Discount should not be considered during F110

Dear All,
We have the Scenario as below....
Payment Terms : 10 days , 2 % Discount
Base Line Date : 03/18/2015
Net Due Date : 03/28/2015
Payment Run : 03/31/2015
So as payment run date ( 03/31/2015 ) is already past due date (03/28/2015 ), why system still taking out the discount during payment run ?
Please suggest whether am I missing any other settings ?
Thanks,
Rk

HI Rama,
First make the payment term
10 days , 2 % Discount
11 days 0%
Why system still taking out the discount during payment run ? The below fields can also influence your setting to get similar results.
1. tolerance days for payables.
2.Max cash discount allowed.
3.Payment per due date
Regards,
Sam

Similar Messages

Pharma: shelf life with remaining 4 months should not be considered for planning

Hi,
Implementation in Pharma : FG Shelf life with remaining 4 months should not be considered for FG planning.
How to exclude this stock while planning for FG. FG planning is Make to stock.
BR
Subbu.

Hi,
Thanks to Caetano, Kumar & Mani..
We have achieved this with below with customized program....
Exclude those batches from MRP run whose difference between the (expiration date &
current date ) is less than or equal to its procurement time mention in MRP-2
view of material master.
Before running MRP, one need to execute the program with following option:
Input data will be plant, material type or list of material:
   System should execute following logic:
1) In a plant list all material with given material type
2) Execute the BAPI for find out the characteristic value of EXB_MRP from class
type 001of material class (BAPI_OBJCL_GETDETAIL_KEY)
3) If EXB_MRP = Y , then list out all such material.
4) For such a material identity those batches which are available in stock other
than ‘9999’
5) All such batches characteristic of shelf life expiry date need to be derived
from BAPI
6) Calculate ( Expiry Date - Today’s Date)
= Difference
PLIFZ ), batch of
the material will be transferred to the 9999 storage location which will be
excluded from MRP run.
PLIFZ ), batch of the material will be transferred
to the 9999 storage location which will be excluded from MRP run.
   7) Run the MRP on materials
   8) Transfer posting from 9999 storage location to original storage location :
Selection criteria
   On execution transfer the material back to required storage location.
BR
Subbu.

RESERVED QUANTITY'S SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR TRANSFER POSTINGS

Dear Gurus,
Reserved quantity's should not be considered for Transfer postings to subcontractor or Stock transfers.
Example: Material XYZ Total Stock = 1200 nos.

as per standard SAP reservation quantity will not stop the goods issue. resevation has no control on stock issue.
Try with abap development.

RESERVATION QUANTITY SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR TRANSFER POSTINGS

Dear Gurus,
Reservation Quantity should not be considered for Stock Transfers or Transfer postings to Sub contractor.
movement type : 541 & 641
Example : Total Stock = 1200 nos. Reserved stock for production order = 1000 nos.
Currently our system allows stock transfers/transfer postings for reserved quantity also.
But we want the reserved quantity to be blocked and only free stock should be allowed for transfer postings.
(i.e 1200 - 1000 = 200 nos . Only 200 nos should be allowed for transfer postings)
Please suggest.

as per standard SAP reservation quantity will not stop the goods issue. resevation has no control on stock issue.
Try with abap development.

How to prevent for a particular org manually created IR/ISO should not be considered for Constrained EDD plans

We have a situation that around IRs with ~500 parts which manually created in Org A and ISO Created in Org B and ISO picked as well. But due to some reasons, shipment will get delay for 1 month and till that time plan should not be considered this IR' as supply in Org A.
Currently our Constrained EDD plan is considering this IR quantities as supply for the Org A demands and not generating any Planned orders. Seems we don't option to firm IRs by changing the need by date after 1 month. Also its not respect the need by date of IR and its getting reschedule in action and pegged to the current Demand in Org A. Please advise if you have any thoughts.

We have a situation that around IRs with ~500 parts which manually created in Org A and ISO Created in Org B and ISO picked as well. But due to some reasons, shipment will get delay for 1 month and till that time plan should not be considered this IR' as supply in Org A.
Currently our Constrained EDD plan is considering this IR quantities as supply for the Org A demands and not generating any Planned orders. Seems we don't option to firm IRs by changing the need by date after 1 month. Also its not respect the need by date of IR and its getting reschedule in action and pegged to the current Demand in Org A. Please advise if you have any thoughts.

Freight should not get reversed during credit memo

Hi Experts,
I Have a purchase order with planned delivery costs for e.g. say freight of some value and Goods receipt is posted and invoice is posted with freight. But our customer needs that when they perform the credit memo freight should not be reversed. How to perform this
Regards
Badri

HI Badri
can create credit memo without freight cost
1) in MIRO choose Cedit memo
2) in indicator choose only goods/service items
(if want to rasise credit memo for both material cost and freight need to choose goods/service items + planned delivery cost)
3) then both material cost and freight cost will display, here need to deselect freight cost.
4) now post. credit memo would have posted for only material cost.
Regards
karan

Delivery Note Number should not repeat again during MIGO

Hi Friends,
My client has a requirement to validate the Delivery note filed in the MIGO screen, i.e., the system should allow the user to enter a delivery note number once entered already during goods movement through MIGO. Is there any way that this can be done?
Regards
Guru Prasad

Thanks for the reply Ganesh.
Explaination of the requirement:
During goods receipt the user is supposed to enter the delivery challan number of the vendor in the filed "Delivery Note" in MIGO header. If the user by mistake types the same delivery note number again while posting goods reciept for the same vendor in future, the system should throw an error. If there is any user exit or if it can be done through some development kindly suggest the procedure for the same.
I also checked for the standard system messages, but couldn't find any.
Rgds
Guru Prasad

Btach split should not be considered in billing

Hi all,
1).I've created a sales order for 20 kgs.
2). Created delivery 10 kgs from one batch and 10 kg from another batch
3). i need to create invoice in a single line for 20 KGs without considering the batch split.
In vov7 for the item category Tan the billing relevance ahs been maintained as A
In vtfl from delivery to billing , for item category tan billing quantity is empty.
What changes should i make to getting creatde the invoice in single for total 20 Kgs. I shouldn't get O for batch split items in invoice.
Please advise.

Dear DV,
In vtfl from delivery to billing , for item category tan billing quantity is empty.
Maintain Billing quantity field as G -Cumulative batch quantity minus invoiced quantity or H-Cumul.batch quantity then try.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

GDM should not be running during boot?

I have been trying to boot faster and therefore dropped GDM and instead used SLIM, but my bootchart still says that GDM starts even though I have uninstalled it. Why is it running? Should I remove it? How to remove it?
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3421/330 … a2_o_d.png

GDM is not specified in my GDM array:
DAEMONS=(@preload syslog-ng netfs @cpufreq @hal @fnfxd !crond @wicd @smbnetfs)
And I have specified slim in my inittab:
# /etc/inittab
# Runlevels:
# 0 Halt
# 1(S) Single-user
# 2 Not used
# 3 Multi-user
# 4 Not used
# 5 X11
# 6 Reboot
## Only one of the following two lines can be uncommented!
# Boot to console
#id:3:initdefault:
# Boot to X11
id:5:initdefault:
rc::sysinit:/etc/rc.sysinit
rs:S1:once:/etc/rc.single
rm:2345:once:/etc/rc.multi
rh:06:once:/etc/rc.shutdown
su:S:once:/sbin/sulogin -p
# -8 options fixes umlauts problem on login
c1:2345:respawn:/sbin/agetty -8 38400 vc/1 linux
c2:2345:respawn:/sbin/agetty -8 38400 vc/2 linux
c3:2345:respawn:/sbin/agetty -8 38400 vc/3 linux
ca::ctrlaltdel:/sbin/shutdown -t3 -r now
# Example lines for starting a login manager
#x:5:respawn:/usr/bin/xdm -nodaemon
#x:5:respawn:/usr/sbin/gdm -nodaemon
#x:5:respawn:/usr/bin/kdm -nodaemon
x:5:respawn:/usr/bin/slim >& /dev/null
# End of file
So I don't know why it is still running.

[svn] 2472: remove flex4. swc - should not have been checked in as it gets produced during the compile

Revision: 2472
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-07-14 13:21:25 -0700 (Mon, 14 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
remove flex4.swc - should not have been checked in as it gets produced during the compile
remove StyleProperty.vm - it is no longer used
Removed Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/libs/flex4.swc
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/as3/StyleProperty.vm

My daughter has had her Razr for about 9 months now. About two weeks ago she picked up her phone in the morning on her way to school when she noticed two cracks, both starting at the camera lens. One goes completely to the bottom and the other goes sharply to the side. She has never dropped it and me and my husband went over it with a fine tooth comb. We looked under a magnifying glass and could no find any reason for the glass to crack. Not one ding, scratch or bang. Our daughter really takes good care of her stuff, but we still wanted to make sure before we sent it in for repairs. Well we did and we got a reply from Motorola with a picture of the cracks saying this was customer abuse and that it is not covered under warranty. Even though they did not find any physical damage to back it up. Well I e-mailed them back and told them I did a little research and found pages of people having the same problems. Well I did not hear from them until I received a notice from Fed Ex that they were sending the phone back. NOT FIXED!!! I went to look up why and guess what there is no case open any more for the phone. It has been wiped clean. I put in the RMA # it comes back not found, I put in the ID #, the SN# and all comes back not found. Yet a day earlier all the info was there. I know there is a lot more people like me and all of you, but they just don't want to be bothered so they pay to have it fix, just to have it do it again. Unless they have found the problem and only fixing it on a customer pay only set up. I am furious and will not be recommending this phone to anyone. And to think I was considering this phone for my next up grade! NOT!!!!

Production orders not to be considered during MRP run

Dear SAPeers,
i want to know how to ensure that open production orders are not considered during the MRP run.
the following is the scenario.
PIR for march after MRP run creates a planned order. this planned order is converted to production order. now this production order is processed but not completely confirmed and TECOed after a certain quantity has been produced.
now we delete the old PIR and create a new PIR in the next month. now we revoke the TECO status of the production order and run MRP. I want to know how to avoid MRP from considering the open production order and create planned order for the complete PIR quantity.
Thanks and Regards
Srinivasan

Srini,
what i am worried is shortfall of raw materials in case they were to open the production order in the current month after the planning has been done. how do we allocate raw materials for both the plan as well as the open production order?
Okay, you presumably had RM available for all of your production orders (and those RM were balanced by the reservations from the production orders). Now, you TECO the production order. In effect, any un-issued RM are now released and freely available for other orders/planned orders. Now you plan the following month. Those RM that were freed can and will be used for the new plan. Odd business process, but OK. Now, you re-open the production orders, and, yes, you will have a shortage unless you run RM MRP again. This is, ah, inconsistent with any business process I have ever seen.
The question that jumps to mind is, "Why re-open the old production orders at all? Alternatively, why were they TECOd in the first place?" If one knows that he intends to complete an order in production, one does not normally TECO the order, and then later reverse the TECO.
With respect to my name, I must unfortunately keep a low profile. Ever since I escaped from the mental institution, the thought-police have been hunting for me. I do not wish to be the recipient of any further electroshock 'treatments'.
Rgds,
DB49

Is there a possibility should not consider available quantity at time of MR

Sir,
Is there a possibility should not consider available quantity at time of MRP planning?
Example:
Available stock: 100
Planning stock: 100 (MD61)
Schedule line to be generate: 100 Qty (Exclude the available quantity at time of MRP planning)
regards,
sampath

Dear Sampath/Raj,
1) Move the stock to particular storage location for which you don't want to be consider by MRP
2) Now go to OMIR t-code, input value as 1 for that particular storage location
3) Go to MMSC, input value as 1 for that particular storage location
4) Go to MRP - 4 view Down you can find field Storage location input value as 1
5) Now run MRP, system will not consider stock of that particular storage location
Regards
Madhu

Service areas not considered during autom. item scheduling

Hello,
we've currently trying to activate the automatic scheduling of service orders in our CRM 5.0 SP4 system. The demands (service order items) should be assigned to resources according the ZIP code of the service recipient.
I made the settings for building up service areas mentioned on help.sap.com
(http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/e6/0f2288993743198bf26a2191635525/frameset.htm AND
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/da/7d808043d244cf806dcf0d6e69381e/frameset.htm), however, it doesn't work yet.
In fact I don't understand yet how the resources are assigned to specific service areas. This is mentioned on the help pages, however, not described how it actually works.
Is this the only "missing link" - kindly tell me how to do this - or do I need to perform additional settings? The assignment itself works right now, however, not yet considering service areas.
I made a where-used analysis of the table where the service areas are maintained in, however, no hits.
Thanks & regards
Wolfgang

Hi Aziz,
I agreed with Mr.Ajay M reply ...add on to this "however i also faced this issue i.e.
"No planning Values but there are Actual Values - We can correct this issue by planning in KP06"
We faced the above issue- (we have added the new cost center in between & not planned in KP06- so while running KSS2 the same it has occured- so we have planned in KP06 & ran it done successfully...
As suggested by Mr. Ajay M considering of Fixed & var cost- in ML functionality will flow as system process.
Could you please try to maintain planning & run sure it will help as we also done the same.
Regd,
Khan.

Sales orders with expired dates should not consider in MRP

Hi,
My requirement is that when i m running MRP for sales order for which expiry date has already been lapsed or over.sysyem should not create any mrp elements(Planned order) for such Sales orders.
We have maintained one Z table which gives the validity period(Expiry date) for sales order according to their respective division.
if MRP running date lies after the date of expiry of sales order, system shoul not allow to run MRP for that sales order or it should pop some message while executing MRP run before saving it.
How we can achieve this?
Pls suggest.....
Rgds,
Yogesh Thorat..

Since as per standard, there is no concept called validity period for sale order and you are maintaining in a zee table, definitely your requirement has to be met with user exit or function module or some enhancements.
Perhaps, you can try with MRP Enhancements
a) LMDR2001 or
b) LMDZU001
to meet your requirement.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Exchage rate should not come during payment to the vendors

Hi Sap Experts,
My client have some different requirement,
At the time of MIRO system is picking the Exchange rate from OB08 table and converting to company code currency. When will make the payment to vendor, through company code currency system is picking exchange rate from OB08 table and it is showing exchange rate Gain/loss Account, which our client does not required.
At the time of payment to above vendor, system should picking only liability created value and should not show any exchange rate difference.
Thanks in advance
kareem

Hi,
If exchange rate is same at the time of invoice and payment then there will be no issue.
But when there is difference you have to show the Gain and loss in your account.
Otherwise how will you entry match.
Eg invoice 100 USD with exchange rate is 50 INR
When you are paying 100 USD exchange rate is 51 INR
Then entry will come as
Vendor A/c 5000 Dr
Loss Exhange rate 100 Dr
To Bank A/c 5100 Cr
If you don't show the loss how will you match the entry.
As you have to show what you have paid through bank which is not changeable

Discount should not be considered during F110

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for