Display Source System Name in Process Chain Email

We would like to show the source system name (QA, Prod, etc) in the email subject when process chain messages are emailed so we can easily discern between production messages and messages from our test system. There doesn't appear to be a straightforward way to do this.
I have seen a Re: Howto Insert System ID into Process Chain Email Message which discussed this topic and offered 2 potential solutions neither of which work for us:
1. Open the production system and modify the messsage directly in the production system
2. Edit the First & Last Name of the sending user in the production system (does not work for us because we use central user administration)
Can anyone suggest another method of accomplishing this requirement?

we achieved it by changing text of [email protected] from 'BIWREMOTE' to BIP BIWREMOTE'....so in our mails even though mail id is same, but it display it for us as BIP.
Just go for user BIWREMOTE, and change format field with whatever name you wanna recieve mail. It should work properly.

Similar Messages

  • Calling an ABAP Program from source system in a process chain

    Hi,
    I need to call an ABAP program (Extract program RMBWV308) from R/3 within a Process Chain in BW 3.5
    Your urgent advice please

    Hi,
    check the following link:
    Start an ABAP program in R/3 from a process chain in BW
    regards,
    raju

  • Change source system name in variant in BWQ

    Hi Gurus,
    I created a process chain for global seetings for unit of measurement and fiscal year variants and transported to BWQ.
    In BWQ, I found the source system name in variant is showing ERD source system name, but I need to change it to ERQ source system name. Any advice how to change source system name in variant in BWQ I would appreciate it.
    Thanks
    Liza

    Hello Again Liza...
    I had the same problem but I didn't need to include in process chain...
    So to execute periodically you can change it in debug mode, not the best solution...
    But since you need to use it in a process chain, you should copy that program to one of yours Z.
    Do this:
    Go to transaction se38 and insert the program name "RSIMPCUST".
    Click on the button of "Copy" (Ctrl+F5).
    Change the source program name to ZRSIMPCUST (or whatever you want)
    Click Enter
    Click the button to mark everything (F8)
    Click Enter
    On the next window of the name of the include click enter (leave it blank)
    Click on the button Change of your Source Code
    In line number 54 you'll find this in Selection Screen part:
    PARAMETERS:  logsys  TYPE rsa_logsys MODIF ID p01.
    PARAMETERS: logsysnm LIKE tbdlst-stext MODIF ID p02.
    Delete those two lines and insert this ones:
    PARAMETERS:  logsys  TYPE rsa_logsys.
    PARAMETERS: logsysnm LIKE tbdlst-stext.
    Now click on Activate button (Ctrl+F3)
    Now you have a new program just like the old one but you can change the source system to whatever you want!
    Please assign points,
    Diogo.

  • Conversion of Source system name after transport

    Dear All,
    I need one clarification.
    Say you have developed a fresh modelling in BW Dev server and your source system is R3 dev system. Now you need to transport all the request  to BW Quality system but the source system will be R/3 quality system.
    For this change of source system name we need to maintain some mappings.... From Tools menu there is an option to do this...
    My doubt is in Production server how do we maintain the mapping...
    Quality system ---> Production
    or
    Development system---->Production.
    Hope i am clear....
    Thanks &  Regards,
    Anup

    Hello Anup,
    The question you raised particularly is about the change of source system when your transports are alredy done. For this, i would like to say is that when you do any transports in the R/3 or BW front, the source system change is done only when :
    1. It is done, when you have a single base system and different R/3 (source system)
    2. If you have a single source (R/3) and a single destination (BW Quality), you do not need to map the source system.
    Well, i case that is needed, you may do it via :
    1. Go to RSA1
    2. Go to Tools.
    3. Tools -> Conversion of source system.
    In the right most table column, provide the source system you need to connect with your BW system.
    This will internally connect you with the specified R/3 system.
    Hope it helps!
    Neha.

  • Conversion of source system names

    Hello Experts,
    After having some transport problem (transporting infopackages), I notice that the source system mapping is not the same in DEV compared to PRD.
    Other than change log which was not turned on, is there any other way I can find out who or when was the last change to this mapping table?
    Am I right to say the mapping entries should exist in all systems? My DEV currently only has 1 entry compared to 6 entries in QAS and PRD.
    The source system underwhich the infopackage resides is not shown in the DEV source system mapping table.
    Is this the cause of my transport problem?
    Regards,
    Mirella Russo

    Dear Experts,
    Thanks for the useful information. Points awarded.
    Am I right to say that mapping in target system cannot be transported and is set directly in target system QAS, PRD via RSA1 and no mapping is required even if there are other source systems, like flat file source systems, when the source system name is to be the same in all systems? In this case, my source system is a flatfile. Does this mean I need not maintain it? The 'no mapping' warning received in transport log shows that the flatfile source system concerned exists in the target system but no mapping. As I do not need source system name change, can I say I need not maintain in the mapping table? I still cannot understand why the error come about.
    Many thank you in advance.
    Regards,
    Mirella Russo

  • "Conversion of Source System names after the transport" : O

    Experts:
    Environment : BI 7.0 and SP 12
    <b>Tranports related to transformation rules are failing with inactive status...</b>
    Further investigation on this, I have noticed that in our QA system, where "Conversion of Source System names after the transport" : O screen, we have columns
    Original Source System, Target Source System, 7.0, Description(I guess, since no name is found)
    Everything looks fine to me with reference to actual techinical names of source/target system...
    My question there is a check box on column "7.0", which is UNCHECKED. Is this correct?
    My understanding is that, this check box needs to be CHECKED, since this is related " Only Valid for RSDS, TRFN and DTPA Objects ". Is this correct?
    If yes, Can I check this box in QA system, save and retransport my requests. If so, what happens to standard BW objects i.e., transfer ruels, update rules etc...
    OR do i need to create another entry with same source/target system and check the 7.0 box.
    OR do i need to create 3 entries with same source/target system and check 7.0 box for each entry i.e., RSDS, TRFN, DTPA.
    Finally, please advise the exact steps that need to be taken here...pros and cons
    Your inputs will be of great help....
    Thanks,
    BI
    Message was edited by:
            B I

    Hi,
       Yes you need to check the checkbox as it is related to Data sources and transformation and DTPs. you can mark the check box if  your client is modifiable, if not you need to transport the setting from DEV. Go to
    SPRO > Business Intelligence>Transport Settings--> Change Source system name after transport.
    you also need to maintain the Source system IDs .
    Hope it helps.

  • Conversion of source system names after transport

    Hi gurus,
    Please someone can tell me how to configure the "conversion of source system names after transport"  in the BI system as my transport is not working on a new BI System  ?
    Thx in advance

    Hi Firmin,
    You can do this in RSA1 in tools under conversion of logical source system names.
    Here you maintain the development system or the system used for development as the source system.
    You will have to mention the logical name of the development system.
    In the target system column mention the system in which the transports would be imported. This could be the quality system or the production system.Again you would have to mention the logical system name
    Check the folllowing link for more informationn on this.
    [Conversion of logical names|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/46/94b1fc87bd13eae10000000a155369/content.htm]
    Hope it helps you ,
    Best regards,
    Sunmit.

  • Conversion of source system names --- error in transport

    hi
    i want to transport my object from Dev111 to Quality222
    but the transport ended up in error 8
    it gave the error...
    Source system PRODUCTION333 does not exist
    I am confused,
    shouldnot it should give error related to Quality system ???
    how should be the mapping in Source system names?
    after research it seems it should be maintained in
    RSA1-TOOLS-mapping of SOURCE SYSTEM NAMES.
    i have following systems...
    BW- DEV111 QUTY222  PDN333
    R3   DEV121  QUTY242 PDN363
    What should the entries look like in which system

    Landscape is -Transport should be send from Deve-Quality---Production
    BW....................................
    DEV111 QUTY222 PDN333
    R3.....................................
    DEV121 QUTY242 PDN363
    CAN you advise if the entries SHOULD look like below in Quality and Production System???
    Quality system should have entries like:
    bw DEV111.............. bw Quality 222
    r3 DEV121................ bw Quality222
    Production system should have entries like:
    bw Quality222.............. bw Production333
    r3 DEV242................ bw Production333
    Q1 ......IS THIS HOW ENTRIES SHOULD BE IN Quality & Production system???

  • System Master Data Process Chain

    Hello Guys,
    I am working on Admin cockpit. So far it s going well. However, I am struglling with scheduling System Master Data Process chain. When I look at its logs, I see that Operation Type (WHM)- Texts becomes red and Attribute Change Run (final step) has not finished yet(almost three hours) Please help.
    Thank you,
    OLGA

    refer this..similar issue is discussed Alpha Conversion
    Non Alpha Compliant Value..hw can this be resolved on BI 7.0 SP 13

  • Mapping of Source System Names

    Hello,
    Has some body done the mapping of Source System for <b>"Transport"</b> to go through which is done using the following steps:
    RSA1 --> Tools --> Mapping of Source System Names(Conversion of source system name after transport)
    You have to enter the source system name and target source source.
    So if I have following Landscape
    1) R3DEV  -> R3QA --> R3QPROD --> R3Prod
    2) BWDEV  -> BWQA  --> BWQPROD --> BWPROD.
    What should be entries in the table
      OrSource           TargSrceSy
    1) R3DEV             R3QA
    2) R3DEV             R3QPROD
    3) R3DEV             R3Prod
    4) BWDDEV            BWQA
    Thanks,
    -Hari
    5) BWDDEV            BWQPROD
    6) BWDDEV            BWPROD
    or
    1) R3DEV             R3QA
    2) R3QA              R3QPROD
    3) R3QPROD           R3Prod
    4) BWDDEV            BWQA
    5) BWQA              BWQPROD
    6) BWQPROD           BWPROD

    Thanks A.H.P. So just a click clarification. My question is
    So BWQPROD will contian
    <b>OrSource     TargSrceSy</b>
       R3DEV        R3QPROD
    <b>OR</b>  
       R3QA          R3QPROD.
    Because my basis the transport path is as shown below.
       R3DEV --> R3QA
       R3DEV --> R3QRPOD
       R3DEV --> R3PROD
    So dev will transport to QA,QPROD,PROD
    Thanks,
    -Hari

  • Process Chain - Email Messaging

    Hi Gurus,
    We have implemented the Process chain with Email messages (Success or Failure). We are getting the entire log message of the process chain instead of just 1 line message (Load of 0FIAP is success).
    Is there a way to suppress the message when it send the email.
    Please advise.
    Thanks. Gowda.

    I personally like to receive all of that data if I need to look at it.  So, what I do instead is have a meaningful header/title for the message.  Something like <system>: <success/fail>: <chain name>.
    So, if I was in production (system BWP), with chain ZBW_MASTER_DATA and it ran successfully, I would see an e-mail titled:
    BWP: Success: ZBW_MASTER_DATA.
    With this, I know the message came from BWP, the chain ran successfully and it was ZBW_MASTER_DATA.
    No need to look at the message at all.   Unless I received BWP: Fail: ZBW_MASTER_DATA!
    Sorry, I didn't answer your question, but I hope I made your life easier in the long run!
    Brian

  • System command in Process chain

    Hello,
    I have a system command in the process chain which points to a command file that is supposed to run. My problem is that when I transport the PC, the path on the system command remains same.
    I want it to change the path from /md.... in dev to /mq... in QA and /ma... in PROD.
    Is there anyway to automate this process? Right now i have to keep track of it and change the system command in each system. I have missed a couple and it creates some problems.
    Thanks
    Sam

    Hello Sam,
    One way to solve this is to work this with your UNIX administrator.  You can do the following:
    1) Create a symbolic link in your dev, qa, and prod which points to the correct directory.
    For example, in dev, you can do the following:
    link -s <whatever new name here, e.g. target>  /md
    In QA, you can do the following:
    link -s <whatever new name here, e.g. target>  /mq
    and so on..
    2) Instead of using the /md, /mq directories, you can use the symbolic directory instead in your system commands.
    e.g.   ls -l /target   instead of ls -l /md
    This might not help you a lot now but it will make things easier in the future because you will know that the symbolic link points to the correct directory of whatever box.
    Hope this helps.

  • Incorrect Source System name after System Copy

    Hello Friends,
      When we copied Source system  from Production  to our  Qulaity  system,   the DTP s are still displaying Production Source system.
    We are in BI7.0 SP13 . I have run TC BDLS to convert Old Source system to new Source system.
    But still displaying  Old source system .
    Please help me with this Issue .
    Any advice appreciated .
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Take a look at OSS notes below.
    o 184447 Building a BW-system landscape
    o 121163 BDLS: Converting logical system names
    o 369758 BDLS: New functions and better performance
    o 524554 Storing destinations in the BW environment
    o 325470 Activities after client copy in BW source systems
    o 538052 Maintenance of Myself destination in BW
    o 305527 Details for correct BW Source System Connection
    o 325525 Copying and renaming systems in a BW environment
    o 184971 Notes on BW source system connections
    o 184754 Procedure after BW database copy
    o 305527 Details for correct BW Source System Connection
    o 547314 FAQ: System Copy procedure
    o 140276 Error in source system assignment
    Regards.

  • New system, problems in process chain

    Hi,
    Recently we made a copy from Prod system to new one. The copy was successfully and the connection with the R/3 system too. But when I try to execute a process chain, I receive the following message: Job BI_PROCESS_CHAIN could not be scheduled. Termination with returncode 8
    and the system log shows:
    BP_STEPLIST_EDITOR: Invalid step values (step 1 ) found. Reason
    > User RFCUSER cannot be scheduled due to its type
    BP_JOB_EDITOR: Job BI_PROCESS_CHAIN is invalid. Reason:
    > Step 1 contains illegal values
    As I see, the problem is with RFCUSER (communications user) but I don't know what can be?
    I will appreciate your help
    regards,
    victoria

    Check <a href="https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/947690">SAP Note 947690</a>
    <b>Reason and Prerequisites</b>
    1. The user type of background user is incorrect.
    2. Invalid host name setting.
    3. Server name spelt wrong or wrong case-sensitivity for server name in sm51.
    4. Process chain scheduled to run on a server which does not exist.
    5. No instance is defined but the operation mode is set in sm63..
    <b>Solution</b>
    1. Set the background user profile according to note 511475.
    2. Check the host name setting in sm65 and correct if necessary (refer note 23538).
    3. Check the server settings in sm51 i.e., check for the spelling and correct case.
    4. Schedule the chain with a valid server.
    5. Maintain an instance of operation mode in rz04
    Assign points if helpful
    Regards, Uday Pothireddy

  • Displaying an audit through a process chain message

    Does anyone know the best and cleanest practice for writing an audit either via spool or job log within a BW Process chain.
    I have 2 itabs in which I'm comparing and I need to email the results and specific data rows during a failure to specific users.  This audit is taking place after data is loaded into the new table (40 table) and before activiation.
    Thanks for any help.

    Hi,
    Create a program like below,
    CALL FUNCTION 'BP_EVENT_RAISE'
      EXPORTING
        EVENTID = 'EVENT WHICH YOU HAVE CREATED'
    EXCEPTIONS
       BAD_EVENTID                  = 1
       EVENTID_DOES_NOT_EXIST       = 2
       EVENTID_MISSING              = 3
       RAISE_FAILED                 = 4
       OTHERS                       = 5
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
    MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
             WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
    ENDIF.
    search and include the program name which you have created above in the "ABAP program" process type which you are going to include in the process chain.
    Include the event which you have created in the start condition of the job.
    Note: No need of give any variant, because here we are calling only one function in this program.
    Regards,
    Sridevi.

Maybe you are looking for