Disk size requirement

Hello,
I'm planning the installation of an SDS. I don't find any reference to the disk size requirements in the documentation. Is the any recommendation ?
We will be managing Solaris Sparc 8,9, 10 as well as Soalris X64 and Linux RHES 3 and 4. Around 100 servers for the whole farm.
Could someone point me to some recommendation ?
Best regards

For installing an SDS, here is the recommendation:
Disk Space Requirements:     
Installation: 512 MB minimum free in the file system that serves /usr/local
Software Components: 500 MB minimum
SWAP: 500 MB minimum
For more information, see:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/coll/1561.1

Similar Messages

  • Tempdb- Disk size Requirement for Tempdb Database?

    Working on new project that have fresh windows and SQl  Server Install on physical machine. 
    Like to know what should be the disk size to keep for  tempdb Intially? like 10Gb or 20GB? It will be on separate Drive .
    Also like to know what should be ideal drive size to keep for Data  and Log drive? They both will be on separate drive also.
    any other configuration best practices  ?
    Thank you
    Please Mark As Answer if it is helpful. \\Aim To Inspire Rather to Teach A.Shah

    Hi,
    Size of the tempdb depends on various factors.
    Bulkload operation
    general query expressions
    dbcc checks
    indexes
    LOB Variables and parameters and many more.
    As others suggested,monitoring is the best way.Try the below in test environments.
    Set autogrow on for tempdb.
    Execute individual queries or workload trace files and monitor tempdb space use.
    Execute index maintenance operations, such as rebuilding indexes and monitor tempdb space.
    Use the space-use values from the previous steps to predict your total workload usage; adjust this value for projected concurrent activity, and then set the size oftempdb accordingly.
    Refer the below link for optimization.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175527(v=sql.105).aspx
    Best Regards, Arun http://whynotsql.blogspot.com/

  • Qfs minimum partition/disk size requirement

    I just want to know the minimal requirement of the disk/partition size to create qfs file system?
    As qfs separates metadata devices from data devices, what is the minimum size for both to create qfs?
    There could be some determination way like creating shortest partitions (in KB’s?) and use them to create qfs.
    Please revert with some pointers.
    -r_p_w

    It sounds like people are having different experiences with this issue, here's mine:
    When trying to resize partitions without reformatting first, dragging the partition corners worked but didn't allow me to make the second partition smaller than 1/10th the size of the drive. If I used the "size" field to change the second partition, it would reduce, but the first (main) partition would not fill up the rest of the space. If I subsequently tried to change the size of the main partition using either the "size" field or the drag method, it would automatically revert to its previous size.
    I decided to go ahead and reformat the drive, after which I was able to create two partitions and resize them freely. I still found that when reducing the size of the second volume, the first did not resize to fill the drive automatically. However, this time I was able to drag the corner of the first volume, increasing its size to fill the drive. Thanks again for your help.

  • Enterprise Features: Reduced Disk Size Requirements (Provisioning)

    Hello,
    as an Enterprise-Admin, I am really glad to hear that MS wants to do more for their Enterprise Customers.
    One thing that drives admins into madness, is the fact, that since Vista/W7, the HDD blows up like stupid.
    Even a fresh installation, after all the patches are installed, has around 30GB of (actual) Size.
    If you use provisioned machines, thats a real pain and makes my network cry
    With XP (RIP) that was like 5 GB. 
    I do understand that WINSXS is required to prevent the DLL-Hell, but is it really required to store all the DLLs from all those Patches that MS provides? I mean, we're talking of a freshly installed OS, that already doesn't know how to handle its own files.
    Is MS doing somthing, so an admin can reduce the size of the MasterImage?

    Hi Benjamin.G,
    From Windows 8, we have  considered this situation. Generally, a valid installation source would include all resource for installation.
     "Features on Demand (FoD)" is a new concept in Windows 8 that allows administrators and image builders to reduce the amount of space used by the component store by adding only the payload for optional components they need to
    a system image. "Payload" refers to the binaries and other files associated with a feature.
    The major benefit of this feature is to conserve disk space. Once removed, these binaries will need to be added back from a valid installation source before the feature can be used again. Unlike the stage and un-stage process used by the component store,
    Features on Demand removal results in a permanent removal of those binaries.
    For example, I would do some customization on my Windows 10 Technical Preview.
    I mount this image first:
    DISM /mount-image /imagefile:c:\recoveryimage\install.wim /index:3 /mountdir:c:\image
    Get the feature list to check which I want to preserve:
    Dism /Image:C:\image /Get-Features
    Choose one or some to remove:
    DISM /image:c:\image /disable-feature /featurename:feautername /remove
    Verify the state of the feature is removed:
    DISM /image:c:\image /get-featureinfo /featurename:feautername
    Commit the changes to the WIM:
    DISM /unmounts-image /mountdir:c:\image /commit
    Alex Zhao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Q: Oracle Linux 5 Hardisk Size Required?

    What is the hard disk size required to install Oracle Linux 5 in Dell Intel Server? Any information provided will be very much appreciated.

    The answer will depend on your installed RAM. It could be the the size of your installed RAM plus 5 GB for the OS.
    Since Oracle Linux is actually a clone of Red Hat, you can check the Red Hat documentation online. The following link should answer your questions:
    http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Installation_Guide/s2-diskpartrecommend-x86.html
    or check the installation guide at: https://linux.oracle.com/documentation/
    For other limits and min. requirements:
    http://www.redhat.com/rhel/compare/
    A lot of info is also at http://linux.oracle.com
    Since you are using DELL you might want to check for hardware compatibility at http://content.dell.com/us/en/enterprise/d/operating-systems/redhatalliance.aspx and verify your current firmware and install required drivers for RHEL/Oracle Linux if necessary.

  • Disk size in ise

    Hi
    I have a strange problem after instaling licenses in ISE the following information is in a "show tech"
    This info is for 1.3 clean install + license.
    % WARNING: ISE DISK SIZE NOT LARGE ENOUGH FOR PRODUCTION USE
    % RECOMMENDED DISK SIZE: 200 GB, CURRENT DISK SIZE: 0 GB
    It is the same in the Eval version but in this server there is a 2500 license
    The same is observed in both ISE 1.2.1 and 1.3 (running a POC on ISE)
    When trying to upgrade ISE 1.2.1 > 1.3 the following output
    Getting bundle to local machine...
     md5: ad7d87d383661bce671804a9e125e42b
     sha256: 2a7ebe5196e3d956ac42ec2e5acdf3815a3e0f80db954b58e2c68843bb3c42fd
    % Please confirm above crypto hash matches what is posted on Cisco download site.
    % Continue? Y/N [Y] ? Y
    Unbundling Application Package...
    Initiating Application Upgrade...
    % Warning: Do not use Ctrl-C or close this terminal window until upgrade completes.
    -Checking VM for minimum hardware requirements
    % Error: At least 100GB sized hard disk required for upgrade.
    the disk is
    Hard Disk Count(*): 1
    Disk 0: Device Name: /dev/sda
    Disk 0: Capacity: 644.20 GB
    Disk 0: Geometry: 255 heads 63 sectors/track 78325 cylinders
    Thanks 
    Erik Loeth

    Attached is the output from VMware, this is made with the OVA
    ISE-1.3.0.876-virtual-SNS3495-2.ova
    The disk output from show inventory
    NAME: "ISE-VM-K9          chassis", DESCR: "ISE-VM-K9          chassis"
    PID: ISE-VM-K9         , VID: V01 , SN: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    Total RAM Memory: 16467264 kB
    CPU Core Count: 4
    CPU 0: Model Info: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 4870  @ 2.40GHz
    CPU 1: Model Info: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 4870  @ 2.40GHz
    CPU 2: Model Info: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 4870  @ 2.40GHz
    CPU 3: Model Info: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7- 4870  @ 2.40GHz
    Hard Disk Count(*): 1
    Disk 0: Device Name: /dev/sda
    Disk 0: Capacity: 644.20 GB
    Disk 0: Geometry: 255 heads 63 sectors/track 78325 cylinders
    NIC Count: 1
    NIC 0: Device Name: eth0
    NIC 0: HW Address: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
    NIC 0: Driver Descr: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver
    (*) Hard Disk Count may be Logical.
    Reards
    Erik Loeth

  • How to determine physical disk size on solaris

    I would like to know whether there is a simple method available for determining physical hard disk sizes on Sun sparc machines. On HP based machines it is simple:
    1. run "ioscan -fnC disk" - to find all disk devices and there raw device target address ie /dev/rdsk/c0t2d2
    2. run "diskinfo /dev/rdsk/c0t2d2" - display the attributes of the physical disk including size in Kbyes.
    This simple process allows me create simple scripts that I can use to automate collation of audit data for a large number of HP machines.
    On Sun based machines I've looked at the prtvtoc, format, and devinfo commands and have had no joy. Methods and suggestion will be well appriciated.

    ok,
    format should say .....eg
    type format ..
    AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
    0. c0t0d0 <SUN2.1G cyl 2733 alt 2 hd 19 sec 80>
    if this is not a Sun disk, and you do not get the info,
    select the required disk and select partition and then print. This will display what you need.
    hope this helps

  • Disk size and backups

    Hello
    I wander what is required disk size on hana when migrating from e.g Oracle to Hana?
    E.g under oracle I have 1Tb database (and something more if I backup also at OS level)
    What will I have under Hana ? How much to backup?
    Thank you a lot
    Jan

    Dear Jan,
    The first thing we need to perform before migrating from AnyDb to HANA is memory sizing. SAP provides specific notes for memory sizing of different SAP Applications as mentioned bel     ow
    1793345 - Sizing for SAP Suite on HANA
    1637145 - SAP BW on HANA: Sizing SAP In-Memory Database
    1872170 - Suite on HANA memory sizing
    1736976 - Sizing Report for BW on HANA  
    The objective if the the above is to get the footprint of uncompressed DATA in AnyDB.
    That forms one of the parameter for sizing the HANA DB.
    Based on this sizing information one would use the suitable T-Shirt sized HANA Appliance from the hardware vendor. We then have to apply the
    Traditional the RAM should be atleast 2x(uncompressed_DB / Compression factor) and the Disk space would be at least 3-4xRAM for persisitance layer and 1xRAM for logs.
    The compression factor might be around 4-7 times depending on the type SAP application.
    Regards
    Arshad

  • Building a dvd with custom disk size (disk, ISO, or dvd folder)

    My goal at the end of all this is to get a DVD format of video at 6mbps with menu's to be burned to a blu-ray 25GB disk.
    Using Encore CS6 on a Windows 7 (4.7Gzh 8-core, 16gb ram @2400mhz)
    1st attempt:  I used a bluray disk and tried to burn a dvd format and it ejected my disk and said please insert a black dvd. (used custom disk of 25GB showing extra space available)
    2nd attempt: I thought perhaps I would build it to an ISO (also tried dvd folder) to burn later. it responded with an error message saying, "disk capacity is too small - building navigation failed"
    I dont care how I can get this to work but I would like to get all the video and menu's onto a single disk. Encore limits the "custom disk size" to 99GB so I assume it should work for 25GB (23.2GB).
    The reason I dont want to make a bluray format is because it requires high bitrate and the video is so old it would be a waist of space. I dont need 720p of video from 1935. (unless I can make a bluray format at a 6mbps)
    Thank you for any help you can provide
    bullfrogberry

    You can do this in Encore.
    I am assuming you are only picking presets, and not customizing one. You pick prests in the Transcode Settings dialog. Do you see the "Edit Quality Presets" button? Pick it, customize one by setting the bitrates to get the results you want, then SAVE IT as your own. Then pick that in the transcode setting. (In the transcode setting image, you can see my custom example "Stan Custom 4Mb CBR".) And yes, you can select all your video assets and apply this custom preset to all of them at once. I would do one short one to see if you are getting in the ball park. I would do 2 samples: one in MPEG2-Bluray and one in H.264-Blu-ray. (I'd follow Richard's recommendation to  you and use H.264.)

  • Disk Label requirement

    Hi,
    Any one explain, why disk labeling required . If there is no disk label it will create problem, please clarify.
    Regards,
    Siva

    I'm not in the expert class, I'm simply another Solaris administrator but I can give you a simple answer. The disk label is required because it provides some very basic low level information needed by the system for disk access. If the disk is divided into partitions, the disk label would give an indication as to the location and size of each partition. If you wanted to mount a filesystem stored in the fifth partition on the disk, the system can use the data recorded in the disk label to find that partition. Of course, things have a way of getting complicated. There are different sorts of disk labels so you can have situations where you have the wrong kind label on a disk for a particular purpose. That's where understanding the requirements can get tricky.

  • "raidctl -l c0t0d0" in T1000 shows incorrect disk size

    We are using hardware raid1, set up with raidctl command on our T1000. When I issue "raidctl -l c0t0d0" in our T1000 it shows incorrect disk size of 689.9M, instead of 136G. This seems to have started with 12/1/09 Recommended Patch Cluster for Solaris 10. Is anyone else seeing this and/or know of a fix?

    Hello
    We've been told to install patch 144017-01 although we've yet to perform this to see if it fixes the problem.
    “After installing mpt patch 141743-02 or later drive capacity is incorrectly reported”
    SunOS 5.10: mpt.so.1 patch
    Status: RELEASED
    Patch Id: 144017-01
    READ THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT") IN THE LEGAL_LICENSE.TXT
    FILE CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS SOFTWARE. BY USING THE SOFTWARE, YOU
    AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO ALL OF THE
    TERMS, PROMPTLY DESTROY THE UNUSED SOFTWARE.
    For further information on patching best practices and resources, please
    see the Big Admin Patching Center, http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/patches/
    Summary: SunOS 5.10: mpt.so.1 patch
    Date: Mar/17/2010
    Installation Requirements:
    NA
    Solaris Release: 10
    Sun OS Release: 5.10
    Unbundled Product:
    Unbundled Release:
    Xref: This patch available for x86 as patch 144018
    Topic:
    SunOS 5.10: mpt.so.1 patch
    Relevant Architecture: sparc
    BugId's fixed with this patch:
    6881276
    Changes incorporated in this version:
    Patches accumulated and obsoleted by this patch:
    Patches which conflict with this patch:
    Required Patches:
    127127-11 137137-09 139555-08 141444-09 (or greater)
    Obsoleted by:
    Files Included in this Patch:
    /usr/lib/raidcfg/mpt.so.1
    /usr/lib/raidcfg/sparcv9/mpt.so.1
    Problem Description:
    6881276 after installing mpt patch 141743-02 or later drive capacity is incorrectly reported
    Revision History:
    Patch Installation Instructions:
    Please refer to the man pages for instructions on using 'patchadd'
    and 'patchrm' commands provided with Solaris.
    The following example installs a patch to a standalone machine:
    example# patchadd /var/spool/patch/123456-07
    The following example removes a patch from a standalone system:
    example# patchrm 123456-07
    For additional examples please see the appropriate man pages. Any
    other special or non-generic installation instructions should be
    described below as special instructions.
    Special Install Instructions:
    None.
    README -- Last modified date: Wednesday, March 17, 2010

  • Disk size in Solaris 10

    I have some confusion about disk subsystem in Solaris, i am trying to clarify from this forum.
    I have recently installed Solaris 10 in one SPARC box. After i installed, the format gives the bellow output.
    0 root wm 19491 - 29648 4.88GB (10158/0/0) 10239264
    1 swap wu 0 - 4062 1.95GB (4063/0/0) 4095504
    2 backup wm 0 - 29648 14.25GB (29649/0/0) 29886192
    From the above output, is the size of my disk is 14 GB ?, or the size of my disk is 14+2+5=21 GB ?
    I am trying to learn ZFS, so i want another partition in this disk so that i create ZFS on that partition.
    I have gone to single user mode by using CD. I assumed that, from the above "format" command output, i thought i have 21GB of disk size and 14GB of free space. So i created another partition with 14GB. Now the format command gives bellow output.
    0 root wm 19491 - 29648 4.88GB (10158/0/0) 10239264
    1 swap wu 0 - 4062 1.95GB (4063/0/0) 4095504
    2 backup wm 0 - 29648 14.25GB (29649/0/0) 29886192
    3 reserved wm 0 - 29127 14.00GB (29128/0/0) 29361024
    When i am creating ZFS, it given me a warning that the the partition i have specified is spanned into root partition (first partition), and it mentioned to use "-f" option.
    With "-f", it created successfully.
    If i assume now that the size of my disk is 14GB only then,
    (1) how come two partitions are pointing to the same area in the disk ?
    (2) How come two different filesystems are pointing to the same area ?
    Please anyone clarify my doubts. Thank you.

    Assuming a standard labeled disk it is standrad practice to have section/slice 2 being 'whole disk' for purposes of 'backup'. That would tend to indicate you have a 14GB disk. A prtvtoc /dev/dsk/c?t?d?s2 (change the ?s to the right values) will give a little more on the disk geometry.
    In the display from format column 4 is the start cylinder of the partition and column 5 is the end cylinder. From the first set out output it looks like cyclinders 4063 to 19490 are not allocated
    In the second set you have created a new slice (section 3) that overlaps both sections 0 and 1 - which is generally considered to be bad!

  • MS 6147 max memory and disk sizes

    For the MS 6147 can anybody confirm the max Hard disk size and max memory.  
    It will not recognise the 40Gb HD I am trying to fit, and only recognises half of the 256Mb memeory simm I have fitted.
    The BIOS version is 1.9 but I think that is a 'special' by Packard Bell.  The MSI BIOS download site makes no mention of disk problems rectified right up to V1.8 which is the latest, with the exception of one for the ZX chipset only which addresses EDMA 66 problem.
    Anybody got a definitive answer on this?

    Supports a maximum memory size of 256MB (8M x 8) or
       512MB (16M x 4) registered DIMM only
    how many chips on dimm is what counts with older boards
    go to drive makers web site get jumper settings to limit it to 32gb and try

  • Is there a max SATA disk size in OSX 10.4.11 and G4/1.25?

    Hello,
    I am trying to set up a G4/1.25 (2 gig in memory) as a fileserver with a SATA card and 2 x 3 TB seagate disks. This is the setup:
    http://lowendmac.com/ppc/mdd-power-mac-g4-1.25-ghz.html
    http://firmtek.com/seritek/seritek-1v4/
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Seagate/ST3000DM001/
    The system is OSX 10.4.11. I am unable to initialize the disks in disk utility. The process starts but then halts and says that it can not continue.
    My question is if there is a max disk size in OSX 10.4.11?
    Any help greatly appriceated.
    Best regards,
    Ingolfur Bruun

    Hello again,
    I tried to work my way around armed with your input and succeeded
    By using a FireWire dock I was able to see the disks in 10.4.11. What I did was to partition the disks with ONE partition in Disk Utility and then format with GUID partitioning scheme instead of the Apple Partition Mapping scheme which I had done before. And as I am using a ATA disk as a startup disk it dosen't matter if the 3 TB disks are not bootable. They will only be used for data, not as system disks.
    You saved my day! Thanks again.
    Best regards,
    Ingolfur

  • MacBook in target disk mode shows incorrect disk size

    My 80 GB hard drive in MacBook has gone bad (the filesystem is in inconsistent state). I connected it to an iMac in Target Disk Mode. It shows up (unmounted) but the capacity reported by Disk Utility is 20 GB. Does someone know why is that? Is it due to the corrupt filesystem?
    I am afraid that given this situation, if I buy and run DiskWarrior, that too might not be able to see the full disk and fail to repair it. Note that if I boot my MacBook using the Apple CD, the Disk Utility shows the correct disk size.
    Thanks.

    If you have a disk that is in really, really bad shape to the point that Disk Utility looks at you like a 5 year old that just spilled a glass of apple juice on the kitchen floor, it's time to bring in the big guns.
    DiskWarrior.
    I love it, I love it. If someone has something bad to say about it, they are lying. If there is a chance that you can get everything back to normal without spending the huge dough to send your drive out to be dismantled in a clean room, DiskWarrior is that chance.
    It's worth every single penny.
    Let me know if you have other queries.

Maybe you are looking for