DLU policy not allowing user to unlock

ZCM 11.2.2
SLES11SP2
eDir 8.7
Win7 x86 and x64 workstations
I am currently deploying a test environment to about 6 Win7 machines - a mix of x86 ans x64 machines.
On several of the x86 machines if it locks due to inactivity the currently logged on user is not being allowed to unlock the workstation. Error received is "This computer is locked. Only the logged on user can unlock". It is not across the board but just a few. We are getting the Novell login box but it will not unlock even though it is the same user that originally logged on prior to locking.
If the policy is removed from that machine it seems to function fine.
I have set the NIC power management to not allow the computer to turn the NIC off to save power and the result is the same.
Any guidance would be appreciated.

I don't have the foggiest on how DLU could relate to this issue.
I've never head that before.
I would recommend also asking in the Client Forums.
You may want to try disabling all Power Mgmt Features.
Have you tried changing it over to the local Windows User to try and
unlock the account? ( I presume you can do this in Win7, that used to
work for XP when this happened.)
On 3/7/2013 4:36 PM, usfsoyer wrote:
>
> ZCM 11.2.2
> SLES11SP2
> eDir 8.7
> Win7 x86 and x64 workstations
>
> I am currently deploying a test environment to about 6 Win7 machines -
> a mix of x86 ans x64 machines.
>
> On several of the x86 machines if it locks due to inactivity the
> currently logged on user is not being allowed to unlock the workstation.
> Error received is "This computer is locked. Only the logged on user can
> unlock". It is not across the board but just a few. We are getting the
> Novell login box but it will not unlock even though it is the same user
> that originally logged on prior to locking.
>
> If the policy is removed from that machine it seems to function fine.
>
> I have set the NIC power management to not allow the computer to turn
> the NIC off to save power and the result is the same.
>
> Any guidance would be appreciated.
>
>
Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
Novell Knowledge Partner
Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.

Similar Messages

During the io 5 update process, my iphone 3gs froze and now will shut off and turn on by itself, and will not allow me to unlock the phone or do anything with it. how do i fix this?

during the io 5 update process, my iphone 3gs froze and now will shut off and turn on by itself, and will not allow me to unlock the phone or do anything with it. how do i fix this?

Follow the instructions here > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1808
You may need to try a few times to get it to work

If there is no accounting document; SAP should not allow users to print

Dear Gurus,
Is there a standard way that,
--if there is no accounting document; SAP should not allow users to print invoice?
How can I do it?
Regards,

You can either use Tcode NACE for output procedure pr follow following path in SPRO:
IMG - SD - Basic Functions - Output control - Output Determination - Maintain Output Determination for Billing Documents - Maintain Output Determination Procedure
There for your output procedure used for the desired output type maintain requirement routine as 62 : Billing doc released to acctng.
This requirement is met if the billing document is complete checking the header, pricing, and all items and has already been passed to financial accounting. The requirement also checks that the document is not relevant for an invoice list. This requirement can be assigned to billing document output condition types that should only be processed when the billing document is complete and forwarded to accounting. This requirement can only be used with billing documents.
Regards
JP

Do not allow user to enter non-number data.

Hello
For some reason the have used the TEXT FIELD object for numeric data input field.
Actually, user has to always enter numeric data ONLY.
No decimals, no commas, no alphabetical characters allowed except numbers.
(Syststem should not allow user enter non-allowed data at all....i mean to say, when we achive by using Numeric field/object.... or If user trying to enter any non-allowed data i hv to throw an error and CLEAR the field immediately)
Pls. let me know How to get my requirement? Do i need to use JavaScript or Pattern or Validation Pattern in object pallette or ALL 3?
I am newbie, pls. provide me the code (if JavaScript)
Thank you

http://forums.adobe.com/message/4265578#4265578

DLU policy not applying - Console One won't OK

I've created a DLU policy that has administrator group rights. When I try
to associate it to a user I click OK and the the screen stays (doesn't
close). The button isn't greyed out and an hour glass appears but it does
nothing. I've tried the reverse - associating the policy from the user -
with the same results. Tried deleting and recreating both the user and
policy in different containers.
Dsrepair shows everything is clean and the tree is synced.
Single server tree, netware 5.2 sp7, zen 3.2, console one 3.5
I have other trees exactly the same and do not have this issue....

Don't really want to apply anymore patches. We did on one install and it
messed up all our configurations. This is at a school and with the
students now back I can't afford any down time.
> Hi
> Could you try with Zen SP3 on the current 1.3.6c Consoleone if you see
> the same problem ?
>
> --
> Regards, Kai Reichert
> Novell Support Forum Sysop
>
> People who claim that computers will make life easier for us have
> obviously never used one.

ZCM DLU Policy Not Applying To Win7 Computer

I am running ZCM v10.3 and am preparing to migrate over to Active Directory. When I first setup ZCM, I created a DLU policy for my Windows 7 computers and its been working fine. However, its time to join my Windows 7 computers (running ZCM v10.3) to the AD Domain and I need to disable the DLU for the machines prior to joining the domain.
To do this I tried to exclude my test workstations from the DLU by adding the workstations to the exclusion list for the DLU Policy. My DLU policy is assigned to my Users so I used the "Excluded Workstation List" to attempt to prevent the DLU from applying to the workstation. This didn't work. I also tried the reverse by applying the DLU to the test workstation and adding users to the Exclusion list, but that didn't work either. I updated the version, ran "zac cc" and ran "zac ref bypasscache" but it didnt work.
I reassigned the DLU to all my Users and tried to use the registry to check for the existence and value of hklm\software\novell\zcm\zenlgn\domainlogin=1, but that didnt work either. I updated the version, ran "zac cc" and ran "zac ref bypasscache" but it didnt work.
Actually, the registry keys (DomainLogin and eDIRLogin) didn't exist so i had to manually add it using an AD GPO. I added DomainLogin and eDIRLogin and assign hexadecimal value of 1 to each DWORD via GPO (FYI). At this point I'm not even sure if the values of these keys are supposed to be set automatically upon login or if the admins manually control the values. Its not clear to me from the documentation on the Novell site. (http://www.novell.com/documentation/...stem_admin.pdf, pg 274)
(DLU Policy Filters not working)
I turned on debug by issuing the command: "zac log level debug", and would've attached the log here, but I don't know how. If anyone needs to see the log, please send me a link on how to attach a log and I'll do so.
I've tried so many different settings and combinations but i'm still unable to get consistent results. At some point I was able to get the DLU Policy to show up in the ZCM Agent properties with the status of "Not Applied" or "Not Effective" or something to that effect. That was the first time I was able to log in without the DLU applying. However it wasn't consistent among other machines so i kept testing. As it stands now, I have removed any filters and exclusions and now my test machine is not receiving any DLU policy and it should because I assigned the DLU Policy to my entire user base. I am totally lost.
Any help is appreciated.

wanman,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://forums.novell.com/

Password policy not allowing to reconfigure STMS

Hi Guru's,
I have done system copy by database restore method, in post activities I have mistakenly deleted STMS configuration on domain controller, now when I am trying to add production server in landscape.
the password policy is not allowing us to reconfigure STMS.
I have manually reset the TMSADM password with alphanumeric format on all three system in client 000 with user DDIC,but I was getting same error message,
After removing password policy on PRD server it allowed me to configure STMS for PRD server.
Is there other way to reconfigure STMS without removing policy?
policy parameter:
login/min_password_specials ==>1
login/min_password_digits ==>1
since i dont want to remove password policy to reconfigure STMS,
please suggest, alternative.
-Gokul Chitode

you may want to have a look at SAP Note 761637 - Login restrictions prevent TMSADM logon

DLU policy not applying

Customer site has been using ZEN for years. User package with DLU has always been associated at the OU levels and has been working for the users just fine.
Now we're into a new project that requires the user packages to be associated to the individual users, and a non-DLU package associated to the OUs. What we're seeing is roughly 25% of the users are getting the non-DLU policy, even though their associated and effective policy is supposed to be the DLU one.
Has anyone seen this? Can you tell me why it's happening?
Thanks in advance,
A.

zeffan,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/

Not allowing users to change qty in PM order after release

Hi
I am using the user exit IW010009(customer check for save event - ZXWOCU07 to control the permit functionality against the plan cost in the PM order, which is functioning well. But I have a requirement to check , the below scenario.
In IW31, the user creates the order with component “A” and qty 10 having value more than the permit value (say Rs.5000/,) and if he tries to release the order, the system does not allow the user to release the order. The user goes and changes the qty of the component “A” to 3 and the value is less than Rs 5000. The user successfully releases the order, but doesn’t save. He then goes to the component tab and changes the qty to 10 and save the order.
I need some help to control the user action, of changing the qty, after release. Is there any table/function where I can find the order no and the qty entered after release of the PM order and before saving.
I have done some coding for WBS entry (customization) and the permit in the user exit IW010009.
Regards
Vidhyadharan

Hi Jogeswara Rao
I have pasted below the requirement from my original thread
"I need some help to control the user action, of changing the qty, after release. Is there any table/function where I can find the order no and the qty entered after release of the PM order and before saving."
Regards
Vidhyadharan

Not allow users to disable startup script

I have written a User Login script for indesign and have successfully implemented in Indesign CS3. However, anyone can disable the login script that I have put in the Startup script by modifying the Preference setting of the Indesign. I would be very grateful if any one there could suggest me on how to not allow the users to disable the login script put inside the Startup Script folder.
Thanks,
Limbu, Keshar

Thank you very much for you response. But, it is not about the user right permission. There is a selection options in the Perference setting of Indesign. If you untick that option, Indesign will run bypassing the scripts in the startup scripts folder. Is there any way to not allow the users to not select this option so that the startup scripts does not get bypassed?
In the above preference setting the last check box is not selected hence Indesign will bypass all startup scripts. Only if this last option is selected the startup scritps will run.
Thanks
Limbu Keshar

Not allow user to change Vendor in MB1B(541 mov) in subcontracting process

Hi all
Im doing 541 mov type in mb1b wrt PO number, the vendor number is automatically fetching from PO but user can change the vendor there,
I have to set display field as vendor,not allow to change vendor in MB1B..how can i set??? plz help me
thanks
ramesh reddy

Hi,
I would like to remeber you there is no direct connection between the purchase order and the
subcontractor stock. When you enter the purchase order in the MB1B
transaction, the data defaults from the purchase order only as an aid to
entry.
Please review the following notes for further explanations:
70739 - No order-related stock of material provided in R/3
50540 - Quantity proposal for movement type 541 for the
The transaction is designed to be a way to simplify the input of the
data. It allows you to change the data and overship or undership if you
would like. As there is no vendor stock specifically related to a
purchase order, there is no quantity check, and if you want, you can
post it several times or change the quantity.
In standard procedure we normally use ME2O instead of MB1B
BR
Nadia Orlandi

Network account - Having "user must change password at nex logon checked" - does not allow user to login

Hi,
We have several SharePoint 2013 sites which, when the option called "User must change password at next logon" is checked on a user's Active Directory account, the user is not allowed to login to the SharePoint site. Is this something that needs
to be changed on the SharePoint end to resolve?
thanks,
Sherazad.
Sherazad

You need to look at a different solution that allows this, e.g. home-grown solution, 3rd party, and I believe Forefront Identity Manager can also accomplish this task. There are quite a few self-service password management solutions out there. Search on
that term, and you should be able to find something that works for you.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Do not allow User to Booked Sales Order if Line QTY is not enough.

Hi All,
Is there a way in Order Management setup to not allow sales people to Booked their Sales Order if there are order lines where the qty is not enough in the Inventory, where it will cause 'Backorder' if picked and shipped?
Regards,
Ja

Jay
Is there a business reason to stop booking? The order is already entered and if you want to stop booking, at that time, will they go back and book the orders later?
It hampers your business knowing the demand for your product. Back ordering is a good thing and not necessarily evil.
If you still want to do this you have to use inv_quantity_tree_pub.query_quantities to get the quantities. As Sandeep said, it is better you do this in Order header workflow by calling this and based on the result you can decide what you want.
Thanks

Software Restriction Policy not allowing Program Files directory on 64-bit machines

I've created a new software restriction policy, my default security level is set to "Disallowed", I have the standard built-in allowed locations:
%HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\SystemRoot%
%HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ProgramFilesDir%
and I added another exemption for the C:\Program Files (x86) directory:
%HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ProgramFilesDir (x86)%
However, on my 64-bit machines, there are still programs being blocked in C:\Program Files:
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office 15\ClientX64\OfficeC2RClient.exe
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office 15\Root\Office15\MsoSync.exe
These same programs are not being blocked on my 32-bit machines, but the same policy is being applied to both and the programs are installed in the same locations on both.
I checked the registry on one of the 64-bit machines, and the default registry key exemption specified above:
%HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\ProgramFilesDir%
does exist on the 64-bit machine and it is set to C:\Program Files, exactly like the 32-bit machines. So why are programs still being blocked here?
Shaun

Hi Shaun,
>>on my 64-bit machines, there are still programs being blocked in C:\Program Files:
Before going further, are all the applications under the path not able to run or just some ones? Besides, when we run the applications mentioned above, did it tip that it's blocked by group policy? Here, we can run command
gpresult/h gpreport.html with administrative privileges to collect group policy result report to check if this is caused by some other GPOs.
Best regards,
Frank Shen
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Firefox 4 on Windows 7/XP is not allowing user interaction with form elements that contain HTML coding. For instance, a textarea element whose content includes h4 My Content /h4 br /

On a Mac, Firefox 4 was also dysfunctional and the "enter" key immediately submitted the form instead of adding a line if the cursor was placed inside content to start with, but on Windows it seems impossible to get the cursor inside the textarea content at all.
The "view source" of the form textarea element plus the content that our user entered is pasted below:
<textarea name="content" cols="120" rows="50"><h4>SEARCH TOOL NOT WORKING</h4><br>
<h3>TRY FIRST</h3>
<P>Check for popup blockers; set for allow<br>
Mac users may want to use Firefox if Safari does not work and not a popup problem.</P>
<h3>COMMUNICATION FOR TROUBLESHOOTING </h3>
<p>Must provide the following information:<br>
Computer's operating system?<br>
Browser and version?<br>
On campus or off, if off how are you getting a Brown IP address?<br>
What in detail is wrong?<br>
What have you tried to overcome the problem?
</p>
<h3>IF ALL ELSE FAILS</h3>
<p>Contact CIS HELP - it may be your computer.
<p>A computer cluster in one of the libraries or CIT if the problem is not with the vendor. </p></textarea>

p.s. I realize that the user content is somewhat confusing, and your web page interprets the HTML tags instead of displaying them explicitly...
The user content begins after the <textarea> element and includes HTML headers, breaks, etc. Other HTML content inside form elements gave similar results. Thanks!

DLU policy not allowing user to unlock

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for