Document certification becoming INVALID after Ctrl+F in Acrobat 9. Possible bug?

Hi
Am using document certifcation to protect my application Pdfs. Have came across an issue where in the document certification is getting invalid. AM also able to reproduce the error by working with pdfs outside my application. Below are the steps
1. Create a Pdf with 1 text field. Put some default value in the field e.g. Testing
2. Certify the document using File->Save As Certified Document
3. Close and Re-open the document. There is a document message bar on top with text "This document is certified......"
4. Press Ctrl+F and search for the value in the text field (say Test). The searched text is highlighted & selected.
5. Go to Advanced->Sign & Certify->Validate All Signatures.
6. The Certifying signature becomes crossed out and the message bar changes to "Certification is invalid"
Has someone come across this issue or Any idea why this is happening?

Hi Steve,
Am unable to reproduce with the file attached by you.
I also tested further to analyze that the signature break is happening with all the files only for the 1st time you execute the find function i.e.
1. Perform all the 6 steps as mentioned in my 1st post in this thread dated 6 Dec 2010.
2. Close and Re-open the same pdf.
3. Execute the find function by using Ctrl+F to find any text in the pdf.
4. Validate the signatures, Certifying signature is not lost/broken
Start with a new file again and certifying signature will be broken only after 1st find and not afterwards.
Maybe this'll help in pinpointing the problem.
Thanks
Atin

Similar Messages

MATERIALIZED VIEW BECOMES INVALID AFTER REFRESH

Hello All,
I have wierd problem ,
In my enviroinment we have a MATERIALIZED VIEW ,which is refreshed by a sheduled DBMS_SNAPSHOT.REFRESH Job post the refresh it becomes invalid and every time we have to compile it manually ,Could anybody help with a solution .Thanks a lot in Advance .
DETAILS :
======
VERSION:Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.6.0 - 64bit Production
HOST: IBM AIX

Is the MV part of a refresh group?
Post the command and parameters used by the scheduled job to do the refresh as well as the parameters you use when you do it manually.

Document SIgnature Status becomes invalid after resigning

Hi all,
I have a form with two Document Signature.
When i clear and resign one of the Document Signature it status is invalid.
Please suggest me a solution.
Regards,
S.V.Satish Kumar

I tested the form you posted. Here is what I found, but I am not completely clear on what all your script is supposed to be doing.
Steps
1) I filled in the first "comment line"
2) I signed the first signature field
3) Results: The signature was valid, the document status (see screen shot 1signature_docstatus.gif) reported the signature was valid. The signature staus was valid as displayed in the signature panel (see screen shot 1signature_detail.gif)
4) I added and filled in a second "comment line"
5) I signed the second signature field
6) Results: The first signature was valid, the second signature was valid, and the document status repored that ther were "unsigned changes" since the last signature was applied (see screen shot 2signature_docstatus.gif) The signature statuses were valid with subsequent changes made to the document as displayed in the signature panel (see screen shot 2signature_detail.gif)
Don't confuse the "exclamation" mark icon with "Invalid", it is only a warning to inform you that changes have been made that are not "digitally signed", I suspect your some part of your script is causing this. If you want to have Acrobat\Reader display a green check mark icon, then you cannot make any changes to the document after the final signature has been applied.
If you haven't done so, take a look at the sample I posted on your duplicate post in this forum ( http://forums.adobe.com/thread/492773?tstart=0 ).
If a signature is "invalid" it will display a red "X" icon.
Regards
Steve

Leopard Server License Key suddenly becomes invalid after update to 10.5.8

After doing the update to 10.5.8, when I go into Server Admin, it says my License Key is a duplicate and locks me out of all services and only allows ten clients to connect. I tried switching the license to another, and the same thing happens. And both keys work perfectly fine on a different server. Any suggestions as to what may be going on?

Here is a copy of what keeps appearing in the Server Admin log file if that helps at all:
Aug 11 12:17:02 spub /usr/sbin/serialnumberd[146]: MulticastListener(): conflicting serial number from 129.130.29.128
Aug 11 12:17:06 spub servermgrd[55]: servermgr_info: [55] SNCheck() failed with 1 (spub.ksu.edu: )
Aug 11 12:17:06 spub [0x0-0x36036].com.apple.ServerAdmin[5939]: * ERROR: -[GRAxes computeLayout]:1124 - plotRect height = 0.000000 <= 0.0 *
Aug 11 12:17:06 spub [0x0-0x36036].com.apple.ServerAdmin[5939]: * ERROR: -[GRChartView computeLayout]:1194 - Layout for overlay axes (0xab1c290) failed. *
Aug 11 12:17:06 spub [0x0-0x36036].com.apple.ServerAdmin[5939]: * ERROR: -[GRAxes computeLayout]:1124 - plotRect height = 0.000000 <= 0.0 *
Aug 11 12:17:06 spub [0x0-0x36036].com.apple.ServerAdmin[5939]: * ERROR: -[GRChartView computeLayout]:1194 - Layout for overlay axes (0xab2b6a0) failed. *
Aug 11 12:17:34 spub postfix/smtpd[5641]: warning: 125.160.151.41: hostname 41.subnet125-160-151.speedy.telkom.net.id verification failed: nodename nor servname provided, or not known
Aug 11 12:17:51 spub postfix/smtpd[5641]: warning: 189.135.192.35: hostname dsl-189-135-192-35-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx verification failed: nodename nor servname provided, or not known
Aug 11 12:18:02 spub /usr/sbin/serialnumberd[146]: Conflict found for tag xsvr: local (pid = 55, extra= ); remote (host = spub.ksu.edu, extra = )
Aug 11 12:18:02 spub /usr/sbin/serialnumberd[146]: MulticastListener(): conflicting serial number from 129.130.29.128
Aug 11 12:19:00 spub postfix/smtpd[6166]: warning: 189.169.250.244: hostname dsl-189-169-250-244-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx verification failed: nodename nor servname provided, or not known
Aug 11 12:19:00 spub imap[6167]: TLS server engine: cannot load CA data
Aug 11 12:19:00 spub imap[6167]: TLS server engine: No CA file specified. Client side certs may not work
Aug 11 12:19:00 spub imap[6167]: STARTTLS negotiation failed: 213.spub.ksu.edu [129.130.29.213]
Aug 11 12:19:02: --- last message repeated 3 times ---
Aug 11 12:19:02 spub /usr/sbin/serialnumberd[146]: Conflict found for tag xsvr: local (pid = 55, extra= ); remote (host = spub.ksu.edu, extra = )
Aug 11 12:19:02 spub /usr/sbin/serialnumberd[146]: MulticastListener(): conflicting serial number from 129.130.29.128

Signature is invalid after signing and saving

Hi,
I've been messing around with this problem for days and I don't find a solution.
I've a PDF document I created in LiveCycle Designer ES 8.2. This document will get populated with data from an XFDF file. After that, user can input data and data will be retrieved via Webservices too.
After finishing, the user has to sign the document and then it will be saved back to the server with a submit function.
When I reopen the signed document (or even after I click "save" without sending back to the server and reopening it), the signature is invalid. When I click on "Compare signed version to current version", I get the report "The pages are identical" and when I close the report, the signature isn't invalid anymore. Acrobat then writes: "At least one signature requires validating".
There are some JavaScript functions in the document which may cause the problem, but I already eliminated most of them, with docReady events, so they won't be executed on start.
Is there a way to debug the PDF document?
I've found some debugging hint on the internet from 2003 or 2004, but I can't even find the menus right now, so I think, there must be a new way for this in Acrobat 9.
I hope, someone can help me, this problem really drives me crazy.
Thanks.
Fritz

Hi Fritz,
In the interest of full disclosure, I got the answer to the problem from one of my distinguished colleagues, I'm just the messenger in this case.
The problem is that the form adds some items to the Arzneispezialität / Zusatztext combobox which are there during signing but the form doesn’t remember that it did this on the next form open.
Since this field is included in the MDP+ signature and the field has changed in the re-opened version vs. the signed version, the MDP+ signature becomes invalid.
XFA has a feature that remembers these kinds of things for you but it is turned it OFF. Please open the attached screen shot to see the control in question.
So, you can either (1) turn this feature ON (Automatically), or (2) write some script to clear the combobox items prior to signing or (3) write some script to repopulate the combobox items on the subsequent open to match the items that were there during signing.
Steve

When do VI and queue references become invalid?

Hi all,
I have a fairly complicated problem, so please bear with me.
1) I have a reentrant SubVI (let's call it VI "Assign") that has an input cluster of (VI ref, queue ref) (let's call the cluster type "Refs"). If the VI ref is invalid (first execution), the VI ref and queue ref are assigned values and are passed on as an output cluster of same type. (The VI does other things too, but for simplicity only this is important.)
2) The VI that calls VI "Assign" (let's call it VI "Store") is not reentrant and has a local variable of type "Refs" that is wired to the input and output of VI "Assign". This VI effectively stores the references. The references returned by VI "Assign" are always valid right after the call, but after the problem condition described below, they are invalid at the start of all calls before they are passed to VI "Assign".
3) VI "Store" is called by multiple non-reentrant VIs, so the local variables of VI "Assign" retain their values (Has been tested and verified to retain their values). The VI causing the problem in this case is a template VI of which multiple copies are launched (let's call it VI "Template").
The problem is that the moment an instance of VI "Template" is closed, the queue reference becomes invalid, although the actual variant value of the reference remains the same. The VI ref can become invalid or not, depending on small changes, but is always reproducible. I assume there must be some similarity between VI and queue refs. After spending some time researching, the Labview help states for the Open VI Ref component "If you do not close this reference, it closes automatically after the top-level VI associated with this function executes." In this case I assumed it means that the moment the reentrant VI "Assign" finishes, the references will get cleared ?? So I made a non-reentrant VI (let's call it VI "NR Assign") that only assigns values to the references and VI "Assign" now calls this VI (It effectively does what I described VI "Assign" does). I keep this VI alive by using it in a VI which never terminates and since it never terminates, the references should never become invalid. Anyone still following? This didn't solve the problem though. If I reproduce the same scenario using only one instance of the template VI, it works just fine. Furthermore, the VI and queue references are never closed, to aid analysis of the problem. Can anyone shine some light on what happens when a template VI terminates? Could this be the problem?
Unfortunately I cannot include the code.
Thank you whoever is able to make sense of this.
Christie

Christie wrote:
Hi all,
I have a fairly complicated problem, so please bear with me.
1) I have a reentrant SubVI (let's call it VI "Assign") that has an input cluster of (VI ref, queue ref) (let's call the cluster type "Refs"). If the VI ref is invalid (first execution), the VI ref and queue ref are assigned values and are passed on as an output cluster of same type. (The VI does other things too, but for simplicity only this is important.)
2) The VI that calls VI "Assign" (let's call it VI "Store") is not reentrant and has a local variable of type "Refs" that is wired to the input and output of VI "Assign". This VI effectively stores the references. The references returned by VI "Assign" are always valid right after the call, but after the problem condition described below, they are invalid at the start of all calls before they are passed to VI "Assign".
3) VI "Store" is called by multiple non-reentrant VIs, so the local variables of VI "Assign" retain their values (Has been tested and verified to retain their values). The VI causing the problem in this case is a template VI of which multiple copies are launched (let's call it VI "Template").
The problem is that the moment an instance of VI "Template" is closed, the queue reference becomes invalid, although the actual variant value of the reference remains the same. The VI ref can become invalid or not, depending on small changes, but is always reproducible. I assume there must be some similarity between VI and queue refs. After spending some time researching, the Labview help states for the Open VI Ref component "If you do not close this reference, it closes automatically after the top-level VI associated with this function executes." In this case I assumed it means that the moment the reentrant VI "Assign" finishes, the references will get cleared ?? So I made a non-reentrant VI (let's call it VI "NR Assign") that only assigns values to the references and VI "Assign" now calls this VI (It effectively does what I described VI "Assign" does). I keep this VI alive by using it in a VI which never terminates and since it never terminates, the references should never become invalid. Anyone still following? This didn't solve the problem though. If I reproduce the same scenario using only one instance of the template VI, it works just fine. Furthermore, the VI and queue references are never closed, to aid analysis of the problem. Can anyone shine some light on what happens when a template VI terminates? Could this be the problem?
Unfortunately I cannot include the code.
Thank you whoever is able to make sense of this.
Christie
All LabVIEW refnums do get deallocated automatically when the top-level VI in whose hierarchy the refnum was created goes idle (stops executing). You will have to make sure that the creation of a refnum is done inside a VI hierarchy that stays running for the entire time you want to use that refnum.
Rolf Kalbermatter
Message Edited by rolfk on 06-27-2007 11:52 AM
Rolf Kalbermatter
CIT Engineering Netherlands
a division of Test & Measurement Solutions

I just installed latest updates and now itunes becomes unresponsive after 10-15 minutes

The latest OSX update (Security Update 2013-003) perhaps is breaking itunes. It becomes unresponsive after 10-15 minutes and I have to force quit it each time.

with that one, let's try the following procedure.
first, head into your Add/Remove programs and uninstall your QuickTime. if it goes, good. if it doesn't, we'll just attend to it when we attend to itunes.
next, download and install the Windows Installer CleanUp utility. use it to clear any existing itunes and/or QuickTime installation configuration information from the PC.
Description of the Windows Installer CleanUp Utility
next, use the the following document as a guide for manual removal of leftover itunes and quicktime program files:
Removing iTunes and QuickTime for Windows
now try another itunes install. does it go through properly this time?

PL/SQL Functions becoming 'invalid'

We have created a set of functions which are used by
applications and triggers within our system. Everything ran over
the weekend and all triggers were operating and functions were
performing as expected. Yesterday the it was noticed that one of
the functions had become 'Invalid' which stopped the processing
of the system. The function is invoked by a trigger on insert
into a table.
Does anyone know what would cause a function to go 'Invalid'
like this?
Thanks
Jeff M.

Hi,
If you alter or modify the objects(DDL Operations), then the
procedures, functions, views..etc will be invalid. And also it
applies recursively,i.e,if these procedures and functions are
referred in some other procedure and functions, they also will
become invalid. So before applying a DDL operation on any object
better find the it's references from DBA_dependencies and
recompile them after the DDL operation.
Regards,
G. Rajakumar.

ASN Reference document number is invalid error with SA

Hi~
We have ASN creation error with SA(Scheduling Agreement).
Portal Menu : Delivery-Receipts and Requirements-Due List for purchasing document(Supplier)
1. Select SA(Scheduling Agreement) line
2. Click 'Create ASN '
3. After enter ship from location, ASN number, Error occur
"ASN ASN-1112, item 000001: Reference document number is invalid "
When we execute with PO, there are no error.
But with SA, there are always error.
Bestregards,
SKY

Hi SKY
Please make sure the external procurement releationship (SA) exists in the below transaction
/n/sapapo/pwbsrc1 between source and destination locations. i.e shipfrom and ship to
Also make sure that the external procurement relation ship is referenced in the transportation lane /n/sapapo/tl1
Select your product -specific transportation lane- go to detail screen
There you can find external procurement releationship, maintain the data
Please enhance your master data acoringly. Afterwards you can select reference doc nomber as well as item number with the value help in the ASN creation screen. By that the reported error msg should not appear anymore.
Or Switch off PURCH_REF_MANDATORY validation check
i suggest you follow first method and complete the master data setup
Best Regards
Vinod

R-Tree Index becomes invalid

Hi,
I've a index that becomes invalid almost every day. I get the error message
ORA-29902: error in executing ODCIIndexStart() routine
ORA-13203: failed to read USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA view
ORA-13203: failed to read USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA view
ORA-29400: data cartridge error
ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_INDEX_METHOD_10I", line 286
after rebuilding the index everything works fine again.
Does anybody know a solution on that problem?
Peter

Is there a nightly process that is causing things to change? I think we need more info to be able to help you.
Is it possible that this index is in a different tablespace and backups aren't shutting them down/bringing them back up in the right order?
Any manner of things could cause this, beyond the Oracle bug for spatial indexes in 10G, with large number of records. Ours handle this fine night after night, so something must be causing your data to change or affecting the index.
What happens every night, or at the end of the day that could be affecting it?

Object Fields Mysteriously Becoming Invalid

I am not exactly sure what code to post with this considering the nature of what's going on, so I'll do my best to explain and then perhaps I can provide code based on your responses.
When my application loads in the AppDelegate I create 3 objects of the "Item" type and then create an array out of those objects and add that array to an ItemListController which has a property for an NSMutableArray. The program then loads a UINavigationController with each of those objects in it being drawn with a subClass of UITableViewCell. As it stands now, if I click on any one of those objects more than 3 times, the object itself does not become nil, but all of the fields within it do.
- (void)applicationDidFinishLaunching:(UIApplication *)application {
Item *sword = [[Item alloc] initWithName:@"Sword" description:@"This is a sword"];
//sword.itemPrice = (int *)524;
Item *shield = [[Item alloc] initWithName:@"Shield" description:@"This is a shield"];
//shield.itemPrice = (int *)322;
Item *subligar = [[Item alloc] initWithName:@"Subligar" description:@"This is a subligar"];
//subligar.itemPrice = (int *)1034;
[subligar setImageWithPath:@"Hello.png"];
if(self.itemListController == nil) {
ItemListController *controller = [[ItemListController alloc] init];
self.itemListController = controller;
[controller release];
NSMutableArray *itemArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithObjects:sword, shield, subligar, nil];
self.itemListController.items = itemArray;
[itemArray release];
// Configure and show the window
[window addSubview:[navigationController view]];
[window makeKeyAndVisible];
The click handler of my TableView right now simply calls the AppDelegate's instance of ItemListController and then gets the object back from the items array at the index at which the user clicked. From there, I set a few properties and load a view tailored to that Item.
Presently, all of the logic that sets properties with the Item and loads the view for that object is commented out and so the only behavior occurring is the Item being retrieved from the AppDelegate's ItemListController.items and then being stored in a temporary object which is later released. But like I said above, *after 3 requests for my object all of its fields become invalid*. I have no idea what is causing it because the object itself is never being released within that time. Below is the code from the click event of the table cell:
- (void)tableView:(UITableView *)tableView didSelectRowAtIndexPath:(NSIndexPath *)indexPath {
calls++;
NSLog(@"Hit Count: %d", calls);
iPhoneHelloWorldAppDelegate *appDelegate = (iPhoneHelloWorldAppDelegate *)[[UIApplication sharedApplication] delegate];
Item *item = (Item *)[appDelegate.itemListController.items objectAtIndex:indexPath.row];
//lastItem = item;
if(self.itemView == nil) {
ItemViewController *viewController = [[ItemViewController alloc] initWithNibName:@"ItemViewController" bundle:[NSBundle mainBundle]];
self.itemView = viewController;
[viewController release];
if(calls > 3) {
NSLog(@"item retainCount = %d", [item retainCount]);
[item release];
Here's a snapshot from the debugger after my Item object dies:
http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/4567/picture2az5.png

Hi,
Item *item = (Item *)[appDelegate.itemListController.items objectAtIndex:indexPath.row];
//lastItem = item;
if(self.itemView == nil) {
ItemViewController *viewController = [[ItemViewController alloc] initWithNibName:@"ItemViewController" bundle:[NSBundle mainBundle]];
self.itemView = viewController;
[viewController release];
if(calls > 3) {
NSLog(@"item retainCount = %d", [item retainCount]);
// Why do you relase item? I don't see any retain or method wich increases the retain-count.
[item release];

Problem: Objects become invalid so easily

Hi All,
We are running Oracle 9i Standard Edition, which was downgraded from the Enterprise Edition, because they want to save $50K/year.
I have noticed even in the enterprise edition that some objects (sprocs, functions, triggers, packages) could become invalid for no reason (no schema changes and no changes in some sprocs/functions called by some others). I have googled this problem and found a few tips on the the internet and at least one seasoned DBA said Oracle objects can become invalid for no obvious reasons. After the downgrade, things got worse. The DBA runs a script to compile all packages, sprocs, functions, triggers once every hour. Then things got even worse. But I think the DBA script did not run more than once in a row to resolve some dependency issues. So now the DBA runs his script every two minutes. The problem is gone, but is there any better way to do this? Or should it happen in the first place? I figure that if Oracle runs like this, it should be out of business soon, because the MS SQL guys say they never have to explicitly re-compile invalid obejcts. At first the DBA thought that when PowerBuilder calls the sprocs, the sprocs do not re-compile because Sybase does not know how to program against Oracle. Then one day I was using SQL*Plus to run the sprocs and got the explicit error message for invalid objects and then the DBA was convinced otherwise.
Thanks.
Ben

Thanks a lot. Yes you are right. The re-complie did cause other objects to be invalid. that's why I asked to dba to run his script more than once in a row. Now the problem seems to be gone. But here is what I found at http://www.dbazine.com/oracle/or-articles/hordila2. It is true when a package or sproc becomes invalid, they often times do not auto re-compile. See his comments on that.
Application Malfunctions and Data InconsistenciesPart of maintaining quick response times for the database is making sure that as many objects as possible have a valid status. At least frequently used objects should not be invalid. Some objects (views, triggers, procedures, functions, packages, package bodies) can become invalid under certain circumstances: after massive data loads, imports, batches, even without explicit schema changes, after schema restructuring (drop, re-name, alter of objects). Very often, developers leave behind on purpose lots of invalid objects, to serve as a library of source code for future needs, or as a source code backup for the production objects. Some of these events are thought of as normal, or maybe bad style, while others are treated as bugs.
Anyway, if this happens, applications may stop working at all or may start working slower, incorrectly or incompletely. Mal-functioning triggers calling invalid procedures, etc., for example, can lead to data inconsistencies, missed data propagation, etc. In a complex system, this is a serious situation and may go undetected for some length of time.
Failed RecompilingFor some objects (views, triggers), the Oracle system may attempt automatically to recompile and validate them at the first run. This will slow the first runs of the application, but the system will function correctly, and be faster on the next runs. For stored programs, most of the time, this auto-recompile does not happen. The DBA needs to detect and recompile them as soon as possible.
Some objects need to be re-developed/edited for references to be successfully recompiled and to become valid again. And other objects may
Ben

Package Invalid after Upgrade

Hi All,
I have recently upgraded one of my databases to Oracle 10.2.0.3 after which one of the package has become invalid.
when I try to re-compile the package, its breaking at the follwoing line :
-- Constants
C Constants := Constants(0);
NOTE : The Package valid in the other envirionment where the database is still in oracle 9.2.0.5

What is it 'breaking' with? an error? what error?
What is "constants"? Where has that object type been declared?

Objects using dblinks become invalid

I am using numerous functions / procedures / synonyms which point to other databases via dblinks. All was well when the dbLinks / synonyms were public. Last week I was asked to put up a test schema on the same database so I duly made all the public dblinks & synonyms private. All seemed well, everything compiled so I made it live.
Now we get intermittent problems whereby the procedures using the synonyms & dblinks suddenly become invalid. They refuse to automatically compile, causing errors in the applications using the database. SOmetimes they automatically recompile after a time, sometimes they refuse to compile until I do them manually in SQL developer.
anybody have any idea why this should be happening?
Main database is Oracle Enterprise 11.1.0.7 64 bit, connecting to one of same version, one of 10.2.0.4 64 bit. All running on AIX 6.1.

Hi,
Same thing is happening here.
DB A with PROC_SP (Strore procedure)
DB B with 2 users; user TEST1 referencing PROC_SP@A and user TEST2 referencing also PROC_SP@A.
When compiling code on user TEST1 that uses PROC_SP@A, the code on TEST2 becames invalid, and vice-versa.
Did you solve your problem ?
My Database version is 11.2.0.2.0, both DB (A and B) use the same version (Exadata with 11R2)
Thanks in advance.

Index becomes invalid

Hi,
11g on linux.
I have a batch job run from the application end to refresh the table data. The data may be loaded through sql-loader/DML.
After running of the batch job, some of the indexes becomes unusable state.
I dont suspect the index becomes invalid due to duplicate records in primary key. Since I'm able to rebuild the index manually.
I like to investigate from database end what the batch job does and make the indexes unsuable.
I'm planning to 10046 trace session trace.
Could you please share your comments, how to take this forward to find the Root Cause of what is actually happening on the objects and makes index unusable.
Thanks
KSG
Edited by: KSG on May 30, 2013 8:03 PM

KSG wrote:
Hi,
11g on linux.
I have a batch job run from the application end to refresh the table data. The data may be loaded through sql-loader/DML.
After running of the batch job, some of the indexes becomes unusable state.
I dont suspect the index becomes invalid due to duplicate records in primary key. Since I'm able to rebuild the index manually.
I like to investigate from database end what the batch job does and make the indexes unsuable.
I'm planning to 10046 trace session trace.
Could you please share your comments, how to take this forward to find what is actually happening on the objects and makes index unusable.
Thanks
KSGhttp://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=oracle+index+unusable
Handle:     KSG
Status Level:     Explorer (130)
Registered:     Dec 23, 2008
Total Posts:     766
Total Questions:     212 (146 unresolved)
I extend to you my condolences; since you rarely get your questions answered here.

Document certification becoming INVALID after Ctrl+F in Acrobat 9. Possible bug?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for