DNG Format incompatible to Photoshop CS2 ?

Hello, I'm using since several years Lightroom beginng from the Version 1.0 to the actual Version 5.7.
Now I have a big problem with the DNG-Format. I export my photo files after developping as DNG.
Importing these DNG-Files to Photoshop (CS2 with ACR 3.7) was never a big problem.
Now several very important corrections are lost in Photoshop. For example the exposure correction.
What has happened?
Thanks a lot for any helping answers
Geo

Did you double check that you have the DNG export backwards compatible to ACR 3.7 (2.4 and later)?
Benjamin

Similar Messages

  • Unable to see DNG files in Photoshop CS2

    Hi:
    I am using Photoshop CS2 in Windows XP Pro and have *.CR2 pictures taken with Canon EOS 40D.
    I downloaded Camera_Raw_3.7.zip and extracted Camera Raw.8bi to C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adobe\Plug-Ins\CS2\File Formats
    I downloaded Adobe DNG Converter ver. 4.3.1 and converted the Canon CR2 files to DNG files.
    I can see the pictures in Adobe Bridge CS2 1.0.4.6 fine.
    However, when I open Adobe Photoshop CS2 and try File/open, the drop down does not show any selection for DNG files. If I try to physically drag a file into Photoshop, I get the message that the extension is not supported.
    Upon opening Help/About Plug-In, I do not see Camera raw anywhere in the long list.
    What do I need to do to bring DNG files into Photoshop?
    Thanks.

    If you don't see Camera Raw in the list it usually means that it is not in the correct folder or the it might be damaged.
    It looks like you listed the correct folder at C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adobe\Plug-Ins\CS2\File Formats
    When you navigate to that folder do you see Camera Raw.8bi listed? It might only say Camera Raw, depending on how you have Windows set up.
    Did you restart Photoshop after putting the filter into the File Formats folder?

  • Using Adobe Photoshop CS2 version 9 and have updated it, but when stacking photos, it comes up with PSD, whereas I want Jpeg, and I change the format to Jpeg and the box then comes up with cannot save as there is a program error. Be very grateful for help

    Using Adobe Photoshop CS2 version 9 and have updated it, but when stacking photos, it comes up with PSD, whereas I want Jpeg, and I change the format to Jpeg and the box then comes up with cannot save as there is a program error. Be very grateful for help with this, please.

    jpg does not support Layers.
    Just to make sure, what exactly do you mean by "stacking photos" and what do you want to achieve thereby?

  • Photoshop CS2 won't save files in JPEG format

    I have Windows Vista and am using Photoshop CS2 Version 9.
    Until today everything was working fine, but there are two problems.
    1. Only today I have a limited amount of formats to save a .PSD file in:
    PSD, CIN, PDF, RAW, PNG, and TIFF.
    Whereas if I want to save a JPEG file per say as another format, I get the full list to choose from.
    2. If I choose a layer on an image, not all the filters show up that I can run it through. The 'Artistic, Brush Strokes, Pixelate, Sketch, and Stylize' are not clickable.
    Thank you.

    You slipped into 16 bit mode. Try going back to 8 bit.

  • Photoshop CS2 obsolete with an Olympus E-3

    I just received my new Olympus E-3 this week and it is a very impressive professional DSLR camera. I have to say that I am exceedingly disappointed with Adobe right now as it looks like they are no longer supporting Photoshop CS2 even though it is only one revision old. With the latest updates I can use their digital negative converter (which I wish more camera manufacturers would support) and my Photoshop Elements 5.0, including Camera RAW, works with the E-3 ORF/RAW files. Photoshop CS2 apparently has no plug-in for it, the latest Camera RAW doesn't work in it or in Bridge, and it no longer accepts new .dng files sent to it from PSE5. It is now largely useless to me as I can't used it until the photos are degraded .jpg's.
    I am on Vista, so is their anything I need to do, or is my analysis above correct? CS-2 over CS had enough to make me upgrade, CS-3 over CS-2 didn't.

    Nobody likes the fact that to get the latest raw support for the latest
    camera (without hoop jumping) you have to upgrade Photoshop. Most of don't
    think it is fair. However, there are some things to keep in mind.
    1. Each new major release of Photoshop brings massive updates to ACR. These
    updates would not be an easy or really cost effective thing to do for older
    versions of ACR.
    2. It is very likely that updates to ACR are not solely in ACR itself. I
    would imagine that some changes have to be made to Photoshop to. This means
    they couldn't update ACR to work with CS2 because CS2 is lacking things that
    would be needed. Things that are only in CS3.
    3. Even if Adobe charged $19.95 for the ACR upgrade for Photoshop CS2 if
    they couldn't bring it inline with CS3's ACR but only could add support for
    new cameras people would still complain.
    4. There is a work around, download the latest DNG converter program, it is
    free and convert your raw images to DNG. This is in my book a good thing
    anyways. Just as soon as DNG becomes and ISO standard it will be the safest
    raw format available. In other words it will be the most future proof raw
    format we will have. Once your files are converted to DNG you can then load
    them in to the ACR that comes with CS2.
    Myself, I think the mistake Adobe made was not making the camera support a
    plug-in for ACR. By doing this they could have simply updated ACR as they
    wished giving you the new version with each new version of Photoshop, but
    allowed people with the old versions to use new cameras because you would
    only have to download new profile plug-ins for new cameras. I don't see new
    cameras as being a major reason to upgrade ACR. I see the new features and
    improvements made to each new version of ACR more of an upgrade draw than
    new camera support. I think Adobe would have lost very little income by
    designing ACR to support new cameras by doing plug-ins. I would still have
    upgraded from CS2 to CS3.
    Of course there is also the new upgrade policy. Photoshop 7 is the oldest
    version you can now use to upgrade to Photoshop CS3. If you have a version
    older than 7 you have to buy the full Photoshop package, you can't upgrade.
    When Photoshop CS4 comes out then CS1 will be the oldest version you can use
    to upgrade. So sooner rather than later unless you like to buy full packages
    instead of upgrades one is going to have to upgrade anyways.
    Myself I would use the DNG converter now and then upgrade Photoshop when CS4
    comes out. I figure CS4 is less than a year away.

  • Camera Raw, Photoshop CS2 and Nikon D40

    Can't open camera raw images from my Nikon D40 in Photoshop CS2.
    I downloaded the camera raw plug-in (3.7) but still cannot open the images.
    Many problems:
    1) I don't have the folder described in the instructions Library>Application Support>Adobe>Plug-ins>CS2?File Formats. My plug-ins are located inside my Photoshop folder. Even after I put the camera raw 3.7 in the plug-ins folder, it doesn't show up under "About Plug-ins."
    2) I don't have an NEF plug-in anywhere. I searched the places mentioned in forums as well as a my entire computer.
    Help!

    Just one note of clarification that you need to understand. You do NOT have to match the version of the DNG converter with your version of Photoshop. You always want to use the latest version of the DNG converter. It will convert images from all of the most recent cameras that ACR supports. So, currently (as of today) you want to be using DNG converter version 4.4.1. It will create DNG files that will be compatible with any version of ACR back to version 2.4 which works with Photoshop CS.
    The other thing to verify is what version of Camera Raw is installed on your computer. You want to make sure you are using version 3.7, because that is the last version that was created for Photoshop CS2. If you are using a Windows computer, open Photoshop and then go to Help/About Plug-Ins and click on Camera Raw. It should only be listed once; if it is listed more than once you have a problem. A dialog will appear that will indicate what version is installed. If it is anything other than ACR 3.7, then you don't have the latest version available.
    Be aware that there will never be another update of ACR for Photoshop CS2. But if you keep track of the updates and always keep the latest version of the DNG converter on your computer you will have support for every camera that is supported by ACR.
    I don't know if any of this information is helpful to you. I just want to help you understand how to integrate DNG files into your workflow.

  • Opening .CR2 files in Photoshop CS2

    I am trying to see if it possible to open .CR2 RAW files in Photoshop CS2, which brings up the message " Could not complete our request because it is not eh right kind of document"
    I have tried updating the Raw Plug in line with Adobe's website and putting the .8BI file into File Formats folder, but this does not seem to solve the problem.
    Adobe on line chat will not help.
    Any advice gratefully received.

    It appears support was added for the 40D in ACR 4.2, while CS2 will only support up to ACR 3.7.
    Windows: Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Windows : Adobe DNG Converter 8.7
    Macintosh: Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Macintosh : Adobe DNG Converter 8.7
    Benjamin

  • Wo bekomme ich den Camera Raw Plug in für Photoshop Cs2

    Ich habe Photoshop CS2. Ich kann keine Raw Dateien öffnen. Deshalb suche ich die Plug Ins.

    Da gibt's keine Plugins. Bei deiner Photoshop ist ACR (Adobe Camera RAW) dabei, aber deine Uralt-Version kann mit den RAW-Dateien der modernen Kamreas nichts anfangen.
    Entweder du besorgst dir eine neue Version von Photoshop oder Lightroom oder du konvertierst deine RAW-Dateien in das DNG-Format.
    Den entsprechenden Konverter findest du hier:
    MAC -> Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Macintosh : Adobe DNG Converter 8.5
    Windiws -> Adobe - Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter : For Windows : Adobe DNG Converter 8.5
    Axel

  • Can't open .NEF files in Photoshop CS2

    Heres the deal: I've updated and installed my camera raw in Photoshop CS2, so I have the latest version of it (ACR 3.7). I still can not open my .NEF files in Photoshop and when I view the files from Bridge it shows the generic thumbnail image.
    Information that might help:
    PS Version: Photoshop CS2
    ACR Version: Camera Raw 3.7
    Camera: Nikon D60
    Operating Sys: Mac OSX
    Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

    The D60 was not supported in ACR 3.7.  In fact, that version was the first to support the D40.  You will have to use the latest version of the DNG converter to convert your raw images to DNG.  Then you can open those files in ACR 3.7.

  • Photoshop CS2 RAW (NEF) Issue

    Hi,
    My RAW (.NEF) files will not open in Photoshop CS2. Everytime I try to open a raw image it says...
    "Could not complete your request because Photoshop does not recognize this type of file"
    Don't know what to do. CS2 on OSX 10.5.8 with Nikon D90 photos.
    I'm going to take a guess here and it has something to do with the Nikon software provided to transfer the photos from the camera/sdhc card?
    I'm assuming the software (Nikon Transfer/ViewNX) has overwritten some Adobe plugin or driver?
    Anyways, someone please help! I need to edit my photos and this is a pain in the A!
    Thanks
    Cheers
    Mike

    Your camera needs the Adobe Camera Raw plug-in version 4.6 or 5.xx.
    Neither will work with CS2 – you need to upgrade Photoshop or use the DNG converter.
    Get it here: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=4619

  • Photoshop CS2 won't install on a Powerbook

    I've been trying to install PS CS2 all day today and it keeps failing. It'll get through the welcoming and licensing process, but once I authenticate, the installer prepares my volume and then stop immediately after the installer script begins to run. The following message is shown in the installer window:
    There were errors installing this software
    Please try installing again.
    I checked the installer log and it shows that my volume is not supported:
    Target volume type not supported:
    Apple_HFSX
    Jun 10 13:37:43 Dan-Rosellinis-Computer : preflight[1166]:
    Jun 10 13:37:43 Dan-Rosellinis-Computer : Install failed: The following install step failed: run preflight script for Adobe Photoshop CS2
    I tried all the suggestions by Adobe, (removing fonts, reboot with extensions off, disconnected all external devices) and I tried to install this on a iBook and an external volume, but still no luck.
    Anyone have any suggestions?
    17 Powerbook 1.33 GHz G4   Mac OS X (10.3)  
    17 Powerbook 1.33 GHz G4   Mac OS X (10.3)  

    After talking to Adobe's help desk and trying several things that didn't work, I went back to the install log. Specifically the part that said the target disk wasn't supported. I replaced by internal drive about a year ago, because it was failing, and I formatted the new drive as Case Sensitive Journaled". The Adobe tech said that that wouldn't be the problem, but after a Google search on Case Sensitive Journaled (CSJ), I found several cases of install errors of Adobe Creative Suite when attempting to install on a drive formated as CSJ.
    I made a disk copy of my drive using Carbon Copy Cloner then, using Disk Utility from the install disk, reformatted my drive and restored it from the disk image. Rebooted and all worked well, even the install of PSCS2. As a bonus, my copy of Macromedia Contribute now works again. Go figure....
    17 Powerbook 1.33 GHz G4   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

  • Camera Raw 4.0 unusable in Photoshop CS2

    If you have Photoshop CS2 and you download the latest RAW 4.0 update, forget about opening any RAW files from cameras produced in the past year and a half or so. As a clever marketing move Adobe has disabled all functionality for RAW cameras once covered under RAW versions 3.0 through 3.7 when using the RAW version 4.0 in Photoshop CS2. Why would they do that, you ask? To sell more software, of course!
    The RAW 4.0 update adds only the Panasonic DMC-FZ8, a camera that I recently purchased. But, if I want to view RAW files from this camera I have to upgrade to Photoshop CS3 or buy Lightroom 1.0, and that is exactly what Adobe is hoping. Suddenly my Photoshop CS2 program has become obsolete because in addition I can no longer open RAW files from my Nikon D200. What is so difficult about making the RAW 4.0 plug-in compatible with other more recent Photoshop programs? Absolutely nothing! Adobe cares more about selling new software than they do about customer loyalty. Such a marketing practice is unfortunate and, in my mind, reflects poorly on Adobe's business ethics.

    "I think a nice compromise to the ACR things is to design the next full version of upgrade of ACR (in this case 4.0) so that it will work with the last version of Adobe Photoshop (in this case CS2)."
    Yeah, ok, here's the problem with that...Mac CS2 required 10.3.9 or above...Win CS2 required Win 2K or XP/SP2...Photoshop CS3 (and Camera Raw 4.0) requires Mac 10.4.8 and Win, XP/SP2 or Vista.
    So, you code to the latest APIs of the system (10.4.x, XP/SP2 or Vista) and you are supposed to magically make a plug-in work on older APIs of the previous version of Photoshop? Even though, to progress and advance (and hopefully optimize) you commit to using the new APIs. So, how ya gonna make Camera Raw 4.0 work in Photoshop CS2-disable it for 10.3.9 and Win 2K? Forget about using new API's and suffer through the old ones?
    So, you say, well, just keep updating Camera Raw 3.x...ok, for how long? Forever? For 1 quarter? For a year?
    So, you got the Camera Raw engineering team (3 guys) taking time away from Camera Raw 4 to re-write code for Camera Raw 3 for cameras that weren't even sold when Camera Raw 3.x shipped...you ok with that? You realize that it will drain resources from new products with new features, but that's ok. . .you want Adobe to support old products even though they no longer sell them.
    I suppose in a perfect world, that would be ok. But as a user of the current Photoshop CS3 and Camera Raw 4, I would want the engineers to be concentrating their time and energy working on what they ARE selling right now. Adding new cameras to Camera Raw 4. Adding new functionality to Camera Raw 4.
    People have a pretty skewed view of software, IMHO. They drop down bucks for HARDWARE and expect the software to be upgraded forever, for free. There's just as much value in intangible personal property (software) as there is in tangible personal property (hardware). And...it ain't like these shiny new cameras don't come with the camera maker's software...and Adobe STILL provides support for new cameras in old versions via DNG...which, BTW is free...
    Big ol' bad Adobe, out there trying to screw their customers...I don't think so. They bend over backwards to do the right things, but of course, to some people, even that's not enough.

  • LIghtRoom color problem vs PhotoShop CS2 on Nikon RAW

    I recently bought Adobe Lightroom and I was surprised to notice some huge color differences compared to PhotoShop CS2.
    Im using Nikon D80 and shooting RAW. I have calibrated semi-pro monitor.
    The same RAW file opens in LightRoom pretty well until you get the rendering preview. Once the preview is done, the picture becomes desaturated in red and blue and has a green cast especially in the shadows with much lower contrast. If I use Edit in PhotoShop option, the picture becomes even worse (even more desaturated and greenish) when opens in PhotoShop. If I open the same RAW in PhotoShop directly (using the NEF plug-in, not CameraRaw!) everything is just fine. The picture looks as opened in Nikon Picture Project or as I saw it when I took the picture.
    After doing some research, I think that my problem relates to the way that Adobe Camera RAW, Bridge and LightRoom open a Nikon sRGB 4.0.0.3001 (D80) raw file. However, all the things being equal, PhotoShop CS2 (using the NEF plug-in) renders the same colors as Picture Project does (and what I saw on my camera and in reality). I also noticed that choosing sRGB in Camera Raw bring the things closer to the Picture Project colors but far from identical. Anyways, there is no way to change anything in LightRoom, outer than manually twicking all colors until I think it looks good. Which, I think Is very subjective and is different for every picture.
    Right now, my Creative Suite Color Settings is North America General Purpose 2 (synchronized for all CS applications) and no application asks me anything about changing the color profile when opening the file. I shoot (with D80) in raw, Normal camera mode (no saturation / contrast, color profile change). I opened the same file in all mentionned applications (LightRoom, CameraRaw from Bridge, PhotoShop and Picture Project) and save them as .jpeg (same size, dpi, etc.) without changing anything (no camera calibration in ACR or LR; no printer profile in PhotoShop). I sent the .jpegs to my local Costco and printed them on glossy paper. All of them printed the same way that they look on the screen. LR, ACR - desaturated on red&blue, color cast on green and low contrast, while great vivid colors and contrast from PhotoShop and Picture Project. For me it looks pretty much as Adobe applications convert Nikon sRGB into a very unappealing Adobe sRGB (and way different from what I saw in reality). I know this is very subjective; some people may argue that Nikon profile is too reddish and oversaturated. But I find the whole story rather unusual. They all work in the sRGB space and there shouldn't be any differences. I've done lot of testing with color profiles and replacing the Camera Raw plugin file format (common files) with Nicon plugins and vice-versa. But still the same result.
    I create a User Profile in LightRoom and I get pretty decent colors now, but when I want to edit the file in PhotoShop (from LightRoom) I get the same green and desaturated version.
    What do you think?

    >Regarding LR, what I'm looking here is a "factory made" solution; something that can give consistent results in the initial conversion (like Nikon plugin for PhotoShop, for e.g.)
    The problem with that conversion is that you cannot change it. In lightroom you change the actual conversion parameters, which gives you far more leeway and allows for far better conversions in the end. Currently (this will change with Lightroom 2.0 apparently) the only recourse you have if you prefer Nikon's colors is to shoot jpeg, or run your NEFs through capture and create 16-bit tiffs. This is just the way it is. A hammer gives a different result than a screwdriver.
    >It's hard for me to believe that Adobe has invested so much energy and resources in color profiling but it's unable to get nearly close to the Nikon raw colors.
    Nikon's colors are far from colorimetrically correct which you can see in many tests. Here is an example for the D300: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D300/D300IMATEST.HTM It is off in the deep reds, the saturated blues, and the Olive-like colors. Profiling the camera does not help you get close to Nikon's colors, but it will get you closer to the ideal colors. I doubt it has been Adobe's goal to get close to the in-camera rendering with Lightroom upto 1.4. They profile all the cameras and make some value judgments on what is more important. Skin tones vs saturated colors etc just like Nikon does.
    Regarding getting close to camera colors, there is a trick that you can do to get close to the camera jpeg that involves the ACR calibration scripts. You do need PS CS3 though.
    >I find rather strange that apparently there is no way to get professional conversion. This is defying the main purpose of Color Profiling, I think.
    Why is Nikon's conversion professional and Adobe's not? They are both just interpretations of the sensor data. Adobe's is actually colorimetrically more correct in many cases. Colorimetrically correct often means boring unfortunately. This has to do with the fact that our eyes are not color measurement devices but that we have brains interpreting the data. To get pleasing results, Color Profiling does not help as much as you'd like. My issue with the in-camera or Nikon software approach is that it locks you down creatively to the
    creative choices the Nikon folks made. Now, be aware that in the Lightroom 2.0 forum the Adobe folks have hinted at major changes to the rendering engine that will bring colors closer to the vendor rendering. How they will do this is unknown right now.

  • PhotoShop CS2 and PDF Presets question.

    Hello,
    I have installed the recent free release of Adobe Photoshop CS2 on my Win 8.1 PC.
    I am creating the artwork for a CD Cover, by using a CYMK template from CD-Baby.
    They require that the finished artwork be submitted to them in PDF format, using the [PDF/X-4:2008] preset.
    I found that Photoshop CS2 didn't come with this preset, but after searching the web, I came across this forum whereby a user posted a link to a "JobOptions" archive file at...
         http://dl.dropbox.com/u/16243351/joboptions.rar
    ... I downloaded this RAR file and found that there was a file inside called "x4;2008.joboptions"
    I installed this preset by the 'EDIT/Adobe PDF Presets/' route, and it seemed to successfully install the preset.
    (No errors at least).
    Now when I go to save my finished project as PDF, I am given the choice of...
    * [PDF/X-1a:2001]
    * [PDF/X-3:2002]
    * x4;2008
    (this is the exact description of each preset).
    My only question is, do you think the desired [PDF/X-4:2008] was correctly installed?,
    I'm not sure since the naming format is not exactly the same as the first 2 presets descriptions.
    Thank you.

    thanks for your reply  Mylenium.
    is it possible that this user preset might not exactly conform to the desired preset I'm after?
    is there any way I can get a genuine copy of the factory preset [PDF/X-4:2008]?
    thanks.

  • Can't convert Canon CR2 RAW files to photoshop CS2- please help!

    I have a Canon EOS Rebel XT and am using Photoshop CS2 and can not open my Raw images. Canon saves the images as a CS2 file. I guess needs converting.. Please Help!!

    Daag Kees,
    >[Kees] DNG converter 4_3_1 don't convert my raw Leica M8- images to digital negatives files that will open in Photoshop CS 8.0.1. (Camera raw 2.0).
    Of course not. You need ACR (Camera Raw) version 2.4. Version 2.0 does NOT support DNGs.
    After you correctly install ACR 2.4 according to the instructions on the download page and after you relaunch Photoshop, you need to Purge the Cache for each folder.
    >[Michael] Simply run the DNG converter and point it at your M8 raw files and they will be converted to DNG.
    Nope. Point the DNG Converter to a folder containing RAW files, not to the raw files themselves. The DNG Converter works on Folders containing raw files, not on individual files.
    >What means "using Bridge" ?
    Forget that. It does NOT apply to Photoshop 8.x. In CS3, you can have ACR hosted either by Photoshop or by Bridge. Photoshop 8.x doesn't even have Bridge.
    Prettige Kerstdagen!

Maybe you are looking for

  • Issues with a T61 harddisk, UNMOUNTABLE_BOOT_VOLUME, cannot also get in the Rescue and Recovery

    Dear Lenovo Support Community, I have a T61 with XP pro on it. This is the history of my harddisk problems with it: (the harddisk is HDD0 Fujitsu MHW21160BJ G1 and everything in laptop (HW and SW) are same as the factory sold one) 1. Unfortunately I

  • Second Display Question

    I am running the 23" Cinema Display (ATI X1900 card). I have an older Studio 17" display which I would like to use as a second display. Does the Apple DVI to ADC Display Adapter work for the Mac Pro?? Thanks!! Sky.....

  • P7 7 installtion latest installtion

    Hi we want fresh installtion of pi 7 in   Latest  version but i am confuse whic are the latest cd avilalabe in  market place and   whic option we are seletct Means for  installtion  pi 7select the SAP EHP1 FOR SAP NETWEAVER 7.0  or SAP EHP1 FOR SAP N

  • Reinstalling Acrobat 8 professional

    I am trying to install Acrobat 8 professional on my new computer but it won't accept my serial number

  • 10g edition

    which parameter shows whether a 10g db is enterprise or standard?