Does Groupwise 7 support imap idle command?

does Groupwise 7 support imap idle command?

On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:26:03 +0000, clpipkin wrote:
> Well since Danita submitted it back in 2006 I really don't think there
> is much of a chance it ever being included in any future releases of GW.
> I'm sure its still there in the enhancement pile.
Perhaps not, but the more people that request it the better the chances.
It only takes a few minutes to submit one yourself.
http://www.novell.com/rms
Joe Marton
Novell Knowledge Partner

Similar Messages

  • IMAP 'IDLE' Command for Push e-mail - how to enable in 10.4.8 Server?

    Hi all -
    I'm getting a brand new Treo tomorrow, and there's software for the Treo which allows it to have true Push e-mail when used with a mail server that supports the IMAP 'IDLE' command. I'm running a G5 Xserve with 10.4.8 Server, fully updated.
    So, I've read conflicting things about whether the Cyrus imapd as implemented by Apple in OS X Server 10.4.8 supports this.
    Can anyone give me a reasonably definitive answer as to:
    a) Does the existing IMAP implementation support 'IDLE' and,
    b) If so, does it need any changes (config file or other) to be enabled?
    Thanks in advance!

    OK - thanks!
    a capability does indeed show IDLE, and Chatteremail is receiving pushes perfectly! Thanks for a specific, knowledgable, and right-on-target reply!
    For the others interested, Versamail doesn't play this game - it will only handle timed e-mail checks.
    Chatteremail (available at http://www.chatteremail.com) seems to be the preferred 'Push' software for Treos, and in the 30 minutes I've had it installed, it seems to work perfectly with my OSX Server IMAP, getting live pushes (it actually seems to take a couple minutes), and correctly synchronized with my desktop account.
    I'm now a happy and fully-Push-enabled Treo user!

  • Apple Mail doesn't support IMAP IDLE

    I had started using Entourage for a while just for testing since I had reacently started using a new IMAP server and I wanted to see how all the different email software behaves differently so that I can know what everyone will expect to see. Probably my favorite feature of the IMAP4rev1 protocol is IDLE. This feature gives the client the ability to stay connected to server so that the second an email comes in, it is "pushed" to the client.
    This is very different from the way that with POP3 and HTTPmail that you need to poll the server. Here's the real bummer for me though, my absolute favorite email client, Apple Mail, DOESN'T SUPPORT 'IMAP IDLE'!!!!!!!
    I beg you Apple to please realease a new version of Apple Mail that supports IDLE properly so that the client can stay connected to the IMAP server.
    Other not as important feature requests/bugs that I have:
    * CRAM-MD5 authentication on SMTP doesn't work for me in Apple Mail even though my server supports it and it works fine in other email clients
    * A three pane vertical view similar to Entourage/Outlook... It would just be a nice option
    * Ability to hide individual IMAP folders aka Unsubscribe
    * AND ONCE AGAIN PLEASE SUPPORT IDLE!!!
    Now if I have this all wrong and there is some way to turn IDLE on that is a hidden setting, someone please tell me. I'd be interested in hearing what someone from Apple has to say about this missing feature. Thank you!
    1.5GHz 15" PowerBook Aluminum   Mac OS X (10.4.3)   2GB RAM, 60GB 7200 RPM HD, SuperDrive, iSight

    No, all this does is download all of my emails and cache all of them locally (regardless of what folder they are in). I wouldn't want this to happen because I definitely have over 100MB stored on my email server.
    IDLE is something entirely different... I'm still hoping to get a reply from Apple.
    If anybody else is annoyed with this please file a feature/bug request/submit form at www.apple.com/macosx/feedback/ so that we can try to get this resolved soon via some sort of update. OS X 10.5 is still a ways away so I'd definitely like to see an update to 2.05 before we get to 3.0.

  • Does iOS support IMAP IDLE on the iPhone?

    If not, when is it going to be implemented? I have iOS 5 on my iPhone 4 at present, and I only have the option of setting my IMAP accounts to Fetch on 15 minutes intervals.
    Implementing IMAP would be rather trivial for Apple and a god send to those of us who have many IMAP accounts.

    Sorry for bumping this old thread out.... but its iOS 8 is comming.
    First of all
    > It's the, you know, constant and persistent part. I.e. the fact that the connection is kept alive all the time.
    This is BS. RFC suppose to use idle notify as 29mins, so it is going to wake up phone every 29mins, or every email arrives. So in case if you set your mail app to poll mail every 15 mins and you haven't any mail received in that period, your poll was useless, I mean your performance already has lost to imap idle. By the way, you think apple's push work differs from sending alive msgs or actual data to openned socket?...
    Sorry, that was to clear things
    Does anyone know if finally apple decided to add imap idle support to ios8??

  • IMAP-IDLE Command Broken

    Hi all,
    I converted to an IMAP Gmail account two weeks ago, and became hooked to the instantaneous mail downloads thanks to the IDLE command. Now, all of a sudden, emails no longer arrive unless I click on "Get Mail." I have not changed my preferences and the "Use IDLE command if the server supports it" box is still checked.
    I just got off the phone with an Apple rep. who told me that having "Check for New Messages" set to "Manually" was my problem... but I know that she was wrong, as I've been receiving instant messages for two weeks now.
    Your help is appreciated.

    I am also having the same issue and have not been able to find a solution. It just 'stopped' working a few weeks back.
    I have tried deleting and setting up new IMAP account , changing settings...nothing works.
    Message was edited by: mrhud

  • Does BB 9780 support IMAP?

    Can anyone advise if the 9780 supports IMAP? On my iPhone or droid I can see and utilize all my folders within my email account, on my BB I can't seem to do that. I'm not on a enterprise just using work (exchange) or simple AT&T email account.
    Does anyone have any info on this?

    Hey wayneholbrook,
    All BlackBerry smartphones do support IMAP integrations.  However you will not be able to view the email messages in your other folders.  It will only look at inbox on the IMAP server.
    -ViciousFerret
    Come follow your BlackBerry Technical Team on Twitter! @BlackBerryHelp
    Be sure to click Like! for those who have helped you.
    Click  Accept as Solution for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

  • Open letter to Nokia Messaging dev team: imap idle...

    Hi,
    I would like to ask the developers of Nokia Messaging if they are aware of the fact themailclient in the E72 isn't supporting Imap IDLE anymore.
    Before, in the E71 for example, there was indeed a timesetting in the native client BUT this was used when the client got disconnected. for example:client connected > phonecall arrives, client disconnects > phonecall ends > client connects after 5 minutes (or any other timespan accoridng to the settings) and STAYS connected.
    Nokia Messaging: if you set it up at 5 minutes it checks every 5 minutes for mail. This is NOT 'idling' on a server. 'Idle' means in this case 'stay connected, just sit there and wait for messages')
    the specs on your site CLEARLY state for the E72:
    Supported protocols: IMAP4 (with idle), Nokia Messaging, Microsoft ActiveSync, POP3, SMTP
    This means that the product that i have bought IS NOT DOING what you promise. I could probably solve with start using Nokia Messaging but this and was never my intention. I just the phone to do what it is supposed to do: imap idle without the use of Nokia Messaging as stated in its specs (as it was before by the way).
    WOULD APPRECIATE AN ANSWER!
    Called Nokia support in Belgium. No answer from them.

    We are far from being Nokia enemies. If anything, we are giving them free feedback. In corporate circles, concerned companies pay millions of bucks to the likes of Pricewaterhouse, etc to do strategic consulting, ie to tell them what really is right or wrong with their company, products, etc. In the new millenium, the internet and tools such as forums provide similar service, only at a fraction of the cost and a damningly honest one too!
    My take on the matter is this: sure Nokia staff are reading these forums and laughing at us 'idiots'. The 'noise-makers' are few and far between. Nokia also has their die-hard fans (some people have never used any of the advanced features on their phones so would know little) as well as their own 'plants' (ppl who are Nokia employees tasked with dropping feel-good stories in various threads. I've done enough corporate consulting to know this ;-)
    The same person who was supporting Nokia in this thread also had an extended argument with me in the afore-mentioned thread. Some people think someone having 300 odd contacts is a power-user (I have in excess of 1,300 contacts, 90% current and active). Some people questioned my desired to be able to snooze an alarm for a user defined period (that Nokia lover accused me for wanting "more bells & whistles than Fort Knox").
    The last example is something simple that can implemented. My Palm circa 2003 had that feature. Say if an alarm sounds for a set event, but you are still in a meeting/busy, wouldn't it be gud to be able to snooze the alarm for a specified period, say 40 mins? At the moment, the E72 only lets you set ONE global snooze period which applies for all alarms.
    The way I see it Nokia with its so-called business series of devices have 2 probs - (1) it has many bugs and high-end features that do no work as promoted / advertised, and (2) it lacks many simple features that cheaper/older phones have. Can't be too difficult for those Finns to decipher this, can it??
    And what would happen to Nokia? Well, I think its getting so big headed in recent times that its alienating a lot of serious / old-time fans. In todays market, there is great variety of choice. If one is to get buggy and ill-designed products anyway then why pay premium dollars for a Finnish lemon when you can settle for a similar lemon (and at times with almost enuff bells & whistles to challenge Fort Knox) from say China, at a fraction of the price. And to think that many of these Chinese clones today ship with dual SIM capability as well as a (fuzzy no doubt) TV monitor!
    My advice to folks out there, please do buy a Nokia if you are in the market for a cheap, no-frills phone to be used as a spare phone or on those mountain camping trips when a gud flashlight is required. But if you are looking for a serious BIZNESS SMARTPHONE, the E72 is definately not it. Still love you, darling!
    There ought to be laws out there on the use of the term 'smartphone'

  • IMAP MOVE command not being used? (server supports it)

    I created an IMAP log, to see whether TB was using the IMAP "MOVE" extension. Despite the fact that my IMAP server does appear to support it, I can't see any MOVE commands in my protocol log. The only times the string "MOVE" appears in log is the CAPABILITY response from the server. FWIW, here is the capability string:
    [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND URL-PARTIAL CATENATE UNSELECT CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE QRESYNC ESEARCH ESORT SEARCHRES WITHIN CONTEXT=SEARCH LIST-STATUS SPECIAL-USE BINARY MOVE NAMESPACE QUOTA]
    Note that I moved a message BETWEEN mailboxes, if that makes a difference. (if it only works intra-mailbox, then I can't make use of it)
    What exactly should I see in my protocol log, if TB is using the MOVE command?
    Environmemt: TB 31.0, Windows 8.1-64, Dovecot IMAP server

    Thanks, but before I do that, I don't mind asking for help elsewhere, perhaps on the Dovecot list or something. I notice that an INTRA-mailbox move does go significantly faster, and I see a "moved messages" status message down the bottom, too. (haven't checked the log yet, but I strongly suspect it is using the IMAP MOVE extension for this operation)
    Postbox behaves the same as Thunderbird - inter-mailbox moves are very slow - it is obvious that it is manually moving the messages. (and likewise, intra-mb moves are rapid)
    I kind of suspect that it's just not going to work between mailboxes, despite what the RFC says. If I find out anything, or file a bug report, I will indeed report back.

  • Mail 4.3 and IDLE command in IMAP

    Hello!
    I have recently discovered how to 'mimic' mobile push email on my Snow Leopard Mail.app using the IDLE command. Still I have some problems, and I would like to understand why:
    I have latest Snow Leo installed, with Mail 4.3.
    I have 5 email accounts on Mail.app, all set on IMAP:
    MobileMe
    2x Gmail
    2x Exchange 2007 University server.
    I have activated IDLE command on MobileMe and the two Gmail, but in the two exchange emails I don't have the option to activate it (in preferences). Check for new messages is set to MANUALLY.
    All accounts have been set up AUTOMATICALLY by mail.app.
    They work as follow:
    MobileMe pushes email in a matter of a second. I send it (from a test account) and I have it in mail.app
    For all other accounts I have some issues.
    5 minutes ago gmail was NOT receiving pushed emails. I had to Get Mail manually. Yet, the two exchange 2007 emails got the emails pushed in a matter of seconds.
    I then quitted mail.app and restarted it. Now Gmail pushes in a matter of seconds, while the Exchange servers no longer push...
    Am I doing something wrong? Could anybody help me with this?
    Many thanks!

    FYI:
    Exchange 2007 emails: 'push' works perfectly when setting up the mailbox as IMAP and not as Exchange 2007. This implies a little more work (as you will have to manually select Trash and Junk mail folders) and it won't automatically set up calendar and task sync. Yet, if like me you use these mailboxes only for emails, this is the way to go.
    I hope this thread will help someone!

  • I have noticed that Safari does not support some HTML commands on apple operating systems. Can anyone help with this issue please?

    I have noticed that Safari does not support some HTML commands on this operating platform. Can anybody throw any light on this issue please?

    Examples.

  • Does nokia 6303 support AT Commands?

    Hi, guys can anyone tell me, nokia 6303 classic support the AT Commands, because i want to use it for sms.
    Thank you.
    GM.

    Hi sddhajoshi,
    Thanks for your post and welcome.
    AT commands were used with analog modems to change modem settings and perform actions. What is it you are trying to accomplish?
    If you are trying to use your phone as a modem to your PC you do not need these commands.  When you install PC suite on your PC you can use the 'Connect to the internet' function in PC suite.
    Press the 'Accept As Solution' icon if I have solved your problem, click on the Star Icon below if my advice has helped you!

  • Does Windows 8.1 support NVMe admin commands to access SMART info from SSD?

    Hi, we are developing and testing our new "NVMe SSD" and toolbox.
    When we try to get SMART info from our NVMe SSD at Windows 8.1, we are having troubles that Windows 8.1 seems not pass "Get Log page" command which is one of NVMe admin commands.
    However, we can successfully get SMART info from SATA-based SSD without any issues.
    So, just wondering if Windows 8.1 natively support all NVMe admin commands, or we need to develop our own special driver instead of Windows in-box driver (StorNVMe.sys).
    Thanks in advance for any help.
    BR, 
    HJ

    Hi HJ,
    StorNVMe.sys supports the admin commands internally. On win8.1, the miniport driver doesn't allow NVMe pass-though commands thus you cannot get NVMe log out of the driver.
    Regards,
    Michael Xing [MSFT]
    Thanks, Michael!
    Is there any other walk around to get NVMe log out of the driver?
    I found an old thread (below) that you mentioned SCSI pass through IOCTL commands, could you give me some more detailed information on how to do it?
    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsdesktop/en-US/8882bd78-b12e-43e3-a892-92a044ce4882/how-should-we-manage-the-nvme-devices-in-ws2012r2-?forum=wdk#f741642d-ec39-4fc2-a99c-e38bde20e7f9
    Thanks a lot!
    HJ

  • E61 IMAP IDLE - success

    I'm setting up an E61 for a neighbour to use with his email server (Dovecot IMAP). After browsing various forums it looks like lots of people are complaining about the imap idle implementation on this phone.
    After doing lots of testing and packet sniffing I've found the following, which hopefully will be of some use to other users.
    By default, the email application does not start up when the phone is powered on. You can start it manually of course, but if you want automatic email notifications you have to be careful not to close the app (all too easy by pressing the "end call" key).
    However, if the app is set to do automatic retrieval then it will give notifications without having to explicitly start the app - *so long as* the interval is set to 30 mins.
    What seems to happen is that if the interval is set to 2 hours or more, the application connects, checks email, and disconnects as per the schedule. No "IDLE" command is ever sent by the phone. Obviously no good for Push-email....
    However, if the interval is set to 30 mins, imap idle comes into play. On powering up the phone it connects to the server, checks email and then issues the IDLE command *and leaves the data connection open*. Then, 29 minutes later, it sends "DONE", then immediately sends "IDLE" again (rather than doing a data-intensive standard polling for new mail).
    I've had the phone running in this configuration for a couple of days now over 3G and it has been 100% reliable.
    The trick seems to be to use 30-mins "auto-retrieve", but this is badly worded - it could be called "Enable IMAP IDLE" on the phone. Even though it talks to the server every 30 mins (29 and a few seconds actually....), it is a very small amount of data - just enough to keep the server happy and comply with the imap idle rfc's, and does not seem to drain the battery.
    Hope this all made sense and is of some use to someone....
    In short - 30min auto-retrieve = phone sends "IDLE" & "DONE", push-email works.
    2 hours or more - phone never sends "IDLE" and always disconnects from server after checking mail.
    Phone is on "3" network in the UK and the firmware is 2.0618.06.05

    I tried setting up the 30 minute interval. It does work as desired, but is not without hiccups.
    a) If the server gets disconnected, it takes around 30-35 minutes to get connected again. This is acceptable, as atleast it should work predictably.
    b) If you move between two zones, say from my office to my home, the connection of my E61 to the IMAP Server gets broken. If I check my mail before the E61 tries to resend the IDLE command it'll try to retrieve it, and then hang-up. After that, specially in the latest firmware 3.0633.09.04, I cannot even kill the client. Either I restart the phone, or crash the phone manually (by going into Options -> Find, searching for a text, and then clicking Options again). The client is dead, and so is the functionality of the Messaging Key. Then it'll start every half hour, connect, check the mail and disconnect (since 30 mins was the time period specified for polling).
    If this is going to be the functionality, then I think having POP3 set to 30 minutes interval is more suited since atleast it'll retrieve some portion of the mail as well rather than ONLY the headers as in the case of IMAP.
    If anyone can help with the questions below
    1. Can't I just set the phone to check mail at 5 minute interval - i.e. Connect, Check Mail, Disconnect, after 5 minutes again Connect & so on. This happens wonderfully if you set the auto-retrieval to 5 minutes and manage to crash the mail application. It'll connect, check mail and disconnect without complaining. Only the Messaging Key will not work, and crashing the application also is difficult :-(
    2. Is it possible to use an IMAP Server which does not support IDLE, so the client cannot remain connected to the server? I tried disabling the IDLE capability in Courier IMAP but it didn't work.
    3. Can we use any Linux based mail server which can support ActiveSync, so the Mail For Exchange client can be used rather than the Nokia IMAP Client. Mail For Exchange seems to be much more robust (I'd checked out mail2web.com).
    Sometimes I feel that since Nokia is promoting all Push Mail Clients on E61 which are available for a fee, it deliberately does not try to improve the IMAP IDLE support since it may encroach upon the subscription based Push Mail Solutions. Wish Camera Phones were allowed in my office, so would've gone for a Palm Treo with Chattermail.

  • How to do IMAp IDLE on 9300i

    I've just discovered what IMAP IDLE is. My mail server supports it, and I believe the 9300i also does.
    So my question is, how to actually make it happen - how o I get the 9300i to say IDLE to the server? I can't find anything in any of the email settings.
    Would be very grateful for any help, thanks

    Hi,
    Please see these documents.
    Note: 453137.1 - Oracle Workflow Best Practices Release 12 and Release 11i
    Note: 831982.1 - 11i/R12 - A guide for troubleshoting Workflow Notification Emails - Inbound and Outbound
    Note: 469822.1 - Oracle Workflow Release 12 Diagnostics
    Note: 748421.1 - Oracle Workflow ATG Support: R12 Java Mailer Setup Diagnostic Test
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Does lion server support a single email address across multiple devices??

    I am looking to move from an outdated Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 to OS X Lion Server but I am unsure as to how Lion will handle email. I do not want to spend money on a new windows server if I can get a Mac Mini Server to do the job. I am a very small business with a number of email accounts for a couple employees and need access to email and calendar from both the office iMac's and my Macbook Pro when on the road. My IT guy says I need Exchange but he's been off base on a few other items recently and I wanted to check with other sources.
    I have 2 new iMac's, a MacBook Pro, an iPad1 and and iPhone4 on the mac side of things and 2 windows computers running XP. I would get rid of the windows computers completely if not for my CAD program which runs best not in a virtual machine mode.
    How well will email and calendar entries sync across devices?

    I have a very similar setup at my office. Lion Server will push email, calandar, contacts to all of your apple product with out a hitch.
    As far the Windows XP machines, you can access email over IMAP with Thunderbird, and calandars via sunbird or the built in web app.
    I would ditch the exchange server move to Mac OS X Server, and never look back.
    God Luck!
    PS. All of your devices will be in sync all the time.
    Shore answer:
    Does lion server support a single email address across multiple devices??
    Yes.

Maybe you are looking for