <addr 192.168.1.20> <ms-dns1 216.165.129.157> <ms-dns2 216.170.153.146>]
2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x9 <addr 192.168.1.20> <ms-dns1 216.165.129.157> <ms-dns2 216.170.153.146>]
2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x9 <addr 192.168.1.20> <ms-dns1 216.165.129.157> <ms-dns2 216.170.153.146>]
2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: local IP address 192.168.1.3
2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: remote IP address 192.168.1.20
2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-up started (pid 4661)
2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-up finished (pid 4661), status = 0x0
2012-02-22 21:44:42 RV110W user.debug syslog: Nbsrelay start (pid= 4678)
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: Modem hangup
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-down started (pid 4858)
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.info pppd[4583]: Connect time 1.5 minutes.
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.info pppd[4583]: Sent 10404 bytes, received 17264 bytes.
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-down started (pid 4861)
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.err pppd[4583]: MPPE disabled
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 \"MPPE disabled\"]
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[4583]: Connection terminated.
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-down finished (pid 4858), status = 0x16
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Waiting for 1 child processes...
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: script /tmp/ppp/ip-down, pid 4861
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[4583]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-down finished (pid 4861), status = 0x0
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.info pppd[4583]: Exit.
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.err pptpd[4582]: GRE: read(fd=11,buffer=449be4,len=8260) from network failed: status = -1 error = Protocol not available
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.err pptpd[4582]: CTRL: GRE read or PTY write failed (gre,pty)=(11,10)
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.debug pptpd[4582]: CTRL: Reaping child PPP[4583]
2012-02-22 21:46:10 RV110W daemon.info pptpd[4582]: CTRL: Client 192.168.0.132 control connection finished

Update: things are getting even weirder. In short - it seems to be working now (on the next day) without anything changing. First thing I did was just try another desperate tweak - I disabled the LCP extensions on the Windows client, which I've done before. It connected and stayed that way. Then, I reverted that setting back to exactly how it was before and connected again - no problems: it stayed connected for an hour (before I disconnected so I can connect to the real VPN), I could access a test-PC on the private network (a single machine just for the test) and do different tasks (resolve host names, browse UNC paths, copy files, Remote Desktop to it, etc.)
I hate it when things happen, for which there is no explanation. I couldn't be confident sending this to the main office to replace the existing router (hardware) and VPN server (implemented in software on a Windows 2003 server). Any thoughts?
Kamen
P.S. I'm attaching the logs from the successful session in case someone wants to compare them, but they seems quite identical (some different ConfAck / ConfNak sequences, but that doesn't seem to make much difference).
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.info pptpd[944]: CTRL: Client 192.168.0.132 control connection started
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.info pptpd[944]: CTRL: Starting call (launching pppd, opening GRE)
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: pppd 2.4.5 started by (unknown), uid 0
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: using channel 5
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.info pppd[946]: Using interface ppp0
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/0
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.warning pppd[946]: Warning - secret file /tmp/ppp/pap-secrets has world and/or group access
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x0 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0x11372b0b]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [CHAP Challenge id=0x66 <74f93b7b6de315aaaac930f984c219e4>, name = \"RV110W\"]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP Ident id=0x2 magic=0x67c80cba \"MSRASV5.20\"]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP Ident id=0x3 magic=0x67c80cba \"MSRAS-0-SOFTWAREONE64\"]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP Ident id=0x4 magic=0x67c80cba \"
\\37777777675\\027\\37777777665\\004\\37777777635\\37777777677@H\\37777777633~\\37777777775\\021\\tFQ(\
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0x67c80cba]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [CHAP Response id=0x66 <2f0330cb61ba1c8e29324410e0df24d3000000000000000025d1ef07d4cd82beaa93fe36ccc1e863b2652087eb02c39400>, name = \"sakor001\"]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.warning pppd[946]: Warning - secret file /tmp/ppp/chap-secrets has world and/or group access
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [CHAP Success id=0x66 \"S=9A5FB4C8B7C633FD6DEB868E150D0511BD93E0B4 M=Access granted\"]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-up started (pid 949)
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-up finished (pid 949), status = 0x16
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x5 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [CCP ConfNak id=0x5 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x6 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [IPCP TermAck id=0x6]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x1 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x2 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x7 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [CCP ConfAck id=0x7 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [CCP ConfAck id=0x2 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: MPPE 128-bit stateless compression enabled
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:26 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x8 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [IPCP ConfRej id=0x8 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x9 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [IPCP ConfNak id=0x9 ]
2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0xa ]
2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0xa ]
2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: local IP address 192.168.1.3
2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: remote IP address 192.168.1.20
2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-up started (pid 1028)
2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-up finished (pid 1028), status = 0x0
2012-02-23 10:01:28 RV110W user.debug syslog: Nbsrelay start (pid= 1040)
2012-02-23 10:17:56 RV110W daemon.err pptpd[944]: GRE: Bad checksum from pppd.
2012-02-23 10:31:51 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd[807]: received INFORM from 00:13:46:E6:D3:FA
2012-02-23 10:48:20 RV110W daemon.info httpd[376]: Administrator session timeout.
2012-02-23 10:48:27 RV110W daemon.info httpd[376]: Administrator logined from 192.168.0.132
2012-02-23 10:52:50 RV110W daemon.info udhcpd[807]: received INFORM from 00:26:F2:B7:49:42
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0xb \"g\\37777777710\\014\\37777777672\\000<
\\37777777715t\\000\\000\\000\\000\
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.info pppd[946]: LCP terminated by peer (gM-H^LM-:^@
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-down started (pid 6011)
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.info pppd[946]: Connect time 57.4 minutes.
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.info pppd[946]: Sent 272072987 bytes, received 6264878 bytes.
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-down started (pid 6015)
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: sent [LCP TermAck id=0xb]
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/auth-down finished (pid 6011), status = 0x16
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: Modem hangup
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.notice pppd[946]: Connection terminated.
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Waiting for 1 child processes...
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: script /tmp/ppp/ip-down, pid 6015
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pppd[946]: Script /tmp/ppp/ip-down finished (pid 6015), status = 0x0
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.info pppd[946]: Exit.
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.debug pptpd[944]: CTRL: Reaping child PPP[946]
2012-02-23 10:58:49 RV110W daemon.info pptpd[944]: CTRL: Client 192.168.0.132 control connection finished

Network Path Error from Windows Clients

Hi everyone,
I have a problem that's been puzzling me. I used to be able to connect to my Mac servers as well as Mac clients with Windows sharing enabled from PCs at my work. I can't recall exactly when it stopped working, but it has. Whenever I try connecting to a Mac from a Windows PC, all I get is the error "The network path \\"server"\"share" could not be found". Here's the scenario:
- Tried connecting to Tiger Server (10.4.2), Tiger client (10.4.4) and Panther Server (10.3.9)
- Neither Windows 2000 SP4 or XP SP2 work (I know about the issues with XP SP2)
- Systems are on the same IP subnet
- All have the same Windows workgroup name
- I've stopped and restarted Windows services, and Windows sharing on Tiger client
- Share points on both servers are configured for SMB
- Tried IP and host name
- Works fine connecting from a Mac using "smb://server" in the Connect To dialog
- I'm able to connect via FTP from the PC
Any ideas are appreciated!
iMacG5, iMac G4, iBook G3 900mhz, 1st gen iPod, iPod Nano Mac OS X (10.4.4)

Have you tried connecting to the share by IP address? try start, run,
\\xxx.xxx.x.xx\
The problem I am having is similar. 10.4.3 server windows shares work for a while, then it stops broadcasting out of the blue. We can still make IP connects to the server, but cannot using the smb name.
Gonna call support today and see what I can find out on my issue. If I find some resolve I will try to post the solution if I get time.
Matthew

Distorted fonts in (jre+Linux) Client but ok in (jre+Windows) client

We are doing the feasibility for using linux desktops in our company.
In Linux desktop clinents, the Oracle AS forms are shown in distorted fonts and lot of alignment issues. Whereas, Windows client shows the alignment perfectly.
Any body experienced the same issue ?
regards,
Rajkiran.

See this documentation http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/intl/fontconfig.html for details.
The JDK also uses a system property to set the font paths but I don't have it handy...
--olaf

Cisco Jabber for Windows Client SDK

Is there an SDK for Cisco Jabber for Windows client? I could only find the Web SDK. Are there no other SDKs that would let me control features of the Jabber Windows Client?

And in order to avoid TAPI limitation, they say they have started using Jabber which controls all phone functionalities through an Application User connected to the Call Manager.
Assuming they are referring to the normal Jabber for Windows/Mac/iOS/Android applications then this is wrong. Jabber - the client, not the IM&P servers which are part of the CUCM cluster (if you're familiar with Lync consider CUCM+IM&P servers a Front End Pool) - do not use an Application User at all. When a user starts Jabber, assuming SAML SSO is off, they supply an email address. This is used to find the servers via DNS SRV records, or the Mobile and Remote Access Expressway (roughly analogous to a Lync Edge pool) to tunnel through the firewall. After the email address they are prompted for their End User username and password. This is then used to access several APIs on the server, namely the User Data Service to discover what the user has. This would include what the user has configured/available to them. After this is done the Jabber client does one of three things with respect to phone functionality:
If the user has no phone devices provisioned for them - physical or software - it becomes an IM&P client only.
If the user has a software phone phone provisioned, it registers as that using SIP. In this way Jabber is the actual phone. This is called a CSF device for Jabber Windows/OS X.
If the user has a desk phone assigned to their End User account AND administrative policy is to default to desk phone control, it registers to CTI Manager on the CUCM server to control the user's physical phone.
A user can toggle between option two and three, if appropriately provisioned, but cannot have both simultaneously. In other words, Jabber is either controlling a physical phone over CTI or is a phone itself using SIP. The difference is where the audio/video media is sent from/to.
All of this happens using that human's End User credentials.
Now, if you wanted to have a server control the user's phone - either a physical one or Jabber - you would use the TSP as an interface to CTI Manager on the CUCM server and receive real-time events (e.g. the user went off-hook, the phone is ringing with this caller ID, etc.) and issue commands to that phone (e.g. make a call to X). This is done using an Application User account because the server would need to do this for multiple users simultaneously. If you also use the Super Provider concept, the CUCM administrator doesn't have to take the extra step of associating every phone to your Application User manually. Instead, you can simply issue CTI subscriptions to see any/all device activity you want.
This is all assuming you wanted to do the integration server-side to avoid having to update the Cisco TSP application on every user PC (which also limits your WPF application to machines capable of running the TSP) every time the CUCM administrator patches the servers. If you don't care about that, then you can do this all client-side on the user's PC, and have them supply their End User credentials.
Of course, you could also reconsider the Jabber SDK and just embed the make/receive call functionality directly into your application instead.

Disconnects (Windows clients - lots are XP SP2)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for