Does GT60-ONC support Hyper-V (Windows Server 2012)??

Does GT60-ONC support Hyper-V (Windows Server 2012)??
I own GT60-ONC bought in Thailand.
I remove windows 8 and install Windows Server 2012.
I want to install Hyper-V feature.
But I cannot see any option to enable virtualization from BIOS.
my current BIOS info.. is
MSIHQ: Information detected by MSIHQ Tool ver: 1.25g
MSIHQ: Report generated in Tue 04/29/2014 at 11:50:02.71
Mainboard:  MS-16F3
PCB Version:  REV:1.0
BIOS Version: E16F3IMS.10C
BIOS Date:  4/26/2012
EC-FW Version: 
please help .........
///

You are using Hyper-V server and not Hyper-V on Windows Sever.
Hyper-V server is free, but it only includes the Hypervisor and no GUI (Only for managing Hyper-V)
what's your physical machine OS ?
If it's Windows 8 or 8.1 then you can enable the Hyper-V management tools (Programs and features, Turn On/off Windows Features, Hyper-V, Hyper-V management tools). Then open the Hyper-V console and connect to your Hyper-V server.
Regards, Samir Farhat Infrastructure and Virtualization Consultant || Virtualization, Cloud, Azure ? Follow and Ask here https://buildwindows.wordpress.com

Similar Messages

  • Why does my Cisco router firewall block Windows Server 2012 traffic, but not Windows Server 2008 traffic?

    Hello,
       I run a small business network with five physical servers: three Dell servers running Windows Server 2008 R2, one custom build running 2008, and another custom build running 2012 with Domain Controller Role (same hardware for both custom builds). 
    The Dell servers are all running the Hyper-V role and each has a number of 2008 VMs.  I also have a 2012 VM with the Domain Controller Role on one of the Hyper-V servers and another VM with a completely base install of 2012.
       All servers are plugged into a Cisco SG300-52 switch which is uplinked to a Cisco 881 router which is connected to a cable TWC provided Ubee cable modem.  I have no VLANs setup.  I do have the Firewall on the router configured
    to inspect most traffic.
       Here is my problem:  I cannot connect to most of the internet on ANY 2012 server (and all exhibit the exact same behavior), but I have NO problems connecting to the internet from 2008 servers.  Here is what I already know:
       1.) I can ping the outside world just fine so ICMP is passing to any external host.
       2.) Two of the 2012 servers are DCs running DNS services and they can connect to the internet just fine for DNS requests because they are doing a perfectly good job of providing DNS services to my network.
       3.) Here's where it gets really weird: I can browse in internet explorer to Bing.com and it works.  I can also go to a couple other Microsoft websites (though they are very slow).  If I click on any link in Bing, however, it doesn't
    work and gives me a page not available error.  If I connect to a non-MS website like Google or my company website, I get page not available.
        4.) I have tried to telnet to port 80 at Bing and it works.  I have tried to telnet to port 80 at google.com and it won't connect.  The 2008 servers have no issue telneting to either bing or google on port 80 and none of my client
    PCs on the network do either.
        5.) Windows Update will not connect and neither will any other update service such as AVG (I have AVG Antivirus installed WITHOUT firewall on two of the three servers. The base 2012 VM has no software installed and no roles...I built it
    just to see if it could connect after a fresh install and it still cannot.)
        6.) The network connection does not indicate limited connectivity (probably because ICMP appears to be passing successfully)
         7.) If I connect the server directly to the modem it has full internet access.
         8.) All internal LAN connectivity is perfectly fine and runs at full speed.
         9.) I have scoured the internet trying to find other examples of this particular kind of connectivity issue on 2012 and I have found two TechNet articles that are similar, but they both had the same resolution: changing the router
    worked, but no one knows why. (I would have included the links, but apparently I cannot do that yet)
    My question is this: What is different about Windows Server 2012 networking that would render it unable to communicate through a router that Windows Server 2008 has no problems with?  I ask because, unlike in these two articles where they were
    running personal networking equipment they could easily upgrade, I'm running a Cisco 881 with what should be virtually limitless configuration options and I have no desire to replace it.  I have to assume the issue is somehow related to the firewall configuration,
    which I could fix easily, but I don't know what to change.  If anyone knows what changed in 2012 and why I would be able to browse to bing and other MS sites but no where else, please pass them along.  Thanks.

    This is the IP Config for the 2012 DC:
    Windows IP Configuration
       Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : COMPANYDC02
       Primary Dns Suffix  . . . . . . . : company.local
       Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
       IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
       WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
       DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : company.local
    Ethernet adapter Ethernet:
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) 82574L Gigabit Network Connection
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-25-90-DC-EF-D5
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
       Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::81d5:53cf:bd07:14ed%12(Preferred)
       IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.202(Preferred)
       Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
       Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.1
       DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 301999504
       DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-1A-96-D5-C3-00-25-90-DC-EF-D5
       DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.202
                                           10.10.10.221
       NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    Tunnel adapter isatap.{9929D989-8E88-4096-A1CB-61F1DB173FA3}:
       Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Tunnel adapter Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface:
       Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft Teredo Tunneling Adapter
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    This is the IP Config for the fresh install 2012 VM:
    Windows IP Configuration
       Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : WIN-800299O7ES6
       Primary Dns Suffix  . . . . . . . :
       Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
       IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
       WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
       DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : company.local
    Ethernet adapter Ethernet:
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . : company.local
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft Hyper-V Network Adapter
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-15-5D-0A-5C-02
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
       IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.49(Preferred)
       Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
       Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Saturday, August 23, 2014 10:23:01 PM
       Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:23:01 PM
       Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.1
       DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.1
       DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.10.10.220
                                           10.10.10.221
       NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    Tunnel adapter isatap.company.local:
       Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
       Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . : company.local
       Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft ISATAP Adapter
       Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0
       DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
       Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    NOTE: 10.10.10.220 and 10.10.10.221 are the other domain controllers on my network.  One of them is 2012 and one of them is 2008.  They are both functioning correctly for providing DNS services.  The 2012 Virtual DC, however, still has
    the internet connectivity issue that this whole post was about in the first place.
    NOTE2: When I logged on to COMPANYDC02 this morning, it told me that I had new Windows Updates that needed to be downloaded.   Confused, I checked the most recent time WU had checked for updates at it had successfully checked for updates last night
    at 10pm.  Of course, it failed when trying to download them, but it appears that once in a while, a connection gets through successfully...

  • Error creating VM on Hyper-V Windows server 2012 R2 (0x80070569).

    I recently installed in my domain a member server 2012 r2 with Hyper-V Role, and got the following error when creating a new vm:
    Logon failure: the user has not been granted the requested logon type at this computer.(0x80070569).
    The user is momber of Domain Admins group and is logged on the server. I noted that the domain admins group has not the right "log on as a batch Job". Is this right required to create vm ? What are the others requirements to install and admin virtual
    machines in Hyper-V?

    Hi Claudio,
    "As Microsoft recommended 'best practice' for Hyper-V servers is to not install any additional Roles or Features that do not specifically support virtualization. As an example, in a Hyper-V Cluster, the Hyper-V Role and the Failover Clustering feature are
    installed to support highly available virtualized workloads. Hyper-V hosts play a critical role in an organizations' virtualization strategy. Microsoft recommends that the Hyper-V servers be managed in a separate OU in Active Directory (if they are domain-joined).
    Only group policies that apply specifically to Hyper-V host machines should be applied to this OU. This minimizes the risk of a policy conflict affecting the proper functioning in a Hyper-V host. "
    For details please refer to following link:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2779204/en-us
    Best Regards
    Elton JI
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Multi-Hypervisior Manager support for Windows Server 2012 R2

    Hi,
    I am attempting to connect to a Windows Server 2012 R2  Hyper-V and am getting the following error message.
    "Unable to Connect to host hyper01"
    I have tested and can connect to a Windows Server 2012 without issue.  Checking the documentation for support and whilst Windows Server 2012 is not supported I wanted to ensure I wasn't making an error.
    If it is indeed not supported at this moment, is there a viable alternative?
    Many Thanks
    Tristan

    Hi,
    Windows 2012  R2 is not supported by MHM 1.x. Please take a look at http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vcenter-multi-hypervisor-manager-11-guide.pdf, page 9, "vCenter Multi-Hypervisor Manager Software Requirements" section.
    For you convenience I'm pasting the list of supported third-party hypervisors:
    Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2012
    Microsoft Hyper-V for Windows Server 2012
    Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008 R2
    Microsoft Hyper-V for Windows Server 2008 R2
    Microsoft Hyper-V for Windows Server 2008
    Regards,
    -Ilko

  • Windows Server 2012 R2. Redirecting the "All apps" part of the Modern UI

    I am building a new Remote Desktop Session Host-solution based on Windows Server 2012 R2.
    I am using the new Startcreen layout export function to define the start screen. It Works like a charm. The Next step is then to configure the "Apps" page of the Modern UI. On a similar solution based on Windows Server 2012, this was done
    by redirection the Start Menu folder within the GPO.
    But the Folder Redirection feature does not seem to Work on Windows Server 2012 R2. My "Apps" page look like this: 
    Not what I want to present for the users!
    Have you experienced this? And do you have a solution for this. I am stuck!
    Regards,
    Thomas

    Hi,
    Firstly, the screenshot is broken, would you please check it.
    Meanwhile, we can refer to this article to customize the Start Screen.
    Customize Windows 8.1 Start Screens by Using Group Policy
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn467928.aspx
    Thanks.
    Jeremy Wu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Windows Server 2012 - In-place Upgrade to R2

    Is Microsoft going to support in-place upgrades from 2012 to 2012 R2?

    Hi,
    Currently, we have no official news regarding if it supports upgrade from Windows Server 2012 to 2012 R2. But according to the previous OS upgrade path, I think it should support.
    Regards,
    Arthur Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Does windows server 2012 foundation ed. support sharepoint?

    does windows server 2012 foundation ed. support sharepoint?

    Based on the feature set, yeah it would support SharePoint 2010, but I wouldn't recommend it. Server 2012 Foundation must be a Domain Controller or in a Workgroup, neither of which are good scenarios for a SharePoint installation.
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Does ASA rdp Plugin supports windows server 2012?

    HI,
    I am using rdp plugin for ssl vpn, it is working fine for windows server 2003 but same plugin is not working for server 2012.
    Can you please tell me does it supports or not. Is there any changes we need to do at server side?

    Hi Guna,
    There is an enhancement request opened for supporting RDP plugins on Windows server 2012.
    http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCuh27112
    So as of now your only options is to use Anyconnect client or Smart tunnel.
    HTH

  • Does Windows Server 2012 support Remote Desktop Client 6.1?

    Hi,
    Does Windows Server 2012 support Remote Desktop Client 6.1? IU can't find a link anywhere on the Microsoft site to confirm this!
    Thanks,
    Jim

    this should help you
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/b664ddaf-6c11-49e2-8a69-0df3b8ef13a1/server-2012r2-rds-farm-with-xp-and-windows-vista-clients?forum=winserverTS

  • Biztalk Server 2013 does not support Windows Server 2012 R2

    is there any document or statement from MS that States "Biztalk Server 2013 does not support Windows Server 2012 R2"

    Hi Mohit,
    I haven't come across any document, but there is a blog from Microsoft about it.
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/biztalknotes/archive/2013/10/29/biztalk-2013-compatibility-with-latest-platforms-of-microsoft.aspx
    Maheshkumar S Tiwari|User Page|Blog|BizTalk
    Server : How Map Works on Port Level

  • Does Oracle database supports Windows server 2012?

    Does Oracle database supports Windows server 2012? If not, when it will be supported?

    Hi;
    Oracle not certified wiht win8 or win2012. Please check below note:
    Oracle - Compatibility Matrices and Release Information [ID 139580.1]
    11.2.0.x Oracle Database and Networking Patches for Microsoft Platforms [ID 1114533.1]
    Statement of Direction: Oracle Database 11g Release 2 - Microsoft Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 [ID 867040.1]
    Certification Information for Oracle Database on Microsoft Windows (64-bit) [ID 1307195.1]
    Certification Information for Oracle Database on Microsoft Windows x86 (32-bit) [ID 1307189.1]
    PS:Please dont forget to change thread status to answered if it possible when u belive your thread has been answered, it pretend to lose time of other forums user while they are searching open question which is not answered,thanks for understanding
    Regard
    Helios

  • Windows Server 2012 - Hyper-V - iSCSI SAN - All Hyper-V Guests stops responding and extensive disk read/write

    We have a problem with one of our deployments of Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V with a 2 node cluster connected to a iSCSI SAN.
    Our setup:
    Hosts - Both run Windows Server 2012 Standard and are clustered.
    HP ProLiant G7, 24 GB RAM, 2 teamed NIC dedicated to Virtual Machines and Management, 2 teamed NIC dedicated to iSCSI storage. - This is the primary host and normaly all VMs run on this host.
    HP ProLiant G5, 20 GB RAM, 1 NIC dedicated to Virtual Machines and Management, 2 teamed NIC dedicated to iSCSI storage. - This is the secondary host that and is intended to be used in case of failure of the primary host.
    We have no antivirus on the hosts and the scheduled ShadowCopy (previous version of files) is switched of.
    iSCSI SAN:
    QNAP NAS TS-869 Pro, 8 INTEL SSDSA2CW160G3 160 GB i a RAID 5 with a Host Spare. 2 Teamed NIC.
    Switch:
    DLINK DGS-1210-16 - Both the network cards of the Hosts that are dedicated to the Storage and the Storage itself are connected to the same switch and nothing else is connected to this switch.
    Virtual Machines:
    3 Windows Server 2012 Standard - 1 DC, 1 FileServer, 1 Application Server.
    1 Windows Server 2008 Standard Exchange Server.
    All VMs are using dynamic disks (as recommended by Microsoft).
    Updates
    We have applied the most resent updates to the Hosts, WMs and iSCSI SAN about 3 weeks ago with no change in our problem and we continually update the setup.
    Normal operation
    Normally this setup works just fine and we see no real difference in speed in startup, file copy and processing speed in LoB applications of this setup compared to a single host with 2 10000 RPM Disks. Normal network speed is 10-200 Mbit, but occasionally
    we see speeds up to 400 Mbit/s of combined read/write for instance during file repair
    Our Problem
    Our problem is that for some reason all of the VMs stops responding or responds very slowly and you can for instance not send CTRL-ALT-DEL to a VM in the Hyper-V console, or for instance start task manager when already logged in.
    Symptoms (i.e. this happens, or does not happen, at the same time)
    I we look at resource monitor on the host then we see that there is often an extensive read from a VHDX of one of the VMs (40-60 Mbyte/s) and a combined write speed to many files in \HarddiskVolume5\System Volume Information\{<someguid and no file extension>}.
    See iamge below.
    The combined network speed to the iSCSI SAN is about 500-600 Mbit/s.
    When this happens it is usually during and after a VSS ShadowCopy backup, but has also happens during hours where no backup should be running (i.e. during daytime when the backup has finished hours ago according to the log files). There is however
    not that extensive writes to the backup file that is created on an external hard drive and this does not seem to happen during all backups (we have manually checked a few times, but it is hard to say since this error does not seem leave any traces in event
    viewer).
    We cannot find any indication that the VMs themself detect any problem and we see no increase of errors (for example storage related errors) in the eventlog inside the VMs.
    The QNAP uses about 50% processing Power on all cores.
    We see no dropped packets on the switch.
    (I have split the image to save horizontal space).
    Unable to recreate the problem / find definitive trigger
    We have not succeeded in recreating the problem manually by, for instance, running chkdsk or defrag in VM and Hosts, copy and remove large files to VMs, running CPU and Disk intensive operations inside a VM (for instance scan and repair a database file).
    Questions
    Why does all VMs stop responding and why is there such intensive Read/Writes to the iSCSI SAN?
    Could it be anything in our setup that cannot handle all the read/write requests? For instance the iSCSI SAN, the hosts, etc?
    What can we do about this? Should we use MultiPath IO instead of NIC teaming to the SAN, limit bandwith to the SAN, etc?

    Hi,
    > All VMs are using dynamic disks (as recommended by Microsoft).
    If this is a testing environment, it’s okay, but if this a production environment, it’s not recommended. Fixed VHDs are recommended for production instead of dynamically expanding or differencing VHDs.
    Hyper-V: Dynamic virtual hard disks are not recommended for virtual machines that run server workloads in a production environment
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee941151(v=WS.10).aspx
    > This is the primary host and normaly all VMs run on this host.
    According to your posting, we know that you have Cluster Shared Volumes in the Hyper-V cluster, but why not distribute your VMs into two Hyper-V hosts.
    Use Cluster Shared Volumes in a Windows Server 2012 Failover Cluster
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj612868.aspx
    > 2 teamed NIC dedicated to iSCSI storage.
    Use Microsoft MultiPath IO (MPIO) to manage multiple paths to iSCSI storage. Microsoft does not support teaming on network adapters that are used to connect to iSCSI-based storage devices. (At least it’s not supported until Windows Server 2008 R2. Although
    Windows Server 2012 has built-in network teaming feature, I don’t article which declare that Windows Server 2012 network teaming support iSCSI connection)
    Understanding Requirements for Failover Clusters
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771404.aspx
    > I have seen using MPIO suggests using different subnets, is this a requirement for using MPIO
    > or is this just a way to make sure that you do not run out of IP adressess?
    What I found is: if it is possible, isolate the iSCSI and data networks that reside on the same switch infrastructure through the use of VLANs and separate subnets. Redundant network paths from the server to the storage system via MPIO will maximize availability
    and performance. Of course you can set these two NICs in separate subnets, but I don’t think it is necessary.
    > Why should it be better to not have dedicated wireing for iSCSI and Management?
    It is recommended that the iSCSI SAN network be separated (logically or physically) from the data network workloads. This ‘best practice’ network configuration optimizes performance and reliability.
    Check that and modify cluster configuration, monitor it and give us feedback for further troubleshooting.
    For more information please refer to following MS articles:
    Volume Shadow Copy Service
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee923636(WS.10).aspx
    Support for Multipath I/O (MPIO)
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc770294.aspx
    Deployments and Tests in an iSCSI SAN
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/bb649502(v=SQL.90).aspx
    Hope this helps!
    TechNet Subscriber Support
    If you are
    TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback
    here.
    Lawrence
    TechNet Community Support

  • VMM Agent install fails on Windows Server 2012 R2 Hyper-V

    Hi,
    We are unable to install VMM 2012 R2 agent on Windows Server 2012 R2 server either from VMM console or manually on the hyper-v server.
    Error on VMM Console:
    Error (410)
    Agent installation failed on chsicoecdh03.casper.com.
    Fatal error during installation (0x80070643)
    Recommended Action
    Try the operation again. If the problem persists, install the agent locally and then add the managed computer.
    ==================================================================
    Error on Hyper-v server:
    MSI (c) (E8:D0) [16:53:24:726]: Windows Installer installed the product. Product Name: Microsoft System Center Virtual Machine Manager Agent (x64). Product Version: 3.2.7510.0. Product Language: 1033. Manufacturer: Microsoft Corporation. Installation success
    or error status: 1603.
    Also, I suspect may be issue with WMI then checked WMI repository and it is in consistent state. winmgmt /verifyrepository.
    Please help on this issue.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks
    Kumaresan Lakshmanan

    So, I've managed to research this some more since Thursday and I've come to the conclusion that Hyper-V does a horrible job of supporting Qualcomm NIC cards. That's the only thing I can conclude as far as where the issue is originating. I've read many
    post and walkthroughs but nothing that has helped. The issue wasn't with any settings in the domain controller. The issue was that there really is a slow connection originating at the domain controller that is a VM and has network connectivity through the
    virtual switch from Hyper-V. So, next question is, how do I get the DC to have better connectivity through the NIC that Hyper-V won't give it? If hyper-v would allow passthrough, this would be so much simpler. VM-ware is looking really good at this point.
    Im disappointed in MS right now.

  • Windows Domain Controller on Windows Server 2012 R2: Hyper-V roaming profiles not loading due to slow connection

    I have racked my brain and done everything that I know to do for about two weeks now.  I am setting up a new system at our fire department and I am having the worst luck with getting the workstations to login to the domain controller with roaming
    profiles.  It keeps telling me that the roaming profile could not be loaded because of a slow connection.  These are workstations that are connected directly to the switch that the DC is connected to.  I have tried multiple connections regarding
    the layout (DC into the router, router into the switch).  The router is a Cisco RV220W.  I have two VLANS, one for public and one for private domain.  The Private VLAN has DHCP turned off since I am providing it through the DC.  I currently
    have a connection from the Private VLAN going to the unmanaged switch that the workstations and server are plugged into.
    The server is a Dell PowerEdge R420 that has 6 NIC ports (1 dual port and 1 quad port).  I have a virtual switch setup on Hyper-V for an external port (let's say Card 2 Port 3) that is assigned to the WS 2012R2 Domain Controller.  The DC can see
    the internet fine and the workstations can connect to the shared folders on the server.  I can retrieve files by just using the computer name or FQDN.  The DC is also running DNS and DHCP.  The DNS has the _msdcs setup from when I installed
    the active directory role.  I have attempted to assign static IP addresses to the workstations:
    IP:                     10.0.0.80
    Subnet:             255.255.255.0
    IPV4 Gateway:  10.0.0.1
    IPV4 DNS:        10.0.0.12
    I've attempted "append the specific DNS suffix", I've "registered the connection in DNS", I've used "use this connections suffix in DNS registration".
    The server is assigned:
    IP:                     10.0.0.12
    Subnet:             255.255.255.0
    IPV4 Gateway:  10.0.0.1
    IPV4 DNS:         10.0.0.12
    The DNS entries have forwarders that forward to my ISP DNS servers for lookup
    I've enabled and disabled DHCP, I've installed a new VM just to create another DC to make sure that I didn't goof up when I created it.
    I've lost my patience with this project and am sinking fast.  Can someone please offer some advice as to what I've done wrong?  I've created this exact scenario at work many times but, I've never done it with Windows Server 2012.  Is this
    possibly something to do with the Dell PowerEdge server (Generation 12) with the SR-IOV?  I am going to attempt to work on it some more tomorrow when I get over there.  I think there may be an issue with the SR-IOV not being enabled on the machine
    through the Dell Bios.  Would the SR-IOV really cause the workstations to report a slow connection?  When I login at the domain controller the roaming profiles and folder redirection work fine so, I know the GPO settings are correct.  I don't
    have "ignore slow connections" or any of those GPO's set.  I need to get it working the correct way so, I didn't want to fool the server when there is another underlying problem.  Any help that someone can offer, I am more than willing
    to listen.  If you need more information, please ask.
    Thanks,
    Jay

    So, I've managed to research this some more since Thursday and I've come to the conclusion that Hyper-V does a horrible job of supporting Qualcomm NIC cards. That's the only thing I can conclude as far as where the issue is originating. I've read many
    post and walkthroughs but nothing that has helped. The issue wasn't with any settings in the domain controller. The issue was that there really is a slow connection originating at the domain controller that is a VM and has network connectivity through the
    virtual switch from Hyper-V. So, next question is, how do I get the DC to have better connectivity through the NIC that Hyper-V won't give it? If hyper-v would allow passthrough, this would be so much simpler. VM-ware is looking really good at this point.
    Im disappointed in MS right now.

  • Windows Server 2012 R2 - ALL HF's Failing to install as "Does Not Apply to this computer"

    Hi,
    A general question about hot fix installs.
    I have multiple servers that are all Windows 2012 R2. They do not have internet connections, so I have to install the Hotfixes manually. I download the HF's from the ISO download page (https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/913086) every month. I collect them and install in a bulk install during a release cycle ( a couple times a year). I just realized that NO HF's have installed since JUNE 2014. Every HF that shows up in WindowsServer2012R2 directory fail to install with a message of "The update is not applicable to your computer". Which is fine if that was true, but.... I get this message for every HF from the ISO's since June 2014. NOT one HF thinks it is applicable to my computer. Could that be the case? No HF's apply to my Server 2012 systems since June of 2014?
    This is my system info, and below that is the results from attempting to install 95 HF's.
    C:\TEMP>systeminfo
    Host Name: MYHOST
    OS Name: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Datacenter
    OS Version: 6.3.9600 N/A Build 9600
    OS Manufacturer: Microsoft Corporation
    OS Configuration: Member Server
    OS Build Type: Multiprocessor Free
    Registered Owner: Windows User
    Registered Organization:
    Product ID: 00252-80025-36226-AA727
    Original Install Date: 6/13/2014, 8:04:39 AM
    System Boot Time: 3/16/2015, 2:34:45 PM
    System Manufacturer: Dell Inc.
    System Model: PowerEdge R720
    System Type: x64-based PC
    Processor(s): 2 Processor(s) Installed.
    [01]: Intel64 Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4 GenuineInt
    el ~2500 Mhz
    [02]: Intel64 Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4 GenuineInt
    el ~2500 Mhz
    BIOS Version: Dell Inc. 2.2.2, 1/16/2014
    Windows Directory: C:\Windows
    System Directory: C:\Windows\system32
    Boot Device: \Device\HarddiskVolume1
    System Locale: en-us;English (United States)
    Input Locale: en-us;English (United States)
    Time Zone: (UTC-07:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada)
    Total Physical Memory: 262,099 MB
    Available Physical Memory: 249,337 MB
    Virtual Memory: Max Size: 301,011 MB
    Virtual Memory: Available: 288,015 MB
    Virtual Memory: In Use: 12,996 MB
    Page File Location(s): C:\pagefile.sys
    Domain: mydomain.sgn
    Logon Server: \\MYHOST
    Hotfix(s): 25 Hotfix(s) Installed.
    [01]: KB2862152
    [02]: KB2868626
    [03]: KB2876331
    [04]: KB2888505
    [05]: KB2892074
    [06]: KB2893294
    [07]: KB2893984
    [08]: KB2898785
    [09]: KB2898868
    [10]: KB2898871
    [11]: KB2900986
    [12]: KB2901125
    [13]: KB2901128
    [14]: KB2909210
    [15]: KB2909921
    [16]: KB2912390
    [17]: KB2916036
    [18]: KB2919442
    [19]: KB2922229
    [20]: KB2923392
    [21]: KB2925418
    [22]: KB2930275
    [23]: KB2931358
    [24]: KB2931366
    [25]: KB2936068
    Network Card(s): 6 NIC(s) Installed.
    [01]: Broadcom BCM57800 NetXtreme II 10 GigE (NDIS VB
    D Client)
    Connection Name: ISCSI
    DHCP Enabled: No
    IP address(es)
    [01]: 192.168.1.30
    [02]: fe80::38c9:e59c:5ac2:e0a1
    [02]: Broadcom BCM57800 NetXtreme II 1 GigE (NDIS VBD
    Client)
    Connection Name: NIC3
    Status: Hardware not present
    [03]: Broadcom BCM57800 NetXtreme II 1 GigE (NDIS VBD
    Client)
    Connection Name: MGMT
    DHCP Enabled: No
    IP address(es)
    [01]: 7.48.64.32
    [02]: 7.48.64.30
    [03]: fe80::f14e:9339:9326:c7fd
    [04]: Broadcom BCM57810 NetXtreme II 10 GigE (NDIS VB
    D Client)
    Connection Name: SLOT 5 Port 1_swport_VMRepwan
    DHCP Enabled: Yes
    DHCP Server: N/A
    IP address(es)
    [05]: Broadcom BCM57800 NetXtreme II 10 GigE (NDIS VB
    D Client)
    Connection Name: NIC2
    Status: Hardware not present
    [06]: Broadcom BCM57810 NetXtreme II 10 GigE (NDIS VB
    D Client)
    Connection Name: SLOT 5 Port 2_swport_VMOpswan
    DHCP Enabled: Yes
    DHCP Server: N/A
    IP address(es)
    Hyper-V Requirements: A hypervisor has been detected. Features required for
    Hyper-V will not be displayed.
    I have a script that runs each HF install.. If I run them manually without the tool I get the same results so it is not the script..
    Installing 95 patches
    for Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Datacenter x64
    Repository path: U:\Patch Repository_4_1\2012_R2_HFs\
    1. Windows8.1-KB2894852-v2-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    2. Windows8.1-KB2894856-v2-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    3. Windows8.1-KB2920189-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    4. Windows8.1-KB2926765-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    5. Windows8.1-KB2928120-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    6. Windows8.1-KB2931358-x64.msu patch status: ALREADY INSTALLED - SKIPPING
    7. Windows8.1-KB2931366-x64.msu patch status: ALREADY INSTALLED - SKIPPING
    8. Windows8.1-KB2933826-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    9. Windows8.1-KB2939576-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    10. Windows8.1-KB2953522-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    11. Windows8.1-KB2957151-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    12. Windows8.1-KB2957189-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    13. Windows8.1-KB2957689-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    14. Windows8.1-KB2961072-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    15. Windows8.1-KB2961887-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    16. Windows8.1-KB2962872-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    17. Windows8.1-KB2964718-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    18. Windows8.1-KB2964736-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    19. Windows8.1-KB2965788-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    20. Windows8.1-KB2966072-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    21. Windows8.1-KB2966826-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    22. Windows8.1-KB2966828-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    23. Windows8.1-KB2971850-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    24. Windows8.1-KB2972213-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    25. Windows8.1-KB2972280-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    26. Windows8.1-KB2973114-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    27. Windows8.1-KB2973201-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    28. Windows8.1-KB2973351-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    29. Windows8.1-KB2974008-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    30. Windows8.1-KB2976627-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    31. Windows8.1-KB2976897-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    32. Windows8.1-KB2977292-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    33. Windows8.1-KB2977629-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    34. Windows8.1-KB2978668-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    35. Windows8.1-KB2982794-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    36. Windows8.1-KB2982998-v2-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    37. Windows8.1-KB2987107-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    38. Windows8.1-KB2987114-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    39. Windows8.1-KB2988948-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    40. Windows8.1-KB2992611-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    41. Windows8.1-KB2993651-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    42. Windows8.1-KB2993958-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    43. Windows8.1-KB3000061-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    44. Windows8.1-KB3000483-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    45. Windows8.1-KB3000869-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    46. Windows8.1-KB3001237-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    47. Windows8.1-KB3002657-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    48. Windows8.1-KB3002885-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    49. Windows8.1-KB3003057-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    50. Windows8.1-KB3003381-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    51. Windows8.1-KB3003743-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    52. Windows8.1-KB3004150-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    53. Windows8.1-KB3004361-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    54. Windows8.1-KB3004365-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    55. Windows8.1-KB3005607-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    56. Windows8.1-KB3006226-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    57. Windows8.1-KB3008923-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    58. Windows8.1-KB3008925-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    59. Windows8.1-KB3010788-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    60. Windows8.1-KB3011780-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    61. Windows8.1-KB3013126-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    62. Windows8.1-KB3013455-v2-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    63. Windows8.1-KB3014029-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    64. Windows8.1-KB3018943-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    65. Windows8.1-KB3019215-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    66. Windows8.1-KB3019978-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    67. Windows8.1-KB3020393-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    68. Windows8.1-KB3021674-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    69. Windows8.1-KB3021952-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    70. Windows8.1-KB3023607-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    71. Windows8.1-KB3036197-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    72. Windows8.1-KB3021953-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    73. Windows8.1-KB3022777-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    74. Windows8.1-KB3023266-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    75. Windows8.1-KB3023562-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    76. Windows8.1-KB3024663-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    77. Windows8.1-KB3029944-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    78. Windows8.1-KB3030377-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    79. Windows8.1-KB3031432-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    80. Windows8.1-KB3032323-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    81. Windows8.1-KB3032359-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    82. Windows8.1-KB3040335-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    83. Windows8.1-KB3033408-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    84. Windows8.1-KB3033889-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    85. Windows8.1-KB3034196-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    86. Windows8.1-KB3034344-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    87. Windows8.1-KB3035017-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    88. Windows8.1-KB3035034-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    89. Windows8.1-KB3035126-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    90. Windows8.1-KB3035131-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    91. Windows8.1-KB3035132-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    92. Windows8.1-KB3037634-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    93. Windows8.1-KB3039066-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    94. Windows8.1-KB3044132-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    95. Windows8.1-KB3046049-x64.msu patch status: DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS COMPUTER
    Thanks,
    Dave
    

    Hi Dave,
    Would you please check CBS lg file and other relevant event logs if find more clues? On current situation, please refer to following article and check if can help you.
    Update is not applicable to your computer- but it is
    Best regards,
    Justin Gu
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Maybe you are looking for