Does Cas Latency really make a difference?

I have a MSI K8N Neo2 setup (AMD64 3500) and I am inquiring if memory latency effects are really noticible or not during heavy gaming or creating home movies for DVD's.  Currently, I have two sticks of Corsair Value Select 512MB DDR PC-3200 (VS512MB400).  It has a Cas latency of 2.5.  Is there any good noticible performance reason, I should trade up and buy some better performing memory.  If so, does anyone have a tried and true favorite with the K8N Neo2?  Any thoughts?  I have never overclocked, I just run at stock speeds.  Perhaps the performance gain is not worth the money?  
I also have:
eVGA geforce 6800NU
2- 200 GB Seagate IDE barracuda
Sony DVD burner
Enermax 465 watt PS
Hauppauge PVR 250
Netgear WG311v2
4 case fans
1 GB PC-3200

Spread Spectrum Modulation was invented to reduce interferences of high order
harmonics of the bus frequency. The theory is that, because every wave form
generates higher order harmonic waves or Obertoene, accumulation of the latter
can result in interference with the original signal.
One way to avoid this problem is to subject the base frequency to a slow (ca 100,000 clock cycles) modulation,
 meaning that the FSB varies between e.g. + and - 1% of the nominal value.
In older boards, usually two different settings were available,
either centered around the nominal value or set with the nominal frequency as the maximum (low modulation).
Most current boards employ the centered modulation.
This is, at least, the official version of Spread Spectrum Modulation.
In reality, there are different reasons for its implementation.
With increasing operating frequency, electronic components emit electromagnetic interference signals (EMI).
EMI, on the other hand can cause interferences with other devices and is,
 therefore, subject to regulation by the FCC which limits the signal amplitude according to its guidelines.
Any device exceeding the maximum allowable signal strength will not gain
 approval by the FCC and can, therefore, not be marketed.
In order to understand the reason for SSM, it is necessary to know how the FCC
tests EMI.
Basically, the testing device is a radio receiver and the testing is done by sweeping
its receiving frequency through the frequency range of interest and measuring the
interference with the video and audio signals. The bandwidth sensitivity of the
measuring device is in the order of about 1 MHz.
If the operating frequency is modulated to spread over a bandwidth of typically
4-5 MHz, the same will happen to the EMI spectrum and,
instead of showing a sharp peak, the spectrum will be spread to a more or less
Gaussian bell shape.
In this case, the amplitude will be, of course, substantially smaller, that is,
in the order of 1/3 - ¼ of the original peak.
The energy, however, will be the same. On the other hand,
the measuring instrument with its bandwidth limited to only 1/4 of the spread will,
consequently, only see 1/3 to ¼ of the EMI.
Therefore, the system will obtain FCC approval even if it exceeds the guidelines.
Recommended Settings
If running at stock setting, enabling Spread Spectrum Modulation (SSM)
may reduce EMI, and cause less interference with wireles communication devices.
Under all conditions, enabling SSM may cause a system to crash.
This is especially true for overclocking, simply because with the high multiplier values employed now, even a 0.5% modulation up and down can cause
differences up to as much as 10 MHz clock speed within one modulation cycle.
In other words, if the CPU is already operating at its limit, increasing the clock
speed by another 10 MHz may be fatal.
Therefore, for any overclocking, SSM should be turned off.
Another side effect of SSM is that it can interfere with the clock generator.
This means that, instead of merely initializing SSM, it is possible to enable FSB settings that were never supported by the manufacturer.
Examples are the Tyan Trinity 400 where disabling SSE results in an actual bus
speed of 90 MHz instead of the selected 117 MHz or the MSI 6309 where FSB settings of up to 200 MHz become available.
The reason is that activating SSM can cancel out the FSB setting since there
can be a pin address overlap on the clock generator chip.
(from lostcircuits.com)
Lets say your CPU is putting out EMI , its all concentrated on one "channel/frequency" on the spectrum.
What spread spectrum does is broaden that out to multiple channels/frequencies so it isn't as "potent" or interupting.
http://www.rojakpot.com/default.aspx?location=8&var1=0&var2=115
This is interesting.
Fsb spread spectrum enabled can cause internet dropouts.
http://www.asus.com.tw/support/faq/qanda.aspx?KB_ID=84823
If i can access it in bios i always have it disabled in any computer i'm maintaining.

Similar Messages

  • Does the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M with 4GB really make a difference

    I just bought 27inch late 2012 imac. 3.4ghz i7 32gb ram NVIDIA 680MX 2gb and Im currious does the 780M 4gb really make a difference. I do not play any games. I do have 2 27 lightening bolt displays. I do alot of video editing and photograph. I have all Adobe Products and Apple software but i cannot find any where that the GTX 780m with 4gb will be any better. All I can find is if you play games then 4gb is good.
    Any advice would be great!
    Thank you in advance,

    Certain applications such as Photoshop or Final Cut Pro will benefit from the higher video ram, however the GTX 680M is a very powerful card and the 2GB of ram that it comes with should be more than sufficient for most tasks.
    Only extremely large files/projects will truly benefit from having the 4GB or ram that the GTX 780M supplies.
    The 2013 iMac offers a performance boost over the 2012 version, however the increases in terms of CPU/GPU power are mostly modest.
    The Haswell architecture was designed with mobile use as the primary focus and so areas such as energy usage were the priority.
    The Nvidia 7XX graphics cards run on the same Kepler architecture as the 6XX cards, as with the Intel CPU the improvements are there but there is not a huge leap forward.

  • Does Mackeeper really make a difference on your mac

    Hi, does mackeeper make a diffrence on your mac will it make it fast, protect from viruses, and protect your data. I really need to know, Thanks

    Oh, it'll make a difference, but not in a good way. See below.
    https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-3036
    Stedman

  • Does a THX Cert make the difference on a 65" Panasonic Plasma?

    We're looking to replace a 65" tv in our family/moive watching room.  After a ton of back and forth, we've settled on a Panasonic plasma...either the S1 or V10.  Now, neither are stocked in my Best Buy for me to compare at this size.  I don't care about the Internet options on the V10.  The only difference we care about would be "if" the THX Cert actually makes a difference when watching Blu-Ray.  And if it does, does that really justify an additional $1400 in price.  It's not the $ is not objsect, but this is our movie watching room, we don't plan on replacing it for at least another 5+ years and we just want the best picture we can get.  (Oh, and for watching football too!!!)
    If anoyone has seen both or can guide me either way I'd greatly appreciate it!!!
    Thanks,
    Kear

    Hey Kear! good question- the THX certification is something that Panasonic pays to have on that, the big the the v10 has that the s1 does not is "thx mode", its a picture setting that has more natural colors than "vivid", "cinema", or any other standerd setting. honostly, if the other features do not concern you, i would recommend gettin the s1 and having it calibrated by geek squad- a calibration is basically a reset of all the color setting and they actually cusmotize it to the room it is in, this will give you a better picture than you would get out of THX mode and it will add a few lears to the life of the tv, also the price just dropped to $199 for the calibration! hope this helps!

  • Does using HDMI cables make a difference?

    For this level of video quality, does it make a difference to use HDMI vs. just RCA?

    For this level of video quality, does it make a
    difference to use HDMI vs. just RCA?
    The HDMI connection passes digital signals; the RCA (component) one passes analog signals. In theory, transferring the signals in the digital domain should yield higher quality video, all other things being equal.
    This is because binary digital signals have only two values, on or off, while analog ones have a continuous range of them. Thus, digital transmissions are immune to signal degradations small compared to the 'all the way on' or 'all the way off' signal range, while analog ones are directly affected by them.
    However, because HDMI is a multi-core connection (several conductors are in the cable), & it is desirable to make the cables thin, flexible, & easy to handle, it is more difficult & expensive to manufacture multi-core cables with these & the appropriate electrical characteristics compared to a set of conventional (single-core) cables intended for transmitting individual analog video components.
    Since the electrical characteristics of the cores become increasingly important for passing high quality signals with increasing cable lengths, this generally isn't a concern for short cable runs like most people would use between Apple TV's & other HDMI devices co-located in one cabinet, but is a concern if (for example) the Apple TV must be connected by a long cable to a remote display across the room.
    So basically, go with HDMI (or DVI) for short cable runs. For longer ones, consider both. Distance, cost, & cable space considerations will generally interact to determine which is best for you.

  • Does upgrading your ram to 2GB really make a difference?

    okay, so the obvious answer to the question is yes.
    but when i mentioned i was thinking of doing this upgrade to a close friend (who did ICT A level) he seemed a little skeptical, and said that there are many other factors involved.
    im currently on 768MB of RAM, and i run logic pretty much all the time. but recently, while my sounds are getting a little more complex, the system performance bar is reaching the top (it goes yellow rather than orange)
    so to put my question more accurately...
    will i see a difference with 2GB of ram within logic ?
    and what else can i do to keep that system performance bar down (hard ware wise)

    Increasing RAM will always be of benefit.
    Another issue maybe how much disk space you have left on your hard drive?
    That version eMac shipped with either a 40 or 80 GB drive. If there is 15% or less left on the drive, this maybe an additional reason why Logic is working harder.
    Also, if you haven't done any disk maintenance in a while, like using Tech Tool Pro/Disk Warrior to clean up disk directories and defragment your hard disk, then that would tend to make Logic work harder because it has to constantly, in real time, find all of the audio data bits scattered all over your hard drive. Defragmenting a hard drive would put data that should be contiguous ( located together on the drive as one continuous data stream) back together.
    You need a lots of free disk space when working with large audio/video files.
    Purchasing a larger external Fire Wire drive would be a benefit.
    I use Logic Express 8 on a 1.25 Ghz G4 MDD with 2 GB of RAM.
    I do all of my recording to a external FW drive with plenty of free space.
    Works fairly well on a 6+ year old Power PC Mac. Haven't had too many issues or dropouts.
    This version of Logic on my Mac is not completely trouble-free, but performs well most of the times I have done lots of audio tracks and end up with, somewhat, large audio files.
    My issues are always with adding effects after recording audio as these are very processor intensive and need not only a really fast CPU, but lots O' RAM, too!
    I end up using many of the effects processes very sparingly and/or only on recorded tracks I feel really need to have them. Can't use as many effects or on too many tracks as this has given playback some hiccups and issues.
    It's an issue I can live with until I can, finally, afford a speedier Mac. That's not in the near future for me, though.
    I absolutely love Logic! Great Apple audio program!

  • GTK apps in Qt Environment -- Does it really make a difference?

    Whenever I read around about running GTK apps in KDE, I get a lot of horror stories about how needing to load GTK libraries in the Qt environment will degrade my system performance and bog down my desktop experience. After spending a lot of time in two pretty popular GTK apps (Firefox & Gimp), and monitoring my desktop performance, I've certainly not found anything noticable (other than that they look ugly as sin). Furthermore, I keep a system monitoring widget on my desktop, and it doesn't seem to make a lick of difference on my system resources. Are all the warnings about running GTK in Qt simply horror stories? Has anyone actually noticed a difference from running GTK apps in Qt (or the other way around for that matter)?

    axel668 wrote:no, I've always used GTK apps in KDE (Firefox, Thunderbird, LibreOffice, ...) and never had problems. And there's a great article in the wiki about theming: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Un … plications
    That's a great little wiki page which I just visited, used, and now love. Thank you for sharing!

  • Does a high end graphic card really make a difference ? or is the CPU more important ?

    NVIDIA has the Quadro CX  (very expensive)
    http://www.nvidia.com/object/builtforadobepros.html
    They mainly talk about h264 encoding.
    Does it help as far as timeline editing ?
    Im shooting in HDV but final project is SD MPEG2 for DVD
    Or does a faster CPU work better.  Multiple Cores.
    Is it better to get a faster Quad Core Intel Core i7 Processor ?
    Intel® Core i7-940 Processor (2.93GHz) (Quad-Core)
    or a slower Processor speed but dual ?
    WS DUAL XEON E5504 2.0GHz, 8MB cache, 800 MHz, 4.8 GT/s QPI (Quad-Core)
    WS DUAL XEON E5520 2.26GHz, 8MB cache, 1066 MHz, 5.86 GT/s QPI (Quad-Core)  [+$385 ]
    What role is the graphics card really having.
    I have read some places that as long as you have a good card you don't have to waste money on the top end ones.
    Any thought would be helpful.
    Thanks:  Glenn

    IMO a Quadro CX is a waste of money, unless your editing life consists of only encoding to H264 and even then it may be a waste of money.
    You may be better off with more capable CPU's and a better disk setup.
    Have a look at all three topics linked to here:
    How to get the best from a PC? Some guides...
    Do read them carefully, including the responses, since there is some info on the performance of dual Xeons versus i7 that may help you decide.

  • Does windows or mac make a difference in this scenario?

    I work for a small educational institution planning to produce some of its own material into print format. The final products have the following characteristics:
    Either small A5 booklets (staple on the spine) or thicker books (perfect/glue bound down the spine)
    Either printed in the office (for small batches) or sent to a professional printer (+ binding for large batches)
    Content language range from English to Spanish to Chinese.
    Content format is mainly bw text (like a novel), with the occasional tables and bw graphics (made by outside graphic designers)
    I'm conversant with computers, but have no experience with professional desktop publishing. Here are a few questions in my mind:
    Do we really need to invest in InDesign? Our requirement seems to be achievable using Microsoft Word (as it is now) - except I don't know how well Word interacts with printers for large batch printing.
    How different would InDesign be on Windows and Mac? Obviously the interface may be different given the characteristics of the OS, but will there be substantial advantage of one OS to another in the professional printing world?
    Thanks in advance if you have any advice/opinion/thoughts!
    tim

    Understanding that I do work for Adobe (and have for over twenty years) and that I obviously have a vested interest in people buying copies of InDesign, let me take as honest a stab at answering your two major questions:
    (1)     If you have no real experience with professional desktop publishing, you will find a fairly steep learning curve for InDesign and all of its features. It is not a word processor and some things which may be fairly simple to do if you are fairly good with Microsoft Word may seem very difficult in InDesign. Not that they can't be done, but there is more discipline and factors involved in using this type of software. It is oriented towards serving the needs of those who need to design and execute graphically-rich content for professional publication. Yes, you can type a simple "memo" (remember what those were?) in InDesign, but the overhead of doing so especially if you really aren't at all familiar with this type of software can be quite high. At the same time, you could conceivably use Microsoft Word to do some fairly sophisticated publications, but doing so not only tests the limits of that software, but also your patience and willingness to hack around software limitations. In terms of what you describe as large batch printing, my advice would be the same for both Microsoft Word and InDesign. Create a PDF file from the document and then print the resultant PDF file from either Adobe Reader or Acrobat. If you are going to a commercial printer, that printer will probably appreciate a PDF file (fonts embedded of course) as opposed to a bunch of source files, whether they be Word or InDesign.
    (2)     Assuming that you use either OpenType (either TrueType or Adobe Type 1 - CFF flavoured) or TrueType fonts for the document, Windows or Macintosh is fairly irrelevant in terms of how InDesign works, including the vast majority of its user interface. Contrary to what many Macintosh fanboys would have you believe, InDesign (and for that matter, Illustrator, Photoshop, Acrobat, and other Adobe Creative Suite applications) work at least as well under Windows as on a Macintosh and you can go from one platform to the other without having to learn anything really new. Once the printer has your PDF file, it doesn't make a bit of a difference what platform InDesign was run on!
    In conclusion, you actually seem fairly satisfied with your current Word-based workflow and your documents are really not graphically-intensive. Until such time as you have such needs and the time to learn InDesign, you might be best off staying with Word. For printing from either Word or InDesign, I most strongly recommend that you create a PDF file and print from that. The PDF file should be in logical page order, single copy. Any imposition or booklet-making should be done either in Acrobat/Reader or at the print device itself.
              - Dov

  • Does using 'this.' make _any_ difference to method calls?

    If I'm calling a local method, for example:
    this.doStuff();is it functionally ever under any circumstances whatsoever different to simply doing:
    doStuff();I have quite a vivid memory from a few years ago of a reasonably complex class hierarchy in which I found there to be different behaviour when specifying 'this.' to not specifying it. Was this some sort of hallucination?
    See this has caused me to be paranoid about using 'this.' everywhere I call a local method. Someone asked me why I did it and explained with the story above. However I can't for the life of me re-create the situation.
    Edited by: pete-woods on May 2, 2008 3:51 AM

    There's no difference between calling this.methodName() and calling methodName() directly. as others said, just for clarity.
    however, the only time i almost always use "this" is when passing a constructor args that have the same name as the instance variables in that class in which case i use "this" to avoid naming confusion.
    example:
    public MyConstructor(int x, int y){
    this.x = x;
    this.y = y;
    above the this.x is the instance variable and the single x by itself is the arg.

  • In large PDF files my cursor moves around the page at warp speed. It does not seem to make any difference if I slow it down with Sys Prefs. This is not only in preview but also other programs to open PDFs.

    In large PDF files the cursor moves at warp speed with a mind of it's own, I've tried slowing it down in Sys Pref with no luck. On small files cursor action is normal. This happens in Safari, Preview and other programs that use PDF files. Sorry to say this does not seem to be a new problem with 7.# I've had it with prvevious versions of operating system Right now I'm using a Apple wireless mouse and key board. Using the USB keyboard and mouse the same problem does not go away.

    Please read this whole message before doing anything.
    This procedure is a test, not a solution. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
    Step 1
    The purpose of this step is to determine whether the problem is localized to your user account.
    Enable guest logins* and log in as Guest. Don't use the Safari-only “Guest User” login created by “Find My Mac.”
    While logged in as Guest, you won’t have access to any of your personal files or settings. Applications will behave as if you were running them for the first time. Don’t be alarmed by this; it’s normal. If you need any passwords or other personal data in order to complete the test, memorize, print, or write them down before you begin.
    Test while logged in as Guest. Same problem?
    After testing, log out of the guest account and, in your own account, disable it if you wish. Any files you created in the guest account will be deleted automatically when you log out of it.
    *Note: If you’ve activated “Find My Mac” or FileVault, then you can’t enable the Guest account. The “Guest User” login created by “Find My Mac” is not the same. Create a new account in which to test, and delete it, including its home folder, after testing.
    Step 2
    The purpose of this step is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party system modifications that load automatically at startup or login, by a peripheral device, by a font conflict, or by corruption of the file system or of certain system caches.
    Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards, if applicable. Start up in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. You must hold down the shift key twice: once when you boot, and again when you log in.
    Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the boot volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
    Safe mode is much slower to boot and run than normal, with limited graphics performance, and some things won’t work at all, including sound output and Wi-Fi on certain models. The next normal boot may also be somewhat slow.
    The login screen appears even if you usually log in automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin.
    Test while in safe mode. Same problem?
    After testing, reboot as usual (not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of Steps 1 and 2.

  • Would more memory really make a difference?

    I am running Premiere CS4 on a Windows Vista 64 bit machine with a quad core processor and 4 GB of memory.  No matter what I do in CS4, from rendering effects in Premiere to converting a file in Media Encoder to transcoding video for a blu-ray disc in Encore, I see the same thing in the performance section of task manager - all four cores of my processor at 100% and a maximum of 3 GB of memory being used.  Since my system never wants to use more than 3 GB of memory for any task, would there be any benefit to upgrading to 8 GB of memory?
    J. D.

    I had not planned on upgrading to CS5 because I can't afford the required graphics card to take advantage of the Mercury Playback engine (at least, not right now).  But your answer has piqued my curiosity.  If I upgraded to Premiere CS5, and added more memory to my system, but did not upgrade my graphics card, what sort of improvement in performance might I experience?
    J. D.
    (I did try out CS5 when it came out, but my 30 day trial has ended so I can't run my own test to answer this question)

  • Does thread pool really help

    Friends,
    I wanted your opinion on whether thread pools really help. Some people are of the opinion that thread pools don't really make much difference. On what basis should I make a decision whether to go for a pool or not? Is the reason that I want to limit the number of threads spawned a valid reason for pooling or it depends on the fact that for how much duration each of the threads is going to remain busy?
    Can anyone please comment?
    Thanks,
    praddyB

    sztejkat wrote:
    I have run into a similar question.
    The answer is, as usual, "it depends".
    One delegates work to worker thread if things to be done are too long to wait for completion. This is a true sentence.
    I have found that it is worth to use pool of worker threads if I need to spawn multiple, but not concurently accessing resources, lengthy tasks which should not wait for each other.
    That applies to threads. It provides no basis for pools.
    If tasks are to access same resource there is no point in getting a separate thread for each of them. One may get into many deadlocking troubles.
    Not sure what you mean by that. If you are actually deadlocking on a single resource then you are doing something weird. Deadlocks result due to multiple resources (and incorrect access).
    [http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-10-2001/jw-1012-deadlock.html]
    Blocking on the other hand occurs with a single resource. Obviously if a single resource is used exclusively or primarily in thread processing then either don't use threads or re-arch to split it up.
    Worker thread/pool is usually an application wide resource where one does throw "things to be done in background" or "things which can't hold current thread code flow".
    Threads, pooled or not, can be the primary focus of the application. I would suppose that when someone considers using a pool that in fact in almost all cases the work tasks to be done are either the primary or a substantial part of the processing.

  • What is the best I7 Intel processor to get on the Macbook Pro 15"?  Are these processors 2nd generation processors?  Does it matter?  Should I wait until - when? - for 2nd generation processors to be used?  Does the 2.5 Mh processor make a difference?

    I'm about to order a MacBook Pro 15".  I wonder if the I7 processors are 2nd generation or if it matters.  Also, is there significant benefit to getting the 2.4 or 2.5 Ghz processor over the 2.2?  I'm not a gamer or graphics manipulator, but I do look at (not edit) a lot of video for my work, and I typically multi-task, having many applications and internet windows open at once. Also, I will be running Windows for work access and applications.  Of course, I have little idea what makes a difference in my use experience, except I plan to get max RAM and probably the fastest hard drive.  Any advice welcome.

    Steve,
    I appreciate your focus on assistance, and thank you for your help.  Couple of follow up questions:  What you said about the new specs suggests that the MacBook Pro line has recently been upgraded with, what, the 2nd gen Intel chips, some other incremental improvements?  So maybe it has paid off to crawl along with my old mac to get the latest tech.  For these kinds of upgrades, I guess Apple doesn't advertise that they have the latest chips (I've seen PC ads touting the 2nd gen chips, and checked out the Intel site, so that's how I became aware) and all?
    I'm planning to enjoy this computer for quite some years.  Of course I will get the 3 yr extended warranty.  And I was planning to get the hi res antiglare screen: that seems to be the best of the options.  It looks like one can now get a faster 750 Gb fast drive, instead of having to settle for 500 in the faster version.  The cost does add up, but my feeling was to go for broke and get the best machine I can.  So does getting the faster cpu and hd and max ram (perhaps buying third party) and all make sense, assuming I can afford it when I add everything up, or is it like a moderately good guitar player getting a top of the line guitar he can't really play well enough to warrant it?  (I remember a story about a student under Segovia arriving with a very very expensive guitar when he was still early in the learning process; it may be apocryphal, but story goes that Segovia took the guitar from the student and smashed it to smithereens.  I assume that was not just because the student mistook the instrument for skill in playing it, but perhaps also because he would be too careful with such an expensive instrument, and fail to master it.  Maybe not a perfect analogy, but I could be mislead by seeking the "best barn burner on the block" when what I need is what will work fine for my purposes.) So I think your original response was probably right on in terms of what will actually be of use to me.
    Thanks again,
    David

  • IPhone equalizer does not make a difference

    I set EQ presets to all my songs in iTunes. When I change the EQ settings on my iPhone (3.1) while listening to a song, it does not make any difference to the sound, regardless of the preset I choose.
    Any clues or suggestions? What is the difference between off and flat?
    Yvan

    is your mute switch turned on (above the volume) ?  remove case and screen protecter.
    is volume turned up?
    if so do this
    account security
    Please call apple @ 1-800-692-7753 in USA
    ask for the account security team
    you may want to add a credit card to your iTunes account  before calling; so they will have a way to verify your identity.
    Peace, Clyde
    check # for your country
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HE57
    <Edited by Host>

Maybe you are looking for

  • I have forgotten my keychain password?

    I have forgotten my keychain password.  How do I fix this?

  • Please, take a minut

    Hi, I'm sending vars as querystring to asp, which then with SELECT sentence grabs the right data from DB and creates xml. This XML is then loaded into new swf, which is loaded into MC from the first swf. The problem is that it's working if I don't se

  • Google search re-directed

    Hi. I'm not sure if this is the right place for this but here goes anyway. This may have been covered somewhere else. If so, I apologise. When I type a search into google (using Safari) then click on the link I feel is relevant, the search is re-dire

  • U430 Touch Release Date in Greece

    Hey guys! I'm not sure I'm posting this in the right spot (I don't even know if there is a "right" spot) but after depleting all of other possible methods (like contacting Lenovo Greece and all its official retailers) I remained empty handed and a bi

  • Client update not working due to distribution point

    Since upgrading from 2012-SP1-R2 i haven't been able to upgrade the clients, im fairly sure now after a fair amount of research this is down to the distribution point. I would assume that if there was an issue with the distribution point the update w