Does 1841 router support IPsec vpn?

Hi,
how can i check if my router supports IPsec VPN?
Cisco 1841 Software (C18410IPBASEK9-M), 12.4(11)T
regards
kimhoe

Hi,
Yes, it does support IPSEC VPN. You can check it from software adviser tool at Cisco site,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/support/tsd_most_requested_tools.html
Regards,
~JG
Please rate helpful posts

Similar Messages

Support IPSec VPN Client in ASA Multiple Context Mode

I've looked at under "Cisco ASA Series CLI Configuration Guide, 9.0" on "Configuring Multiple Context Mode", it says
"IPsec sessions—5 sessions. (The maximum per context.) ". Does it mean in ASA Multiple Contest Mode support IPSec VPN Client? I just want to confirm it because I can't seem find any doc that clearly spell it out. I'll appreciate anyone who can clarify it.
Thank Jason.
( Please direct me to the right group if I'm not for the first time I post it in the Cisco support forum)

This is from the v9.3 config-guide:
Unsupported Features
Multiple context mode does not support the following features:
Remote access VPN. (Site-to-site VPN is supported.)

Does a Router support 2 BGP As in one router

Does a Router support 2 BGP As in one router. I have gone through the below Cisco page, however my router is not allowing to enter the second AS in the router, it is giving the error as usual " BGP is already running; AS is XX" .
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_2s/feature/guide/fsbgpdas.html#wp1056689
My Router :- Cisco 3845
IOS Version :- c3845-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T8.bin

Hi,
You can not run multiple BGP processes on a single router with each of them being in a separate AS. What you can do, and the link in your post explains that, is that towards a particular eBGP neighbor, you can use the neighbor local-as command to appear to be in a different AS than the one you really are in. So you do not start two BGP processes, you just make your single BGP process to appear to use a different ASN on a particular eBGP peering.
Best regards,
Peter

Does mountain lion support CISCO VPN client ?

Does OS X 10.8 mountain lion support CISCO VPN client? if yes which version ?, Does OS X 10.8 mountain lion support CISCO VPN client? if yes which version ?

If you have issues, try this link
http://erbmicha.com/2009/09/07/how-to-cisco-vpn-with-snow-leopard-via-pcf-file/
works for Mountain Lion as well

Does Cisco 857 router support Easy VPN?!!

Hi,
I've a Cisco 857 router with a 12.4(6)T IOS.
I want to configure it to act as an Easy VPN server, to allow my remote clients -using cisco vpn clients- to access the internal resourses behind the router.
Is it applicable with this router model?!!
thanks and regards,
Ala

Ala, upsolutely, you would probably need advance k9 security image, check at software advisory tools and slect software features for your platform.
sofware advisory
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/Fusion/FusionHome.do
857 Models See table 3 Software feature
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps380/ps6195/product_data_sheet0900aecd8028a9a9_ps380_Products_Data_Sheet.html
HTH
Rgds
Jorge

Does these router support VPN

Hi,
I would like to setup VPN between our HQ and users thru internet. The router in the HQ is 827 4v (12.2(3)). Is it possible to setup a VPN on this router?
What should i need the minimum requirement of router specs to achieve the above mentioned goal? My intention is to run a citrix published application from anywhere.
Thanks for your advises

Hi,
Below is the link that explains the set up.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800949db.shtml
I hope it helps.
Regards,
Arul

Does the iPhone support Xauth VPN?

I was wondering if the iPhone support Xauth in its VPN client?
If it doesn't, will there be any possibility of it supporting this feature in the future?

kfc01,
The iPhone Deployment Guide (linked from http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/enterprise) says it does for VPN.
Hope this helps,
Nathan C.

OSPF Route v IPSEC VPN

Hello all.
Could anyone point me in the right direction regarding the dilema below.
I have a pair of ASA 5510's running with VLAN Sub-interfaces. For simplicity i'm going to label them 1.3 (192.168.12.0/24) and 1.16 (172.16.100.0/24)
Connected to VLAN.3 is a 2801 Router that is advertising an OSPF route to 172.20.0.0/16 via 192.168.12.253 (MPLS network). I can see this in the routing table on the ASA.
However, I have to configure a new Site-to-Site VPN for a client on VLAN16, which as it would happen, use 172.20.0.0/16 at the remote end. The local networks are segregated and I do not have the 'Same Sec permit' enabled.
When I run a packet tracer from the VLAN16 Network, to 172.20.0.0/16 I can see its trying to egress out of 192.168.12.253.
The million dollar question is am I able to get this Site-to-site to 'ignore' the entry in the routing table and go out via the 'Outside' interface?
You can probably tell I'm a total novice so any assistance would be appreciated.
Thanks.

You would probably get a better response if you post this on the security forum.
I think your only option is to either perform desitnation NAT or have the remote end do the natting from their end in order to prevent the overlap.

Does cisco router support "tcp reset" mesg when the traffic blocked by access lit ?

hi ,
im trying to know if i blocked a destination with an access list on cisco.
can i make "tcp-rest " to that connection instead on dropping it ??
i belive it supported on ASA appliance , but not sure if supported on cisco routers.
im trying to migrate from linux router to cisco router and apply the same config , one of the challenging task is , i have
"reject-with=tcp-reset"
im wondering if i can do it on cisco router
waiting ur responce
regards

One of the things that keeps me engaged with these forums is that they challenge me and give me opportunities to learn new things. My initial reaction to your question about IPS on IOS router was to say that this is not supported. But I did some research and find that apparently IPS functionality is now supported on some (but not all) of Cisco IOS routers. See this link for additional detail:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/ios-intrusion-prevention-system-ips/product_data_sheet0900aecd803137cf.html
HTH
Rick

Does Extreme router support 3G dongles, since it has a USB port?

I have an Airtel 3G dongle and was wondering if I could use the USB port on the Apple Extreme router to make it work as a router that can broadcast 3G signals.

A dedicated mobile broadband router, as suggested by edex67, is a good idea. There are models from several manufacturers. Before you buy, ensure that the exact USB mobile broadband modem and the network operator are supported. Just as an example, the web page belows claims support for some Airtel modems:
http://www.ekwireless.in/modems.html
Jan

Does IOS will support Nortel VPN now ?

Hello
Since Apple, EMC, Ericsson, Microsoft, RIM et Sony have bought Nortel patent
is there any chance to have a VPN support for the Nortel equipement ?
Regards

http://www.apple.com/ios/feature-availability/

Does this router CISCO1921/K9 support VPN

Hi there!
ON HQ, i've a CISCO2901-SEC/K9 router.
but for one branch, i'm looking for model CISCO1921/K9
does this model, with ip base IOS that comes by default, support IPSEC so i could create site to site VPN with HQ.
if not, what can i do if i pickup such model, to upgrade it's IOS?
let me know.
regards!

The "Security License for Cisco 1900" part number SL-19-SEC-K9 has a list price of US$1000.
If the need is identified when buying a new router, it is usually sold as part of a bundle and the cost delta is less than that.
In either case, actual costs varies per your local reseller.
Without the SEC license active, the commands necessary to confiure VPN with IPsec are not available.

Server 2012 Built-In IPSec VPN & RAS & HyperV-Switch & Netgear Pro Safe Router, Tunnel Ok, but no Traffic

Hello,
i try to setup a IPSEC VPN (Site-by-Site or if not possible Client-BySite) between a Netgear Pro Safe Router and Windows Server 2012.
The Problem: Tunnel is up and running, but no Ping, no traffic at all.
the Server 2012 uses HyperV and has one hardware-NIC with public ip, lets say 123.123.123.1.
if no site-by-site is possible in my situation with built-in-tools this server would be only a client-site which would "dial-up" to the netgear box.
the server has a second virtual NIC with IP 192.168.137.1. Routing and RAS is enabled, because there are two virtual other servers whichs has 192.168.137.2 and 192.168.137.3.
The Netgear-ProSafe has public ip 122.122.122.1 and LAN-Subnet 192.168.21.0/24.
I created the Tunnel in the Advanced-Firewall-Options-Window. Both, Windows and the Router, say, the VPN-Tunnel is okay. Also, i can see ESP-Packets with wireshark.
If i ping (from router to server and other direction) i get no response. Some people said, the RAS itselfe could not accept packages, but i tried from one of the virtual clients also (192.168.137.2) and no ping there also.
i tried to add a route for subnet 192.168.21.0 with 192.168.137.1 as gateway but that didn't helped also.
now, after all this time i spend today to this problem i'm a bit confused.
as i know vpn-connections there are always virtual devices, and routes for the vpn-subnets assigned to this device.
the windows firewall does not create any device, and it does not create any route - i suppose, this is because "routing and ras or windows firewall-service" does this work "internally". is that correct? do i need any routes?
i was wondering why the ICMP packet from my ping in wireshark had the public ip as source (123.123.123.1) and not the "internal" 192.168.137.1 - and i tried to restrict the vpn-rule only for the virtual internal NIC but this isn't possible, as
it is no option inside the gui.
it would be great if somebody could explain me how config and packages SHOULD look....i've never used the built-in vpn/ipsec/ras services before, so i don't know how things has to be for a correct working environment. also, i need a solution and any help
to solve the problem would be great also!
now i try to sleep one night - maybe i get some nice idea after some hours of sleeping. good night.
Addition: After some more tests i find out that if i change the local endpoint (endpoint 1) from the virtual network (192.168.137.0/24) to the public ip of the server (123.123.123.1) inside the tunnel-rule and inside the vpn-policy of the router i can access
the netgear and other devices in the remote-network 192.168.21.0 over this ip-adresses. ping is not working, but other things seems to work fine. i want to be able to ping as well ofcourse and this wired configuration looks wrong to me...can some network-professional
help out with an explanation?
Second Addition: I can set the Local Endpoint also to "any" and it does work - but ping still does not work :-(
Third Addition: The Ping does work if i disable the NAT-Functionality on the Physical NIC. ....mhm.....

I would definitly recommend the usage of a virtual router instead using windows onboard-firewall to make the site-to-site tunnel!
as you can see in my linked thread above (Link)
this scenario is not supported from microsoft! you will run into problems!
we do run a hyperv virtual machine and install the wonderful distribution pfsense inside this box. pfsense is a software-linux-router with ipsec-functionality, which works like a charm!
and by the way i recommend to not use the products of netgear! they are expensive, very slow and the service is not good!
we have good experience with Vigor-Routers! They are less expensive, the Service is very good, and the devices are much faster, AND! ...the vpn-connections stay stable up!
this experience was very time-intensive to make! hope this will help someone else in the future.

Need help, VPN between 1841 router & PIX 501

Trying to setup a VPN between an 1841 router at HQ with static IP connecting to remote office with a PIX 501 and a persistent IP (not static, but Mediacom has mapped PIX MAC this IP so I always get same public IP even on equip reboot). I have configured both sides but tunnel will not come up, must be missing something.
See attached configs.
THANK YOU!

Sorry.
interface: outside
Crypto map tag: IPSEC, local addr. 12.206.137.5
local ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.5.5.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.2.1.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
current_peer: 216.203.117.82:500
PERMIT, flags={origin_is_acl,}
#pkts encaps: 659, #pkts encrypt: 659, #pkts digest 659
#pkts decaps: 462, #pkts decrypt: 462, #pkts verify 462
#pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
#pkts not compressed: 0, #pkts compr. failed: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
#send errors 124, #recv errors 0
local crypto endpt.: 12.206.137.5, remote crypto endpt.: 216.203.117.82
path mtu 1500, ipsec overhead 56, media mtu 1500
current outbound spi: 793ff99e
inbound esp sas:
spi: 0xcbd5b096(3419779222)
transform: esp-des esp-md5-hmac ,
in use settings ={Tunnel, }
slot: 0, conn id: 4, crypto map: IPSEC
IV size: 8 bytes
replay detection support: Y
inbound ah sas:
inbound pcp sas:
outbound esp sas:
spi: 0x793ff99e(2034235806)
transform: esp-des esp-md5-hmac ,
in use settings ={Tunnel, }
slot: 0, conn id: 3, crypto map: IPSEC
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4607996/1929)
IV size: 8 bytes
replay detection support: Y
outbound ah sas:
local ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.5.5.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (216.203.117.85/255.255.255.255/0/0)
current_peer: 216.203.117.82:500
PERMIT, flags={origin_is_acl,}
#pkts encaps: 2691, #pkts encrypt: 2691, #pkts digest 2691
#pkts decaps: 2601, #pkts decrypt: 2601, #pkts verify 2601
#pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
#pkts not compressed: 0, #pkts compr. failed: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
#send errors 0, #recv errors 0
local crypto endpt.: 12.206.137.5, remote crypto endpt.: 216.203.117.82
path mtu 1500, ipsec overhead 56, media mtu 1500
current outbound spi: c6d3ea5c
inbound esp sas:
spi: 0x55d659c5(1440111045)
transform: esp-des esp-md5-hmac ,
in use settings ={Tunnel, }
slot: 0, conn id: 1, crypto map: IPSEC
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4607097/1917)
replay detection support: Y
inbound ah sas:
inbound pcp sas:
outbound esp sas:
spi: 0xc6d3ea5c(3335776860)
transform: esp-des esp-md5-hmac ,
in use settings ={Tunnel, }
slot: 0, conn id: 2, crypto map: IPSEC
sa timing: remaining key lifetime (k/sec): (4607743/1890)
IV size: 8 bytes
replay detection support: Y
outbound ah sas:
outbound pcp sas:

Router 1841 tunnel supported

what is the maximun tunnel without a external Hardware-Based Encryption
IPSec Tunnels Supported ?
IPSec VPN Performance ?
and with a external Hardware-Based Encryption what it is the
IPSec Tunnels Supported ?
IPSec VPN Performance ?

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6635/ps7180/prod_brochure09186a00801f0a72.html
Cisco 1841 Integrated Services Router with onboard VPN
Maximum Tunnels - 100
Maximum 3DES/AES Throughput - 45 Mbps

Does 1841 router support IPsec vpn?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for