DMEE issue

Hello Experts,
I am working on the withholding tax DMEE. DMEE is Z one. My requirement is to have separate line for header which i can do. but for line item, requirement to have all all line item in one line with $ as separator.
Please let me know how to achive second requiment of line item.
Header level is 1
Line item level is 2 in DMEE.
Regards,
Sagar

Define a constant(TYPE CHAR1) '$' between the different fields of the line item. This would do the trick.

Similar Messages

  • DMEE issue in header and detail record

    Hi Gurs,
    I am working in DMME payment medium .
    I have declared DMEE  header structure(00000001000001 ) as level 1 and detail (050000010020192             XX110000001) as also level 1.
    This is the output format i am getting.
    00000001000001                                                                               
    05000001002000             XX110000001                                                                               
    00000001000001                                                                               
    05000001002012            XX110000002                                                                               
    00000001000001                                                                               
    05000001002012             XX110000003                                                                00000001000001                                                                               
    05000001002011             XX110000004           
    But my requirment not lke this. i need to dispaly all detail items under one header also i need to increase the counter for every items starting from 2.
    Both header and detail are at  level 1.If i declared the detail as level 2 the output is not generated.
    This is what i need.                                                                               
    00000001000001                                                                               
    05000002002000             XXX110000001                                                        
    05000003002012             XXX110000002
    05000004002012             XXX110000003
    05000005002011             XXX110000004 
    Pls suggest me any solutions
    Thanks .

    NOT answered

  • DMEE Issues header and detail record

    Hi Gurs,
    I am working in DMME(PAYM) payment medium .
    I have declared DMEE header structure(00000001000001 ) as level 1 and detail (050000010020192 XX110000001) as also level 1.
    This is the output format i am getting.
    00000001000001
    05000001002000 XX110000001
    00000001000001
    05000001002012 XX110000002
    00000001000001
    05000001002012 XX110000003 00000001000001
    05000001002011 XX110000004
    But my requirment not lke this. i need to dispaly all detail items under one header also i need to increase the counter for every items starting from 2.
    Both header and detail are at level 1.If i declared the detail as level 2 the output is not generated.
    This is what i need.
    00000001000001
    05000002002000 XXX110000001
    05000003002012 XXX110000002
    05000004002012 XXX110000003
    05000005002011 XXX110000004
    Pls suggest me any solutions
    Thanks .
    Edited by: bala chandran on Oct 9, 2009 10:57 AM

    NOT answered

  • DME Payment Formats

    Hi, I am working on a DME issue. Here the Funct Consultant has created a new payment format in which it ll pick the IBAN number in place of Bank A/C number of vendor for Automatic Payment transaction (F110) of Open Orders. The requirement is while doing  the payments if the IBAN is blank then it should pick the bank ac number for that vendor.i might need to add a Function Module for this one but I ve debugged the program but not getting from where its getting the value for IBAN. Could you please give me some suggestion in order to solve this.
    Thanks.

    Hello Sam
    When configuring the payment methods for the country (transaction OBVCU), choose the payment medium program as RFFOM100. 
    From se38, pls read the documentation for the program, which will give you the various options & the required config too. 
    You would also need to configure the instructions keys as required. 
    To generate the DME file, you have to run the automatic payment program with this payment method. 
    After the payments have been successfully posted, you can go to DME administration and with the help of dme manager download files on your PC. 
    SAP has determined that the standard print programs for automatic payments will no longer be supported, and will be replaced by transfer structures created by a tool called the DME Engine. 
    This tool enables the business to create DME output files without ABAP development, and can be attached to a print program and form for the creation of Payment Advices. 
    Outside of the DME Engine (DMEE), the majority of the configuration takes place within the following IMG menu path: 
    IMG Path: Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Business Transactions -> Outgoing Payments -> Automatic Outgoing Payments -> Payment Media -> Make Settings for Payment Media Formats from Payment Medium Workbench 
    Config 
    Assign Selection Variants 
    IMG -> Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Business Transactions -> Outgoing Payments -> Automatic Outgoing Payments -> Payment Media -> Make Settings for Payment Medium Formats from Payment Medium Workbench -> Create / Assign Selection Variants or transaction 
    OBPM4..select your format that you are using 
    Check in FBZP config that all is linked! 
    Although this is bitty but you need to work through it! 
    Start with FBZP, create all there than go to DMEE either to create your own format or use the standard ones.. than go to the menu path above and work through from create to assign...

  • Issue in Turkey DME payment file

    Hello Gurus,
    We have an issue in F110 payment file. We have configured DMEE for "GARANTI BANK" for Turkey country.  we have encountered an issue while creating payment file in F110.  System is not considering into the payment file if a vendor is having multiple bank accounts in the vendor master and invoices are posted with different partner bank type. We are not facing any issue for mutiple invoices paid for same vendor with same vendor bank account.  The below example will give clear picture.
    1) Vendor-1075847 having two different bank accounts in vendor master with partner bank type-0001 & 0002
    2) Total three invoices are due for payment out of these, two invoices are posted with bank type-0002 and remaining invoice is with bank type-0001
    3) When I run F110 for all three invoices, invoices gets cleared but in payment file to be sent to bank showing only one invoice amount which was posted with bank type-0001.
    4) I believe that I need to do some changes in DMEE tree configuration to get all invoices information in the payment file but no idea that in which segment & tag to be done.
    It woudl be great if any one shares their ideas/experiences in this regard.
    Thanks in advance

    Hello Friends,
    We have come to the conculsion that whenever line items are splitting in F110 as shown in the attached screen shot, system not picking up the entire amount into the payment file which was cleared in the payment run. This issue is encountering only when payments are dividing into line items for that particular vendor.
    For above example: first line item having two invoices to be cleared consiting of amounts 258,00 & 129,00(partner bank type-0001) and second line item having only one invoice(amount-119,00) related to same vendor(with partner bank type-0002). Because of this split at F110 level..., payment file which is sending to bank getting only first line item invoices amount-387,00(258,00+129,00) instead of whole amount-506,00.
    This issue might be resolved by combining these two line items into one line item or by making changes in the payment medium workbench format(DMEE tree). I have considered & tried all possible field in FBZP & vendor master and unluckly nothing workedout.
    Please share you inputs. It deliberately need at this point of time.
    Thanks in advance

  • F110 Issue:there is diff between of 1000usd in F110 payment list & dme file

    H i experts
    F110 Issue: there is difference between of 1000 usd in F110 payment list and Dme file.
    please let me know reason
    regards
    sachin

    Check the amount field in the DME as to which value it is picking.  I think it is mapped incorrectly.
    Ravi.

  • F110 issue with multiple users - unable to create DME output

    Hi
    I have an issue, when i have multiple users executing F110 using the payment programs for DME output. program SAPPAYM that when a user tries to create DME output, that nothing is created.
    it is as if the first person who creates a payment proposal then blocks the subsequent users from creating output.
    we have found that the only way around this issue is to get one user executing a payment run at a time.
    Only by getting all the other suers off the system and deleting any payment proposals can we produce the output.
    any ideas??
    Liz

    Hi
    I have an issue, when i have multiple users executing F110 using the payment programs for DME output. program SAPPAYM that when a user tries to create DME output, that nothing is created.
    it is as if the first person who creates a payment proposal then blocks the subsequent users from creating output.
    we have found that the only way around this issue is to get one user executing a payment run at a time.
    Only by getting all the other suers off the system and deleting any payment proposals can we produce the output.
    any ideas??
    Liz

  • Issue with DMEE file header

    hi experts,
    i would to seek your advice on below issue.
    i have created a DMEE file for customer direct debit, however the file still not correct and not accepted from the bank format.
    expected file is like this:
    H,,,
    D,WINDOWS DELIGHT,50820031230,210003,2052.24,KONE ELVTRS,50655,XYZ,
    D,WINDOWS DELIGHT,50820031230,210003,2052.24,KONE ELVTRS,50655,XYZ,
    D,WOODSIDE VILLAGE M/M,50170105842,210001,5297.63,KONE ELVTRS,51001,XYZ,
    D,WOODSIDE VILLAGE M/M,50170105842,210001,5297.63,KONE ELVTRS,51001,XYZ,
    D,WERLEX PROPERTIES,62008355001,210003,1536.33,KONE ELVTRS,50655,XYZ,
    D,WERLEX PROPERTIES,62008355001,210003,1536.33,KONE ELVTRS,50655,XYZ,
    but i could get from my DMEE setting is like this:
    H,,,
    D,WINDOWS DELIGHT,50820031230,210003,2052.24,KONE ELVTRS,50655,XYZ,
    D,WINDOWS DELIGHT,50820031230,210003,2052.24,KONE ELVTRS,50655,XYZ,
    H,,
    D,WOODSIDE VILLAGE M/M,50170105842,210001,5297.63,KONE ELVTRS,51001,XYZ,
    D,WOODSIDE VILLAGE M/M,50170105842,210001,5297.63,KONE ELVTRS,51001,XYZ,
    H,,
    D,WERLEX PROPERTIES,62008355001,210003,1536.33,KONE ELVTRS,50655,XYZ,
    D,WERLEX PROPERTIES,62008355001,210003,1536.33,KONE ELVTRS,50655,XYZ,
    i dont know what should i do to remove the 2nd and 3rd 'H' from the file.
    kindly advice.
    thanks
    eelin

    Hi,
    Kindly check at DMEE Properties under "Level" Tab:
        Repetition Factor for Level for Node of ( H,,,) change to 99.  Just try and error basis it going to solve your problem.
    Regards,
    Venkat

  • DME- Allignment issue for UK

    Hello Expert,
    I need assistance with respect to DME file creation for UK client.
    My issue is with alignment, I have created the file as per the layout provided by the client but the problem is below.
    Client want the file in the below format,
    VOL1
    HDR1                                     12270000000
    Where as i'm able to generate the file as below.
    VOL1
    HDR10000000000000000000000000000000000000112270000000
    How to remove the zero's and provide the same space in between then because date should start from 42 to 47 fields.
    Where as in configuration, i have  the mapped the structure as constant and sources 0's.
    Please let me know if you need any more details with respect to my query.
    Appreciate yore help.
    Regards
    J. varghese

    Quote
    The only solution at the moment is to feed a separate sound feed into the Line-in of the sound card
    i believe that is the better solution. as long as your recording program (MSIPVS) has the Line-In set as recording source, you shouldn't have any problems

  • UNA Segment Issue in DMEE Tree

    Hi ,  I am creating custom DMEE trees in tcode DMEE . The issue that i have is with the segment UNA.
    The output format they want is UNA:+.? '
    but i dont know how to get this in the output file ,  i mean i am not sure how to create the element for this UNA segment to reflect the value :+.? '      ? If you could help me in creating this segment that would be great!
    Thanks.

    Any help in this would be greatly appreciated!! ..Its very critical ...

  • DMEE tree issue

    Hi ,
    I am facing a issue while  my dmee tree file generation. In generated file , last filed i.e. REGHU-VBLNR (FPAYH-DOC1R offset 4 )
    all of its characters are not coming in file .Only initial 1 character is appearing in the file generated.
    while in debug i am able to see all characters in field DOC1R.
    IN DMEE tree there are total 11 data elements and out of them this one is last .
    Please provide some help on this .
    Thanks
    saurabh
    Edited by: saurabh Asthana on Jul 16, 2010 4:34 PM

    Any help in this would be greatly appreciated!! ..Its very critical ...

  • DME thailand issue with aggregation

    Hi,
    Can any one help me in the below issue?
    Relating to DMEE for thailand
    Invoice amount in payment record 2 different requiremnt one is when it is local currency it should populate gross  amount in Dme,
    where as when it foreign currency it should populate the net amount in DME.
    To resolve this we have created one element under which 2 nodes for local curency and foregn currency.
    Now the problem is with total record. it actually aggregated the amount based on the REFERENCE ID given in the element .. since here 2 atoms are there for foregn and local if i am taking 2 reference ID's and calling both giving different reference ID .. it is giving error ..
    can any suggest how to get each total in when it is local currency and when it foregn currency ..
    is there any setting with aggregation
    thank you for your help..

    I guess E123456 Member calculation overrides the consolidation value of its children. (E123 +, E456 +...)

  • 1099 MISC output to Application Server Issue 2010 DME file

    Dear all,
    I have an issue where I cannot output my clients IRS file to our application server. Using program RFIDYYWT we enter the parameters. The output group is supposed to place the file on the application server, and create using the 2010 DME file.
    However, this is not happening.
    The strange thing is, I can use the 2009 DME file and create data for 2010. However, this will create it in the 2009 format which is not valid this year.
    The most interesting piece is that all of my output groups point to the application server, however I do not specify the file to go there during the program (RFIDYYWT) parameters. I just give my desktop. Still, the file will create on the application server using the 2009 DME.
    Again, this does not happen with the 2010 DME. Where is the program pulling the file path from?
    If I do specify the file path to the app server during the program parameters, it just creates it in binary. This is true for both the 2009 DME and the 2010 DME. Therefore, I am sure it is pulling a file path from somewhere else.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks,

    Thanks Shannon, that was very helpful. We're going to go down the route of the OSS note which should address the issue.
    We still don't know why the system, in its as is state, acts the way it does. But with the FAQ attached to one of the notes I at least see how to fix it and go about it another way.
    Thanks again,
    David L.

  • DME file issue: Payment run for Customers

    Hi Gurus,
    Please help me in the following problem.
    I have done the configurations for automatic collection/refund using F110 for customers in our ECC 6 system. Iu2019m having a requirement as below.
    1. Singular payments to be made for each customer transaction.  Have done that by checking u2018Singular paymentsu2019 check box in customer master data.
    2. All payments should be collected in DME file at customer level even though the payments are multiple.   have done that by customizing the RFFOGB_T program.
    3. Configurations are done for incoming (Receivables) and outgoing payments (refunds) in SAP and working fine.
    Now the problem is, there is a requirement to net-off the monetary value of a customer in DME file i.e. if a customer having debits and credits then we need to net off the amounts and check whether itu2019s an incoming or outgoing payment to that customer. I have done the code changes for this requirement as well and it is working perfectly fine, however DME file produces 2 CONTRA lines one as debit to bank account and another as Credit to bank account (provided I have 2 customers in a run where one customer ends up in net debit balance, and another customer ends up with net credit balance). Our Bank doesn't accept more than one CONTRA in a single DME file.
    Example scenario:
    Customer1
    Booking 1  -> 400 (Dr) & 200 (Cr)
    Booking 2  -> 300 (Dr) & 100 (Cr)
    Customer2
    Booking 3 -> 100 (Dr) & 300 (Cr)
    Currently If I run the payment run by having both incoming and outgoing payment methods, then my DME file will result as below
    Customer 1 -> Dr 400
    Customer 2 -> Cr 200
    Bank account -> Cr 200
    However our bank is not accepting the above DME since there are debits as well as credit data records in the same file.
    Currently we are going with 2 separate payment runs, one for incoming and another for outgoing by this I could able to produce 2 DME files as below for the above customer bookings.
    Payment run 1:
    DME 1:
    Customer 1 -> Dr 700
    Customer 2 -> Dr 100
    Bank account -> Cr 800
    Payment run 2:
    DME 2:
    Customer 1 -> Cr 300
    Customer 2 -> Cr 300
    Bank account -> Dr 600
    Both files are being accepted by Bank, however business is not agreeing this since for every customer transaction bank charges client. (There will be 2 transaction for same customer in the same day)
    Anybody encountered the same problem? I need some suggestion on how to produce 2 DME files in a single payment run, one having only net debit balance customers and another having only net credit balance customers, so that on a particular payment run a customer will have only one transaction going into bank either Credit or Debit. Basically I need to produce DME files as below for the above customer bookings
    Payment Run 1:
    DME 1:
    Customer 1 -> Dr 400
    Bank account -> Cr 400
    DME 2:
    Customer 2 -> Cr 200
    Bank account -> Dr 200
    Please help.

    Client has a difft scenario.
    They pay to the customers for warranty and incentives. 2 ways to pay to the customer: generating payment run F110 within AR and the other being F110 from AP where all the customer open items are closed and sent to AP for payment using a custom program.
    The problem with this is they have two interfaces each from AP and AR and aslo a custom program.
    Now, solution is to pay all customers thru AP by setting each customer as vendor so that all the open items are picked in the payment run.
    Next solution is to have single interface but paymentruns seperately from AR and AP. Both would send the files differently to Bank when paymnt run executed. Concern here is when both Ar and AP send files will the interface be able to handle it like 2 difft files or should there be any consolidation kind of thing.
    Another question is, do we have to set up all customers as vendors in order to pay to the customer thru AP. There is customer accounts field where range of customer accounts can be added. Just by adding customer accounts, does it pick up the items for payment.
    Please reply.
    Satya

  • DME File issue

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    I am working on one DME file format 'iFile' for China.  We do have one requirement that Bank name and Beneficiary name field should not exceed 11 characters and if the name is exceeding 11 characters than it should appear in different field.  For e.g. if the bank name is 'Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited' than it should need to be mapped as given below:
    Field 1              Hongkong an
    Fileld 2             d Shanghai
    Field 3              banking Cor
    Field 4              poration Li
    Field 5              mited
    Will it be possible to map the field in DME engine as metioned above.  If not, what will be the alternative solution for this problem.
    Many thanks for your support.
    Regards,
    SATVIR SINGH

    Hi,
    You can achieve this in the following manner:
    1. Create 5 Atoms under the Element Beneficiary Bank Name and give Own Mapping in the attributes tab.
    2. Give the names of each of the Atom as BBN1, BBN2, BBN3, BBN4 & BBN5 and give exit module in the attributes tab.
    3. Take the help of your ABAP colleague and create a user exit with the logic as: Take the full name of the Bank name in a temporary field. Use the WRAP function in the ABAP coding and, fill the 1st field up to 11 characters till it finds a space.  Fill the next by removing the prefix space and upto the suffix space and so on. But, the problem here is if we take your example, the name is u201CHongkong and Shanghai  Banking Corporation Limitedu201D. This will come as BBN1: u201CHongkongu201D, BBN2: u201Candu201D, BBN3: u201CShanghaiu201D, BBN4: u201CBankingu201D, BBN5: u201CCorporationu201D. Here u201CLimitedu201D cannot be accommodated. Instead, if the name of the bank is changed to u201CHongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limitedu201D then, BBN1 will have u201CHongkong &u201D and the rest of the name in other fields.
    4. The reason for giving standard names to the Atoms in point.2 (which represent the 5 fields) is to enable these names to be used in the coding as given in point.3.
    The above solution will work only if small adjustments are done in the master data for names which are intervening between two fields.
    Hope it is clear and useful.
    Regards,
    Kiron Kumar T.

Maybe you are looking for