Does an "incomplete font" warning make sense for ttf?

Hi all,
we are getting "font incomplete" errors in the package dialog. According to the online help this "Lists fonts that have a screen font on the current computer but not a corresponding printer font."
Does that even make sense for true types? As far as I know there is no such thing as a separate screen and printer font in ttf.
To make things worse the fonts in question are Georgia and Times New Roman - both are system fonts.
Specs:
Windows 7 64 bit SP1
InDesign 7.04
I can't reproduce this on my machine but that's running 32 bit.
Should we ignore it?
Any hints appreciated - tried a forum search but didn't find very much.
Regards,
Mike

There is no real erro message but a warning in the package dialog (sorry but we are using the German version):
The report doesn't offer much more information:
SCHRIFTARTEN
(Nur Probleme anzeigen)
17 Schriftart(en) verwendet; 0 fehlend, 10 eingebettet, 2 unvollst., 0 geschützt
- Name: Georgia; Typ: OpenType TrueType, Status: unvollst.
Dateiname: n. zutr.
Vollständiger Name: Georgia
Zuerst verwendet auf Seite: 31
Geschützt: Nein
- Name: TimesNewRomanPSMT; Typ: OpenType TrueType, Status: unvollst.
Dateiname: n. zutr.
Vollständiger Name: Times New Roman
Zuerst verwendet auf Seite: 30
Geschützt: Nein
We actually don't even know where TimesNewRoman comes from - I suspect it's in one of the numerous linked pdf files. But then the dialog should state which files they come from.

Similar Messages

Does a QMaster Cluster really make sense for Final Cut Server?

Correct me if I'm wrong, and I often am, but my understanding of the difference between setting up a "Cluster" and just using "This Machine" is the cluster allows multiple jobs to be processed simultaneously, while an unmanaged system will only do one job at a time. However, when it does that one job, it uses all the system's processors.
Yesterday I created a cluster consisting of two Quad Core Intel systems, and started Final Cut Server cataloging about a half a TB of data. I noticed that Server submits the Proxy render jobs one at a time, and that the jobs were being submitted to only one processor core, in a rotating fashion. Is there a way to make FCServer submit jobs in "parallel," or am I better off with using just the local system for transcoding?

The default proxy transcode setting seems to be specifically tuned to work at a small scale, which makes sense if you are asking a box to host the database, serve the app, and do all the proxy transcodes. I observed the same phenomenon, so I made my own transcode setting for proxies and I chose to lower the bitrate a bit to help with file size and transfer time. The upside is the floodgates are wide open when my 32 core Xeon cluster (four 8-cores) goes to town on a proxy encoding job.
Your other observation is also right, that only one item is encoded at a time across the cluster rather than working on all of them at once across the cluster. So what you get with a fast cluster is shorter encode time, not parallel encodings that all finish at the same time.
If you have the spare machines to dedicate to cluster work, I strongly endorse setting up that way. I would not recommend Quick Clusters for Final Cut Server encoding duty. Either set up a dedicated Managed Cluster that FCSvr can use or none at all.

Does it make sense for me to upgrade a 2007 macbook to lion?

My wife has a 2007 macbook 2.2 mhz intel dual core with 2GB of RAM. She is using Snow Leopard.
I updated my 2010 MBP to Lion and it works well; faster. I'm not sure it would be worth installing Lion on her machine.
Has anyone installed Lion on a similiar 2007 MB machine and how is the result?
Can you use all the gestures on the track pad?
Is it slowed down? or faster?
Any comments would be appreciated.

Re: Would it make sense for me to upgrade to:
Apr 20, 2013 6:59 PM (in response to AppleClubSupport)
Hey, thanks for the rapid reply. Will the change be totally transparent or will there be things I have to look out for? what would you consider the biggest improvement I might realize from this change?
Dan

"Incomplete font" warning when packaging a file in InDesign CS5.5?

When I package a file, any fonts that appear with an "incomplete font" warning, are not collected. But these fonts aren't incomplete at all—I have installed them from the file that I purchased from Linotype (Helvetica Neue). Can someone please tell me how to make this warning go away and have InDesign recognise that the font is in fact complete?

"Helvetica Neue" ... are you working on a Mac?
I'm asking this because Mac OS X comes with a Helvetica Neue installed -- in fact it's part of the required System set. But Apple decided the font was not good enough as it was, and made a couple of changes to it to make it work "better", and in doing so they broke a couple of things that fonts need to get printed correctly. So everyone's advice is to steer well away from using the System version of Helvetica Neue on a Mac.
Which brings me back to your assertion
jowillis79 wrote:
I have installed them from the file that I purchased from Linotype (Helvetica Neue).
as I suggest you very carefully and thouroughly double- then triple-check that you are, in fact, using your own Helvetica Neue instead of the system one.

Would it make sense for me to upgrade to:

I now have:
Model Name:          Mac Pro
Model Identifier:          MacPro5,1
Processor Name:          Quad-Core Intel Xeon
Processor Speed:          2.8 GHz
Number Of Processors:          1
Total Number Of Cores:          4
L2 Cache (per core):          256 KB
L3 Cache:          8 MB
Memory:          12 GB
Processor Interconnect Speed:          4.8 GT/s
Boot ROM Version:          MP51.007F.B03
SMC Version (system):          1.39f11
SMC Version (processor tray):          1.39f11
I am now running 10.6.8. Would it make sense for me to up grade to OS 8 or would it just open up a bag of worms?
Thanks
Dan Page

Re: Would it make sense for me to upgrade to:
Apr 20, 2013 6:59 PM (in response to AppleClubSupport)
Hey, thanks for the rapid reply. Will the change be totally transparent or will there be things I have to look out for? what would you consider the biggest improvement I might realize from this change?
Dan

Does EAP/SIM make sense for others than mobile operators?

Hi,
I'm wondering about the many different EAP authentication protocols. One of these is EAP/SIM (initiated by Nokia). I think the advantage of this authentication method might be the kind of key exchange. Users are familiar in using SIM-cards. Out of this consideration I have some questions:
* Is EAP/SIM as secure as EAP/TLS or EAP/Cisco?
* Does it make sense to use EAP/SIM as an WISP (given that the WISP is NOT a GSM/UMTS mobile operator)?
* What is the position of Cisco to EAP/SIM? Will Cisco support it?
Best regards,
Armin

This white paper should help: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/witc/ao1200ap/prodlit/wswpf_wp.htm

InDesign CC / Cloud Fonts - Incomplete Font warning, does not export font when Packaging?

I'm using a new font from the creative cloud. I packaged my project and the fonts showed "incomplete fonts" and then didn't export the font, into the font folder, when packaging. There is an AdobeFnt15.lst file in the fonts folder, which I'm not sure about? If this is the case, how will I deliver my project to my printer when it is finished?

If you downloaded Typekit fonts from the Creative Cloud (the ones available from the Fonts menu in the Creative Cloud Desktop app), they are not packaged. They are only licensed to Creative Cloud subscribers or Typekit subscribers. They can be embedded in a PDF file or in an EPUB file or in a DPS project.
So you have two options: (1) Given the popularity of the Creative Cloud, your printer should have at least one CC subscription, then they can download the fonts you're using. In fact, it's a relatively automatic process and I describe in the linked blog post below; or (2) you can create a PDF file they can print from.
Here's an article on how it works:
Typekit Update in InDesign CC 9.2

Help. Does use of .txt file make sense or code directly into an ArrayList

I am writing my first program and I want to put a series of information in various .txt files. This is because I will have a lot of different objects that I will create that will needed to be iterated over (most of the objects are similar in many ways). It seemed to me that a .txt file would be better than writing the items directly in an arraylist (if you know what i mean). What do you think?
There will be 7 different objects that will be iterated over (and there will be 12 other objects doing other things as well, they will not be in .txt format), and I thought instead of having to maintain it through the actual code, I would just have .txt files that I create in notepad or something so that when I need to make changes to one of the 7 objects I only have to get the .txt file instead of having to wade through the code to find that object.
Does this make sense?
It seems that I will now have to do a lot of I / O to make it work, so now I am thinking maybe it is better to simply use the arrylist. Is there a benefit of one over the other in this circumstance?
Also one of the objects has jpeg files that will need to be iterated over. Actually for these I will put them in an array list, because I can't seem to figure out yet how to get an image and the information about the image to display within I/O (like CD covers and their titles).
Thank you for any help and suggestions I feel a little overwhelmed, but hopeful, with you kind folks.
Peace
NB I know that I am not using the correct terminology, but I hope that you can understand what I mean.
Message was edited by:
peacerosetx

I am writing my first program and I want to put a
series of information in various .txt files. Thisis
because I will have a lot of different objects thatI
will create that will needed to be iterated over
(most of the objects are similar in many ways). It
seemed to me that a .txt file would be better than
writing the items directly in an arraylist (if you
know what i mean). What do you think? I think I do not know what you mean. I also think
that ArrayLists and files shouldn't replace eachI am going to use an ArrayList. Merci
other.
There will be 7 different objects that will be
iterated over (and there will be 12 other objects
doing other things as well, they will not be in.txt
format),Seven objects? Twelve objects? Huh? Why not use
arrays? And how do you get an object into a text
file?
and I thought instead of having to maintain
it through the actual code, I would just have .txt
files that I create in notepad or something sothat
when I need to make changes to one of the 7 objectsI
only have to get the .txt file instead of havingto
wade through the code to find that object.
Does this make sense? Your description? Not to me.
It seems that I will now have to do a lot of I / Oto
make it work, so now I am thinking maybe it isbetter
to simply use the arrylist. Is there a benefit of
one over the other in this circumstance? Uh, ArrayList is way faster and much easier
modifyable.
Also one of the objects has jpeg files that willneed
to be iterated over. Actually for these I will put
them in an array list, because I can't seem tofigure
out yet how to get an image and the informationabout
the image to display within I/O (like CD coversand
their titles). "Display within I/O"? This makes no sense.
NB I know that I am not using the correct
terminology, but I hope that you can understandwhat
I mean.If you're not using the correct terminology, there's
no chance for us to understand you. If you say
"objects" but mean "classes", then say classes.

OO Design--do ABAP Persistent Classes make sense for ALV reports in NW2004?

Hello experts,
At our company, we started using ABAP OO in the last year.
I am on NW-2004 . We just acquired a business that is on 4.6C.
We have a lot of customization to bring into our system. There are a lot of reports with common queries that span multiple tables.
I would like to follow the best practice for OO design and create global classes for the data access layer the business logic layer and the UI layer. For the UI layer, I will be utilizing the SALV class, since NW2004 doesn't have ABAP WebDynpro (we don't have a java stack available for development and software change management).
For the data access layer, I would like to use the persistent classes, but without the query manager, it just doesn't make sense.
Thomas Jung said in a blog that he sometimes used SQL to get the keys and then used persistent classes to retrieve the remaining data. But for straight ALV reporting, that just seems inefficient. But it could be that I am just not familiar enough with the technology.
I am looking for suggestions on how to design the data access layer for these intense and commonly used queries.
(Ironically, we will upgrade to NW2004s after this migration -- ouch!)
All ideas are appreciated.
Thanks.

Hi Kimberly,
the main advantage of persistent objects is that their state can be saved in the database. If a persistent object changes in your program, these changes can be reflected in the corresponding database field(s). Thus, persistent objects are very useful when doing CRUD (create, read, update and delete) operations with business objects.
However, if you just want to read data (for simple reporting) but do not plan to implement any of the other CRUD operations, I doubt if a persistency layer is necessary since this causes extra effort during design time and runtime. In that case, simple SELECT statements seem to be more appropriate.
Regards,
David

Does my DNG/RAW workflow make sense to you?

Ive been shooting RAW from my Nikon D50, converting the files to DNG (3.3), opening them in Adobe Camera RAW (2.4) using PSCS, processing and saving in TIFF (often through a droplet). In the process I retain the original RAW .NEF file, create a universal DNG file, and finally create a lossless TIFF file.
I do things this way because I want the supposedly more universal format of DNG, and Camera RAW 2.4 (which runs on CS) doesnt officially support the D50 .NEF file.
I cant think of a reason to upgrade either the DNG converter or Camera RAW files. It appears that the new versions basically just support new cameras. Besides, to do so Id have to upgrade to CS3, and thats totally out of the question.
I take about 2,500-3,000 shots a year not counting the ones I take for experimenting with different settings and such. I know some folk might think my process is time consuming and/or overkill to create and retain DNGs AND TIFFs, but Im thinking it just makes sense. Does this workflow make sense to anyone other than myself?
Im going to post this in both the RAW and DNF forums to see who thinks what. Thanks for your opinions!

Ive been hanging around the forums for a couple years now and have learned quite a bit from the others. Perhaps Ive helped others in the meantime. Im thinking thats the intent of the forum. Ive seen people blasted for not being as knowledgeable as some of the others and Ive always thought it's a shame. However, it appears Ive accidentally irritated folk by asking an opinion of something.
I mentioned in the OP that I'll not be upgrading to CS3 or any other version of PS. So by default, and a point not picked up by some- the question is really in regard to the newer version of DNG and NOT Camera RAW.
When I looked at the download page it appeared that the new version of DNG might somehow be connected to RAW. After all, they are in the same .ZIP file. Mr. Knoll was kind enough to point out that the newest version of DNG didnt require a PS upgrade. I should have figured that out myself as its a stand alone program, but by the way it was packaged Anyway, I downloaded the file, and unzipped it. Then ran DNG.
It works fine. Just as the previous version. But what I was asking, and what some people took issue with, was if there were features that had been faulty with previous version, or perhaps previous versions did work with RAW formats from certain cameras. Things like that.
I was thinking Mr. Knoll or another knowledgeable person might respond with Sure, Thomas, the newer version of DNG processes batch files much faster due to an improved bit-handling algorithm or Naw, the newer version of DNG is just compatible with more camera formats, so if the version you have works, no need to upgrade, or maybe even The newer version fixes a few minor issues with converting files over 9 MB in size.
Instead, I was told that I wouldn't be asking such a preposterous, absurd question. if I had read the linked article. Well, prior to my second post, I did read it read it. Its a nicely written article with some great shots of the interface. It touts the new RAW as the best there is, and according to the author, Jeff Schewe, its well worth the price. But I also noticed it said nothing of the new version of DNG. Maybe thats because the article is titled About Camera RAW 4.1.
Thank you, Mr. Knoll and G Sch.

Does iPhone as tethering device make sense?

Why pay to use the iPhone as a tethering device instead of just using the iPhone itself? People using iPhone to tether their iPad in particular doesn't make much sense to me since they pretty much have the same function (one just has a bigger screen).
Does it really make sense to pay another $25 a month to tether the iPad to the iPhone when you can just use the iPhone to do what you need done? I'm asking because it would be nice I guess, but can someone really make a good case for the extra money spent for this?
Message was edited by: Drew9803

Actually there is two prices for Data Service.
iPhone 3G Data Features
Enterprise Data Plan for iPhone
$45.00
N/A
Unlimited
Select
DataPro 2GB for iPhone Enterprise
$40.00
N/A
2GB
Select
DataPro 2 GB for iPhone
$25.00
N/A
2GB
Select
DataPlus 200 MB for iPhone
$15.00
N/A
200MB
Select
iPhone 3G Tethering Features
DataPro 4GB for iPhone Enterprise
$60.00
N/A
4GB
Select
DataPro 4GB for iPhone
$45.00
N/A
4GB
Current
A $15.00 Difference in Cost.....

Does it make sense for kernel_task process to use hundreds of MB of RAM?

I'm not terribly knowledgeable about the UNIX heart of the Mac OS, but I have been troubled by this quirk on my machine for a while now. I can't figure why the kernel_task process on my machine seems to take triple the "Real Memory" as it does on every other computer I have looked at.
After starting up, PID 0 regularly grabs about 150 MB before settling down to around 110 MB. PID 0's Real Memory climbs and climbs as the day goes along. Right now, PID 0 is sitting at around 142 MB. My wife's computer, for instance, takes about 40-50MB for PID 0.
It gets even crazier for me as time goes along, I have seen PID 0 (kernel_task) climb regularly as high as 300+ MB of Real Memory. *** is going on that PID 0 is a blackhole for my RAM, and what might I have done that is causing PID 0 to immediately grab nearly triple the RAM as every other mac I have looked at?
Safari in Leopard is just as bad as far as grabbing RAM goes, but at least I can quit Safari to get it back to normal. With kernel_task the only solution I really have to get it to play nice with Real Memory is to restart the computer, right?
Thoughts?

Thanks for the reply! That does assuage my worry a bit. But I still do worry that in Leopard possibly kernel_task isn't then releasing all caches when no longer needed because after glances at Activity Monitor I will see kernel_task climb up into the 300+ MB regularly. And that's after a night of hours web browsing in Safari and reading and replying to email in Mail. Period. Still kernel_task hasn't been as offensive as Safari is at taking memory and not releasing it.
I guess I'll learn to live with it and let my tidy-side let up on this.

Does N make sense for me?

I'm considering the Airport Extreme N router.
Right now I use only an Airport Express. What do I have on my network? iMac with N, Powerbook with G, Apple TV with N, Nintendo Wii, iPhone, and I think that is it.
Now, the main two devices I use that are always on the network are my iMac and Apple TV, which are both N. N for the Apple TV would be nice.
However, the Wii always stays connected to cause it checks for messages and updates from Nintendo constantly. Will the Wii being in its standby mode knock my entire network down to G? I'd get no benefit from N because of the Wii calling home even though the iMac, Airport Extreme, and Apple TV are all N?
Thanks!!

Since you already have an AirPort Express Base Station (AX), you may want to consider getting the 802.11n AirPort Extreme Base Station (AEBSn) and configure them in a "dual band" network. This way 802.11n clients can connect to the AEBSn, and the 802.11g can connect to the AX.
Dual band networks are discussed, starting on page 48, in the Designing AirPort Networks Using AirPort Utility document.

Does no-contract pricing ever make sense?

As a potential new customer, I'm having trouble figuring out the situations where no-contract iPhones would be a good deal. The need to have AT&T voice/data service locks you in anyway. If you end the contract after only a few months, you've paid more for phone and service than you would for phone under contract with early termination fee. If you use it a long time, you've paid the high initial price and the same monthly charges.
So when/why would someone logically opt for a no-contract phone?

Nothing personal, but I couldn't care less why someone would choose to do so. If it falls under the old saying there is a sucker born every minute, then that is the sucker's problem since they can make use of a calculator, paper, and pencil as anyone else can.
This is way more time than I've spent thinking about this before and I don't plan on spending any more time.

K9A2GM V2 mobo with sata III 6.0Gb/sec... make sense?

I have just upgraded to a WD Caviar Black drive capable of 6.0Gb/sec transfer. Does it make sense for me to add a PCI Express Sata III controller to utilize this transfer speed? Or is there a limitation in my mobo that will just "waste" the extra transfer speed. How do I test the current transfer speed of my hard drives?

Quote
I have just upgraded to a WD Caviar Black drive capable of 6.0Gb/sec transfer.
'Capable of' doesn't meant it is 'able to'.
Mechanical hard disks are limited in their transfer speeds by their own physical actions. SATA 6Gb/s is pretty pointless for mechanical hard drives as they are simply not fast enough to utilise the bandwidth available. So no, there would not be any performance increase even if you added a SATA 6Gb/s SATA controller card.

Does an "incomplete font" warning make sense for ttf?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for