Document management Issues with Alternate Access Mapping

hi,
I am using share-point 2010,I have done the AAM as follows:
Internal URL
Zone
Public URL for Zone
http://109.XX.XX.XX:101                      Default
http://abc.xyz.in
http://abc.xyz.in                                  Default
http://abc.xyz.in
http://MyMachineName:101                 Default
http://abc.xyz.in
http://109.XX.XX.XX:201                   Intranet
http://mn.abcsystems.com:201
http://mn.abcsystems.com:201      Intranet                          http://mn.abcsystems.com:201
http://mn.abcsystems.com:101          Internet                          http://mn.abcsystems.com:101
The http://mn.abcsystems.com:201 is extended site for reporting working properly. The site http://mn.abcsystems.com:101 works properly,But When I access site using URL http://abc.xyz.in facing following issues:
1.Default windows of share point list for adding,editing updating data not working properly...
2.filters for share-point list not populating.
3.In document Management, unable to delete & open the added document...

We have only 1 webaap that is running on specific port (consider 101)-Claim based auth
For reporting purpose we have extended our webapp on port 201 (windows auth)and this extended site on intranet zone.
For our server we have register one domain like http://mn.abcsystems.com.So it is like our server public ip address.For the same server,we have got multiple subdomain like
http://abc.xyz.in.
So we want to access our webapp by using http://abc.xyz.in. subdomain
So that why we have did
http://109.XX.XX.XX:101                   Default
http://abc.xyz.in(Subdoamin url)
http://abc.xyz.in                         Default
http://abc.xyz.in
http://MyMachineName:101                 Default
http://abc.xyz.in
http://109.XX.XX.XX:201                   Intranet
http://mn.abcsystems.com:201
http://mn.abcsystems.com:201          Intranet                          http://mn.abcsystems.com:201(extended
for Reporting purpose)
http://mn.abcsystems.com:101          Internet                          http://mn.abcsystems.com:101
For subdomain url (http://abc.xyz.in) or http://109.XX.XX.XX:101 its not working for above mentioned functionality
For domain url (http://mn.abcsystems.com:101) it work.

Similar Messages

Alternate Access Mapping Issue

This is probably pretty simple, but I can't seem to figure this one out. I have an alternate access mapping setup. I can get to
http://sharepoint, but
http://sharepoint.domain.com asks for credentials and gives me a 401 Unauthorized
message.
Where should I be looking to resolve this?

So when setting an AAM, it does not set the IIS binding. In order to set the IIS binding, you would need to remove the Web Application from the IIS site (alternatively, add the IIS binding manually).
Because you are adding a . in the URL, you will be prompted for credentials. If using NTLM, it should just go through. If using Kerberos, there will be additional steps -- so is the Web App configured with NTLM or Kerberos?
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Unknow URLs getting reported in Alternate access mapping errors

Alternate access mappings have not been configured. Users or services are accessing the site << site name >> with the URL https://cgi.im.qq.com. This may cause incorrect links to be stored or returned to users. If this is expected,
add the URL https://cgi.im.qq.com as an AAM response URL. For more information, see: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=114854"/>
Question: Now I don't know this URL but somehow I am seeing many URL like these coming once or twice during night time. Is somebody trying to do DNS Spoofing on the machine> or hacking of any sort? I did not had much help on the internet?

Hi,
This issue may be due to some users access the site with URL
https://cgi.im.qq.com or users use services to access the site with URL
https://cgi.im.qq.com.
I recommend to check if this URL has been added to the IIS(Internet Information Services) binding of the web application.
If you want to avoid such errors, you need to add the URL
https://cgi.im.qq.com to Alternate Access Mapping of the web application or remove such bindings from IIS.
More references:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/f9cfd933-58a0-4715-963a-afba54f7c720/odd-url-causing-alternative-access-mapping-warnings?forum=sharepointadminprevious
http://samirvaidya.blogspot.com/2011/03/alternate-access-mappings.html
Best regards.
Thanks
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Alternate Access Mapping not working for Zone : Intranet

One of our client want to set Alternate Access Mappint (intranet) with url "intranet.theirDomain.com" with local IP address.
is it possible?
subsequest to my previous question (
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/3f39711e-301a-40e8-aa7a-855fa2c268b1/alternate-access-mapping-not-working?forum=sharepointadmin )
I want to ask one more question
Can we configure "intranet.theirDomain.com" with local IP address for any other zone?
or
If there is ".com" within the url then it can't be configured for InTRAnet?
Thanks
S H A J A N

The names for the zones don't matter. You could use the 'extranet' zone for another intranet name if you wanted, the names are just to make it a bit more friendly for beginners.
What you describe sounds routine, you create a web application with a name, then use an AAM to allow users to access it with a more friendly name. Frequently you end up creating
http://intranet.domain.com and
http://intranet as an AAM, or vice versa.
You can use .com for an intranet site, you would need to add the site as an A Host record in your DNS server so that traffic is sent to your internal server rather than out into the wider world.

Issue with assistive access not keeping permissions

Since a recent upgrade (likely from OS X 10.9.x to 10.10.2) I've had issues with Assistive Access blocking Automator and Applescript from interaction with dialogs.
If I run my script or my Automator workflow (which basically has the same script in it) I get the error:
System Events got an error: Automator is not allowed assistive access. (in the case of Automator).
If I open Automator, and then untick and retick the Automator entry in the Accessibility options within Security & Privacy (System Preferences), then workflow can run again. It continues to work until I Quit Automator. Then it's as if OS X no longer trusts Automator to be the same app I gave Accessibility permissions to. And the situation repeats. It's much as if it were not code-signed. The exact same issue plays out with Apple Script.
I came across this info, which I hoped would solve the problem, but it made no difference: http://macscripter.net/viewtopic.php?id=43394 and http://bit.ly/1x3SRmc
In my Accessibility permissions I now have:
Script Editor
Automator
1Password 5 (which the script interacts with)
com.apple.security.agentStub.xpc (in case that's being called up and triggering the Accessibility issue)
osascript (in case that's handling the script and triggering the Accessibility issue)
SecurityAgent.xpc (in case that was triggering the Accessibility issue)
I added all these because the post at http://bit.ly/1x3SRmc indicated that anything Apple Script is interacting with needs Accessibility access permissions.
My script is as follows:
set appName to "SecurityAgent"
set passApp to "1Password 5" (* set this to the name of your password manager *)
tell application "System Events"
if not (exists window 1 of process appName) then -- test if SecurityAgent window exists
set answer to display dialog "The password dialog was not found. Please check." buttons {"Ok"}
return -- abort if SecurityAgent window does not exist
end if
end tell
tell application "System Events"
set position of window 1 of process appName to {10, 10}
-- move SecurityAgent window out of the way
end tell
activate application passApp
tell application "System Events"
tell application "SystemUIServer"
set answer to display dialog "Make sure correct 1Password item is actively selected (i.e. click it again if it was previously selected), then click “Continue” to proceed." buttons {"Continue"}
end tell
tell process passApp
(* If you are not using 1Password, you may need to change the menu item clicks, below, to whatever is correct in your particular password manager *)
click menu item "copy password" of menu "item" of menu bar 1
delay 1
set appData to the clipboard
end tell
tell application "System Events"
tell process appName
set value of text field 1 of window 1 to appData
if exists (text field 2 of window 1) then
set value of text field 2 of window 1 to appData
if exists checkbox 1 of window 1 then
if value of checkbox 1 of window 1 is 1 then
click checkbox 1 of window 1
end if
end if
set value of checkbox 1 of window 1 to 0
delay 1 (* gives a moment to see what's going on *)
click button "OK" of window 1
else
if value of checkbox 1 of window 1 is 1 then
click checkbox 1 of window 1
end if
delay 1 (* gives a moment to see what's going on *)
click button "OK" of window 1
end if
end tell
end tell
end tell
In Automator it would appear the script is generating an error as soon as it reaches line 5, "if not (exists window 1 of process appName) then"
I would greatly appreciate some assistance in resolving this issue.

Starting with Mavericks, Apple changed the way that the accessibility works (see Using AppleScript with Accessibility and Security features in Mavericks) - each individual application needs to be given access, instead of a global option. A regular AppleScript application saves properties and global variables with the script, which makes it a new application as far as the system security is concerned, so it needs to be re-added to the accessibility list. To work with this new security feature, you need to code-sign your AppleScript application or make the script(s) in the bundle read-only so that they don't get changed (note that an AppleScript-based project in Xcode does not modify the application bundle by saving properties and globals).

Alternate access mapping SP2010

Hello,
we have internal team sites based on SP2010. Now we already have 5 AAM mapping entries tied with each zone. So question is can I add one more entry to AAM? If yes then I have to used the one of the zone which alreayd used. Will that be ok?
Please help!
Thanks,

Hi,
For SharePoint Alternate Access Mapping,you need to understand the following basics:
Internal URL redirects or transforms to a
Public URL, from left, to right. The URL on the left, is what you enter in the address field in your browser, the
Public URL on the right is what you will see once there, this goes for visible and invisible links as well.
Internal URL format: Protocol + URL (+non default port)
Public URL is the address of the Web Application for one of the five zones available. The ‘Default’ must be filled out and has some special properties/uses, the other four are optional. You can only have five
Public URL’s per Web Application.
This is the URL that the browser will be redirected to in the end.
Public URL format: Protocol + URL (+non default port)
Zone is a label representing a
Public URL, the zone is used to ‘connect’ an Internal URL to a
Public URL.
Multiple internal URLs can be associated with a single public URL. Mapping collections can contain up to five authentication zones. But each zone can have only a single public URL.
So you can add multiple internal URLs mapping one zone, but each zone can have only one public URL.
Reference:
http://blog.blksthl.com/2012/12/03/a-guide-to-alternate-access-mappings-basics-in-sharepoint-2013/
https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/The-final-guide-to-551bd75b
Best Regards,
Eric
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Alternate Access Mapping Problem

I have one site that keeps giving me numerous warnings in the Event Viewer. Event 8059, SharePoint Foundation.
Alternate access mappings have not been configured. Users or services are accessing the site http://investigator.domain.com:12151 with the URL http://investigator.domain.com:12151. This may cause incorrect links to be stored or returned
to users. If this is expected, add the URL http://investigator.domain.com:12151 as an AAM response URL. For more information, see: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=114854"/>
The http://investigator.domain.com:12151 is setup as the Default Authentication Provider and http://investigator.domain.com has been extended to Intranet. This also displays in the Configure Alternate Access Mapping so it appears correct.
Yet the above error continually repeats it self.
How can I get rid of it?

what is your AAM settings are?
is this url in the AAM or not http://investigator.domain.com:12151?
Please remember to mark your question as answered &Vote helpful,if this solves/helps your problem. ****************************************************************************************** Thanks -WS MCITP(SharePoint 2010, 2013) Blog: http://wscheema.com/blog

Cannot open web address by doing Alternate Access Mapping

Dear SharePoint Expert,
I setup testing environment in internal network, I create the web&site collection by using http://demo01 (it's the machine name). I already test site, it's ok.
But when I alternate access mapping by edit internal url to common web address, It maps to http://eOffice.local
but It's show Pop-up to login. I try to login many times. It's not work, and it didn't show anything.
What happened?
Please help to suggest

Hi,
Do you mean that the credential dialgo poped up 3 times then show blank page when you log with your credential?
please try disabling loopbackcheck on your SharePoint server, then check if it could work.
http://blog.blksthl.com/2013/05/07/a-quick-guide-to-configuring-the-loopback-check/
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/896861?wa=wsignin1.0
Thanks
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Alternate Access Mapping not working

I am trying to configure alternate access mapping in sp2013.
My default url for site is https://intranet
My client has given a url https://intranet.theirDomain.com
When I ping "intranet.theirDomain.com" on their local machine it is returning IP: 192.168.0.87
When I ping "intranet", it is giving IP: 192.168.0.86
I have edited the Public Zone URL as follows
Default: https://intranet
Intranet: https://intranet.theirDomain.com
In IIS the following bindings are there.
https intranet 443 *
https intranet.theirDomain.com 443 *
But still https://intranet.theirDomain.com is not working
https://intranet is working.
I hope all are configured correctly.
Or doing any wrong? please guide me.
S H A J A N

It sounds like the 'intranet' A record in the theirDomain.com zone isn't pointed at the correct IP address (192.168.0.86).
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Issue with a graphical mapping -

Hi folks,
I have an issue with a graphical mapping.
We are replicating the Material Master, with an interface of ECC -> PI -> JDBC.
The idoc we are using is the MATMAS.MATMAS05, and in the database we created 5 tables, simulating the structure of the source idoc. The tables are: MARA, MARC, MARD, MBEW, MAKT.
The fact is that we need some data of some segments (tables) in another ones.
In this case we I need to take a value of the segment E1MARCM (MARC) to the MBEW table. The value is: SERNP.
The condition to copy that value is the centre (WERKS). So, the condition will be:
If MBEW-WERKS == MARC-WERKS,
then MBEW-SERNP = MARC-SERNP.
The problem I'm having is that I have to lookup in many different E1MARCM segments, and the relation is not 1...1, nor, E1MBEWM is a child of it (they are in the same level.)
For example there could come:
- E1MARCM_1 (WERKS = 0001)
- E1MARCM_2 (WERKS = 0002)
- E1MARCM_3 (WERKS = 0003)
- E1MBEWM_1 (WERKS = 0001)
- E1MBEWM_2 (WERKS = 0002)
- E1MBEWM_3 (WERKS = 0002)
- E1MBEWM_4 (WERKS = 0003)
- E1MBEWM_5 (WERKS = 0003)
Am I clear with the requirement?
Any answer will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
.Juan.

Hey folks, any advice or input about this?
Thanks again.
Juan

Alternate access mapping and binding in IIS for NLB nodes(2)

Hello All,
We have configured NLB for 2 nodes( 1 is App and WFE1 and 2 is WFE2).
here, we have given NLB host name to the users to browse. but, do we need to configure any thing in alternate access mapping and in IIS bindings, if yes, Please elaborate step by step please.
Thanks in advance
NLB host name and IP: abc.ap.company.com /10.11.12.95
Node1 server: abc.appri.company.com / 10.11.12.93
Node2 server: abc.appsec.company.com / 10.11.12.94
how to do this.
NARLA

Assuming you configured the web application to use the URL http://abc.ap.company.com there is no additional IIS configuration needed on the servers.
If you're interested in accessing a specific server you can create a hostfile entry on your client machine that abc.ap.company.com to one of the two servers.
Jason Warren
@jaspnwarren
jasonwarren.ca
habaneroconsulting.com/Insights

Colour Management Issue with PS CS3 and Leopard 10.5.2

Hi Everyone,
Since I have installed Leopard I am having colour management issues with Photoshop CS3 and my Canon i9950 printer.
My screen is calibrated with a Spyder and I used to ask Photoshop (in 10.4.11) to manage colour when printing and used the Spyder profile. Everything came out as I saw it on screen.
Now in leopard when I do the same thing everything comes out too yellow on the print. If I ask Photoshop to let the printer manage the colour it is too red. If I use the default colour management (photoshop managing the colour and it choosing the colour space it is better, but still too yellow).
Photoshop gives the hint to turn off colour management in the printer but there is no option for this and it also said the same thing before of course (when it worked in 10.4.11).
Any ideas?
Thanks.

>It was working perfectly in Tiger with the monitor profile.
You were lucky.
the monitor profile is so Photoshop can display your images correctly.
the working space is Adobe RGB, sRGB, BruceRGB, ect... these are all known color spaces so when the file goes to another computer there is a consistent color space for reference. If you use your monitor profile as a working space then nobody else knows what is going on with your file.
when you print you need to use the printer profile for the type of paper you are printing on this is supplied by the printer manufacturer. you can also have custom profiles made.
you need to read up on color management:
http://www.gballard.net/psd.html
http://digitaldog.net/

Colour Management issue With Leopard and PS CS3

Hi Everyone,
Since I have installed Leopard I am having colour management issues with Photoshop CS3 and my Canon i9950 printer.
My screen is calibrated with a Spyder and I used to ask Photoshop (in 10.4.11) to manage colour when printing and used the Spyder profile. Everything came out as I saw it on screen.
Now in leopard when I do the same thing everything comes out too yellow on the print. If I ask Photoshop to let the printer manage the colour it is too red. If I use the default colour management (photoshop managing the colour and it choosing the colour space it is better, but still too yellow).
Photoshop gives the hint to turn off colour management in the printer but there is no option for this and it also said the same thing before of course (when it worked in 10.4.11).
Any ideas?
Thanks.

You need to use the correct printer profile for the paper you're using. If the printer didn't come with any pre-built profiles, check Canon's web site to see if they have any profiles available for your printer that you can download.
Printer profiles are very specific. You can't take take a profile for glossy Epson paper and expect it to work very well for Canon glossy paper.

Colour Management Issues with Leopard and Photoshop CS3

Hi Everyone,
Since I have installed Leopard I am having colour management issues with Photoshop CS3 and my Canon i9950 printer.
My screen is calibrated with a Spyder and I used to ask Photoshop (in 10.4.11) to manage colour when printing and used the Spyder profile. Everything came out as I saw it on screen.
Now in leopard when I do the same thing everything comes out too yellow on the print. If I ask Photoshop to let the printer manage the colour it is too red. If I use the default colour management (photoshop managing the colour and it choosing the colour space it is better, but still too yellow).
Photoshop gives the hint to turn off colour management in the printer but there is no option for this and it also said the same thing before of course (when it worked in 10.4.11).
Any ideas?
Thanks.

I'm having exactly the same problem, only my printer is a Canon Pixma iX4000. The colour is all bleached out, it looks exactly like when you've accidentally printed an RGB file on a CMYK printer, and at first I thought that was what I had done, but it isn't. This is very frustrating, I've spent all day going through the manuals, recalibrating etc, but no luck. This is a brand new Mac Pro and printer, but if its not going to print what I see on screen it's just expensive junk.
I wasn't sure if the problem was Leopard or the printer or CS3...

Site Collection Alternate Access Mapping

I have 1 web application with 2 site collections.
Web Application url - http://contoso.bc.com.au
Host named Site Collection 1 - http://contoso1.bc.com.au
Host named Site Collection 2 - http://contoso2.bc.com.au
All 3 use the same custom masterpage with navigation in the top bar to go to each site.
In my Event Logs, I see this error
Alternate access mappings have not been configured. Users or services are accessing the site http://contoso.bc.com.au with the URL http://contoso2.bc.com.au. This may cause incorrect links to be stored or returned to users. If this is expected,
add the URL http://contoso2.bc.com.au as an AAM response URL.
I don't get the error with http://contoso1.bc.com.au
My current alternate access mappings
http://contoso.bc.com.au Default
https://contoso.bc.com.au Internet
How can I fix this?
Thank you
Yoshi

Hi Yoshi,
This issue seems to be about the host-named site collection 2. Please make sure that after you created the new hostname site collection 2, you had mapped it to a specific zone.
There are some articles for configuring host-named site collections, please take a look at:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc424952(v=office.15).aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/russmax/archive/2013/10/31/guide-to-sharepoint-2013-host-name-site-collections.aspx
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

Document management Issues with Alternate Access Mapping

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for