Do Mac Pro 2013 support six TV using HDMI/DVI?

Hi everyone,
I found in Mac Pro support six displays using thunderbolt, but can I using HDMI or DVI?
I have six TVs, all of them have hdmi,dvi, and vga ports, I want to using one Mac Pro (2013) to display my screen in six TV as one screen, such as this:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmlsePKH6AY
Because Mac Pro using AMD display card, can I using Eyefinity technology?
Thanks a lot.

Yes. However, only two adopters can be passive. The rest have to be active.
All mini displayport to VGA adapters are active.
Mini displayport to DVI adopter can either be active or passive. The active ones say actie and cost more than passive ones.
If the display is greater than 1080X1200 you need dual-link mini displayport to DVI adapter. All the dual-link adopters are active and require USB connection for power.
I have no idea what " Eyefinity technology?" is

Similar Messages

Why mac pro 2013 not supporting illustrator GPU rendering

Here, all nvidia cards supporting this:
http://helpx.adobe.com/illustrator/kb/gpu-performance-preview-improvements.html
now I'm thinking, that buying the new mac pro 2013 maybe wasn't the best idea... Apple put in AMD GPu's, that is fine by me, but come on, give us some more support for them! Normal windows PC (for 800€) with nvidia GPU is faster at rendering in Illustrator, than my workstation mac (3500+€)! Really? O.o
And story doesn't end here. I was reading one article about GPU usage in this new mac pro and then I tested it myself. Only one GPU is used and the other is barely touched! And this goes for Maya, photoshop, illustrator and other adobe programs. I was shocked, that I discovered I have one GPU to warm up my room and only one actually doing all the work.
Ok I understand, that also software developers needs to support stuff and write their software to actually use GPU's, but adobe creative suite is one of examples, where software is actually capable of using GPU via openCL and in some cases even CUDA from nvidia.
And there is one more thing: new mac pro, has 2 identical AMD GPU's inside, which can work in crossfire configuration under windows in bootcamp, but not in OS X. Sometimes I even play some games on my mac and sometimes I'm testing them (I'm artist, but I also like to develop and test some games in my free time) and it's kinda a shame, that I can run games with better performance under windows in bootcamp.
When I bought this computer I thought this is going to rock and sweep up with all my previous machines. Well in practice it is much of unused potential and great room warmer. It's kinda sad, that on my girlfriend's PC I can play games with better frames and details on GF 660GTX than on my mac pro... I know I know, mac's aren't for gaming, but hey, sometimes it is good to get my mind on rest and blow up some enemies!
I'm not saying mac pro isn't great product, which is (very great). But support to use all computer capabilities is very limited and Apple should kick developers in their back side and push them to start developing things to use GPU's more.
I'm also not expecting Apple to jump on their feet and fix problems overnight. No, just start thinking of adding more support and things that would make our computers much more used and not only good decoration on desk. First would be a good steep adding crossfire support to OS X. That might even help at rendering some 3D scenes?
Next step would probably be better cooperation with software developers, like Adobe , Autodesk,... If adobe made good support for GPU rendering in Illustrator, aim that we get that support soon as well. I'm sometimes having a lot of paths and objects and rendering goes pretty slow then.
I'm also thinking about that AMD choice Apple made wasn't so good when you see that Nvidia puts much more effort into supporting more and more stuff, while AMD is sitting idle not even updating their drivers anymore.
Oh and one more thing: Can we please, please, please, please, preeeeeetty please get 10-bit output support on OS X? It's kinda sad, having good mac workstation with 10-bit capable monitor (dell UP2414Q) and no support for it, while other PC workstations all support it... Photoshop is working much better on OS X and here I have much better integration and everything and I really love working in Photoshop running on OS X, but some basic things are missing and I'm really asking myself sometimes: was that good decision? Photoshop was first written for macs and in 2014 there is much better support for adobe software on windows than on OS X. Where went wrong?
Don't take me wrong and think I'm just ranting here without any good reason, but think: buying very expensive computer that is supposed to make creative work easy and painless is actually just on paper. In reality computer potential is pretty much unused and that makes me thinking if I would be much better buying iMac instead of mac pro...
TL;DR: I wish for some more support from Apple for their new expensive mac pro's 2013. They are great piece of equipment, but equivalent PC's running windows are surpassing them in this department, specially when GPU's are involved. Now I would like to point this out to Apple, so I don't know where to write so they will read so I first wrote that here. I hope someone from Apple reads this and give us some feedback on those missing things or maybe I get direction where to write to Apple so I get maybe some response from them(?):
-not enough GPU support for creative software (adobe suite, autodesk,...) - nvidia + windows offering much more for less money?
-no crossfire support on OS X. Any particular reason for that?
-no 10-bit support for 10-bit displays. Why not? Hardware is capable, why software isn't?
-lack of openCL software out there. Apple isn't doing much to get more support or developers just too lazy to put more effort into this? GPGPU isn't the future as some companies are trying to convince us?

Grant Bennet-Alder wrote:
All displays are supported by one GPU -- the display GPU. The second GPU is reserved for un-interrupted GPU computing and has no Display output Hardware.
Anandtech has a discussion of this in his review of the late 2013 Mac Pro.
Under OS X the situation is a bit more complicated. There is no system-wide CrossFire X equivalent that will automatically split up rendering tasks across both GPUs.
By default, one GPU is setup for display duties while the other is used exclusively for GPU compute workloads. GPUs are notoriously bad at context switching, which can severely limit compute performance if the GPU also has to deal with the rendering workloads associated with display in a modern OS. NVIDIA sought to address a similar problem with their Maximus technology, combining Quadro and Tesla cards into a single system for display and compute.
from section 9:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7603/mac-pro-review-late-2013/9
Another problem here: on windows bootcamp crossfire IS working, but not in OS X. As I wrote, sometimes it would be better to get more rendering power than computing power (actually at current state of GPU computing software, computing GPU isn't working very much if at all). It would be nice to have an option to switch on and off crossfire so we could use more rendering power when needed.
Also not all people are doing video rendering on their computers. What about 3D modelling and 2D work in photosohp? And maybe people like me are occasionally wish to play some games on their mac?
You linked me GPU usage from one program (probably adobe after effects or premiere pro or apple final cut X?), that is probably one of the only pieces of software that actually uses both GPU's under OS X. I made same experiment with software I use and I even tested some software I don't use but it is advertised it is "optimized" for mac pro like pixelmator.
And guess what? Second GPU is 99% time idle. Even when some stuff is using openCL in Photoshop, stuff is still computed on rendering GPU and not on computing one, which makes computing GPU just a good room warmer as I wrote before. Wouldn't be better to at least use second GPU for something than heating air?

Mac Pro 2013 Using Too Much RAM

I have a 6-core Mac Pro (2013) with 64GB of RAM. I have this feeling that the computer, and some assortment of processes, is sucking up a lot more of the RAM than they need to. As a point of reference, I use the vast majority of the RAM for audio production.
My concern is that, when I turn my computer on, it is already using 10 GBs of RAM right off the bat. One particular process, kernel_task, likes to use anywhere from 2-10 GBs. I can't imagine there is any reason for the Mac and all of its other processes to ever exceed even 4 GBs of RAM, let alone the upwards 20-30 that it will eventually consume. I say this because I migrated all of the data and processes form my 2010 Macbook Pro, which only has 8GB. Upon start-up, it is never using more than 2-4 GBs of RAM. I would assume, then, that my Mac Pro can get by using little more 4GBs (preserving the other 60GB for my much more resource-intensive music work). Both the MBP and Mac Pro have Mavericks 10.9.
Is there a way to cap the amount of RAM the computer, and any other process, uses, so I can preserve the majority of it for the tasks I know need it most?

Have you seen www.macperformanceguide.com ? focus is more on graphics and photography and where 128GB is shown to help.
The old method, to conserve and not use memory, went away years ago so as not to let a valuable resource sit idle and not being used.
Even if you don't have pageouts the system dynamically will use more if and when there is more memory present.
The numbers you report are not unusual. 1-2GB in today's world is like 50MB might have been 20 years ago - people were moaning over the fact that OS 7 was a memory hog as it now needed 40-50MB just to launch the Finder.

Mac Pro 2013 Slow UI Animations

I have just got a new Mac Pro, its a six core model with d300's and 64GB of RAM. My problem is that i am having real slowdown when using mission control and when sliding between spaces using the mouse. I am running 2 4K displays with "retina" mode on scaling them to 2650x1440... Though i have tested with scaling off and i still have the problem albeit slightly better than with it on...
I am beyond disappointed with this and i am really considering sending it back, is this normal or could there be something wrong with my model? My 2011 iMac handles this better even at 30 hertz its much smoother. When i use only 1 screen the animations become smooth again.. Even after a reinstall of Yosemite i still have the issues..
Is this normal? Should i send it back?

Yeah was like this from day one (Yesterday ) and i didn't upgrade from an older OS it came with Yosemite pre installed. I have since reinstalled Yosemite without any change. I have also found a way to turn off "HighDPI" by holding alt to select scaled in display preferences and choosing a low resolution option. This has returned animations to super smooth! This is heartbreaking after buying 3 4K monitors and a nearly 4 grand computer
Here is my output from EtreCheck. I know there are lots of devices plugged in but last night when checked i was doing it with a clean 2 displays \(one via HDMI and one via TB). As i run this check i am not having the issue (explained how above) but i am desperate to use the 4K displays with High DPI.
Problem description:
Mission control and space switching animations slow when using scaled desktop mode with HiDPI.
EtreCheck version: 2.0.11 (98)
Report generated 14 November 2014 13:20:16 GMT
Hardware Information: ℹ️
Mac Pro (Late 2013) (Verified)
Mac Pro - model: MacPro6,1
1 3.5 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon E5 CPU: 6-core
32 GB RAM Upgradeable
DIMM1
8 GB DDR3 ECC 1866 MHz ok
DIMM2
8 GB DDR3 ECC 1866 MHz ok
DIMM3
8 GB DDR3 ECC 1866 MHz ok
DIMM4
8 GB DDR3 ECC 1866 MHz ok
Bluetooth: Good - Handoff/Airdrop2 supported
Wireless: en2: 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
Video Information: ℹ️
AMD FirePro D300 - VRAM: 2048 MB
AMD FirePro D300 - VRAM: 2048 MB
ASUS PB287Q 2560 x 1440 @ 30 Hz
ASUS PB287Q 2560 x 1440 @ 30 Hz
System Software: ℹ️
OS X 10.10 (14A389) - Uptime: 11:52:57
Disk Information: ℹ️
APPLE SSD SM0256F disk0 : (251 GB)
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
OS (disk0s2) / [Startup]: 250.14 GB (214.42 GB free)
Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted> [Recovery]: 650 MB
USB Information: ℹ️
VIA Labs, Inc. USB3.0 Hub
Inateck composite_device 120.03 GB
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
EFI (disk15s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
Boot OS X (disk15s3) <not mounted> : 134 MB
Virtual Machines (disk17) /Volumes/Virtual Machines : 119.34 GB (11.19 GB free)
Encrypted AES-XTS Unlocked
Core Storage: disk15s2 119.69 GB Online
Inateck composite_device 500.11 GB
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
EFI (disk9s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
Boot OS X (disk9s3) <not mounted> : 134 MB
Storage (disk12) /Volumes/Storage : 499.41 GB (455.58 GB free)
Encrypted AES-XTS Unlocked
Core Storage: disk9s2 499.76 GB Online
Inateck composite_device 120.03 GB
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
WINDOWS EFI (disk10s1) <not mounted> : 367 MB
disk10s2 (disk10s2) <not mounted> : 119.66 GB
Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
VIA Labs, Inc. USB2.0 Hub
Blue Microphones Yeti Stereo Microphone
Apple, Inc. Keyboard Hub
Apple Inc. Apple Keyboard
Apple Inc. iPad
VIA Labs, Inc. USB3.0 Hub
VIA Labs, Inc. USB3.0 Hub
Western Digital Elements 107C 4 TB
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
EFI (disk6s1) <not mounted> : 315 MB
Boot OS X (disk6s3) <not mounted> : 134 MB
Delta (disk14) /Volumes/Delta : 4.00 TB (4.00 TB free)
Encrypted AES-XTS Unlocked
Core Storage: disk6s2 4.00 TB Online
Western Digital Elements 107C 4 TB
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
EFI (disk5s1) <not mounted> : 315 MB
Boot OS X (disk5s3) <not mounted> : 134 MB
Charlie (disk13) /Volumes/Charlie : 4.00 TB (3.76 TB free)
Encrypted AES-XTS Unlocked
Core Storage: disk5s2 4.00 TB Online
Western Digital Elements 10B8 2 TB
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
EFI (disk3s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
Boot OS X (disk3s3) <not mounted> : 134 MB
Time Machine (disk8) /Volumes/Time Machine : 2.00 TB (1.93 TB free)
Encrypted AES-XTS Unlocked
Core Storage: disk3s2 2.00 TB Online
Western Digital Elements 107C 4 TB
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
EFI (disk2s1) <not mounted> : 315 MB
Boot OS X (disk2s3) <not mounted> : 134 MB
Bravo (disk7) /Volumes/Bravo : 4.00 TB (1.01 TB free)
Encrypted AES-XTS Unlocked
Core Storage: disk2s2 4.00 TB Online
Western Digital Elements 107C 4 TB
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
EFI (disk1s1) <not mounted> : 315 MB
Boot OS X (disk1s3) <not mounted> : 134 MB
Alpha (disk4) /Volumes/Alpha : 4.00 TB (982.95 GB free)
Encrypted AES-XTS Unlocked
Core Storage: disk1s2 4.00 TB Online
VIA Labs, Inc. USB2.0 Hub
VIA Labs, Inc. USB2.0 Hub
Thunderbolt Information: ℹ️
Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus_2
Apple Inc. Macintosh
Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus_1
Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus_0
Kanex Thunderbolt to Gigabit Ethernet+USB3.0 Adapter
Gatekeeper: ℹ️
Mac App Store and identified developers
Kernel Extensions: ℹ️
/Applications/Parallels Desktop.app
[loaded] com.parallels.kext.hypervisor (10.0.1 27695 - SDK 10.7) Support
[loaded] com.parallels.kext.netbridge (10.0.1 27695 - SDK 10.7) Support
[loaded] com.parallels.kext.usbconnect (10.0.1 27695 - SDK 10.7) Support
[loaded] com.parallels.kext.vnic (10.0.1 27695 - SDK 10.7) Support
/Volumes/MAVERICKS/Applications/Parallels Access.app
[not loaded] com.parallels.virtualsound (1.0 22731.929773 - SDK 10.6) Support
Problem System Launch Agents: ℹ️
[failed] com.apple.accountsd.plist
[failed] com.apple.AirPlayUIAgent.plist
[failed] com.apple.bird.plist
[failed] com.apple.CallHistoryPluginHelper.plist
[failed] com.apple.CallHistorySyncHelper.plist
[failed] com.apple.cloudd.plist
[failed] com.apple.cmfsyncagent.plist
[failed] com.apple.coreservices.appleid.authentication.plist
[failed] com.apple.coreservices.uiagent.plist
[failed] com.apple.gamed.plist
[failed] com.apple.iconservices.iconservicesagent.plist
[failed] com.apple.nsurlsessiond.plist
[failed] com.apple.pluginkit.pkd.plist
[failed] com.apple.printtool.agent.plist
[failed] com.apple.recentsd.plist
[failed] com.apple.sbd.plist
[failed] com.apple.scopedbookmarkagent.xpc.plist
[failed] com.apple.secd.plist
[failed] com.apple.security.cloudkeychainproxy.plist
[failed] com.apple.spindump_agent.plist
[failed] com.apple.syncdefaultsd.plist
[failed] com.apple.telephonyutilities.callservicesd.plist
[failed] com.apple.xpc.loginitemregisterd.plist
Problem System Launch Daemons: ℹ️
[failed] com.apple.AssetCacheLocatorService.plist
[failed] com.apple.awdd.plist
[failed] com.apple.cache_delete.plist
[failed] com.apple.coreservices.appleid.passwordcheck.plist
[failed] com.apple.coresymbolicationd.plist
[failed] com.apple.ctkd.plist
[failed] com.apple.diagnosticd.plist
[failed] com.apple.findmymac.plist
[failed] com.apple.GSSCred.plist
[failed] com.apple.icloud.findmydeviced.plist
[failed] com.apple.iconservices.iconservicesagent.plist
[failed] com.apple.iconservices.iconservicesd.plist
[failed] com.apple.ifdreader.plist
[failed] com.apple.MobileFileIntegrity.plist
[failed] com.apple.nehelper.plist
[failed] com.apple.nsurlsessiond.plist
[failed] com.apple.sandboxd.plist
[failed] com.apple.softwareupdate_download_service.plist
[failed] com.apple.spindump.plist
[failed] com.apple.systemstats.analysis.plist
[failed] com.apple.tccd.system.plist
[failed] com.apple.wdhelper.plist
[failed] com.apple.xpc.smd.plist
[failed] org.cups.cupsd.plist
Launch Daemons: ℹ️
[loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist Support
User Login Items: ℹ️
iTunesHelper Application (/Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunesHelper.app)
Messages Application (/Applications/Messages.app)
Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 15.0.0.223 - SDK 10.6 Support
Flash Player: Version: 15.0.0.223 - SDK 10.6 Support
QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
Default Browser: Version: 600 - SDK 10.10
Safari Extensions: ℹ️
Open in Internet Explorer
3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
Flash Player Support
Time Machine: ℹ️
Skip System Files: NO
Auto backup: YES
Volumes being backed up:
Storage: Disk size: 499.41 GB Disk used: 43.82 GB
OS: Disk size: 250.14 GB Disk used: 35.72 GB
Destinations:
Time Machine [Local]
Total size: 2.00 TB
Total number of backups: 6
Oldest backup: 2014-11-14 04:07:23 +0000
Last backup: 2014-11-14 12:50:29 +0000
Size of backup disk: Adequate
Backup size 2.00 TB > (Disk used 79.54 GB X 3)
Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
      23% prl_vm_app
      7% WindowServer
      4% Skype
      2% iTunes
      1% Spotlight
Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
3.68 GB prl_vm_app
172 MB prl_client_app
103 MB Skype
69 MB Finder
69 MB mds_stores
Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
45 MB Free RAM
1.11 GB Active RAM
1.01 GB Inactive RAM
30.57 GB Wired RAM
109.00 GB Page-ins
1.93 GB Page-outs

Mac Pro (2013) with Mavericks and Mac Office Excel

Using MAC Excel VBA, and obviously with my personally written Excel VBA application, I have discovered that
in a multi-Workbook Excel app, I am unable to "Open" additional Workbooks (xlsm-type) successfully
from any Workbook OTHER THAN with the very first Workbook opened in the app. In other words, if my app needs
2 or more Workbooks opened at any one time, only the 1st Workbook opened can "open" any other workbooks
successfully.
If the 2nd or any other Workbook in my app tries to execute an "open workbook" procedure of its own, no Err is thrown
and no indication is given that its "open Workbook" statement did not work, but the program/routine just continues as if
nothing was wrong. Additionally, all statements pertaining to the "not-opened" Workbook don't do a thing also
(i.e., .Clear, .ClearContents, .Range, .Copy, etc. don't work and don't throw errors).
On the other hand, when I restructure my Excel application such that the very first opened Workbook also "opens"
all the other Workbooks needed in my entire application, then my Excel application works great, even when I call
other subroutines that don't include "open workbook" statements but do include opject references and database
statements for whichever already-opened Workbook it needs. In this case also, all the final "close workbook"
statements must be properly placed in the first workbook's code and eventually executed at the end, and the entire
app works appropriately and successfully.
My question is, is it an Excel rule that ONLY the first workbook opened is allowed to open additional Workbooks, or
is this a MAC Excel limitation only, or is there a MAC Excel or VBA setting that solves this situation? I have done VBA
debug tracing in my app code to "prove" my point over and over here, and have found nothing that solves my delimma.
Maybe there's an additional workbook "open" parameter that might help, but I haven't discovered it yet. Note that
I am openinfg all my Workbooks with ReadOnly:= false
Note: I am using a Mac Pro (2013) 6-core, Mavericks, and Excel 11 VBA. Everything else on my entire system works great.
Thank you for any suggestions. I have used Windows Excel for many years very successfully and don't recall ever
encountering this situation with Workbooks before.

18. Can I connect a Mini DisplayPort monitor or monitor using a Mini DisplayPort adapter to a Thunderbolt port on my Thunderbolt-equipped Mac?
Yes. A Mini DisplayPort display or a display connecting with a Mini DisplayPort to VGA, DVI, or HDMI adapter will work just like it was connecting to a Mini DisplayPort connector when plugging in directly to the Thunderbolt connector on your Apple computer. Click here for more information on Mini DisplayPort connections and adapters.
19. How do I connect my Mini DisplayPort monitor or monitor using a Mini DisplayPort adapter to my Thunderbolt-equipped Mac when I have other Thunderbolt devices connected?
When connecting a Mini DisplayPort display or a display using a Mini DisplayPort adapter to a Thunderbolt peripheral (except as described in question 14), make sure the display is connected at the end of the Thunderbolt chain. You can use only one Mini DisplayPort device in the Thunderbolt chain.
Note: Systems with more than one Thunderbolt port, like an iMac, can have more than one Mini DisplayPort monitor or monitor connected with a Mini DisplayPort adapter connected as each Thunderbolt port can support one Mini DisplayPort display.

How do I speed up Lightroom on my new Mac Pro (2013)?

I have tried everything suggested in the forums like running imports in parallel, etc., and all my data is on the super fast built-in PCI-Express SSD of the Mac Pro. However, I have numerous speed problems with Lightroom 5.3 (latest version) when importing and working with photos.
Right now, here is what I am doing
* Performing three parallel imports for maximum speed as suggested in September, 2013 (to supposedly boost input from 25% CPU to 60% on a multi-core machine).
* Buildling 1:1 previews and all the other suggested official Lightroom Performance tips
And what I am getting:
* Between 11 to 15% CPU utilization, even when running imports and building previews in parallel.
* Data being read at only 2.5 to 6.5 MB per second.
* When I look at images even after the previews have been built, I see a sharp image for about 1/100th of a second, then it blurs for about 3/4 of a second, then it sharpens up again in about one second, as if Lightroom is redeveloping it again despite having a 1:1 preview fully built.
To my workflow, this is horrifically slow. I am tasked to go through about 5,300 sports photography images in an hour if possible, many taken at over 10 frames per second with a 1D X. To do this efficiently requires being able to INSTANTLY see the exact sharpness of a photograph, not being blurred for a full second, so that I can pick out the sharpest image from a burst of many images of each top play.
I love the features of being able to flag/unflag with P and U, star with 1-5, go full screen with F, zoom with Z, crop with R, etc., but the productivity potential that those fantastic keyboards shortcuts have is being utterly defeated by the fact that Lightroom is going SUPER slow even on this brand new 6-core Mac Pro. It literally is much slower than using Picasa or FastStone on a cheap Core i3 laptop with a regular HDD.
How can I configure Lightroom to use all six cores and more of the hard drive speed to speed up my workflow?
Obviously, Lightroom should be able to do much better if it were using more than 15% of the CPU and more than 1% of the SSD capability.
For me this is a SERIOUS problem and is preventing my new Mac Pro purchase from being any use to me. I am having to use other software right now to meet my production deadlines, and then go back through it later on Lightroom at a glacially slow pace. After a couple weeks of this duplicated workflow, I am just getting tired of it.

Maybe you could help us help you by providing your systen details in full the location of your files.
Thank you...

Bootcamp is different on two identical Mac Pro 2013 towers, Windows 7 vs 8

OK, so we bought two identical Mac Pro 2013 towers, took them out of the box and updated the system, and checked to see if could use Bootcamp. Hopefully to install Windows 7, but, failing that, Windows 8. We got two different results:
One of the machines says only Windows 8 can be installed, but the other has a dialog about Windows 7.
The only difference here is that I messed around with the partitions on the second one. I may have jumped the gun and called one partition "BOOTCAMP" before being advised not to do so and attempting to get rid of that partition. My partition attempts have led to that system dialog...
What's the reason these two are different? IS it possible to install Windows 7?

According to Boot Camp: System requirements for Microsoft Windows operating systems - Apple Support
Mac model
Windows 8
64-bit
Windows 7
64-bit
Windows 7
32-bit
Windows Vista
64-bit
Windows Vista
32-bit
Windows XP
32-bit
iMac (Retina 5K, 27-inch, Late 2014)
BCA
BCA
iMac (21.5-inch, Mid 2014)
BCA
BCA
iMac (27-inch, Late 2013)
5
5
iMac (21.5-inch, Late 2013)
5
5
W7 64-bit is supported, but W7 32-bit is not. Are you certain your W7 media is correct and complete? If the media has both 32-bit and 64-bit on it, it will be rejected.

Mac Pro 2013 internet (ethernet/wifi) lag on load

Hi,
Anyone has a lag with the new Mac Pro 2013 using Safari to surf the web, on WIFI and/or ethernet, when loading a page?
Meaning the blue bar on the link that loads after you hit enter.
The page lags to load for 2-5 sec before loading all at once.
I consulted Apple support, we tried all of this:
- plug directly in modem
- test on other devices the internet
- tried on Firefox
- loaded in safe mode
- loaded in recovery mode local
- loaded in recovery mode web
- reseted the following folders:
A) System library folder
Input method
Internet plugins
Scripting addition
Preferences/system configuration
B) User library folder
Preferences, com.apple.safari.plist
C) System preferences
System pref menu, startup item
Still not fixed.
Anyone has that issue?

Hi,
Thank you for the reply.
I do not see a difference with this, it lags regardless:
"When trying to access a website via its DNS name, such as www.apple.com, there may be a delay that ranges from several seconds up to several minutes before the page loads at normal speed, depending on the operating system version and configuration. However, if you access the website's numerical IP address, such as http://17.149.160.49, the page loads immediately."
Still directly plugged in modem, I see the DNS by default under NETWORK/ETHERNET/ADVANCED are the ones from the ISP.
I typed the 3 DNS manually, saved, rebooted. Still doing it.
Same problem with Google IPv4 and IPv6 public DNS.
I might remind you I do not have this issue on my iMac beside it which is under Snow Leopard.
All other devices are fast. Even download on the Mac Pro is fast.
Booting under Safe Mode, Recovery Mode (local and web) did not help. That means with a clean instance of Safari from a completely different partition.

Best Mac Pro (2013) configuration for photo editing/processing?

Hi all,
I couldn't find a reliable answer to this in my searching here or on google, hence I'm posting it here.
I'm going to buy and upgrade to the new mac pro when it's announced this month (Dec 2013). My primary use will be photo processing in photoshop.
Configuring it with 64gb RAM is the no-brainer part. And probably a 512gb or 1TB flash drive too.
The bit I'm unsure about is whether to opt for the 6 core processor option over the quad core? For photo editing (adding layers, filters, brushing in, multiple files open at times, running batch edits etc), does anyone have an opinion on whether the performance increase (if there is in fact any increase for photo work?) of the 6 core 3.5ghz would justify paying the extra AU$1300 difference over the quad core 3.7ghz option?
And from my earlier research paying the huge prices for 8 or 12 cores would simply be a waste for photo processing.
Thanks for the advice...

Mozzzaaa
I have the exact same requirements, here are my findings based on some observations from Activity Monitor and research based on how the hardware works.
Photoshop does not utilize multiple cores well for many standard editing ativities - therefore one core will be busy while the rest remain idle, however I have noticed over time that upgrades to Photoshop seem to take more advantage of multiple cores as Adobe updates the code. For example, appling filters utilize all of the cores while the filters are computing changes (smart sharpen for example). Try running CPU monitoring in Activity Monitor (double click the CPU graph to display all cores).
Lightroom utilizes all of the cores for Import, export and other activities that process multiple files. Being more modern code, it beter utilizes muti cores.
Keep in mind that each core handles two code threads, therefore a four core system is capable of processing 8 "streams" of code, the 6 core can manage 12 threads, etc.
Here is a screen shot of Mac Book Pro running PS CC Smart Sharpen:
All the new Mac Pro run at 3.9Hz Turbo Boost - they are all the same in that respect. This means that when the processers are not hot, at least one core will run at 3.9Hz - therefore on a relativly idle machine (just editing in PS for example) you would likley be running at 3.9Hz on all the Mac Pro 2013.
There are also the GPUs to consider. Apple as usual has not made enough information available to easly determine the cost benefits of the more powerful GPUs and I don't know if PS would utiliize the AMD GPUs well now, or perhaps better utilize them for the future. Perhaps someone could comment on that. Here is an interesting article: http://architosh.com/2013/10/the-mac-pro-so-whats-a-d300-d500-and-d700-anyway-we -have-answers/
Clearly the D500 that is standard with the 6 core seems a major bump over the 4 core D300 (therefore the costs of the 6 core reflect that). I don't know how much the D700 would cost - it would be helpful if this were published so I could consider my order.
There are two GPU in the new Mac Pros - but the purpose of the second one is not toally clear (thanks again to Apples's communication). It likley will be utilized for all sorts of things that don't really exist now and FCP X is scheduled for a new release better utilize the GPU for video (as nwaphoto mentioned video processing will be a major use of this equipment).
I was interested in your comment regarding 64 Meg ram. Yes that would be a hudge boost to PS performance, but would it be better to purchase from Apple or wait for OWC who offer RAM at major discounts over Apple. Once again, no info yet that I am aware of.
I believe the flash drive is upgradable but rumor has it that it uses a proprietary connecter. Makes me want to go with the largest size but once again OWC might be the way to go for an upgrade in a year or two.
In the past, the 6 core 2012 Mac Pro's were somewhat of a sweat spot in terms of horsepower vs cost. I will be considering that in my decession to upgrade. So I am considering a 6 core, will check out the Ram and Flash diIsk based on price - which is the infor I don't have. If you have anything please post
Thanks

Mac Pro 2013 fan speeds up to maximum after restart.

My brand new Mac Pro 2013, hanged on shutdown..
so I had to restart by using the button on the cylinder, when it restarted it sounded like a vacuum cleaner, the fan started to spin fast and didn't stop anymore and my mac was suddenly very slow :S.
After restarting the mac pro works fine again! this happened 2 times now...
Already called with apple they said that i should try and work with it and see if the problem comes back again.
Maybe any of you knows what could be wrong.??????
I'm mainly using the machine for Logic Pro X and sometimes for some video editing.
OS : Yosemite - 10.10.2
Mac Pro 6core 2013

Reset the SMC and PRAM
Intel-based Macs: Resetting the System Management Controller (SMC)
About NVRAM and PRAM

Where can i find a list of compatible ssd's for Apple Mac Pro 3.33GHz Six Core Mid 2012 Desktop/PC.

where can i find a list of compatible ssd's for Apple Mac Pro 3.33GHz Six Core Mid 2012 Desktop/PC?

http://www.storagereview.com/best_drives
http://www.storagereview.com/buying_an_ssd_the_top_10_brands_that_matter
Prices have crashed. Look and you can find Samsung 128's and others for $89 sometimes.
It is not just moving the OS and data apart, though it does matter, and more from you should never have the OS cluttered with data, been doing that for... 35 yrs. 0.01 ns vs 10 ms. 60k IO's per second. Reads in 220MB/sec but held back from making full use of SATA 6G.
OWC Mercury Aura Pro Express 6G SSD, the first and only third party SSD compatible with the new 2012 MacBook Air.
http://thessdreview.com/category/our-reviews/

CUDA NVIDIA video card to Mac Pro 2013

Is there any way to get the Mac Pro 2013 to run a CUDA enabled NVIDIA video card?

This graphic from ifixit.com shows the two special cards, still with heatsink paste in place, just after removal. The silver diamond surrounds the big graphics chip, just inside the RAMs on the card. Those RAMs contact heatsink pads on the central cooler. The whole business is secured with four screws beyond the RAMs, roughly centered on the sides of the diamond. So the Big GPU chip and the RAMs are pressed with heatsink paste and heatsink pads, respectively, against the central cooler. This is in lieu of allowance for a separate fan (which in many "standard" cards is what takes up the space of the second slot.
Power appears to be supplied by lugs in the outer corners of each card, so the cards are deliberately not interchangeable. One has connections that feed to the graphics outputs, the other has connections for the PCIe SSD socket.
The text says those connectors resemble the CPU daughter card connectors used in the late G4 and G5s.
https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Mac+Pro+Late+2013+Teardown/20778

Mac Pro 2013/14 UK Delivery

Has anyone in the UK recieved their new Mac Pro 2013/14 models yet?
Or does anyone have any RELIABLE information of when UK machines have/are being shipped?
I ordered my machine late on the day of release. Minor build to order with upgraded GFX cards and RAM.
Apple are being their usual arrogant, un-co-operative, non-communicative selves and refuse to give me any information on the delivery time of my machine.
Honestly you couldn't write this stuff - I literally get the Cupertino equivalent of "Computer says No." when I try and get ANY information at all.
I've never met a company so wilfully oblivious to the fact you are spending a huge amount of money with them, and so determined to deliver a terrible customer service experience despite that fact. If I weren't locked into the Apple eco system for work reasons I would tell them to take my order and shove it into one of those black bins they're selling
Anyway - I'm away travelling from the last week of Jan to the first week of Feb and obviously need to make arrangements if my machine is likely to arrive around then?
Any information at all on when/how Apple plan to ship UK machines would be much appreciated?
J

This is a User-to-User forum. We have no special Apple Insider information here.
Apple itself is providing the most reliable information available.
If you have no 'special insider information' then how do you know 'Apple itself is providing the most reliable information available.'
If Apple wanted to give me a rough delievry window that would be great - even a 7 day window would allow us customers to make suitable arrangements beforehand.
but no one else is doing any better.
I use many creative tech/software companies everyday - almost all offer better customer service than Apple (some not by much I'll grant you - but still better). None have the blatant arrogance and attitude of total disregard for the customer who is spending money with them that Apple do.
The tone of your reply implies that I'm being unreasonable in wishing to know ROUGHLY when a product I have spent several thousand pounds/dollars on, will be delivered to me.
And then having complete communications blackout from the company I ordered it from, despite the fact that the delivery date I was given has changed on the website (Does this affect me - who knows!?) - forcing me to chase them continually. To no avail.
J

I have a new Mac Pro. I want to use my old Mac Pro as a storage drive for photos and old documents, linked to my new Mac Pro. How do I set up the old computer?

I have a new Mac Pro. I want to use my old Mac Pro as a storage drive for photos and old documents, linked to my new Mac Pro. How do I set up the old computer? Both computers have OS X10.9.3. Currently they are connected by a Firewire 800 cable.

You certainly could keep the old Mac Pro in Firewire mode (hold down the T key on its keyboard as you boot) to show its drives on the new MP. This is basically as fast as putting the drives into a Firewire enclosure.
Or you could boot it normally and share its files over the network using the Sharing panel of System Preferences. If you turn on both File and Screen Sharing, you don't even need to have a monitor attached - you can do all administration using screen sharing. However, this method requires that you open all files over the network, which will be slower than the direct-connect method above, and may also not work with all applications.
Matt

Where can I buy the Mac Pro 2013 motherboard? Just the motherboard

So where can I buy JUST the Mac pro 2013 motherboard? If you can, please link it.
Thanks!

This is a User-to-User help site.
Helpers get their rewards by helping.
I know some good solutions to a lot of problems with Mac Pros. And other readers know a whole lot more solutions.
I do not know of any problem that can be solved by replacing these boards in a nearly-new Mac Pro. The processor board is sold as a bare board, with no processors or heatsinks. It takes an hour of trained technician time just to install the processors and heat sinks, and you MUST get the correct parts or it will not work. If your technique is not correct, the processor(s) will self destruct when you power them up.
The mainboard does not include the SATA connectors, which are actually on a wiring harness that is attached from behind.
What problem are you trying to solve here?

Do Mac Pro 2013 support six TV using HDMI/DVI?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for