Distribution Cycle

Hi all
When we are running the Distribution cycle for month of december
The following warning message is coming
No valid sender entries were found
Message no GA710
But there is entries for month of december for the particular sender cost center,but still cycle is not running for december
Please let me know where may be the error
Note- Distribution cycle having 9 segments
Thanks
Ansuman
Edited by: Ansuman mohanty on Feb 1, 2008 9:46 AM

hi Late reply ,
try this,
debiting the sender with the cost element you have to give crediting any bank account or any other account in that journal entry for that cost element you will be giving the same cost center which I gave in sender for distribution cycle
Debit sender (given in distribution cycle)
Credit bank account
After distribution run it should automatically become
Credit (sender)
Debit (receiver
Parthu,,,,

Similar Messages

Unable to create the Distribution cycle with WBS Element as Receiver

Dear SAP Friends,
I am creating the Distribution cycle in KSV1, Sender is Cost center and Receiver is WBS element.
Once i select Receiving tracing factor Tab i am getting the error like :
Message :
No valid receiver entries exist
Message no. GA015
Diagnosis
You have established a group of receivers by entering either intervals or groups in the selection criteria. However, in the master data check, the SAP System cound not find any valid receivers in your selected group.
System Response
The single value entry screen is not shown.
Procedure
Check your entries for the selection criteria. It is possible that the master data is locked. You can get more info be choosing "Error log...".
Please let me know how we need to create the Assesment cycle for WBS elements as receivers and Cost centre as Sender.
Let me know in this Regard ASAP..
Regards,
Anand

We are encountering a simiilar situation related to Cost Center Assessements to a Work Order (Order Category 30) I'm thinking the promble is related to a similar situation that you had with a WBS.
Thanks,
Lou

Distribution Cycle error: "No Senders have been found"

Hello,
I have created a distribution cycle in FAGLGA31 with three segments with the following criteria,
Sender:
Account, Profit Centre C postings and Functional Area YB20
Receiver:
function area YB20, profit center A: 80%
functional area YB20, profit center B 20%
Likewise I have the other 2 segments with different % of distribution.
But when I am trying to execute the cycle in FAGLGA35, i am getting the error message that "no sender has been found". Please find below the details of the error message. I have checked the cycle completely and all the relevant master data exists. Also transactional data relating to document type SA also exists in the system.
Cycle 0L2050, start date 20110101, does not include any senders.
Message no. GA749
Diagnosis
No senders were found for cycle 0L2050, starting date 20110101.
System Response
It is no longer possible to create receivers and assign senders for the segment.
Procedure
Check the definition of the cycle in the maintenance transaction for Actual Distribution: General Ledger. No valid sender cost centers could be found to match your selection.
If you use the sender rules "Posted amounts" or "Posted quantities", check whether records exist in the database for the criteria you entered (cost element, version...)
During indirect activity allocation with the sender rule "posted quantities", you should also note that only the difference between the planned/posted activity allocation and the scheduled activity quantity is allocated. If you entered activity types as sender, you should at this point also check the activity type category. For those quantities posted with an activity type of category 1 (manual entry, manual allocation) no indirect activity allocation is possible.
1. If this is an allocation in the FI/FI-SL area, the problem could also be due to the inheritance logic for FI-SL totals tables, whose "Inheritance of sender based on the receiver" indicator is activated in the "Partner object update" view (T811U-INHERSRC). These are tables that were installed before Release 4.6A.
Use transaction GCA8 to check this, and see the section on:
Inheritance Logic for Allocations
then correct the affected cycle, if required.
Request help on how to correct this.

Dear Latha,
the most common reason for error message GA749 in NewGL allocation is
that wrong "version" is specified in cycle header. Actual data in NewGL
is stored with version 001 (RVERS), so please make sure this value is
specified on cycle header, instead of 000, for example.
I hope this can help.
Mauri

Assessment and Distribution Cycles

Hi
We are yet to carry forward the GL account balances (both balance sheet and PL) from 2008 to 2009 in FI module.
Can we run the assessment and the distribution cycles for the month of January without carrying the GL account balances to 2009? OR do we need to carry the GL account balances first to run the two cycles
Thanks

Hi Trishan,
It's not a good idea to run distibution and assessment before carrying forward GL balances. You can check the documentation in help.sap.com. Please check note 110249. This note gives you additional advantage in balance carry forward and distribution. For FI-SL, EC-PCA and FI-GL, the same balance carry forward program is used.
Regards,
Abhisek

Curreny posted in Distribution Cycle

Hi,
    I have created a distribution cycle which makes up to USD a local currency of USD 100,000 and document currency SGD 75,000. The distribution cycle shows correctly both currencies in the sender and receiver.
   However, when I looked at the GL balance of the distributed GL account, the distribution document shows USD in both Local currency and document currency.
                    Local Currency                Document Currency
Sender 1         100,000 (USD)                 75,000 (SGD)
Sender 1         -100,000 (USD)               -100,000 (USD)
Receiver 1          60,000 (USD)                60,000 (USD)
Receiver 2         40,000 (USD)                 40,000 (USD)
In distribution, it is possible to have SGD equivalent posted to the receiver cost centers in the document currency field ?
Regards,
Leslie

Hello Ajay,
Thank you soo much for your quick response. Yes i have assigned the cost element category in KA06. After assigning the cost element i did test run (KSUB). It is not showing any values in the sender/Receiver. I need to post the planned values. Could you please tell me the procedure what to do to see the values assinged to sender/receiver 50%-50%.
Sincere regards.

Distribution cycle for cost centers

Hi,
I have created a distribution cycle for cost centers using SKF. I have even created document using KB31N. based on this document the sender should have some amount after executing the distribution cycle, but here the sender value is completely distributed to recievers leading to incorrect results.
Can any one help me solve this?
Thanks,
Sravanthi

Hello
Pls check the rule once again.
You use allocation rules to determine how amounts and quantities are allocated between sender objects (sender values) and receiver objects (receiver tracing factor). The rules for the allocation types are made up of sender and receiver rules.
Sender rules
Determination of the sender values for the distribution/assessment can occur according to the following rules:
Posted amounts
Fixed amounts
Fixed rates
Receiver rules
Determination of the sender values for the distribution/assessment can occur according to the following rules:
Variable portions
Fixed amounts
Fixed percentages
Fixed portions
Reg
assign points if useful

Functional Area derivation as obligatory checkbox in Cost Center distribution cycle?

Dear All,
We are using Cost of Sales accounting with FI-CO online integration. Derivation of Functional Area for Cost Center assessment cycles is an obligatory indicator. Nevertheless I may create Cos Center distribution cycles without this option (what affects FI-CO online integration). Can anybody explain a system logic behind it?
Can I set Functional Area derivation as an obligatory checkbox for Cost Center distribution cycles too?
Bartlomiej Seidel

Hi,
I have searched for any useful note, but without result so far. The point is that any new distribution or assessment cycle (cost centers) in our company must work with Functional Area derivation (than FI-CO online integration works correctly). With our current SAP setup I must select this indicator for every assessment cycle - it is obligatory. But is not obligatory for distribution cycles - and I don't know why?
I would like to protect everybody from crating distribution cycles without FA derivation indicator (like it works now for assessment cycles). How may I do it?
Bart

Assign Functional area to Profit Center Distribution Cycle postings

Hi All,
I am using a NEW GL distribution cycle (Tran Code : FAGLGA35) for distributing balances in the Dummy Profit center to relevent Profit centers.
My Company is using Functional area for FIN STAT Ver and other reportings. When I run the profit center distribution cycle, it distirbutes the amounts but doesnot assign the Functional areas to the posting. Is there a way I can pass the functional area of the relevent postings of the accounts to the postings of each distribution postings.
Thanks
MKR

Dear MKR,
Thank you for using the SAP SDN Forums,
In this particular case, you could have a look at the following to
see if it helps you, but I have not tested this for your case
so it is not being offered as a definite solution:
You could look at using FAGL_ALLO_SUBSTITUTE which might be able to
help you to get the results that you want.
Due to the inheritance logic in allocation, if you set "transfer
field" option active for the field (T811I-INHER), the system copies
the sender value to the receiver if the receive value is not specified.
Please refer to SAP Help portal:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/40/e1510735f30baee10000000a114cbd/frameset.htm
You can deactivate "transfer field" flag in customizing
and use BAdI : FAGL_ALLO_SUBSTITUTE to substitute the intended
functional area. (This BAdI is the "official" way to substitute any
field during allocation, rather than OBBH substitution.)
I hope this may be of some assistance in resolving the issue.
Kind Regards,
Brendan

Tables for amount of document against assessment cycle & distribution cycle

Hi,
Please let me know in which table the transaction value of document(s) are updated in CO module when we run the assessment cycle & distribution cycle ( through T Code - KSV5 OR KSU5).
With regards,
B.Padhy

Hi,
The documents are updated in COEP table.
Regards,
Eli

Distribution Cycle: Cost Centre is a mandatory field for GL Acct

hello,
When I am executing the distribution cycle in FAGLGA35 in update mode I am getting the error (Message no. F5808) "Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account xxxxxx" as detailed below:
Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account 2050 599030
Message no. F5808
Diagnosis
The value for field "Cost Ctr" in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "599030" in company code "2050" linked to the field selection for posting key "40".
System Response
Error
Procedure
It might be an error in the configuration of the G/L account field selection. The initial application, used to call up the interface must otherwise define a value for field "Cost Ctr". If this is the case, contact the consultant responsible for the application used to call up the interface or get in contact with SAP directly.
As per the Field Status Group assigned to the master data of this GL Account, cost centre is an required entry. Further I am not able to change the Field status Group of this GL since this GL acct contains some balance.
Could someone please help me on how to overcome this issue.
Regards,
Lavanya

Hello Ravi,
Thanks for your response.
I have tried the option you have provided but user donot want to use the OKB9 option and neither she wants to change the field status group of the GL Acct by which Cost Centre can made an optional field.
Can you please tell me if we can integrate a cost center in the distribution cycle so that the allocation can be done also for accounts for which a cost center is mandatory ? We can define a cost centre that will be used only for this allocation and that will be the same for all the accounts.
Request your inputs on this.
Regards,
Lavanya

Distribution Cycle KSV5 Resulting in error when deselected the test run chk

Hi Experts,
Please help me out
iam getting an error while running a Distribution Cycle KSV5 Resulting in error when deselected the test run chk box.
When run the same in the test run, there isn't any error log. but when i deselect the same & run iam getting an error like
First Message:
Balance per segment 9999 is not zero
Message no. FAGL_COFI025
Diagnosis
Balance per segment 9999 is not zero.
The balance on segment 9999 is 50.00 (transaction currency), 0.00 (object currency), and 50.00 (controlling area currency).
System Response
With the standard settings, postings cannot be made to the document because the balance for segment and partner segment does not amount to zero. This may be due to a programming error, or this setting may have been made (perhaps unintentionally) in the BAdIs for determining the segment or partner segment.
Procedure
If there is a programming error, please inform your system administrator.
If this behavior is intentional, you can deactivate error message FAGL_COFI 025 in Customizing or change the error message into a warning message or an information message.
2nd Message
Balance per segment 1000 is not zero
Message no. FAGL_COFI025
Diagnosis
Balance per segment 1000 is not zero.
The balance on segment 1000 is 50.00- (transaction currency), 0.00 (object currency), and 50.00- (controlling area currency).
System Response
With the standard settings, postings cannot be made to the document because the balance for segment and partner segment does not amount to zero. This may be due to a programming error, or this setting may have been made (perhaps unintentionally) in the BAdIs for determining the segment or partner segment.
Procedure
If there is a programming error, please inform your system administrator.
If this behavior is intentional, you can deactivate error message FAGL_COFI 025 in Customizing or change the error message into a warning message or an information message.
3rd Message
No update performed due to an error
Message no. GA719
Diagnosis
A serious error occurred during processing.
System Response
Processing is continued as far as possible, but results are not posted.
Procedure
This error is shown in the error list before this error message. Here you can find more information about this particular error.
I would appreciate an early reply........!!!
Thanks & Regards,
Neela

Hi,
Check notes 764652 and 897086; it might be helpful.
Regards,
Eli

Distribution cycle problem

Hi,
I created Distribution cycle dated on 27.06.2010 through KSV1. During execution through KSV5 put period 1 to 3, fiscal year 2010, cycle name and start date ie. creation date of distribution i.e, 27.06.2010, tick on test run and details list. During execution it gives as "Cycle SER is not valid on 1.4.2010". What may be possible reason ?
Regards,
Anindita

Dear Somar,
As per your suggestion i have changed the start date which is between 1 to 3 period. Start date is 27.06.2010 or 30.06.2010. Still it is showing same error as 'Cycle SER is not valid on 01.04.2010'. Even if i change the period from 3 to 3 it shows as ''Cycle SER is not valid on 01.06.2010'.
Regards,
Anindita

Distribution cycles

Dear co experts,
I have 32 sendor cost centers and i have 2 recivers cost centers
In this is two recivers i have allocate the cost 80% to one cost centers and 20% to another cost cenetrs.
In this scenario how to create the distribution cycles.i mean if i create saparate cycles for sendors cost centers or only one cycle is sufficient
Kindly help me on this scenario.
Regards
venkataswamy

Hi,
create only one distribution cycle using TCODE: KSV1 is enough for you requirment.
there first give the cycle name and the date valid from. then in the follwong screen enter the cycle name text . after that clcik on the attached segment button. give the segment name ,text.
in sender heeder tab:
sender rule :posted amount
share:100%
radio button =actual.
receiver rule= fixed percentages
var.portion type : actual cost.
in sender/receiver tab :
sender:
cost center : here give the cost center group ( first create teh 32 sender cost centers as one group using tcode: KSH1)
cost elemnet : give cost element group or the cost element range.
receiver:
cost center: group the 2 receiver cost centers ( or if they are in range give teh range).
receiver tracing TAB:
give the percentage : 80 and 20 for the respective cost centers.
hope its helpful.
thanks.

Distribution Cycle-KSV5

Hi All,
Block cost centers are using for distribution cycle. When running month end cycle will there be a impact. Plz advice.
Thanks,
Ama

Hi ,
If block cost centers donot have any balance.. there will not be any impact on the cycle..
Before blocking , please ensure that the balance of the Cost Center is zero... or else please block after the distribution cycle is executed and the balance is zero.
Regards
Sarada

Message GA603 when I'm create a Actual Distribution Cycle

Hi,
I'm trying to create a actual distribution cycle (transaction KSV1) and when I choose "Receiver Tracing Factor" to plan percent, I receive the error message GA603.
I need to do distribution from cost center to internal order group. Firstly, I created a order group.
Could anybody help me?
Thanks,
Osmar Tardivo.

I think it has something to do with the Internal Order group selection in the Receiver values.
Have you created the Group using GS01>Creating Set>with table CCSS and field AUFNR and then assign the values of internal order which you would want to group it.
Then assign the internal order group created in receiver and try to click on the Receiving Tracing Factor...
I hope this helps.

No. of settlement rules in distribution cycle

Hello,
Can sombody please tell me how many settlement rules can be used while creating a GL distribution cycle in transaction FAGLFA31.Is there any restriction on the number of settlement rules.
Thanks,
Lavanya

Hi, you mean segment?If so seems 9999

Distribution Cycle

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for