Does ACE-30 support multicast in routed mode?

We currently have ACE20's, which only support multicast in bridge mode.
Was wondering if it's the same on ACE30's, or if Cisco finally implemented support for mcast in routed mode.
thx
Kevin

Could you please confirm if this applies to both ACE20 & ACE30, or just ACE20?
If both, when does Cisco plan on supporting mcast in routed mode?
thx
Kevin

Similar Messages

Does Premiere Pro support a "self-record" mode?

Does Premiere Pro support a "self-record" mode? It would record a new video with the source being what you are previewing, in terms of "animation" rather than in terms of the quality seen on screen. I often like to make humorous effects by dragging the time indicator back and forth, and have to resort to recording my own screen while in semi-fullscreen mode, then import that video and crop out the chrome. This obviously is not optimal and results in significant quality loss. Does Pr itself have such a feature built in?
I doubt it does, but it would be extremely useful.

Ditto what mark said. The intended purpose of the project manager is basically to do just as you said. It was a great solution for anyone that wanted to store the few usable minutes of their media and were confident in just discarding the rest. The problem is that, as Mark said, it doesn't handle the trimming of all common file types these days. That's because, in video, 'destructive' editing is always a matter of re-exporting edited versions and project manage simply cannot export every format to any format. The original files are never actually being trimmed down, you're just getting new versions to replace the old ones with. This represents another drawback in the form of generational loss. That's why the Project Trimmer many not be the ideal solution for you even if it is able to trim all applicable formats for you.
I tend to agree with Jim and thing that the better way to go is with Prelude. With that app, you can log what you want before hand and then capture (or, more accurately, 'Ingest') just those parts from the start. Still, it might be a good idea to save the original footage on memory card(s), hard drive(s)s (or , dare I say, tape(s_?). That way if you find out later that you didn't capture (or ingest) all of what you wanted, you can always go back and get it. Also you'll have an additional backup which could easily be re-captured from the original source if you've save the prelude project(s).

Does Aironet AP1121G support multicast?

Hello everybody.Can the two wireless client under the same AP1121G support the multicast forwarding?What do I config on the AP1121G?
Thanks a lots.

Hi,
What is the IOS version of your AP?
Refer to the following url on how to configure filter to allow multicast forwarding.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/wireless/ps4570/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080341cc4.html
*Look under 'Configuring and Enabling IP Filters'
Hope it helps.
Rgds,
AK

CSM bridge vs router mode

Hi,
Can the CSM be used in both the bridge and router mode for different VLANS ? Or does it need to use all router mode and all bridged mode ?

you can have a mix of both.
Gilles.

RV042 - What's a practical difference between gateway and router mode

That´s my scenario, I have a RV042 as gateway on subnet 192.168.254.0,subnet 192.168.0.0 on the same LAN and 3 vpn tunnels connected GATEWAY TO GATEWAY on subnet 192.168.1.0,192.168.2.0 and 192.168.4.0. I setup 192.168.0.0 as Multiple Subnet on RV042 so now i can ping 192.168.0.0 from RV042 but i can´t do this from clients. What i want to know is What will happen if i change RV042 mode from gateway to router and What do i do to make clients (workstations) on subnet 192.168.254.0 reach clients in subnet 192.168.0.0 .
Thx
Everyone

Gateway mode = RV042 does NAPT (network address & port translation);
Router mode = RV042 does not do NAPT

ACE in a routed mode

Guys,
Should the ACE be the gateway for the load balanced servers in a routed mode scenario ? If yes then why ?
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

yes ACE interface on server vlan should be gateway. routed mode implies layer 2 adjacency of servers and ace. If ace is not the gateway and you are not doing source nat on ace then servers would respond around the ace to client via it's gateway. unless specifically configured for direct server return client would be seing response from server address rather than vip resulting in failure.

Ace routing mode desging issue

need some assistance in configuring an application using routing mode on cisco ace
        clients ---asa--3750--cisco ace--- servers behind vip
                                                            |
                                                          visa card transaction servers
i am able to setup a vip on ace using routing mode on ACE,as the servers need to see the client ip ,so we are not performing SNAT,this part is working fine
when a request comes from the client ,it goes to the vip and to one of the backend servers ,and the request will be forwaded back to the ace ,as the default gateway on the servers is pointing to the server vlan on ace.
but if the transaction from the servers need to go to the visa card transaction servers ,how can we acheive this ,and after fetching the data from visa servers,does the reply will be fwd to the ACE or ASAs directly
Or do we need to have static routes defined on the visa servers to point to ASA
please advise me on this

Clint
No they are completely in a different network ,
When a client hits the VIP ,the request goes to the ASA
ASA fwd the vip traffic to the ACE (VIP) interface ,and from there it fwd the traffic to the (server vlan) interface and to the appropriate backend servers.
Backend server responds back to the (server vlan ) interface and the traffic fwd back to the ASA.
But when visa card transaction need to take place ( farm servers ) need to route the traffic to the visa servers which will be in different subnet range .
Do the farm serevrs send the request back to the ASA and can we configure static routes on ASA to point to the visa servers.
Are on the farm servers can we have static routes for the visa servers
Or can I defind static routes on ACEs for the visa servers.

ACE bridge mode , FWSM routed mode

i have the following senario:
MSFC ---vlan 777----FWSM----vlan160---ACE----VLAN180
FWSM is working in routed mode and vlan 777 is shared between the MSFC and FWSM
ACE is working in bridged mode and vlan 160 is shared between the FWSM and ACE
vlan 180 is the server side vlan
i want he FWSM ip address to be the Server gateway while ACE module in
bridge mode
i create bvi interface but i can't ping from ACE to FWSM or from FWSM to
ACE
if i change ACE to routed mode , i can ping to FWSM
any body can help me in this issue?

The config looks good.
I would look at the arp table on FWSM and ACE when the ping fails and also capture a sniffer trace of ACE tengig interface and see if the ping request goes out - on which vlan - and if we get a response.
Is evertyhing else working ?
Like ping through the ACE module ?
Your config does not show a 'no shutdown' on the vlan interface, but I assume you fixed that already.
Gilles.

Can VIP and Rservers be in the same subnet in ACE Routed Mode

Good Day,
Sorry for the lengthy post.
Currently I have a 6509s running in VSS mode with ACE30 in each chassis.
I have 5 vlans, which the VSS is the L3 interface for each. 1 Vlan is for management, the others are the data vlans for the servers.
The ACE is configured in bridge mode, with all VLANs going to a specific context (non Admin).
Some of the Host on each VLANs are not utilized for load-balancing. The default gateway for each VLAN is configured on the VSS.
I would like to setup the ACE in the routed mode, without having to change the IP address of each servers on different VLANs.
Basically I want to turn off the SVIs on VSS and move the L3 interface on the ACE Context, and let it perform the local routing for all the hosts.
I was going to add a new /30 L3 interface between the VSS and ACE to be utilized for default route traffic coming from the ACE Context, and static routes from VSS to ACE for traffic destined to host that are being load-balanced and not being load-balanced. Basically force the traffic through the load-balancer in/out.
For future deployment, I was planning on using different IP address for the VIPs, and Real servers (most likely RFC 1918).
From most of the examples I have seen the VIP and Rservers are in different Subnets. But because I am trying to not change the IP address of the rservers and VIP, I wanted to know if the VIP and Rservers can be configured to be in the same subnet where the ACE is in routed mode.
Unfortunately I don't have a spare ACE to test scenario.
As always any help would greatly be appreciated.
Regards,
Raman

Link-local addresses are usually the self assigned IP address that a device will set when a DHCP server cannot be found. These are the addresses with 169.254.x.x subnet.
If the router is assigning IP addresses for your network, then they will usually have a different IP subnet, possibly 192.168.0 for D-Link. And this subnet would be for the wired and wireless connections. So it would be more a case of bridging the two network topolgies rather than routing them.
The network host is busy message could be more to do with the driver and the IP protocol selected when creating the queue than the connection being broken between the Mac and printer. If you were to open Network Utility and select the Ping tab, enter the IP address of the HP and set the pings to 4, pressing the Ping button will soon show if there is a path through the wireless to the printer.
If you get a response to the ping you could then open Safari and type the ip address as the URL. This would then connect to the internal web page of the printer and possibly let you enable an IP protocol like LPR so that you can use LPD on the Mac instead of Bonjour to connect to the printer.
As for the driver, you could look at using a Gutenprint driver instead of the HP driver or the hpijs package to get past the limitations that some printer drivers have with network connections.

Does Apple TV support wireless connection to the new MacBook Pro retina in an extended display mode?

Does Apple TV support wireless connection to the MacBook Pro retina display in an extended display mode? What is the output resolution and is sound also transmitted across?

SB1983, by extended display do you mean mirror? All MBP since early 2011 support it if they are running OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion. The resolution will depend on your Apple TV (2 Gen is 720 and 3rd Gen 1080) and wifi, it will lose some quality but I find it minimal. It does also mirror the sound.
Jules

Does BT IP Clear MPLS support multicast?

Hi
Requirement is to multicast music on hold RTP stream from a Data Center to a remote site over BT IP Clear MPLS network. Catalyst 3750 switches (both running IP Services Image) will BGP peer with BT PE equipment. The Catalyst 3750 switches will also be configured with PIM-SM.
Does BT MPLS support IP Multicast? I could not find any info on the web so I am hoping people have tried it and (hopefully) it worked for them!
Are there any restictictions/limitations using Catalyst 3750 for BGP peering?
Thanks

sidhu
If you are looking for multicast support on mpls link then you need to ask your SP to provide you the mVPN services. Because they need to configure the default and data mdt under the vrf.
regards
shivlu jain

ACE in routed mode

My first question, can anyone recommend some very heavy reading discussing the ACE modules and associated traffic flows and order of operations? Not just how-to scenarios.
And the primary question that brings me here:
I've got an ACE module in a 6500 chassis that's configured for routed mode. For the purpose of this question we'll say that on the ACE I have a single VLAN for vIPs and a single VLAN for rservers. vIP VLAN is 12 and rserver VLAN is 101. I have a pair of App servers being load balanced, and a pair of Web servers being load balanced.
When user devices send traffic to the Web servers vIP, traffic hits the SVI for VLAN 12 and the service-policy is applied manipulating that traffic and sending it to the VLAN 101 SVI and on down to an rserver. The same if user devices are sending traffic to the App servers vIP.
When a Web server tries to send over to the App servers vIP, I get no response. In fact, from the Web server I can't even ping my gateway (SVI for VLAN 101). How do I get the Web server to send traffic loadbalanced across the App servers?
Here's an example ACE config:
access-list ALL line 8 extended permit ip any any
probe tcp 5555
port 5555
interval 5
passdetect interval 30
probe http HTTP
interval 5
passdetect interval 30
expect status 200 200
rserver host APP01
description App Server 1
ip address 10.10.101.15
probe 5555
inservice
rserver host APP02
description App Server 2
ip address 10.10.101.16
probe 5555
inservice
rserver host WEB01
description Web Server 1
ip address 10.10.101.17
probe HTTP
inservice
rserver host WEB02
description Web Server 2
ip address 10.10.101.18
probe HTTP
inservice
serverfarm host APP-SERVERS
predictor leastconns
rserver APP01
    inservice
rserver APP02
    inservice
serverfarm host WEB-SERVERS
predictor leastconns
rserver WEB01
    inservice
rserver WEB02
    inservice
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.255 address both WEB-STICKY
replicate sticky
serverfarm WEB-SERVERS
sticky ip-netmask 255.255.255.255 address both APP-STICKY
replicate sticky
serverfarm APP-SERVERS
class-map match-any APP-VIP
description App Servers VIP
2 match virtual-address 10.10.12.21 tcp eq 5555
class-map match-any WEB-VIP
description Web Servers VIP
2 match virtual-address 10.10.12.20 tcp eq https
3 match virtual-address 10.10.12.20 tcp eq www
policy-map type loadbalance first-match L7-APP-SERVERS
class class-default
    sticky-serverfarm APP-STICKY
policy-map type loadbalance first-match L7-WEB-SERVERS
class class-default
    sticky-serverfarm WEB-STICKY
policy-map multi-match L4-CONTEXT-A-VLAN
class WEB-VIP
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy L7-WEB-SERVERS
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply
class APP-VIP
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy L7-APP-SERVERS
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply
interface vlan 12
description ACE-CONTEXT-A-vIPs
ip address 10.10.12.5 255.255.252.0
alias 10.10.12.4 255.255.252.0
peer ip address 10.10.12.6 255.255.252.0
access-group input ALL
service-policy input MGMT-ACCESS
service-policy input L4-CONTEXT-A-VLAN
no shutdown
interface vlan 101
description ACE-CONTEXT-A-SERVERS
ip address 10.10.101.2 255.255.255.0
alias 10.10.101.1 255.255.255.0
peer ip address 10.10.101.3 255.255.255.0
access-group input ALL
no shutdown

Hi Adam,
You can check Gilles' DC t-shooting guides that should give you a very good overwiew about packet processing on the ACE; also you can check
the Cisco wiki site where you find the scenarios plus a detailed explanation for traffic management.
Now going back to your issue, you problem can be splitted in two parts.
1. Web server not able to ping VLAN 101 ACE's SVI.
ACE is a closed device, meaning that access to each Interface/VLAN needs to be explicitly configured; you need to apply the management policy
to the 101 SVI to allow ICMP or any other management protocol. You can apply the same (service-policy input MGMT-ACCESS) or create a new
one just for ICMP, that's up to you.
2. Web servers not able to communicate with APP servers thorugh VIP.(vise-versa)
Problem here is that servers are trying to communicate through SVI 101 but no VIPs are applied to it so the ACE will simply discard the packets
for 10.10.12.20/10.10.12.21 on that interface, servers have the ARP and everything to reach those VIPs but the ACE has not been instructed to do
load balancing for clients reaching it out through VLAN 101.
In order to do load balancing between APP & Web Servers you need to configure L4-CONTEXT-A-VLAN on SVI 101 as well.
Also since your servers are sitting all in the same VLAN you're going to need client NAT to prevent assymetric routing on server-to-server communications.
I've attached a sample with NAT based on your config.
HTH
Pablo

Sharing a VLAN between FWSM and ACE (Routed Mode)

Anybody in here with experience on sharing a Vlan between an ACE and a FWSM module?
I have a transfer network between the ACE and the FWSM in the same chassis. FWSM gets several vlans and ACE gets some Vlans.
I wanted to configure it like this.
firewall vlan group 10 <FWSM only vlans>
firewall vlan group 20 <shared FWSM and ACE vlan>
or
svclc vlan group 20 <shared FWSM and ACE vlan>
svclc vlan group 30 <ACE only vlans>
The design hides the client side network and the server side network for the ACE behind the FWSM module.
Layout:
|-- Clients <--> MSFC <--> FWSM <--> ACE <--> Server --|
So allocation on the 65xx would be like this.
firewall module n vlan-group 10,20
svclc module n vlan-group 20,30
Any obvious issues with this design if you share the vlan(s) referred in group 20 with both modules?
FWSM and ACE will be in routed mode.
Thanks for reading...
Roble

Never mind...
Just found the perfect answer for this in a another posting from Syed.
http://forum.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Data%20Center&topic=SNA%20Data%20Center%20Networking&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40%40.1dddee0b/0#selected_message
Roble

ACE routed mode design issue

I am configuring ACE in routing mode ,
Below is my ACE interface config.
interface vlan 28
description "CLIENT VLAN"
ip address 192.168.10.11 255.255.255.248
peer ip address 192.168.10.12 255.255.255.248
mtu 1500
mac-sticky enable
access-group input ALL
service-policy input remote_mgmt_allow_policy
service-policy input POLICY
no shutdown
interface vlan 29
description "SERVER VLAN"
ip address 192.168.10.19 255.255.255.248
peer ip address 192.168.10.20 255.255.255.248
mtu 1500
mac-sticky enable
access-group input ALL
service-policy input remote_mgmt_allow_policy
service-policy input POLICY
no shutdown
When I configuring my servers in vlan 29 and point the default gateway to 192.168.10.19 it works fine no issues,but when this ACEs goes down and the standby becomes active ,my servers default gateway will be still pointing to 192.168.10.19 do i need to manually change it .20
or can I configure HSRP,Please advise me on this

Hi ,
Yes the alias should be set as gateway for the servers.
The alias is a shared address between the peers. This address will be on the ACTIVE ace.
Regards
Dan

Does sge 2010 support Routing Information Protocol (RIP) ?

Hi, I would like to know if the sge2010 switch support Routing Information Protocol (RIP) and if so how do I enable it. I have a small wireless router that support it and would like client connected on it te bo visible from the wan side and that worked when I had another device doing the routing with RIP support the wireless router was picking up that information and the routing for the wireless client was working.
Thanks !

thanks, thats a shame that a 80$ wireless router support that function and a 1000$+ switch doesn't

Does ACE-30 support multicast in routed mode?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for