Documents blocked on feeder system, but not on GTS

Hey guys,
we have repeatingly faced the following issue I would like you to comment on:
Order completed. Delivery in work. Transports started.
--> Our feeder system indicates a block due to delivery incompletion
GTS will not show any block because goods issue was already done.
Maybe you know how to solve that problem?
Thanks a lot!

Goods issue was done. GTS does not block anymore.
But in our feeder system, the delivery appears blocked due to incompletion.
You even do not have to save the document, you can simply check completion status of the delivery before.
As we face this error before saving, there is no clear error message.
Well our proposed solution was to go back with every step and then use the correct process.
But the goods have already passed customs and arrived the customer. So we cannot declare our goods again.
Thank you for your help anyways!

Similar Messages

I am in China. When I plug in my powerblock i get a green light for 10-15 seconds then it turns orange. It seems to feed power but not charge the battery. i have a message that says the battery is not charging.

I am in China. When I plug in my powerblock i get a green light for 10-15 seconds then it turns orange. It seems to feed power but not charge the battery. i have a message that says the battery is not charging.

Do these
https://support.apple.com/kb/HT3964
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.6/en/26871.html
https://support.apple.com/kb/TS1713
https://support.apple.com/kb/ht1509
could be the power isn't sufficient, use another location
make a note of any results you get and post them

Issue while calling the RFC in SAP quality system but not in SAP Dev sys

Hi,
Our scenario is FIle-RFC-File.
We are calling the RFC from XI system in Development environment. This is working fine in Development environment, but not in Quality environment.
This changes are moved/transported to Quality environment in both XI and SAP side. But we are getting the following error in Quality system:
<SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapterFramework</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MESSAGE">GENERAL</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText><b>com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: functiontemplate from repository was <null></b></SAP:AdditionalText>
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack />
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Please provide the inputs, what we can check at SAP side and XI side.
We have tried to test from XI Development to SAP quality environment, but we are getting the same error message.
Waiting for the precious inputs.
Thanks,
Ramesh.

Hi Ramesh,
This might be because your RFC adapter would not have been configured properly. Just do a check on it,in RWB(adapter monitoring) and activate it once more in ID.
Also check RFC comm. parameters such as host name/user id/password etc..
Also check whether your XML document is having a mismatch with your RFC XML.
Check with your payload ( from SXMB_MONI) and test it in your message mapping.
All the best!
cheers,
prashanth
P.S Please mark helpful answers

Wanted to block the Goods Receipt but not the Invoice Receipt

Hi
After the partial delivery of the Goods Receipt, i am manually setting the "Delivery completed" indicator in the PO. I dont want any future delivery against this PO. But it is allowing me to do a GR even though the Delivery Completed Indicator is set.
How can i stop all the future deliveries agains the PO. But at the same time, is should not block the IR. I tried this by locking the PO item. It is not allowing me to do any GR after locking the same. But at the same it is not allowing me to do the IR also.
Is there any way i can stop the GR, but do the IR for the purchase order ? Please clarify. Points assured.
Thanks
Venkat.

Hello,
If u maintain the latest GR date as a current date in the PO item level - delivery tab, then system will not allow to do further GR in future.
Latest Possible Goods Receipt
This is the latest acceptable date for goods receipt (GR).
If goods are received after this date, you will receive either a warning message or an error message, depending on the system setting.
If you receive an error message, you will not be able to post the GR.

Oracle 10g DB connecting for sys,system but not for other users

Hi,
I have oracle 10g in Windows XP. I am able to connect to database using sys/pwd@db as sysdba. All SYSDBA users able to connect DB.
When I try to connect using user, Its not throwing any error but not connecting. Just the cursor is blinking...
How to fix this issue.
Thanks in advance
-Mani

Hi,
I didnt see any error message in alert log. Its not logging any message while connecting DB using SYSDBA.
My DB is in NOARCHIVELOG mode.
Sill non DBA users are not able to login.
what could be the reason for this issue?
Any help....
Below is my alert log......
Dump file d:\oracle\product\10.1.0\admin\orcl10g\bdump\alert_orcl10g.log
Sat Apr 26 13:51:24 2008
ORACLE V10.1.0.2.0 - Production vsnsta=0
vsnsql=13 vsnxtr=3
Windows XP Version V5.1 Service Pack 2
CPU : 2 - type 586
Process Affinity: 0x00000000
Memory (A/P) : PH:270M/1014M, PG:852M/2441M, VA:1959M/2047M
Sat Apr 26 13:51:24 2008
Starting ORACLE instance (normal)
LICENSE_MAX_SESSION = 0
LICENSE_SESSIONS_WARNING = 0
Picked latch-free SCN scheme 2
KCCDEBUG_LEVEL = 0
Using LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_10 parameter default value as USE_DB_RECOVERY_FILE_DEST
Autotune of undo retention is turned on.
Dynamic strands is set to TRUE
Running with 2 shared and 18 private strand(s). Zero-copy redo is FALSE
IMODE=BR
ILAT =18
LICENSE_MAX_USERS = 0
SYS auditing is disabled
Starting up ORACLE RDBMS Version: 10.1.0.2.0.
System parameters with non-default values:
processes = 150
shared_pool_size = 83886080
large_pool_size = 8388608
java_pool_size = 50331648
resource_manager_plan = INTERNAL_QUIESCE
control_files = D:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.1.0\ORADATA\ORCL10G\CONTROL01.CTL, D:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.1.0\ORADATA\ORCL10G\CONTROL02.CTL, D:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.1.0\ORADATA\ORCL10G\CONTROL03.CTL
db_block_size = 8192
db_cache_size = 25165824
compatible = 10.1.0.2.0
db_file_multiblock_read_count= 16
db_recovery_file_dest = D:\oracle\product\10.1.0\flash_recovery_area
db_recovery_file_dest_size= 2147483648
undo_management = AUTO
undo_tablespace = UNDOTBS1
remote_login_passwordfile= EXCLUSIVE
db_domain =
dispatchers = (PROTOCOL=TCP) (SERVICE=orcl10gXDB)
job_queue_processes = 10
background_dump_dest = D:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.1.0\ADMIN\ORCL10G\BDUMP
user_dump_dest = D:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.1.0\ADMIN\ORCL10G\UDUMP
core_dump_dest = D:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.1.0\ADMIN\ORCL10G\CDUMP
sort_area_size = 65536
db_name = orcl10g
open_cursors = 300
pga_aggregate_target = 25165824
PMON started with pid=2, OS id=1840
MMAN started with pid=3, OS id=4044
DBW0 started with pid=4, OS id=2324
LGWR started with pid=5, OS id=3460
CKPT started with pid=6, OS id=720
SMON started with pid=7, OS id=964
RECO started with pid=8, OS id=1780
Sat Apr 26 13:51:24 2008
starting up 1 dispatcher(s) for network address '(ADDRESS=(PARTIAL=YES)(PROTOCOL=TCP))'...
CJQ0 started with pid=9, OS id=232
Sat Apr 26 13:51:24 2008
starting up 1 shared server(s) ...
Sat Apr 26 13:51:25 2008
alter database mount exclusive
Sat Apr 26 13:51:25 2008
Controlfile identified with block size 16384
Sat Apr 26 13:51:29 2008
Setting recovery target incarnation to 2
Sat Apr 26 13:51:29 2008
Successful mount of redo thread 1, with mount id 837414429
Sat Apr 26 13:51:29 2008
Database mounted in Exclusive Mode.
Completed: alter database mount exclusive
Sat Apr 26 13:51:29 2008
alter database open
Sat Apr 26 13:51:29 2008
Beginning crash recovery of 1 threads
attempting to start a parallel recovery with 2 processes
parallel recovery started with 2 processes
Sat Apr 26 13:51:30 2008
Started first pass scan
Sat Apr 26 13:51:30 2008
Completed first pass scan
2 redo blocks read, 3 data blocks need recovery
Sat Apr 26 13:51:30 2008
Started redo application at
Thread 1: logseq 199, block 6043, scn 0.0
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 3 Seq 199 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0 errs 0: D:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.1.0\ORADATA\ORCL10G\REDO03.LOG
Sat Apr 26 13:51:30 2008
Completed redo application
Sat Apr 26 13:51:30 2008
Completed crash recovery at
Thread 1: logseq 199, block 6045, scn 0.1325285
3 data blocks read, 3 data blocks written, 2 redo blocks read
Sat Apr 26 13:51:31 2008
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 200
Maximum redo generation record size = 120832 bytes
Maximum redo generation change vector size = 116476 bytes
Private_strands 7 at log switch
Thread 1 opened at log sequence 200
Current log# 1 seq# 200 mem# 0: D:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.1.0\ORADATA\ORCL10G\REDO01.LOG
Successful open of redo thread 1
Sat Apr 26 13:51:31 2008
MTTR advisory is disabled because FAST_START_MTTR_TARGET is not set
Sat Apr 26 13:51:31 2008
SMON: enabling cache recovery
Sat Apr 26 13:51:32 2008
Successfully onlined Undo Tablespace 1.
Sat Apr 26 13:51:32 2008
SMON: enabling tx recovery
Sat Apr 26 13:51:32 2008
Database Characterset is WE8MSWIN1252
Sat Apr 26 13:51:32 2008
Published database character set on system events channel
Sat Apr 26 13:51:33 2008
All processes have switched to database character set
Sat Apr 26 13:51:35 2008
Starting background process QMNC
QMNC started with pid=15, OS id=2160
Sat Apr 26 13:51:37 2008
replication_dependency_tracking turned off (no async multimaster replication found)
Sat Apr 26 13:51:38 2008
Starting background process MMON
Starting background process MMNL
MMON started with pid=16, OS id=3952
MMNL started with pid=17, OS id=3960
Sat Apr 26 13:51:39 2008
Completed: alter database open
Sat Apr 26 13:51:43 2008
db_recovery_file_dest_size of 2048 MB is 0.00% used. This is a
user-specified limit on the amount of space that will be used by this
database for recovery-related files, and does not reflect the amount of
space available in the underlying filesystem or ASM diskgroup.

Macaffee is blocking legitimate web sites but not with IE browser.

McAfee is blocking some legitimate web sites when I use Firefox but not when I use IE browser.

hello bobbrue, you have multiple malicious extensions present in your profile.
* first i'd recommend to [[Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems|reset firefox]]
* run a full scan of your system with the security software that you have in place and different other tools like the [http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free free version of malwarebytes] & [http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/download/adwcleaner/ adwcleaner].
* finally after you've completed the steps above please report back in the forum and include the then current troubleshooting information again, so that we can have a final check that everything in your profile seems clean.
thank you
[[Troubleshoot Firefox issues caused by malware]]

Billing Document getting reversed thru VF11 but not the accounting documen

Hi All,
I am using this transaction VF11 to reverse the billing document and its corresponding accounting document.But only the billing document is getting reversed but not the accounting doc. For eg The message im getting is
Document 92029379 saved (no accounting document generated)Message no. VF050
Will definitely reward points if helpful...
Regards,
Sushma.

Hi Sushma ,
It depends Upon ur Config settings .
Regards
Peram

Risk terminator - Works in one system but not in the other

Hi
I have two SAP systems which is connected to one GRC system. Risk Terminator works well for the one system but does not work at all for the other.
I have done the necessary configuration, set-up the RFC connector, tested the connectors, tested the connections from the GRC system. All seems fine but when I create a role in PFCG risk terminator does not seem to be trigged at all in my one system.
Please advise
Regards
Mo

I would check the adapter for the other system and that the external program is maintained correctly along with all the settings in /VIRSA/ZRTCNFG

USB stick shows up in Apple system but not in Disk utilities nor in finder

I havebought a brand new USB stick, brand Intenso (this is the last time I buy this brand!!) . I opened it and pluged it to the fast usb port on my Imac (osx10.5.8), till now all good, it shows up on the finder I save an important file on it and eject. A week later, my hard disk crashes, I try to recup a little data here and there. I dig out the Intenso stick, plug it: NOTHING. It appears in the Hard Disk: About------->More Info but not in the finder nor in Disk Utilities.
I tried on another mac laptop this time, still nothing and a laptop Pc: nothing.
Given that I already lost mega valuable data, it would a gift of God if someonecan help me recup at least this file!! Help

I could be looking at the wrong Disk Doctor application, the one I saw would not recover files, at least that is what I understood from the write up, it could be a different application than the one you have though.
Disk warrior is expensive and there is no guarantee that it would work, I suppose if you cannot find another application then you have a decision on if you want to buy it.
I would suggest you stop trying to recover the files until you have determined what applcation you want to use, the more your try and access the USB stick the more you are likely to make things worse. When you have a suitable application then give it a try, hopefully it will work for you.
Good luck

Logical (feeder) system cannot be determined - GTS error during BP Update

Hi All,
While updating a BP in CRM system, I am getting the following error in application log SLG1 as "Logical (feeder) system cannot be determined". This occurs when we change or create a BP and call the function module " BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT". The issue occurs from the function module "/SAPSLL/BP_XI_GET_LOGSYS" that does not provide any logical system. I feel this is due to any changes in GTS configuration as we did not find this issue earlier. Can anyone please provide me some directions in rectifying this issue.

Hi,
I just checked for the customer in GTS, but it is not shown there. I have following observations:
1. If i try to transfer Vendor from ECC to GTS, it is happening successfully. I could see that vendor in GTS.
2. Seems like Partner Number is allocated to Customer in GTS. I transferred Customer after successfully transferring vendor, Customer transferred failed!. So I again transferred Vendor from ECC to GTS, this happened successfully.
Observation:
First successfull vendor transfer: Partner Number in GTS: 134
Unsuccessfull transfer of Customer: Not visible in GTS
Second successfull vendor transfer: Partner Number in GTS: 136
Please see the above observation and let me if anything can be dudcted from this.
Also checked table BUT100 in GTS for Business Partners. Customer not visible here too.
Please Help!
Regards,
Madhav

FM CRM_PRIDOC_READ_OW works in source system but not when executed from BW

Hello All,
I have extended an extractor in the source system by adding additional fields.
One of the FM I've used is CRM_PRIDOC_READ_OW. When I run an extraction test in the source system eveything works and data does populates into the new fields.But when I run the infopackage from the BW side, I get an error message which saids the transaction has been terminated. I've been able to trace and pinpoint the possible cause of the error. When I do not call this FM, the infopackage finishes but I do not get data for the new fields and when I do call this FM, I get the error.
Has anyone experiance this issue before?
Your assistance will be much appreciated. Here is a portion of the code I wrote:
loop at I_TABLE into l_s_ZASCRM_OPPT_I.
    lv_guid = l_s_ZASCRM_OPPT_I-GUID.
    lv_item_guid = l_s_ZASCRM_OPPT_I-ITEM_GUID.
    call function 'CRM_PRIDOC_READ_OW'
      exporting
      iv_header_guid = lv_guid
      importing
      ES_PRIDOC = ls_pridoc.
    loop at ls_pridoc-PRIC_COND into ls_pric_cond.
      if ls_pric_cond-kposn = lv_item_guid.
        case ls_pric_cond-STUNR.
          when '40'.
            l_s_ZASCRM_OPPT_I-zz_gpm_ttl_i = ls_pric_cond-kwert.
          when '55'.
            l_s_ZASCRM_OPPT_I-zz_gpd_ttl_i = ls_pric_cond-kwert.
          when '60'.
            l_s_ZASCRM_OPPT_I-zzfy_sp_i = ls_pric_cond-kwert.
          when '70'.
            l_s_ZASCRM_OPPT_I-zzfy_gpm_i = ls_pric_cond-kwert.
          when '80'.
            l_s_ZASCRM_OPPT_I-zzfy_gpd_i = ls_pric_cond-kwert.
        endcase.
      endif.
    endloop.
    append l_s_ZASCRM_OPPT_I to l_s_ZASCRM_OPPT_Itab.
    clear l_s_ZASCRM_OPPT_I.
endloop
Thanks,
Jeff

Hello Geo!
Thank you for your question. I think we mapped all the systems you show. Always the same error. Concerning your systems my transport log would say:
Source system R3DEV does not exist
We mapped this.
Any ideas? Is there maybe something in customizing to do what could be forgetten? The system is newly connected and there have never been a transport compounded to this source system before.
Best regards,
Peter

Unix shell: Environment variable works for file system but not for ASM path

We would like to switch from file system to ASM for data files of Oracle tablespaces. For the path of the data files, we have so far used environment variables, e.g.,
CREATE TABLESPACE BMA DATAFILE '${ORACLE_DB_DATA}/bma.dbf' SIZE 2M AUTOEXTEND ON;
This works just fine (from shell scripts, PL/SQL packages, etc.) if ORACLE_DB_DATA denotes a file system path, such as "/home/oracle", but doesn’t work if the environment variable denotes an ASM path like "\+DATA/rac/datafile". I assume that it has something to do with "+" being a special character in the shell. However, escaping "\+" didn’t work. I tried with both bash and ksh.
Oracle managed files (e.g., set DB_CREATE_FILE_DEST to +DATA/rac/datafile) would be an option. However, this would require changing quite a few scripts and programs. Therefore, I am looking for a solution with the environment variable. Any suggestions?
The example below is on a RAC Attack system (http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/RAC_Attack_-OracleCluster_Database_at_Home). I get the same issues on Solaris/AIX/HP-UX on 11.2.0.3 also.
Thanks,
Martin
==== WORKS JUST FINE WITH ORACLE_DB_DATA DENOTING FILE SYSTEM PATH ====
collabn1:/home/oracle[RAC1]$ export ORACLE_DB_DATA=/home/oracle
collabn1:/home/oracle[RAC1]$ sqlplus "/ as sysdba"
SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.1.0 Production on Fri Aug 24 20:57:09 2012
Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, Real Application Clusters, Automatic Storage Management, OLAP,
Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> CREATE TABLESPACE BMA DATAFILE '${ORACLE_DB_DATA}/bma.dbf' SIZE 2M AUTOEXTEND ON;
Tablespace created.
SQL> !ls -l ${ORACLE_DB_DATA}/bma.dbf
-rw-r----- 1 oracle asmadmin 2105344 Aug 24 20:57 /home/oracle/bma.dbf
SQL> drop tablespace bma including contents and datafiles;
==== DOESN’T WORK WITH ORACLE_DB_DATA DENOTING ASM PATH ====
collabn1:/home/oracle[RAC1]$ export ORACLE_DB_DATA="+DATA/rac/datafile"
collabn1:/home/oracle[RAC1]$ sqlplus "/ as sysdba"
SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.1.0 Production on Fri Aug 24 21:08:47 2012
Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, Real Application Clusters, Automatic Storage Management, OLAP,
Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL> CREATE TABLESPACE BMA DATAFILE '${ORACLE_DB_DATA}/bma.dbf' SIZE 2M AUTOEXTEND ON;
CREATE TABLESPACE BMA DATAFILE '${ORACLE_DB_DATA}/bma.dbf' SIZE 2M AUTOEXTEND ON
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01119: error in creating database file '${ORACLE_DB_DATA}/bma.dbf'
ORA-27040: file create error, unable to create file
Linux Error: 2: No such file or directory
SQL> -- works if I substitute manually
SQL> CREATE TABLESPACE BMA DATAFILE '+DATA/rac/datafile/bma.dbf' SIZE 2M AUTOEXTEND ON;
Tablespace created.
SQL> drop tablespace bma including contents and datafiles;

My revised understanding is that it is not a shell issue with replacing +, but an Oracle problem. It appears that Oracle first checks whether the path starts with a "+" or not. If it does not (file system), it performs the normal environment variable resolution. If it does start with a "+" (ASM case), Oracle does not perform environment variable resolution. Escaping, such as "\+" instead of "+" doesn't work either.
To be more specific regarding my use case: I need the substitution to work from SQL*Plus scripts started with @script, PL/SQL packages with execute immediate, and optionally entered interactively in SQL*Plus.
Thanks,
Martin

Blocking process each other but not killing..

Hello,
I have situation where 2 SPID's 82 and 112 blocking each other but deadlock monitor is not killing one of them. 82 is trying to get the shared lock on few pages of an object and got the shared lock on 1 page where as waiting on other. mean while Spid 112
got the exclusive lock on the page where 82 is waiting for and trying to convert the lock on other page where 82 already has a lock.
This is perfect dead lock situation but SQL Server is not detecting it as dead lock so not killing one of the process.
This is on SQl Server 2008 R2 SP2 , can you please tell me why is this not being resolved by SQL Server?

I have the sp_locks for both the process here and filtered for the object which is causing it... hope this will help to see this clearly.
spid
dbid
ObjId
IndId
Type
Resource
Mode
Status
82
32
0
0
DB
S
GRANT
82
32
1272391602
0
TAB
IS
GRANT
82
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209437
S
WAIT
82
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209436
S
GRANT
spid
dbid
ObjId
IndId
Type
Resource
Mode
Status
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1.052083333
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
2
PAG
1:12188
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295103
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295137
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295141
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295145
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295149
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295151
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295152
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295155
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295157
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295163
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295165
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295167
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295104
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295117
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295120
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295122
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295126
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295128
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295134
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295172
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295445
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295446
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295441
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295488
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:295489
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:300960
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:307594
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:307593
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:308187
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:308185
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:308188
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
0
TAB
[UPDSTATS]
X
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
0
TAB
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:714003
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:713990
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:713929
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:713164
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:713166
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:713145
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:713136
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:713123
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:713118
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:713113
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:197314
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:197312
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:203702
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:203700
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:203216
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:208860
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:208856
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:210118
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209450
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209449
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209443
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209442
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209447
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209433
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209437
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209436
IU
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209436
IX
CNVT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209425
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209391
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209366
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:209363
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:211926
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:211370
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:211369
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:214621
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:214273
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:214274
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:217073
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:217072
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:215976
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:218335
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:218334
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:218308
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:219454
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:219448
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:103959
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
1
PAG
1:249456
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
2
PAG
1:783866
IX
GRANT
112
32
1272391602
2
PAG
1:783848
U
GRANT

Display sleeps with system but not alone

I have read the many posts regarding monitor sleep issues. I have recently bought a Viewsonic 20.1" widescreen LCD display and am using it on a Dual 1.8GHz G5 running OS 10.4.6.
At first the display would never sleep, when the computer went to sleep or told the display to sleep, it would simply flash a message on the screen, "No Signal" the Green LED would flash Orange and show the message again. I took some of the advice and tossed some .plist files, reset the SMU, reset the PRAM and NVRAM. It does sleep when the entire system sleeps now but still says "no signal" when I want only the display to power down. I have also tried with a new user acount and it makes no difference.
Viewsonic swears it's a configuration problem. I don't think I should have told them I was using a Mac.
Thanks to any and all who respond.
Mike.

I get this same behavior with a Viewsonic VP930b. Here's what Viewsonic told me about it:
Thank You for contacting ViewSonic Support. The blue message box you are referring to, is a communication, between the monitor and the computer, and therefore cannot be disabled. This message is not directed towards you in any way, it just so happens to be displayed on the monitor; It should only appear when:
* when changing from the BIOS to the operating system
* whenever you change the display properties
* when you switch signals
We apologize if this inconveniences you...
IF you have any other questions, please feel free to contact us at 1-800-688-6688; We are open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Can you believe that? They're basically saying, don't let it bother you.
What I've discovered is that when I put the computer to sleep, the message stops. On mine anyway, it only seems to happen when the computer tries to put the monitor to sleep and not the computer. I think?

Patch Successful on One system but not another?

I am wondering if there is a Cache dump or process of getting a patch system to recover from a failure where the patch has deployed successfully on a different system. There are a variety of errors depending on the patch as well as device. I see some remediation errors as well as server not found etc.
Will Clear cache help resolve this type of thing?
Does Windows Update service running cause problems with this process? Any other tips to get the rest of my deployment to become more successful?
If someone from Novell is listening... Where is the documentation on Patch deployment best practices? I have tried to review the online docs and can't find anything that gives clear guidelines on patch deployment. I also find that Windows update will show completely Updated by Microsoft yet ZPM shows massive patch deployments needed. I also have .Net 3.5.1 updates that showed successfully deployed, yet when the zac ps or DAU runs it still shows the update as needed.
Any help or guidance would be extremely helpful.
Thanks
Richard

rhuhman,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://forums.novell.com/

Documents blocked on feeder system, but not on GTS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for