Does firefox 5 support wide gamut or profiled monitors or sRGB, Adobe RGB, or ProPhoto RGB files?

How does ff5 support sRGB, AdobeRGB, and or ProPhoto RGB? How does ff5 support profiled monitors?

Similar Messages

Why does PS 7 not recognize Adobe RGB files?

I have an Olympus E-620 DSLR. When I set the color space in the camera to sRGB, after downloading the images, when I click to open them in Photoshop 7, the images are properly identified as sRGB files. When I set the color space in the camera to Adobe RGB, Photoshop does not recognize the format. Please see the picture below.
Question 1: Why does Photoshop not recognize the Adobe RGB files?
Question 2: What can I do to make Photoshop recognize Adobe RGB files?
Question 3: If I assign in Photoshop the Adobe RGB profile to an unrecognized Adobe RGB file, does that even make any sense? Is the "extra data" that Adobe RGB offers compared to sRB even there even if the profile is not recognized in the first place?
I am very grateful for any comments and advice!

Buko. wrote:
Are you saying that the file is really AdobeRGB and because PS7 is so old its defaulting to sRGB? which is why you are assigning?
Yes...if the file name starts with an underscore _IMG12345 then the image is indeed in Adobe RGB. It's a failure and limitation of the EXIF spec that only allows for two different EXIF tags relating to color space...either sRGB or "unspecified".
Since the camera makers wanted to offer Adobe RGB as a color space choice in camera JPEGs, the underscore was the ONLY way to say whether a file was in sRGB or Adobe RGB. Note that camera JPEGs do NOT have an embedded profiles, just the EXIF tag. And yes, Photoshop 7 is/was too old to understand the Adobe RGB underscore color space.
A lot of stuff has changed (sometimes radically) since that piece of software was released...heck, there wasn't even a Camera Raw until about 9 months AFTER Photoshop 7 was released. Camera Raw 1.0 was released Feb. 19th, 2003, Photoshop 7 was released about April 2002.

Does Firefox 4 support remote Javascript debugger?

I have used ChromeDevTools Eclipse plugin and V8 debugger protocol for remote Javascript debugging with Chrome browser.
Does Firefox 4 support remote Javascript debugger?
If then, is there a client tool like ChromeDevTools plugin?
Thanks in advance.

Symantec have made an update for their add-ons to work in Firefox 4, but they only listed them as compatible with Firefox 4.0, they need to update them to let them work in Firefox 4.0.1. For details see http://community.norton.com/t5/Norton-Internet-Security-Norton/Norton-product-compatibility-with-Firefox-Updates/m-p/443808

Does Firefox OS support the use of VPN's?

Simple question, does Firefox OS support the use of VPN's? If not is it a feature that will be added? And if so, when?

Thank you for your interest and for purchasing a device! The bug reported has went through some employees. I'm sure that we'll get something done shortly.

Does Firefox OS support carddav, and tasks in caldav?

I manage a lot of my day-to-day life on an instance of ownCloud which I access on the desktop using Thunderbird with Lightning, and on Android using various DAV apps. I'm thinking of switching to Firefox OS, but I need to know if the caldav calendar in Firefox OS supports tasks? Also, while we're on the subject, does Firefox OS support carddav as well?

Firefox does support CalDav for the calendars. You can configure the calendar using caldav following these instructions [[Adding calendars on Firefox OS]] . As for CardDav, the support, it is still not available. It is under consideration, and you could request for adding this feature by voting on this bug [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=859306 CardDav support in FirefoxOS]
Hope that helps.

Why does firefox drop support for a plugin with an update

Why the H*ll does Firefox drop support for a plugin when there is an update in Firefox.
FF4 has reported that 6 of my plugins that work fine in 3.6 are now not supported. !! This is a joke, and happens regularly.
As a user (a highly IT literate one) this is annoying and frustrating, and from a design standpoint, unprofessional.

Plugins as in Flash, Java, quicktime or such or do you mean Extensions ?
Plenty of Plugins seems to be detected and in use by Firefox 4.0 just fine according to your system details by your post.
If you meant Extensions then check for updates, look at addons.mozilla.org or the Extension homepage for to see if the author has provided a update.
Generally Extensions can need anywhere from a simple maxversion bump to a lot more for it to work properly on a new Major version of Firefox depending on what the Extension does.
It is professional actually as extensions that were not actually compatible may actually cause problems big or small if they were to still just ''work'' in a new Major version release so hence the need for them to be properly up to date on any changes and hopefully the extension author is quick about it.

Best way to configure Photoshop workflow settings when source photos are shot in AdobeRGB, edited using a wide gamut display, and output to sRGB?

Being able to quickly produce finished photos is of importance with the majority of my photography work. Therefore I shoot, process, and deliver JPEG files. For this time sensitive workflow there is no benefit to my clients by my shooting RAW. I do want to be able to accommodate any possible future uses of the photos, so I shoot using the Adobe RGB color space. The output for my clients are JPEG images for use on the Web, therefore sRGB. I currently used a wide gamut display (NEC PA302W) with a 24-bit graphics card. (I plan on upgrading to a 30-bit card sometime in the future.)
I've noticed that in Internet Explorer the reds in my finished photos are overly intense on my display. My photos look fine in other web browsers on my display. This situation has me concerned as I do not know exactly why it is happening since my photos have the sRBG color profile embedded and IE supports embedded color profiles. If anything, I would think the reds would be overly intense in other applications that do not support embedded color profiles.
Please let me know if my workflow can be improved, outside of shooting RAW and using a 30-bit display:
Shoot JPEG photos in Adobe RBG color space
Edit photos in Photoshop using wide gamut display, 24-bit
Color Settings: Monitor Color (Monitor RGB - PA302W, calibrated)
Save for Web, JPEG, Embed Color Profile, Convert to sRGB
While working in Photoshop the reds appear fine. When saving for the Web and previewing 'Monitor Color' the reds are intense, when previewing 'Internet Standard RGB (No Color Management)' the reds appear fine. The final saved images look fine with the exception of when displayed in IE, which supports embedded color profiles- Color Management.

You're rapidly making a mess out of this. Stop, sit back, and stop thinking there's a "problem" to "fix". There isn't - you just need to use software that is color managed. That disqualifies IE right off. Stop using it, throw it away. It's useless with wide gamut displays. Use Firefox, which has proper color management.
OK. Save For Web in sRGB, embed profile. So far so good. But:
Don't ! set your working space to Monitor Color!. That turns off display color management which is the very last thing you want with a wide gamut monitor. You could sort of get away with that with a standard gamut monitor, because it's not all that different from sRGB anyway. So you wouldn't notice the difference (but it's there). The fact that your Adobe RGB files look right in Photoshop is purely coincidental. Any other profile will look wrong.
With a wide gamut display you absolutely and unconditionally need a fully color managed pipeline. That means 1. an embedded document profile, 2. a valid display profile (Spectraview or other calibrator), and 3. an application that reads both profiles and does the conversion from one to the other as the image is sent to the display.
See, it's not just the document profile. That's half of it. The other half is the display profile. IE doesn't use the display profile, instead substituting sRGB. And that's very wrong with that monitor. Firefox is fully color managed if there is an embedded document profile. But it can be configured to color manage even if the image is untagged (and a lot of material on the web is untagged). It does this by assigning sRGB to the image.
To configure this - and you really need that with a wide gamut monitor - type "about:config" without the quotes in the address bar and hit reload. Scroll down to gfx.color_management.mode, and change it from 2 to 1. Relaunch. All web material will now appear correctly regardless.

How do I convert iris print profile to direct to print rgb file on g5

Good morning, everyone
I am kind of new at this whole color Management business.
>my question is what is the best way to convert
a raw Photoshop PSD file on a MAC G4
which is profiled to print on an IRIS printer
to a direct print RGB file printed from Mac g5 using an Epson 11880.
> Is there a tutorial about printing profile conversions.
Please help

Porefungus,
Your question isn't very clear, which probably has something to do with being new to color management. For color management to work, every file has to be "tagged" with a profile, or if not tagged, one needs to be "assumed". RGB images in Photoshop are usually tagged as sRGB, Adobe RGB, ProPhoto RGB, or some other variant. This "tag" gives precise meaning to each individual color in the file. For example. 225R, 40G, 25B is definitely a red, but what hue, saturation and brightness of red? It will be translated differently depending on which RGB tag is associated with the file.
The same is true of printer profiles. In fact, these profiles (or tags) are like languages. In order to understand what someone is saying, you have to start by knowing, or assuming, what language they are speaking. Sometimes you have someone who speaks only English and someone else who speaks only Chinese. In this case, you need a translator in the middle who is fluent in both. That is color management.
If your original file is edited in Adobe RGB (ie, tagged with that profile) and you are sending that file to be printed on an RGB printer (it uses CMYK and other inks, but the data stream being sent to the printer is RGB), you need to have a "profile" for your printer/paper/ink combination that accurately describes what that ink/paper combo is capable of doing. Then you need a middle man to translate from your source profile (in this case, Adobe RGB) into language that your printer is capable of understanding (ie, printer profile). That middleman is*L*a*b* color space, the universal translator for ICC based color management.
It is way too involved to get into in depth on a forum, but I have some articles on color management on my website. Use the link below and click the links to the left of the page to read them.
http://www.dinagraphics.com/color_management.php
Real World Color Management is a good book on the subject. There are plenty of other good resources in books and on the internet.
Lou

Why does Firefox not support Trusteer Rapport to download?

Trusteer website states that Firefox does not support Rapport.

It's not up the Firefox to support Trusteer Rapport, they need to support Firefox - and they do! But you're using a Beta, pre-release version that they choose not to support.
Install the Firefox 34 Release version and it should work fine.
https://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html

Does Firefox fully support Windows 8.1 64-bit?

It appears from the web that the current Firefox browser does not fully support Windows 8.1 64-bit. Is an updated version planned that will fully support Windows 8.1 64-bit, and if so when is the expected release?

the current version is firefox 26 - 27 is going to be released this week. if you download either of those, you'll just get the normal firefox browser on desktop as you're used to. firefox 28 which is also going to be released as beta this week will include a (minimalist) touch-optimized version of firefox for the windows metro ui...
https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/channel/

Does Firefox OS support Bluetooth 4.1?

Firefox OS devices currently on sale only come with Bluetooth 2.1 or 3.0, but I was wondering if Firefox OS supports version 4.1?
Will Firefox OS plan on supporting any of the new Bluetooth protocols in the future?
Bluetooth Smart, Low Energy, BLE

Hi dleggo,
It will be longer than that until version 2.2 is available on commercial devices available for purchase in stores. After the Code Complete date, our partners spend time doing certification and optimizing for specific devices, before it's launched on commercial devices.
However, it's possible to compile and flash the code onto rooted devices, if you are technically savvy. The Flame Reference device is the best one for this, since it's the same one used by developers at Mozilla.
- Ralph

Why does Firefox not support flash in Vista any more?

I have a laptop with Vista on it and all year long I have had a hell of a time putting up with the new glitches in Firefox.
I simply want the damn thing to be able to use the flash plugin. Every single ******* time Firefox updates, I lose the ability to view flash content. Clicking on the "install missing plugins" logo takes me through *seemingly* successful installs, but it doesn't really install and the next time I load firefox it still says "click here to install missing plugin."
I have also downloaded the executable from adobe and run that (as an administrator, with firefox closed out) and I still get a *successful* installation that results in total failure, e.g. it's still not installed.
Several firefoxes ago I found a website where I could download the two files needed (the dll and the other file) and I manually placed them in the plugins folder which allowed me to use flash until the damn update to the next firefox release wiped it out. The place I downloaded those files from no longer hosts them, so I'm SOL.
Please either start to support Vista again, or declare that you aren't going to. I'm sick and tired of firefox nowadays, even though I've been using it since before version 1.1.
Please, please, please just fix this problem.

There are 2 versions of Adobe Flash; an '''ActiveX version''' for IE only and a '''Plugin version''' for most other browsers including Firefox. On a Windows system, you should always update both individually. '''''You do not have the Plugin version installed in Firefox; if you did, you would see "Shockwave Flash (version)" in Add-ons > Plugins.'''''
#'''Using Firefox''', go to the following direct download link and SAVE the download to your desktop so you can find it later: http://fpdownload.adobe.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player.exe
#When the download is finished, close Firefox (File > Exit '''''OR''''' Firefox button > Exit)
#Click or double-click on the file you just saved to your desktop
#*In the installation window that appears, click the box to the left of "I have read and...." to place a check mark in the box
#*The "Install" button in the lower right corner will now be highlighted, click it.
#*The installation is quick.
#Start Firefox and test your installation here: https://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/
#Direct link ActiveX version for IE '''''only''''': http://fpdownload.adobe.com/get/flashplayer/current/install_flash_player_ax.exe
<u>NOTE: You no longer need to place Flash components in the Mozilla Firefox\plugins folder. Doing so, will leave you with an outdated plugin and a possible conflict between competing versions of the Plugin.</u> Most current plugins are recognized by/installed into Firefox through Windows registry entries. In a clean installation of current Firefox versions, the plugins folder is no longer created in the Mozilla Firefox program application folder. However, the folder can be created and any plugins placed there will be used. It is best not to have the plugins folder unless absolutely necessary to make a particular plugin work.
You can get both versions on the following page, but there is no link directly to it. Click on item ''6. Download and install Adobe Flash Player (Firefox)'' near the top of the page, then scroll down to "Advanced Troubleshooting" just following the Firefox information; the links are in item 1 under that heading:
*http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/191/tn_19166.html
'''If this reply solves your problem, please click "Solved It" next to this reply when <u>signed-in</u> to the forum.'''

Does firefox 5 support internet download manager

latest versions of Firefox does not support internet download manager . does they?

Internet Download Manager v6.07 support Firefox 4, 5 & 6.
http://www.internetdownloadmanager.com/

Does Nokia 6234 support the bluetooth PBAP profile...

Can you help ?
And, in negative case, how can I get the full list of Nokia phones that support the PBAP functionality ?
Thank you !

For the public record, here's the feedback I submitted based on Allan's suggestion. Thank you both, guess I'll just cross my fingers and hope others share their feedback in a positive way to Apple too.
I'd sure love to take advantage of Ford Sync's ability to read aloud and let me interact with bluetooth text messages by voice. However it requires phones to support the Bluetooth Message Access Profile (MAP) like Android and other phone manufacturers.
Humbly requesting this is something that gets added to a future iOS update.
It's not Siri I'm interested in, just this particular feature to allow the phone to interact with my vehicle by using the vehicles embedded voice and heads-up display commands.
Advantages:
(1) Gives one less reason for Apple people to stray to Google
(2) Saves lives too for those who refuse to not read/reply to texts while driving
(3) Keeps drivers behaving legally (outside of common sense, many provinces and states have enacted laws to try and protect people against themselves)
(4) A critical enterprise feature if Apple is attempting to continue to break into that market, most fortune 500 companies that have employees using fleet vehicles use Ford, but frankly other manufacturers coming to market with these features too.
Thanks for consideration around this feature. If you'd like to understand the use-case more or be pointed to threads in the discussion forum and 3rd party websites begging for this feature, happy to discuss.
Kind Regards,
Brian R. Kneebone

Does firefox browser support 128-bit SSL?

I am trying to access a bank i work for who just upgraded their system.

Firefox supports 256 bit since 2002 in Firefox 2, so 128 bit is no problem.
* https://www.fortify.net/sslcheck.html
If websites complain about 128 bit encryption not available then that can be caused by the "U;" that is no longer present in the Firefox 4 user agent.
*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_agent#Encryption_strength_notations
You can see the current user agent on the Help > Troubleshooting Information page.
You can try to add "U;" via variations for the user agent setting like posted below via the pref general.useragent.override to see if that works.
If you update Firefox then you need to adjust the Gecko (rv:) and Firefox version to reflect the currently installed version.
Some examples (Vista is 6.0 - Windows 7 is 6.1):
* Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; U; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1
* Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1
* User Agent Switcher: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/59

Does firefox 5 support wide gamut or profiled monitors or sRGB, Adobe RGB, or ProPhoto RGB files?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for