Display quality in Xperia z1. triluminus and x realty

at the moment when I bought this, I was excited about sony's triluminus display technology, but now I'm dossapointed there is no difference between z1 display and xperia c display.
firstly I don't know, whether this is a z1 series problem or only mine.
x reality is always on in my z1,,, but I didn't see any difference in video/photos, if I turn off x reality. what is the solution for this.

That's odd, install or reinstall the latest update
Update Service (SUS)
PC Companion (PCC)
Bridge (for Mac)
Alternatives on How to backup Xperias
http://talk.sonymobile.com/thread/36355
"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." Kurt Cobain (1967-1994)

Similar Messages

Display quality differences between different user accounts

My friend's MBP 15 (2009) has a noticeable difference in display quality between his main account and his guest account - in his account colors are 'blown out' more, and the detail of fonts on menu items or the aqua buttons are not as clear.
We've tried copying over any plist items which mention 'display' from Library>preferences, and both accounts use the same color profile (the standard one). What else might explain the difference?

Check System Preferences > Universal Access > Seeing tab. Check that the enhance contrast slider is all the way to the left. (normal).
Regards

Extreme poor quality in full screen preview and exported movie

I have spend evenings and evenings to create the content of a project.
After dealing with error -108 and extreme poor quality in full screen preview and in exported movies (extreme stuttering) I decided to install my iMac new again.
The error -108 disappeared, but the extreme stuttering still remained in full screen preview and in exported movies.
If I make the preview screen in the iMovie browser as big as possible there is nothing to see of any stuttering.
Now I am getting pretty annoyed and have no clue what to do anymore (how to solve this problem) .....
Anyone any suggestion ?
The orginal video was recorded with a Panasonic HD camcorder.
I do have a mid 2011 iMac with 16GB ram and 256GB SSD and 1TB HD with a complete clean installation
of OS X Lion and iLife. This configuration should be enough to create a proper movie :-(

mantralightroom wrote:
why is it this option disabled? do the generate monitor sized previews increase a lot the cache a lot!
Potentially, yes. The standard Preview is 1024 pixels, longest size. Some people (like Omke) have displays 2560 pixels longest side, potentially increasing file size by over 500%.

Display quality in Editor

I am a new user of PSE 8 and
have the following problem:
The image display quality is noticeably poorer in the Editor compared with the same image quality in organizer and a number of other jpg display programs(eg. Windows live photo gallery, Canon editing software). The effect is slightly washed out and lower contrast images. This was particularly noticeable working with old scanned black and white photos.
I am running 64 bit windows 7, Nvidia graphics, 23 inch Samsung hi def LCD monitor.
Any suggestions?

Originally posted by: d.kleinrath.inode.at
Thanks Anthony,
You mean that implementing a way to save higher quality image files also=
=
means that the resolution of the diagram needs to be changeable as a =
whole? So one should be able to insert higher quality bitmaps into the =
diagram once this is fixed?
Dieter
> Hi Dieter
>
> This is https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D139574
>
> Cheers...
> Anthony
>
>
> "Dieter Kleinrath" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:op.ujhu5xe8pj7es5@ben-f9ea5088efe...
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there any way to change the resolution of a GMF diagram so I can
>> display and print high quality images in my editor?
>>
>> When I create a default editor the resolution of a Din A4 diagram see=
ms =
>> to
>> be about 1000x700 pixel (~85 DPI). This is a very low quality for
>> displaying/printing images so I'd like to use diagrams with 300 DPI o=
r
>> more in my editor.
>>
>> Thanks for your help,
>> Dieter

Recommended Apple Displays for vintage 7350, G3/33 and Q650 Macintosh's?

I am looking for an Apple compatible display solution for a Quadra 650, a Workgroup Server 7350 and a G3/300. At this time I have the following displays at disposal: a vintage 12-inch RGB display which is connected to my vintage Mac LC, a 15-inch IBM G50 CRT with resolution comprised between 640x480@85Hz and 1024x768@72 Hz, and two professional colour CRT manufactured by Philips in the 202P40 and 70 series (which are presently connected to my PC workstations and used as dual-displays on Matrox Parhelia.)
My original plan was to use the Quadra 650 for creative writing as a replacement for the venerable LC. To this purpose a 12-inch RGB is a bit restricted (512x384), but quite practical from the desk space saving viewpoint. Perhaps a 14-inch Apple display could do well, but which one? Multiple Scan series?
The 7350/233 and G3/300 are respectively using their original video board and an ATI Rage Pro chipset. Their use would be either dedicated to scanning tasks (mainly digitisation of written media) as well as Internet gateway (for the G3 only). Colour fidelity is not prerequisite at this stage. The 15-inch IBM G50 is a capable monitor, but I think that it would be great to have a monitor with flicker-free resolution of 1024x768 for web browsing. So what is the good choice among vintage Apple displays?
I read quite numerous articles about Apple displays, and it seems that some models like the 1710 are to be avoided, according to LowEndMac. Conversely they provide excellent compatibility with vintage Macintosh graphic boards. I am particularly concerned with graphic display quality because I spend many hours in front of a computer display every day. This is the reason why I invested time and money to assemble a dual Philips 202P CRT display working space in combination with top-quality Matrox Parhelia graphic boards.
I also read about issues when using conventional CRT displays on Apple graphic boards because the OS seems to restrict the resolution and refresh rates to 75Hz. But is it true?!
Again many thanks in advance for your excellent forum and qualitative feedback.

For your Quadra 650, which you want to use for word processing text, there is an interesting paradox. There is a "hole" in the display capabilities of most computers.
15 inch displays:
can easily show 800 by 600, and 832 by 624 will fit on most displays with the picture slightly less than life size.
17 inch displays:
can show 832 by 624 with a 3/8 inch black border all around.
19 inch displays:
can display 1024 by 768 easily
If desk space is an issue, the clear winner is a 15 inch display. The difference between Super VGA at 800 by 600 and Mac 16 inch at 832 by 624 is not very large. Either could be used.
There is a document that discusses the use of sense pins, displays, and adapters with the Quadra series, which includes the Quadra 650:
9089- Quadra Series, Centris Series: Displays, Video Pinouts

Poor full screen display quality

I am in a dual-display environment. One display I have set up as a full-screen display for images as I edit them in Aperture. They show up in a dismally poor quality; a grid-like low resolution. When I zoom in on them, the issue goes away. It's just when an image is displayed in its entirety. This is a 20" Cinema display. Note that there is no display quality issue with Photoshop. Thanks.

Which picture is the refence picture?
I have been noticing that the same image in different programes does look different, colour and tone.. Now I understand that as each programe reads the data differently. BUT with Aperture I have noticed this is the case within aperture and this is crazy.
The photo is different in the loupe again different in the full frame version and yet again with in the grid. So when using the loupe is it possible to compare images enlarged from the grid and so on! and on. and the exported images look diferent again when viewed...
Strange as it is all on one monitor!
Or am I the only one to notice this?
icu2

Display quality changed

This is weird... My iPod nano spontaneously reset while I was using it, and after that I noticed that the display quality seems to have gone down. Pictures that previously had smooth color transitions now appear dithered. It almost looks as if the bit depth of the display decreased. Has anybody seen anything like this?? Am I going nuts here??
Resetting the iPod didn't fix this. Replacing the images did not fix this. Help?

Agreed, reset the Nano but use the iPod updater to get fresh code back in. A clickwheel+button reset continues reusing corrupted code.

Image display QUALITY controll bar/change/modifi

Hello
the bridges display quality of jpegs and raw images is awfull!!!
i see blockiness in all of my images, how can i watch my photos like this??
there is no crispness!
u should made a picture display quality controll bar like speed-------quality
so the user can select!

Frosti,
This request has been made many times. The development team are aware of the need for 100% previews. However, such a feature, if provided, will not be available until at least Bridge 2. Based on previous upgrade cycles that would be late 2006, at earliest. In the meantime you might consider providing more information on the type of images you're trying to preview (i.e. Raw, JPG, etc).
Also, I would suggest that you soften the tone of your comments otherwise you'll find yourself with Read Only access.
IanLyons
Forum Host

Dynamically Changing Display Quality for Children

I am interested in changing the display quality for a child SWF that is loaded in at Runtime, and changing it's Display quality based on user interaction. Anyone know if this is possible?
I have the following below, however it changes the entire application, not just the dynamically loaded SWF
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
                  xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
                  xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" minWidth="955" minHeight="600"
                  applicationComplete="init()">
     <fx:Declarations>
     </fx:Declarations>
     <fx:Script>
          <![CDATA[
               private var mc:*;
               private function init():void{
                    var loader:Loader = new Loader();
                    loader.contentLoaderInfo.addEventListener( Event.COMPLETE, handleComp );
                    loader.load( new URLRequest( "my/swf/file.swf" ) );
               private function handleComp( _event:Event ) :void{
                    mc = (_event.target.content)
                    av.addChild( mc );
               private function changeQuality( _q:String ):void{
                    switch (_q){
                         case "low":          av.stage.quality = "low";          break;
                         case "medium":     av.stage.quality = "medium";     break;
                         case "high":     av.stage.quality = "high";          break;
          ]]>
     </fx:Script>
     <s:VGroup>
          <s:HGroup>
               <s:Button label="low" click="changeQuality( 'low' )" />
               <s:Button label="medium" click="changeQuality( 'medium' )" />
               <s:Button label="high" click="changeQuality( 'high' )" />
          </s:HGroup>
          <s:SpriteVisualElement id="av" height="300" width="100" />
     </s:VGroup>
</s:Application>

Sorry i talked to fast...
In fact I think there is only one instance of the Stage object in a running player. So the only way to do this would be to rasterize your Sprite and store it in a BitmapData object, changing the quality of the stage juste before rasterization and then restoring back after. There is something in the doc that talk about this kind of thing: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/as3/mobile/WS4bebcd66a74275c36c11f3d612431904db9-7ffb.html
Hope this is helpful...

Where are display quality pref's in CS6 AI?

What happened to the display quality preference in AI CS6? I've got banding in a blend on screen, and can't tell if it's artifact of display or truly a problem with the blend.

rexprints wrote:
But my question was about rendering of gradients, not necessarily in the EPS file format.
That sounds different in #2.
Anyway: Banding on screen will not necessarily mean banding in print. Talk to your print service provider, because it depends on their equipment and of course on how exactly your stuff is printed. There are lots of different techniques and machines around.

Satellite P870 *PSPLFA-01C001) display quality is dull

Hi all,
Love my new laptop but the screen /display quality is really dull.
Games aren't jagged they just aren't crisp.
The webcam video quality is shocking. It's probably a setting that can fix this, if so can you point me in the right direction to fix this please as it's annoying me
Thanks,
Maxy

Youve got this notebook:
http://www.mytoshiba.com.au/products/computers/satellite/p870/psplfa-01c001/specifications
It has been released with an +17.3 Toshiba TruBrite High Definition+ Widescreen TFT Active Matrix XGA 200NIT CSV (1600 x 900) resolution and LED backlighting+
The screen resolution of 1600 x 900 is really good (better than display with 1024x 768px) and the display brightness can be changes in 8 steps:
1 means lowest brightness, 8 means highest brightness.
level8 220
level7 170
level6 130
level5 95
level4 60
level3 40
level2 30
level1 20

Ps CS6 Request: User control over display quality versus performance (modified request)

It would be great if there was user control of the zoom threshold at which display quality is sacrificed for performance.
I mean the threshold which determines the maintaining of bit-depth in the calculation of the composite which is displayed when working with 16-bit documents, and the accuracy of displayed layer effects in documents with any bit-depth.
The threshold currently seems to be approx 64% zoom - not much of a zoom out when dealing with large images destined for print.
Please provide a control for that threshold in Preferences > Performance.

Thank you for posting, conroy. I have an example of the inconvenient effects of Photoshop CS6 allowing the zoomed-out composite to be innaccurate.
Here's a real-world application for everyone to see.
In my below example you're not seeing a 16-bit doc, just 8-bit, BTW.
Top C has Layer Styles. Bottom C is a copy that's been merged with a blank layer, to effectively "collapse" it's Layer Styles into a normal single pixel layer.
The difference is staggering. This file is a massize 28x36 300DPI (8,400px X 10,800px) poster.
So on something like this, while working and tweaking everything you work worked zoomed out so you see enough of the document to be able monitor it's evolution.
I was working at 25% zoom (depisted above) for a quite a while. Got everything good, but then zoomed in only to see that each letter actually looked like pretty bad compared to what the zoomed composite was telling me.
I had to revise all letters.
For hi-res print I guess I better get used to zooming in and out constantly, so I know what to trust.
I wonder if this issue will ever be rectified. Like Conroy suggests, maybe a setting that allows users to voluntarily sacrifice performance in favor of a more accurate composite?

Nikon .NEF file iPad display quality

Hello,
I have added some RAW .NEF Nikon photos to my iPad and notice the display quality is pixelated somewhat and terrible to look at. I read somewhere that the iPad apparently takes the thumbnail image and not the actual photo when importing.
Can anyone tell me if this is the case or am I doing something wrong? JPEG photos are displayed correctly, I really don't want to convert all my photos to .JPEG before adding to my iPad.
Thanks

Same problem here:
I use the ipad alot for photo editing. It used to work fine with .nef files before I 'upgraded' to Ios 5.0.
It all sounds nice, syncing your photos to iCloud, but it downsizes your .nef files to 500k in the process now when syncing to the iPad. So worthless for photo editing or for me even just viewing photos on the ipad. When importing from the camera directly it seems fine, untill you want to sync with a pc or iCloud and sync back again. Only option I found is to not sync with iCloud for photos and convert all to .jpeg. This is a downgrade for me not an upgrade. I do not use iCloud because it can't handle my needs and now I am forced to convert all to jpeg. Photogene worked fine with .nef, for photo editing .nef is of much better quality than .jpeg. Why have a 64gb drive if your not allowed to have big .nef files on it?
Can I somehow get back to Ios 4.x?
Or someone knows if other devices like samsung (sorry Apple) handle .raw pics?

Terrible display quality on Zoom Out

Just upgraded to PS Elements 9. In most view>zoom levels (including the presets "Fit On Screen" and "Fill Screen"), the images display terribly pixelated on the screen. I understand that zooms in excess of 100% will naturally pixelate, but I have this problem at almost every zoom ratio UNDER 100% as well. Only a few "benchmark" zoom levels (like, 25%, for example) display nice and sharp. Of course, 100% displays fine, too. All other zoom levels (whether manually-entered or using the preset zoom levels) are highly pixelated. I didn't have this problem in my old PSE2.
Is there a setting somewhere I can use to improve the display quality of zoomed images?
Thanks.

If your not seeing the pixelation at 25%, 50% or 100% then there's probably nothing you can
change. I suspect if you were to open the images in pse2 and view them at the exact same
viewing percent, then the same thing would happen.
Pse2 had more screen space for displaying images so they may have been bigger
and appeared less pixelated. For example in pse2, most of my images are displayed at 50%
when opened, where as pse9 displays them around 47% which appears pixelated until
set to 50% view.
MTSTUNER

ThinkPad E440 Webcam poor display quality! Please Help

Hi all,
Anyone have the poor display quality webcam from ThinkPad E440?
This is the first timeI bought a Lenovo product: a ThinkPad E440 with i7 cpu few days ago (I am currently using ASUS UX31). Everything is great except that the webcam have extremely poor quality:
1. When I use the camera application, the photo is grainy with extremely poor resolution
2. The video chat at night not just very poor in resolution, it actually turn into Black & White at night, in the morning it have color but still extremely poor display quality. Attached photo is taken around evening, no color was detected, all in black and white......is that the normal quality from ThinkPad E440?
I have updated all my drivers again and again.
I am not sure if it is a defect or it is buid to be that poor? How can I troubleshoot before send for repair?
Product model: 20C5CTO1WW
The webcam is intergrated camera HD720p
The video card is Intel(R) HD Graphic 4600
Please Help! Thanks.

Hi Wtteoh,
Welcome to Lenovo Community!
As per the query we understood that you are facing issue with Web camera on your ThinkPad E440.
Are you checking in Lenovo communication setting? Have you checked with different application like skype?
Please click here to visit the camera test page and click on allow to start the camera and let us know if the issue still persists.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Hemanth Kumar
Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

Display quality in Xperia z1. triluminus and x realty

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for