Display size in fullScreenMode

i hava a class which extends Canvas.
because i need a fullScreenApplication i used this.setFullScreenMode(true);
this works quit good, but when i use getHeight() and getWidth() in order to receive the height and width of the whole display, i unfortunately don't get them.
instead only the dimensions of the canvas not using fullScreenMode are returned.
i also don't understand the values of the returned width and height -> 240 x 309.
my phone (nokia 6600) only has a resolution of 176 x 208. are these twips? if yes, how can i convert them to pixels?
i hope somebody can help me with this problem
greetz

thx for your advice, but unfortunately getClipHeight from the Graphics object returns the same value as getHeight from the Canvas Object.
probably i have to get the height from the device itself, but i don't know how..

Similar Messages

In previous versions of Firefox I was able increase the display size on Flickr which remained unless I altered it again. Does any one know how to do this on Firefox 4?

Question
In previous versions of Firefox I was able increase the display size on Flickr which remained unless I altered it again. Does any one know how to do this on Firefox 4

Make sure that you not run Firefox in (permanent) [[Private Browsing]] mode.
* You enter Private Browsing mode if you select: Tools > Options > Privacy > History: Firefox will: "Never Remember History"
* To see all History and Cookie settings, choose: Tools > Options > Privacy, choose the setting <b>Firefox will: Use custom settings for history</b>
* Uncheck: [ ] "Permanent Private Browsing mode"
You can use one of these extensions to adjust the default font size and page zoom on web pages:
* Default FullZoom Level - https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/6965
* NoSquint - https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/2592

When creating a new DPS should I use sizes offered by InDesign or the display size of the device?

Hello all,
When creating a new DPS, should I use the sizes offered by InDesign or the display size of the device? I ran into this question when I was looking up the sizes of different devices and found that iPhone 5s, iPhone5c, and iPhone4s sizes differ than the defauly dimensions offered by InDesign.
Also, should I worry about the ppi resolution? With iPhone, they all seem to be 326ppi but when dealing with other devices is this something that I should take into consideration? Ideally, I could be creating DPS apps for all devices offered in the Digital Publishing drop down in InDesign (iPhone, iPad, Kindle Fire/Nook, and Android).
Thank you for any help you can provide.
By the way, if it helps I am using InDesign CC.

Using 1024x768 and creating PDF articles will get you OK with both iPad resolutions, and, as Bob L. says, quite decent "one size fits all" result for all other devices.

Windows 8.1 forgets dpi / display size settings for one monitor on almost every reboot

I use TV 32" with 1920x1080 and cintiq 13" with 1920x1080
when I boot my PC the resolution is fine but DPI is wrong.
In smaller monitor It's look like DPI is higher than the bigger one.
I already set dpi to be the same (smallest 100%) but it's not work until I do something to change display setting.
It's really annoy me. This problem is not happen when I use windows 8
Only solution I found is turn off
"Turn on fast start-up".
When I do that It's boot like what I want. every monitor is the same DPI.
But it'll make my boot time longer.
It should be just start up windows and use the same dpi from the start.
So I think this problem is a bug in windows 8.1
Best regards

Thank you for reply.
I've already used the latest graphic card driver. But It's won't help this issue.
In registry editor. I check those variables then value of them is already set like that blog suggest.
So , it look like when windows start-up(with fast start-up) It use something like
suggest value for different monitor size instead of what I set in control panel. But when I turn off fast start-up windows use my setting value.
And I think there are a lot of people who got the same problem as me.
Here is an example.
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1-desktop/windows-81-forgets-dpi-display-size-settings-for/385cb615-d699-47f8-8c12-717e3364c866

My next iMac-- which graphics card; which display size?

Hi all,
I'd like some advice in choosing my next iMac, specifically regarding the graphics card and the display size.
Graphics Card:
I'm not a gamer nor am I doing any 3D animation. Is there any other reason to upgrade the graphics card? I DO want the best possible video playback (QT movies), but I don't know if the graphics card has any bearing on video playback quality.
Display size:
Aside from the obvious differences in resolution, do any of the three displays sizes (17,20,24) have any history of being better or more reliable?
Thanks in advance for any tips

Your needs will better dictate which model is best.
Video playback of QuickTine movies will not be affected by upgrading to the 24" with the nVidia chip.
No 3D gaming or animation means no need for a higher end graphics card. In my case, the x1600 ATi in the original Core Duo 20" is more than sufficient for everything I've thrown at it so far including full resolution "Call of Duty".
For your use, you may not need the extra VRAM but I personally would bump it up to 256MB though. Adding an external monitor will split the total VRAM between the two monitors and with Apple continually moving a lot of Mac OS X's graphical features to the GPU, the extra memory may be a blessing.
Display Size:
I believe that reliability between the three models is pretty much the same.
The advantage to the 24" is, of course, the extra screen real estate and resolution. However The price difference between the 20" and 24" could allow you to go with the 20" model and add an external LCD for a dual screen setup (if space permits).
Weigh your needs - now and the immediate future - and then look at both models in person if possible.

How to set the display size of the PDF - in percent?

Hi, I wonder if anyone knows if it is possible to set
the display size of the PDF document, so that it always
shows in, let´s say 100%, in the viewers browser window?
Much grateful for any help!
/Anni

In Acrobat, under Document Properties (Ctrl+D), you can edit the Initial
View settings, including the zoom level.

How to set display size of a Region or Dynamic Region?

Hi,experts,
In jdev 11.1.2.3,
I drag and drop a task-flow into a jsf page to create a Region,
and set display size for the region, source code as:
===================
<f:facet name="second">
<af:decorativeBox theme="medium" id="db1">
<f:facet name="center">
<af:panelGroupLayout layout="scroll" id="pgl1"
inlineStyle="width:1200px;height:700px;">
<af:region value="#{bindings.trainflow11.regionModel}" id="r1"
inlineStyle="width:1200px;height:700px;"/>
</af:panelGroupLayout>
</f:facet>
</af:decorativeBox>
</f:facet>
=================
But, the Region is only showed a small fraction area on the parent jsf page whenever during design or run time.
How to set display size of a Region or Dynamic Region?
Thanks!

Hi,
the decorative box is supposed to stretch components in the center facet, so at runtime the region should stretch. Can you try with a static region to see if this is an issue with dynamic regions?
Frank

How to set a uniform display size of multiple intermedia image types - wher

I have read "If you want to limit the size of the file that can be uploaded, you can do this as a post generation
step, by adding the maxFileSize property to the <controller> element in the struts-config:
This does not address how to limit the *** display size *** where you have multiple intermedia image types - where the original size is not uniform.
If an image is uploaded where the true image display size is 1024 x 768 - it will display that way in the table/table-form. This will create un-even display size's where previous images sizes where different 384 x 384 and so on.
Is there a way to encode the display size so that *** ALL *** images regardless of their true size are displayed uniformly at least on one dimension (64 x ???)? This is possible when using products such as Dreamweaver or Flash.
BTW - JHS/***JDev*** synergy is truely magnificient!!! Way-To-Go Oracle!!!!!!!!!!! Keep it up!!!!
BG...

Bill,
I did some tests, and was able to reproduce it. The problem is that JHeadstart distinguishes between display types fileDownload and image, but UIX uses the same <media> tag to handle both display types. It will look at runtime whether it must render a hyperlink to download the document, or to render it right away as an image.
To get all images the same size, you can set the display width and height, AND the display type must be set to image.
However, to get the file name used as download link, you must set the FileName attribute AND the display type must be set to "fileDownload" ..
So, to solve your problem, it is easiest to set the displayType to "fileDownload" and set the width and height properties post-generation in the generated UIX page.
In the next release of Jheadstart, we will fix this, and always pick up width, height and fileName settings regardless of the display type.
Note that you should also set the FileName property against the attribute you are using to upload the file.
Steven Davelaar,
JHeadstart Team.

Display Size of the Visual Admininstrator

I have an interesting problem - the display size of the Visual Administrator in one of my Netweaver systems has opened very small - I cannot stretch it any bigger. In all the rest of my systems the Visual Admininstrator opens full screen (we are AIX-UNIX).
I think I can probably solve the problem by rebooting the server but I would like to know if there is any way to control the size of the Visual Admininstrator? Is there a configuration file or something similar?
Thanks
Patrick

Hello Patrick ,
I have no idea how to resize the visual admin.
But the easiest thing to do is to install the visiual admin locally on a windows desktop.
Be shure you have installed jre 1.4.2 on your windows desktop.
Then copy the complete /usr/sap/<SID>/DVEBMGSXX/j2ee/admin
directory to your windows desktop.
Just doubleclick on the go.bat and the visual admin starts.
Create the desired connections and youre finished.
Have fun,
E.ITS-BAsis

Display size 60gb video

hi guys,
i have a question about the display size of the 60gb video ipod. I just notice that there is a black outline around the actual display. I'm not talking about the screen size, but the actual picture that is being displayed. It does not completely cover the screen. so the actual display is smaller than the screen size. Is this normal? I have updated mine with the 1.2 firmware. I don't remember before the update. is it because of the update? thanx

thanks for the fast reply.
ok the black outline is very small. and it did this to all of the display, video, pictures, main menu, etc.
After looking at it again with display and nothing on (black screen) I think it's normal, because when its on blank screen i can see the outline of the actual display.
thanks

Setting Display Size in X

Connecting a laptop to a new 42" Panasonic monitor (TC-L42E60), I found
the display to be blurry.
xrandr shows this line:
HDMI2 connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
Use the same hardware, on my co-worker's older 42" monitor, I see:
HDMI2 connected 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 930mm x 520mm
A physical size of 698mm x 392mm is closer to 32". I assume there is a
problem with the monitor's EDID (the monitor's firmware is up to date).
Does anyone know how to manually set the physical size? I fiddled
around with 'xrandr --fbmm' but to no avail.

Before making changes, I see these two lines in the output of xrandr:
LVDS1 connected 1366x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 277mm x 156mm
HDMI2 connected 1366x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
And this information from Xorg.log:
$ grep monitor /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[225833.747] (**) | |-->Monitor "<default monitor>"
[225833.747] (==) No monitor specified for screen "Default Screen Section".
Using a default monitor configuration.
[225833.763] (II) intel(0): Output LVDS1 has no monitor section
[225833.763] (II) intel(0): Output VGA1 has no monitor section
[225834.294] (II) intel(0): Output HDMI1 has no monitor section
[225834.334] (II) intel(0): Output DP1 has no monitor section
[225834.579] (II) intel(0): Output HDMI2 has no monitor section
[225834.602] (II) intel(0): Output HDMI3 has no monitor section
[225834.640] (II) intel(0): Output DP2 has no monitor section
[225834.680] (II) intel(0): Output DP3 has no monitor section
[225835.499] (II) intel(0): Monitor name: Panasonic-TV
I then created this file:
$ vim /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/90-monitor.conf
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "<default monitor>"
DisplaySize 930 520 # In millimeters
EndSection
I now see this in Xorg.log:
$ grep monitor /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[226022.950] (**) | |-->Monitor "<default monitor>"
[226022.951] (==) No monitor specified for screen "Default Screen Section".
Using a default monitor configuration.
[226022.962] (II) intel(0): Output LVDS1 using monitor section <default monitor>
[226022.963] (II) intel(0): Output VGA1 has no monitor section
[226023.494] (II) intel(0): Output HDMI1 has no monitor section
[226023.534] (II) intel(0): Output DP1 has no monitor section
[226023.779] (II) intel(0): Output HDMI2 has no monitor section
[226023.802] (II) intel(0): Output HDMI3 has no monitor section
[226023.840] (II) intel(0): Output DP2 has no monitor section
[226023.880] (II) intel(0): Output DP3 has no monitor section
[226024.699] (II) intel(0): Monitor name: Panasonic-TV
But in the output of xrandr, I see no change to the display size:
LVDS1 connected 1366x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 277mm x 156mm
HDMI2 connected 1366x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 698mm x 392mm
I understand my laptop screen is LVDS1 but I was hoping to see have a
display size of 930mm x 520mm.
1) Does anyone know how to define HDMI2 in
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/90-monitor.conf ?
2) Does anyone know how to override the DisplaySize?
Maybe if I get '1' to work, '2' will follow, but I figured I'd ask.
-steve

HT3142 Display size is too large on yahoo mail

My display size is too large on yahoo mail page only (page I need and use most). How do I correct it, please?
Changing the display selections from system preferences is not working.

There may be a control within the application you are running Yahoo.
Which browser are you using online to access Yahoo?
In the View menu bar of the open application, there may be a choice
to change the size of the display content in the window itself, check.
Some of these use a keyboard command, should the setting go to
Full Screen, you'd need to know the default or escape combination
of keys to restore the application's window to a standard size. This
kind of inside-application setting is not reflected System Wide.
Since I don't know the browser, (as I have five, each is different)
I can't recommend a keyboard combination to re-size the open
application's view or window setting. They can be non-standard.
But that likely is where you'd have to change it back to normal.
PS: Snow Leopard is Mac OS X 10.6.8.
(Tiger is OS X 10.4.x)
Good luck!

Safari 5 display size?

Every time I open Safari 5 in Windows 7 Professional I have to Zoom in twice to get a suitable display size on my google.com homepage.
Even adjusting the two font sizes in Preferences/Appearance has no apparent effect.
Also, what's the simplest way to return to my homepage?
Thanks, Don

Thank you. I tried that but the pinch feature does not work for some reason. There could be some other problem in my general settings but short of doing a complete reset I looked and tried everything to remedy the problem. I am relatively new to Mac world so maybe I am overlooking some other obvious solution. One thing I did do is to download Opera which seems to work better as far as page display goes. Pinch function works but I cannot make the page stay the smaller size I pinch to, page stretches back to original size the minute I take my fingers off the screen!

Wrong ibook display size

to the forum:
I just purchased a second hand ibook. It came
with Tiger installed and no original system disks.
(The CPU is a 700 MHz PowerPCG3 and there is 640MB
of ram) Although I didn't do much with the machine
under Tiger, everything seemed to be working fine.
In particular, the whole ibook screen was used.
I got the original system disks from Apple and
proceeded with Software Restore. That erased Tiger
and replaced it with earlier system software.
I can boot into system 9 and system 10, BUT
the display (under both systems) is about the size
of the 1984 mac display (surrounded by a large black
border). Otherwise everything is working.
In system 9, the system profiler shows the
display card leading to display(2) which
has a screen size of 640 by 480. The monitor
panel in the control strip shows the
same thing along with "color LCD (1) 1024 by 768".
I don't know why two displays are shown.
In system 10, I can't find anything about the
display size, but it may be at the bottom
of a window I can't see (because of small screen).
Any help would be much appreciated.
Roger Purves
PowerMac G4 1.25 GHz Mac OS X (10.2.x)

You're Welcome Roger!
"... the 10.2.8 combo did help. In OS X 10.2.8, the display is now the right size."
Yippee!
"... booting into System 9 still leads to the small display. Perhaps I should start a new topic in the System 9 forum."
It's been so long since I used OS 9, I couldn't even begin to troubleshoot it!
You're correct, there are some very knowledgeable members in the OS 9 forum, but eww has a handle on it here too.
"...you are running 10.3.9 and 9.2.2 on one of your machines. Can you boot into 9 on that machine? And does Classic run also?"
Yes and yes. But I can't remember the last time I booted into OS 9, or started Classic.
I'm a total OS X junkie. After installing Panther 10.3.x, I never looked back!
I'll take the liberty of anticipating your next question though
My HD is not partitioned.
And Thank You, for extending the courtesy, of awarding in Discussions, as this is not a requirement, nor mandatory, but is much appreciated!
ali b

How do you know the best iMac display size

how do you know the best iMac display size
Only on them fits in the screen window and that makes the font so tiny. The others are too wide or too tall. I usually view at 150 - 200% for vision issues.

You say it's better to do the Media Browser? I'm fairly new to movie, dvd and garage band. How would I go about using the Media Browser instead of straight to iDVD?
Select Your project - go up to Share - Share to Media Browser and as Large (Not HD)
In iDVD select a nice theme - click on Media button - click on Movie - Select Your movie.
NOW - Save as a DiskImage - and test this before burning DVDs - if this Plays OK then either burn the Image by using Disk Util tool (and set down burn-speed to x4) - or burn via iDVD (will take more time)
I want to keep as much quality as I can.
Then don't use iMovie'08 or 09 or 11 - as they all discard every second line resulting in less quality on the DVD. I use iMovie HD6 or FinalCut any version.
Also...I tried to split my project in iMovie...but couldn't find a way. I wound up just making a copy and then deleting out a handful of scenes from the copy...I still have the original at 4:12hrs. Is there a way in iMovie to split a project?
I would make a copy and cut away a bit from the end - calling this Part 1 and from start of the other copy Part 2.
OR - there are other programs that can squees in more to a DVD e.g. Roxio Toast™ - BUT this has two cons.
• It costs - to me it was well spent mony as it can so much more e.g. back engineer a DVD to an editable form
• Squeesing in more on a DVD - costs in QUALITY - and as You want as much as it can be - then 90 minuts portions encoded with Pro-Quality encoding and full quality interlasced material from a video-editor that delivers this is the way to get 100% of what DVDs can do.
DVD is as standard only SD-Video - HD not possibly. Then You need Blu-Ray. (also Roxio Toast™)
Yours Bengt W

Display size in fullScreenMode

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for