Do you need quad-core for gaming?

Really attracted by the 13" retina MBP (although i've read many very mixed reviews). Was hoping someone could help me with a niggling concern with it; will the dual-core i5 be enough for running parallel Windows/OS, photoshop and gaming, all day, everyday?
By the time you upgrade the 256GB 13" to i7 you're into the 15" terratory which comes with quad-core i7 as standard. Just put off by the size...
Would really appreciate peoples thoughts on this.
Cheers

Will the dual-core i5 be able to handle parallel OS, photo editing and gaming or are we talking quad-core i7 realms to manage this comfortably?
Cheers

Similar Messages

  • Is mysql a free open source database or do you need a license for it in prd

    is mysql a free open source database or do you need a license for it in production.

    Hi,
    It should be free under GPL (General Public license).Usually it will comes with your operating system distribution (eg:RHEL)
    If you download it from Oracle site, it should have the commercial license tied to it, and you need to pay for that if it is in use for production.
    http://www.mysql.com/about/legal/licensing/index.html
    regards,
    mrak

  • What do you use if you need flash player for something?

    What do you use if you need flash player for something?

    There are some browsers in the app store that accommodate flash. Compatibility and effectiveness vary. Your best bet is to read the reviews and fnd something that works for you.

  • Do you need google chrome for new version of adobe reader

    Hi=
    Sorry about the previous question. I went into on-line banking to pay bills, and was advised that I needed to download the
    newest version of Adobe Reader, which I did. When I click on the payee I get a message saying to install the newest
    version of Adobe Reader. I guess my question is do you need Google Chrome for this to take effect. It worked before
    with just Google.Thanks to the answer from grafiti, guess I did not make my question clear.so here it is again
    WILL THE NEW VERSION ONLY WORK WITH GOOGLE CHROME.

    Pitbulls2 wrote:
    WILL THE NEW VERSION ONLY WORK WITH GOOGLE CHROME.
    In contrary; Google Chrome uses its own PDF viewer, not the Adobe Reader plugin.

  • Do you need virus protection for ipad minin?

    Do you need virus protection for your ipad mini ?

    In addition to that, jailbreak void your warranty, will prevent you from geting any support from Apple or these forums plus open your iPad to all kinds of malware.
    Allan

  • Dual core vs Quad core for a Filmmaker?

    Hi, I'm a 14 year-old filmmaker who really wants their next computer to be a mac mini. I am obviously on a tight budget being 14, so I was thinking just buying the standard dual-core processor. But for a filmmaker like myself, is it worth the extra $200 for my heavy-duty video-editing applications? I would use a mixture of Apple Motion 5, and the video-effects program Hitfilm Ultimate. I know quad is faster, but is it worth it for me?
    Thanks.

    "Hyperthreading" is the key. Hyper-threading enables each execution unit (or core, if you will) to process two threads (tasks) simultaneously.  It can do this because not every instruction takes only a single instruction cycle.  Sometimes instructions have to wait for a read from memory, which can take many clock cycles.  Sometimes multiple instructions can be performed at once -- for example, a floating point addition and an integer multiplication, as long as both instructions already have their operands in registers and store the results in different registers.  Hyper-threading enables each processor to handle multiple tasks by allowing one task to work while the other is waiting for a result, or allowing both instructions to be completed at the same time because they use non-conflicting resources.
    So, two "hyperthreaded" cores work as fast as four without hyperthreading, or the difference in speed is so negligible, you wouldn't notice it.  Since the Mac Mini Core i7 is also hyperthreaded, it works as well as dual quad cores, so if you need inudstry standard speed, then the Core i7 would be your best choice.
    As I said though, I can take 1080p video from my Canon Vixia, and edit it with OnLocation or Premiere Pro, and render it with barely a drain on my processor cores (2 or 4). So far, the biggest vid file I've done was about 250Mb, which was about a ten minute shoot. If you're going to work with 2Gb and up, then I'd definitely go with the Core i7 and max the RAM out to 16Gb.

  • Intel Quad Core for Premiere - is this a smart choice ?

    Hi everyone,
    I'm wondering if Intel's new Quad Core processor ( 2.4 Ghz ) will give a good boost to system performance over an older Intel 3.2 Ghz Ht chip.
    I have seen test results where a 1.6 ghz dual core Intel processor has lost in speed tests vs regular 3.2 ghz chips ( not dual core )
    So I'm puzzled,, will a Quad Core chip have any advantage when running Premiere ?
    I'm hoping there is a clear cut answer here, and I look forward to any responses.
    Thank you,
    Dave.

    Guys...
    Before you all go out and throw a party...
    My understanding is that with regards to CS3:
    1. 32bit XP normally supports up to 2gigs of ram. 4gigs if you modify a line in the bootstrap file. But 4gigs is divided into 3gigs for apps and 1gig for system stuff.
    2. 64bit XP is not supported.
    3. 64bit Vista is not supported yet.
    Here's the specs from Adobe:
    - Intel® Pentium® 4 (1.4GHz processor for DV; 3.4GHz processor for HDV), Intel Centrino®, Intel Xeon® (dual 2.8GHz processors for HD), or Intel Core Duo (or compatible) processor; SSE2-enabled processor required for AMD systems
    - Microsoft® Windows® XP Professional or Home Edition with Service Pack 2 or Windows Vista Home Premium, Business, Ultimate, or Enterprise (certified for 32-bit editions)
    - 1GB of RAM for DV; 2GB of RAM for HDV and HD; more RAM recommended when running multiple components
    Here's the memory specs for xp from Microsoft:
    Operating systems based on Microsoft Windows NT technologies have always provided applications with a flat 32-bit virtual address space that describes 4 gigabytes (GB) of virtual memory. The address space is usually split so that 2 GB of address space is directly accessible to the application and the other 2 GB is only accessible to the Windows executive software.
    The 32-bit versions of the Windows 2000 Advanced Server and Windows NT Server 4.0, Enterprise Edition, operating systems were the first versions of Windows to provide applications with a 3-GB flat virtual address space, with the kernel and executive components using only 1 GB. In response to customer requests, Microsoft has expanded the availability of this support to the 32-bit version of Windows XP Professional and all 32-bit versions of Windows Server 2003.
    Windows 2000 Memory Support. With Windows 2000 Professional and Server, the maximum amount of memory that can be supported is 4 GB (identical to Windows NT 4.0, as described later in this section). However, Windows 2000 Advanced Server supports 8 GB of physical RAM and Windows 2000 Datacenter Server supports 32 GB of physical RAM using the PAE feature of the IA-32 processor family, beginning with Intel Pentium Pro and later.
    Windows XP Professional and Windows Server 2003 Memory Support. The maximum amount of memory that can be supported on Windows XP Professional and Windows Server 2003 is also 4 GB. However, Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition supports 32 GB of physical RAM and Windows Server 2003, Datacenter Edition supports 64 GB of physical RAM using the PAE feature.
    The virtual address space of processes and applications is still limited to 2 GB unless the /3GB switch is used in the Boot.ini file. When the physical RAM in the system exceeds 16 GB and the /3GB switch is used, the operating system will ignore the additional RAM until the /3GB switch is removed. This is because of the increased size of the kernel required to support more Page Table Entries. The assumption is made that the administrator would rather not lose the /3GB functionality silently and automatically; therefore, this requires the administrator to explicitly change this setting.
    The /3GB switch allocates 3 GB of virtual address space to an application that uses IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWARE in the process header. This switch allows applications to address 1 GB of additional virtual address space above 2 GB.
    The virtual address space of processes and applications is still limited to 2 GB, unless the /3GB switch is used in the Boot.ini file. The following example shows how to add the /3GB parameter in the Boot.ini file to enable application memory tuning:
    However, knock yourselves out on getting the biggest baddest processors out there.
    regards,

  • Dual-core or Quad-core for Premiere, After Effects, and Photoshop CS4?

    We are planning to purchase around 25 computers for a computer lab for working with CS4 Production Premium at the high school level.  Mainly Premiere Pro, After Effects, and Photoshop.  Our budget is, unfortunately, a mere $550-$625 per machine (just the tower though, we have monitors).  I've already established that a 64-bit operating system makes a significant difference in the performance, even though Photoshop is the only 64-bit application, and I'm now hung up on whether or not it's worth the cost of a quad-core processor over a dual-core.
    I'm discovering the different hardware needs for each application, so I'm trying to find an economic balance that will give me the best performance per buck.  It seems that Premiere benefits significantly from more cores (we're editing 1440x1080 AVCHD), and this article over at Tom's Hardware has convinced me that I don't want to compromise with a hyperthreaded dual-core for After Effects.
    I'm also struggling with what part the graphics card plays in the mix.  Which applications lean on the graphics card, and will it make much difference as long as I meet the requirements (OpenGL 2.0, Shader Model 3.0, Direct3D 10, and 256 Mb Ram)?
    I understand I will need to settle for less-than-awesome with my budget, but I'm already making sacrifices to get the number to $625.  I would like to make sure that those sacrifices will be worth it for a quad-core system.

    I think I may have answered my own question by looking at these charts over at Tom's Hardware:
    http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2009-desktop-cpu-charts-update-1/Adobe-Premiere-Pro-CS4 ,1404.html
    http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2009-desktop-cpu-charts-update-1/Adobe-Photoshop-CS-4,1 387.html
    http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/desktop-cpu-charts-2010/Video-Editing-Adobe-After-Effec ts-CS5,2427.html
    I  think that the jump to the quad core in Premiere Pro is worth it, even if I  don't see as large of an improvement in Photoshop or After Effects.  I am still interested in the role of the graphics card in the mix if anyone can shed some light on that.  Will an integrated graphics card (like an Intel GMA x4500 or Radeon HD4200) suffice or will I need an actual graphics card to realize the benefits?
    Thanks

  • What to get: 3.7GHz quad-core or 3.5GHz 6-quad-core for the Mac Pro 6,1?

    I'm thinking of getting the new Mac Pro 6,1. I want to keep the price down as much as I can. I work in, FCPX 10.1, Motion 5, Premiere Pro CC, After Effects CC, Speedgrade CC and DaVinci Resolve 11 lite? Sufficient to say I do a lot of rendering. I do not work with any 4K footage, just 1080P. So does anybody have any thoughts or experience with the MP 6,1 and do you think the 3.7GHz quad-core has enough power?
    Thanks,
    -Russ

    There are two ways to get the 6-core:
    One is to start with the entry for the 4-core (includes D300 graphics) and customize to 6-core processor only, adds US$500.
    The other is to start with the 6-core (includes D500 graphics) and starts at US$1000 more.
    If you buy the 4-core today, the processor can be third-party or do-it-yourself upgraded with an off-the-shelf processor later.
    I expect others would advise you to buy as much graphics power as you can afford, but I think it has a smaller and diminishing return.

  • 8-Core vs Quad-Core for Adobe After Effects

    With AfterEffects running native on Intel, how much difference will it make to run AE on an 8-core MacPro vs the Quad-core?
    Thanks!

    Without specifically knowing AE, it's behaviours and requirements, it's hard to say. However, generally speaking the ability to saturate 8 cores is dependent on two things…
    1) Mac OS X. The performance of Mac OS X and its handling of multi-threaded applications is all important. While Tiger does a decent job of this you'll find that Leopard will put it to shame in this regard. If you actually monitor your core saturation during processing you'll notice that many application, which includes the like of iTunes etc, won't simultaneously saturate all cores. What they'll actually do is saturate one core at a time sequentially. Funnily I find that multi-threaded PowerPC applications/Rosetta saturates all cores very well.
    2) Data source and destination. Where your data is coming from and going to, obviously with CPU processing in between, is a hugge consideration. For instance, if data must come and go from hard disk you might well find that this will be you bottleneck. This also goes for RAM. How much data must come and go from the processors is all important as this will result, or not, in the processor cores waiting for data or not. If they're waiting they won't saturate.
    Obviously there are things you can do in this regard to minimise your data bottlenecks such as using RAID and optimal RAM installations (I'd recommend anyone going with 8 cores go with a minimum 8GB - 4 x 2GB in Slots 1/2 - RAM)
    Ultimately, unless you know how efficient AE is in the multi-threaded and its data handling stakes you might well find a huge benefit by going with 8 cores. On the other hand, you could also be wasting your money. My advise would be to call Adobe and ask them. Additionally, find someone with AE and a quad-core MP and watch the core saturation for yourself. I'd use MenuMeters…
    http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/17713
    … set to update as fast as possible for this to see what's going on.
    I get the feeling the biggest benefit, as others have noted, will be more efficient multiple application processing/multi-tasking rather than single application processing. Until it gets into oswers hands it's hard to really say for certain.

  • Quad Core for my PC

    Hi I have a HP Compaq dc 7900CMT PC I am wondering is there a quad core processor that I can get to fit this  computer Thanking you Simon 
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Hi, Simon:
    Below is the link to the quickspecs for your PC.
    Supported processors are listed on pages 9 and 10.
    http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/13029_ca/13029_ca.PDF

  • Do you need antivirus software for Macs?

    Hi there,
    I purchased a new iMac yesterday, and I was wondering if I need antivirus software for it?  Thanks!

    There are two trains of thought here. Ultimately you'll need to decide which one fits you and your usage.
    In general, there are no true viruses on Mac OS X - that is, no software that can just infect your machine and self-replicate without any user involvement.
    However, that's not to say that malware doesn't exist. There are several known trojans on Mac OS X - software that's advertised to do one thing but actually doesn't something else (generally malicious) behind the scenes. These applications typically use some social-engineering or other guise to fool you into thinking they're legitimate - for example, you might visit a web site that pops up a message saying you need a certain software update in order to access the site, along with a link to 'conveniently' install that software, only to find it's installing something completely different.
    The difference here is that trojan applications like this require some kind of user input and usually require you to authenticate your username and password in order to install. If you only install trusted software and are smart about knowing when you should/should not need to enter your password then you're pretty immune from such tricks. If there are multiple users on the machine (especially if they all have admin access), this problem becomes compounded since it only takes one person to let down their guard.
    Then, there's the third class of malware in which your machine becomes a vehicle for viruses, even if you're not affected yourself. A classic example here is email and/or distributing software that gets opened on othe platforms. For example, if you recieve a document that's infected with a Windows virus, it can and will do nothing on your machine. However, if you then forward that document to other users, they may open it thinking it's trusted (it came from someone they know), only to find it infects their machine.
    This kind of problem is more prevalent in mixed-platform corporate environments, and is exascerbated when you consider that things like Microsoft Word documents and PDF files have been carriers of this kind of malware in the past.
    A good anti-virus application would detect and identify these kinds of malware, even though they cannot affect your machine itself.
    So, do you need anti-virus? Probably not if you're careful and don't share much content with other users (especially other users on other platforms). However, there's generally little downside to doing so.

  • Dual core vs Quad Core for mild video and photo editing

    I've owned PC's since ever and I'm now contemplating on coming over to the Mac world, my question is would a fully upgraded 13" MBPr Suffice for mild photo and video editing or should I try to shell out the extra cash for a lower end 15" with Quad-Core?
    13" specs
    2.8GHz Dual-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.3GHz
    16GB 1600MHz DDR3L SDRAM
    512GB PCIe-based Flash Storage
    2199$
    15" specs
    2.3GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.5GHz
    16GB 1600MHz DDR3L SDRAM
    512GB PCIe-based Flash Storage
    2599$

    Sorry, yes it will suffice? if so how many years would I expect this computer to last me? (Sorry I'm really new to apple)

  • Do you need antivirus protection for iPad2?

    Do you need to get antivirus protection for iPad2?

    Dadof2Girls wrote:
    Exactly what the other two said... but I added this face.
    And you put one on my face with that dad!!

  • Do you need an app for icloud

    Do you have to pay for icloud ? Do you have to use an app for it ?

    No and no. ICloud is part of iOS 5 and is already on your phone if you are running that operating system. ICloud interacts with several apps on your phone including contacts, calendars, and mail. You can see what it is doing by going to Settings > iCloud.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Please help me in creating a form using Swing.

    (I m sorry if I've posted similar post in some other thread.I am new to this forum..:)) There are several problems which I am facing while coding a form. 1. In the form I have one JComboBox of Country and other of State. Now I want it in such a way t

  • Export from iMovie to stand-alone DVD hard drive

    I want to preserve camcorder home movies edited in iMovie. The DVD recorded from iDVD won't play on my existing DVD player. Could I use the hard drive of a stand-alone DVD recorder/player to import from iMovie? I don't currently own one. iMacG5   Mac

  • When I am using HBOGO, I only get audio out of the AppleTV and no video??

    HboGo on the iPad only runs audio through the Apple TV? how do you get the video to show?

  • Error creating a mailbox

    I am trying to manually create a mailbox for an existing AD account.  After going through the steps in EMC, the mailbox creation fails with "Error: The address 'smtp:@xyzcorp.com' is invalid  The address '@xyzcorp.com' is not a valid SMTP address." 

  • Issues with Lightning on Thunderbird

    Hi to everyone: I have installed Thunderbird + Lightning: [habarrera@itilmanpc ~]$ pacman -Qs thunderbird local/lightning 0.9-3 An integrated calendar extension for Mozilla Thunderbird local/thunderbird 2.0.0.23-1 Standalone Mail/News reader local/th