Does FCPX support import/editing/export of 1080/60p?

I have a Panasonic HDC-HS900 that shoots 1080/60p. I know it's not part of the AVCHD standard, but I am hoping that FCPX will support this video.

I have the Panasonic TM700 and it will not import these files. Your best bet is converting them to Apple Proress LQ with Clipwrap

Similar Messages

  • Does FCPX support 60p?

    Does FCPX support 60p? 

    Hi Tom,
    I'm using a Sony HDR-CX130 and shooting in 60p for best quality (and hopefully best for FCP editing).
    I downloaded trial version of ClipWrap to enable usage of the MTS files. Your forum discussion headed me in the direction of ClipWarp by the way. My question is which Output Format to use. By the way (and I realize how tedious and time consuming it might be to repeat or paste a link to the info) it would be so very helpful to us new to many of these things to include details of how to use the recommended item. I am guessing that you have ascertained that the "Use ClipWrap" alone can be a wee bit frustrating. Ok, as to the question, I find these available options for output format along with the file size for 1 minute that the trial version will process:
         Rewrap (don't alter video samples)         60.5 MB
         Apple Intermediate Codec (AIC)           427.2 MB
         Apple ProRes 422                               612.9 MB
         Apple ProRes 422 HQ                         915.9 MB
         DVCProHD                                            489 MB
         DV                                                     128.9 MB
         HDV                                                   113.3 MB
    All generated an .mov file.
    I've eliminated the last 3 as they seem to distort the aspect ratio (and resultant image squishing the side making the image taller and thinner than actual.
    I thought I read previous postings from you that indicated one only need to Rewrap. That made the first choice appear to be the appropriate one. When viewing the .mov file with Quicktime, the audio was as expected but the video image lagged, dragged, stuttered, froze while the audio continued as expected. Yes, it is an antique by today's standards - I am using an old G5 and waiting for Apple to come out with a Mac Pro that has a thunderbolt connection but I thought that info might help the diagnosis. In addition, this file entered into FCP brings the machine to its knees as well producing the spinning beachball of death.
    The choices 2-4 above generated a Quicktime file that worked like a charm. I have not attempted to import into FCP as I am thinking I could get the answer to my question more accurately from here rather than a lengthy trial and error session that might also include something I am overlooking - not a pretty site several months down the road.
    Ok, which Output Format should I use when I want the following in order of importance?:
         No loss in quality (that is the reason for HD in the first place)
         Ease of use with FCP
         Fastest when considering editing, final encoding, burning, etc. in FCP and DVD Studio Pro
         Speed with which ClipWrap does its thing.
         Some consideration of disk space but this is very low in the list. Disk space is cheap and I don't mind adding drives. I am planning a large raid storage purchase in the near future that will communicate using thunderbolt.
    Thanks for all your help - you are the best.
    Bruce

  • MS 2.1 'Does not support importing files containing tempo changes' message

    OK, so I've just loaded up the 2.1 upgrade and opened up a couple of existing concerts, and I get the following message:
    +File contains tempo changes+
    +One or more of the files you are importing contains tempo change markers. This version of mainstage does not support importing files with tempo changes.+
    It's a bit of a problem as the dialogue box appears several times during loading, and I have to click 'OK' every time, which adds to the length of time it takes to load up the concert (something I do several times during the course of my set).
    I'm not using any MIDI stuff, just acoustic and electric guitar plus vocal channel strips and playback channels.
    I've tried out some of my backing tracks, which have a ralletando at the back end, and they still seem to slow down properly (which isn't surprising, as they are audio files), and I've also tried setting all the sets back to the concert tempo, which hasn't stopped the issue occurring.
    Any thoughts, anyone?

    Hi Blueberry
    Well, if you mean I put a tempo curve at the end of some of my audio files in Logic, in order to slow down at the end of the song, then, yes, I did do that. However, that still works in MS2.1, and anyway, why would that no longer be allowed, as that is an essential musical function. Also, if the upgrade meant I had to re-do the exporting nearly 200 backing tracks, them I'm afraid it would be back to 2.01 for me.
    Furthermore, I tried starting MS up in 32 bit, and that didn't make any difference either.
    As it is, this problem is (so far) only an inconvenience as it takes longer for me to load a new concert. What I'd like to understand is what does it refer to? and how can I prevent it showing this message?
    Thanks

  • Does Fireworks support saving/editing images in icon format (.ico)?

    Does Fireworks support saving/editing images in icon format
    (.ico)?

    quote:
    Originally posted by:
    Alan Musselman
    By way of a free extension by John Dunning, yes. Check out
    the Fireworks Developer Center Downloads tab. I think its also PC
    only, but not 100% sure.
    Yes, it's PC only. And it can export a FW file to favicon
    format, but FW can't open .ico files and the command doesn't
    support exporting the various bitdepths and sizes that Windows
    icons support.
    It's also available here:
    http://johndunning.com/fireworks/about/ExportAsFavicon

  • Photos does not support external editing like iPhoto. Is there likely to be an upgrade to change this or will I abandon Photos for software that does support editing in Photoshop?

    Photos does not support external editing like iPhoto. Is there likely to be an upgrade to change this or will I abandon Photos for software that does support editing in Photoshop?

    iPhoto does work and there is an upgrade:
    Go to the App Store and check out the Purchases List. If iPhoto is there then it will be v9.6.1
    If it is there, then drag your existing iPhoto app (not the library, just the app) to the trash
    Install the App from the App Store.
    Sometimes iPhoto is not visible on the Purchases List. it may be hidden. See this article for details on how to unhide it.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4928
    One question often asked: Will I lose my Photos if I reinstall?
    iPhoto the application and the iPhoto Library are two different parts of the iPhoto programme. So, reinstalling the app should not affect the Library. BUT you should always have a back up before doing this kind of work. Always.

  • Does FCPX support .exr files?

    Does FCPX support .exr files?

    Industrial Light pioneers this codec; HDR (high dynamic range) file.  I'm not sure FCPX accepts it natively, so you may need to convert it to Apple ProRes first.  What camera are you using that records exr?  Also see link below:
    http://www.openexr.com

  • Does FCPX still import video from MiniDV tape?

    I just went from Snow Leopard to Lion and now my trusty old FCP 6 will not install.  Apple says they're sorry but there's nothing they can do to help.
    So...I'm nervous about FCPX but am willing to learn if it will still import video from my DV deck from tape.  Also, does FCPX do automatic logging and batch capturing from tape like FCP 6 did?  I appreciate any advice.

    ***** that Rosetta is no longer part of Lion and you can't install PowerPC programs.
    I have created partitions on my hard drive and left enough space on one partition to keep Snow Leapard and I have about 3 apps on that partition that are not compatible with Lion and reboot in SL to use those apps.
    If you really wanted to export back to tape after creating a video in FCPX, you can export the video as a Quicktime, reboot in SL, open FCP6, import the video and send to tape.
    Long workarounds to simple soulutions from the past.
    I have FCP7, so I don't have to reboot in SL.
    Message was edited by: tjwaido
    Ha ha, Apple blocked me from saying S u c k s.

  • Does Oracle support "imported" XML schemas

    Hi,
    Does Oracle support XML schemas that import other XML schemas. If so, are there any known problems ?
    Thanks
    John

    I have the same problem:
    A huge and complex .xsd-schema with several include and import statements can't be registered (all referenced documents exist in the repository):
    DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.REGISTERSCHEMA(
    schemaURL => 'http://www.toxinfo.org/namespaces/2004/05/Rosetta#ProtocolEmil',
    schemaDoc => xdbURIType('/ProtocolEmil.xsd').getClob(),
    local => TRUE,
    genTypes => TRUE,
    genBean => FALSE,
    genTables => TRUE
    causes an Error at the first import:
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-31000: Resource 'RosettaSimpleTypeCollection.xsd' is not an XDB schema
    document
    ORA-06512: at "XDB.DBMS_XMLSCHEMA_INT", line 17
    ORA-06512: at "XDB.DBMS_XMLSCHEMA", line 26
    ORA-06512: at line 2
    Editing the schema is not an option for me. Any ideas?
    Thanks!
    Tillmann Cordes

  • Is Panasonic developing a plugin for FCP X that allows you to import Panasonic HDC-TM700 1080/60p footage straight into it without transcoding?

    I've been hearing from a few people on these Support Communities that Panasonic is apparently said to be have been developing some kind of plugin that will let FCP X users import 1080/60p footage from the TM700 straight into the editor, without need for use of third-party software such as Popcorn to transcode the footage into .MOV files. They were also apparently going to release this plugin this summer. Anyone know of some kind of link to some more information about it, or some confirmation that it actually is happening? I really would like to know, as I'm big into the 60p setting on the TM700, and my current workflow has me waiting about 3 or 4 hours each time I go to import any footage. Please let me know!

    Hey guys!
    I just downloaded Clipwrap to import my 60p footage into FCPX. I downloaded the demo and realize it will only convert up to a 1min file.
    When I re-wrap and nativate to my re-wrapped file, I can see (and hear) that it preserves my 5.1. When I play it back, the audio stops about half way (odd). When I import it into FCPX, there is no audio at all. Will FCPX not edit AC-3?
    If I keep the LPCM boxed checked on Clipwrap, I get a mono audio file.
    Can someone step out a workflow for me that gets me re-wrapping in Clipwrap, retaining 5.1 and editing in FCPX?
    Thanks for any help!

  • Does Elements support imported closed-captioning?

    Using Elements 2.0.  Ripped a self-produced DVD containing closed captioning on it (line 21); added that media to Elements; the resulting exported MPEG had no closed-captioning on it, or none was detected by the "ccextractor".  Trying to determine if the closed captioning is lost in Elements, or if the MPEG player does not recognize line 21 - it's an Adtec Soloist Pro-HD.  Thanks for any suggestions or help.

    PrE supports no CC, or Subtitles (the real ones, and not just lower-thirds burned into the video).
    I do not believe that PrPro will do this either.
    Now, going the other direction, Encore, the authoring app bundled with PrPro, will allow Line 21 on DVD-Video (and BD, IIRC), but that is the wrong direction.
    Since Line 21 is a function to be dictated via menu (or remote) on a DVD-Video, I rather doubt that you'll find many, if any, NLE's that can rip it off the DVD.
    Good luck,
    Hunt

  • Does Numbers support importing dynamic XML web data into spreadshit?

    I am trying to find a similar functionality that I've been using in MS Excel (Windows platform). In excel, I am able to import an xml (residing in the cloud) into a sheet and work on data and update the base data whenever I request.
    Is there a similar feature in Numbers, or in Mac OS where I can work with XML data residing in the web.
    Note: Although Windows version of Excel supports this, Mac version does not. Is this some kind of OS limitation?
    Thanks,

    In Numbers '09 there is the function HYPERLINK() described as:
    HYPERLINK
    The HYPERLINK function creates a clickable link that opens a webpage or new email message.
    HYPERLINK(url, link-text)
    • url:  A standard universal resource locator. url is a string value that should contain a properly formatted universal resource locator string.
    • link-text:  An optional value that specifies the text that appears as a clickable link in the cell. link-text is a string value. If omitted, url is used as the link-text.
    Examples
    =HYPERLINK(“http://www.apple.com”, “Apple”) creates a link with the text Apple that opens the default web browser to the Apple homepage.
    =HYPERLINK(“mailto:[email protected]?subject=Quote Request”, “Get Quote”) creates a link with the text Get Quote that opens the default email application and addresses a new message to [email protected] with the subject line Quote Request.
    It's what is the closest feature available.
    Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE samedi 18 juillet 2009 10:30:29)

  • Importing edited exports?

    Hello, I am having a problem importing files that I have already edited and exported to a subfolder. When I try to import them again, they appear grey'd and unable to be selected. I thought that maybe the images are still in lightroom but I don;t see them in the library. Any help?

    In the export dialog, after choosing a named sub-folder, try putting a checkmark in the box to Add to This Catalog. See image below:

  • Does FCPX support 1080p?

    I have a Canon HF G10 that is set to shoot in recording mode MXP with a fram rate of 60i.  When i import the video into FCPX i see 1920 x 1080 | 29.97 fps 1080i HD under the info tab for each clip.  How do i get it to 1080p?

    nicolefromgambrills wrote:
    …  Do i get better results with 1080i 60i or 1080p 24fps?
    60i is easier, with correct settings 24p is better, and I slightly disagree with sensei Wolsky …
    https://sites.google.com/site/karstenschluter/i-or-p-this-is-the-question
    was a short, illustrated essay I once wrote in this neverending debate ....
    due to its inherent blurriness, interlaced feels, esp. on fast (horizontal) subjects, better.
    for the price of a resolution loss.
    you can accomplish a 'better' smoothness when following basic rules of cinematography, using a slow shutter-speed - which results in 'natural' motion-blurr.- for most situations, that means with the aid of ND-filters.-
    but …
    if you like to use the material for adding effects, esp. tools like Optical Flow, plugins as Twixtor, short shutter speed is needed, therefor 'better'.-
    nicolefromgambrills wrote:
    …  jerking the camera around, …
    avoid that.
    or, stabilize it, manually, attaching weights to cam, fly-pods, in-cam-features.-
    esp. any vertical movements create odd effects by using interlace.
    the (in)famous 'movie look' every video-cam hobbyist is panting for is based NOT upon frame-rate, but upon achievable slow shutter-speeds. and 24fps would allow down to 1/48th - which gives wonderful blurry pics.-
    on the other hand, in context with Jackson's Hobbit in HFR, it was noticed that a younger audience prefer the blurry-free, but smooth 'electronic' look.- different viewing habits.
    you're using a beast of a cam - I assume, the correlations of iso / f-stop / sec is familiar to you
    finally, here, another very interesting read
    http://magazine.creativecow.net/article/the-truth-about-2k-4k-the-future-of-pixe ls
    (sometimes a bit too technical, but .... read it anyhow!)

  • Does fcpx support panasonic lumixG5?

    The title says it. I see from the list over supported cameras that g3 is listen as supported, but I wonder if annonse kones if the lumix g5 is supported. Looks like a good camera for my use, but it's a dealbreaker for me that I can import the film I capture straight into fcpx without any hassle.

    http://www.dpreview.com/previews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g5
    Sure looks like it will be more than fine. Lots of camera/camcorders aren't listed, though they work fine.
    Hugh

  • What's the best way of importing, editing, exporting and watching AVCHD videos without losing quality?

    Whenever I import AVCHD (.mts extension files) to Final Cut Pro X (via Import from camera), iMovie, Adobe Premiere Elements 10 or Adobe Premiere Pro CS4; when I later export those videos to any format I can imagine, I can't get the same quality than when I play them through the camera connected by HDMI to TV (the camera's movements are not any smooth).
    How have you solved this problem? Is it just me?
    By the way, maybe the problem is in watching: what apps do you use to play the exported media? Do you watch the final videos just on TV? Do you create blu-ray discs?
    I was also wondering what would happen if I created a blu-ray image, have you tried this?
    Thanks in advance,
    Pol

    My video was shot by a Canon HF100 at 1440x1080 25fps 1080i 25i (interlaced) and imported to Final Cut Pro X without transcoding to ProRes (1st time) and transcoding (2nd time).
    The project settings are set to: set automatically based on 1st video clip (so they're 1440x1080 1080i 25i) and I used to leave Audio and Render to default settings (Surround, 48kHz, ProRes 422), but I have also done a few tests with ProRes 422 HQ and Uncompressed 10-bit 4:2:2. Should I try with ProRes 4444?
    I usually export the project using Current settings (in video codec), and I've also burned an AVCHD DVD (I plybacked it on PlayStation 3 - also looked choppy). I've also exported to H.264 codec.
    The video looks choppy on Mac played by Quicktime and VLC. The video I could export to MP4 also looked choppy on PlayStation 3 and Samsung LED TV.
    Thanks for taking your time,
    Pol

Maybe you are looking for