Distributed Current Budget shows incorrect value in P6 EPPM 8.3

Hi All,
I am new to P6 EPPM and i would like to understand "How Distributed Current Budget value is calcluated".
Please find the below screen shot which shows the "Distributed current Budget" value is greater than total of Current Budget allocated for the projects.
Please help me.
Regards,
Ashok

Yes, I knew it automatically calculated columns.
Value of "Distributed Current Budget" while you stand at EPS node level = total of current budget for projects under this node.
The total of current budget for projects under Engineering & Construction node is not equal to Distributed current Budget in my screen shot.
Here only i need clarification and please find the screenshot for reference.

Similar Messages

  • Query key figures showing incorrect values

    Hi,
    key figures in my query are showing incorrect values NO CALC POSSIBLE
    Data in the cube is coming from different datasources and the cube is compressed.
    this is how data in the cube looks like
    plant    Unit   currency    Stock Quantity    Stock Value   total ( *** key figure ( inflow and outflow)
    P001    ST                         1000                   0 
    P001             EUR                                    100
    Query result
    plant       stock(PC)            Stock Quantity   Stock Value       total ( cumy figure ( inflow and outflow)
    P001       No Cal possible    1000                  100                   No Cal possible
    How do I resolve in query or cube level so that the NO CALC possible is not displayed.
    thanks

    Hi,
    Indeed my cube is a copy of 0IC_C03.
    Could you please explain more about the filtering.
    I have the following key figures
    0TOTALSTCK
    0ISSTOTSTCK
    0RECTOTSTCK
    ZISSSTCK_VALUE
    ZREC_VALUE
    ZTOTSTKVALUE
    ZTOTSTKVALUE is CKF with inflow and outflow of ZISSSTCK_VALUE
    ZREC_VALUE
    Whenever there is 0 it displays NO CALC possible. I would like to have it blank or 0s.
    thanks

  • Report to correct FD33 report is showing incorrect values ??

    Hi Guys,
    Will appreciate your help on below issue.
    The "RVKRED88 - Reorganization of SD credit data after updating errors" report is showing incorrect values.
    It is specially observed for invoice correction requests that are credit blocked.
    The doc flow is like  Order (say value  1000 $), delivery, shipment, Picking, GI, billing, accounting all cleared/complete.
    The invoice corrrection req (say value  -ve 50$)  was then created with reference to the billing doc.
    The RVKRED88 report shws the original order as open and also shows an open delivery value of 1000$ + 50$= 1050$.
    Is this behaviour correct? If not what might be the cause of this? and how to correct it?
    Regards,
    Naminator
    Edited by: Naminator on Jul 7, 2009 6:22 PM

    I am not sure, how come you are getting correct numbers for UK plant if BX is not loaded. You can get numbers correctly only in one situation which is your initial stock at that plant was ZERO, which is practically not possible.
    You said you are loading for Denmark only.
    Was the BF init done only for UK?
    How come you are loading BF Delta for UK only?
    Did you check properly that BX is not loaded into production by changing the date range. Make sure you put the lowest date range in the from field. I would put 01/01/1000
    As you said ISS is coming right because those are movements and they dont have to do anything with initial stock, but initial stock and movements affec your Total Stock Key Figure.
    - Danny

  • 0weekday1 is showing incorrect values

    Hi,
    After the upgrade it has been noticed that the Time characteristic 0weekday1 is showing incorrect text mapping in Bex Reports reports.
    After analysis and Investigation I found that
    In master data it is maintained as follows which is correct
    1 - Sunday
    2 - Monday
    3 - Tuesday
    4 - Wednesday
    5 - Thursday
    6 - Friday
    7 - Saturday
    But In the multiprovider, when I do F4 on the filed 0weekday1 it is showing the following values
    1 - Monday
    2 - Tuesday
    3 - Wednesday
    4 - Thursday
    5 - Friday
    6 - Saturday
    7 - Sunday.
    In RSRV it is showing inconsistencies but when I tried to do the correction it is failing.
    I have done the info Object repair for 0weekday1 in RSD1. but still the values have not changed.
    Please suggest resolutions to this !!!
    Thanks,
    Shantanu.

    Hi,
    When I see the master data it is maintained properly as stated above.
    But, when I checked the Master Data Read class, it is found that the data is coming from T246 table which is SAP maintained table. And the entries made in T246 table are the one which are incorrectly mapped.
    So, my questions are:
    1. Can we change the values directly in T246 table.
    2. What other programs/objects, etc will be impacted.
    3. Do we have something as "Where used list" for the Tables.
    Thanks,
    Shantanu.

  • Query on virtual cube showing incorrect values

    Experts,
    I have create a virtual cube on a base cube using services (info-source). both virtual as well base cube are z-development and are in BI.
    Base cube has 6 records, now when I check data in virtual cube using display data it shows correct values based on routine written in virtual cube transformation.
    Problem is when I created query on this virtual cube it doesnt show correct data or sometime no applicable data. After debugging I found, in end routine itself result package contains records with blank values in it on which I have written routine. But it does this only while executing query not when I display data in cube.
    Regards,
    Akshay

    Hi!!!
    And how do you solved it?

  • XML Bursting shows incorrect values in email

    We used bursting for sending out AR statements. We want to email the statements and ftp the same to another server for backup copies. When I have my delivery as just email, everything works as expected. When I add 'ftp' delivery in addition to 'email', I see strange behaviour.
    If an element in XML is null, and this element is referenced in the email body/subject line, this element shows values from another element that has a value. For example, we have an element 'comment' which is referenced in subject of the email.
    This 'comment' can be null, and when it is null, the value shows 'party_name'. Any ideas on why XML Bursting program would show values from other elements when the referenced element value is null? And this happens only when I have more than one 'delivery'.

    Hi,
    I am also facing a similar issue, I try to burst the xml file and email it to email address. for records with email address it works fine and when the email address is null, it has taken value from different records (though i don't see it against the respective XML group).
    Did you get a chance to identify the issue?

  • CpQuizInfoPointsscored, cpInfoPercentage and cpQuizInfoTotalCorrectAnswers showing incorrect values

    Hi All,
    I am using captivate 4 - AS2 for publishing. I have built a captivate quiz which is a very straight forward without any question pooling or randomization. All the quesions are standard MCSS/MCMS type and there is no custom activity. After the quiz there is standard scoring slide and after that I have added the certificate widget (captivates inbuilt widget).
    The problem is the score being displayed on score page is correct however in certificate page it is something different. For this I tried tracking following variables on the score page:
    $$cpQuizInfoPointsscored$$
    $$cpQuizInfoTotalCorrectAnswers$$
    $$cpInfoPercentage$$
    The score being displayed is correct and system variable values are incorrect. Attached are a few screenshots for reference ($$cpQuizInfoPointsscored$$ and $$cpQuizInfoTotalCorrectAnswers$$ values are 50, 5 and 140, 14 which should have been 60, 6 and 190, 19 respectively).
    Any pointers to what is wrong?
    Thanks in advance!

    Thanks for the reply.
    No my captivate is the standard installation without any updates. Any pointers to that particular patch? from where I can install it?
    I found this one:
    http://www.adobe.com/support/captivate/captivate_4_downloads.html
    Will this work?

  • FSRM and Quota's showing incorrect values

    Hi,
    I have set up folder quota's, and on one folder I have set it to 100GB.  This Quota shows as 99% used, but the actual folder in Explorer shows only as 28GB used.  What am I missing, or set up wrong, or is there a fix that needs to
    be applied? (I don't think my maths is that bad as I am pretty sure 28 is not 99% of 100.)
    Can anyone help or point me in the right direction.
    Thanks!
    Ben 

    I think I have a similar situation with my file cluster here, and this thread seems to be the closes I have found to what I'm seeing. For starters my file cluster servers up shares for my users, these shares are spread across 9 drives, and I have a folder
    quota on the share of each drive. For example:
    My username is jspatton, so my files are stored on
    \\people\i\jspatton the physical drive on the server is the K: drive and the root folder is I (for users I - J). This folder is shared out, and this folder is where the quota is applied. I have it set at 640GB hard, and I have 80GB available to grow into
    as needed. I think this is fairly common for most folks out there.
    My problem started about 5 days ago when one of my disks dropped to under 1gb of free space. I have a script that runs on my file servers that emails me when a drive drops below a certain threshold. I received that email 5 days ago, followed by a notification
    in SCOM that the disk was low. When I logon to the note the node and open Windows Explorer, I see that the free space is indeed under 1gb. When I use powershell to show me free-space I get a similar answer.
    The odd thing for me is disk management. Down below in the graphical portion it's reporting the disk as 678GB NTFS which is accurate in an attempt to resolve the quota issue I set the quota to max space. But up above it's reporting something different.
    V: 550gb (capacity) 830mb (free)
    The disk is basic, and is in fact 678GB here is the info from fsrm which is also interesting..and maybe i'm just missing something.
    Quota details V:
    Limit 678GB (Hard)
    Used 547GB (80%), Peak Usage: 547GB (80%) Peak Time 3:/16/2012 10:23PM
    Available 131GB
    Volume Details V:
    Capacity 550GB
    Hard quota allocation 678GB (123%)
    available 477 MB
    What have I done recently?
    I increased the quota to equal the total space of the disk.
    I disabled the quota and re-enabled it
    On the file server I have emptied the recycle bin, but I don't really think that has an impact on those folders.
    If anyone can shed some light I would be very grateful.
    Thanks!
    Jeffrey S. Patton Assistant Director of IT School of Engineering Computing Services University of Kansas 1520 West 15th Street Lawrence, KS. 66045-7621 | http://patton-tech.com

  • Excel attachment showing incorrect value

    I have started seeing problems in any excel attachments in columns where dates are clearly being used and instead money is represented. This started happening after upgrading to IOS 6. I currently have an Iphone4. Thanks

    I have been able to replicate this after it was brought to my attention today.  Hope this is fixed..

  • Remittance shows incorrect value

    Hi
    Quick question:
    I paid out a dealer on SAP and DIC was completed successfully. The rpoblem is that when i check the remittance, i find that there was a lot of funds that were sutracted from the dealer.
    Is there a reason why this is the case?
    Please assist.
    Thanking you in advance
    Regards
    KayGee.

    Hi
    In some cases the DIC completes but the amount does not show on the remittance while in some cases, tinstead of seeing the amount paid to the dealer, i see a large some of money when i print the remittance.
    In FBL1N i can see the DIC amount but when i go to Websphere to print the remittance, i cant see this amount or i see a large amount of money.
    Any idea what may be the reason for this?
    Please assist
    Regards
    Kagiso

  • Current budget value is missing

    Dear Colleagues,
    please advise what could be the reason for the following problem.
    Transaction CJ31 (display original budget) shows no value for the field 'current budget' for the current fiscal year, but Project Cost Line Items (CJI4) shows, that the value was planned and cancelled several times, but at least it has line item.
    Besides total for annual values (FY2013 + FY2014) in CJ31 shows the value as FY has budget amount
    e.g.
    CJI4 for WBS for FY2014: 300
    FY2013  Current Budget 100
    FY2014 Current Budget 0
    Total for annual values 400
    Many thanks in advance.
    Kind regards,
    Irina

    Hi,
    One thing, Planned budget will never show in Current Budget column in CJ30/CJ31. Current Budget is different than Planned budget. Current Budget is operative/real budget which can be consumed.
    Current budget consists of the original budget, supplements, returns and transfers. Have you performed these tranx?
    Regards
    Shishir

  • Creation of a Query to show the values for the current month and the last 12 months data.

    Dear All,
    Good day!
    I have to create a Query with the below requirement.
    I have to create a Query to show the values for the current month and the last 12 months data.
    Can you please guide me how to achieve this ??
    thank you,
    Regards,
    Hema

    Hema
    explain the exact problem..? as you mentioned you want to create query to show values for current month and last 12 months.. so I think you want to show values for 12 months from current data.. you can achive this by multiple way..
    you can have selection screen and field with date .. and restrict based on system current date and 12 months before or you can handle this at your target.. .. I mean there are multiple ways to restrict data by date range..
    for some more hints..
    http://www.forumtopics.com/busobj/viewtopic.php?t=34393&sid=7fba465d0463bf7ff5ec46c128754ed6
    http://businessintelligence.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/cognos8-l/how-to-display-last-12-months-in-report-based-on-todays-date-3231850
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/3217381
    search on SDN you will get many other ways..
    Thanks,
    Bhupesh

  • Incorrect values in available budget in report S_KI4_38000050

    Dear Experts,
    We are getting incorrect values in available budget column against Fun/Fund center -commitment item in report S_KI4_38000050.
    Actually we have posted entries against fund center/commitment item without releasing budget and it allowed post entries due to deactivated availability control.
    Before Posting FI entry:
    Release Budget=0
    Assigned=0
    Available=0
    Commitment=0
    After Posting entry of Rs. 5000
    Release=0
    Assigned= -5000
    Available=5000
    Commitment= -5000
    Ques-1 Why available is 5000?
    Now if I released some amount say 10000 then,
    Release=10000
    Assigned= -5000
    Available=15000
    Commitment= -5000
    Ques-2 How to correct values mentioned above?
    As I think, the correct values should be:
    Release=10000
    Assigned= 5000
    Available=5000
    Commitment= 5000
    Regards
    Shishir

    Experts...Waiting for your suggestions..

  • Budget Scenarios - Actual Value

    Good Morning,
    When I setup values in the budget scenarios for expense or cost accounts I have incorrect values in the "Actual" column. The system doesn't update the real (actual) values correctly. I'm with SAP B1 2007 PL42.
    The problem is that, when I choose "yes" when the system displays following message: "Account XXXXX has transactions in the systems. Do you want to restore the account's accumulators?", the system does not update correctly the current G/L accounts bookkeeping balance to the Actual column...
    Do you know the reason or what can I do to solve this?
    Thank you.
    Susana Cunha

    Hi,
    To get the Actual Column corrected, the whole row has to be deleted of the G/L Account with the wrong Budget and then the Budget has to be determined again for this G/L Account. This way after pressing the yes or yes to all at pop-up window questions;
    'Transactions found in the system for account XXX. Would you like to restore accumulators for this account?'
    Also please check the following
    Please check out the document on the Knowledge Base which covers your
    question. Go to:
    https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/smb/sbo/documentation ->
    Select 2004 and -> How-To Guides 2004 A & 2004.2 B ->
    Budget in Release 2004 A
    The section titled 'Defining Budget after the Commencement of
    Activity' (page 12 of 18) explains the message  "Restore Account
    Accumulator". I have copied the section below:
    Defining Budget after the Commencement of Activity:
    You can define a budget for accounts against which operations have been
    performed.
    These operations are: bookkeeping operations, as well as open purchase
    orders and open purchase delivery notes.
    After entering an amount, and clicking Update, the following message is
    displayed: "Transactions found in the system for account XXX. Would you
    like to restore accumulators for this account?
    -Selecting "Yes" or "Yes to All" restores the accumulator for the
    afore-mentioned account on the basis of the transactions and open
    documents found in the system. The result is inserted in the Actual and
    Future columns.
    -Selecting "No" or "No to All" leaves the Actual and Future columns
    empty.
    If you select "No" or "No to all", transactions created after the budget
    was defined will also not appear in the columns representing the
    balances. However, the budget reports will always show the cumulative
    balance since the beginning of the year.
    Regards
    Vikas
    SAP Business One Forums Team
    Edited by: Vikas Rastogi on May 5, 2009 6:10 PM

  • Incorrect value in the dynamic table.

    Hii,
          I am new to abap, i wrote a program which is showing dump  " Incorrect value in the dynamic table." .
       Error in the ABAP Application Program
       The current ABAP program "SAPLKKBL" had to be terminated because it  come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    pls help me to solve this issue.
    REPORT  zBLOCKED_ALV.
    *tables: ekko,ekpo.
    type-pools slis.
    parameters porder like ekko-ebeln.
    data:  i_ekko type   table of ekko,
              i_ekpo type   table of ekpo,
             fieldcat type slis_t_fieldcat_alv,
             keyinfo type slis_keyinfo_alv.
      clear keyinfo.
      keyinfo-header01 = 'ebeln'.
      yinfo-item01 = 'ebeln'.
    select * from ekko into table i_ekko where ebeln = porder.
      select * from ekpo into table i_ekpo for all entries in i_ekko
        where ebeln = i_ekko-ebeln.
        CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_FIELDCATALOG_MERGE'
          EXPORTING
            I_PROGRAM_NAME               = sy-cprog
            I_INTERNAL_TABNAME           = 'i_ekko'
            I_STRUCTURE_NAME             = 'ekko'
          CHANGING
            CT_FIELDCAT                  = fieldcat.
    refresh fieldcat.
        CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_FIELDCATALOG_MERGE'
          EXPORTING
            I_PROGRAM_NAME               = sy-cprog
            I_INTERNAL_TABNAME           = 'i_ekpo'
            I_STRUCTURE_NAME             = 'ekpo'
          CHANGING
            CT_FIELDCAT                  = fieldcat.
    CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_HIERSEQ_LIST_DISPLAY'
      EXPORTING
        I_CALLBACK_PROGRAM             = sy-cprog
        IT_FIELDCAT                    = fieldcat
        I_TABNAME_HEADER               = 'i_ekko'
        I_TABNAME_ITEM                 = 'i_ekpo'
        IS_KEYINFO                     = keyinfo
      TABLES
        T_OUTTAB_HEADER                = i_ekko
        T_OUTTAB_ITEM                  = i_ekpo.

    Hi,
    You have to pass 'EKKO' and 'EKPO' i.e in caps to the exporting parameter I_STRUCTURE_NAME of the function module
    'REUSE_ALV_FIELDCATALOG_MERGE'.
    I think this would work, if not pls let me know.
    Thanks,
    Radhika

Maybe you are looking for