DMS_RELOCATE_CONTENT take more documents you whant!

Hi at all,
i just whant to inform you about an "Error" i get last week.
I moved DMS Documents from Categorie X to Y with the standard Report DMS_RELOCATE_CONTENT.
I just select the source Category (s_scat) and the
If the X repository is not assigned to docuspace "DMS" the report will select ALL Repositorys / Documents!!!!
(i changed the docuspace before, because i don't whant that users save new documents in this)
Line 165:
* Check for storage-categories
   IF NOT s_scat IS INITIAL.
     SELECT * FROM sdokstcdsp INTO TABLE lt_scat
     WHERE docuspace = 'DMS' AND
           stor_cat IN s_scat.
   ENDIF.
Result lt_scat is inital an the report select all documents...
Now i need to move selected documents back in there original repository :-(...

Similar Messages

'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document

Hi Experts,
I m using 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' in my custom report, it takes more time for creating Material documents.
Please let me know if there is any option to overcome this issue.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Leo

Hi,
please check if some of following OSS notes are not valid for your problem:
[Note 838036 - AFS: Performance issues during GR with ref. to PO|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/838036]
[Note 391142 - Performance: Goods receipt for inbound delivery|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/391142]
[Note 1414418 - Goods receipt for customer returns: Various corrections|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1414418]
The other idea is not to commit each call, but executing commit of packages e.g. after 1000 BAPI calls.
But otherwise, I am afraid you can not do a lot about performance of standard BAPI. Maybe there is some customer enhancement which is taking too long inside the BAPI, but this has to be analysed by you. To analyse performance, just execute your program via tr. SE30.
Regards
Adrian

'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document for the 1st time

Hi Experts,
I am doing goods movement using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE in my custom code.
Then there is some functional configuration such that, material documents and TR and TO are getting created.
Now I need to get TO and TR numbers from LTAK table passing material documnt number and year, which I got from above used BAPI.
The problem I am facing is very strange.
Only for the 1st time, I am not finding TR and TO values in LTAK table. And subsequent runs I get entries in LTAK in there is a wait time of 5 seconds after bapi call.
I have found 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' takes more time for creating material document with similar issue, but no solution or explanation.
Note 838036 says something similar, but it seems obsolete.
Kindly share your expertise and opinions.
Thanks,
Anil

Hi,
please check if some of following OSS notes are not valid for your problem:
[Note 838036 - AFS: Performance issues during GR with ref. to PO|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/838036]
[Note 391142 - Performance: Goods receipt for inbound delivery|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/391142]
[Note 1414418 - Goods receipt for customer returns: Various corrections|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1414418]
The other idea is not to commit each call, but executing commit of packages e.g. after 1000 BAPI calls.
But otherwise, I am afraid you can not do a lot about performance of standard BAPI. Maybe there is some customer enhancement which is taking too long inside the BAPI, but this has to be analysed by you. To analyse performance, just execute your program via tr. SE30.
Regards
Adrian

Save an empty document in InDesign CC and Illustrator CC takes more than 3 min.

Save an empty document in InDesign CC and Illustrator CC takes more than 3 min.
The same if you open an empty document.
I monitored the application status using Activity Monitor and every time I saved a document the application didn't respond then, after about three minutes, comes back to life.
I'm working on a MacBook Pro, 2.6 Ghz, 8 Gb Ram with OS X 10.9.
Please let me know If someone else had the same issue because I use Adobe softwares not only for my personal job but also to show people how Adobe software works...
Thanks.
Andrea Spinazzola

Adobe Drive is the reason!
Please communicate this to everybody massively because I think is the reason why many Adobe CC users refer about bad performance.
I heard many issues related to this and no one talk about this.
Thanks Hank.

When I close my iPhone and I want to open it to use it again, the opening process takes more than an hour, I regretted to buy the iPhone because of this problem that you do not suffer at all with Nokia,how I can solve this problem?

When I close my iPhone and I want to open it to use it again, the opening process takes more than an hour, I regretted to buy the iPhone because of this problem that you do not suffer at all with Nokia,how I can solve this problem?

mostafa182 wrote:
... how I can solve this problem?
The Basic Troubleshooting Steps are:
Restart... Reset... Restore from Backup... Restore as New...
Restart / Reset
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1430
Backing up, Updating and Restoring
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1414
If you try all these steps and you still have issues... Then a Visit to an Apple Store or AASP (Authorized Apple Service Provider) is the Next Step...
Be sure to make an appointment first...

Ldap search query takes more than 10 seconds

LDAP query takes more than 10 seconds to execute.
For validating the policy configured, the Acess Manager(Sun Java System Access Manager) contacts the LDAP (Sun Java System Directory Server 6.2) to get the users in a dynamic group. The time out value configured in Access Manager for LDAP searches is 10 seconds.
Issue : The ldap query takes more than 10 seconds to execute at some times .
The query is executing with less than 10 seconds in most of the cases, but it takes more than 10 seconds in some cases. The total number of users available in the ldap is less than 1500.
7 etime =1
6 etime =1
102 etime=4
51 etime=5
26 etime=6
5 etime=7
4 etime=8
From the ldap access logs we can see the following entry,some times the query takes more than 10 seconds,
[28/May/2012:14:21:26 +0200] conn=281 op=41433 msgId=853995 - SRCH base="dc=****,dc=****,dc=com" scope=2 filter="(&(&(***=true)(**=true))(objectClass=vfperson))" attrs=ALL
[28/May/2012:14:21:36 +0200] conn=281 op=41434 msgId=854001 - ABANDON targetop=41433 msgid=853995 nentries=884 etime=10
The query was aborted by the access manger after 10 seconds.
Please post your suggestions to resolve this issue .
1.How we can find out , why the query is taking more than 10 seconds ?
2.Next steps to resolve this issue .

Hi Marco,
Thanks for your suggestions.
Sorry for replying late. I was out of office for few weeks.
1) Have you already tuned the caches? (entry cache, db cache, filesystem cache?)
We are using db cache and we have not done any turning for cache. The application was working fine and there was no much changes in the number of users .
2) Unfortunately we don't have direct access to the environment and we have contacted the responsible team to verify the server health during the issue .
Regarding the IO operations we can see that, load balancer is pinging the ldap sever every 15 seconds to check the status of ldap servers which yields a new connection on every hit. (on average per minute 8 connections - )
3) We using cn=dsameuser to bind the directory server. Other configuration details for ldap
LDAP Connection Pool Minimum Size: 1
LDAP Connection Pool Maximum Size:10
Maximum Results Returned from Search: 1700
Search Timeout: 10
Is the Search Timeout value configured is proper ? ( We have less than 1500 user in the ldap server).
Also is there any impact if the value Maximum Results Returned from Search = set to 1700. ( The Sun document for AM says that the ideal value for this is 1000 and if its higher than this it will impact performance.
The application was running without time out issue for last 2 years and there was no much increase in the number of users in the system. ( at the max 200 users added to the system in last 2 years.)
Thanks,
Jay

BSEG Table takes more time

Hi Experts,
Users raising bill using MIRO it takes more time when i check throuh SM50 and st03 i found that the data fectching from the table BSEG takes more time kinldy let me know whether i need to increase table parameter.....size if so how can i do that ?
Regards...
Venki

The famous BSEG table is a cluster table.
It holds the Accounting Document Segment. It is part of the Pool cluster RFBLG and lives in the package: FBAS (Financial accounting 'Basis').
You can't read a cluster table exactly the way you read a database (old speak, transparent table).
You can use a program to read called RFPPWF05
Note 435694: Display BSEG item by calling FB09D (modified FB09)
Other possiblity: Other possibility: CALL DIALOG 'RF_ZEILEN_ANZEIGE', but since this is a dialog I don't think this would work.
In any event go to FBAS Package (development class) to see your business objects, class library and functions.
Having such criticality, you set to tablepsace to 'autogrow'
Regards
Sekhar

Generate More Documents From FB01

Good Morning,
I Want to generate in automatic from FB01 more documents when i register a single document accounting.
My Problem is generate another document for a single Profit Center in automatic.
Anyone can help me?
Thanks

Dear Stefano,
It may be possible to achieve your goal if you create an account assignment to the particular profict center for the Cost Element/GL Account you are posting to in transaction OBO8. In this way when ever you make a posting to the GL Account/Cost Element a posting to the Profit center will also take place. This can also include cost center and internal order and can be statistical posting.
Please review transaction OB08 and view the F1 help for further information.
I hope this helps and I wish you the best of luck in your endeavours.
Kind Regards,
Brendan

How do I create my own favorite template for DVD slideshows? I used to be able to select this from pulldown menu, but cannot now do so. I am directed straight to templates, which take more memory. I have a large slideshow, and need all the space I can get

First, how do I create my own favorite theme template for DVD slideshows? I used to be able to select this from pulldown menu, but cannot now do so. I am directed straight to already existing themes, which take more memory. I have a large slideshow, and need all the space I can get. I just want to use a picture as my DVD cover, and then insert a slideshow. Also, when I try to burn my 8.5gb double sided slideshow, all that burns is the music. It is a large slideshow, a memorial on the life of my now deceased brother. This means a lot to me and to my family, and I am having so much trouble trying to burn it. I have gone into Project View and selected appropriately. The bar shows I have room to burn this DVD, but it does not burn. I have burned so many DVDs in the past, but this one just will not burn. I am so confused at this point. I will say this is the first 8.5gb I have attempted to create and burn. My specs list a 7.7gb or 4.7gb as operable....but there are no 7.7gb dvds. I had to purchase 8.5gb. Help? What am I doing wrong? I have spent so much time on this, and just cannot figure it out.

Final Cut is a separate, higher end video editor. The pro version of iMovie.
Give iPhoto a look at for creating the slideshow. It's easy to assemble the photos in an album in iPhoto, put them in the order you want and then make a slideshow of them. You can select from various themes and transitions between slides and add music from your iTunes library.
When you have the slidshow as you want use the Export button at the bottom of the iPhoto window and export with Size = Medium or Large.
Save the resulting Quicktime movie file in your Movies folder.
Next, open iDVD, choose your theme and drag the QT movie file into the menu window being careful to avoid any drop zones.
Then follow this workflow to help assure the best qualty video DVD:
Once you have the project as you want it save it as a disk image via the File ➙ Save as Disk Image menu option. This will separate the encoding process from the burn process.
To check the encoding mount the disk image, launch DVD Player and play it. If it plays OK with DVD Player the encoding is good.
Then burn to disk with Disk Utility or Toast at the slowest speed available (2x-4x) to assure the best burn quality. Always use top quality media: Verbatim, Maxell or Taiyo Yuden DVD-R are the most recommended in these forums.
The reason I suggest iPhoto is that I find it much easier to use than iMovie (except for the older iMovie 6 HD version). Personal preferences showing here.

How to do Query optimization?It takes more time to fetch the record from db. Very urgent, I need your assistance

Hi all
I want to fetch just twenty thousands records from table. My query take more time to fetch twenty thousands records. I post my working query, Could you correct the query for me. thanks in advance.
Query
select
b.Concatenated_account Account,
b.Account_description description,
SUM(case when(Bl.ACTUAL_FLAG='B') then
((NVL(Bl.PERIOD_NET_DR, 0)- NVL(Bl.PERIOD_NET_CR, 0)) + (NVL(Bl.PROJECT_TO_DATE_DR, 0)- NVL(Bl.PROJECT_TO_DATE_CR, 0)))end) "Budget_2011"
from
gl_balances Bl,
gl_code_combinations GCC,
psb_ws_line_balances_i b ,
gl_budget_versions bv,
gl_budgets_v gv
where
b.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=gcc.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and bl.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=gcc.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and
bl.budget_version_id =bv.BUDGET_VERSION_ID and gv.budget_version_id= bv.budget_version_id
and gv.latest_opened_year in (select latest_opened_year-3 from gl_budgets_v where latest_opened_year=:BUDGET_YEAR )
group by b.Concatenated_account ,b.Account_description

Hi,
If this question is related to SQL then please post in SQL forum.
Otherwise provide more information how this sql is being used and do you want to tune the SQL or the way it fetches the information from DB and display in OAF.
Regards,
Sandeep M.

Takes more time to start & shutdown the database

Hi All,
I have created a database in oracle9i by following manual steps. Every thing was created successfully and am able to start the database and shutdown also.
but the problem is while giving the startup command it takes more time to start the database and the same during the shutdown. So anyone help me..
the follwing are the pfile specifications:
db_name=practice
instance_name=practice
control_files= 'E:\practice\control\control1.ctl',
'D:\practice\control\control2.ctl'
db_block_size=2048
db_cache_size=20m
shared_pool_size=20m
background_dump_dest='E:\practice\bdump'
user_dump_dest='E:\practice\udump'
Thanks in Advance

Every thing was created successfully and am able to start the database and > shutdown also.Please restate the above.
problem is while giving the startup command it takes more time to start the >database and the same during the shutdownHow have you compared? Could it be O/S resources, installation of additional software; you have not mentioned the O/S and complete version of your database.
You can review the following although I am bit unclear;
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96533/instreco.htm#440322
Adith

Select Query Takes more time

Hi All,
I have cloned KSB1 tcode to custom one as required by business.
Below query takes more time than excepted.
Here V_DB_TABLE = COVP.
Values in Where clause are as follows
OBNJR in ( KSBB010000001224 BT KSBB012157221571)
GJAHR in blank
VERSN in '000'
WRTTP in '04' and '11'
all others are blank
VT_VAR_COND = ( CPUDT BETWEEN '20091201' and '20091208' )
SELECT (VT_FIELDS) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF GS_COVP_EXT
                    FROM (V_DB_TABLE)
                    WHERE LEDNR = '00'
                    AND   OBJNR IN LR_OBJNR
                    AND   GJAHR IN GR_GJAHR
                    AND   VERSN IN GR_VERSN
                    AND   WRTTP IN GR_WRTTP
                    AND   KSTAR IN LR_KSTAR
                    AND   PERIO IN GR_PERIO
                    AND   BUDAT IN GR_BUDAT
                    AND   PAROB IN GR_PAROB
                    AND   (VT_VAR_COND).
Checked in table for this condition it has only 92 entries.
But when i execute program takes long time as 3 Hrs.
Could any one help me on this

>1.Dont use SELECT/ENDSELECT instead use INTO TABLE addition .
> 2.Avoid using corresponding addition.create a type and reference it.
> If the select is going for dump beacause of storage limitations ,then use Cursors.
you got three large NOs .... all three recommendations are wrong!
The SE16 test is going in the right direction ... but what was filled. Nobody knows!!!!
Select options:
Did you ever try to trace the SE16? The generic statement has for every field an in-condition!
Without the information what was actually filled, nobody can say something there
are at least 2**n combinations possible!
Use ST05 for SE16 and check actual statement plus explain!

Query takes more time from client

Hi,
I have a select query (which refers to views and calls a function), which fetches results in 2 secs when executed from database. But takes more than 10 mins from the client.
The tkprof for the call from the client is given below. Could you please suggest, what is going wrong and how this can be addressed?
The index IDX_table1_1 is on col3.
Trace file: trace_file.trc
Sort options: exeela
count    = number of times OCI procedure was executed
cpu      = cpu time in seconds executing
elapsed = elapsed time in seconds executing
disk     = number of physical reads of buffers from disk
query    = number of buffers gotten for consistent read
current = number of buffers gotten in current mode (usually for update)
rows     = number of rows processed by the fetch or execute call
SELECT ROUND(SUM(NVL((col1-col2),(SYSDATE - col2)
FROM
table1 WHERE col3 = :B1 GROUP BY col3
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute   7402      0.27       7.40          0          0          0           0
Fetch     7402      1.13      59.37       1663      22535          0        7335
total    14804      1.40      66.77       1663      22535          0        7335
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 32 (ORADBA)   (recursive depth: 1)
Rows     Execution Plan
      0 SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
      0   SORT (GROUP BY NOSORT)
      0    TABLE ACCESS   MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'table1'
               (TABLE)
      0     INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_table1_1'
                (INDEX)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait Total Waited
----------------------------------------   Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read                      1663        1.37         57.71
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
total        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait Total Waited
----------------------------------------   Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read                     16039        3.09        385.04
db file scattered read                         34        0.21          1.42
latch: cache buffers chains                    26        0.34          2.14
SQL*Net break/reset to client                   2        0.05          0.05
SQL*Net message to client                       2        0.00          0.00
SQL*Net message from client                     2       79.99         79.99
SQL*Net message to dblink                       1        0.00          0.00
SQL*Net message from dblink                     1        0.00          0.00
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute   7402      0.27       7.40          0          0          0           0
Fetch     7402      1.13      59.37       1663      22535          0        7335
total    14804      1.40      66.77       1663      22535          0        7335
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait Total Waited
----------------------------------------   Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read                      1663        1.37         57.71
    1 user SQL statements in session.
    0 internal SQL statements in session.
    1 SQL statements in session.
    1 statement EXPLAINed in this session.
Trace file: trace_file.trc
Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00
Sort options: exeela
       1 session in tracefile.
       1 user SQL statements in trace file.
       0 internal SQL statements in trace file.
       1 SQL statements in trace file.
       1 unique SQL statements in trace file.
       1 SQL statements EXPLAINed using schema:
           ORADBA.prof$plan_table
             Default table was used.
             Table was created.
             Table was dropped.
   84792 lines in trace file.
    4152 elapsed seconds in trace file.Edited by: agathya on Feb 26, 2010 8:39 PM

I have a select query (which refers to views and calls a function), which fetches results in 2 secs when >executed from database. But takes more than 10 mins from the client.You are providing proof for the latter part of your statement above.
But not for the former part (fetches in 2 secs when exec'd from db).
It would have been nice if you also provide the sql-trace information for that.
Without it we cannot help you much. Other than making the observation that you obviously have a query that is I/O bound, and that I/O on your system is rather slow: on average an I/O takes 0.04 seconds (66.77 divided by 1663).

Splitting an event takes more than 3 min

Hi,
I have about 8.000 photos in my library and 2.500 photos in a single event. Now I want to extract a set of pictures from this event and move it in a new event. Is there a faster way doing this than splitting the event before and after the set of pictures? This created 3 events and then I have to move the 3rd event back into the first, the 2nd event is what I want to keep.
BTW, with over 8.000 pictures in the library, is it normal that splitting an event takes more than 3 minutes?

Danielle
Flag the pics you want to move to the new Event and the go Events -> Create Event from Flagged Photos. That will probably be faster.
BTW, with over 8.000 pictures in the library, is it normal that splitting an event takes more than 3 minutes?
I wouldn't have thought so, but it might take a while with an Event that has more that 2,500 pics in it. Remember, Events in the iPhoto Window correspond exactly with the Folders in the Originals Folder in the iPhoto Library package file (Right click on it in the Pictures Folder -> Show Package Contents). So splitting an event literally means creating a folder and moving files to it and so on.
Regards
TD

I used scripting brigde to add a movie that has size bigger than 5GB, exactly after two minutes iTunes return a failed, but the processing of the file is actually added to iTunes Library successfully. The copying take more than 5 minutes to complete. Why?

I used scripting brigde to add a movie that has size bigger than 5GB, exactly after two minutes iTunes return a failed, but the processing of the file is actually added to iTunes Library successfully. The copying take more than 5 minutes to complete. Why the iTunes Scripting Brigde returned failed when it is actually success? It occurred exactly 2 minutes after submit the request to Scripting Brigde. Is this 2 minutes related to the Apple Event time out? if it does, how do I get around this problem? thx

I can tell you that this is some of the absolutely worst customer service I have ever dealt with. I found out from a store employee that when they are really busy with calls, they have third party companies taking overflow calls. One of those companies is Xerox. What can a Xerox call center rep possibly be able to authorize on a Verizon account? I'm Sure there is a ton of misinformation out there due to this. They don't note the accounts properly or so everyone can see them. I have been transferred before and have asked if they work for Verizon or a third party also and was refused an answer so, apparently they aren't required to disclose that information. I spent a long time in the store on my last visit and it's not just customers that get the runaround. It happens to the store employees as well and it's beyond frustrating.

DMS_RELOCATE_CONTENT take more documents you whant!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for