Distributed Cache Mode With W2k8 Enterprise ServerCore ???

Hi, can someone teach me how to configure BranchCache in Distributed Cache Mode with W2k8 Enterprise ServerCore? tks a lot!

Hi,
Since Server Core installation provides a minimal environment for running specific server roles, which reduces the maintenance and management requirements and the attack surface for those server
roles, so the installation process of BranchCache Distributed Cache Mode is the same as the Windows Server 2008 with GUI. Since there isn’t any official document about this, I suggest we could use the following guides as reference.
BranchCache Distributed Cache Mode Step by Step Guide
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=5772
Here are some articles about how to configure a Server Core installation, they may be useful to us.
Configuring a Server Core installation: Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee441257(v=ws.10).aspx
Installing a server role on a server running a Server Core installation of Windows Server 2008: Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee441263(v=ws.10).aspx
Installing Windows Features on a server running a Server Core installation of Windows Server 2008: Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee441259(v=ws.10).aspx
If you face some issue during the configuration, please do not hesitate to let me know, I will be very happy to help.
Best Regards,
Andy Qi
Andy Qi
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

SCCM 2012 R2 Branch Cache - Distributed Cache mode

Hello to all, I understood the process to enabled Branch Cache - Distributed Cache mode in source server and how to enable clients to use it. Fine. I saw a text that states "
BranchCache management is integrated in the Configuration Manager console. For applications, you can configure BranchCache on a deployment type. For programs and software updates, you can configure the BranchCache settings on the deployment.
Does it mean that I also need to configure Branch Chache individually for applications, programs and updates so they can take advantage of it? If positive, how to do this "specific" configuration?
Regards, EEOC.

The BranchCache option is checked by default, so you would only need to disable it for any deployments where you didn't want this functionality.
You can't enable BranchCache for Task Sequences though - but we have a script for that :-)
http://2pintsoftware.com/branchcache-enable-task-sequences-sccm/
Phil Wilcock http://2pintsoftware.com @2pintsoftware

Standalone app distributed via email with apple enterprise?

We've successfully built a DPS single edition "app" and are running it on our local ipads via UDID authentication.
My questions is, if we have an apple "enterprise" developer account, can we distribute the app via email without the UDID authentication? I've found instructions on how to build a "Viewer" app via this route, however I havent found anything regarding a single edition app.
here is the link to the "viewer" app process.
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/digitalpublishingsuite/articles/distributing-enterprise-ios-vi ewer-apps.html
thanks!

I don't think so. I think you need to create the viewer app and then
allow the downloads from there, but I am not 100% sure of that so hang
out and wait for someone with a bit more knowledge of the subject.
Bob

Distributed Cache synchronization with JMS

Hello,
The documentation on Cache Synchronization using JMS lists steps to setting up JMS in the JMSClusteringService but does not list steps as to how to connect or setup connections to the various different servers inorder to synchronize between them. It lists steps for connecting to servers when using RMI but not JMS. Appreciate any additional documentation on doing this in JMS. Many thanks

JMS, by its nature, provides the connections between the different 'servers'. If all servers connect to the same JMS service then there are no additional actions required to have the 'servers' synchronize.
--Gordon

Calendar tracking not consistant when meetings booked by delegate in cached mode

Situation:
Exchange 2010 Sp3
Outlook 2010 SP1 Cached mode, with delegate having full access to manager's mailbox with auto mapping on.
Whe the delaget books a meeting in the managers callander. Some of the response are not relected in the tracking on the meeting. The patern is that everybody who responded quickly are not reflected, but at some point the responses start being
reflected in the tracking.
I think that the issue is that when some of the responses start coming in, the meeting has not yet been synced to the owners mailbox. When the reponse comes in, there is no meeting object to update, so it gets ignored. When the calendar oject
finally gets synced the response that come in from that point , are processed and get reflected in the tracking. this is particularly obvious for meeting rooms, since our rooms are setup to auto-accept and they response within seconds.
I have tried changing the Cache setting, to not cache shared data, this way when the delegate works in the Manager's calender the change are happening directly in the Mailbox. With this configuration all the meeting response are getting processed.
I can use this workaround for some people but we do have some admins that want to cache the manager's mailbox/Calendar for viewing offline so I also need to find a solution for them.
Thanks
Marc

It is the default behavior, but it also causes many undesired issues. For instance, consider the following:
If I have a small mailbox, but I have several large shared mailboxes, when I create a profile, those shared mailboxes are added to my OST. In your estimation, this is all well-and-good. However, I work for a bank - we have many slow WAN connections
(one for each branch), and a large number of users across these connections. If you download one large shared mailbox to your workstation, you will swamp the network connection for a very long period (we've had WAN outages caused by shared mailboxes
that lasted most of a day). Add to this the fact that our tellers do not use the same computer daily, each time they go to a different computer, the cache needs to be totally refreshed.
I have C*Os in this company who have many admins responsible for their Calendar and Inbox. These admins aren't always able to communicate before scheduling meetings. Let's consider your situation - the C*O calendar is updated in real time when
changes are made. Those up-dates are still not replicated real time to the delegates, so even in your best case, they will still not be up to date when they schedule meetings. (And considering the current operation, they are as much as 15 minutes
behind if they all cache the C*O mailbox.)
We have many shared mailboxes in our organization. Some of these have many users who have full access. We have found several issues if these people cache the shared mailbox, such as:
Many times, these users will open an item to work on it, which marks the message as read so others will by-pass it. We had one group who had six responses to a message because six separate users opened the message and responded. After all, the
message showed as unread in their cache.
Folders created in the shared mailbox aren't visible to the other users, and may never appear (we've tried forcing folder updates as well as forced replication and nothing causes these new folders to appear).
Users commonly move items to sub-folders within the mailbox. With cache enabled, we've had ticket opened because one person moved a message to their folder, but someone else moved it to their folder. Since all were working from cache, the last
cache to update won this contest.
And finally, we have found that while Outlook does a good job of ensuring the cache of the primary mailbox is up-to-date, it doesn't update the shared mailboxes as readily if the workstation is busy, which for our exec admins is most of the time.
So the cache for the admins of our senior execs (which as I said above are multiple) was rarely updated on a timely basis. And all of these admins are working on high-speed connections to the server, so it's not a WAN issue in these instances.
Turning off "Download shared folders" fixed all of these issues at the minor expense of taking longer to open items in the secondary mailboxes.

Cache config for distributed cache and TCP*Extend

Hi,
I want to use distributed cache with TCP*Extend. We have defined "remote-cache-scheme" as the default cache scheme. I want to use a distributed cache along with a cache-store. The configuration I used for my scheme was
<distributed-scheme>
<scheme-name>MyScheme</scheme-name>
<backing-map-scheme>
    <read-write-backing-map-scheme>
      <internal-cache-scheme>
        <class-scheme>
          <class-name>com.tangosol.util.ObservableHashMap</class-name>
        </class-scheme>
      </internal-cache-scheme>
      <cachestore-scheme>
        <class-scheme>
          <class-name>MyCacheStore</class-name>
        </class-scheme>
        <remote-cache-scheme>
          <scheme-ref>default-scheme</scheme-ref>
        </remote-cache-scheme>
      </cachestore-scheme>
      <rollback-cachestore-failures>true</rollback-cachestore-failures>
    </read-write-backing-map-scheme>
</backing-map-scheme>
</distributed-scheme>
<remote-cache-scheme>
<scheme-name>default-scheme</scheme-name>
<initiator-config>
    <tcp-initiator>
      <remote-addresses>
        <socket-address>
          <address>XYZ</address>
          <port>9909</port>
        </socket-address>
      </remote-addresses>
    </tcp-initiator>
</initiator-config>
</remote-cache-scheme>I know that the configuration defined for "MyScheme" is wrong but I do not know how to configure "MyScheme" correctly to make my distributed cache the part of the same cluster to which all other caches, which uses the default scheme, are joined. Currently, this ain't happening.
Thanks.
RG
Message was edited by:
user602943

Hi,
Is it that I need to define my distributed scheme with the CacheStore in the server-coherence-cache-config.xml and then on the client side use remote cache scheme to connect to get my distributed cache?
Thanks,

Can Outlook 2013 cached mode disabled work offline?

Hello
I would like to please someone help me to resolve a concern. I have a client Outlook 2013 cache mode disabled by policy, however when you need to open Outlook without connecting to any network, is not possible and a message that the server is not online.
Is there a way to change this behavior and that an Outlook client that has disabled the cache can work offline?
Many thanks

Hi
No, that is what cached mode is used for.
You can use OWA offline if you are disabling cache mode with policy.

Using Tangosol Coherence in conjunction with Kodo JDO for distributing caching

JDO currently has a perception problem in terms of performance. Transparent
persistence is perceived to have a significant performance overhead compared
to hand-coded JDBC. That was certainly true a while ago, when the first JDO
implementations were evaluated. They typically performed about half as well
and with higher resource requirements. No doubt JDO vendors have closed that
gap by caching PreparedStatements, queries, data, and by using other
optimizations.
Aside from the ease of programming through transparent persistence, I
believe that using JDO in conjunction with distributed caching techniques in
a J2EE managed environment has the opportunity to transparently give
scalability, performance, and availability improvements that would otherwise
be much more difficult to realize through other persistence techniques.
In particular, it looks like Tangosol is doing a lot of good work in the
area of distributed caching for J2EE. For example, executing parallelized
searches in a cluster is a capability that is pretty unique and potentially
very valuable to many applications. It would appear to me to be a lot of
synergy between Kodo JDO and Tangosol Coherence. Using Coherence as an
implementation of Kodo JDO's distributed cache would be a natural desire for
enterprise applications that have J2EE clustering requirements for high
scalability, performance, and availability.
I'm wondering if Solarmetric has any ideas or plans for closer integration
(e.g., pluggability) of Tangosol Coherence into Kodo JDO. This is just my
personal opinion, but I think a partnership between your two organizations
to do this integration would be mutually advantageous, and it would
potentially be very attractive to your customers.
Ben

Marc,
Thanks for pointing that out. That is truly excellent!
Ben
"Marc Prud'hommeaux" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Ben-
We do currently have a plug-in for backing our data cache with a
Tangosol cache.
See: http://docs.solarmetric.com/manual.html#datastore_cache_config
In article <[email protected]>, Ben Eng wrote:
JDO currently has a perception problem in terms of performance.
Transparent
persistence is perceived to have a significant performance overheadcompared
to hand-coded JDBC. That was certainly true a while ago, when the firstJDO
implementations were evaluated. They typically performed about half aswell
and with higher resource requirements. No doubt JDO vendors have closedthat
gap by caching PreparedStatements, queries, data, and by using other
optimizations.
Aside from the ease of programming through transparent persistence, I
believe that using JDO in conjunction with distributed cachingtechniques in
a J2EE managed environment has the opportunity to transparently give
scalability, performance, and availability improvements that wouldotherwise
be much more difficult to realize through other persistence techniques.
In particular, it looks like Tangosol is doing a lot of good work in the
area of distributed caching for J2EE. For example, executingparallelized
searches in a cluster is a capability that is pretty unique andpotentially
very valuable to many applications. It would appear to me to be a lot of
synergy between Kodo JDO and Tangosol Coherence. Using Coherence as an
implementation of Kodo JDO's distributed cache would be a natural desirefor
enterprise applications that have J2EE clustering requirements for high
scalability, performance, and availability.
I'm wondering if Solarmetric has any ideas or plans for closerintegration
(e.g., pluggability) of Tangosol Coherence into Kodo JDO. This is justmy
personal opinion, but I think a partnership between your twoorganizations
to do this integration would be mutually advantageous, and it would
potentially be very attractive to your customers.
Ben--
Marc Prud'hommeaux [email protected]
SolarMetric Inc. http://www.solarmetric.com

Exchange 2010 all mail clients with internal cached and internal non-cached mode users having connection status issues, login prompt -- external is fine either way

Hello,
I'm seeing an issue that started this past Monday with no recent change to our environment.
External Outlook Anywhere users and Mobile users, OWA users are unaffected.
Internal Users are affected when using Outlook of any version, 2010 or 2013.
-Internal Users normally log into their workstation with their ad credentials, domain joined machines. Outlook opens without credentials prompting ideally.
1 . Using Cached Mode:
a. Login Prompts, slowness - Since Monday, users are getting prompted to login. The prompt goes away after logging in at startup. It is also causing high CPU
on the workstations.
b. Free/Busy, Out of Office doesn't work. I can, however complete auto-setup for a new user, so autodiscover is not completely down for internal users.
c. Checking Connection Status shows connecting status on highlighted entry below without ever establishing connection (just goes away).
The outlook icon in the system tray says "Outlook is requesting data from the server":
2. Using Non-cached mode
a. No Login Prompt at startup, business as usual
b. Free/Busy, Out of Office works fine. Autodiscover is fine.
c. Checking Connection Status shows normal except, it has "casarray URL, then status is referral" it seams to flicker this constantly then go away intermittently.
d. Main issue in non-cached mode is, sometimes a user will log into windows, open outlook and it will not open and says "server is unavailable. Retry, work offline, or cancel" I can try re-opening, same message.
Only after logging out of windows, logging back in, I can get back into outlook. This is not every time, or consistent with specific users, but random.
3. Lync Pop up for credentials often, though entering the password.
URLs are correct. Autodiscover, EWS, etc.
Already tried bypassing our loadmaster load balancer with host files on clients. same issue regardless of casarray node.
Not sure what is going on.
Josh

You have a hybrid configuration with Office 365, right? You didn't provide this valuable piece of information.
In Exchange Online PowerShell run this command:
Get-OrganizationConfig | FL PublicFoldersEnabled
If the value is "Remote" then users with Exchange Online mailboxes are looking to on-premises public folders. Be sure that you have legacy pubic folder interoperability properly configured.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn249373(v=exchg.150).aspx
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Send As not working with cached mode enabled

Hi
I am having some issues using Send As. We are running Exchange 2010 Version 14.2 (Build 247.5) and Outlook 2013.
I have done the following:
1. created a mailbox user
2. created a security group and added my own account
3. added the security group with Send As permission through ADUC on the mailbox user
4. Waited a day and tried to send as the mailbox user, but it fails
If I disable cached mode or use OWA it works perfectly. The mailbox is NOT hidden in the address list.
I have seen this behavior before, but can't remember the "fix"?
Lasse
/Lasse

Hi,
From your description, the send as permission works well via OWA or Exchange online mode, the send as permission is configured successfully. The issue is related to Outlook side, in your case, I recommend you create a new profile and check the result.
Hope this can be helpful to you.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

High-units reflect twice the amount with dual JVM's in a distributed cache

HI all,
I have a question - i have a near cache scheme defined - running 4 JVM's with my application deployed to it (localstorage=false) - and 2 JVM's for the distributed cache (localstorage=true)
The high-units is set to 2000 - but the cache is allowing 4000. Is this b/c each JVM will allow for 2000 high-units each?
I was under the impression that as long as coherence is running in the same multi-cast address and port - that the total high-units would be 2000 not 4000.
Thanks...

user644269 wrote:
HI all,
I have a question - i have a near cache scheme defined - running 4 JVM's with my application deployed to it (localstorage=false) - and 2 JVM's for the distributed cache (localstorage=true)
The high-units is set to 2000 - but the cache is allowing 4000. Is this b/c each JVM will allow for 2000 high-units each?
I was under the impression that as long as coherence is running in the same multi-cast address and port - that the total high-units would be 2000 not 4000.
Thanks...Hi,
the high-unit setting is per-backing map, so in your case it means 2000 units per storage-enabled nodes.
From 3.5 it will become a bit more complex with the partition aware backing maps.
Best regards,
Robert

Distributed cache with a backing-map as another distributed cache

Hi All,
Is it possible to create a distributed cache with a backing-map-schem with another distributed cache with local-storage disabled ?
Please let me know how to configure this type of cache.
regards
S

Hi Cameron,
I am trying to create a distributed-schem with a backing-map schem. is it possible to configure another distributed queue as a backing map scheme for a cache.
<distributed-scheme>
     <scheme-name>MyDistCache-2</scheme-name>
     <service-name> MyDistCacheService-2</service-name>
     <backing-map-scheme>
               <external-scheme>
                    <scheme-name>MyDistCache-3</scheme-name>
               </external-scheme>
     </backing-map-scheme>
</distributed-scheme>
     <distributed-scheme>
          <scheme-name>MyDistCache-3</scheme-name>
          <service-name> MyDistBackCacheService-3</service-name>
          <local-storage>false</local-storage>
     </distributed-scheme>
Please correct my understanding.
Regards
Srini

Missing Body from a Appointment with deactivated Cache Mode in Outlook 2013

Hello,
i am not shure if is this more a Bug/Configuration Problem in Outlook 2013 or do i have something to consider?
I have a Problem with created Appointments through EWSMA when the Outlook 2013 Client has deactivated the Cache Mode.
With activated Cache Mode the Appointment is shown up normal in Outlook 2013 Client.
With deactivated Cache Mode the Body of the Appointment are missing.
When i look at the Appointment through OWA the Body is there.
This only happend to Appointments created through EWSMA.
I use Outlook 2013 (15.0.4615.1000) MSO (15.0.4615.1000) 32 bit and Exchange Server Version 15.0 (Build 913.22) (CU5).
Best Regards

Maybe this bug?
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/88e78151-088b-4a2f-9a4d-003be7323ae9/e2013ewsxmlewstool-calendar-item-body-not-visible-in-outlook?forum=exchangesvrdevelopment

Outlook 2010 stops receving new emails when in cached mode

User has an Outlook 2010 issue that has been called in on NUMEROUS internal helpdesk tickets and has never been resolved. What happens is several times a week his Outlook 2010 client on his Windows 7 SP1 laptop will stop synchronizing
new messages from Exchange 2010 (not sure exact build/version). His admin assistant still gets his new messages in her Outlook 2007 SP3 client (as his delegate) and he still gets new messages on his iPhone via Good GMM. If he logs in to Outlook
Web Access all his messages are there.
We already tried toggling Cached Exchange mode off and back on several times, the problem still returns whenever in cached mode.
We already tried deleting the outlook.ost file and letting it rebuild several times, the problem still returns.
We already tried deleting the entire Outlook profile and letting it rebuild several times, the problem still returns.
We already tried deleting the entire Windows user profile and letting it rebuild several times, the problem still returns.
We even gave him a whole new laptop, the problem still returned.
Problem started with Outlook 2007, upgraded to 2010, problem returned.
Seems to happen more often when the laptop resumes from sleep, but not always.
Most add-ins are disabled except for McAfee and a few other essential Microsoft ones.
He does not have ANY rules or alerts set, none at all.
He does not have any other mailboxes or shared calendars in Outlook and RSS feeds are off.
He does have 8 PST files and several of them are quite large (three are 2GB each, one is 4 GB).
MCITP:Enterprise Admin (Vista/2008), MCSA/MCSE (2003/XP), MCDBA (2000)

Hi Smitty,
If change other user account on his laptop, and use outlook cache mode, is there the same issue?
If not, I recommend you try to move this mailbox to another database, and check the result.
Best regards,
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

Problem with the Enterprise version of Adobe Reader 10.1.3

I tried deploying the 10.1.3 in the way I successfully deployed 1.1 and 1.2, but kept getting errors about a transform on install. I tried installing the patched MSI without any transforms, but still got the error. Then I tried running the download straight from the enterprise distribution link, but that didn't work either, even on a computer without Adobe Reader installed.
I think there might be something wrong with the enterprise distribution.

Our Windwso 7 64 bit systems never had reader v8.
=== Verbose logging started: 4/12/2012 9:58:22 Build type: SHIP UNICODE 5.00.7600.00 Calling process: C:\Windows\System32\msiexec.exe ===
MSI (c) (8C:84) [09:58:22:702]: Font created. Charset: Req=0, Ret=0, Font: Req=MS Shell Dlg, Ret=MS Shell Dlg
MSI (c) (8C:84) [09:58:22:702]: Font created. Charset: Req=0, Ret=0, Font: Req=MS Shell Dlg, Ret=MS Shell Dlg
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:22:718]: Resetting cached policy values
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:22:718]: Machine policy value 'Debug' is 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:22:718]: ******* RunEngine:
           ******* Product: \\briggslaw\root\AppsDev\Drivers & Utilities\Adobe Reader\Reader 10.1.3\Acroread.msi
           ******* Action:
           ******* CommandLine: **********
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:22:718]: Incrementing counter to disable shutdown. Counter after increment: 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:22:718]: Machine policy value 'DisableUserInstalls' is 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:23:950]: Decrementing counter to disable shutdown. If counter >= 0, shutdown will be denied. Counter after decrement: -1
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:23:950]: SOFTWARE RESTRICTION POLICY: Verifying package --> '\\briggslaw\root\AppsDev\Drivers & Utilities\Adobe Reader\Reader 10.1.3\Acroread.msi' against software restriction policy
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:23:950]: Note: 1: 2262 2: DigitalSignature 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:23:950]: SOFTWARE RESTRICTION POLICY: \\briggslaw\root\AppsDev\Drivers & Utilities\Adobe Reader\Reader 10.1.3\Acroread.msi is not digitally signed
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:23:966]: SOFTWARE RESTRICTION POLICY: \\briggslaw\root\AppsDev\Drivers & Utilities\Adobe Reader\Reader 10.1.3\Acroread.msi is permitted to run at the 'unrestricted' authorization level.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:012]: Cloaking enabled.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:012]: Attempting to enable all disabled privileges before calling Install on Server
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:012]: End dialog not enabled
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:012]: Original package ==> \\briggslaw\root\AppsDev\Drivers & Utilities\Adobe Reader\Reader 10.1.3\Acroread.msi
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:012]: Package we're running from ==> C:\Users\puaedw\AppData\Local\Temp\3dcd6c3.msi
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: APPCOMPAT: Uninstall Flags override found.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: APPCOMPAT: Uninstall VersionNT override found.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: APPCOMPAT: Uninstall ServicePackLevel override found.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: APPCOMPAT: looking for appcompat database entry with ProductCode '{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}'.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: APPCOMPAT: no matching ProductCode found in database.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: MSCOREE not loaded loading copy from system32
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Machine policy value 'DisablePatch' is 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Machine policy value 'AllowLockdownPatch' is 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Machine policy value 'DisableMsi' is 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Machine policy value 'AlwaysInstallElevated' is 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: User policy value 'AlwaysInstallElevated' is 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Product {AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001} is admin assigned: LocalSystem owns the publish key.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Product {AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001} is managed.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Running product '{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}' with elevated privileges: Product is assigned.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Machine policy value 'DisableLUAPatching' is 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Machine policy value 'DisableFlyWeightPatching' is 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Enabling baseline caching for this transaction since all active patches are MSI 3.0 style MSPs or at least one MSI 3.0 minor update patch is active
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Looking for file transform: C:\Windows\Installer\{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}\Acroread.mst
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Original transform ==> C:\Windows\Installer\{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}\Acroread.mst
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Transform we're running from ==> C:\Windows\Installer\{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}\Acroread.mst
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: SOFTWARE RESTRICTION POLICY: Verifying transform --> 'C:\Windows\Installer\{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}\Acroread.mst' against software restriction policy
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: DigitalSignature 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: SOFTWARE RESTRICTION POLICY: C:\Windows\Installer\{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}\Acroread.mst is not digitally signed
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: SOFTWARE RESTRICTION POLICY: C:\Windows\Installer\{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}\Acroread.mst is permitted to run at the 'unrestricted' authorization level.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Validating transform 'C:\Windows\Installer\{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}\Acroread.mst' with validation bits 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Transform 'C:\Windows\Installer\{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}\Acroread.mst' is valid.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2205 2: 3: Patch
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2205 2: 3: PatchPackage
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Media 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: File 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: TRANSFORM: 'PatchPackage' table is missing or empty. No pre-transform fixup necessary.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: TRANSFORM: Applying regular transform to database.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ActionText 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: AdminExecuteSequence 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Condition 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: AdminUISequence 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: AdvtExecuteSequence 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: AdvtUISequence 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: AppId 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: AppSearch 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Feature 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: File 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: CheckBox 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Class 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Icon 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ProgId 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ComboBox 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: CompLocator 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Control 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Dialog 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ControlCondition 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ControlEvent 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: CreateFolder 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: DrLocator 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: DuplicateFile 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ModuleDependency 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Error 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ModuleSignature 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: EventMapping 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Extension 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: MIME 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: LaunchCondition 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ListBox 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ListView 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Media 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ModuleComponents 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: MoveFile 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: MsiAssembly 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: MsiAssemblyName 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: MsiDigitalCertificate 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: MsiFileHash 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: RadioButton 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: RegLocator 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: RemoveFile 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: RemoveRegistry 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: SelfReg 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ServiceControl 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Signature 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: TextStyle 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: TypeLib 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: UIText 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Upgrade 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: UpgradeCode 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Verb 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: MsiPatchCertificate 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: _MsiPatchTransformView 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: #_BaselineCost 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: #_BaselineFile 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: #_BaselineData 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: #_PatchCache 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ISComponentExtended 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ISCustomActionReference 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ISSetupFile 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: LockRegPermissions 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: LockFilePermissions 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: MsiSFCBypass 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: SxsMsmGenComponents 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ISDistribution 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: AppsInUse 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: BackupAndRestoreRegistry 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: DefragFiles 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: DeleteComponents 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: DeleteFiles 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: DeleteProducts 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: DeleteRegistry 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: ServiceInstall 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: TransferRegistry 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 2262 2: AppsInUseEx 3: -2147287038
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: APPCOMPAT: looking for appcompat database entry with ProductCode '{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}'.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: APPCOMPAT: no matching ProductCode found in database.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Transforms are not secure.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Transforming table Property.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding MsiLogFileLocation property. Its value is 'C:\Users\puaedw\AppData\Local\Temp\MSIcd6c2.LOG'.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Command Line: CURRENTDIRECTORY=\\briggslaw\root\AppsDev\Drivers & Utilities\Adobe Reader\Reader 10.1.3 CLIENTUILEVEL=0 CLIENTPROCESSID=1420
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding PackageCode property. Its value is '{F29D7469-E8E4-48F5-BF96-34E18D928DFD}'.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding TRANSFORMS property. Its value is 'C:\Windows\Installer\{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}\Acroread.mst'.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Product Code passed to Engine.Initialize:           ''
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Product Code from property table before transforms: '{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}'
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Product Code from property table after transforms: '{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}'
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Product registered: entering maintenance mode
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Determined that existing product (either this product or the product being upgraded with a patch) is installed per-machine.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding ProductState property. Its value is '5'.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding ProductToBeRegistered property. Its value is '1'.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Entering CMsiConfigurationManager::SetLastUsedSource.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Specifed source is not already in a list.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: User policy value 'SearchOrder' is 'nmu'
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Machine policy value 'DisableBrowse' is 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Machine policy value 'AllowLockdownBrowse' is 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Machine policy value 'AlwaysInstallElevated' is 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: User policy value 'AlwaysInstallElevated' is 0
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Product {AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001} is admin assigned: LocalSystem owns the publish key.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Product {AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001} is managed.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Running product '{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}' with elevated privileges: Product is assigned.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Adding new sources is not allowed.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Warning: rejected attempt to add new source '\\briggslaw\root\AppsDev\Drivers & Utilities\Adobe Reader\Reader 10.1.3\' (product: {AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001})
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Adding PackagecodeChanging property. Its value is '1'.
Another version of this product is already installed. Installation of this version cannot continue. To configure or remove the existing version of this product, use Add/Remove Programs on the Control Panel.
{AC76BA86-7AD7-FFFF-7B44-AA0000000001}
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Note: 1: 1729
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:028]: Product: Adobe Reader X (10.1.3) MUI -- Configuration failed.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:044]: Windows Installer reconfigured the product. Product Name: Adobe Reader X (10.1.3) MUI. Product Version: 10.1.3. Product Language: 1033. Manufacturer: Adobe Systems Incorporated. Reconfiguration success or error status: 1638.
MSI (c) (8C:BC) [09:58:24:044]: MainEngineThread is returning 1638
=== Verbose logging stopped: 4/12/2012 9:58:24 ===

Distributed Cache Mode With W2k8 Enterprise ServerCore ???

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for