Document is not cretaed but test run is successful.

Hello this is the my problem.
While runninf AFAB test run is successful but no document is getting posted.
Data :
Dep key assigned ZEIN
Cal Methods Assigned :
Base Method 014 Period Control 01 Multilevel ZEI(4.75% of Dep)
Asset Values is there even tthough why I couldnt get the document after AFAB in test mode.
Plz advice ASAP.

Did you look at the spool in SM37 after you ran the transaction to see if it indicated any problems?
Had you run ASKB (or ASKBN) first before running AFAB?

Similar Messages

Battery not availble BUT still running off battery!?!

So yesterday, my MacBook decided to not show up... what? Randomly, out of the blue! It had previously been working just fine, about 80% health, and then, all of a sudden, it stops recognizing that there's a battery installed. Here's the funny part, though... The battery still has a charge (as shown by LEDs on the bottom), and the MacBook still runs off the battery, despite it saying it doesn't have one! Unsurprisingly, the battery doesn't charge either.
The computer will only start up if plugged in, but can subsequently be unplugged to run on the remaining battery power.
It seems the problem here isn't the capacity of the battery, but the communication between the battery and the computer.
I've tried resetting the SMC and cleaning the contacts of the battery, but neither of those had any effects.
Do I have any recourse besides trying/buying a new battery?

I have the same exact problem...totally out of the blue. You definitely don't need a new battery because my problem started couple of days after I purchased a brand new battery.
I think it might be the battery connector to the logic board. In almost all other cases with this problem, when the battery isn't recognized by the mac, then you have two of the following: it doesn't charge AND the computer doesn't run off the battery alone, even if the battery indicates that it still has juice left.
Unless instructed otherwise, I'm going to open up the computer and re-connect and clean the battery connector.
Also, do you have the updated battery software?

Firefox will not open but process runs

Suddenly I can't get Firefox to open - process runs in task manager but no window comes up at all. Have been using it on this system for a long time with no issues. It isn't the process already running issue which most of us know.
Have tried uninstalling and reinstalling Firefox to no avail. I have no other monitor connected and desktop is not extended to an imaginary monitor where it may be opening. Running on Windows Vista.
The problem started when Firefox hung / crash / froze trying to run a video applet on a website (bbc.co.uk).
Is this an issue with any kind of known resolution or must I find a new browser after years being comfortable with Firefox?

I have exactly the same problem with both Firefox and Thunderbird, under my Windows Vista OS. However, I can get both running using the following cumbersome method. In the Task Manager right click the entry firefox.exe in the process window. Choose "Properties" from the drop-down list and then choose the "Previous Versions" tab. In my case it showed a so-called "shadow copy" dated about four weeks previously and when I selected this and clicked "Open" then Firefox opened normally, though rather slowly. Unfortunately this does not solve the problem because after Firefox is closed the same problem recurs next time I try to open it. However, if the "Restore" button is available (it was not for me) in the "Previous Versions" window then you might be able to restore an older but working copy. You can also get to the "previous versions" window by right clicking the firefox.exe file in the installation folder (usually C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\ ).
This is a really unfortunate development in Firefox and Thunderbird that will force people to abandon them and move to equivalent Microsoft products that do not have these problems. Mozilla developers please act on this problem urgently.

Lexmark z22 not printing, but test prints ok..???

I have an old lexmark z22, os 10.4 9, I sww the printer, I can print test pages and all, but when I print, it shows me that its printing in the status window, then it stops. Shows the job as complete even thought the printer did nothing. find this weired because I see the printer and it does print test pages...?? Any ideas... thanks

Since the spool queue is stopping, this may be due to the 10.4.9 update. Try running a Repair Disk Permissions first of all. This is often all that is required.
If this doesn't help, download the 10.4.9 Combo update and run this. It can help replace missing files.
If that doesn't help then download a copy of Fixmac's Printer Setup Repair. It may identify what is causing the spooler to stop.

Since installing vista sp2 on sites that require popup window will not display but is running when closing out main window firefox is still running, how do I correct this.

Popup blocker is open(all popup should display), I have disabled all plugins. I have uninstalled Firefox and reinstalled 3.6.8. and still have same result.

The orange Firefox menu button is hidden by default on Windows XP.
You see the orange (on Linux gray) Firefox menu button if the Menu Bar is hidden.
* https://support.mozilla.org/kb/how-do-i-get-firefox-button
* https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Menu+bar+is+missing
You can hide or make the Menu bar visible via View > Toolbars or via Firefox > Options or right-click a toolbar.
If you need to access the hidden Menu bar then press the F10 key or tap the Alt key to make the Menu Bar appear temporarily.

Create customer date trough class cmd_ei_api - error in test run

Hi all,
I try to use class cmd_ei_api to create customer. It works fine but one thing is strange.
When I pass data with test run and customer is in a group with internal nummering system icrease number every time when i run program. Customer is not created ( that is good) but the assigned nummer is lost.
I tried to use method maintain_bapi and maintain.Problem occurs every time.
Do you have the same problem? Do you know solution of this problem?
regards,
JG
SAMPLE CODE:
report zcreate_customer.
data: wa_header          type cmds_ei_header,
      wa_central_data    type cmds_ei_vmd_central_data,
      wa_central_datax   type cmds_ei_vmd_central_data_xflag,
      wa_address         type bapiad1vl,
      wa_addressx        type bapiad1vlx,
      wa_tax_ind_st      type cmds_ei_tax_ind,
      wa_tax_ind         type cmds_ei_cmd_tax_ind,
      wa_bankdetail_st   type cvis_ei_cvi_bankdetail,
      wa_bankdetail      type cvis_ei_bankdetail,
      wa_company_code_st type cmds_ei_company,
      wa_company_code    type cmds_ei_cmd_company,
      wa_functions_st    type cmds_ei_functions,
      wa_functions_t     type CMDS_EI_FUNCTIONS_T,
      wa_functions       type cmds_ei_cmd_functions,
      wa_sales_data_st   type cmds_ei_sales,
      wa_sales_data      type cmds_ei_cmd_sales,
      wa_customer        type cmds_ei_extern,
      wa_customers       type cmds_ei_main,
      wa_correct         type cmds_ei_main,
      wa_defective       type cmds_ei_main,
      wa_mes_correct     type cvis_message,
      wa_mes_error       type cvis_message.
constants: c_update type c value 'M',
           c_insert type c value 'I'.
PARAMETERS: p_test type c as CHECKBOX DEFAULT 'X'.
start-of-selection.
free: wa_customer, wa_company_code_st, wa_customer.
wa_address-name       = 'CUSTOMER NAME'.
wa_address-city       = 'CITY'.
wa_address-postl_cod1 = '28-500'.
wa_address-street     = '1400 9TH ST W'.
wa_address-country    = 'PL'.
wa_address-langu      = 'L'.
wa_address-region     = 'FL'.
wa_address-sort1      = 'SORT1'.
wa_address-sort2      = 'Sort2'.
Assign address data directly
wa_customer-central_data-address-postal-data = wa_address.
wa_addressx-name       = 'X'.
wa_addressx-city       = 'X'.
wa_addressx-postl_cod1 = 'X'.
wa_addressx-street     = 'X'.
wa_addressx-country    = 'X'.
wa_addressx-langu      = 'X'.
wa_addressx-region     = 'X'.
wa_addressx-sort1      = 'X'.
wa_addressx-sort2      = 'X'.
wa_customer-central_data-address-postal-datax = wa_addressx.
wa_customer-central_data-central-data-ktokd = 'OKRA'.
wa_customer-central_data-central-data-STCD1 = '8291004247'.
wa_company_code_st-task           = c_insert.
wa_company_code_st-data_key-bukrs = '1000'.
wa_company_code_st-data-zuawa     = '009'.
wa_company_code_st-data-akont     = '0000201100'.
append wa_company_code_st to wa_company_code-company.
append wa_customer to wa_customers-customers.
call method cmd_ei_api=>maintain_bapi
    EXPORTING
      iv_test_run         = p_test
      iv_collect_messages = 'X'
      is_master_data      = wa_customers
    IMPORTING
      es_master_data_correct   = wa_correct
      es_message_correct       = wa_mes_correct
      es_master_data_defective = wa_defective
      es_message_defective     = wa_mes_error.
if wa_mes_error-is_error is initial and p_test is INITIAL.
    commit work AND WAIT.
else.
    ROLLBACK work.
endif.

Hi experts, I am using cmd_ei_api to create customer. Each time when I create the customer, for the customer number KUNNR, first the method picks a new number from number range, if I don't supply one in program. Then it makes the necessary checks on customer data. If data check is success, customer is created and everything is okay. But if the check is failed, no customer gets created in the Data base, but the picked number is lost forever. Is there a way to avoid this?
      The same happens, even when I ran it in Test Mode(iv_test_run = 'X'). A number is lost irrespective of whether the test run is success or not.
      I tried supplying the customer number via the program. I this case also, I had to get a number from the Number Range and supply. As the Method validates whether the supplied number belongs to the right number range, I cannot use any dummy number(not even for a Test run). Also it validates whether a customer exists in KNA1 with the supplied number.
      As a work around, now I am supplying the last number of the number range for the test run(which I have hard coded ~not a good practice!!). If this runs error free, I will pick a new number and creates the customer.
regards,
anish
sample code...
*-- Fill customer parameters to lwa_master_data
lwa_customer-header-object_instance-kunnr = '99999'.
* *** ~~
*-- Test Run with dummy customer no. for data check
    IF lwa_master_data IS NOT INITIAL.
       CALL METHOD cmd_ei_api=>maintain
         EXPORTING
           iv_test_run    = 'X'
           is_master_data = lwa_master_data
         IMPORTING
           es_error       = lwa_es_error.
*-- Create customer if Test Run Succeeds.
      IF lwa_es_error is INITIAL.
*-- Get new Customer Number
       CALL METHOD cmd_ei_api=>get_number
         EXPORTING
           iv_ktokd = as_customer-ktokd
         IMPORTING
           ev_kunnr = lv_kunnr
           es_error = lwa_getno_msg.
       IF lv_kunnr is NOT INITIAL.
*-- Supply new customer number
         CLEAR: lwa_master_data, lt_customer.
         lwa_customer-header-object_instance-kunnr = lv_kunnr.
         APPEND lwa_customer TO lt_customer.
         CLEAR lwa_customer.
         lwa_master_data-customers = lt_customer.
*-- Initialize Global and Current Customer Buffer
         CALL METHOD cmd_ei_api=>initialize.
*-- Create Customer
         CALL METHOD cmd_ei_api=>maintain
           EXPORTING
             iv_test_run    = ''
             is_master_data = lwa_master_data
           IMPORTING
             es_error       = lwa_es_error.
*-- Proceed if no error with customer creation
         IF lwa_es_error is INITIAL.
* ******************* * ******************* ~~

Net value of Credit memo must not increase, but accountingdoc must generate

HI All
This is my sales- return process
Sales order has been created for
Material : Ax001:   10 Qty : Total price : 100$   Per unit = 10$
Sales order has been created : for 10 units        (sales doc number:AAAAS)
Billing has been done : 10 units for the value 100$
Accounting documents posted : Credit :100$   Debit accout: 100$
Returns sales order:
This is done with reference to the sales order
Return Sales order has been created with reference to sales order : (sales doc number:AAAAS)
Qty :1 Value of the product =10$   Material: Ax001
A manual condition type is defined to reduce the value of the actual price .. The company is planning to give only 5$ for the return material
Manual condition has been included in the Return saels order Total net Value = 5$ qty = 1
Credit memo has been created : for 5$
Accounting doc: Credit account = 5$ debit account =5$
Issue: The account team wants one more account document to be created for the original value of the product i.e 10$
The net value in the billing document must not increase, but the account document must be created for the value=10$
This is for nullifying the original value of the product from the book of accounts
Solution tried : Manual condition for the original value =10$ keeping it as statically condition type : issue: account doc will not generate if it is statically . CND ref: 100% discount it did not work the net value in the order/billing is increasing
Please let me know how to generate the Accounting document with out increasing the net value.. Using standard SAP. we can create a routine and we can do this .. but we are looking for the Standard SAP solution if any,.....
Thanks for your help in Advance
Chandra

Hi Chandra,
In your scenario create new condition type and update that condition type with accruals at control data 2 section and create relevant access sequence and update the condition type in your return pricing procedure and create new account key one for regular posing and one for accruals and take help from FI /CO to create new two accounts one for regular updates and one for accruals posting ,
in your pricing procedure mark this condition as statistics relevant it will create automatically accountancy document for reference,
Try this and let me know if you have any questions.
Regards
Nishad

Document type not defined in lsmw idoc method

hello iam posting Open AR Line Items for contract account using message type
CTRACDOCUMENT_CREATE using lsmw idoc method .iam getting error as Document type not defined but actually when iam creating document manually item is created with out any error that means it is defined and my functional consultant is also saying he defined document type.can some body explain me what is the problem.
Regards
priya

Check OMW9, here document type is defined for the transaction MIRO..
Go to OMW9, click in the Document Type.
Then double click on MIRO.
Also check the sap notes which is referred in the similar thread Document type not defined f5814

Posting run is successful but document is not posted

Hi Experts,
I am able to run the Payroll results posting run (PC00_M99_CIPE) successfully and released. But when I check the status im getting the below Error.
"Document was not posted to accounting.
Message No 3G098."
Kindly let me know, what is the required configuration to post the document to accounting.
Regards
Raveendra.

Hi Ravendra,
You might have forgot to post the document...
First Document has to be released (Which you did)
Next you have to post the document... (Which is pending from your side)...
Tcode :- PCP0
look out for your document which is released .. You need to post it ...
Regards,
Veeram

AFAR test run showing the values but not posting in Real run.

Hi Friends,
i have an issue with AFAR recalculating the depreclation. The details are as below;
1. Asset value date is 15.07.2010. but ordinary dep. start date was set as 01.01.2010 manually by the user.
2. The Period control method 11, the dep. is calculated for entire year for acquisition.
3. we have already calculated depreciation from period 12 2010 to period 04, 2011.
4. Now, we have changed ordinary depreciation start date for 5 asset records from 01.01.2010 to 15.07.2010.
5. Therefore, we recalculated AFAR for these assets for 2010 and test run is showing the values for these 5 asset. The same was expected by the business.
6. When we execute the real run, it is not posting and no change in asset explorer for period 12, 2010 or in current period. No error message is available in spool / job log.
We have opened FI periods as well.
My question is that why the system calculating the values in test run and if it is calculated in test run, why it is not posting in update run?
As per the period control method, the depreciation should not recalculated for half year even we change the ordinary dep,start date from 1st Jan to 15th July.
I request you to clarify my doubt and help me to understand the error which is stoping the values in update run of AFAR.
Best Regards,
Padmaja

Hi,
Sorry...it is not worked out. Alternatively, i tried the shift factor with variable depreciation and i achieved the values which appeared in AFAR test run.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Padmaja
Edited by: PadmajaCH on May 19, 2011 3:26 PM

Follow-on documents are not visible in MIRO in TEST server, awsys = PRD300.

Dear Experts ,
The Test Server was refreshed around mid-June 2011 with data of
Production Server. The follow-on documents are not visible for the
invoice documents in MIRO in TEST server due to value in tables
BKPF,RBKP : field : AWSYS = PRD300 .
The newly created Purchase Orders after the refresh, the accounting
documents can be seen for the Goods Receipt (MIGO_GR-display) and
Invoice documents (MIRO).
we had already raised this issue in March & got the feedback from SAP
as shown below.
accordingly we have developed & run the program "zzlogsys2" which
updates the Logsys/Awsys field from PRD300 ( of production server ) to
that of the current server i.e. TST300 as required.
after which the FI documents for the material documents are visible in
MIGO,but follow-on documents are not visible for the invoice documents
in MIRO.
we have Checked notes 781498 and 28958 to see if the logical system is
correctly assigned , where we found that in table RBKP after entering document number, Fiscal Year , the
Field AWSYS is "PRD300" & not "TST300" as it should be. We will take up the activity of updating table RBKP
also as we are currently doing for tables MKPF & BKPF.
But to have clear picture as to what we are doing is correct , pl
advise about the following :
1) Is it a correct process done by our SAP-Basis team , that every time
any Server ( e.g. Test or Quality ) is refreshed with Production server
data, the Field AWSYS in various transaction tables gets value as
"PRD300" which then is required to replaced by running program such as
ZZlogsys.
REPORT ZZLOGSYS.
TABLES: T000, MKPF.
DATA: NEW_SYS LIKE MKPF-AWSYS.
PARAMETER: OLD_SYS LIKE MKPF-AWSYS.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM T000 WHERE MANDT EQ SY-MANDT.
NEW_SYS = T000-LOGSYS.
CHECK NOT NEW_SYS IS INITIAL.
UPDATE MKPF SET AWSYS = NEW_SYS
WHERE AWSYS = OLD_SYS.
WRITE:/ 'Number of updates: ', SY-DBCNT.
2) if the above process is correct & normal , then which are the other
tables in a particular server ,apart from tables MKPF,BKPF,RBKP , which
needs to be updated the value of field "AWSYS" in the same way
replacing value "PRD300".
3) if the process in point no. 1 is not correct , then what is the
correct process that the Basis team can do while refreshing any target
server with production data so that target server retains its value in
Field AWSYS & not showing "PRD300".
With 3 servers TEST,DEV & Quality , recently refreshed with production
server to bring all servers in Sync for a HR patch application, we have
this situation now in all 3 servers .
Thanks in advance ,
Anil Shanbhag

It is appropriate to move this thread from ERP-MM to [Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)|Enterprise Resource Planning (SAP ERP);
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Jul 7, 2011 4:56 PM

WebService - Testing in WSNavigator is not working but SOAP UI its working

Dear Experts,
I am using the URL of 'Open WSDL document for selected binding' for testing in SOAP UI from the T-Code SOAMANAGER.
I am getting the output in that tool.
But while testing the same URL using WSNavigator available in SAP gives the error like this.
"Cannot download WSDL from http://host:8000/sap/bc/srt/wsdl/client=200: It is not allowed to access this service. If you believe you should be able to, please contact your system administrator ".
I tried with the previous threads for the same issue in this forum as below,
SOAMANGER: Cannot download WSDL
But i am not getting it.
Am i need to do any settings in the WS Navigator or something else?
Kindly help me to solve the issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Ragunathan.R

Dear Trevor,
Your answer solved my issue.
BASIS need to do the settings in Visual Administrator as per the SAP Note 1394544.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Ragunathan.R

The build directory of the test run either does not exist or access permission is required.

i am trying to run automated tests
i follow the steps in the web but when i have 2 issues that does not solve
1. i created console project and add build definition without drop folder and queue builds that success.
2. i created C# unit test and add build definition and run it from VS and it worked and done what i want to do.
3. i built lab with 1 machine and define the controller on this pc ( the machine in the lab is another pc)
4. i created test suite with test cases and from vs 2013 i associated automation nethod that i created in 2.
5. when i try to associate the builds for the test plan i have a PROBLEM(1):
this happened every new build that i try to assign - all the builds appears after refresh and when i press assign to plan button
a pop up shown with error : " The build that you selected for this plan no longer exist " but he chose it in build in use but there no work item under it - the list is empty even that there are 2 tests under this test suite.
and than when i try to run the automated tests i have this PROBLEM(2):
The build directory of the test run either does not exist or access permission is required. and the test failed.
Please Help
Roey

Hi Rory,
Thank you for posting in MSDN forum.
According to the error message:
(1) a pop up shown with error : " The build that you selected for this plan no longer exist "
I tried to create a build definition without the drop folder location for unit test solution from the VS IDE, and then I try to select the Build in use option to add the Available builds, then click this Assign to plan. I found that I get same error message
with yours like the following screen shot.
However, when we try to create a build definition with drop folder location for this same unit test solution and then build successfully in the VS IDE.
After you add the Available builds and then click this Assign to plan in the MTM, it work fine.
Therefore, I assume that the issue is related to that you did not specify a build directory for automated test case. MTM need to know where is the drop location of the build building your tests.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20033217/couldnt-run-my-test-using-microsoft-test-manager
In addition, I did some research about the problem 2:"The build directory of the test run either does not exist or access permission is required. and the test failed."
I know that the error message occur in either of the following conditions:
1. The account under which test controller is running does not have read permission on the build directory. (The build directory is same as the drop location of build associated with this test run.)
2. The build directory itself does not exist.
So please refer the following blog to check this issue:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/aseemb/archive/2009/11/25/error-starting-the-test-run-build-directory-of-the-test-run-is-not-specified-or-does-not-exist.aspx
Therefore, I suggest you can try to specify a drop location for build when you run the automated test from the MTM and then check this issue.
Best Regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

I need to setup 7800 Series IP Phones in the CUCM 8.6.2 which by default are not support but will work after install the software. Anyone have document from Cisco as I remember I seen once before.

I need to setup 7800 Series IP Phones in the CUCM 8.6.2 which by default are not support but will work after install the software. Anyone have document from Cisco as I remember I seen once before.

Hi Ali,
I'll just add this reference to the good tips from my friend Manish (+5)
Support for the 7800 series in CUCM 8.6.2 was first added with this
Device Pack;
Cisco Unified Communications Manager
Device Package 8.6(2)(24104-1)Release Notes
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Device Package Release 8.6(2)
adds support for the Cisco IP Phones
7821, 7841, and 7861 running SIP firmware release 10.1(1).
The steps are in this doc
http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282074299/107528/cmterm-devicepack-8.6.2.24104-1_Readme.pdf
You might as well install the latest 8.6.2 Device pack
cmterm-devicepack8.6.2.24112-1.cop.sgn
Cheers!
Rob
"Seek it out and ye shall find "
- OneRepublic

CC 2014 nik efex - My Nik Efex filters are not working in Photoshop CC 2014 - they appear under plug-ins and seem to work, but after running and clicking okay, no new layer appears - seems to have no effect. The separate menu panel does not appear either

My Nik Efex filters are not working in Photoshop CC 2014 - they appear under plug-ins and seem to work, but after running and clicking okay, no new layer appears - seems to have no effect. The separate menu panel does not appear either. Help with this?

BINGO !!!!
Thanks so much Woodsroad. I had the exact same problem with my Dell Windows 7 64 bit with AMD Radeon 6700 Video card.
All the video tests passed with flying colors.
The sniffer rename trick fixed the problem.
Thank goodness for the internet!

Document is not cretaed but test run is successful.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for