Display Resolution with Beige G3

Hello,
I am running a G3 Beige with an OWC G4 500 MHz OWC upgrade processor. The machine is running Mac OS 10.4.8 well.
I love to have more choice in the display resolution. A few days ago, I accidentally touched a couple of things, and was able to change the resolution to a higher one. However, when i reboot the machine later, the magic disappeared. I cannot recall what I did to increae the choice of display resolution.
Can you tell me what I can do to change the resolution from 832X624?

You want separate Syncs.
The CRT is supplied with data for its Red, Green, and Blue Electron guns on pairs of wires (or coaxial wires) reserved for them. The CRT sweeps the electron beams across the face of the display and "lights up" one row of dots, then steps down one row, returns to the left side, and gets ready for the next row.
There is no row buffer in the CRT, it displays the Red Green and Blue data "live", 60 or more times a second. The data for each row is supplied at the right instant to display it properly across the row. In order to position the beam properly to display the correct row data, the CRT must know when rows and screens start and end.
Horizontal Sync - tells when a row should start and end. The beams are "blanked" during Horizontal Retrace time.
Vertical Sync - tells when the entire screen should start and end, and the beam should be brought back up to the top. The beams are blanked during the manyrow_timeslong Vertical Retrace time.
Some cheaper monitors combined the Horizontal and Vertical Sync together electrically and provided the combined signal as "Composite Sync". The CRT was responsible for pulling the separate signals out of the composite.
The other trick that saved one more pin in the cable was to combine the Composite Sync information onto the Green data signal. The CRT had to dig out both Horizontal and Vertical Sync from the Green data line. This had a tendency to make the Green data less crisp.
Macs have always provided separate Syncs. Except, perhaps, for the very first Mac-II displays, genuine Apple Mac displays have accepted only Separate Syncs.

Similar Messages

  • Graphics card issue/display resolution with 30" display

    I've got a PowerMac G5 with a ATI Radeon 9800TX graphics card. I recently bought a 30" Apply Cinema Display but I can't get the display resolution on the computer to go any higher than 1280x800. I've read through some of the other postings and tired moving the cable from one DVI port to the other but that didn't work. If I don't get this thing working properly soon...Apple is going to get this monitor back.

    I bought the ATI Radeon 9600 Pro Mac Edition
    Do you mean the PC & MAC Edition?
    Sometimes if I reboot it several times it works. When it works it's great resolution. The problem is every time you power down it's a battle for the computer to boot up. So, I took the card out until I can figure out why it's causing problems during start up. I followed the instructions to the letter when installing the card. First the software, then remove/replace the card.
    Any suggestions as to why the computer sometimes boots up and other times not?
    Probably a bad graphics card. Some versions of that card had that problem with some G4s, but worked with G5s. Maybe the current version fails on both G4s and G5s.

  • Facebook games 'FarmTown' & 'FarmVille' won't run. Flash 10 will not install and displays "incompatibility" with FFox

    The games Farm Town and FarmVille partially load on Facebook. The message to update Flash Player is displayed. I clicked to update Flash player, but it would not install. A message displayed saying Flash 10 is incompatible with FireFox and would not install until FireFox was shut down.

    I have Windows XP.
    In regards to my blank white page, the flash is now working again (Whether I needed to restart again or if it was a site thing).
    And I'm not sure how to go about changing my display resolution with the browser, or know where to find it for that matter. Of course there's the one you can find in the control panel/display for the whole computer in general, but that doesn't do anything except make everything larger (Since I originally had it on the highest: 1024 x 768 pixels) and doesn't change the resize compatability for flash player at all.
    Above is a screen shot of the jigsaw site I use (which is not the worst game resizing issue I've run into.) On the left side of the flash window, there are options to choose during game play, and the last option gets cut in half b/c the window won't resize correctly. And I haven't any idea if there are more options below it or not.
    Below is one of the worst resizing issues I HAVE run into. I don't play farmville anymore since this problem, among it being boring, makes it literally impossible to play the game. I brought up the marketplace option since it's the most drastic. This is all of the flash game window, which would resize anything normally on my other computers, but the images get cut off along the sides with this one. I have tried playing this game on its home site, hoping that facebook was the problem, but it's the same issue there as well.

  • Problems with the display resolution on Android

    We have a problem with the display resolution on our Google Nexus 7 (2013) and our Multi-Folio-App. If we watch an article inside our published Multi-Folio-App, the article does not use the full screen of the tablet. But when I look the article inside the content viewer, it use the full screen of the tablet. For your information: We use the resolution of 1280 x 800 and the tablet has the highest resolution of 1920 x 1200.
    However, under iOS it works without problems. We use the iPad 4 (2048 x 1536) with the article resolution of 1024 x 720. Do you have any idea what we can do? Under this post, you can find two screenshots which discribe the problem.

    Scaling was introduced in v28:
    from http://helpx.adobe.com/digital-publishing-suite/help/whats-new-release.html#what_s_new_in_ this_release
    Content on Android devices scaled up
    In previous releases, smaller renditions in Android apps were not scaled up, causing both letterboxing and pillarboxing. With v28 AIR-based Android apps, smaller renditions are now scaled up proportionally.

  • Lost display resolution options when installing 10.4.6 with 20" monitor

    I recently installed an upgrade using black retail DVD 10.4.6 from 10.2.8, and now i only have one option for display resolution (256 colors). The screen is gray??? I can restart using 9.2 Classic and the screen display is just fine (thousands & millions of colors). I did the disk utility and permission fix prior to and before installation. I also updated the firmware. I tried to download 10.4.8 combo update, but the license agreement can't be 'agreed to' because the button will not appear on the low resolution screen. Do i have to initialize the whole disk? The Monitor is a 20" Display (the large blue monster). Since it was working with 10.2.8 and still works under 9.2 Classic reboot, i doubt whether its a hardware problem.. Any ideas?

    I wonder if it could be the Voodoo5 Dfx video card that's bn not compatible with 10.4.8?? It workds with 10.2.

  • Satellite Pro A300-28R - Windows starts up with wrong display resolution

    OK so I have a Toshiba Satellite Pro A300-28R with Windows 7 64 bit and an ATI Mobility Radeon 3470 HD graphics card.
    I recently connected my laptop to a TV via the S-video connection. This worked fine. The problem is that ever since then every time I start my laptop Windows starts with the S-video display resolution of 600x800.
    I have tried changing the settings in both Control Panel and using the ATI CCC, having both selected and applied these settings but each time Windows starts now it boots with the above display resolution.
    Following this I have also uninstalled and reinstalled both my display driver and the Toshiba Value Added package but the same problem persists. I have searched with Google about this problem and haven't been able to find anything useful.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Hi thanks for your responses! Originally I used the method of closing the laptop screen while connected to the s-video and then opening the screen and logging into Windows. This then automatically detects the display and changes to that output. To get out of this you can do either do the reverse or pres Fn+ F5 to undo. This has worked perfectly for me before with VGA connections. Its only since connecting to s-video that now no matter what, every time the laptop starts up even when it is not connected to any external display, it loads with the resolution 800x600. This is not the first time I have used s-video, but it is the first time I have had this result after doing it.
    Interestingly if I change to the appropriate resolution and do a restart. The system restarts and loads to the logon screen and then into Windows in the resolution I specified before the restart but then after fully loading Windows it then changes to 800x600. It is as if the laptop is detecting that there is something connected to the s-video when there is not. I have read a fix for this whereby you can go into the system registry and turn off the feature for automatically detecting displays but I use external displays frequently and this is not a satisfactory solution. This worked perfectly before.

  • Powering large displays (23 inch) at native resolution with a powerbook G4

    Hi All,
    I have searched the forum and although I am sure this must have been addressed, I am in need of a specific response. I have a powerbook G4 17 inch with the ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 graphics card that it came with. In order to run an external display such as the Cinema Display 23" at native resolution of the display will i need to purchase a new graphics card?
    Secondly, if I have to purchase one, is it the type of repair that I could do myself?
    Thanks for any help.
    Nick
    here are the stats for my graphics card:
    ATI Mobility Radeon 9700:
    Chipset Model: ATY,RV360M11
    Type: Display
    Bus: AGP
    VRAM (Total): 64 MB
    Vendor: ATI (0x1002)
    Device ID: 0x4e50
    Revision ID: 0x0000
    ROM Revision: 113-xxxxx-134
    Displays:
    Color LCD:
    Display Type: LCD
    Resolution: 1440 x 900
    Depth: 32-bit Color
    Built-In: Yes
    Core Image: Supported
    Main Display: Yes
    Mirror: Off
    Online: Yes
    Quartz Extreme: Supported
    Display:
    Status: No display connected

    The 23" will be at full resolution if used in extended desktop mode, but if mirrored, can only match the Power Book's display resolution.

  • Display Issues with mini (Mid 2010) and LG L246WP

    I recently purchased a new mini (Mid 2010 base model) and planned to use it with my 24" LG L246WP monitor, which is about 3 years old. The monitor has VGA, component, and HDMI inputs.
    I used an HDMI-to-HDMI cable to connect the mini directly to the monitor, and the output is completely messed up. The mini recognized the monitor (titling the System Preferences > Display dialog with 'L246WP') and set it to the monitor's native resolution of 1920x1200, but on the monitor the image is cropped to what looks like a 4:3 aspect ratio and with part of the image shifted up and left so I cannot view the top menu bar or the left hand side of the desktop. The monitor's on-screen display shows 1080p in this mode.
    The Display dialog also gives me an option for 1080p. I can select this and use the Underscan slider to resize the desktop output to fit on the screen, but it is still shifted left and must be resized smaller than the available display space (plus the total image is only 1080 pixels, not using the monitor's full native screen). In this mode, 1080p also shows on the monitor's on-screen display.
    I tried 1024x768 to see if I could get a properly-positioned image, but the desktop was shifted just like in the 1920x1200 case and the monitor's on-screen display status still reported 1080p.
    The monitor has a menu setting under an HDMI heading with "Video" and "PC" options, but changing this selection does not make a difference.
    Since the monitor came out before HDMI was as widespread as it is today, it came with a DVI-to-HDMI cable, so I also tried using that cable with the HDMI-to-DVI adapter that came with the mini, but this did not make a difference either.
    To prove it wasn't the HDMI cable, I connected the mini to my Samsung 6300 series 40" LED HDTV and with some tweaking of the Underscan slider the displayed image filled the screen perfectly.
    I've searched the Internet and various forum threads (i.e. http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1167222&page=63) seem to indicate this monitor can send a corrupted EDID that causes issues, especially with nVidia graphics drivers. On Windows you can use registry or driver hacks to override the EDID with the correct values, but on OS X this doesn't seem possible (I was hoping for a Terminal one-liner but it seems this doesn't exist). I have seen some mentions of the shareware SwitchResX (http://www.madrau.com), which looks like it gives you the option to override resolution settings, but I haven't tried this yet.
    It also appears to me that the monitor is always interpreting the signal (or the mini is always sending the signal) as 1080p, even if I've set 1920x1200 in the Display dialog. I don't know if this is a defect in the monitor where it always assumes the HDMI input is a 1080p source (previous I used it with an Xbox 360 with no issues but that was 1080p HDMI), or if is a bug in the graphics drivers (or at least a lack of flexibility / miscommunication to the user trying to handle a corrupt EDID).
    I asked my local Genius Bar for advice today (without bringing any hardware in) but was not told anything I didn't already know.
    I'm trying to determine the best way to work through this issue. *My questions are:*
    Would it make any difference if I used a Mini DisplayPort-to-DVI adapter (and then my DVI-to-HDMI cable to the monitor's HDMI input)?
    What about a Mini DisplayPort-to-VGA adapter? In the past I used a 12" Powerbook (via a mini-DVI-to-VGA adapter) with this monitor and had no display issues like this, but I'd prefer to stick with a digital connection on my brand new mini.
    Is SwitchResX the only practical way in OS X to override a corrupt EDID and force the mini to output a certain resolution?
    Besides the various adapters and SwitchResX, is there anything else I should try before buying a new monitor?

    Hello EPWilson4984.
    I have been experiencing the same issues you described. Connecting my brand new Mac Mini to my Westinghouse 24”monitor (L2410NM,  1920x1200 pixel resolution) produces a very fuzzy and washed out image quality. The Mac recognizes the monitor and applies the right resolution (1920x1200), but it looks just awful. The EDID info is definitely not right.
    Now, I tried your suggestion (DVI-to-HDMI), and similar suggestions from other threads, but nothing works. Nothing seems to work at all.
    The main input for the monitor is HDMI, so whatever cable I use, in the end always has to connect to the monitor via HDMI. I tried all these combinations with zero success:
    Mac mini -> HDMI cable -> monitor (result: fuzzy and blurry image)
    Mac mini -> displayport –HDMI adapter-> HDMI cable -> monitor (result: fuzzy and blurry image)
    Mac mini  -> displayport –DVI adapter-> DVI-to-HDMI cable -> monitor (result: it gives me a blank screen, no image at all)
    I’m running out of options. Don’t know what to do. The 24” monitor produces beautiful, crisp images when hooked to my Windows 7 PC. It looks horrible when connected to my brand new Mac Mini.
    Any alternatives you may have come across? Please let me know, thank you.

  • Studio Display 21" with Mac Mini?

    I am considering getting a Mac Mini as an economical upgrade to my B/W G3 system but I want to make sire that my monitor is going to work with it. I have the origingal blue and white 21" Studio Display. the System Profiler says this......
    Displays:
    Studio Display 21:
    Display Type: CRT
    Resolution: 1152 x 870 @ 75 Hz
    Depth: 32-bit Color
    Core Image: Not Supported
    Main Display: Yes
    Mirror: Off
    Online: Yes
    Quartz Extreme: Not Supported
    Will this display work with a new Mac Mini? I really do not have the $ right now to get a new Monitor and this one works great anyway. I am also wondering how my current software,,,,,,, Photoshop,Indesign etc. will work with the new Intel Macs?
    THanks for any input
    MyShunshyn

    Can't help on the screen much - believe you need to get an adapter, as the previous post indicated. You might check in the Apple dislay area at http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=111
    Regarding your applications, as long as you're not running under OS 9 or earlier, your applications will run on the Intel mini under Rosetta emulation. Universal applications are those that have been modified to run on both the PPC and Intel macs, and they run natively. Those applications that have not been made universal run under Rosetta emulation. Photoshop is an example of an application that has not been made universal yet (supposed to happen this year with Photoshop CS3). Running under emulation does extract a performance penalty, of up to 50%, versus running in native universal mode.
    If you have applications running under OS9 or in the OS X classic environment, you'll need to upgrade to an OS X version in order to run on the Intel-based mini, and you may find there are Universal versions of your software, which would be even better.

  • How to change external display resolution WITHOUT clicking "CONFIRM"?

    I have a somewhat unusual situation. My MacBook laptop is actually now a ModBook (a pen-tablet computer), and as such I no longer have a trackpad attached to it. All of my inputs are via the stylus, tapping directly on the built-in display.
    This works perfectly fine, except when I need to give presentations on an LCD projector (which is quite often lately). I like to use the projector as an external monitor, so that I can run the Keynote presentation on it while using my laptop screen as the presenter's display, with the upcoming slide, etc. If the projector doesn't give me an ideal native display option (sometimes, the aspect ratio for the  3 or 4 resolutions available in the Displays drop-down in the menubar turn out to be stretched or squeezed), then I, naturally, have to open the Display System Preferences and try out different resolutions.
    The problem is, since my stylus only interacts by clicking directly on the built-in-display, I have no way of moving the cursor over to the external display when the dialog box with the "Click here to confirm change/You have 15 seconds..." message appears. So I can never click it ... so I can never confirm the new settings.
    The workarounds I've used so far are:
    - Mirror displays (not ideal, as I need the presenter preview of the next slide)
    - borrow a mouse from someone (usually from a Windows desktop, frankly) and plug that in to briefly mouse over and click the confirm button
    I'd love to find a software workaround that allows me to NOT mirror displays and also doesn't require me to carry around a mouse all the time (my laptop bag is already overstuffed...).
    Thanks.

    Fateh wrote:
    I hope that my question is clear ... Nope.
    How to change the display resolution of APEX ??APEX doesn't have a display resolution. "Display resolution" is an attribute of the device and user agent software used to view the APEX page.
    What do you mean by "the display resolution of APEX"?
    In other word, if an end user sees large elements on a pageWhat "large elements"?
    then he/she zooms it outHow?
    "Zooms" what—the entire page or a single "large element"?
    How can I set a proper ZOOM for my app by default ...Meaning what?
    And as usual, we're missing:
    <li>Full APEX version
    <li>Full DB/version/edition/host OS
    <li>Web server architecture (EPG, OHS or APEX listener/host OS)
    <li>Browser(s) and version(s) used
    <li>Theme
    <li>Template(s)
    <li>Region/item type(s)
    You've been posting here for years. You know this basic information is necessary to understand and reproduce problems.
    If you're looking for help it doesn't seem unreasonable that you make the effort to provide a full, clear but concise description of the problem or requirement.

  • Thinkpad Yoga - Insufficient external display resolution over the Onelink

    My local Lenovo Partner just confirmed the data in "User Guide" of the TPYoga, that the external screen resolution will only be 1920x1200.  
    "User Guide"  Page 10, http://www.lenovo.com/shop/americas/content/user_guides/tpyoga_ug_en.pdf
    "Display resolution:
    – LCD: 1366-by-768 or 1920-by-1080, depending on the model
    – External monitor: up to 1920-by-1200, depending on the monitor model"
    I mean what do I want the OneLink Dock / OneLink PRO Dock for??
    Of cause to connect a large screen and this not with a worse ppi than the intern display. So I need at least 2560x1600
     (we don’t even talk about all the disadvantages of a 16:9 screen, cause that’s off topic).
    Idealy I expect of cause a 4k resolution possibility together with the OneLink Pro Dock and multi stream (daisy chain) possibility at the display port.
    But 1920x1200 external graphic output can’t be meant serious for a 2000US$ device?? 

    Ok, let’s accept that the new Thinkpad YOGA Manual includes misinformation.
    Actually I’m sitting in front of my 2048x1152 Display which is connected to my 8 years old Asus Notebook via DVI. Does this old jalopy perform a higher resolution via DVI than the Thinkpad Yoga via “OneLink PRO Dock-DVI” does? 
    http://download.lenovo.com/ibmdl/pub/pc/pccbbs/options/tp_onelink_pro_dock_ug_en.pdf
    Page 13
    (I’m guessing in the first line (behind "One monitor") it’s supposed to mean DVI instead of DP”
    (1) Lenovo, are these technical details of the NEW OneLink Pro Dock also wrong like the Manual of the Yoga regarding the maximum resolution?
    Would be very helpful for me to plan with correct information..
    (2) And is it definitely true that I can't connect two displays at the OneLink PRO Dock with a higher resolution than 1920x1200??
    That would mean I send the Thinkpad Yoga back and better stay with my 8 years old ASUS jalopy.. smileyfrustrated:

  • Leopard "Forgets" External Display Resolution

    I have a 17" MacBook Pro C2D (Oct 2006 revision) that I use at work with an external display (Dell E197FP) that is connected to the laptop via the DVI-to-VGA adaptor. The Dell has a native display resolution of 1280*1024 @60Hz and this is set via the System Preference's Display panel. The problem is that quite often when I connect the display in the morning OS X (10.5.6, at present) "forgets" the resolution that has been set and reverts back to its default for the display, which is 1152*864 @75Hz. It is baffling to me that it keeps forgetting the selected resolution for the display, despite recognising it, and that it selects such an odd resolution as a default. This happens about once per week at the moment.
    Does anyone have an idea what is causing this and how I can stop OS X from being so forgetful?

    Are you getting one to extend your desktop? I don't, I use my MacBook with the screen off using my external only with a keyboard and mouse plugged in. I run my Late 2008 2.1GHz MacBook with a GMA X3100 using a 23" Samsung wide ratio no problem in 1680x1050. It is high resolution. Make sure you click "mirror" in Display Prefs. Be certain that you don't simply boot to both because the external will appear grainy and only be putting out the native 1280 X 800 13" MacBook resolution on the new big LCD. There are many different ways to achieve this. With the LCD on and hooked to the MacBook, turn the MacBook on then quickly close lid after the chime. Give it some time. After it boots to the external, I open the lid to provide proper airflow, some may argue it's not needed.

  • External display resolution

    I have Dell up2414q monitor which is capable of displaying up to 3840 x 2160. But when I connect my 11-inch Macbook Air (the latest 2014 model), which is capable of 2560 x 1600, shows only 1920 x 1080. This is the highest resolution listed in display setting.
    I'm using Display Port cable and enabled Display Port 1.2 setting on the monitor. I went to Apple Store and asked, but they had no idea what was wrong. My OS is 10.9.3.

    Hi there gen2014,
    You may find the information in the article below helpful.
    OS X Mavericks: Adjust your display resolution
    http://support.apple.com/kb/PH14388
    You can connect a second display and adjust its resolution. Once it’s connected, click Scaled, then select a resolution. Press the Option key while you click Scaled to see additional resolutions for the second display.
    If you continue to experience issues, take a look at the troubleshooting steps in the article below.
    Apple computers: Troubleshooting issues with video on internal or external displays
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1573
    -Griff W. 

  • External display resolution changes after returning from display sleep

    I often use an external display as a second screen with my Macbook Pro (OS X 10.8.2)  However, when I return to the computer after the display has gone to sleep, the external display resolution changes when the display reappears.  Then I have to go into System Preferences > Display and "Detect Displays" in order to return the external display to the proper resolution.
    Does anybody know of a way for me to avoid having to do this every time my display sleeps?
    Thank you,
    Adam

    I have the exact same problem.
    I found the key combination ⌘ alt F2 also restores the proper resolution on both displays, however it's still a bit annoying

  • Highest dual display resolution for mac mini mid 2011

    I am currently running a mac mini mid 2011. As I've understood (according to the below statement). Am I only able to use 2 secreen with 1920x1200 or could I use one screen with 2560x1600 and one with 1920x1200. I do NOT want mirroring, only dual displays.
    I am going to connect the screens in the following way:
    1x mini-dvi - HDMI to one screen.
    1x HDMI - HDMI to the other screen.
    Display Support:
    Dual Displays
    Resolution Support:
    1920x1200*
    Details:
    *This model simultaneously supports 1920x1200 on an HDMI display or a DVI display using the included HDMI-to-DVI adapterand 2560x1600 on a Thunderbolt or Mini DisplayPort display or even a VGA display (with an optional Mini DisplayPort-to-VGA adapter, which is compatible with the Thunderbolt port).
    2nd Display Support:
    Dual/Mirroring*
    2nd Max. Resolution:
    2560x1600*
    Details:
    *This model simultaneously supports 1920x1200 on an HDMI or a DVI display (using the included HDMI-to-DVI adapter) and2560x1600 on a Thunderbolt or Mini DisplayPort display or even a VGA display (with an optional Mini DisplayPort-to-VGA adapter, which is compatible with the Thunderbolt port).
    Thanks in advance
    Rich

    According to the copy&paste from wikipedia, HDMI should support higher resolution than 1920x1200. So the question is, does it aupport that on the mid 2011 mac mini. It says in the specifications
    "Mac mini is designed to work with HDMI devices that comply with versions 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.2a, 1.3, 1.3a, and 1.4 of the HDMI specification."
    That should mean it should be able to support it, but I don't know : <
    HDMI version
    1.0
    1.1
    1.2
    1.3
    1.4
    2.0
    Date initially released
    December 9, 2002
    May 20, 2004
    August 8, 2005
    June 22, 2006
    May 28, 2009
    September 12, 2013
    Maximum clock rate (MHz)
    165
    165
    165
    340
    340[109]
    600
    Maximum TMDS throughput per channel (Gbit/s) including 8b/10b overhead
    1.65
    1.65
    1.65
    3.40
    3.40
    6
    Maximum total TMDS throughput (Gbit/s) including 8b/10b overhead
    4.95
    4.95
    4.95
    10.2
    10.2
    18
    Maximum throughput (Gbit/s) with 8b/10b overhead removed
    3.96
    3.96
    3.96
    8.16
    8.16
    14.4
    Maximum audio throughput (Mbit/s)
    36.86
    36.86
    36.86
    36.86
    36.86
    Maximum color depth (bit/px)
    24
    24
    24
    48[a]
    48
    Maximum resolution over single link at 24-bit/px[b]
    1920×1200p60
    1920×1200p60
    1920×1200p60
    2560×1600p75
    4096×2160p24
    4096×2160p60
    Maximum resolution over single link at 30-bit/px[c]
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    2560×1600p60
    4096×2160p24
    Maximum resolution over single link at 36-bit/px[d]
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    1920×1200p75
    4096×2160p24
    Maximum resolution over single link at 48-bit/px[e]
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    1920×1200p60
    1920×1200p60
    Maximum 3D resolution (using a full resolution 3D format) over single link at 24-bit/px
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    1920×1200p60

Maybe you are looking for