Discoverer version compatability

I posted one message in general discussion on the same issue.
Still my doubts are not cleared and hope i will get a clear picture by the help of members in this forum.
In my company, we are implementing an ERP in Oracle 9i (9.2.0.1.0), D2k 6i.
It is still under implementation and customization. Now we want to use discoverer in some of our managers/ managements desktops for custom reports.
Which version of discoverer is compatable with Oracle 9i (9.2.0.1.0), D2k 6i and which version of discoverer I want to buy
Regards
Sumanlal

Hello,
Thx for your reply
My ERP is using Oracle 9i Database (version 9.2.0.1.0.1) and Forms 6i (Developer 2000) With IIS on Application Side
if i am buying Oracle application server Enterprise edition, Oracle says that I can use Forms, Reports, DISCOVERER, and Net Application.
Pls tell me weather Discoverer latest version which is coming part of Oracle AS enterprise edition can be used in my current platform?.
I heard that the Discoverer latest version which is coming part of Oracle AS enterprise edition needs an Install of Oracle 10g AS.
I want to use discoverer in my current platform with out any additional install of Oracle DB & AS
Is it possible?
pls reply
regards
suman

Similar Messages

Discoverer version compatable with 8.1.7

We are currently upgrading from 7.3 to 8.1.7, and I am wondering if the current version of Discoverer will still be compatable. What I am looking for is for someone to tell me what versions of Discoverer are compatable with 8.1.7 of the database or point me to a page on the Oracle web site.
Cheers

Pl open an SR with Support for this issue
Srini

Version compatibility of 10G Application Server 10.1.2.0.2 with JDK 1.5.

hi buddies,
I want to know that whether
10G Application Server 10.1.2.0.2 with JDK 1.5. is Version compatibility
pls do send ur replies if known to you.

Hi ,
As far as I know AS 10.1.2.0.2 is Not certified with JDK 1.5.
Please see below some links where you can double-check this
1. OC4J with JDK 1.5 JSP compilation error
2. http://docs.huihoo.com/oracle/docs/B14099_19/web.1012/b14011/chap1.htm
"Only the JDK 1.3.1 and JDK 1.4 compilers are supported and certified by OC4J. It is possible to specify an alternative compiler by adding a <java-compiler> element to the server.xml file, and this might provide a workaround for the "classes not in packages" issue, but no other compilers are certified or supported by Oracle for use with OC4J."
3. "Certified JDKs" from
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/ias/files/as_certification_r2_101202.html
BR,
Mihai

Version compatibility for installing WLS and ADR for ADF 11.1.2.0

Hi,
Can anyone pls let me know what versions of Weblogic server, Application Development Runtime (ADR) is required to install Oracle JDeveloper 11.1.2.0
B'coz currently I am trying to install Weblogic server, ADR and ADF separately and try to deploy and publish an application in ADF 11.1.2.0 verison.
I am trying this for the past 4 days, but still can't deploy an application successfully in ADF 11.1.2.0 version. Pls let me know the version compatibility.
Thanks,
Aparna

Hi John,
Even I saw the link that u had mentioned. From where can I install these ?
I had downloaded WLS 10.3.5 and ADR 11.1.1.5 separately. But from where do I install the patch ?? I didn't find a proper source to download.
Pls help.
Thanks,
Aparna

NWDI version compatibility

Hi,
Does anyone know if there are any version compatibility constraints developing Java WebDynpro applications on an NWDI (WAS6.40) for deployment on a WAS7.00 instance (e.g. JDK's)?
I've yet to find a general recommendation similar to that seen for SLD (i.e. keep in line with the highest WAS version on the estate) or any clear documentation on version compatibility across WAS stacks with respect to NWDI.
We have a highly complex landscape with multiple component/ product versions, and we'd prefer to have a singel central NWDI instance, but I'm not sure if this is practical and/ or possible.
Any pointers/ documentation/ comments gratefully received
Cheers
Neil

While I can't remember where I've seen it, SAP does recommend that the DI always be kept patched to the latest levels, regardless of what version your landscape (or pieces thereof ) is at.
So, as long as your DI is at patched to at least the same level as your most 'advanced' system, you should not have any problem. You should also match your Developer Studio to the same level as your target system to avoid using any plug-ins that offer features not offered by the eventual runtime system. Yes, the required libraries will be ok (as long as you configure the SLD and the associated track correctly), but the Developer Studio itself needs to be matched up.
Hope that makes sense.

Photoshop Extended version compatability

I have Photoshop CS3 Extended on both PC (Windows XP) and Mac (OS X Leopard). I'm able to upgrade the PC to CS5 Extended but not the Mac.
My questions are:
1 - Will Photoshop CS5 extended work on Windows XP?
2 - Are CS3 and CS5 backwards compatible - if I work on a document in PC CS5 will the Mac CS5 version be able to open it? I know there will be some things that would not translate backwards, such as Puppet Warp and some of the newer masking and layers features, but I'd still like to be able to work on more basic functions of masking, cloning, etc. on both computers.
Thanks for any help,
Marcy

Noel Car boni wrote:
For the most part, a document saved from Photoshop CS5 will be no problem to open in CS3. There's a "Maximize Compatibility" setting in Edit - Preferences - File Handling section that you'll want to set to "Always".
-Noel
My take is that the compatibility setting should be set based on the kind of work one does. I have it set to "Never". When you check this setting ON you tell Photoshop to save along with all your layers another entity, which is a flattened version of the image. This, makes every PSD file you save larger by a non trival amount.
So this setting should have no effect regarding Photoshop to Photoshop version compatibility. All Photoshop versions understand layers and do not need a flattened version. It's intended to maximize the compatibility between Photoshop and any other program that does not know about layers but reads PSD files. If you have many of your PSD files going to, for example, Lightroom or Premiere then set it to "Always". If not, you can set it to "Ask" or "Never" and save yourself a lot of storage space.
Paulo

Re: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Fortev30L2 on D

Dirk:
I ran into a similar problem. I added an other flag to my fcompile script and
it seems to be working fine, your mileage may vary. The flag was
-cflags "-oldcxx only"
Dwayne Kryger
"Haben, Dirk" <[email protected]> on 08/25/99 02:09:16 AM
To: "'Soapbox Forte Users'" <[email protected]>
cc: (bcc: Dwayne Kryger/SEH)
Subject: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Forte v30L2 on
Digital Unix 4 d and C++ version ???
G'day Folxs
Just installed Forte as a Simple Server on a Digital UNIX (v4.0d) box (being
a VMSbot it was much easier than I thought). We want to use it to interface
with an existing web client. The Forte part is to provide us a scalable
access path to Oracle DBs on the VMS machine; already running Forte.
I'm having trouble finding media that contains C++ v5.4.-006 for the Unix
box. Does anyone know of/has used higher versions of C++ without too much
drama? How about v5.7 or even v6.1? We will be using extensive C++
interfacing to existing web pages!
NB: The current web system client is compiled using EGCS 2.91.66.
TIA,
/[:-)irK
Dirk Haben, Perth WA
For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

Dirk:
I ran into a similar problem. I added an other flag to my fcompile script and
it seems to be working fine, your mileage may vary. The flag was
-cflags "-oldcxx only"
Dwayne Kryger
"Haben, Dirk" <[email protected]> on 08/25/99 02:09:16 AM
To: "'Soapbox Forte Users'" <[email protected]>
cc: (bcc: Dwayne Kryger/SEH)
Subject: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Forte v30L2 on
Digital Unix 4 d and C++ version ???
G'day Folxs
Just installed Forte as a Simple Server on a Digital UNIX (v4.0d) box (being
a VMSbot it was much easier than I thought). We want to use it to interface
with an existing web client. The Forte part is to provide us a scalable
access path to Oracle DBs on the VMS machine; already running Forte.
I'm having trouble finding media that contains C++ v5.4.-006 for the Unix
box. Does anyone know of/has used higher versions of C++ without too much
drama? How about v5.7 or even v6.1? We will be using extensive C++
interfacing to existing web pages!
NB: The current web system client is compiled using EGCS 2.91.66.
TIA,
/[:-)irK
Dirk Haben, Perth WA
For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

OracleBI Discoverer Version 10.1.2.55.26 hanging

i have the OracleBI Discoverer Version 10.1.2.55.26 and after enteriing the +Connect To , User name, Password and Database and press Go, it displays the next page Account Details: Select Responsibility and after press continue button , the white page is displaying for long time.
Can anybody help me

Hi
If this is in a production environment, personally, I would suggest raising an immediate SR with Oracle. That will be the quickest way to get this resolved.
Short term things to check are whether you are starting the services in the right order and whether the services are up and running.
It sounds like you have an infrastructure database in place so the right order for starting everything are:
1. Start the listener for the infrastructure database
2. Start the infrastructure database
3. Start the infrastructure tier
4. Start the database where the Discoverer EUL is located
5. Start the database where the data resides, if not the same as in step 4
6. Start the Discoverer middle tier instance
Steps 4 and 5 can actually be started at any point prior to actually connecting to Discoverer. I just show them in that position as that is where I do it in my instance.
If the above is right and working make sure that all of the Discoverer services are in fact up and running. You can do this as follows:
1. At the operating system log in as Oracle user
2. Go to home directory for middle tier
3. Go into OPMN/BIN folder
4. Type opmnctl status and press the Enter button
What services do you see alive?
Best wishes
Michael

WAP54G Version compatibility

I am trying to create a wireless bridge between a network with ip's 198.1.1.xxx (this network has the gateway) to a network with ip's 198.1.2.xxx - so that it can access the internet thru the gateway). Both AP's are WAP54G set to bridge mode. Both are configured identically except for the IP numbers. SSID broadcast disabled and security off. From everything I have read, I should be able to ping (example 4.2.2.2) from 198.1.2.xxx - but cannot. The only difference I can see it that one of the WAP54G's is version 2 and the other is Version 3. Both have firmware 3.0.4.
Question: Can anyone confirm that I can or cannot create a wireless bridge with differing versions of the same device?
As a plan B, I have on order a WET200. Should I have two on order to act as a matched pair as the WAP54G's had to be?
Thank you.
Craig

I work with psd, indd and illu/eps files. I've heard the weird argument that "cause of new features it's not possible to be version compatible, but that's down right silly. Text on top of an image should be readable in any version. Even with a copule of adjustment layers it should be no problems with version compatibility. That Adobe choose to lock and force is another story. I guess I will be sticking to my CS6 version in the years to come. I paid a lot of money for that Master Collection. I also corresponde files with many CS4 users on the client side.

Correct Discoverer version for EBS 11.5.10

Dear Members :
Could you please guide me the right Discoverer Version, the link to download from and configuration steps, in order to connect to EBS 11.5.10 (base) running on Linux ?
I am completely confused looking at so many views and my own failure with ver 4.1.37 (both admin & desktop), login error (same TNS setting I am using with so many applications to connect to database).
Do I need to check anything on apps server side - do appreciate it very much ?
Thanks.
Atanu

user11184124 wrote:
Hussein :
Thanks. I figured out the following in my Apps instance:
[1] Oracle Discoverer 4i Plus Release-4.1.48.08.00
Discoverer Model: 4.1.48.08.00
Discoverer Server: V4.1.48.08.00
End User Layer:V4.1.14.08.0.0.0 etc.
Could you please tell me now, which Discoverer Standalone (Admin/Desktop), should I go for ?
Regards
AtanuDisco 4.1 is the version that comes bundled with EBS 11.5.10. It is currently de-supported (http://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/2006/04/discoverer_4i_to_be_desupporte.html)
You can download 4.1.37 Admin/Desktop version from here (http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/discoverer/downloads/index-095113.html) and you will have to request Support to provide you the 4.1.48 patch which you will need to apply.
HTH
Srini

Patchset 10.1.2.2 and latest Discoverer version

Hi all, I have successfully installed Discoverer 10g 10.1.2.0.2 version from the ΟAS_Business_Intelligence_Pack_101202_(HP), but after a couple of days I discovered some bugs like the double '00' for totals and
On Metalink I found the Note:399843.1 (Upgrading Discoverer 10g (10.1.2.0.x) to Patchset 10.1.2.2) to fix this and other problems.
So...I have 3 questions:
1) Which is the latest Discoverer version actually available ? is the 10.1.2.2 ?
2) with this Patchset, can I upgrade Discoverer 10g to the latest version ?
3) Instead of installing this patchset, does exist a "business intelligence pack" from the latest Application Server 10g Release 3 (10.1.3.x) in order to install the latest Discoverer version ?
Thanks you all
Alex

Hi,
We had the same issue (discoverer displaying '00' instead of '0') along with couple more issues. We fixed them as below.
1. Install iAS patch 10.1.2.2 (Disco 10.1.2.54.25) on a development or test server.
This patch is on Metalink and does not require a password.
Patch 4960210 Oracle Application Server Products Family: Patchset
PLACEHOLDER BUG FOR AS/DS 10G R2 PATCH SET 2 10.1.2.2
2. Open a Service Request (SR) with Oracle Support to request the password for Discoverer Cumulative Patch III:
Patch 6155500, CUMULATIVE PATCH III: MLR ON TOP OF 10.1.2.2 FOR MLR 6129303 + NEW BUG FIXES
3. Install patches as described in the patch readme.txt files.
4. Retest Viewer and workbook identifier to ensure errors no longer occur and workbook identifier is unchanged.
5. Promote patches to your production environment once bug fix is confirmed.
Hope this Helps!
Yogini

Discoverer Version Difference

Hi
We have two OAS discoverer installations. I installed New one using OAS 10.1.2.0.2.
When we check BI Discoverer version after logging to Discoverer Plus new installation shows 9.0.4.But the old one shows 10.1.2.1.
Only the first line is the difference all others are same.Why is the difference?
OLD Instance:
OracleBI Discoverer 10g (10.1.2.1)
Oracle Business Intelligence Discoverer Plus 10g (10.1.2.48.18)
Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
Discoverer Server - 10.1.2.48.18
End User Layer - 5.1.1.0.0.0
End User Layer Library - 10.1.2.48.18
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - 64bi
New Instance:
OracleBI Discoverer 10g (9.0.4.00.00)
Oracle Business Intelligence Discoverer Plus 10g (10.1.2.48.18)
Discoverer Model - 10.1.2.48.18
Discoverer Server - 10.1.2.48.18
End User Layer - 5.1.1.0.0.0
End User Layer Library - 10.1.2.48.18
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - 64bi
Where is this version stored-- First line..
Thanks
Edited by: user11159690 on Jul 16, 2009 2:52 PM

The best way to check the discoverer version is to go to $ORACLE_HOME/bin and run the
command:
strings -a dis51ws | grep "Discoverer Version:"
Thanks,
Sutirtha

RoboHelp Version Compatibility

Hello everybody from Greece,
I want to ask about version compatibility. I've got RoboHelp
HTML 5.0.2 and my client has RoboHelp HTML 3.1. He asks if I can
compile his project, but I wnt to know if he will be able to work
with the project that I will work with in version 5.0.2.
Is there a way to save the project to an older version?
Is there a compatibility problem in general?
Is there going to be a problem if I compile the project in
the newer version? (Will he see any differences?)
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Tansou and υποδοχή,
You should be able to open up the X3.1 in X5.02 without a
problem. X5 will preserve all the feature used in X3.1. Are you
compiling HTML Help? My guess is that you won't see any difference
in the output when you compile.
However, the problem comes when you try and do this the other
way around. Robohelp is not backward compatible. So you won't be
able to pass a modified project back to your client. Rick the
robowizard has a few tricks to help with backward compatibility if
you don't mind going under the hood. However, not sure if this
works with X3.1 jumping to X3.1.
What type of output are you generating?
Hope that helps
Craig

Adobe Reader version compatability

I have a PDF that is compatible with Adobe reader 11.0.2 and I have version 11.0.5 currently installed. Version 11.0.5 won't open the PDF. How can I open this PDF? Do I need to specifically download version 11.0.2?
Thanks for any help!

I can open Reader on its own. I am trying to download a grant application and when I click on the link that is supposed to open it through Reader it says that Reader is not compatible and that I need to install the latest version of the PDF viewer. When I click on the link to install the latest version it send me to the Reader installation. I have installed and tried reinstalling Reader and it hasn't helped. In the instructions for the grant it only talks about compatability for versions up to 11.0.2 that's why I wasn't sure if maybe the problem is because I have 11.0.5.

Adobe AIR version compatibility

Hi,
I am trying to run my application built in Flex Builder 3 and
compatibility with Adobe AIR beta 3 on Adobe AIR 1.0 (i.e. latest
version 1.0.7.4880); but its not working. It gives "This
application requires a version of Adobe AIR which is no longer
supported. Please contact the application author for an updated
version."
So is there any solution for this, that i can run my Adobe
AIR beta 3 compatible application on Adobe AIR 1.0 (i.e.
1.0.7.4880)?
Thanks,
vijayataV

No, AIR applications that target Beta 3 can only be run on
Beta 3. To target the 1.0 release, you must migrate your
application. In most cases, this only requires changing the
namespace in the application descriptor to refer to 1.0.
Oliver Goldman | Adobe AIR Engineering

Discoverer version compatability

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for