Document has been checked out by A user for processing

Hi Friends,
We have three status in our process. CT (Create), IW (Inwork), RE(Release).
We have following doc. status type for each status.
CT- I (Initial)
IW- O (Original Processing status)
RE- S (Locked stats)
User A has created document. Uer B has changed status to IW . User C trying to change to RE. In that case we are getting the following message. Document has been checked out by A user for processing.
We are having Characteristics associated to doc. type. Those are not able to change while in RE release mode.
I change the doc. status type to
CT- I
IW - C (Check in Status)
RE- S
and
CT- P
IW - I
RE- S
Even then problem remains the same.
How to get rid of this.
Regards,
Sai Krishna

hi,
U can use only, Primary staus P
And chec in status C
And relesed statuse S
This should work
Benakaraja
??p

Similar Messages

Delivery Document has been created - showing the status of Being Processed.

Hi All.
I am facing the following typical problem.
1. Sales order has been created - showing the status of COMPLETED.
2. Delivery Document has been created - showing the status of Being Processed.
3. Goods Issue document created successfully- showing status as COMPLETE
4. Billing Document has created successfully - showing the status as COMPLETED.
5. Customer Account got updated properly.
Query: Despite of completion of SO, DELIVERY, GOODS ISSUED, AND BILLING DOCUMENT u2013 and accounting document is cleared why the outbound Delivery document status is showing as BEING PROCESSED.
If I go T-code Vlo3n see document flow
Delivery 5080789885 being processed.
Go to VF03 document flow also it is showing
Delivery 5080789885 being processed.
Aditya

Hi ALL,
Further to my query I would like to clarify the following:
It is happening since 2004 all Bom components status (Delivery being processed) all the BOM main items header status is showing completed.
It not impacting the business, but suddenly user raise query SO, DELIVERY, GOODS ISSUED, AND BILLING DOCUMENT completed why still delivery showing as being processed.
1. I have checked at SO level -- all the line items were delivered. ie: delivery, goods issue, billing completed.
2. I checked the Header Level data completed and Item Level data being processed.
3. If I look into the each item level also it is showing as being processed.
4. Even the SALES ORDER HEADER LEVEL showing the status of Completed.
5. Removed credit check in delivery.
The only issue is OUTBOUND DELIVERY DOCUMENT: Status alone it is showing as ' Being Processed' -- surprisingly!
Aditya.

How to find original document for which settlement has been carried out.

Hello Friends,
As a process of period end, we have executed the automatic settlement for assets under construction for an internal order through KO8G.
After completing the run system has posted a document successfully.
When I want to check the original document for posted document through FB03, through Environment  Document Environment  Original document. System is showing the same settlement document rather than the original document.
Can any one explain me how to check the original document for which settlement has been carried out.
Regards,
RS

"Original document" means from where the document originated. Means for eg MM invoice will be original document for FI invoice. Hoever for settlement document, Settlement process it self is the origin for posting. This way, You cannt trace back the Fi postings which got settled. You need to run line item report for the object and analyse the Fi postings and corresponding Settlement postings

Can't seem to change the Document Properties Advanced Reading Options in a Form that was created in Adobe LiveCycle. This option has been "greyed" out - anyone know how to update this to English so I can pass Accessibility Testing?

Can't seem to change the Document Properties > Advanced > Reading Options in a Form that was created in Adobe LiveCycle. This option has been "greyed" out - anyone know how to update this to English so I can pass Accessibility Testing?

LiveCycle forms use a very different approach to create a PDF form than Acrobat and that approach makes many features for processing PDFs non-functional.
You might want to ask this question in one of the LiveCycle product forums.

How do I know a user has been logged out from another screen

If one user is already logged in to the web application and another user with the same user name and password trying to log in to the same web application, i need to logout the first screen's user session. In other word, I want to disable first screen access right since it has been logged out.
I have a user log class to record users login activities. A new user log object will be created for every login.
How should I do that?

Try to write an implementation of HttpSessionListener and HttpSessionAttributeListener something like the one down below and configure it accordingly.Believe tht should very well cater your requirment.
public SessionAttributeListener implements HttpSessionAttributeListener,HttpSessionListner{
   List<HttpSession> sessionsList;
    public SessionAttributeListener(){
         this.sessionsList = new ArrayList<HttpSession>();
    public void sessionCreated(HttpSessionEvent se){
    public void sessionDestroyed(HttpSessionEvent se) {
            this.sessionList.remove(se.getSession());
    public void attributeAdded(HttpSessionBindingEvent se){
                if(se.getName().equals("userInfo"))
                     this.appAction(se);
    public void attributeRemoved(HttpSessionBindingEvent se){
              if(se.getName().equals("userInfo"))
                        this.sessionsList.remove(se.getSession());
    public void attributeReplaced(HttpSessionBindingEvent se) {
    private void appAction(HttpSessionBindingEvent se){
                UserBean ub = (UserBean)se.getValue();
                 for(HttpSession session:this.sessionsList) {
                         UserBean ub1 = (UserBean)session.getAttribute("userInfo");
                         if(ub1.getUserName().equals(ub.getUserName())){
                                try{
                                   session.removeAttribute("userInfo");
                                   session.invalidate();
                               }catch(Exception exp){}
                this.sessionsList.add(se.getSession());
}Hope this might give you a brief idea of how to go about. :)
REGARDS,
RaHuL

How during deployment my user id has been checked by J2EE engine

Hi,
If I want to transport my application, Do I need a valid user ID created in J2EE engine UME. If it is, How during deployment my user id has been checked by J2EE engine.
Thanx for your time.
Cheers,
Sam

Hi,
to deploy your application to the J2EE engine you normaly use SDM (Software Deployment Manager). You need a password (no user Id) to deploy via SDM. This password was set up during installation of the Web AS. You can reset this password via SDM command line tool. Have a look at the SDM documentation for details.
SDM uses the deploy service of the J2EE engine to deploy the application. Therefore SDM connects to the J2EE engine via a username and password that are stored in the secure store (Configtool -> Secure Store). This user is normally identical with the administration user. If you change the password of the administrator you also have to change the password in the secure store. Oterwise you cannot deploy via SDM.
Regards Helmut

F110 Payment run stopped, status Payment run has been carried out.

Hi experts,
I have searched in this forum but didn't find suitable scenario.
I have run automatic payment after the proposal created.
Somehow the payment run status stopped at "Payment run has been carried out".
Then I check the payment run log:
Job started
Step 001 started (program SAPF110S, variant &0000000007737, user name xxxxxx)
Log for payment run for payment on xx.xx.2009, identification XXxxx
System error occurred during blocking attempt; payment run stopped
... the execution of the payment program is terminated
End of log
Job finished
I thought no accounting document has been posted.
Is it the right way if I re-run the program SAPF110S with its variant?
What is the possible impact.
Kindly advise.
regards,
rob

Hi,
Yes there might be no accounting document has been posted because even though the payment run has been carried out but parameters you have mentioned might not been selected because of many reasons.
Please go to EDIT - Payment -
Payment list and exception list.......
Please check if any entry is there in payment list if it is than some doc has been posted.
Rest will go to EXCEPTION list.... will show you the exact errors.
Please check the same in the proposal run first... it seems that PROPOSAL run in not only correct.
See the error and correct it.

Incopy document won't check out or in

So here is the issue we are working in Indesign and exported .imcl files (incopy). Because our book is 900 pages we have around 45 documents set up in an indesign book.
From Indesign we check out various blocks of copy to edit them and then check them back in.
All three of our computers lock up when trying to check various blocks in or out. To the point of having to force quit the progam. We have waited as long as 1hr before force quiting so this is not an issue of being impatient (LOL)The problem is it is very inconsistant.
• I have checked to make sure our hardware is what is needed and they are fine
• The copy in question is not missing and is fully linked
• The copy is not checked out by another user
• Occasionally Indesign will prompt me saying that it is an invalid Incopy file but this is not always the case
My last quesstion is we do not actually have the Incopy program we are using the plug-ins through Indesign. I am not the one who set these files up so I don't really know enough to know if that is a problem.
I hope someone can help me out I think we are all going to be bald by the end of this catalog if we don't come up with a resolution!

Well for anyone interested I figured out what my problem was. When you export
Incopy from Indesign for some reason it creates hyperlinks and not just a few.
All I had to do was go in through my hyper links pallet click on the drop
down to the right and choose hyperlink destination options. This brings up a window that has an option to delete all. All of the hyperlinks were jamming up Indesign. If for some reason the file crashed then I had to copy the content to a new set of pages and re-save the file. I still had to go and delete all of the hyper links through the desitination options but after that our files were fine. It has been a month and we have not had anymore problems. Do make sure if you export anymore copy to periodicaly go through the process over again to avoid the problem again.

Not able to create Follow up transaction since it has been grayed out

Hi Experts,
We have a scenario where in we will create the Sales Transactions (OR) in ECC and then it will replicates to CRM.
In CRM we wants to create Returns Order (RE) as a follow up Transaction to OR (which is replicated from ECC to CRM) .
When I tried to create Returns Order (RE) in CRM as a follow up document to Sales Transaction (OR), the follow up Transaction CRM Returns (RE) has been grayed out. I mean it is in display mode only.
And then I created Sales Transaction (OR) in CRM itself and then I tried to create follow up Returns Transaction (RE) I was able to create.
But I am not able to Create Returns Order (RE) for the Sales Transactions (OR) that have been replicated from ECC to CRM.
Can anybody help me in resolving this issue. Any help ful answer will be rewarded with points.
Thanks in advance,
-Frederick Johnson.

Hi Fredrick,
Please check, whether you have completed all the steps for Copying Control for Business Transactions in the following path in IMG:
SPRO->Customer Relationship Management->Transactions->Basic Settings->Copying Control for Business Transactions:
- Define Copying Control for Transaction Types
In this step, you define the control for copying business transaction types.
To do this, you enter a source tranaction type and a target transaction type, and define the corresponding conditions for this combination.
- Define Copying Control for Item Categories
In this step, you define the control for copying item categories.
To do so, you enter a source item category and a target item category, and define the corresponding conditions.
- Define Item Category Determination when Copying
In this step, you define a specific item category determination which should be run during copying. The item category is used to find the target item category in the source transaction for the transaction type in the target transaction. This means that the transaction type for the source transaction is not relevant for the item category determination.
If the system cannot find an entry for the copying transaction in this table, the item category is found in the target transaction using the normal item category determination.
This might help you
regards
Srikantan

Iphone4 would not restore Error -50. I have tried to restore and it restored it to the point that it created after 5.0 was installed. How can I get it an older restore point from my backups and restore it on another computer? The phone has been wiped out.

Iphone would not restore---- Error -50. I have tried to restore, and it restored it to the new point that it created after 5.0 was installed. How can I get it an older restore point from my backups and restore it on another computer? The phone has been wiped out. I can see earlier backups in my C:\Documents and Settings\user\Application Data\Apple Computer\MobileSync\Backup folder. There are four subfolders in this address. I need my contacts, photos, and messages back. I know this is a common error but I can not figure it out. I have ran the other troublshoot items in the error steps for 13 and 14 like apple says. Is there a way to call apple and get a step by step of how to restore from another restore point? Does anybody have a solution????

It tells you to go to Error 13 and 14 if you receive error (-50).
Here is what I have tried...
Error 13 and 14: These errors are typically resolved by performing one or more of the steps listed below:
Perform USB isolation troubleshooting, including trying a different USB port directly on the computer. See the advanced steps below for USB troubleshooting. I have moved it around to different ports.
Put a USB 2.0 hub between the device and the computer. Didn't change anything.
Try a different USB 30-pin dock-connector cable.
Eliminate third-party security software conflicts. Removed all virus protection and firewall.
There may be third-party software installed that modifies your default packet size in Windows by inserting one or more TcpWindowSize entries into your registry. Your default packet size being set incorrectly can cause this error. Contact the manufacturer of the software that installed the packet-size modification for assistance. Or, follow this article by Microsoft: How to reset Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) to reset the packet size back to the default for Windows.Used the Microsoft fix it.
Connect your computer directly to your Internet source, bypassing any routers, hubs, or switches. You may need to restart your computer and modem to get online. Doesn't matter.
Try to restore from another known-good computer and network. I do not know how to do this or how to find the correct/full/complete restore point. There should be more information for this.

I have a new MacBook Pro with OS10.8.2 and cannot get Contacts to print a list of addresses with pictures showing. There is a check box selecting "picture" which has been checked - but no picture. This worked fine on OS10.7.5. Problem??

I have a new MacBook Pro with OS10.8.2 and cannot get Contacts to print a list of addresses with pictures showing. There is a check box selecting "picture" which has been checked - but no picture. This worked fine on OS10.7.5. Problem??

First, back up all data immediately, as your boot drive might be failing.
There are a few other possible causes of generalized slow performance that you can rule out easily.
Reset the System Management Controller.
If you have many image or video files on the Desktop with preview icons, move them to another folder.
If applicable, uncheck all boxes in the iCloud preference pane.
Disconnect all non-essential wired peripherals and remove aftermarket expansion cards, if any.
Check your keychains in Keychain Access for excessively duplicated items.
If you have more than one user account, you must be logged in as an administrator to carry out this step.
Launch the Console application in the same way you launched Activity Monitor. Make sure the title of the Console window is All Messages. If it isn't, select All Messages from the SYSTEM LOG QUERIES menu on the left. If you don't see that menu, select
View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar.
Select the 50 or so most recent entries in the log. Copy them to the Clipboard (command-C). Paste into a reply to this message (command-V). You're looking for entries at the end of the log, not at the beginning.
When posting a log extract, be selective. Don't post more than is requested.
Please do not indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Important: Some personal information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting. That should be easy to do if your extract is not too long.

SCOM reports "A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file. This may result in severe performance degradation"

This was discussed here, with no resolution
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchange2010/thread/bb073c59-b88f-471b-a209-d7b5d9e5aa28?prof=required
I have the same issue. This is a single-purpose physical mailbox server with 320 users and 72GB of RAM. That should be plenty. I've checked and there are no manual settings for the database cache. There are no other problems with
the server, nothing reported in the logs, except for the aforementioned error (see below).
The server is sluggish. A reboot will clear up the problem temporarily. The only processes using any significant amount of memory are store.exe (using 53GB), regsvc (using 5) and W3 and Monitoringhost.exe using 1 GB each. Does anyone have
any ideas on this?
Warning ESE Event ID 906.
Information Store (1497076) A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file. This may result in severe performance degradation. See help link for complete details of possible causes. Resident cache
has fallen by 213107 buffers (or 11%) in the last 207168 seconds. Current Total Percent Resident: 79% (1574197 of 1969409 buffers)

Brian,
We had this event log entry as well which SCOM picked up on, and 10 seconds before it the Forefront Protection 2010 for Exchange updated all of its engines.
We are running Exchange 2010 SP2 RU3 with no file system antivirus (the boxes are restricted and have UAC turned on as mitigations). We are running the servers primarily as Hub Transport servers with 16GB of RAM, but they do have the mailbox role installed
for the sole purpose of serving as our public folder servers.
So we theroized the STORE process was just grabbing a ton of RAM, and occasionally it was told to dump the memory so the other processes could grab some - thus generating the alert. Up until last night we thought nothing of it, but ~25 seconds after the
cache flush to paging file, we got the following alert:
Log Name:      Application
Source:        MSExchangeTransport
Date:          8/2/2012 2:08:14 AM
Event ID:      17012
Task Category: Storage
Level:         Error
Keywords:      Classic
User:          N/A
Computer:      HTS1.company.com
Description:
Transport Mail Database: The database could not allocate memory. Please close some applications to make sure you have enough memory for Exchange Server. The exception is Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.IsamOutOfMemoryException: Out of Memory (-1011)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.JetInterop.CallW(Int32 errFn)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.JetInterop.MJetOpenDatabase(MJET_SESID sesid, String file, String connect, MJET_GRBIT grbit, MJET_WRN& wrn)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.JetInterop.MJetOpenDatabase(MJET_SESID sesid, String file, MJET_GRBIT grbit)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.JetInterop.MJetOpenDatabase(MJET_SESID sesid, String file)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Isam.Interop.MJetOpenDatabase(MJET_SESID sesid, String file)
   at Microsoft.Exchange.Transport.Storage.DataConnection..ctor(MJET_INSTANCE instance, DataSource source).
Followed by:
Log Name:      Application
Source:        MSExchangeTransport
Date:          8/2/2012 2:08:15 AM
Event ID:      17106
Task Category: Storage
Level:         Information
Keywords:      Classic
User:          N/A
Computer:      HTS1.company.com
Description:
Transport Mail Database: MSExchangeTransport has detected a critical storage error, updated the registry key (SOFTWARE\Microsoft\ExchangeServer\v14\Transport\QueueDatabase) and as a result, will attempt self-healing after process restart.
Log Name:      Application
Source:        MSExchangeTransport
Date:          8/2/2012 2:13:50 AM
Event ID:      17102
Task Category: Storage
Level:         Warning
Keywords:      Classic
User:          N/A
Computer:      HTS1.company.com
Description:
Transport Mail Database: MSExchangeTransport has detected a critical storage error and has taken an automated recovery action. This recovery action will not be repeated until the target folders are renamed or deleted. Directory path:E:\EXCHSRVR\TransportRoles\Data\Queue
is moved to directory path:E:\EXCHSRVR\TransportRoles\Data\Queue\Queue.old.
So it seems as if the Forefront Protection 2010 for Exchange inadvertently trigger the cache flush which didn't appear to happen quick or thuroughly enough for the transport service to do what it needed to do, so it freaked out and performed the subsequent
actions.
Do you have any ideas on how to prevent this 906 warning, which cascaded into a transport service outage?
Thanks!

ESE - Event Log Warning: 906 - A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file...

Hello -
We have 3 x EX2010 SP3 RU5 nodes in a cross-site DAG.
Multi-role servers with 18 GB RAM [increased from 16 GB in an attempt to clear this warning without success].
We run nightly backups on both nodes at the Primary Site.
Node 1 backup covers all mailbox databases [active & passive].
Node 2 backup covers the Public Folders database.
The backups for each database are timed so they do not overlap.
During each backup we get several of these event log warnings:
Log Name:      Application
Source:        ESE
Date:          23/04/2014 00:47:22
Event ID:      906
Task Category: Performance
Level:         Warning
Keywords:      Classic
User:          N/A
Computer:      EX1.xxx.com
Description:
Information Store (5012) A significant portion of the database buffer cache has been written out to the system paging file. This may result in severe performance degradation.
See help link for complete details of possible causes.
Resident cache has fallen by 42523 buffers (or 27%) in the last 903 seconds.
Current Total Percent Resident: 26% (110122 of 421303 buffers)
We've rescheduled the backups and the warning message occurences just move with the backup schedules.
We're not aware of perceived end-user performance degradation, overnight backups in this time zone coincide with the business day for mailbox users in SEA.
I raised a call with the Microsoft Enterprise Support folks, they had a look at BPA output and from their diagnostics tool. We have enough RAM and no major issues detected.
They suggested McAfee AV could be the root of our problems, but we have v8.8 with EX2010 exceptions configured.
Backup software is Asigra V12.2 with latest hotfixes.
We're trying to clear up these warnings as they're throwing SCOM alerts and making a mess of availability reporting.
Any suggestions please?
Thanks in advance

Having said all that, a colleague has suggested we just limit the amount of RAM available for the EX2010 DB cache
Then it won't have to start releasing RAM when the backup runs, and won't throw SCOM alerts
This attribute should do it...
msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee832793.aspx
Give me a shout if this is a bad idea
Thanks

Is it standard behavior for VL10A/table VEPVG to show two records when a Sales Document has been blocked?

Hi Experts,
Is it standard behavior for VL10A to show two records when a Sales Document has been blocked? Their only difference is the field Delivery Block. In VL10A, the first record has a delivery block of BLANK, the second has 99.
Here's how to replicate the issue.
Create sales order.
When you check VL10A, the Sales document is there.
Change sales order field (RSD) in VA02, Save.
When you check VL10A, there are now two records, one has a blank delivery block, the other has 99.
The expected result here is that after changing in VA02, there will be only 1 record in VL10A and it should have delivery block of 99.
Assumptions:
1. We know that VL10A retrieves its records from VEPVG. The problem is, in VEPVG, delivery block is a key field. So I think that during VA02, when the delivery block of 99 is assigned, this creates a record in VEPVG instead of updating the existing one. Is this standard behavior, and are my assumptions correct?
Thanks in advanced experts. Appreciate your prompt response,
Jack

Hello Jack,
This is the standard behavior. When I check in our system, I too can see two entries but with different good issue date and delivery date and the block is specific to good issue date, delivery date.
So there is no problem in it. try to give the delivery date which includes two table entries delivery date and execute the transaction VL10A.
Regards,
TP

F110-payment has been carried out

Hi ,
After making the payment, status is showing as payment has been carried out........what may be the reasons for this.
Regards,
Dharani

Hello Dharani,
I have the same case as you.
In fact i didn't found any explanations for that but i resolved the problem by deleting the proposal and parameters also.
Then, i created it again, i entered parameters and i save and it works fine.
Other thing that you have to check: Please check if there is other payment run that still exist in the system and that use all or some parameters as the current one and delete them.
Be sure that there no other payment ID that still open
Regards
T

Document has been checked out by A user for processing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for