Document parked not posting, approved by manager not posting

Hi experts,
Document parked not posting, approved by manager not posting.Could you please assist us ASAP.
Thanks & Best regards
Sreenivas

Hi Srini,
To post the parked document you can use the Transaction FBV0. If workflow is involved in the process check with your workflow consultant to know the status and rerun/trigger the workflow manually according to your requirement.
Warm regards,
Murukan Arunachalam

Similar Messages

FSRM Service not running and Quota Management not working in Server 2008 R2

Hi,
First of all, I would like to start from beginning. I installed File Server Resource Manager in our Windows Server 2008 R2. We were especially using it for Quota Management. And we aren't using C drive but instead F drive (different volume) for quota management.
Suddenly one day, it stopped working therefore, I assumed that maybe if I restart it would have worked but unlike Linux which usually works, it didn't work. Now I can't get my File Server Resource Manager to start.The error which I get can be seen below:-
File Server Resource Manager Service error: Unexpected error.
Operation:
   Checking the File Server Resource Manager global configuration store.
   Starting File Server Resource Manager Service.
Error-specific details:
   Error: CGlobalStoreManager::Install(), 0x80070005, Access is denied.
I did some research and there were very limited results but none of them worked.
I tried going into System Volume Information on both C drive and F drive. I tried going inside
SRM folder removing quota.xml and readding but to no avail. Finally, I removed the
File Server Role and reinstalled but it didn't really work. I still have the same problem.

Hi,
My first thought is also "System Volume Information" folder. So let's try the following steps again to make sure that it is fully tested.
Run the following commands. You can copy to a BAT file instead of manually run all commands:
cd \
takeown /r /F "System Volume Information" /D Y
icacls "System Volume Information" /grant Administrator:(F)
cd "System Volume Information"
takeown /r /F srm /D Y
icacls srm /grant system:(F)
cd srm
takeown /f quota.xml
icacls quota.xml /grant System:(F)
takeown /f settings
icacls settings /grant system:(F)
cd settings
takeown /f reportsettings.xml
takeown /f srmglobalsettings.xml
icacls reportsettings.xml /grant System:(F)
icacls srmglobalsettings.xml /grant System:(F)
icacls srmglobalsettings.xml /grant System:(F)
cd ..
icacls reports /grant System:(F) /inheritance:e /T /C
icacls reports/* /grant System:(F) /T
Then reboot and see the result.
If issue still exists, check if SYSTEM and local Administrators group have Full Control permission on all these folders:
C:\windows\tasks
C:\system volume information\srm
C:\windows\system32\srm
If you have any feedback on our support, please send to [email protected]

925685 - Approval process is not triggered after documents are added

Hi there,
I was wondering if anyone found already a solution for the following problem.
According to SAP Note: 925685 - Approval process is not triggered after documents are added.
Within our SAP application, we want to approve purchase orders for departments based upon the document total.
I was very astonished that employees are able to add a PO which will not trigger an approval stage and after the document is added, they have the possibility to change the document and at the update moment no approval will be started even if the document meets the approval requirements.
Therefore I really want the flexibility to give users the possibility to change their PO.
Meanwhile, documents which are added under approval, are also locked for changes, although this is another question it is also pretty annoying!
I hope anyone has already found a method or work around for the stated problems above.
(We are using SAP 8.8 PL 20)
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
Marcel

Hi Kambadasan,
Thank you for your reply
I'm sorry but I know how the approval templates work and they are configured correctly, however as SAP also mentioned in their own Note, this is due to the lack of SBO that SAP has such behaviour.
Hi Gordon,
Thanks for your reply.
Unfortunately I have not found the post you mentioned...
I will post my issue alson on the topic you mentioned.
Hopefully they found a solution or maybe version 8.81 will solve the problem.
Thanks a lot!!
Kind regards,
Marcel

Issue With Notes for Approval

Hi SRM Gurus,
The problem we have with "Notes for Approval" at the bottom of SC is whenever some one adds a Note to this section it is not getting properly aligned for example see below for how finally all notes look like after Notes being added by Approvers
Notes for Approval
This is Notes Test3:
This is the Note from :AOGRAN On 27.02.2008:
FHANK On 02/26/2008:
CBRITT On 02/26/2008:
In the above CBRITT has added the first line "This is Notes Test3: " but the note is shown at the beginning and his ID and time stamp are at the bottom.
Is there any way, both can be combined together in one line side by side ??

Hi Swati,
Looks like the template was modified beforw I started working on it.I compared the template code in dvelopment with previous version and found some lines were missing , copied the missing lines and now it is working fine.
Thanks a lot for the help,
Anubhav

Document parking is not defined for special G/L transactions

Dear All,
I want to post a document with a special G/L indicator in F-65 . But I got an error message FP030 - Document parking can not be carried out .
Is anyone to got this message ?
Thanks
Dash

Dear Erdif,
this is right, you can not make document parking for down payments and bills of exchange.
But It is possible for Sp.GL indicators with Sp.GL transaction type "OTHERS" (look in FBKP select SPGL indicators and select button Proporties)
Best Regards
Your error message should be same like this below one:
Special G/L transactions not defined for bills/exch.and down pmnts
Message no. FP030
Diagnosis
You have selected a posting key with a special G/L indicator of type 'Bill of exchange', or 'Down payment'. Document parking is not defined for special G/L transactions of the type 'Bill of exchange' or 'Down payment'.
System response
Document parking cannot be carried out.
Procedure
Select a different posting key or special G/L indicator. If the posting is a 'One-time posting' to a rent contract, select a different transaction type or post the document directly.

DRQ# Approval Process Does Not Fire on Update of Document

Hi,
If a purchase order is added for a value which does not require approval, then later the actual price of the order is known and is a value which requires approval, the user is able to update the purchase order without an approval procedure being triggered.
Note #925685 states that approvals will not trigger on update, however this means a user can modify documents to a value which should require an approval process.
Lianne

Hi Lianne and Davis,
I was wondering if you already found a solution for this problem.
Unfortunately I did not found your post about the approval process.
( Re: 925685 - Approval process is not triggered after documents are added )
Do you know if this is solved within 8.81 or did you find another solution?
Kind regards,
Marcel Kieboom

Collections Management - Notes Stored at Document Level

Hello everyone,
I am working Collections Management in SAP ECC 6.0, EHP1. I am wondering if it is possible to add notes to specific documents while in the Process Receivables screen. I know that Dispute Cases or Promises to Pay allow this functionality, but I am wondering if it is possible without creating one of those case types.
If this isn't possible, are there any user exits that will allow it?
Thanks,
Jason

Jason,
In short the answer is no.
What sort of notes are you looking to hold?
You are right you could create a P2P or a Dispute to add notes.
Against the a/c document, you could look to add some notes in the "service for object" part of the document.
Then when you drill into the document, you will be able to see the notes.

Document Contains Errors. Approval is not Possible.

I have a SC approval that errored out when coming back to SRM. We run RBBP_OFFLINE_EVAL program periodically throughout the day to pick up offline approvals from users. In the spool list, I see this message:
Document Contains Errors. Approval is not Possible. And the system gives me the WI ID, SC # and the object type BUS2121.
I've never seen such an error before. The document here...is it referring to the approval email itself? We instruct our users to not edit the approval email in any way. They just have to click on the approval link and click on Send in Outlook. I don't know if the document it's referring to is the SC or the approval email.
Can anyone help?
SN

Hi,
You are right. This error is the issue. To answer your other question why this message was not raised earlier;the problem could be that at the time of sc creation, there might be sufficient budget. But because your shopping cart was in approval for some time, it is possible that some more shopping carts have been raised with the same WBS and got approved. This would reduce the overall budget available. When the shopping cart is approved, one more check is done by the system and this time there was no sufficient budget.Hence the error is displayed. Only option for you now would be to ask FI people to increase budget or resubmit the cart by changing the value of the shopping cart.
Regards,
Sanjeev

Approved invoices can not be edited - Approval process

Hi Experts -
I have recently raised an incident with SAP about Approval process - the complete message and support reply is as follows - but i believe we need a change in the approval process - if the approval required is only one but you have defined two people (Either or OR) in the approver list - the system should allow the document to be edited if one of the approvers reject it.
please let me know and i believe we need a change in design - unless otherwise a solid reason is given to justify the existing design
10.07.2009 10:32 Description (English) by SRS Manian
     We have created approval procedure for all the invoices which are entered into the system., The
'Accts' user enters the invoice into the system - the invoice comes for approval to 'Manager' user.
When the Manager opens the invoice via Alert window - he/she wants to modify certain information
(lines as well as Sales person) and approve it.
The invoice which gets opened from the alert window - does not allow the user 'Manager' to modify at
all. All the information on the invoice are greyed out.
The system should allow the user 'Manager' to modify the information. Since the manager has full
authorization to the system.
10.07.2009 10:35 Info to Reporter by SAP
     Dear Partner/Customer,
We have received your inquiry and are currently processing it.
You will be contacted with a solution or an update as soon as possible.
For further details regarding the phase your message is in at the
moment please refer to:
http://service.sap.com/%7Esapidb/011000358700000575782007E
Kind regards,
SAP Business One Product Support
10.07.2009 10:59 Reply to Reporter by SAP
     Dear Manian,
Thank you for contacting us.
When the originator sends the document for manager's approval, note that the at that stage, the document is still in the 'Approval Process'. This is because the system is waiting for the 'Manager' to 'Approve or Reject' the document. Hence, looking at the Document, it is still in 'Draft - Pending' Status.
When the document is in 'Draft-Pending' Status, the document is not available for editing, because the system considers that it is still in the waiting process. In your case, the manager cannot edit t he document.
To amend the document, an action is required from the approver either to reject it first. Once rejected, it can be amended and re-sent for approval.
I have checked our knowledge base and noted that there is an article which describes the approval process. Please refer to the Expert on Phone Wiki Article (March 2009) with title: Why a draft documen t in an approval process cannot be modified by the originator?
The link will provide the explanation:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/pages/viewpage.action&pageid=88735894
I have also attached Notes 1321234 and 1111431 for your reference.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
10.07.2009 11:59 Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
     Thanks for the reply. The scenario is when the Manager receives the
document for approval, he wanted to edit and add it. Your reply (and
documentations) states that it needs to be rejected first before it is
available for editing. When it is gets rejected - the person who
orignated the document gets an alert and he can edit it. Here the
Manager must get an alert so that he can edit the Rejected document.
When the 'manager' rejects the document, and goes back to the alert
window to open the document - it is still greyed out !!
How does the 'manager' reject the document and edits it ?
regards
Manian
10.07.2009 12:11 Reply to Reporter by SAP
     Dear Manian,
If after the Manager rejects it and still the document is not editable (greyed out), it means that the document may still be in the 'Approval Process'. When it is greyed out, what is the status of the document in the header? Does it say 'Rejected' or 'Pending'?
If it is still in 'Pending' mode, please verify the number of 'Approvers' set in the 'Stages' tab of the 'Approval Template - Setup' window. If there is more than one user listed as 'Approver', and o nly 1 approval is required, the system provides an opportunity to other 'Approvers' to approve or reject the document. If in your case, the number of approvers is 2, and manager 'rejected' it, the sys tem still keeps the document in Pending status as it waits for another approver's decision to reject or approve it.
Also, verify the number of 'Approvals' required. If the number of 'Approvers' who have not rendered their decision is greater than or equal to the 'Approvals' required (e.g. approvers - 2, required ap provals - 2) the system keeps the document within the approval process. This is to allow the other 'Approvers' to decide on the document.
I hope this clarifies the behaviour. If you can provide us a step by step screenshot of the issue, this may help us to provide a more accurate response.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
10.07.2009 12:28 Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
     Hi:
The status of the document in the Header says 'Pending' and the status
below the document number says 'Suspended' - it is not showing as 'Draft'
Regards
Manian
10.07.2009 12:42 Call to Customer / Partner by SAP
     Performed on: 10.07.2009 10:41:59 (UK)
Contact person: SRS Manian
Status of discussion: Customer not reached
Subject:
Called the partner but currently engaged on another line.
Would like to hold a webex.
10.07.2009 12:42 Reply to Reporter by SAP
     Dear Manian,
I'm trying to call you but there was no response on your mobile.
When the header says 'Pending', then it means the document is still within the approval process. Please check the Approval Template and see the number of approvers and the number of approvals require d.
The number of approvals and approvers may be greater than 1. In this case, the system waits for other approvers to approve or reject the document. Once all the approvers have rejected the document, th en the document will be released and available for editing.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
10.07.2009 18:11 Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
     Hi:
Thanks for the reply - i tried this and found out the following:
1 - In the approval templates - we had mentioned number of approvals
required as '1'.
2 - in the number of approvers - we had mentioned two users
Though the template requires only one approvals (Either or OR) the system
expects both of them to approve or reject -
Can u please let me why is this behaving like this - or is this is the
way it is designed ? - if this is the way it is designed - i beleive it
is wrong - weneed to give a solution to the customer
regards
Manian
11.07.2009 05:52 Reply to Reporter by SAP
     Dear Manian,
Thank you for the information. The behaviour is a current system definition documented as per Note 1321234. I have attached the said Note for your reference. When only 1 approval is required and there are 2 or more persons are allowed to approve the document, the document does not get automatically rejected when 1 person 'rejects' it. The system waits for other approvers to render their decision b ecause a person may still approve or reject the document.
The design is not an application error. If you would like to change this design, please post your requirement in our SAP Business One Product Development Collaboration
forum. You can find the forum in this link:
/community [original link is broken]
The forum is beingmoderated by members of the Solution Management team specialized in certain areas, according to the folder you are in. Partners can impact the design of specific features by posting suggestions and feedback at this forum. Kindly refer to Note 1028874 which describes more on the above process.
As the request will be handled through another process, we kindly request that this support message be closed.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
SAP Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
11.07.2009 09:02 Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
     Hi Thanks for the reply - however, the solution given doesnot address the
problem we are beingfaced with our client
Is there a Development Request we can raise so that this problem is
addressed in future
I am going ahead and confirming this Message though
regards
Manian
11.07.2009 10:04 Reply to Reporter by SAP
     Dear Manian,
Thanks for the information. I understand the customer's requirement. As previously mentioned, please log a development request in this link:
/community [original link is broken] This is from Note 1028874.
Unfortunately,we at the support centre does not have access to the list of development requests. Hence, kindly follow the process in Note 1028874.
I'm sending the message back to your side for confirmation.
Best regards,
Lorna Real
Support Consultant
Product Support for SAP Business One
SAP Ireland
SAP Notes
Number     Short text
0001035200
Issue can be solved via existing documentation
0001111431
Deleting rejected draft documents.
0001167635
Maintenance Policy (L)
0001321234
Status of a document rejected within the Approval Process.

Hi Gordon - thanks for the reply - i am sorry i never realized that the message i raised could be messed up like this - the following is a clear message with some paragraphs:
Hi Experts - I have recently raised an incident with SAP about Approval process - the complete message and support reply is as follows - but i believe we need a change in the approval process - if the approval required is only one but you have defined two people (Either or OR) in the approver list - the system should allow the document to be edited if one of the approvers reject it. please let me know and i believe we need a change in design - unless otherwise a solid reason is given to justify the existing design
SRS Manian We have created approval procedure for all the invoices which are entered into the system., The 'Accts' user enters the invoice into the system - the invoice comes for approval to 'Manager' user. When the Manager opens the invoice via Alert window - he/she wants to modify certain information (lines as well as Sales person) and approve it. The invoice which gets opened from the alert window - does not allow the user 'Manager' to modify at all. All the information on the invoice are greyed out. The system should allow the user 'Manager' to modify the information. Since the manager has full authorization to the system.
Reply to Reporter by SAP Dear Manian,
Thank you for contacting us. When the originator sends the document for manager's approval, note that the at that stage, the document is still in the 'Approval Process'. This is because the system is waiting for the 'Manager' to 'Approve or Reject' the document. Hence, looking at the Document, it is still in 'Draft - Pending' Status. When the document is in 'Draft-Pending' Status, the document is not available for editing, because the system considers that it is still in the waiting process. In your case, the manager cannot edit t he document. To amend the document, an action is required from the approver either to reject it first. Once rejected, it can be amended and re-sent for approval. I have checked our knowledge base and noted that there is an article which describes the approval process. Please refer to the Expert on Phone Wiki Article (March 2009) with title: Why a draft documen t in an approval process cannot be modified by the originator? The link will provide the explanation:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/pages/viewpage.action&pageid=88735894
I have also attached Notes 1321234 and 1111431 for your reference. Best regards, Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland 10.07.2009 11:59
Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Thanks for the reply.
The scenario is when the Manager receives the document for approval, he wanted to edit and add it. Your reply (and documentations) states that it needs to be rejected first before it is available for editing. When it is gets rejected - the person who orignated the document gets an alert and he can edit it. Here the Manager must get an alert so that he can edit the Rejected document. When the 'manager' rejects the document, and goes back to the alert window to open the document - it is still greyed out !! How does the 'manager' reject the document and edits it ? regards Manian
Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian, If after the Manager rejects it and still the document is not editable (greyed out), it means that the document may still be in the 'Approval Process'. When it is greyed out, what is the status of the document in the header? Does it say 'Rejected' or 'Pending'? If it is still in 'Pending' mode, please verify the number of 'Approvers' set in the 'Stages' tab of the 'Approval Template - Setup' window. If there is more than one user listed as 'Approver', and o nly 1 approval is required, the system provides an opportunity to other 'Approvers' to approve or reject the document. If in your case, the number of approvers is 2, and manager 'rejected' it, the sys tem still keeps the document in Pending status as it waits for another approver's decision to reject or approve it. Also, verify the number of 'Approvals' required. If the number of 'Approvers' who have not rendered their decision is greater than or equal to the 'Approvals' required (e.g. approvers - 2, required ap provals - 2) the system keeps the document within the approval process. This is to allow the other 'Approvers' to decide on the document. I hope this clarifies the behaviour. If you can provide us a step by step screenshot of the issue, this may help us to provide a more accurate response.
Best regards,
Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland
Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Hi: The status of the document in the Header says 'Pending' and the status below the document number says 'Suspended' - it is not showing as 'Draft'
Regards
Manian 10.07.2009 12:42
Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian,
I'm trying to call you but there was no response on your mobile. When the header says 'Pending', then it means the document is still within the approval process. Please check the Approval Template and see the number of approvers and the number of approvals require d. The number of approvals and approvers may be greater than 1. In this case, the system waits for other approvers to approve or reject the document. Once all the approvers have rejected the document, th en the document will be released and available for editing.
Best regards,
Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland
Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Hi: Thanks for the reply - i tried this and found out the following: 1 - In the approval templates - we had mentioned number of approvals required as '1'. 2 - in the number of approvers - we had mentioned two users Though the template requires only one approvals (Either or OR) the system expects both of them to approve or reject - Can u please let me why is this behaving like this - or is this is the way it is designed ? - if this is the way it is designed - i beleive it is wrong - weneed to give a solution to the customer
regards
Manian
Reply to Reporter by SAP
Dear Manian,
Thank you for the information. The behaviour is a current system definition documented as per Note 1321234. I have attached the said Note for your reference. When only 1 approval is required and there are 2 or more persons are allowed to approve the document, the document does not get automatically rejected when 1 person 'rejects' it. The system waits for other approvers to render their decision because a person may still approve or reject the document.
The design is not an application error. If you would like to change this design, please post your requirement in our SAP Business One Product Development Collaboration forum.
You can find the forum in this link:
/community [original link is broken]
The forum is being moderated by members of the Solution Management team specialized in certain areas, according to the folder you are in. Partners can impact the design of specific features by posting suggestions and feedback at this forum.
Kindly refer to Note 1028874 which describes more on the above process.
As the request will be handled through another process, we kindly request that this support message be closed. Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
Lorna Real Support Consultant SAP Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland
Reply to Support Center by SRS Manian
Hi Thanks for the reply - however, the solution given does not address the problem we are being faced with our client Is there a Development Request we can raise so that this problem is addressed in future I am going ahead and confirming this Message though
regards
Manian
Reply to Reporter by SAP Dear Manian,
Thanks for the information. I understand the customer's requirement. As previously mentioned, please log a development request in this link:
/community [original link is broken]
This is from Note 1028874.
Unfortunately, we at the support centre does not have access to the list of development requests. Hence, kindly follow the process in Note 1028874. I'm sending the message back to your side for confirmation.
Best regards,
Lorna Real Support Consultant Product Support for SAP Business One SAP Ireland

A device which is not part of this management group has attempted to access this Health Service.

Has anyone found an answer to this yet? I have uninstalled/reinstalled the agents both manually and through the push. Rebooted the client, rebooted the sce server. Forced the group policy to reapply, forced the health agent to /reportnow and I still get the error. The client shows up under the agent managed section but under the health state column it shows not monitored. The clients can ping the SCE server by FQDN and RDP to it as well so name resolution is working fine.
On the the SCE server I get this in the log
Event Type: Information
Event Source: OpsMgr Connector
Event Category: None
Event ID: 20000
Date:  6/25/2009
Time:  10:09:40 AM
User:  N/A
Computer: *******
Description:
A device which is not part of this management group has attempted to access this Health Service.
Requesting Device Name : *****
And this
Event Type:            Information
Event Source:           OpsMgr Connector
Event Category:       None
Event ID: 21042
Date:                        6/25/2009
Time:                       10:25:14 AM
User:                        N/A
Computer:                ***********
Description:
Operations Manager has discarded 1 items in management group Servername_MG, which came from $$ROOT$$. These items have been discarded because no valid route exists at this time. This can happen when new devices are added to the topology but the complete topology has not been distributed yet. The discarded items will be regenerated.
On the client I get
Event Type: Error
Event Source: OpsMgr Connector
Event Category: None
Event ID: 20070
Date:  06/25/2009
Time:  10:06:13 AM
User:  N/A
Computer: ******
Description:
The OpsMgr Connector connected to ****** but the connection was closed immediately after authentication occured. The most likely cause of this error is that the agent is not authorized to communicate with the server, or the server has not received configuration. Check the event log on the server for the presence of 20000 events, indicating that agents which are not approved are attempting to connect.
And this as well
Event Type:            Error
Event Source:           OpsMgr Connector
Event Category:       None
Event ID: 21016
Date:                        06/25/2009
Time:                       10:06:18 AM
User:                        N/A
Computer:                ******
Description:
OpsMgr was unable to set up a communications channel to **** and there are no failover hosts. Communication will resume when ******* is both available and allows communication from this computer.
And this
OpsMgr has no configuration for management group Servername_MG and is requesting new configuration from the Configuration Service.

Hey Nathan,
Yea I have sent the script to eveyone that has aked for it. I dont know if its helped anybody else as none has given me any feedback either way.
I guess I can post it here for everyone to use.
Please keep in mind that if you use this script from MS its at your own risk, If your DB blows up, massive catastrophic failure ensues and so forth ITS YOUR OWN FAULT. MAKE SURE YOU HAVE GOOD BACKUPS
Step 1) Run this against your SCE 2007 DB
DECLARE @BaseManagedEntityInternalId int
DECLARE @BaseManagedEntityId uniqueidentifier
DECLARE @ViewName sysname
DECLARE @Statement nvarchar(max)
SET @BaseManagedEntityInternalId = 0
WHILE EXISTS (SELECT * FROM BaseManagedEntity WHERE (BaseManagedEntityInternalId >
@BaseManagedEntityInternalId))
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1
@BaseManagedEntityInternalId = bme.BaseManagedEntityInternalId
,@BaseManagedEntityId = bme.BaseManagedEntityId
,@ViewName = met.ManagedTypeViewName
FROM BaseManagedEntity bme
JOIN ManagedType met ON (bme.BaseManagedTypeId = met.ManagedTypeId)
WHERE (bme.BaseManagedEntityInternalId > @BaseManagedEntityInternalId)
AND (bme.IsDeleted = 0)
ORDER BY BaseManagedEntityInternalId
SELECT @Statement = 'IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM ' + QUOTENAME(@ViewName) + '
WHERE BaseManagedEntityId = ''' + CAST(@BaseManagedEntityId AS varchar(50)) + ''')
PRINT ''' + CAST(@BaseManagedEntityId AS varchar(50)) + ' ' + @ViewName + ''''
EXECUTE(@Statement)
END
STEP 2)
If your problem was the same a mine you should get some GUID’s returned. (For example 93790c0B-09C4-3A4D-CE72-F4E3Dd917D78 MTV_DeploymentSettings)
Using the GUID that we got in the output file
Execute the below given query:
==========================
select fullname
from basemanagedentity
where basemanagedentityid = ‘<GUID>’
==========================
Verify that the device or the object mentioned in the above output is not displayed in Operations console.
Only in case if the object is not displayed then use the below given query to delete it from database.
==========================
update basemanagedentity
set isdeleted = 1
where basemanagedentityid = ‘<GUID>’
==========================
Before executing the above query please ensure that you have the backup of the database. Also note that you need to run the above said query only incase if you do not see the object in the Operations console.
After executing this query, run this stored procedure:
==========================
exec p_Detectandfixinstancespaceinconsistencies
==========================
Once it is done:
> Stop all the three OpsMgr services: health, Config and SDK on Management Server
> Cleared the health service state folder.
> Start all the three OpsMgr services: SDK, Config, and health on Management Server.
> Wait for 30 minutes and see if the agents start getting monitored.
I hope this helps everyone

Non PO documents parked in FV60 cannot be posted through FBV0.

Hi,
I am trying to post a document parked through FV60 in FBV0 Tcode, but the system says that the document is already posted in that compnay code even though it is in parked condition.. I tried posting some other parked documents but the system is showing the same error. It is only happening to documents parked through FV60. The documents parked though FV50 can be posted.
Can anybody help me solve this issue.
Thanks,
Vardhana Reddy.

Please check the database of deriving the actual state of the document.
Check the table VBKPF and VBSEG whether the entry is there in the database of not.
Unless and until we get to know the state of document at the data base level , it would be difficult to comment.
Cheers,
Dewang

Error in documents parking and posting

Hello,
After I parked the document of vendor payment using F-65 , While I validate and post the documents using FBV0 I met a error as following:
" Formatting error in the field BSEG-PRCTR; see next message
Message no. 00298
Diagnosis
During batch input or when executing CALL TRANSACTION... USING a screen field was filled with an invalid input format.
System Response
Processing was terminated.
Procedure
The screen field has the technical name BSEG-PRCTR . The cause of the error is described in the following message.
Correct the appropriate BDC data."
How can i add the field profit center in F-65 of in FBV0 while posting the parked document ?
Thanks

Hi Tarek
at first please check field status transaction with OB14, OB41.
Please also check in transaction OBC4 for the relevant field status variant and the relevant field status group in "Additional account assignments" that "Profit center is not set as required.
do you have an asset line inside the document ?
When a classicaly parked document or a document parked by the complex posting via ENJOY is posted, a CALL TRANSACTION USING is run through. It can be compared with a batch-input session in the background.
If a document is parked with an asset line, it might be that in the asset line account assignments were derived by parking the document, although they are not open for entry. For making sure, that the CALL TRANSACTION USING is not failing for such lines, the settings of the asset accounting have to be disregarded and the fields have to be opend.
Then only the fieldstatus of posting key and G/L account are regarded. Since the fieldstatus of PRCTR is defined as required, the posting fails. If it was optional, everything would have worked properly.
Kindly revise your field status customizing
Kind Regards
davide

SP2010 Designer workflow "Set Content Approval Status" does not work

Hello
I'm having a problem with a workflow for one of my clients.It is a SharePoint 2010 environment and I can only use SharePoint 2010 designer (no visual studio).
We have an approval workflow in place, which works great. After the document approval workflow has does its thing, a new workflow can be launged by specific users (they have writing rights and can approve content). The workflow is used to set the release
date of the document. This can only be determined after content approval.
However, when the release date is set, the document approval status is changed to concept. This is of course to be expected, as we changed to document metadata. That is why I wanted to add the action "Set content approval" to this workflow. I cannot
seem to get this action to work. Right now the workflow does the following:
check out the document (check out is obligatory in our library)
set the release date field to the released date parameter (defined when starting the workflow)
check in the document
set content approval to approved.
The release date gets set to the parameter value, but the document is not checked in and the content approval status is not set. SharePoint produces the following error message (translated from Dutch): "An error occured. Cannot edit the item, possibly
because one or more columns require another type of content. Unknown error."
Guided by other posts online I gathered that this might be because the actions checkin and set content approval occur to close together. I tried letting the workflow pause for the duration of 1 minute after checking in, but this pauses the workflow indefinitely.
I then tried 5 minutes (as this is the time standard set by SP2010 designer) but this also resulted in indefinite pausing.
Posts online lead me to believe that I'm not the only suffering from this problem, but as of yet, I haven't been able to find a solution that works for me. Hopefully someone can help me.

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that the "Set Content Approval Status" didn’t work in SharePoint 2010 Designer workflow.
I try to reproduce the issue and the result is the same as yours.
If I only check out and check in the item, the workflow works well.
However, once I set Content Approval Status after checking in the item, the workflow get error.
As a workaround, I recommend to use two workflow to achieve what you want.
First, create the first workflow, and allow the workflow to be manually started.
Then, create the second workflow, and
start the workflow automatically when an item is changed.
When you start the first workflow, the document will be set value of the release date. And then the second workflow will be started automatically to set the content approval status.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Approval preview not displaying approval details in 'Check Status'

Hi All,
I am facing an issue in the below scenario:-
First a requestor creates an Advice Special Request Form which goes to a purchaser for approval. The purchaser rejects this item and adds a new item by creating a special request form and fills in correct details. While he does this, the cost assignment for the items is different(multiple cost center assignment). Then he approves this Shopping cart. When the requestor Accepts the Changes, he is not able to view the approver details. But once he clicks on change option, then the approval details are shown in the approval preview.
Is there any way that the approval details are shown when the user clicks on the 'Approval preview' as the SC has already gone for approval to the manager? Is there any particular reason why only in change mode he can see the approval details?

Dear Poster,
As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
Best Regards,
SDN SRM Moderation Team

"Ask to buy" and "Sign in to Approve" process is not working

Last weekend I setup Family Sharing for the first time, but the "Ask to buy" and "Sign in to Approve" process is not working. I am the Family Organizer and I created an account for my child under 13 with "Ask to buy" enabled. My child can go in to the App Store, click "Buy" for a desired app and I get a notification on my iPhone 5s... as expected. When I open the Notification I have the option to Decline or Approve. If I select Approve, a box pops up asking me to enter the password for my child's iCloud account to complete the request. (It seems odd to me that I'd have to enter his password instead of my own, but whatever.) So I enter his password and the box goes away for a second and then comes right back like I typed it wrong or something. I enter it again and again and always the same box comes back and the request is never completed. We've tried this several times over several days and always see the same behavior. I have also tried entering my password instead of his (since that makes more sense to me) but I encounter the same problem.
I have verified that I am signed in to my iCloud account and my iTunes account on my iPhone 5s. I have also verified that my son is logged in with his iCloud/iTunes account on his iPod touch, so why isn't this working? Additionally, if I disable "Ask to Buy" then I can successfully install apps on his iPod from the iPod itself.
Is it normal for the "Sign in to Approve" box to show his iCloud address instead of mine? And if so, why doesn't it complete when I enter his password? Am I missing something completely? This is driving me crazy.

Hi ,
When you click your link "Click here", the SharePoint web page with anchor will not work until refresh the page, if it's the case, you can add the javascript code to refresh the page automatically as workaround per the following similar post.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/f7eab808-da8a-44fd-9933-f9b992f5affc/sharepoint-anchor-tags?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
http://yalla.itgroove.net/2012/05/anchor-links-tags-in-sharepoint-2010/
<script type="text/javascript">
setTimeout(Reload,2000);
function Reload()
window.location.hash=self.document.location.hash.substring(1);
</script>
Thanks,
Daniel Yang
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support

Document parked not posting, approved by manager not posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for