Distribution Cycle - No valid receiver entries exist.

Hi,
I'm creating a distribution cycle wherein my receiver in the segment is an order. I tried to select a sample with an order type 9A00:Internal orders: Accrual cost accounting. Then I went to the receiving factor tab and it allowed me to enter a portion/percent. However, when I try to select the order type PP01: Standard Production Order and go to the receiving factor tab, the message "No valid receiver entries exist" appears.  May I know what am i missing?
Thanks,
Darrel

Hi,
Do you have internal orders of type PP01 in your system?
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

  • FI-GL allocation - distribution error: no valid receiver entries exist

    When creating an allocation cycle with fixed percentages and distribution defined on own Z-field (exists in table T800D without
    checks) we get Message no. GA109 when going to the receiver tracing factor screen.
    This happens only when entering a range or set for the receiver. With one unique value we get the tracing factor screen.
    This worked before with ranges and sets. As far as we know there are no changes done at the configuration.
    What can trigger this error? Something must be changed, but I have no clue what...
    Can you give me some tips to help me searching?

    Hi Prasada,
    I can change the set I use, so I guess it is not locked ?
    The set consists of 18 single values, from 1 to 18. So I tried with a set with a range 1 to 18, and also without a set and just a range 1 to 18 but that didn't help.
    When I use only 1 value I dont get the error.
    Before we did some tests with the same cycle (same segments and sets) and we didn't had the problem.
    We have the problem now for more than a week.
    Any other suggestions?
    Renaat.
    UPDATE FYI: we had to activate valdiation on the fields used for the allocation
    Strange because we did tests in the sandbox before without these validation on.
    Edited by: Renaat Vanhaverbeke on Nov 6, 2009 10:17 AM

  • Unable to create the Distribution cycle with WBS Element as Receiver

    Dear SAP Friends,
    I am creating the Distribution cycle in KSV1, Sender is Cost center and Receiver is WBS element.
    Once i select Receiving tracing factor Tab i am getting the error like :
    Message :
    No valid receiver entries exist
    Message no. GA015
    Diagnosis
    You have established a group of receivers by entering either intervals or groups in the selection criteria. However, in the master data check, the SAP System cound not find any valid receivers in your selected group.
    System Response
    The single value entry screen is not shown.
    Procedure
    Check your entries for the selection criteria. It is possible that the master data is locked. You can get more info be choosing "Error log...".
    Please let me know how we need to create the Assesment cycle for WBS elements as receivers and Cost centre as Sender.
    Let me know in this Regard ASAP..
    Regards,
    Anand

    We are encountering a simiilar situation related to Cost Center Assessements to a Work Order (Order Category 30) I'm thinking the promble is related to a similar situation that you had with a WBS.
    Thanks,
    Lou

  • Creating Master to show only rows for which valid entries exist in Detai

    I have created a Master-Detail Form in my Apex application based off of views to tables in a private remote Database.
    In the Master-Detail Creation Wizard, at the "Link Master and Detail" page, I specified that the defined Primary Key in the Master Column should be equal to the corresponding Foreign Key in the Detail Column.
    My goal is to have my Master Form only display rows for which a valid corresponding entry exists in the Detail Form. Yet, the above setup returns all of the rows from the Master Table, even where the corresponding Detail entry is blank.
    Can you provide some light on what I'm doing wrong, and how I can accomplish what I want to do?
    Thank you!

    I have created a Master-Detail Form in my Apex application based off of views to tables in a private remote Database.
    In the Master-Detail Creation Wizard, at the "Link Master and Detail" page, I specified that the defined Primary Key in the Master Column should be equal to the corresponding Foreign Key in the Detail Column.
    My goal is to have my Master Form only display rows for which a valid corresponding entry exists in the Detail Form. Yet, the above setup returns all of the rows from the Master Table, even where the corresponding Detail entry is blank.
    Can you provide some light on what I'm doing wrong, and how I can accomplish what I want to do?
    Thank you!

  • Distribution Cycle error: "No Senders have been found"

    Hello,
    I have created a distribution cycle in FAGLGA31 with three segments with the following criteria,
    Sender:
    Account, Profit Centre C postings and Functional Area YB20
    Receiver:
    function area YB20, profit center A: 80%
    functional area YB20, profit center B 20%
    Likewise I have the other 2 segments with different % of distribution.
    But when I am trying to execute the cycle in FAGLGA35, i am getting the error message that "no sender has been found". Please find below the details of the error message. I have checked the cycle completely and all the relevant master data exists. Also transactional data relating to document type SA also exists in the system.
    Cycle 0L2050, start date 20110101, does not include any senders.
    Message no. GA749
    Diagnosis
    No senders were found for cycle 0L2050, starting date 20110101.
    System Response
    It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
    Procedure
    Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for Actual Distribution: General Ledger. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
    If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
    During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
    1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
    Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
    Inheritance Logic for Allocations
    then correct the affected cycle, if required.
    Request help on how to correct this.

    Dear Latha,
    the most common reason for error message GA749 in NewGL allocation is
    that wrong "version" is specified in cycle header. Actual data in NewGL
    is stored with version 001 (RVERS), so please make sure this value is
    specified on cycle header, instead of 000, for example.
    I hope this can help.
    Mauri

  • Distribution Cycle

    Hi all
    When  we are running the Distribution cycle for month of december
    The following warning message is coming
    No valid sender entries were found
    Message no GA710
    But there is entries for month of december for the particular sender cost center,but still cycle is not running for december
    Please let me know where may be the error
    Note- Distribution cycle having 9 segments
    Thanks
    Ansuman
    Edited by: Ansuman mohanty on Feb 1, 2008 9:46 AM

    hi Late reply ,
    try this,
    “debiting the sender with the cost element you have to give crediting any bank account or any other account” in that journal entry for that cost element you will be giving the same cost center which I gave in sender for distribution cycle
    Debit    sender (given in distribution cycle)
    Credit   bank account
    After distribution run it should automatically become
    Credit (sender)
    Debit  (receiver
    Parthu,,,,

  • Distribution cycles

    Dear co experts,
    I have 32 sendor cost centers and i have 2 recivers cost centers
    In this is two recivers i have allocate the cost 80% to one cost centers and 20% to another cost cenetrs.
    In this scenario how to create the distribution cycles.i mean if i create saparate cycles for sendors cost centers or only one cycle is sufficient
    Kindly help me on this scenario.
    Regards
    venkataswamy

    Hi,
    create only one distribution cycle using TCODE: KSV1 is enough for you requirment.
    there first give the cycle name and the date valid from.  then in the follwong screen enter the cycle name text . after that clcik on the attached segment button. give the segment name ,text.
    in sender heeder tab:
    sender rule :posted amount
    share:100%
    radio button =actual.
    receiver rule= fixed percentages
    var.portion type : actual cost.
    in sender/receiver tab :
    sender:
    cost center : here give the cost center group ( first create teh 32 sender cost centers as one group using tcode: KSH1)
    cost elemnet : give cost element group or the cost element range.
    receiver:
    cost center: group the 2 receiver cost centers ( or if they are in range give teh range).
    receiver tracing TAB:
    give the percentage : 80 and 20 for the respective cost centers.
    hope its helpful.
    thanks.

  • Distribution cycle Error

    Hi
    When I run the distribution cycle i am getting the error message " the segment contails no receivers" our version is ECC 5.0, is there any correction or any OSS notes would help to fix this error, i checkded the OSS but all the corrections are for previous versions
    Appreciate for any help.
    Thank you.

    If this is the problem relating to distributing based on Net Sales, what have you defined as your receivers?
    The way distribution based on Net Sales works is:
    1. It looks for the Tracing Factor - in your case, it is Actual Statistical Posting.
    2. It checks to see if the Receivers have any such postings - so if you are distributing costs from one Cost Centre to another Cost Centre, make sure the receiving Cost Centre has some Actual Statistical Postings of Revenue (which should again match the Cost Elements you defined for the Tracing Factor).
    3. It then calculates the amount to be Distributed based on the Net Sales values in the receiving Cost Centre and the Receiver Tracing Factor weightage defined by you - thus, if you allocated 10% as the weightage and the Net Sales value in the Cost Centre is $3000, it will allocate $300 to that Cost Centre.
    If you are getting a no valid receivers error, try posting some Actual Revenues to the Receiving Cost Centre before you run your distribution.
    Cheers.

  • PXE problem - \boot\BCD 0x0000098 does not contain a valid OS entry

    I am setting up PXE on my SCCM 2012 server.  I have a seperate DHCP server running WDS(unconfigured).  I have DHCP option 66 and 67 set  (\boot\x86\wdsnbp.com).
    I have PXE configured to recognize unknown computers.  The deployment assigned to the unknown computers collection.  And confirmed that the boot images are on the distribution point (only 1 distribution point in enviroment).  I do not have
    a SMSPXE.log on sccm server if that is any indication of anything.
    My workstation boots PXE, I hit F12 and it sees the PXE server.
    I get a b/w screen...
    Windows boot Manager (Server IP : <IP of SCCM box> )
    Windows has failed to start. A recent hardware or software change might be the cause. To fix the problem:
    1. Insert your windows installation disc and restart your computer
    2. Choose your language settings, and then click "Next."
    3.  Click "Repair your computer."
    If you do not have this disk, contact your system administrator or your computer
    manufactuer for assistance.
    File: \Boot\BCD
    Status : 0x0000098
    Info: The Windows Boot Configuration Data file does not contain a valid OS entry.
    Any suggestions to what might be the issue?
    Thanks,
    Kubie

    Unfortunately I am in exactly the same situation but under slightly different circumstances.
    We recently took delivery of 10 new systems, whilst developing a new/updated answer file the first two machines used have now developed this fault. They have been re-imaged several times, roughtly on its fouth deplyment the local machine entered this state
    and we cant seem to get rid.
    However any new system that hasn’t been used already is deploying correctly.
    Ideas?
    DHCP is MS / options:
    066 Boot Server host Name: [FQDN name of the WDS server]
    067 Bootfile Name: \boot\x86\wdsnbp.com  (the systems and boot file we wish to use are x64)
    FYI:
    WDS is on same LAN subnet.
    WDS is Win 2008 R2
    - StatoLNL
    On the 'broken' systems, try booting from USB media and then from a command prompt run diskpart and clean the disk.  Then power off and try PXE again.  I believe the clue is in the error message that the BCD store is kaput.
    Andy
    My Personal Blog: http://madluka.wordpress.com

  • MDT 0xc0000098 The windows boot configuration data file does not contain a valid OS entry

    hello,
    i installed WDS+MDT for OS deployment. all was working fine.
    Now i need our branch office to be able to deploy OS as well.
    I installed a new Win 2008R2 server, and installed the WDS service on it.
    When reading about this on the internet i saw i need, on the MDT at our main office, to make a link, under "Advanced Configuration" - "Linked Deployment Shares" to the new WDS server (I used this: http://www.balm.se/?p=115")
    when doing so i entered the UNC path to the new server and then, on the created link, i right click and choose "Replicate now".
    after doing so, i tried booting a laptop just to see if there is any impact, and now, I'm getting this error:
    Windows failed to start. A recent hardware or software change might be the cause. To fix the problem:
    1. insert your windows installation disk and restart your computer
    2. choose your language, and then click "Next"
    3. Click "Repair your computer"
    If you do not have this disc, contact your system administrator or computer manufacturer for assistance.
    File: \Boot\BCD
    Status: 0xc0000098
    Info: The windows Boot Configuration Data file does not contain a valid OS entry.
    I know that usually when I'm getting this message, it means that a previous MDT installation was started and did not finished correctly, and the are some [stuff] on the HD, so i do a partition erase and start over and all working fine.
    Now it's not working. I tried several computer, even new ones, and NADA.
    someone know the cause?
    I know I read something, i don't remember where or how to find it, that when doing the steps I did, it alter\change some ini or xml, or something like this. is that true? any one know on what file do i need to look and see if something is misconfigured?
    thanks a lot for your help

    hello,
    i installed WDS+MDT for OS deployment. all was working fine.
    Now i need our branch office to be able to deploy OS as well.
    I installed a new Win 2008R2 server, and installed the WDS service on it.
    When reading about this on the internet i saw i need, on the MDT at our main office, to make a link, under "Advanced Configuration" - "Linked Deployment Shares" to the new WDS server (I used this: http://www.balm.se/?p=115")
    when doing so i entered the UNC path to the new server and then, on the created link, i right click and choose "Replicate now".
    after doing so, i tried booting a laptop just to see if there is any impact, and now, I'm getting this error:
    Windows failed to start. A recent hardware or software change might be the cause. To fix the problem:
    1. insert your windows installation disk and restart your computer
    2. choose your language, and then click "Next"
    3. Click "Repair your computer"
    If you do not have this disc, contact your system administrator or computer manufacturer for assistance.
    File: \Boot\BCD
    Status: 0xc0000098
    Info: The windows Boot Configuration Data file does not contain a valid OS entry.
    I know that usually when I'm getting this message, it means that a previous MDT installation was started and did not finished correctly, and the are some [stuff] on the HD, so i do a partition erase and start over and all working fine.
    Now it's not working. I tried several computer, even new ones, and NADA.
    someone know the cause?
    I know I read something, i don't remember where or how to find it, that when doing the steps I did, it alter\change some ini or xml, or something like this. is that true? any one know on what file do i need to look and see if something is misconfigured?
    thanks a lot for your help
    For a branch solution I would use DFS(R) rather than linked deploymentshares.
    If there is infrastructure at the remote sites you could use the MDT environment at your main site, and  then at each other site use an existing server or build a new server (VM is available). Create a Deploymentshare on each sever
    and copy the contents of the MDT environment from the first site into this share.  Next you will have to add the WDS service to each site's server. For WDS add the boot image. Of course as Keith noted ensure that you
    have the same versions of MDT and the WAIK/ADK on all systems
    You can use DFS to replicate to all of the other sites, but you will still have to create a deploymentshare, and install WDS at each site. So each site talks to its own WDS server you can use the DefaultGateway parameter instead -
    [Settings]
    Priority=Default, DefaultGateway
    [Default]
    SkipBDDWelcome=YES
    [DefaultGateway]
    192.168.10.1=Bergen
    192.168.20.1=Oslo
    [Bergen]
    DeployRoot=\\MDT-Bergen\DeploymentShare$
    [Oslo]
    DeployRoot=\\MDT-Oslo\DeploymentShare$
    If this post is helpful please click "Mark for answer", thanks! Kind regards

  • Curreny posted in Distribution Cycle

    Hi,
        I have created a distribution cycle which makes up to USD a local currency of USD 100,000 and document currency SGD 75,000. The distribution cycle shows correctly both currencies in the sender and receiver.
       However, when I looked at the GL balance of the distributed GL account, the distribution document shows USD in both Local currency and document currency.
                        Local Currency                Document Currency
      Sender 1         100,000 (USD)                 75,000 (SGD)
      Sender 1         -100,000 (USD)               -100,000 (USD)
      Receiver 1          60,000 (USD)                60,000 (USD)
      Receiver 2         40,000 (USD)                 40,000 (USD)
      In distribution, it is possible to have SGD equivalent posted to the receiver cost centers in the document currency field ?
      Regards,
      Leslie

    Hello Ajay,
    Thank you soo much for your quick response. Yes i have assigned the cost element category in KA06. After assigning the cost element i did test run (KSUB). It is not showing any values in the sender/Receiver. I need to post the planned values. Could you please tell me the procedure what to do to see the values assinged to sender/receiver 50%-50%.
    Sincere regards.

  • Distribution cycle for cost centers

    Hi,
       I have created a distribution cycle for cost centers using SKF. I have even created document using KB31N. based on this document the sender  should have some amount after executing the distribution cycle, but here the sender value is completely distributed to recievers leading to incorrect results.
    Can any one help me solve this?
    Thanks,
    Sravanthi

    Hello
    Pls check the rule once again.
    You use allocation rules to determine how amounts and quantities are allocated between sender objects (sender values) and receiver objects (receiver tracing factor). The rules for the allocation types are made up of sender and receiver rules.
    Sender rules
    Determination of the sender values for the distribution/assessment can occur according to the following rules:
    Posted amounts
    Fixed amounts
    Fixed rates
    Receiver rules
    Determination of the sender values for the distribution/assessment can occur according to the following rules:
    Variable portions
    Fixed amounts
    Fixed percentages
    Fixed portions
    Reg
    assign points if useful

  • Assign Functional area to Profit Center Distribution Cycle postings

    Hi All,
    I am using a NEW GL distribution cycle (Tran Code : FAGLGA35) for distributing balances in the Dummy Profit center to relevent Profit centers.
    My Company is using Functional area for FIN STAT Ver and other reportings. When I run the profit center distribution cycle, it distirbutes the amounts but doesnot assign the Functional areas to the posting. Is there a way I can pass the functional area of the relevent postings of the accounts to the postings of each distribution postings.
    Thanks
    MKR

    Dear MKR,
    Thank you for using the SAP SDN Forums,
    In this particular case, you could have a look at the following to
    see if it helps you, but I have not tested this for your case
    so it is not being offered as a definite solution:
    You could look at using FAGL_ALLO_SUBSTITUTE which might be able to
    help you to get the results that you want.
    Due to the inheritance logic in allocation, if you set "transfer
    field" option active for the field (T811I-INHER), the system copies
    the sender value to the receiver if the receive value is not specified.
    Please refer to SAP Help portal:
       http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/40/e1510735f30baee10000000a114cbd/frameset.htm
    You can deactivate "transfer field" flag in customizing
    and use BAdI : FAGL_ALLO_SUBSTITUTE to substitute the intended
    functional area. (This BAdI is the "official" way to substitute any
    field during allocation, rather than OBBH substitution.)
    I hope this may be of some assistance in resolving the issue.
    Kind Regards,
    Brendan

  • Distribution Cycle: Cost Centre is a mandatory field for GL Acct

    hello,
    When I am executing the distribution cycle in FAGLGA35 in update mode I am getting the error (Message no. F5808) "Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account xxxxxx" as detailed below:
    Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account 2050 599030
    Message no. F5808
    Diagnosis
    The value for field "Cost Ctr" in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "599030" in company code "2050" linked to the field selection for posting key "40".
    System Response
    Error
    Procedure
    It might be an error in the configuration of the G/L account field selection. The initial application, used to call up the interface must otherwise define a value for field "Cost Ctr". If this is the case, contact the consultant responsible for the application used to call up the interface or get in contact with SAP directly.
    As per the Field Status Group assigned to the master data of this GL Account, cost centre is an required entry. Further I am not able to change the Field status Group of this GL since this GL acct contains some balance.
    Could someone please help me on how to overcome this issue.
    Regards,
    Lavanya

    Hello Ravi,
    Thanks for your response.
    I have tried the option you have provided but user donot want to use the OKB9 option and neither she wants to change the field status group of the GL Acct by which Cost Centre can made an optional field.
    Can you please tell me if we can integrate a cost center in the distribution cycle so that the allocation can be done also for accounts for which a cost center is mandatory ? We can define a cost centre that will be used only for this allocation and that will be the same for all the accounts.
    Request your inputs on this.
    Regards,
    Lavanya

  • Distribution cycle problem

    Hi,
    I created Distribution cycle dated on 27.06.2010 through KSV1. During execution through KSV5 put period 1 to 3, fiscal year 2010, cycle name and start date ie. creation date of distribution i.e, 27.06.2010, tick on test run and details list. During execution it gives as "Cycle SER is not valid on 1.4.2010". What may be possible reason ?
    Regards,
    Anindita

    Dear Somar,
    As per your suggestion i have changed the start date which is between 1 to 3 period. Start date is 27.06.2010 or 30.06.2010. Still it is showing same error as 'Cycle SER is not valid on 01.04.2010'. Even if i change the period from 3 to 3 it shows as ''Cycle SER is not valid on 01.06.2010'.
    Regards,
    Anindita

Maybe you are looking for

  • HT204370 My movies no longer play after upgrade

    Can someone please help?  I upgraded my computer to Win 7.  Since the upgrade I can no longer play my movies that I bought through the itunes store, nor can I sync them onto my ipod classic.  I have been watching these movies on this same Ipod for ye

  • How do I fix the following error: the registry settings used by the iTunes drivers for importing and burning CDs and DVDs are missing?

    Lately whenever I open iTunes, I get that same error message.  At the end of the message it suggests re-installing iTunes, but this didn't correct the error.  I looked up the problem on the help and support website and found several articles describi

  • Install Lightroom and Photoshop on 2 Mac's

    Have purchased a copy of lightroom and photoshop and they are installed in my Mac. Understand that the license permits installing these on my new laptop also. Is this correct? If so, how do I get a copy for my laptop?

  • Fall back of master to slave

    we have uccx 7.0, the master server (publisher) falls back to slave as soon as we have 20 agents in queue. And agents keep on logging out as soon as we have around 20 calls in queue again; what could be the posssible reason for it. We have enough lic

  • Raid ... Exactly what can the RAID do with the TD230

    Hi, Have a bunch of TD23013U's and the newer TD23019U's. They both come with RAID, Intel onboard and a LSI9240-8i. Q: Out of the box, can the onboard Intel RAID do RAID 5 or is a separate key required for it (part no please and FRU number?).....I tak