Does a 1066x CF card have speed difference to a 800x on a 5D Mark II?

Does a 1066x CF card have speed difference to a 800x on a 5D Mark II? Is there a limiting factor that I should have in mind in order to avoid unecessary expenses?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Sorry, I missed that in your first post. Here is the data for the 5D Mk II:    http://www.robgalbraith.com/camera_wb_multi_paged527.html?cid=6007-9784
(the drop down menu at the top lets you choose from many different cameras) 
With a 400x 60MB/s card the write speeds max out at about 30MB/s.
With a 1000x 150MB/s card the write speeds max out at about 50MB/s.
Mike Sowsun
S110, SL1, 5D Mk III

Similar Messages

  • I got a itunes gift card and when i try and buy some thing it asks me for my credit card details how does that work when i have £15 on my fone that i got on a gift card?

    i got a itunes gift card and when i try and buy some thing it asks me for my credit card details how does that work when i have £15 on my fone that i got on a gift card? as i am trying to buy a song and it is starting to really cheese me of now where it keeps asking for credit card details is there a way round it with out having to use a credit card?

    Contact iTunes Customer Service and request assistance
    Use this Link  >  Apple  Support  iTunes Store  Contact

  • Hi, we have a G5 Blade server running OS X 10.5.8 with a dual Fibre Channel card. The OS does not read the card and cannot establish connection to the RAID controller. I have tried to move the card to another port with no luck. Ran all the updated softwar

    Hi, we have a G5 Blade server running OS X 10.5.8 with adual Fibre Channel card. The OS does not read the card and cannot establishconnection to the RAID controller.
    I have tried to move the card to another port with no luck.Ran all the updated software possible. Please can someone advice

    Hi,
    Was the card previously working in that machine? If it was and you have a G5 tower you could try the card in there. Here is a list of Apple fibre cards and cables which show what's compatible with what. http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1769
    The card should appear in the System Profiler under Fibre Channel and PCI Cards.
    All the best
    Beatle

  • HT3702 I just purchased several items for I-pad and the billing statement says billed to store credit.  What does this mean ?  I have a $20  i-tunes card how do I pay with this ?

    I just purchased several items for I-pad and the billing statement says billed to store credit.  What does this mean ?  I have a $20  i-tunes card how do I pay with this ?  I'm an old **** and don't talk to anyone who plays with I-pad etc.

    That means it should have used your iTunes card credit = store Credit.
    You can check here...
    View Purchase History...
    Sign Into your Account... Click on your account name... Click on Account.... Purchase History
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2727
    If you have any problems...
    Contact iTunes Customer Service and request assistance
    Use this Link  >  Apple  Support  iTunes Store  Contact

  • TS3991 does not open.  i have deleted this app, and backed and restored and downloaded again but has not made any difference. Thanks.

    Can any one help.  How do i get my google app to open on my iphone? It just flashes up but does not open. I have deleted this app, and backed and restored and downloaded again but has not made any difference. Thanks.

    Tap Settings > General > Reset > Reset All Settings
    Then restart your iPad.
    See if that makes a difference.

  • PulseAudio does not see my card (and I have to use PulseAudio)

    ALSA works fine.
    To be specific, pavucontrol does not see my card (only sees my ATI HD5700 graphic card as HDMI output under "output")
    Here's aplay -l:
    card 0: SB [HDA ATI SB], device 0: ALC888 Analog [ALC888 Analog]
    Subdevices: 0/1
    Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
    card 0: SB [HDA ATI SB], device 1: ALC888 Digital [ALC888 Digital]
    Subdevices: 1/1
    Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
    card 1: Generic [HD-Audio Generic], device 3: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0]
    Subdevices: 1/1
    Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
    Card info
    00:14.2 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA)
    Subsystem: Giga-byte Technology Device a002
    Flags: bus master, slow devsel, latency 32, IRQ 16
    Memory at fe024000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
    Capabilities: <access denied>
    Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel
    Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel
    Interesting thing that happens:
    [bogdan@galaxy alsa]$ aplay -Dplughw:0,0 -fcd Front_Center.wav
    aplay: main:660: audio open error: Device or resource busy
    The reason I have to use PulseAudio is stupid skype that crashes on start without it installed.
    Help?

    Yep, that's the one I have installed. However it looks like the problem fixed itself. The sound now works, HOWEVER, I have a 5.1 system and only center, rears, and the sub works. Left and Right (main) don't. pavucontrol is set to 5.1 output. When I turn down the individual volumes of main left and main right, the center speaker is the one that actually is turned down. It's as if PulseAudio thinks that center speaker somehow represents both main left and right.

  • Does Verizon's iPhone 5 have pre-installed SIM cards or have SIM card slots?

    Does Verizon's iPhone 5 have pre-installed SIM cards or have SIM card slots?

    Does Verizon's iPhone 5 have pre-installed SIM cards or have SIM card slots?

  • HT201304 I have been trying for two weeks to log into iTunes using my Bank of America Visa Debit card but no progress. Is it that iTunes does not use debit card, I only have a debit card and  Not credit card, so does it mean I can't use iTunes .?

    I have been trying for two weeks to log into iTunes using my Bank of America Visa Debit card but no progress. Is it that iTunes does not use debit card, I only have a debit card and  Not credit card, so does it mean I can't use iTunes .?

    I believe if you haven't already setup an itunes account, if you have access to computer with iTunes installed , you can create an iTunes account on that computer with no credit/debit card and then just buy iTunes cards at your local retailer to get credits.

  • Does the white iPhone have any difference than the black iPhone?, Does the white iPhone have any difference than the black iPhone?

    Does the white iPhone4 have any differences than the black iPhone4?

    It is the sensor that detects that you are on a call with the iPhone next to your face and it disables the screen so you don't inadvertently press any controls.
    It has not been redesigned.

  • My sister bought a 16GB iPod touch 5 and went thru all the steps to set up but then realized it didn't have a camera. So we clicked reset and erase all contents and settings. This does mean her credit card info is erased right?? Thanks for your help.

    My sister bought a 16GB iPod touch 5 and went thru all the steps to set up but then realized it didn't have a camera. So we clicked reset and erase all contents and settings. This does mean her credit card info is erased right?? Thanks for your help.

    Welcome to Apple Support Communities
    When you erase an iPod touch, your information, apps and settings are deleted and iOS is back to factory settings. If she wanted an iPod touch with camera, she should return it after erasing it. Note that the iPod touch doesn't store her credit card information

  • AppleScript speed difference between 10.4 & 10.5

    This post is related to a question I posed in March 2009 (https://discussions.apple.com/message/9226100) regarding the speed difference between AppleScript text handling in OS X 10.5 compared with 10.4.11.
    I have recently written a script to search through a text file which is an xml file exported from WorkGroup Manager. The file, which is approximately 1.8 MB, contains all the user names on the school server (just over 1720 of them), their settings and any other information we have added. After adapting some script ideas (using text delimiters and offsets) which I found on the internet to assist with counting the number of users and searching through the information of each one, one at a time, I have a script which works far in excess of my expectations in terms of speed when run under OS X 10.4, but runs slower than molasses in winter under 10.5.
    The script counts the number of accounts, extracts each user's log-in name and also their actual name (which we have entered under a 'general info' or 'comments' field - I can't remember exactly where, but it is stored in the file), makes up a complete list of all account names (with the actual name, if present) and also makes up a subset of this information into a separate list which contains only the log-in names of those whose actual name has not yet been recorded on the server, then saves both lists to separate text files.
    My original attempts, using some rather clumsy text searching and comparison techniques, took about 1-2 minutes to go through the whole procedure. After some internet searching, head-scratching and a bit more more work, the finished script, when run on my G5 under OS X 10.4.11, takes less than 3 seconds to do all I have described above, including the writing to text files. To say I was pleased would be an understatement!
    Because the school/work environment, where the script would be run, is all OS X 10.5 or higher, I thought I should test it out under at least OS X 10.5. The script was developed on my DP 2.5GHz G5 with 8GB RAM running OS X 10.4.11. Using a fresh, clean installation of 10.5 I ran the script and was extremely disappointed. After letting it run for more than 20 minutes and still not finishing, I force quit AppleScript and reduced the number of accounts in the file. 40 accounts took 3 seconds, 60 accounts took 6 seconds, 80 took 11 seconds, 100 took 19 seconds and 120 took 27 seconds. I eventually let the script run right through - total time taken to process 1720 users was 65 minutes, compared to 3 seconds under 10.4.11!
    Given that it was tested on the same Mac, with the same amount of RAM, using the same script and the same original text file, the only variable left (that I can think of) is the change of OS version - 10.4.11 vs 10.5.
    As was pointed out to me in my previous post, AppleScript in OS X 10.5 handles all text as Unicode and has a greater overhead in processing time as a result. I have implemented the various bits of advice offered by respondents to my original post and changed the way I handled lists, etc. Obviously, if the script works so speedily under 10.4.11, I must have done something right in terms of code optimization/efficiency. It's when that exact same script is run under OS X 10.5 that it slows down incredibly. I even tried it on a 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo iMac running 10.5.8 - it still took 40 minutes and Activity Monitor showed CPU usage by Script Editor constantly above 80% (often well above 90%). Saving the script as an application made no difference in the time taken.
    Does anybody have any knowledge about what makes AppleScript Unicode-only text handling so slow? In this case, it is 1300 times slower! Is there any way of coercing/restricting the text handling/parsing to ASCII? If I really have to, I will set up a humble eMac at school with 10.4 on it just to handle large text files quickly with AppleScript, but I would prefer to be able to do it on the normal work Macs which have 10.5 or later on them. As mentioned, under 10.4.11 the script processes the 1.8MB text file with 1720 users and writes results to two files - all within 3 seconds, so I'm not really looking for coding suggestions unless they are directly related to what has changed in AppleScript under OS X 10.5. Without sounding too smug, the script works properly and speedily (at least in 10.4). I really would like to learn about the changes in AppleScript in OS X 10.5 and how to cope with or work around those changes.

    Hi,
    text 3 thru 14 in largeText
    character 3 thru 14 in largeText
    text 3  in largeText
    character 3  in largeText
    These lines will be slow on Leopard
    Getting some text in a variable that contains more than 60000 characters will be slower on Leopard,
    but I don't know why it's slower
    Here a test script.
    script o
        property t_text : ""
    end script
    set a to "abcdefghij"
    set tResult to ""
    repeat with i from 1 to 3
        set o's t_text to a
        repeat (item i of {17, 15, 14}) times
            set o's t_text to o's t_text & o's t_text -- add  characters in the variable
        end repeat
        set StartTime to current date
        -- test
        repeat 20 times
            set b to text 3 thru 14 in o's t_text -- get a text in the variable
        end repeat
        -- end test
        set EndTime to current date
        set TimeTaken to EndTime - StartTime
        set tResult to tResult & " Getting text in the variable which contains " & length of o's t_text & ", (20 times) = " & TimeTaken & " seconds." & return
    end repeat
    tResult
    Here the result on my old G5, 2 x 1.8 GHZ
    Getting text in the variable which contains 1310720 characters, (20 times)  = 50 seconds.
    Getting text in the variable which contains   327680 characters, (20 times)  = 12 seconds.
    Getting text in the variable which contains   163840 characters, (20 times)  =   6 seconds.
    The result on the same machine on Tiger is always less of one second.
    Also, I try with 20 millions characters on Tiger, the result : getting text in the variable which contains 20971520 characters, (20 times)  = 0 seconds.
    The solution ( text item in a list)
    Here the script
    script o
        property my_List : {}
    end script
    set OldDelims to text item delimiters
    set RecordDelimiter to "::::::::::::::"
    set LengthOfRecordDelimiter to length of RecordDelimiter
    set o's my_List to findAll(read (choose file), RecordDelimiter)
    on findAll(str, findString)
        set Oldtid to text item delimiters
        try
            set text item delimiters to findString
            if str does not contain findString then return {"Nothing found"}
            set t to str's text items
            set text item delimiters to Oldtid
            return t
        on error eMsg number eNum
            set text item delimiters to Oldtid
            error "Can't findAll: " & eMsg number eNum
        end try
    end findAll
    set NumberOfrecords to (count o's my_List)
    display dialog "There are " & NumberOfrecords & " accounts."
    set StartTime to current date
    set text item delimiters to ":"
    set FullUserList to {}
    set ListOfUnnamedUsers to {}
    -- first user needs to be done separately as it is not preceded by RecordDelimiter
    set EndOfHeader to "Standard:URL"
    set LengthOfEndOfHeader to length of EndOfHeader
    set EndOfHeaderOffset to the offset of EndOfHeader in (item 1 of o's my_List)
    set OffsetToApply to EndOfHeaderOffset
    set TextBeingChecked to text (OffsetToApply + LengthOfEndOfHeader + 1) thru -1 of (item 1 of o's my_List)
    tell TextBeingChecked to set {UserName, NameForInfo} to {text item 1, text item 7}
    if NameForInfo = "" then set end of ListOfUnnamedUsers to UserName & return
    set end of FullUserList to (UserName & tab & NameForInfo & return)
    -- now do all the others
    repeat with CounterG from 2 to (NumberOfrecords - 1)
        set TextBeingChecked to item CounterG of o's my_List
        tell TextBeingChecked to set {UserName, NameForInfo} to {text item 1, text item 7}
        if NameForInfo = "" then set end of ListOfUnnamedUsers to UserName & return
        set end of FullUserList to (UserName & tab & NameForInfo & return)
    end repeat
    set o's my_List to {}
    set text item delimiters to OldDelims
    -- write results to file
    -- 1). full user list
    set TargetFile1 to (path to desktop folder as string) & "FullUserList1.txt"
    try
        open for access file TargetFile1 with write permission
    on error
        close access file TargetFile1
        open for access file TargetFile1 with write permission
    end try
    set EndTime to current date
    beep
    set InfoToBeWrittenToFile to FullUserList as text
    write InfoToBeWrittenToFile to file TargetFile1
    close access file TargetFile1
    -- 2). list of users without NameForInfo
    set TargetFile2 to (path to desktop folder as string) & "UnnamedUsersList1.txt"
    try
        open for access file TargetFile2 with write permission
    on error
        close access file TargetFile2
        open for access file TargetFile2 with write permission
    end try
    set InfoToBeWrittenToFile to ListOfUnnamedUsers as text
    write InfoToBeWrittenToFile to file TargetFile2
    close access file TargetFile2
    beep 3
    set TimeTaken to EndTime - StartTime
    set TimePerAccount to TimeTaken / NumberOfrecords
    display dialog (NumberOfrecords & " accounts took " & TimeTaken & " seconds." & return & return & "That equals " & TimePerAccount & " seconds per account.") as string

  • SD card reader speed for X200

    Hi everyone,
    I'm going to try using readyboost, does anyone know the read/write speed of the SD card slot?
    Or do you have recommendations on using USB vs. SD card?
    I guess safest is to use USB.
    Thanks,
    HN

    if you have around 3 gig of ram, the readyboost doesn't do anything for your computer speed. 
    Regards,
    Jin Li
    May this year, be the year of 'DO'!
    I am a volunteer, and not a paid staff of Lenovo or Microsoft

  • Speed difference between i7 quad 3rd gen 2.6ghz and i7 quad 4th gen 3.1ghz?

    How much speed difference in Logic X will I notice between an i7 quad 3rd gen 2.6ghz and i7 quad 4th gen 3.1ghz?
    both loaded with 16gb 1600 ram... 256gb ssd

    Kappy wrote:
    All other things being equal 4-cores are twice as fast as 2-cores. This is regardless of what you are doing. The only way a 2-core processor would be as fast is if it were run at twice the clock speed. But the 2-core CPU is only clocked around 10% or so faster. Now, for all that you claim you will be doing the relevant question is do you need 4-cores. My answer is that you don't. But the 2-core machine will be slower - all things being equal.
    Iris is a far better GPU than HD4 or 5000. But not as fast as a discreet GPU with better performance measures. Again, you don't really need high-power GPU. Iris should meet your needs adequately for now.
    But remember you want to keep the computer for 6 or 7 years. No one knows what your needs will be then. You may find whatever you buy today that meets today's needs will be inadequate for tomorrow's.
    Your comments on graphics pretty much confirm the majority of what I've been reading on other sites.
    The conflict is with cores. About half the people are saying for low CPU intensive tasks 4 cores are totally unnecessary, while the other half says they'll make things faster no what the task (one thing all seem to have in common is they're totally against the 2014s).
    So it seems I'm left with the decision between faster performance vs better graphics.
    I appreciate your input.

  • Processor speed difference.

    Hello. I'm taking thought into getting a new laptop. I currently have the iBook G4 (the rest of specifications is at the bottom of my post). I'm quiet the impatient person, so I enjoy lots of performance in a computer. I mainly wanted to know the speed difference between the Processors of the G4 and Intel Duo, as if both CPU's are running at 2.0GHz. I acknowledge that the processors have faster clock speeds.
    Thanks in advance,
    Sir Wetzel.

    I just replaced by G4 Powerbook with a 2.8ghz Core 2 Duo MBP. It really depends on what you're doing, but in real world uses, the Intel processor cuts through video and sound encoding that leaves the G4 standing still. Photoshop launches in seconds, Safari almost immediately with no 'bounce'. RAW editing is a breeze. The G4 lagged badly when it came to RAW editing. It was nigh impossible to use Aperture for example.
    I'm not sure it's possible to do what you ask, since the duo is really 2 processors, not one. Try the Xbench website for comparisons between systems.

  • Does DVI Cable quality make a noticeable difference or does it not matter?

    Does DVI Cable quality make a noticeable difference or does it not matter?
    When you buy a monitor at a place like TigerDirect, they come with a thinner cable, but you purchase one for $21. Is it worth it?

    Check out http://www.monoprice.com they have great cables for cheap.
    To answer your question the cables are usually rated for the amount of bandwidth they can transfer and at what speed. At lower resolutions you don't need much bandwidth but to transfer 1080p you would need a cable capable of handling that. Most cables can handle that.
    But with the thinner cables it can affect the quality of the image. Just be sure to calibrate your monitor. Good luck!

Maybe you are looking for

  • Webi report part(include Opendoc Link) ondesktop did not work in BI Widgets

    My customer followed <BI Widgets User Guide>(XI3.1) to create a webi report part(include Opendoc Link) onto desktop. Page 26: To convert Report Part into a Widget ,drag and drop the Report Part from the Web Intelligence Viewer onto the desktop. As a

  • DVD-DL disk won't play on my iMac G5

    I am having a problem playing a DVD-DL disk on my iMac G5. I burned it on a Windows computer, and it works there, but then I put it into my iMac G5, and it spits it back out! I also tested it on an older iMac G3 and it works on that as well! WHY WON'

  • Order Book

    When I click "Buy Now" then appear text "Unable to Assemble Book * -[NSPlaceholderMutableString initWithString:]: nil argument" Can somebody explain me what is wrong? How can I buy a book?

  • How to get back to Full Screen View?

    I have been opening images of one of my iPhoto albums in Full Screen View adding four or five more images from the thumbnails row to see them simultaneously. So they appeared in a smaller size to fit the screen. But now whenever I want to open one of

  • Why does Firefox insist on popups to upgrade everytime I use it ?

    I tried using Firefox version 24 and it was not to my liking so I reinstalled Firefox 21 and now I get a pop up prompt asking me if I want to upgrade everytime I use Firefox. If I answer NO, it continues on and on and on whereas ONCE should be enough