Document flow is not updated for Scheduling agreement
Hi Gurus,
Can you please advise on the below issue..
Some deliveries created with reference of schedule agreement are not displayed in scheduling agreement in forecast delivery schedule under delivery tab and as well as not updated in document flow for VBFA table.
There are two ways to create delivery with reference of Scheduling agreement , 1) Create Delivery order (Order Type : TAM) with reference of SA, then delivery for TAM order.
2) we can add the line item in existing TAM order with reference of SA .
Advance thanks for your valid points.
Best regards,
Venkat.
Hi Ram,
Thanks for the reply, there is no issue in copy control settings.
Best regards,
Venkat.
Similar Messages
-
Header text not printed for scheduling agreement
Hi All,
I have issue with header text print out for scheduling agreement (SA).
In SA when I am manually writing some note and then taking print out, system is giving me correct output with maual note.
I have one standard text (ST) which I need to be printed in evry SA, so in SPRO I created new head text for vendor and in copying rule for text for SA, I created linkage of SA header text with Vendor head text.
In vendor master, I inserted ST in newly created vendor header text.
So now when ever I create new SA for vendor system will determin header text from vendor master.
Now after creating SA when I check the SA, I am able to my ST in SA, but at the time of print out this ST in not printing.
Please let me know what could be the reson.
Regards,
SameerI dont understand about what you mean by expand.
When you a print PO, PO text (header or item) it will check to the configuration setting.
The system didnt care if its adopted from vendor master or info record, or whatever you make in the copying rule.
In your case : you create a standard text then it get copied into PO , then you set the standard text to the PO for print out, example the standard text : word is
"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
Then in the PO the text appear will be like below(the same, because it get copied)
"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
If you configure it in define text for SA, then it the print out it will also (the same)
"xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
So what text need to expand? -
Vendor address not updated in Scheduling Agreement
I have a peculiar problem where the vendor address is not being updated in all scheduling agreements. I have multiple SAs against a vendor. When i change the name of the vendor, the name changes only in one of the SA. All the remaining SA carry the old name of the vendor. I tested with another vendor on the test system and the names on all the agreements change as soon as I make the change in the vendor master.
Does anyone have any explanation on why the system is behaving strangely?
ThanksHi,
I am more surprised that the name changed automatically on the ones that DID change.
I would not have expected this to update in this way. The main idea is that outline agrements can have different data to the master records because they are specific agreements and often relate to very specific data.
If you wanted to change the address of a vendor it should NOT change the address of existinmg VSAs etc. automatically because the document is a =fixed contract that is agreed between you and the vendor and should ONLY be changed manually.
We had a similar question earlier today asking why the system does not change the short description on a contract when the short description on the material master changes. My reply was basically the same, it SHOULDN'T change it automatically because the agreement is a legal document and cannot be changed by just ONE of the parties involved.
So I would be asking why the one VSA changed automatically (and the ones in the test syste) not why the others didn't change.
Just trying to lok at this from all angles.
Steve B -
Problem Regarding TABLE updation for Scheduling Agreement
Dear Experts,
We have noticed that whenever we are releasing any Delivery Schedule for a line item against a Scheduling Agreement the table field ABART(Scheduling Agreement Release Type) in table EKET is not getting updated,but the same field or column in TABLE EKEH or EKEK is getting updated.
Please advice what is the problem and how to resolve the same.
Regards,
SoumickHi,
The scheduling agreement schedule line is not firmed physically:The fixing indicator (EKET-FIXKZ) is empty for this schedule line.
This can be checked in Transaction ME39 or with Transaction SE16 for table EKET for the corresponding schedule line.
In the MRP group of the corresponding material, it is set that only transferred scheduling agreement schedule lines should be regarded as firmed (Transaction OPPR, firming scheduling agreement, Firm transmSLines [Field XFAT1]).
In this case, only such scheduling agreement schedule lines are firmed which were transferred by message transmission through purchasing to the vendor. (see also the F1 help for the field).
However, the system displays all scheduling agreement schedule lines as fixed in Transaction MD04 within the release period and assigns them with a star ('*'), that is, this applies also scheduling agreement schedule lines with a transmitted quantity of 0.
In contrast to the above, these schedule lines are not displayed as fixed in Transaction MD05 or in the planning with 'Display result'.
Note 354164 explains this system behavior.
For the planning, the transmitted quantity is considered as fixed if this is correspondingly set in the MRP group of the material.
If the transmitted quantity was updated correctly, it should be contained in field AMENG of table EKET.
By using Transaction SE16 for this table and the corresponding schedule line (scheduling agreement number EBELN, item EBELP, schedule line ETENR), you should be able to find out....
transmitted quantity was written to the database and a fixing can be carried out correspondingly in amount of the transmitted quantity or whether no update of the transmitted quantity occurred (see below Notes 82169, 117093, 134356).
Solution
First, the system behaves as intended.
It should be checked whether the function, which is controlled by this indicator, is actually wanted this way (to firm only scheduling agreement schedule lines which actually have been transferred).
In addition, problems can occur in purchasing when the printed quantity is updated (AMENG).This symptom can especially occur after you have upgraded from a release < Release 4.0A to a release > Release 4.0B.
In this regard, see the related Notes 82169, 117093 and 134356.
Regards,
Udaya. -
Outbound delivery document flow is not updated after LT0G
Hello Gurus,
after executing LT0G Returd to stock from delivery, a document flow of outbound delivery is not updated. Still an OvrllPickStatus remains = C Fully picked and OverallWMStatus = C WM trsf ord confirmd. This though the goods result to be returned correctly from 916 into stock.. What can be the reason for this malfunctioning?
JariMany thank for your feedback. The transaction LT0G is executed succefully and a destination storage bin results a correct quantity. Anyway I checked SM13 and a log is empty.
The notes you mentioned seemed very promising, but unfortunately they are not relevant as a release in where I am working is SAP ECC 6.0 SAPKH60013.
I am still trying to find some possible other notes but without a success so far.
Jari -
After completion of GR(MIGO) delivey document flow was not updated.
We have to move the stock from PlantA to PlantB . Purchase order and deliveries and PGI has been created and stock is picked out of PlantA . For that delivey goods reciept also completed, when i checked in Purchase order history system showing GR has been completed. but in delivey document flow system showing upto GI document. GR document was not updated.
When i checked in MB5T stock is showing under *Display purchase orders with delivery completed too*
Thanks in advance****
Edited by: RAVI Y on Feb 18, 2009 7:10 AM
Edited by: RAVI Y on Feb 18, 2009 7:28 AMDear Ravi,
How can we check GR (MIGO) is completed with reference to outbound delivey or PO?
Regards
Ravi
Edited by: RAVI Y on Feb 18, 2009 9:55 AM
Edited by: RAVI Y on Feb 18, 2009 9:56 AM -
EDI Message not Transmitted for Scheduling Agreement
Hi guys!
Does anybody know what should I check to see why the EDI message for a delivery line in the scheduling agreement has not been transmitted? Would really save me
Regards,
IleanaHi
First check the message whether it has been processed properly or not . goto ME39 , Check the message(Shift +F1)
if the message is in red, check the processing log,
If the message is in yellow , process the same using ME9E
If the message is in grren means the Idoc's are generated.
Now got Transaction WE05 & Check the IDoc's giving the Basic type - DELFOR02
Give from & to dates based on the rpocessing date of the message.
Here check the Idoc's are in Red or green . If in red check the Message in the Status.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore -
Document flow is not updated in outbound delivery
Hi,
I have issue at my client side that We create Transfer order and it is not updating in outbound delivery document flow. Update without delay is check in shipping configuration. Can somebody please provide the reason, Configuration missing or some OSS note which can help us?
Thanks,
RDHi rohit
I had refered to SAP OSS note 358454 earlier.
Reward if useful
Regards
SE -
HI Experts,
I am doing Order to cash Cycle, and iam using CIN also, when i am saving Billing document iam getting the following error
Express document "Update was terminated" received from author
Error in allocating internal document number Interval not found Number object J_Error in allocating internal document number Interval not found Number object J_
Kindly check the Object J_1IINTNUM to assign the Number Range.
Express document "Update was terminated" received from author
Pls check if the Number Range is full.
Best Regards,
Ankur -
Originating document number not updated for one invoice line item
Hi,
We have a invoice document number in which the originating document number is not updated for one of the line items ,this is order related down payment invoice .May be this is due to system inconsistency so is there any SAP note to overcome this problem.
Best Regards,
RohitDear All,
I found out the problem for not updated in F-04. "While create the receipt document in GL master Open item management maintained box was not checked". It can be found in BSIS table - OI Management'.
Is there any other way to clear this document.
Thanks... -
Error in MIGO for Scheduling Agreement
Dear All,
I have created a Scheduling agreement in LP document type and saved with Net price.
When i do the MIGO the error appears as below.
Transaction cannot be posted due to errors in price determination
Message no. ME573
Diagnosis
The error marked with 'X' occurred during the price determination process for purchasing document 5500000087 00010:
[X] Net price is 0.
[ ] Net price is negative.
and/or there are no valid conditions or the duration of the
contract has ended.
[ ] Effective value is negative.
[ ] Mandatory condition missing.
[ ] Negative delivery costs.
[ ] Delivery costs have been recorded although invoice
receipts are not defined for the item.
[ ] Error during quantity conversion
[ ] Error during currency translation
[ ] Field overflow
[ ] A condition involving delivery costs exists without a
transaction/event key.
[ ]Error during maint. of delivery costs in master conditions
Delivery cost conditions in different validity periods not identical
System Response
The transaction cannot be posted without successful price determination.
Procedure
Check the purchasing document and the associated conditions:
Display purchase order
Display scheduling agreement
If the problem cannot be resolved in this way, contact your system administrator.
The latter can check the Customizing settings for price determination in Purchasing under Conditions -> Define Price Determination Process
When the foregoing steps have been carried out, try posting the transaction again.
Kindly advice how to avoid this error.
RegardsHi
What type of document type are you using for Scheduling agreement? I think you are using time dependent conditions. (see it in document type definition config). If the tick mark is done for time dependent condition then in additional data of scheduling agreement line item pr.date category will be 5-GR date. So Your validity period for condition is not valid for today thats why you are getting error. You need to change validity period for your conditions. Then you will not get error.
Regards
Antony -
Foreign Trade - Legal Control for scheduling agreements
We are on version 4.6C and I am setting up the legal control for my company. It seems to work quite well for sales orders but then when I went in to configure scheduling agreements it errors and tells me you cannot do legal control for document type "E" which are typically scheduling agreements.
I cannot find any documentation on this. Does anyone know why legal control does not work for scheduling agreements and/or is this functionality available in the Global Trade Services module??
Thanks in advance for any and all help!!
DebbieJean,
I have done a Foreign trade implementation.
The core team of the client are FT experts and they would tell you about the legal requirements. Your job is to map them in SAP FT.
In this process you would gain Knowledge about Foreign trade regulations of that country. Remember its country specific.
The ECCN's are provided by the client. Info abt the same is extensivley available on the NET.
You have to get the list of all the mtrls which fall under the controlled cantegory of the respective commerce ministry and then start the config setting these mtrls as relevant for FT checks.
Thanks
Vishal -
MRP To Generate SCHEDULE LINES for Scheduling Agreement
Hi
I have followed the below steps but still the Schedule lines is not generated for scheduling agreement.
1Maintain MRP views 1,2,3,4 for the material in material mste.(MM01)
2. Maintain Purchase Info Record for the vendor plant & material combination.(ME11)
3. Create Scheduling agreement using ME31L
4. Maintain source list for the material & the scheduling agreement # and Line item set the MRP relevant indicator 2 (Necessary ?) ME01
During Run MRP for the material.the below details entered///
Processing key NETCH Net Change in Total Horizon
Create purchase req. 1 Purchase requisitions in opening period
Schedule lines 3 Schedule lines
Create MRP list 1 MRP list
Planning mode 1 Determination of Basic Dates for Planned
Run MDBT or MD02 but still doesn't create the schedule lines......Anything else missing.
MRP1:
MRP Procedure: PD
MRP Group: 0000 (External Procurement only)
Lot Size: EX (Lot For Lot)
MRP2:
Procurement Type: F
Sched Margin Key: 000
MRP3:
Avilablity chec: 02 (Individual requirement)
MRP: 4
NilRaj,
Source List a Mandatory for Scheduling Agreement, if you want to create automatic Scheduling line.
Plz use (2) in MRP RELEVENT tab in ME01 (Source List).
rest of the thing is ok, make sure a material master(MRP 2 VIEW) in that view you have to give a planed delivery days. it is must.
HOPE IT WILL WORK
Regards:
Poision -
SD Document Flow is not been Updated
Hi,
I am using MB_CREATE_GOODS_MOVEMENT and MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENT to create Goods Movement.
These FMs create the Material Document, but they don't update the Delivery flow.
Manuaaly goods issue is done through VL02N and it updates the document flow.
Note:- Bapi_goodsmvt_create cannot be used as it doesnot support movement types 643 and 644.
Please help.
Regards,
Nitesh.hi , run this fm in a series like
se37 : in menu tool bar ; function module -
> then test ---> test sequence enter your function module in the next sequence enter fm name as bapi_transcation_commit . end run the fm then it may slove the prb
why because data base table are not updated with out using commit work . some times orders created means fm are executed successfully and it generate order number s but those are not avalible in Data Base tables . so please try it once
if your problem is sloved plesae close the thread
Regards
Siva -
KSPP -Scheduled Activity are not updated for last 2 periods
Hi All,
When we run KSPP by using LTP, noticed that for one cost center and activity type the plan scheduled Acivities are not updated for last 2 period's.(shows Zero)
Do we miss any thing.
Regards,
RajHi,
It can be due to the sales demand you have uploaded and the Lead time in the material master
because of the that, the demand gets shifted before (say, Dec demand gets shifted for manufacturing in October) and the activity qty in the last month comes zero
So, upload 14 months demand where 13 and 14th month is the same as 12th month... Most of the companies do this way
Ajay M
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi Experts, I have an CUBE which is loading once in a week(full load). In that cube i have plant and material and some other fields . My requirement is 1) i have to delete some materials from all the plants from the cube like mat1,mat2,mat3..etc from
-
New White Paper: "Oracle 9i PL/SQL New Features"
The July issue of the Pipeline Newsletter includes an 8-page feature article entitled "Oracle 9i PL/SQL New Features", written by Sandeepan Banerjee, of Oracle's PL/SQL Development Team. Click on the URL below for the newsletter: http://www.revealnet
-
How do I cancel a service order so I can get a new box
Need help I want to cancel an old service request so I can request a new box
-
How to set my iPad as a default device while my iPhone and iPad share a same email address?
-
Hi Apple users, A few months ago my iPhone 4 button stopped working and has made my phone unusable. Most of my friends that have had iPhones for about a year have a similar fault. I recently contacted Apple to discuss this and ask how to fix it. They