Distribution cycle problem
Hi,
I created Distribution cycle dated on 27.06.2010 through KSV1. During execution through KSV5 put period 1 to 3, fiscal year 2010, cycle name and start date ie. creation date of distribution i.e, 27.06.2010, tick on test run and details list. During execution it gives as "Cycle SER is not valid on 1.4.2010". What may be possible reason ?
Regards,
Anindita
Dear Somar,
As per your suggestion i have changed the start date which is between 1 to 3 period. Start date is 27.06.2010 or 30.06.2010. Still it is showing same error as 'Cycle SER is not valid on 01.04.2010'. Even if i change the period from 3 to 3 it shows as ''Cycle SER is not valid on 01.06.2010'.
Regards,
Anindita
Similar Messages
-
Distribution Cycle error: "No Senders have been found"
Hello,
I have created a distribution cycle in FAGLGA31 with three segments with the following criteria,
Sender:
Account, Profit Centre C postings and Functional Area YB20
Receiver:
function area YB20, profit center A: 80%
functional area YB20, profit center B 20%
Likewise I have the other 2 segments with different % of distribution.
But when I am trying to execute the cycle in FAGLGA35, i am getting the error message that "no sender has been found". Please find below the details of the error message. I have checked the cycle completely and all the relevant master data exists. Also transactional data relating to document type SA also exists in the system.
Cycle 0L2050, start date 20110101, does not include any senders.
Message no. GA749
Diagnosis
No senders were found for cycle 0L2050, starting date 20110101.
System Response
It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for Actual Distribution: General Ledger. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
Inheritance Logic for Allocations
then correct the affected cycle, if required.
Request help on how to correct this.Dear Latha,
the most common reason for error message GA749 in NewGL allocation is
that wrong "version" is specified in cycle header. Actual data in NewGL
is stored with version 001 (RVERS), so please make sure this value is
specified on cycle header, instead of 000, for example.
I hope this can help.
Mauri -
Distribution cycle error in PCA
Hi All,
I have an issue.
Through user defined layout, the Statistical key figures have been
updated into the Profit Center Accounting.
Then when the Distribution Cycle is run on the basis of Statistical Key
Figures, it is not happening giving an error saying the system could
not find the receivers. Kindly give necessary
inputs so that I can solve this problem.
Solution will be rewarded.
Regards,
Karthick Scheck stastical key creation. when you create stastical key figure if you have given fixed value there is no need to post document every month. if variable key figure is given post document every month. check for this
-
Distribution cycle posting incorrect
Hello
We have just upgraded to ECC 6 and are facing an issue in OCtober months Distribution cycle.
An SKF is created with following values costcenter A 336 units, cost center B 440 units and Cost center C 500 units. The distribution cycle is defined correctly and till september was posting correctly.
Now in October post the upgrade when the distribution cycle is run it picks up the indirect cost (total amount 25 million) and posts only 23 million, further even this 23 million it posts incorrectly i.e correct value should have been 23mil/1276 units X 336,440 & 500 units respectively.
However its is posting very weird values like in Cc A 100,000 & B 15 milion & balance in CC 3.
I'am unable to understand why it has picked 23 million i/of 25 million which is the actual cost to be distrbuted and further why the distribution is not matching to the SKF document posted.
this problem has come post the upgrade from 4.7 to ECC6, Could you help us out
Thanks
NelsonHello
Thanks for your suggestion, have checked all the settings for the cycle nothing has changed. I've been able to trace the computation of the posting made using runtime analysis.
In the particular instance what has happened is at the time of allocation the system has doubled the quantity in SKF document and posted the allocation basis this. fo eg in my SKF document the for Cost center A, B C the qty defined was 49, 9, 115 units at the time of allocation it has been considered as 98,18 and 230 units. This has happened for all the cost centers barring one defined in the SKF document.
Any idea why this would have happened.
Thanks
Nelson -
Hi
When I run the distribution cycle i am getting the error message " the segment contails no receivers" our version is ECC 5.0, is there any correction or any OSS notes would help to fix this error, i checkded the OSS but all the corrections are for previous versions
Appreciate for any help.
Thank you.If this is the problem relating to distributing based on Net Sales, what have you defined as your receivers?
The way distribution based on Net Sales works is:
1. It looks for the Tracing Factor - in your case, it is Actual Statistical Posting.
2. It checks to see if the Receivers have any such postings - so if you are distributing costs from one Cost Centre to another Cost Centre, make sure the receiving Cost Centre has some Actual Statistical Postings of Revenue (which should again match the Cost Elements you defined for the Tracing Factor).
3. It then calculates the amount to be Distributed based on the Net Sales values in the receiving Cost Centre and the Receiver Tracing Factor weightage defined by you - thus, if you allocated 10% as the weightage and the Net Sales value in the Cost Centre is $3000, it will allocate $300 to that Cost Centre.
If you are getting a no valid receivers error, try posting some Actual Revenues to the Receiving Cost Centre before you run your distribution.
Cheers. -
ok i have cycle problem hope someone can help me
the user will pick from the following
Date: 12/10/2007
Time: 09:00
Frequency: monthly
Cycles: 12
so all i need to do now is insert into my table 12 records
but the problem i have is how can i loop through each date
ie
the above form entry would be
12/10/2007 / 09:00
12/11/2007 / 09:00
12/12/2007 / 09:00 etc 12 times
but how can i reference a calendar to get the exact date for
each entry and the same if my form Frequency was
daily
weekly
fortnightly
monthly
yearlyok that works but only i need the orginal date in the loop ie
if i select date 10/12/2007 and
a frequency of ww
and 2 cycles
my output is 17/12/2007, 24/12/2007
so i need the orginal to be outputted aswell?
<cfset startday = '#form.SMS_Date#'>
<CFLOOP INDEX="cnt" FROM="1" TO="#form.cycles#">
<CFSET nextday = DateAdd("#form.Frequency#", 1,
startday)>
<CFSET startday = '#DateFormat(nextday,
"dd/mm/yyyy")#'> -
Unable to create the Distribution cycle with WBS Element as Receiver
Dear SAP Friends,
I am creating the Distribution cycle in KSV1, Sender is Cost center and Receiver is WBS element.
Once i select Receiving tracing factor Tab i am getting the error like :
Message :
No valid receiver entries exist
Message no. GA015
Diagnosis
You have established a group of receivers by entering either intervals or groups in the selection criteria. However, in the master data check, the SAP System cound not find any valid receivers in your selected group.
System Response
The single value entry screen is not shown.
Procedure
Check your entries for the selection criteria. It is possible that the master data is locked. You can get more info be choosing "Error log...".
Please let me know how we need to create the Assesment cycle for WBS elements as receivers and Cost centre as Sender.
Let me know in this Regard ASAP..
Regards,
AnandWe are encountering a simiilar situation related to Cost Center Assessements to a Work Order (Order Category 30) I'm thinking the promble is related to a similar situation that you had with a WBS.
Thanks,
Lou -
Assessment and Distribution Cycles
Hi
We are yet to carry forward the GL account balances (both balance sheet and PL) from 2008 to 2009 in FI module.
Can we run the assessment and the distribution cycles for the month of January without carrying the GL account balances to 2009? OR do we need to carry the GL account balances first to run the two cycles
ThanksHi Trishan,
It's not a good idea to run distibution and assessment before carrying forward GL balances. You can check the documentation in help.sap.com. Please check note 110249. This note gives you additional advantage in balance carry forward and distribution. For FI-SL, EC-PCA and FI-GL, the same balance carry forward program is used.
Regards,
Abhisek -
Curreny posted in Distribution Cycle
Hi,
I have created a distribution cycle which makes up to USD a local currency of USD 100,000 and document currency SGD 75,000. The distribution cycle shows correctly both currencies in the sender and receiver.
However, when I looked at the GL balance of the distributed GL account, the distribution document shows USD in both Local currency and document currency.
Local Currency Document Currency
Sender 1 100,000 (USD) 75,000 (SGD)
Sender 1 -100,000 (USD) -100,000 (USD)
Receiver 1 60,000 (USD) 60,000 (USD)
Receiver 2 40,000 (USD) 40,000 (USD)
In distribution, it is possible to have SGD equivalent posted to the receiver cost centers in the document currency field ?
Regards,
LeslieHello Ajay,
Thank you soo much for your quick response. Yes i have assigned the cost element category in KA06. After assigning the cost element i did test run (KSUB). It is not showing any values in the sender/Receiver. I need to post the planned values. Could you please tell me the procedure what to do to see the values assinged to sender/receiver 50%-50%.
Sincere regards. -
Distribution cycle for cost centers
Hi,
I have created a distribution cycle for cost centers using SKF. I have even created document using KB31N. based on this document the sender should have some amount after executing the distribution cycle, but here the sender value is completely distributed to recievers leading to incorrect results.
Can any one help me solve this?
Thanks,
SravanthiHello
Pls check the rule once again.
You use allocation rules to determine how amounts and quantities are allocated between sender objects (sender values) and receiver objects (receiver tracing factor). The rules for the allocation types are made up of sender and receiver rules.
Sender rules
Determination of the sender values for the distribution/assessment can occur according to the following rules:
Posted amounts
Fixed amounts
Fixed rates
Receiver rules
Determination of the sender values for the distribution/assessment can occur according to the following rules:
Variable portions
Fixed amounts
Fixed percentages
Fixed portions
Reg
assign points if useful -
Functional Area derivation as obligatory checkbox in Cost Center distribution cycle?
Dear All,
We are using Cost of Sales accounting with FI-CO online integration. Derivation of Functional Area for Cost Center assessment cycles is an obligatory indicator. Nevertheless I may create Cos Center distribution cycles without this option (what affects FI-CO online integration). Can anybody explain a system logic behind it?
Can I set Functional Area derivation as an obligatory checkbox for Cost Center distribution cycles too?
Bartlomiej SeidelHi,
I have searched for any useful note, but without result so far. The point is that any new distribution or assessment cycle (cost centers) in our company must work with Functional Area derivation (than FI-CO online integration works correctly). With our current SAP setup I must select this indicator for every assessment cycle - it is obligatory. But is not obligatory for distribution cycles - and I don't know why?
I would like to protect everybody from crating distribution cycles without FA derivation indicator (like it works now for assessment cycles). How may I do it?
Bart -
Assign Functional area to Profit Center Distribution Cycle postings
Hi All,
I am using a NEW GL distribution cycle (Tran Code : FAGLGA35) for distributing balances in the Dummy Profit center to relevent Profit centers.
My Company is using Functional area for FIN STAT Ver and other reportings. When I run the profit center distribution cycle, it distirbutes the amounts but doesnot assign the Functional areas to the posting. Is there a way I can pass the functional area of the relevent postings of the accounts to the postings of each distribution postings.
Thanks
MKRDear MKR,
Thank you for using the SAP SDN Forums,
In this particular case, you could have a look at the following to
see if it helps you, but I have not tested this for your case
so it is not being offered as a definite solution:
You could look at using FAGL_ALLO_SUBSTITUTE which might be able to
help you to get the results that you want.
Due to the inheritance logic in allocation, if you set "transfer
field" option active for the field (T811I-INHER), the system copies
the sender value to the receiver if the receive value is not specified.
Please refer to SAP Help portal:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/40/e1510735f30baee10000000a114cbd/frameset.htm
You can deactivate "transfer field" flag in customizing
and use BAdI : FAGL_ALLO_SUBSTITUTE to substitute the intended
functional area. (This BAdI is the "official" way to substitute any
field during allocation, rather than OBBH substitution.)
I hope this may be of some assistance in resolving the issue.
Kind Regards,
Brendan -
Tables for amount of document against assessment cycle & distribution cycle
Hi,
Please let me know in which table the transaction value of document(s) are updated in CO module when we run the assessment cycle & distribution cycle ( through T Code - KSV5 OR KSU5).
With regards,
B.PadhyHi,
The documents are updated in COEP table.
Regards,
Eli -
Distribution Cycle: Cost Centre is a mandatory field for GL Acct
hello,
When I am executing the distribution cycle in FAGLGA35 in update mode I am getting the error (Message no. F5808) "Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account xxxxxx" as detailed below:
Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account 2050 599030
Message no. F5808
Diagnosis
The value for field "Cost Ctr" in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "599030" in company code "2050" linked to the field selection for posting key "40".
System Response
Error
Procedure
It might be an error in the configuration of the G/L account field selection. The initial application, used to call up the interface must otherwise define a value for field "Cost Ctr". If this is the case, contact the consultant responsible for the application used to call up the interface or get in contact with SAP directly.
As per the Field Status Group assigned to the master data of this GL Account, cost centre is an required entry. Further I am not able to change the Field status Group of this GL since this GL acct contains some balance.
Could someone please help me on how to overcome this issue.
Regards,
LavanyaHello Ravi,
Thanks for your response.
I have tried the option you have provided but user donot want to use the OKB9 option and neither she wants to change the field status group of the GL Acct by which Cost Centre can made an optional field.
Can you please tell me if we can integrate a cost center in the distribution cycle so that the allocation can be done also for accounts for which a cost center is mandatory ? We can define a cost centre that will be used only for this allocation and that will be the same for all the accounts.
Request your inputs on this.
Regards,
Lavanya -
Distribution Cycle KSV5 Resulting in error when deselected the test run chk
Hi Experts,
Please help me out
iam getting an error while running a Distribution Cycle KSV5 Resulting in error when deselected the test run chk box.
When run the same in the test run, there isn't any error log. but when i deselect the same & run iam getting an error like
First Message:
Balance per segment 9999 is not zero
Message no. FAGL_COFI025
Diagnosis
Balance per segment 9999 is not zero.
The balance on segment 9999 is 50.00 (transaction currency), 0.00 (object currency), and 50.00 (controlling area currency).
System Response
With the standard settings, postings cannot be made to the document because the balance for segment and partner segment does not amount to zero. This may be due to a programming error, or this setting may have been made (perhaps unintentionally) in the BAdIs for determining the segment or partner segment.
Procedure
If there is a programming error, please inform your system administrator.
If this behavior is intentional, you can deactivate error message FAGL_COFI 025 in Customizing or change the error message into a warning message or an information message.
2nd Message
Balance per segment 1000 is not zero
Message no. FAGL_COFI025
Diagnosis
Balance per segment 1000 is not zero.
The balance on segment 1000 is 50.00- (transaction currency), 0.00 (object currency), and 50.00- (controlling area currency).
System Response
With the standard settings, postings cannot be made to the document because the balance for segment and partner segment does not amount to zero. This may be due to a programming error, or this setting may have been made (perhaps unintentionally) in the BAdIs for determining the segment or partner segment.
Procedure
If there is a programming error, please inform your system administrator.
If this behavior is intentional, you can deactivate error message FAGL_COFI 025 in Customizing or change the error message into a warning message or an information message.
3rd Message
No update performed due to an error
Message no. GA719
Diagnosis
A serious error occurred during processing.
System Response
Processing is continued as far as possible, but results are not posted.
Procedure
This error is shown in the error list before this error message. Here you can find more information about this particular error.
I would appreciate an early reply........!!!
Thanks & Regards,
NeelaHi,
Check notes 764652 and 897086; it might be helpful.
Regards,
Eli
Maybe you are looking for
-
Not able to Install MS SQL 2008 R2 64 -Bit
Hi All, I am Installing fresh Setup Of MSSQL 2008 R2 On my Server (Microsoft Server 2008 R2 Standard SP1 64 Bit ) which is domain Controlled. But With Administrative rights I am not able to Install. it shows Following error , POLICY .8.0.Microsoft.V
-
Sending CPU Statistic report every 5 min.
Hi All, Can anyone tell me how can I send Router's CPU utilization report to a particular mail id in a certain time interval using event manager applet?
-
Hi, I have exported my application from one server to my new apex installation on another server. Export works fine but i don't have any more my pics downloaded in images in shared components. Can someone tell how can i get them? Thx in advance. Celi
-
I've written an applet that has three checkboxes and three textboxes. I've imbedded that applet inside a jsp. When the user checks one of the checkboxes, how do I check for that inside the jsp? Having determined which checkbox was chosen, I need to s
-
Recovery of table without archive file no 1,2 and 3
Hi all, long back I had created a table. Recently one user has dropped the table by mistake. When I am looking for the archived file, I saw that, I have only file no 5,6 and 7 but file no. 1 and 2 are missing. Because of that reason, I am unable to r