Distributed processing for Photoshop?

Is there a way to link together several computers to process large documents more quickly? I have seen programs like Qmaster and Compressor for Final Cut users–is there anything like that for processing in Photoshop?

And what specifically would you need or hope to achieve? In order to process data on multiple cores/ computers you would have to slice it up fist which in itself introduces considerable overhead and then you would also need ways of verifying integrity, deal with seam blending of separately processed "tiles" and a million other things. Batch processing multiple documents across a distributed network - perhaps one day. Processing single large documents distributed? Extemely unlikely as it woul require to rewrite PS and its algorithms from the ground up.
Mylenium

Similar Messages

Urgent!! - Adobe CC crashes during the "extracting " process for Photoshop, need to install the full version of , without passing trough CC

I need urgent support because Adobe CC crashes after the "extracting " process of an app. So if i choose to download an application ( Muse, Photoshop etc ) it downloads, and after that it crashes, is there any support available ?
Thanks,

Problem solved, it is the firewall who blocked the installation, everything works fine now!

What's the best network for distributed processing?

Hey guys,
I have a network of three computers... I have distributed processing all set up on Compressor, and it runs really fast through the ethernet connection I have set up.
What's the absolute best way to set up this network?
The macbooks both have a firewire input, but that's not being used to transfer the data in this case... it's all ethernet.
The mac pro has 2 firewire ports... leaving one potentially open for a network.
Do you think it would be beneficial to set up a firewire network for these three computers, or is there any reason why a simple ethernet network is preferable?
Thanks in advance for all of your help...
Oh! One more question!
If I was going to set up a firewire network, how would I do it?
---Trav

Hi MrWizard.. do you have Compressor.app V4.1? (Dec 2013) installed or the older ones.? According to you sign you're on older OSX 10.7.5.
The idea you post is sound HOWEVER... it's somewhat fickle and troubesome.. I'm assuming old V3.4 Compressor/Qmaster later ....
Hardware:
You can CERTAINLY use the Firewire ports as NETWORKS NIC using IP over FW.. It certain works between TWO macs as Ive used it yeas back..
Assume you have a FW hub or use the single FW HUB in the MACPRO ... or scout around for a fw switch 800 (if they exist!) or just use a FW800 to 400 cables and an cheap legacy FW400 hub... I saw one once in Taipei!
Simply on each configure the Firewrie INTERFACEs in the System Preferences / Network .... (+ add interface etc etc), apply
Either
hard code (manual) an IP address (1.1.1.x) for each,
Install and deploy OSX SERVER on your MACPRO (IP - 1.1.1.1) and set up a simple DNS and domain "mrwizards.cool_network" for that FW subnet (1.1.1.1x) then DHCP server for that subnet so that when the two MACBOOM PROS connect tey get a an IP address such as 1.1.1.2-253 and assign machine names. Set the dsn serahc on each machine to add 1.1.1.1 (your macpro to resolve machine names0. More work however easier to manage.
test your local DNS between the machines or TRACEROUTE / PING the machines from each other and verify the IP path over the FW NICs works ok.
as long as you can ascertain the IP traffic around your 1.1.1.x subnet the better.
Once you configure these as a separate NETWORK, you will need some way to provide FireWire however... this is only the start of your headaches. Im assuming you are on an olde Compressor/Qmaster V3.5 with legacy FCS 3 suite... true/false?
The configurations takes patience and trial and error and some clear understanding of what you are trying ot acheive if its really worth the effort.
TRANSCODING over nodal cluster: AKA DISTRIBUTED SEGMENTED MULTIPASS TRANSCODING!
ON paper you'd imaging the throughput would be worth it. Sadly the converse is true!.. it often takes LONGER to use a bunch of nodes rather than submission on a SINGLE machine using a CLUSTER on a single machine....
the elapsed time for the submission relies on the processing speed of the slowest machine and its network connection
final assembly of the quicktime peices for the object
hmmmm often quickier just to use a single CLUSTER on the MACPRO!.
You MAY want to consider this option assuming the hardware you have mentioned:
what about this instead of FireWre NICS?
USE Gbit ETHERNET allaround.
Steps:
Set the WIFI on the host to use the WIFI only network for you usual internal activities and bonjour (.local) etc.. assume low IP traffic. - all works oK
OPTION: on the MACPRO dedicate EN0 (first ethernet NIC to WIFI router). Turn off WIFI on MACPRO.
Utilise the ETHERNET (EN0 - builit in ethernet) on the MACBOOKs (older ones? .. will be very slow BTW)
connect the MACPRO Second ETHERNET, and the MACBOOk (pros?) ethenets to a cheap 8 x port Ethernet HUB switch ($HK150 / €15) they are all switches these days). This gives you an isolated subnet... no router needed. Plug in the hub/switch and power on!
look at step 3. above .. QUICK START: just hard code IP addresses as follows in each SYSTEM PREF/network):
MAC PRO ip 1.1.1.1
MACBOOK (Pro) #2 : ip address 1.1.1.2
MACBOOK (Pro) #2 : ip address 1.1.1.3
test the 1.1.1.1-1.1.1.3 network... (ping or traceroute)
V3.5 Compressor and Qmaster for ye old FCS - dig in to QMASTER PREFS as:
MACPRO - set servces and ALSO MAKE CONTROLLER., set NETWORK INTERFACE to the interface on the ETHERNET 2 (not all). set instances to more than 1 one instance but NOT max! Tick MANAGED SERVICES
MACBOO (pro)'s set servces only, set NETWORK INTERFACE to the interface on the ETHERNET (not all). set instances to more than 1 one instance but NOT max! Tick MANAGED SERVICES
launch APPLE QADMINISTRATOR.app and make a managed cluster - easy (DONT waste your time with Quickcluster!.. just dont)
IMPORTANT: make sure teh SOURCE and TARGETS of ALL the pbjects tha the transcodes will use are AVAILALBE (mounted and access) on ALL the machines that you want to participate.
set up batch and make sure SEGMENTED is ticked in the inspector..... submit the job
See how you go.
However if you have Compressor V4.1 (dec 2013) then just set your network up and it should just work with out all teh voodoo in the previous steps.
Post your results for others to see.
Warwick
Hong Kong

Can anyone recommend a process for moving just my OS and Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom to the SSD?

I have an early 2011 MBP running Mountain Lion. I just removed the superdrive and added an SSD. I want to use it to boot from and also run Photoshop and Lightroom from. Can anyone recommend a process for moving my OS and those programs to the SSD?

I'm assuming your doing this because of data you don't want pernament on the SSD as they can' be scrubbed like hard drives can.
Disconnect any other drives.
1: Format the SSD 1 partition, click the box, option GUID and OS X extended journaled as the format.
2: Download Carbon Copy Cloner.
3: Clone your MacintoshHD partition to a blank powered external drive also formatted the same as above.
4: Hold option/alt key and boot the machine (wired or built in keyboard) and then select the clone to boot from,
5: Once in the clone, click it's drive name and change the name if it's the same as the OS X boot volume.
6: On the clone, head to System Preferences > Accounts and create a new Admin account.
7: If you need to move files between accounts on the clone, see this. Combine two+ Users Accounts on the same machine (be careful that your selecting the correct clones other account)
8: Once your moving files on the clone is complete, then log into the new user account and delete the old user account.
9: Use Carbon Copy Cloner to clone the clone to the SSD.
10: Use Disk Utiltiy to repair permissions on all drives.
The SSD should be moved to the HD slot and the HD to the optical slot and used as a file drive.
CCC has a option to not include certain folders like the other user account you don't want, however I tend not to recommend things that are not too far out of line with Apple's ways of doing things as it usually results in bad things occuring. Somewhere in OS X it's recorded of that other user account, so it might still show up in logins and such.
Also you may want to transfer some files to the other account, so that's why I recommend this method.
Good Luck

Where can i find a dutch manual for photoshop cs6

Hi,
I'm trying to find the dutch manual for Photoshop CS6.
There is a hyperlink available on this page Help bij Photoshop | Archief called Help bij Adobe Photoshop CS5 (PDF), but if I follow this I end up on an "error page" in English telling me that the requested page isn't available.
Can someone provide me with this PDF-file please?
I can download this PDF in English, but it would be so much easier for me to read and understand the subject matter in Dutch.
So, is there anybody out there who can send it to me?
Thanks!
Michael

You should ask in Photoshop General Discussion
This forum is about the Cloud as a delivery process, not about using individual programs
If you start at the Forums Index https://forums.adobe.com/welcome
You will be able to select a forum for the specific Adobe product(s) you use
Click the "down arrow" symbol on the right (where it says All communities) to open the drop down list and scroll

Building a GOD BOX for PHOTOSHOP CS 2 need help on specs

I will review my situation in detail but If you would like to also read a linked similar posting here it is::
http://www.bigbruin.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8269
Ok so, I made a deal with the local PC shop, I will be trading my time as a photographer for a large portion of the cost of hardware that they would otherwise not be selling. Some things they will have to order but most of the things I need even the high end stuff they already have. So Money is of no object.
I am running into issues with my current system being that it is nearly 6 years old and I custom built it for under $150 Monitor included. Since then I have upgraded my Camera Equipment as I have become more and more sucsessfull with my photography business. I am currently shooting 16.7 Megapixel files with my Canon 1DS Mark II and 22 megapixels with a rented hasselblad with a Phase One Digital Back. Frankly my 700Mhz machine just isn't cutting it. It's time to upgrade.
Now Normaly I would go All Mac and Get a top of the line G5 Quad processor unit fully upgraded however I am still young and dont have good credit dispite all my efforts and they just wont finance me. so this local PC shop is my only hope. Thus I need a top of the line system.
This computer is going to be expandable so I need to have extra drive bays so a Full Server Tower is in order I think!
Also I am opting for aluminum Case because it is more conductive than plastic and should help radiate some of the heat this GOD BOX is going to Generate.
I could use some specifics for each of the areas, if anyone has experience with high end systems and would like to recommend hardware I am all ears. The information is only a light template. "think of it as a layer" nothing set in stone. However I would appreciate a swift reply because I will be building the system in less than a week!
(( STORAGE & SPEED ))
I heard that having seperate hard drives is the way to go to improve performance. Also It will help me keep things organized and easy to reformat if I have a problem with an OS. here are the specs a friend suggested.
80 Gig Raptor HD for OS
180 GIG Serial ATA Raptor HD for Photoshop dedicated Scratch Disk
180 GIG Serial ATA Raptor HD for working files for Quick accessing (temp files).
two 320 Gig Serial ATA Raid slower more reliable Hard Drives for a Mirror Raid setup image reduncancy is a good thing for photographers when a currupt Hard drive means missed deadlines lost clients and lawsuits!! YIKES!
2 DVD + - Combo Drive's that can accept dule layer dvd's unless anyone has heard of the Maxell Holographic Optical Storage Media coming out early january?? 120MB/s transfer speed, 50+ years archive life up to 1.6 terrbytes of storage!! I cant wait until its in production!
(( Processor BUS SPEED MOTHER BOARDS AND MEMORY ))
I need the best most reliable PC Mother Board that can accept the fastest long duration memory, I am aware that there are some types of ram that have higher speeds but cant move as much data at a time. Since much of what i do is batch processing longer periods are a better solution for me than faster acceloration.
This is strictly a photoshop machine No games no email just photoshop the way computers were made to run.
Whats the best motherboard that suports dule / quad processor systems??? are there quad processor systems available for PCs? can photoshop CS 2 muchless Windows XP 64 support such hardware?
it's got to be 64bit processors dule core if possible
someone told me Dule channel DDR PC8000 is the way to go, ANY Comments?
Whats the best CRT Monitor for under $1200
I specify CRT vs LCD because LCD still dosn't have the quality in dynamic range that CRT have, and the DMAX of a LCD is much more worse than the Dmax of a CRT.
Some obvious perifials are Firewire 800 and 400 standard and USB 2.0 ports
is there any news of Photoshop accepting more than 4 GIGS of ram in the next update?? If so I may opt for a 8 G

I will review my situation in detail but If you would like to also read a linked similar posting here it is::
http://www.bigbruin.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8269
Ok so, I made a deal with the local PC shop, I will be trading my time as a photographer for a large portion of the cost of hardware that they would otherwise not be selling. Some things they will have to order but most of the things I need even the high end stuff they already have. So Money is of no object.
I am running into issues with my current system being that it is nearly 6 years old and I custom built it for under $150 Monitor included. Since then I have upgraded my Camera Equipment as I have become more and more sucsessfull with my photography business. I am currently shooting 16.7 Megapixel files with my Canon 1DS Mark II and 22 megapixels with a rented hasselblad with a Phase One Digital Back. Frankly my 700Mhz machine just isn't cutting it. It's time to upgrade.
Now Normaly I would go All Mac and Get a top of the line G5 Quad processor unit fully upgraded however I am still young and dont have good credit dispite all my efforts and they just wont finance me. so this local PC shop is my only hope. Thus I need a top of the line system.
This computer is going to be expandable so I need to have extra drive bays so a Full Server Tower is in order I think!
Also I am opting for aluminum Case because it is more conductive than plastic and should help radiate some of the heat this GOD BOX is going to Generate.
I could use some specifics for each of the areas, if anyone has experience with high end systems and would like to recommend hardware I am all ears. The information is only a light template. "think of it as a layer" nothing set in stone. However I would appreciate a swift reply because I will be building the system in less than a week!
(( STORAGE & SPEED ))
I heard that having seperate hard drives is the way to go to improve performance. Also It will help me keep things organized and easy to reformat if I have a problem with an OS. here are the specs a friend suggested.
80 Gig Raptor HD for OS
180 GIG Serial ATA Raptor HD for Photoshop dedicated Scratch Disk
180 GIG Serial ATA Raptor HD for working files for Quick accessing (temp files).
two 320 Gig Serial ATA Raid slower more reliable Hard Drives for a Mirror Raid setup image reduncancy is a good thing for photographers when a currupt Hard drive means missed deadlines lost clients and lawsuits!! YIKES!
2 DVD + - Combo Drive's that can accept dule layer dvd's unless anyone has heard of the Maxell Holographic Optical Storage Media coming out early january?? 120MB/s transfer speed, 50+ years archive life up to 1.6 terrbytes of storage!! I cant wait until its in production!
(( Processor BUS SPEED MOTHER BOARDS AND MEMORY ))
I need the best most reliable PC Mother Board that can accept the fastest long duration memory, I am aware that there are some types of ram that have higher speeds but cant move as much data at a time. Since much of what i do is batch processing longer periods are a better solution for me than faster acceloration.
This is strictly a photoshop machine No games no email just photoshop the way computers were made to run.
Whats the best motherboard that suports dule / quad processor systems??? are there quad processor systems available for PCs? can photoshop CS 2 muchless Windows XP 64 support such hardware?
it's got to be 64bit processors dule core if possible
someone told me Dule channel DDR PC8000 is the way to go, ANY Comments?
Whats the best CRT Monitor for under $1200
I specify CRT vs LCD because LCD still dosn't have the quality in dynamic range that CRT have, and the DMAX of a LCD is much more worse than the Dmax of a CRT.
Some obvious perifials are Firewire 800 and 400 standard and USB 2.0 ports
is there any news of Photoshop accepting more than 4 GIGS of ram in the next update?? If so I may opt for a 8 G

Having trouble setting up Distributed Processing / Qmaster

Hey Guys,
I was able to (at one point) use Compressor 3 via Final Cut Pro Studio with Qadministrator to allow Distributed processing either via managed clusters or QuickCluster - both worked on both macs (a 2007 2.6Ghz Core 2 Duo iMac and a 2009 3.06Ghz Core 2 Duo iMac).
I just upgraded to Final Cut Pro X and Compressor 4. As far as I can tell, the Qmaster settings now reside in the Compressor application itself, so I tried setting it up as best as I could using both the QuickCluster and managed cluster options (very similar to when using the older Qmaster) but no dice. I can see my controller's cluster from the secondary iMac, but it always displays submissions as "Not Available" and it does not help with processing. I've tried everything I can think of - I tried using FCS Remover for the older version of Final Cut, I tried looking around via terminal to see if there are any residual files & settings prior to the FCPX install, I've tried following as many instructions as I could find (including apple's official documentation on Compressor 4 on setting up a cluster) but NOTHING seems to work. I'm at a loss!!
Unfortunately, any documentation or refrences to issues with Qmaster / Distributed processing is related to older versions of Compressor and whatnot.
Can anyone help or have any suggestions? I have no idea how to get this working and I am having trouble finding anything useful online during my research
Perhaps someone is familiar and can help me set it up correctly? I'm verrrry new to Final Cut in general, so I appologize in advance if i'm a bit slow but i'll try to keep up!
Thanks,

In spite of all Apple's hype I'm not sure distributed processing is actually working.
First I ran in to the problem with permisions on the /Users/Shared/Library/Application Support folder. There's some info about that in this discussion. You'll need to fix it on each computer you're trying to use as a node.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3139466?start=0&tstart=0
Then I finally found some decent documentation on Compressor 4 here
http://help.apple.com/compressor/mac/4.0/en/compressor/usermanual/#chapter=29%26 section=1
However no matter what I tried I could not get the compression to spread across more than one computer. I tried managed clusters, quick clusters, and even "this computer plus". I was testing on a mac pro, a mac mini, and a macbook air. I could disable the mac pro and the processing would move to the mini, disable the mini and it would move the the macbook air. No matter what I do though it won't run on multiple machines.
I'm also having trouble doing any kind of compositing in FCPX and getting it to compress properly. I see this error
7/20/11 11:07:42.438 PM ProMSRendererTool: [23:07:42.438] <<<< VTVideoDecoderSelection >>>> VTSelectAndCreateVideoDecoderInstanceInternal: no video decoder found for 'png '
and then I end up with a hung job in the Share Monitor that if I try to cancel just sits there forever saying "canceling".
I'm seeing a bunch of Adobe AIR Encrypted Local Storage errors in the log too. Don't know what that has to do with FCPX but I'll have a look and try and figure it out.

Advice needed on monitor for Photoshop and Lightroom use

Hi. I am aserious amature photographer wishing to move to the next level and sell some of my work.
I just had a custom pc built to work with the new copies of Photoshop CS5 and Lightroom 3 I bought (lots or RAM and HD space, ssd, etc....)
The last piece of my system is to purchase a monitor. I want to be somewhere in the better then Best Buy but less than NEC/Eizo range in price, or between $500 - $900. I have worked with cameras since the early 80's and moved to digital several years ago but the only post processing I have done is with Photoshop Elements. I would be doing mostly prints to sell but also need to have a web site to do so. Will also use the pc for daily net surfing... but do not game or watch a lot of video on the pc.
Being really new to this whole process I have a few questions.
The first thing I need to decide is whether I need to look for a wide gamut display or not.
I realize the whole chain must be 10 bit (Adobe -OS - graphics driver - graphics card - display port.
I have Adobe Photoshop CS5 and Lightroom 3, Win7 64 bit, Zotac ZT 50701 10M video card (which uses GeForce GTX 560 fermi and an nvidia chipset. It does have displayport). I am having a hard time determining whether my video card actually supports wide gamut (10bit).
Standard vs Wide Gamut? Is wide gamut important enough to deal with the issues it brings (calibration, viewing things other than PS and LR or color managed, which appear to be rare?) Is sRGB good enough for most prints (don't do fine art, mostly nature and portraits but starting to do some HRD things). If wide gamut is the way to go I have no problem with that and have the time to learn about calibration, color management, etc... But I also want to make sure the juice is worth the squeeze.
24" vs 27"? Is there any advantage to one or the other when editing photos?
IPS vs PLS? I realize they are similar but are there differences worth noting?
Glossy vs Matte Anti-Glare? seems to be a lot of comments regarding the anti-glare coating, mostly poor. Yet I can see issues using a glossy screen in my study with a window to my back.
One manufacturer vs another? I realize Eizo, NEC and LaCie are at the top of the heap. But with my budget, after upgrading my pc and camera equipment, I can't make that work now. So I need to choose from the next group down (Dell, HP, Samsung, Asus...)
One or two monitors? It looks like many (mid-grade) wide gamut monitors do a lousy job of displaying anything but color managed sites. Is that necessarily true of all the mid-grades? Or can some be used for graphics but as well for routine net surfing, MS Office, etc...? Or am I better off getting two monitors, one for graphics and one for the rest? That would pretty much limit me to 24" or less given my budget (used to using a Dell 21" TN monitor that oddly crapped out just as my new pc was done).
The more I read reviews the more confusing it gets. There seems to be a difference of opinion even among pros on whether to go wide gamut or stick with an easier sRGB. Realizing a standard gamut monitor would be cheaper, I do want to make the right decision up front, given my budget.
The one thing I have found astounding is that there is nowhere to actually see many of the monitors I am considering. We live in Nashville TN but my wife is from Atlanta Ga so we drove there a few weeks ago to visit family and for me to visit monitor shops. Even the largest ones there (Fry's and Microcenter) had minimal IPS monitors, a few Dells and HP's. The knowledge of their sales folks was so poor I finally gave up. Felt bad about this until I posted this on another board and got a reply from a guy in LA (second largest city in the US) that he wanted to see a particular monitor and there was no place even there to do so.
Anyhow, here is what I have considered:
24" Wide Gamut: Dell U2410 and Asus PA246Q. Dells appear to be good IF you get a good one. The Asus appears to be a clone of the Dell that gets a lot of good press.
27" Wide Gamut: Dell U2711 that also gets a ton of good reviews
24: Standard Gamut: Dell U2412 and HP ZR2440.
27" Standard Gamut: Samsung S27A850D and Apple Cinema- The Samsung uses PLS technology versus IPS while the Apple is a glossy screen that will work with a pc.
Sorry for the long post. Any comments are greatly appreciated.

dkg62 wrote:
I realize the whole chain must be 10 bit
Not trying to talk you out of setting up a 10 bit pipeline, but it's still not very mature, and it really isn't a necessity to get a good editing experience.
Personally I find advantage in using two 4:3 ratio monitors for Photoshop work. All my panels are on the right monitor, while pretty much the entire left one shows the Photoshop main window and the working canvas space. My desktop is 3200 x 1200 pixels overall, and I find having the panels remain visible all the time is important.
Regarding whether a wide gamut is important... Will you be printing to devices that deliver a wide gamut? What other things will you be doing with your system?
It's not a no-brainer whether a wider gamut monitor is always "better" for everything, since it can accentuate the differences between the output from color-managed and non-color-managed applications, and it's definitely true that not everything is color-managed. With a monitor that's close to sRGB, for example, you might find Internet Explorer output acceptable, while using a wide gamut monitor will result in garishly oversaturated IE displays. On the other hand, FireFox (with a settings tweak) seems to get color management right, so there is an alternative.
I think, as John has implied above, you should work to get your head completely around how color-management works, soup to nuts. If you don't, there will always be things that are a mystery or which surprise you at the wrong times. Being able to order a print and have it come back with the expected color can be very important, as you might imagine.
-Noel

Downloading error for Photoshop Elements on my Mac 10.5.8. Help!

Downloading error for Photoshop Elements 11 on my Mac 10.5.8. After downloading and getting past the serial number information, the error below occurs. I've restarted the computer, and reinstalled the application install process several times now. HELP!
Exit Code: 7
-------------------------------------- Summary --------------------------------------
- 0 fatal error(s), 12 error(s), 13 warning(s)
WARNING: DW066: OS requirements not met for {FA19351D-E98C-48C1-B5E1-0C8C42B5E11C}
WARNING: DW066: OS requirements not met for {F7FD5B5C-CE79-4657-AEB7-B0EE4626C912}
WARNING: DW031: Payload:{F6F5021E-0548-43C1-82CC-C5C7A6906585} Camera Profiles Installer 7.0.0.0 has been updated and has been selected for repair. The patch {0449467E-102A-4514-9F4D-91BCEE129390} Camera Profiles Installer_7.1_ElementsCameraRawProfile7.0All 7.1.0.0 will be uninstalled now.
WARNING: DW031: Payload:{F6F5021E-0548-43C1-82CC-C5C7A6906585} Camera Profiles Installer 7.0.0.0 has been updated and has been selected for repair. The patch {0449467E-102A-4514-9F4D-91BCEE129390} Camera Profiles Installer_7.1_ElementsCameraRawProfile7.0All 7.1.0.0 will be uninstalled now.
----------- Payload: {64191879-379D-4ADF-9D1E-929FC71E7218} Elements 11 Organizer 11.0.0.0 -----------
ERROR: DW030: Custom Action for payload {64191879-379D-4ADF-9D1E-929FC71E7218} Elements 11 Organizer 11.0.0.0 returned error. Failing this payload.
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
WARNING: DW036: Payload cannot be installed due to dependent operation failure
ERROR: DW050: The following payload errors were found during install:
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe WinSoft Linguistics Plugin CS5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Photoshop Camera Raw for Elements 11: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Elements 11 Organizer: Failed due to Language Pack installation failure
ERROR: DW050: - Elements 11 Organizer_AdobeElements11Organizer_en_US: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe XMP Panels CS5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobeTypeSupport CS5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe Linguistics CS5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - AdobeCMaps CS5: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe Photoshop Elements 11_AdobePhotoshopElements11_en_US: Install failed
ERROR: DW050: - Adobe Photoshop Elements 11: Failed due to Language Pack installation failure

you don't meet the system requirements:
Multicore Intel® processor
Mac OS X v10.6 through v10.8
1GB of RAM (2GB for HD video functions)
4GB of available hard-disk space (additional free space required during installation)
1024x768 display resolution
DVD-ROM drive
QuickTime 7 software required for multimedia features
Internet connection required for Internet-based services*
update your os.

Regarding Goods Reversal & Goods Issue Process for PO

Hi Experts,
           Could you any one tel me what is Goods Reversal and Goods Issue process for PO...
How to create the FM & detailed Procedure Pls?....
Please any one tel me.......
Thanks & Reagards
HB

Hi Hans,
SOURCE : HELP.SAP
Purpose
Inventory Management uses this process in such a way that the goods issue posting is divided into two parts that run in separate systems. Posting the GI document in the supplying plant results in a message to the receiving plant. The receiving plant then performs a complementary posting. The physical goods receipt takes place as usual.
Prerequisites
When using batch processing, the following prerequisites must be fulfilled:
Both the original and target systems have the same batch definition level.
The batch definition level is either the material or the client.
An ALE scenario exists for materials and classes (characteristics).
Unique batch numbers exist cross-system.
Batches can only be changed in their original system when they are not decoupled. From an organizational point of view, this must also lead to the batch status being changeable in a local SAP R/3 system. For example, this is impossible when transfer posting to a new batch and results in further actions, for example, relabeling containers, palettes and so on.
Characteristics
As for the purchase order in a one-system situation, the system should automatically post the material into the stock in transit at the receiving profit center and the corresponding Profit Center Accounting using intra-CC transfer prices at goods issue for the purchase order and the unchecked delivery. This requirement is valid for one-system situations as well as for two-system situations where there is an ALE interface. No internal billing document should be created.
In a two-system case, the receiving profit center should be derived at goods issue from the unchecked delivery. Profit Center Accounting then takes place with
Stock change transfer price to stock
Internal expense to internal sales
Internal clearing account to stock change transfer price.
Account determination in a purchase order for an intra-company-code transaction must be different from account determination in external transactions. Automatic GR/IR account clearing is required in both one-system and two-system situations.
The stock in transit must be visible in the receiving profit center.
The system must send a shipping notification at goods issue in one-system and two-system situations.
You need to create an invoice document for the internal and external trading statistics for cross-boundary deliveries as well as for customs purposes.
GR/GI slips are created.
Process Flow
Goods Issue Posting for Stock Transfers
The delivery triggers the goods issue in the issuing system.
The call contains the stock transport order data known in the delivery, including the PO item and the logical system of the recipient.
The transaction (quantity and value updates) is selected using the movement type:
Movement Type
Function
641
Goods issue with UB logic (Creation of stock in transit at recipient, immediate value posting).
647
As 641, however the goods receipt line (movement type 101) is added automatically, so that the goods receipt is posted at the same time as the goods issue (one-step procedure).
You determine the movement type according to the schedule line category in Sales and Distribution. The goods issue for a cross-system stock transfer must be different from the integrated transaction. This is achieved by adding a new movement type.
You post quantities and values at goods issue in the same way as a goods issue for a sales order. That is to say, the quantity is posted in the supplying plant and the value is adjusted to that of the stock account. The offsetting posting is made to a clearing account. The known data from the delivery is copied to Accounting to balance the account where necessary.
The system creates a message to the appropriate receiving system for all items with reference to a cross-system purchase order. The system does not perform any validity checks on the recipients data before posting begins. Incorrect Customizing results in the update being terminated.
If a goods issue has receiving plants in different logical systems, an IDoc is sent for each system.
In order that the goods receipt is able to use the values on the receiver side, you must add the values used to post the goods movement, in particular the transfer prices, to the IDoc.
The logic for recognizing the profit center switch functions as follows: At goods issue, the system recognizes that the profit center of the issuing plant is different from the profit center of the receiving plant. The system derives the profit center node from the relevant profit center.
Data Transfer
The IDocs sent by the issuing plant trigger the goods issue postings in the receiving plant.
Background Posting in the Receiving System
The goods receipt is posted in the receiving system using the IDoc. The interface receives the data from the goods issue in the supplying plant. The following processes now run at the recipient:
The system finds the update control for the GR part of the posting.
The goods movement is posted with the new movement type.
During valuation of the goods receipt, the system might, where necessary (UB logic), refer to the values (legal value and the value from the parallel valuation type, if you are using the transfer price function) from the IDoc.
The PO history is updated. The PO history is updated with the material document number from the second part of the GI posting. The GI document number is not stored in the supplying plant, because there is no way to display this document.
In two-step procedures the goods receipt is posted to the stock in transit.
Reversal
You can only reverse this goods issue for the PO using the cancellation transaction in SD. You cannot reverse the GI in Inventory Management.
The material document that is automatically created in the receiving system cannot be canceled. This reversal is triggered by the sending system (the actual reversal of the GI document takes place there) and transmits the data, including the reversal movement type, to the receiving system. No actual reversal is posted in the receiving system, because the material document number of the original document does not exist in this system. This scenario is applicable for cases where you use the two-step procedure (with stock in transit).
Distribution of Batch Master Data and Characteristics
The batch information is transported using the message category BATMAS.
When you create a cross-system goods issue, the system creates the corresponding IDoc using the message category BATMAS.
When the delivery arrives in the target system, the batch and all the information is already present in the system.
Changes to the batch data are also distributed using the message category BATMAS.
The batch can be decoupled in the receiving SAP R/3 system. This means that the batch can have a different status in the receiving system than in the original system. By setting an indicator at material level, you decide whether the batch can be decoupled or whether the batch and all its attributes are copied from the original system. "Decoupled" i.e. "locally independent" batches are no longer distributed from its own system.
The batch data does not need to be available before the physical goods receipt takes place. The goods receipt into the stock in transit does not usually refer to the batch unless you are working with batches with assigned active ingredient values.
If the GI cannot be posted for organizational reasons, for example because the goods cannot be loaded onto a truck until 10pm, then you can post the goods into the GR blocked stock. This stock is also non-batch-specific.
In cases where the GI IDoc arrives before the batch IDoc, then the GI IDoc can be subsequently posted by a periodically scheduled report (transaction BD87). A program like this exists in the SAP standard system. In Customizing for MM Inventory Management (activity Copy, Change Movement Types), you should make settings to define that manual creation of batches at goods receipt is not allowed.
Shipping Notification
The shipping notification is required in the receiving system due to its relevance for MRP. In this way, for example, a change in delivery date determined at goods issue is sent to the receiving system using the shipping notification. The shipping notification can also be used when posting the GR batches.
Reward if found helpfull,
Cheers,
Chaitanya.

Mac mini (late 2014 ) 2.6ghz for photoshop..

hi friends,
i have plan to upgrade a system for basic photo editing in photoshop cs5 or 6... regarding this , i must need speedy open and save the photo files.. i am tired of using old pentium dual core processers in my old p.c.
but i came to know that mac mini is also dual core in this model.. i know the speed difference will definetely blow the old pentium model.. but i have some doubts regarding this i5 dual core model..
1. is this model is hyper threaded ? if so , photoshop will get any benefit of hyper threaded cores?
2. does dual core is enough for photoshop in terms of speedy editing without hanging?
3.do i expect same performance speed of windows PC i5 processor with mac mini i5 models?
i dont play games.. only photoshop and web browsing..
thank you
suresh babu

Generally, it all depends on how heavy duty your Photoshop
work is and how large the images are. If you work with large images
with a multitude of complex filtering layers, the Mini may not
cut it. However, if you just do a layer or 2 with simple image adjustments,
it will be just fine.
One think to note is all the new Mac Minis have integrated graphics.
Many of Photoshop filters and 3rd party plugins heavily leaverage
the graphics specific processing of graphics cards. Although the newer
Intel Iris integrated graphics are much better than earlier generations,
they are no match for a a computer mid range discrete graphics solution with
its own dedicated RAM. Integrated graphics share system memory with everything
else running on the computer.

Where can I find an instructional DVD for Photoshop CS6 that is Mac-compatible. My textbook came with a DVD that's not Mac-compatible. Thanks! Michael

I'm new to Photoshop, and my textbook came with an instructional DVD (for Photoshop CS6) that is not Mac-compatible. Does anyone know where I can find one? Thanks! Michael R.

You should ask in Photoshop General Discussion
This forum is about the Cloud as a delivery process, not about using individual programs
If you start at the Forums Index https://forums.adobe.com/welcome
You will be able to select a forum for the specific Adobe product(s) you use
Click the "down arrow" symbol on the right (where it says All communities) to open the drop down list and scroll

Having my photoshop cs6 crash on me.Here is the error i get:Process: Adobe Photoshop CS6 [331] Path: /Applications/Adobe Photoshop CS6/Adobe Photoshop CS6.app/Contents/MacOS/Adobe Photoshop CS6 Identifier: com.adobe.Photoshop Version: 13.0.5 (13.0.5.44) C

Process: Adobe Photoshop CS6 [331]
Path: /Applications/Adobe Photoshop CS6/Adobe Photoshop CS6.app/Contents/MacOS/Adobe Photoshop CS6
Identifier: com.adobe.Photoshop
Version: 13.0.5 (13.0.5.44)
Code Type: X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process: launchd [134]
User ID: 502
Date/Time: 2013-09-12 07:54:38.278 +0200
OS Version: Mac OS X 10.8.4 (12E55)
Report Version: 10
Interval Since Last Report: 2204068 sec
Crashes Since Last Report: 73
Per-App Interval Since Last Report: 560901 sec
Per-App Crashes Since Last Report: 10
Anonymous UUID: B545C2AE-F185-48E2-0D66-735AD86051CB
Crashed Thread: 0 Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x0000000000000010
VM Regions Near 0x10:
-->

salflyfish,
Because Photoshop is an Adobe product you should be asking on an Adobe product forum or calling Adobe for assistance. Also your profile isn't complete but it does indicate you own a Mac Pro, this is an Intel based iMac forum. If you do have a Mac Pro please re-consider posting there. To complete your profile please click Profile Update, by doing so this helps the volunteers know basics about your system such as which version of OS X is installed, the exact model you own, the amount of installed RAM etc.... Without that information diagnosing an issue is much more difficult.

Problem using Aperture as external editor for Photoshop CS5...

I am having trouble using Aperture as my external editor for Photoshop - if, for example, I select twenty photos and choose "edit in photoshop CS5," for some reason or another, only ten or twelve photos will show up. Some photos are always missing, and there seems to be no rhyme or reason to it. Has anyone else noticed this? It is really frustrating and slowing my workflow down immensely. Any words of advice would be greatly appreciated!

Hi Casey.
First lets make sure we have the flow going the correct way. You are using Aperture, and use PSCS5 as your external editor (external to Aperture). Right?
Second, what size are your Masters? When you use PS directly (not calling it from Aperture) do you regularly open twenty files at a time?
My Masters are about 25 MPix each. PS sizes them in the 140 MB range. Opening twenty of them at once -- for me that's about 3 GB of data -- will probably bog things down. Does the problem occur if you open just, say, five at a time? What's your hardware? How do you have PS set-up?
And -- my top suggestion for improving your work rate: do in Aperture as much of the work as you can, and send out to PS as little as possible. You don't say what kind of work you are doing, but Aperture, for many, suffices for almost all of there photograph processing needs.
Message was edited by: Kirby Krieger -- some minor changes.

Does anyone know how to fix the crash problem for Photoshop CS3 & for Mac OS X 10

Process: Adobe Photoshop CS3 [2065] Path: /Applications/Adobe Photoshop CS3.app/Contents/MacOS/Adobe Photoshop CS3 Identifier: com.adobe.Photoshop Version: 10.0.1 [10.0.1x20071012 [20071012.r.1644 2007/10/12:09:30:00 cutoff; r branch]] (10.0.1) Code Type: X86 (Native) Parent Process: ??? [1] Responsible: Adobe Photoshop CS3 [2065] User ID: 501 Date/Time: 2014-10-30 01:43:13.866 -0700 OS Version: Mac OS X 10.10 (14A389) Report Version: 11 Anonymous UUID: B61A5A30-DAFD-B41C-6086-260621FC4B78 Sleep/Wake UUID: 6871F5C1-3BE4-489F-AF10-8408636D0621 Time Awake Since Boot: 46000 seconds Time Since Wake: 14000 seconds Crashed Thread: 23 Dispatch queue: TFSVolumeInfo::GetSyncGCDQueue -100 (boot) Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV) Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x0000000000000004
TThis is the first part of crash report

CS3 is a very old Adobe product and is not officially supported. Personally, i don't think CS3 will work on Yosemite and even if it does, by any chance, you will face many compatibility and functional issues like above.
It might be a good time for you to upgrade. Creative Cloud pricing and membership plans | Adobe Creative Cloud
~ Arpit

Distributed processing for Photoshop?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for