Dissociate an end user with the primary device

I need to "Enable Mobily" for a new hire and I need to select his phone as the primary device. However, I run into this error: "Update failed. Device is already associated with another End User as Primary device"
Is there a way to dissociate the old end user with the primary device? As a last report solution, do you think that by deleting the phone off the CUCM, it will fix the issue when I add the phone back to CUCM?
Many thanks!
-Calin

Thank you George for your prompt response. :) 
How would you "hunt down the other user" in order to make sure the phone is not associated with that particular user. We have about 3000 phones.
I checked the phone settings under "Device" - "Phone" and there is no user under "Owner User ID". Although, I think that this field "Owner User ID" is not connected in any way  to Extension Mobility.
Thanks!
-Calin

Similar Messages

  • Query listing primary user and the primary device

    Is there a query to list the primary device and the primary user associated with that device. Coming from a LANDesk environment I was able to create reports and queries that would list this information pretty easily. I can't seem to link the two in
    SCCM for reporting. Thanks 

    That's a SQL query that should be executed in SQL management studio. It can also be used to create a SRS report.
    Torsten Meringer | http://www.mssccmfaq.de
    Any hints, what it the query itself? And how it should be imported, that it will be created in SRS? Is there any instructions for this? Thanks.

  • If I connect a time capsule via ethernet to an existing internet connection and use it to create a private wifi network for my wireless devices, will other users on the primary network (not the private wifi one) be able to access my files on my TCapsule?

    Like it says in the title basically.
    I want to use a time capsule to store my files and backups and access it from my phone and MacBook Air. However I do not want the others in my house who are currently connected to the same wifi/ethernet router to use my connection or my TC hard drives.
    I had also been thinking about wirelessly extending the wifi network (a linksys N router) but I guess that will allow everyone to access my Time Capsule?
    I hope you guys can help me.
    Regards, Guido

    ......will other users on the primary network (not the private wifi one) be able to access my files on my TCapsule?
    No, if you have not provided them with the Time Capsule device password. 
    Users will be able to "see" the Time Capsule icon under the SHARED heading in the Finder on their Macs, but they will not be able to access the drive or the files.
    I had also been thinking about wirelessly extending the wifi network (a linksys N router) but I guess that will allow everyone to access my Time Capsule?
    Same answer as above.

  • HELP, PLEASE.. I'm looking for a App that I can install on both my iPad and iPhone, then when I load a document, picture, or anything on that app on iPhone or iPad, it will Sync with the other Device so both devices will end up with the same file .

    HELP, PLEASE.. I'm looking for a App that I can install on both my iPad and iPhone, then when I load a document, picture, or anything on that app on iPhone or iPad, it will Sync with the other Device so both devices will end up with the same file ...

    iCloud Drive: https://www.apple.com/icloud/icloud-drive/
    Dropbox: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/dropbox/id327630330?mt=8
    OneDrive: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/onedrive-for-ios/id477537958?mt=8

  • Available Application Deployments with Mandatory Primary Device Deployments

    Hi,
    I am at a client where the overall deployment plan for applications was to use the user-centric model in SCCM 2012.  The users roam from machine to machine and want the apps to be serviceable by the app catalog.  This is easy and has been setup. 
    However, we have been thrown a curve ball and now there is an additional requirement to deploy the users apps as a mandatory deployment to their primary device.  The issue we have seen is that we can't have mandatory deployments and available deployments
    without duplicating a lot of effort.  If we set up a deployment to be required it installs to all machines when they log on to them.  We have also managed to get to the point where we have set-up a mandatory deployment with the requirement set for
    'primary device only', but when you look in Software Center you still see the app, but with a status of failed.  Is there a way of achieving this model - Pre-installs for the user on there primary device on day one and is only available from the catalog
    on all other machines?

    No, it's not possible to create exactly that. The main reason is that you need to deploy something as available to a user to make it appear in the application catalog, but at that moment the requirements of that application are not "checked".
    Those requirements will be "checked" when the user will select to install that specific application. So, basically that will mean that a user will always see the available application in the application catalog.
    My Blog: http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/
    Follow me on twitter: pvanderwoude

  • Multiple profiles/users on the same device

    Hi there,
    I know that iOS is a single user environment.
    But, I am currently working in an enterprise environment and I was wondering if it was possible to have several profiles on the same device, maybe using certificates or so?
    Thanks for your help
    Cheers,
    Pierre.

    It would seem that unlike previous iOS devices the iPad and possibly AppleTV call for the ability to enable multiple profiles/users on the same device.
    I would suggest that if this capability is not on the roadmap for iOS by now then there is a least one place where alternatives to the iPad will have a major advantage.
    The thought they I would have to buy multiple iPads one for myself, my wife and my child because of a software constraint is untenable from a ecological standpoint (all these devices end up as landfill) let alone the economic one.
    Also as I use the iPad I see it's potential to become as important computing platform to me as my laptop eventually surpassing it. In this light I can't see how it could remain just a personal device.

  • How to Use the same iview for both KM End User and the KM Administrator

    Hi friends,
    *This is my scenario :* How to Use the same iview for both KM End User and the KM Administrator but with different Context
    Menu Options.
    i followed these steps but im getting same context menu for both KM End User and the KM Administrator .
    Assign the role Content Administrator to the user km_admin. This is needed so that km_admin can change
    the presentation settings for the KM Folder u201EReports_kmFolder‟.
    Now, login with user km_admin. Navigate to the Km Folder reports_kmFolder through Content Administration
    -> Km Content. Click on Details link of the folder reports_kmFolder.
    Go To Settings -> Presentation. Click on the tab u201ESettings for You‟-> Click on button u201ESelect Profile‟.
    Select the radio button corresponding to u201Elayout Set‟, and choose u201EConsumerExplorer‟ from the dropdown.
    Click u201EOK‟.
    Select both the check boxes corresponding to Items Affected as shown above, and click u201ESave‟
    Now, remove the u201ESuper Administrator‟ role from the user km_admin and login with this user.
    How rto resolve this????
    Regards,
    Prasad.

    Hello Prasad,
    Most likely the user km_admin still has system principal roles assigned, even though you removed the Super Admin role, you should check that this user doesn't have any other admin roles, otherwise it will be considered a System Principal user and will therefore still have access to all content. For more information see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/19/56f28fbd4e11d5993b00508b6b8b11/frameset.htm
    Try creating a new user with just read access to the content and you should see that it will not be able to make any changes etc.
    Regards,
    Lorcan.

  • Multiple users on the same device

    Can I have 2 or more users on the same device? I want to use a Kindle Fire HD when traveling with separate accounts for my wife and myself.

    You can; you just have to disable automatically signing one of you in (unless you want to constantly log the other one out)

  • Two computers and two users with the same name. Can't copy files anymore...

    Hi all, after a user migration to my new iMac I had to make a change of the shortname. I knew it was not a good idea but had no choice otherwise I had to wait other 3 hours to migrate data again...
    Anyway, I managed to change my shortname with success, but one strange thing happened afterwards... I have two macs networked, both have an admin user with the same shortname/real name, 'gillo' (I followed the procedure in one of these two, the Intel iMac. The other, a Powerbook, was not modified).
    While previously I had no problems in copying files from the user 'gillo' on the Powerbook TO the user 'gillo' on the iMac, after the shortname change I'm not anymore able to do it. The error I get is:
    "The operation cannot be completed because you do not have sufficient privileges for some of the items"
    Doesn't matter where I put the files, Desktop, Documents, even the Drop Box, I always get the same error.
    I went through some checks and this is the 'log':
    - The files/folders in the iMac 'gillo' directory are not locked.
    - The files can be copied without troubles to the dirs of another admin user
    - Permissions are the same as the other admin user and owner/group are the correct ones.
    - Both Macs have 10.4.6
    - The 'gillo' user on the iMac can copy files FROM the user 'gillo' on the Powerbook.
    - I repaired permissions and the hard disk booting from the install DVD.
    - I tried to change permissions of the directories (such as Desktop) on the iMac 'gillo' user allowing everybody to read/write. Also a no go.
    Anybody went through this already? Or maybe something similar not directly related to the short name change?

    Actually, everyone missed one point, when a device is priced, the cost of icloud storage space for that device is also included in it that is why they are able to give you 5gb each for each user ID, in nutshell there is nothing free coming with apple device purchase, it is paid for.  What they are trying by giving only 5gb per user ID irrespective of the number of devices used is pure broadlight looting, they take money from you when you buy each device and give you nothing, This is a case of goods and services bought but not fully deliverd ie apple can be suied for discreminatory treatment towards it's users. I wonder why no one tried this yet in America where everyone sue everyone for petty things..... there is no one to take up this issue? . if tim got any love for the guys who shell out money for the devices his company makes, he should be implimenting this as priority before someone wake up from sleep and sue him.

  • How to sync the standby database with the primary?

    Hi..We have dataguard setup for our production databases(10.2.0.3).
    I need one clarification regarding the standby database sync with primary.We identified one of our databases is not in sync with the primary and for longtime the archives are not getting applied at the secondary.
    We decided to take the incremental (from SCN)backup from primary and use that at the standby to resolve the gap as described in the book "Oracle dataguard concepts and administration".
    But, before doing that,we observed couple of structural changes were not applied at the standby(ex:some tablespaces were not created in secondary where as they were there in primary).
    How to apply these changes at the secondary as the standby is in mount state.(Can I open this database and create those tablespaces ?? or do you suggest any other way.
    Thanks for your reply.

    This points to a setup problem. Something missing, a parameter set wrong etc.
    While your question is asking something different - How to correct, I would consider how to prevent. Unless you have a gap or logs not applied you have a deeper issue.
    If you have a gap or logs not applied then correct it and check to see if the missing object are present.
    The key parameters for Oracle 10 are :
    FAL_SERVER=STANDBY
    FAL_CLIENT=PRIMARY
    STANDBY_FILE_MANAGEMENT=AUTO
    DB_FILE_NAME_CONVERT='STANDBY','PRIMARY'
    LOG_FILE_NAME_CONVERT='STANDBY','PRIMARY'
    log_archive_dest_1='LOCATION=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/PRIMARY/archive VALID_FOR=(ALL_LOGFILES,ALL_ROLES) DB_UNIQUE_NAME=PRIMARY'
    log_archive_dest_2='SERVICE=STANDBY LGWR ASYNC VALID_FOR=(ONLINE_LOGFILES,PRIMARY_ROLE) DB_UNIQUE_NAME=STANDBY'
    LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_STATE_1=ENABLE
    LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_STATE_2=ENABLE
    LOG_ARCHIVE_MAX_PROCESSES=30
    Check them on both sides for issues.
    If your standby is really trashed consider using RMAN to duplicate it. You might end up saving time. I have Oracle 11 short notes on this but it will work on Oracle 10 too.
    http://www.visi.com/~mseberg/duprman.html
    Otherwise use statements like this to resolve you gap.
    ALTER DATABASE REGISTER LOGFILE '/u01/app/oracle/oradata/STANDBY/archive/PRIMARY_1_20_716110538.arc';
    ALTER DATABASE REGISTER LOGFILE '/u01/app/oracle/oradata/STANDBY/archive/PRIMARY_1_21_716110538.arc';See Section 5.8 Managing Archive Gaps of oracle document B14239-05
    Best Regards
    mseberg
    CKPT is correct, sorry I missed the Welcome to OTN!
    Edited by: mseberg on Jul 5, 2011 10:34 AM

  • Is it possible to setup multiple users with the exact same calendar?

    I am trying to setup exchange with 3 users where each user sees exactly the same calendar all precisely in sync. I don't need the users to have their own calendar. Sharing a calendar from 1 user to the others does not work for me because I need it to be
    in sync with all the users' mobile devices as well as outlook.
    Thanks

    Hi dneray,
    Base on my knowledge, it is impossible to setup multiple users with the exact same calendar.
    However, as a workaround, you can try to set up a shared mailbox within these users as a shared calendar for them to share.
    Best regards,
    Niko
    Niko Cheng
    TechNet Community Support

  • Could apple send me an iPad air. All my friends are making fun of me because I'm stuck with the old device and no phone. I've had app problems with apple before so I think that it would only be fair to get a newer device. Thank You Apple

    Could apple send me an iPad air. All my friends are making fun of me because I'm stuck with the old device and no phone. I've had app problems with apple before so I think that it would only be fair to get a newer device. Thank You Apple

    First we aren't Apple just normal users just like you.
    Second provide Apple a feedback or send them a mail.
    Third they will never send you a free iPad Air.
    If you want one you have to buy it. (go for refurbished if the device is too expensive) or look for special prices.
    Contact iTunes support if you have a problem with an App.

  • Can´t communicate with the primary DNS Server 200.49.156.5: and now?

    Hi,
    I have connected a Sony Vaio with a Linksys WRT54G router, using broadband cable provided by a Motorola Surfboard Modem (model 5b5100i)
    I followed all the steps from the router´s CD.
    Finally I connected a network cable to the port 1 of the router and on the other extreme the Motorola Modem is now connected. As result, since I  have a desktop already connected to the modem, there are now 2 connections on the back of the motorola modem, 1 for a desktop that uses its USB plug and a 2nd, which uses a network cable (ethernet connection) and that plugs at the end to the Linksys router. connection is ok based on the Linksys CD.
    The wireless card of 2 different laptops recognize the router´s signal, but no internet copnnection is available. 
    after diagnostic on network problems by Vista Windows, I receive the following message
    ¨"Cannot communicate with the primary DNS Server 200.49.156.5"
    What does it mean? what needs to be set in order to make it work?
    Thanks in advance for any help

    I talked to a tech support form my cable company and the motorola only provides 1 IP address, therefore, in order to make a router work (it will need its own IP address, a 2nd one), you need to buy an ADDITIONAL internet connection or access point....this company is in Argentina. While I lived in the US (last month) they allowed me to have multiple computers from the same one connection.
    bottom line, calll your ISP and tell them you need either to install the router on your connection OR to have an additional internet cable input....
    just my 2 cents...business rules.

  • How to find login user with the largest account

    Hello. I'm looking to put together a bash script that can do two things: (1) determine the shortname of the user with the largest account in /Users and (2) look up their full/long name. I'm going to use this script to help identify who the user on a computer and while I know that's possible that a sometime-user may have a larger account than the normal-user on any given computer, the results of a script should be sufficient in most cases for my needs.
    I'm not sure the best way to around this. I know that I can use "du -m -d1 /Users" as root:
    root on torchwood
    [ ~ ]$ du -m -d1 /Users
    157 /Users/admin
    128 /Users/johndoe
    70890 /Users/dancollins
    21746 /Users/Shared
    92920 /Users
    I know that I can also use "dscacheutil -q user" to get a full list of all users on a system.
    How can I get both the short and long name of the user with the largest account in the /Users folder?

    We're running JAMF Recon for inventory and my supervisor wants to create a report that lists the primary user of the Mac... assuming that the largest user account may be the primary user. In this case, disk space is not the issue, the top admins simply would like to be able to associate names with individual machines. This isn't the most elegant way to do it and it's not fool-proof, but it'll be correct more often than not, which they're satisfied with.
    Can I ask one more question? Using your script, I've started testing with one building and on a number of Mac, the "admin" (shortname) account is turning out to be the largest account. Is there a way to exclude the admin account from consideration?
    Thanks...

  • Another user changed the primary key

    am using jdev 11.1.1.5.0-adfbc
    after each and every insert while saving the record
    error throws like this >>>Another user changed the primary key
    what should i do to avoid this?
    <?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
    <BC4JConfig version="11.1" xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/bc4j/configuration">
       <AppModuleConfigBag ApplicationName="com.rits.glm.model.servicesAM.generalLedgerAM">
          <AppModuleConfig DeployPlatform="LOCAL" JDBCName="goodwell" jbo.default.country="IN" jbo.project="com.rits.glm.GeneralLedger" name="generalLedgerAMLocal" ApplicationName="com.rits.glm.model.servicesAM.generalLedgerAM">
             <Database jbo.locking.mode="optimistic"/>
             <Security AppModuleJndiName="com.rits.glm.model.servicesAM.generalLedgerAM"/>
          </AppModuleConfig>
          <AppModuleConfig DeployPlatform="LOCAL" JDBCName="goodwell" jbo.default.country="IN" jbo.project="com.rits.glm.GeneralLedger" name="generalLedgerAMShared" ApplicationName="com.rits.glm.model.servicesAM.generalLedgerAM">
             <AM-Pooling jbo.ampool.dynamicjdbccredentials="false" jbo.ampool.isuseexclusive="false" jbo.ampool.maxpoolsize="1" jbo.ampool.resetnontransactionalstate="false"/>
               <Database jbo.locking.mode="optimistic"/>
             <Security AppModuleJndiName="com.rits.glm.model.servicesAM.generalLedgerAM"/>
          </AppModuleConfig>
       </AppModuleConfigBag>
    </BC4JConfig>

    some suggestions
    JBO-25014: Another user has changed...
    http://adfhowto.blogspot.com/2010/12/troubleshooting-another-user-has.html
    Another user has changed the row with Primary key

Maybe you are looking for